#help-0
1 messages · Page 414 of 1
i always called it ΔL, if that looks familiar?
alternatively, perhaps you've seen it as |S_1P_1 - S_2P_1|?
yes
you want the difference in the length between the two lines
can anyone answer this for mr
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
no
actually no it would be
adjacent
sorry
hypotenuse minus adjacent gives us difference
lets do that real quick
what is "adjacent"
bottom one is assumed to be lambda distance greater
just for description sake
it would be the top wavelength
above the hypotenuse
my issue is with your wording
the lines need not form a right triangle
this is your situation
it is not a right triangle, as you can see
theres no "hypotenuse" or "adjacent" side
path length difference is just |S_1P_1 - S_2P_1|
how would this
formula work
just asking from a point of wanting to understand
oh completely looked over 10cm and 11 cm lol
let me update the labelling then
is the formula
okay so the absolute value part is essentially describing how the path length difference is equals to the set of variables
path length difference being the difference between the first distance indicated by PnS1 and the second distance PnS2
you may use this to solve for lambda though
so in terms of visuals we're looking for the yellow line?
essentially yeah
why though
what significance does that serve
I would understand if we were looking for "L" being the distance between the points and the screen
idk im a total physics noob so
I'm just trying to understand why formulas are
hmm
also from what I'm seeing "n" is some form of constant
let's see if i can describe this to you
i havent done physics explaining for a bit
please bear with me
haha yeah no problem
n is the nodal line number
okay, here goes nothing
when you're looking at a nodal line, you're looking at the line where the waves generated by S1 and S2 destructively interfere
okay I get destructive interference
where it makes a flat line because both amplitudes add up to that
since P1 and P2 generate waves at the same rate, this must occur at a half-integer multiple of the wave lengths of one of them
mhm because being 1/2 lambda more would cause destructive interference
yes
while 1 lambda more would cause constructive interference
so the path length difference between the two sources and the point on the nodal line must be equal to a half-integer multiple of the wavelength
but is this under the assumption that destructive interference is happening between the two points?
or does it always happen when you have two waves
this is what "nodal" line means!
destructive interference
all along the line
mhm
it turns out that you can take the number of the nodal line, cut 1/2 off of it, multiply it by lambda, and get the path length difference between the two sources and any point on the nodal line
i cannot exactly remember why, but it seems intuitively clear to me now
a lot of words here but I'll try clarifying:
so what your saying is the difference in between the two lines (path length difference) must be equal to a half integer multiple of the wave length
- my question is which wave length are we referring to
the wavelength of the waves generated by S1 and S2!
the path length difference is a bit more general than that
when you have constructive interference, the path length difference has to be equal to an integer multiple of the wavelength
does that make sense?
yep
agreed
so when you have destructive interference, the PLD has to be equal to a half integer multiple of the wavelength
correct
right, so what is the issue you're having rn?
so what I'm trying to understand is, what is the overall thing being formed from PS1-PS2
is it just a general wave length as shown here
probably shouldn't focus on that part too much then, in that instance lol
this picture makes it a bit hard to see what we mean by PLD
lemme see if i can find a more intuitive picture
i dont expect to though, since this idea isnt a very "clean" one to look at
okay nvm, this may work
now a nodal line would be as indicated by the image right here
where the red lines are the nodal line
aka where it's consistently destructive interference
what am i looking at
point C is on an anti-nodal line where constructive interference occurs
okay
you can physically count the number of crests to get there from both S1 and S2
yeah
for a nodal line, you'd count half-integer multiples
the path length difference is just that
the difference in path length from S1/S2 to P
thats right
okay perfect
in our question, they explicitly give you the distance from the sources to the point
i.e. they given you something like this
just on a nodal line instead
and instead of 6 lambda and 4 lambda, they've given you 10cm and 11cm
so now you can use this information to get lambda
so then our new formula is $1= (n-\frac{1}{2})\lambda$
mj
cm
okay
okay, so lambda = what?
so we have now $\frac{1 cm}{(n-\frac{1}{2})}=\lambda$
mj
$\frac{1 cm}{(1e-9-\frac{1}{2})}=\lambda$
it's the number of the nodal line we're interested in
wait so it's not
mj
where did that come from
hmmmm
I'm looking at what you sent
this here
there are multiple nodal lines though
okay we're given information
5 cm and 8 hz being
the frequency
and the distance between the two
which isn't important
redrew it
with out variables
our*
so why does the first nodal line matter, but not the second
yeah we have no info on the 2nd nodal line or 3rd, etc
yes, the nodal line number
the first nodal line is always in the centreish
the other ones are further out
why? because the path length difference is minimal in the centre, so we call it the first
this
well, not quite
it's always about PLD, as i've said before
the nodal line is not necessarily dead centre
it could be in some cases, but it's very likely not in ours
hm okay
$\frac{1 cm}{(n-\frac{1}{2})}=\lambda$
mj
because we know which nodal line we're working with
first one?
oh
I had thought of n being
the value
of the nodal line
not the nth nodal line
theres no definition of the "value" of a nodal line
yeah
nodal lines are nodal lines, we only given them numbers for convienence
so it's just 1 because it's the first nodal line
correct
if it were the 2nd, we would have n = 2, but the path length difference would also change in tandem
so if in the question it told us the second nodal line is located 10 cm from... we would use 2?
okok
$\frac{1 cm}{(1-\frac{1}{2})}=\lambda$
mj
it does
the wavelength doesnt change just because you sit on a diff nodal line
so you have 1cm/unitless
finding lambda
yeah
correct
mj
equation?
here's my advice for high school physics problems
ALWAYS write down ALL of your givens first
yep, I even highlight them lol
well thanks for your help 🙂
haha atleast you won't have to relearn how to do it lol
always good to refresh
your memory
indeed
Closed by @glad vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for my math test I am allowed an 8.5 x 11 formula sheet. But no worked out examples or procedural steps, ect. Would the image below be considered a formula or something else?
since there is no numbers ig its not an example
so I could write that down?
well the picture is not really necessary unless you really need it
Closed by @hot bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure where i went wrong
what is the antiderivative of 1/x
Integrating x^{-1} should not yield 1
x^(-1) is not integrable via the common integration method for polynomials
well i dont have 1/x anythere
as i told you in your earlier help channels
you have (1/3)*(1/x)
,, \int x^n \dd x = \f{x^{n+1}}{n+1} + C \qq n \in \R\setminus\set{-1}
note the setminus of -1
so bascially we split it up into 2
elaborate.
you split up 1/3x into (1/3) and (1/x)
and then you took the intergral
true or false?
i guess
well then true or false
not how integration works
\int f(x)g(x) dx \neq (\int f(x) dx)(\int g(x) dx)
$\int f(x)g(x) dx \neq (\int f(x) dx)(\int g(x) dx)$
ニンニク狼
ニンニク狼
im not good at understanding letters notations
but basically, if its a constant you can split it and if it is not then you dont split it
yes no?
yes
alright, so goign back to the problem, uhh
(resending for convinence)
so i should split first and then integrate?
wdym by split
how does this look
thats good!
split like this
it does not look like any of these
closest seems like a
but we just imported an aboslute value sign
ニンニク狼
the negative side has to have an antiderivative too
the integral of 1/x is equal to ln|x|
.close
Closed by @mystic holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello I have to deal with the social surplus the problem is Prices and quantities demanded at dates t = 0, 1 are as follows:
P0 = 8, P1 = 10 and Q0 = 30, Q1 = 20.
What is the arc elasticity of demand?
I found 3.37
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@lethal spade close either one of the channels
yes
@lethal spade Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Send the formulas for elasticity and work you did
@lethal spade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @quasi sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me with this problem: -5x^2-18xy+50x+8y^2-20y
What's the question
This is important to the question
Yeah
@silent sundial Has your question been resolved?
@silent sundial Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @silent sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where did the 2x and divided by 2 come from
i thought sin^2x +cos^2x = 1
@scenic wing Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me go through this IVP exercise?\
\
\
Show that there's an interval $I \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ with $3 \in I$, so that the initial value problem
$$
\begin{cases}
x'(t) = (x(t) - t)e^{t^2+x(t)}\
x(3) = 7
\end{cases}
$$
has a unique solution.
Levens
I tried having a go but I didn't get anywhere
@austere compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @austere compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i was about to take a look at this 💀
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I understand what the question is asking me to do, I just dont know how to do it.
Like I understand that I wont get an actual value for p so it will be in the answer I just dont get how im supposed to represent the area of the triangle.
Poor dude was waiting for an hour 😭
i know 😭
<@&286206848099549185>
@vital wind Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vital wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @urban thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help
Calculate the derivative piecewise, then evaluate the one sided limits of the derivative
could you explain
yes
4x-4 would be the answer ?
first find the derivatives of each, then plug in x=1 for each
if the answer is the same for both, then it exists and that's your answer
Pictures of screens are bad. Upload a screenshot instead
lost on this one
<@&286206848099549185>
due at 11:59!
um
ok ig i fail
that isnt the derivative
since you have a 8^h there, your guess should be an exponential function
you also have a 1 there
so what should your x be for your exponential function to be 1
or rather your a
0 ?
ok good
now the first part of the limit definition of a derivative has a f(x+h)
since your x = a = 0, what should your f(x) be
remember you have a 8^h there
0 ??
no...
1?
1 + 0 ?
no..
ok here we'll do a little guessing
since you have a 8^h there
lets guess that f(x) = 8^x
does that work?
really?
its not h
a= 1
oh
and a is also not 1
what did you tell me here before?
a is 0 ??
yes
do you know a good calc channel
calc 1 channel
i missed class last week
and also my professor isnt the best
organic chem tutor maybe
yeah
its f(3)
?
oh ok
sorry for pic but im in a rush
last attempt and last question
so this is correct
3
yeah
(but if you still get it wrong then im so sorry the question didnt really specify what it wants)
its okay thanks for helping
is this a test?
Closed by @wooden topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
6a)
@jovial flax Has your question been resolved?
@jovial flax Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know this might be the wrong topic to ask, but is anyone here familiar with Digital Logic in computer science/engineering? This is a circuit and problem that I am working with, but I just need help understanding it
Are you trying to make a full adder?
yeah
Did you try the hint
but im just having trouble just understand how to get that into the whole circuit thing
Is that short for karnaugh
yes
uhh i dont think i learned k map or i mightve not reviewed it yet
well okay i guess we are doing the standard way then.
are you familiar with sum-of-products representation of boolean functions
(Karnaugh maps was invented to make this part of the problem easier)
yes
okay. So lets focus on the sum output for now. Write the 'sum' as a sum of products
you can just do this right:
A’ B’ C-IN + A’ B C-IN’ + A B’ C-IN’ + A B C-IN = sum
alright
you have [
A'B'C + A'BC'+AB'C'+ABC
]
a little bit
here is a good starting hint
you can end up getting
C(A'B' + AB) + C'(A'B + AB')
yeah
and then C XOR (A XOR B).....?
yes!
that's the sum indeed
okay so we are going to do the same thing for C-out
list it out
so if you look back at this chart, you can derive
A'BC + AB'C + ABC' + ABC
and then you can simplify to AB + BC + AC
yeah
so the thing is though
what you wrote is correct
but there is a simpler way to view the circuit for the C output
We need to view the full adder as two half adders that are connected
which is true
do you know the logic diagram for a half adder?
yeah it is that
a full adder is basically two half adders constructed together
but anyways i guess this will be a bit hard to explain
this form is fine
what do you need
i was still stuck on the problem because i still dont really understand how making that truth table would go to the circuit
because im having trouble understanding the circuit
like just draw out the logic diagram now
you have the equations for both output minimised
.close
Closed by @west brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, could you help me please? How can I resolve this exercise?
use the right hand side of this rule on each of the fractions
Hm, I still don't understand, could you write it out?
81=ln(e^81)
@fathom ravine Has your question been resolved?
Could you write it out on paper? Like the whole resolved exercise, so I would be able to analyse it, because I still dont understand
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do i do next , ....
multiply out the middle two brackets
and then immediately factor them again, but this time in the other order
(or in other words, just switch the two terms)
ok ,but what is the logic behind taking out the "middle 2 brackets" ?
well you want to switch them so that they will cancel with the other terms
either you know that you are allowed to do this if you only have combinations of A and I
or you do it the slow way by multiplying out and then factoring again, but in the other way around
didn't get this point .....
then ignore it
u mean expanding !?
yes
,rotate
.
no
not sure what you did there
I mean only (I-A)(I+A)
show that it is equal to (I+A)(I-A)
oh okay i get that ....
got it ,
but can you tell what you said here ,i guess i missed some concepts ..
notice that while you expanded, you only ever got terms of the form A^(i+j)
which is the same as A^(j+i)
so you know that you will be able to undo all the expanding, but with writing the terms the other way around
this will always happen if you multiply terms looking like this
like a polynomial in A, if that means something to you
some linear combination of I, A, A^2, A^3,...
@cerulean junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im confused about the bit where you change from x to y
Like at which point do you do it
After you square f(x)?
After you integrate the squared f(x)?
CHARTBIT!!!!!!
😍
WELCOME BACK
Why thank you 
Also how do you mean here?
as in where you need to rearrange your function for $\pi \int x^2 \dd y$?
@pseudo ice
I think so
I just know that its x and we need to change it to y
Something like that
I dont really remember
Yep, you’d need to change it to x = … before you put it in the integral, before you put it in the bit where you square it preferably 
Yep like that
then you put that as your x and square it (again
)
As a “cheat” as well…
I like cheats...
As the formula has an $x^2$ in it, you could just instantly say that $x^2 = 9y$ and then the integral $\pi \int x^2 \dd y = \pi \int 9y \dd y$ (with the limits of course)
😝
Hahah it is
I’m lacking today 
@pseudo ice
What i get for choosing to do tex halfway through a message 
Multiply by 9 here 
Omg 🤦♂️
Okkkkk
I understand the trick
Cause it needs to be squared anyways 😄
So saves time
Thank you sooooo much!!!
You are still the best helper ❤️
Really glad you are back
❤️
.close
Closed by @warped topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a question about area under curve
the formula for area under curve of two functions has a modulus if you dont want to graph em
is it okay to put the modulus outside the integral?
i might be misunderstanding your question but i am pretty sure no
@loud monolith Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Geometric Arithmetic
t3 = root2
t8 = 8
Find S8
breh
i was mid typing out my question
anyway
its very clearly just doubling it each time
You can type it here I guess
just do your typical steps
Yeah but I don't know my GP's
aight so do you know how to find the progression
t3 is surd2, or 2^1/2, and t8 is 8, or 2^3
?
its not doubling mb
i
i feel like its obvious enough that i should just say the answer
but at the same time idk what the process is like here
in your syllabus
cuz id just write the answer out personally
I'll work backwards from the answer
Something got to do with a(1-r^n)/(1-r) or without the denominator
nah way simpler
just find any function f(n) where f(3)=surd2 and f(8)=8
hint is that both of those numbers are 2 to the power of something
why not
tell them to stick it where the sun dont shine
lol
He gives us basic examples so we can get use to it
Then we apply it to hardcore questions in the future
And I can't even solve a simple one bc I wasn't there 😔
why hassle yourself with the way that is both more specific, and more of a hassle
o well
anyway i havent touched that equation in like years so imma leave that to someone else to teach
i got my own questions n shit
you have n and term n for 2 equations
and a general formula
if you know how to sim eq that shit you can find both a and r
But I don't have t1
you dont need t1
do you know simultaneous equations?
Yes
Yeah yesyes
Yeah that's right
if a(1-r^3)/(1-r)=surd2 and a(1-r^8)/(1-r)=8
thats 2 equations and 2 unknowns
and you can sim eq that shit
@deft vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deft vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know how to find the range
like the steps
If you can find the global minimum, you can use that to see that the range is all numbers greater than said global min
Alternatively, it’s probably possible to find the range of this graph by inspection
Closed by @dusk wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can a second order voronoi diagram be created using a first order voronoi diagram algorithm applied to a transformed version of the points?
@rocky cloak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
@clear tendon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys how am i supposed to understand this sequence:
2,2,4,6,10,16 ...
what is the nth term here
or ttt rule
and how am i even supposed to understand this
@winter fable Has your question been resolved?
I think it is fibonacci sequence doubled
Huh
do you know the rules of fibonacci sequence?
nope
can you explain please
@brittle ember
oh
yeah i searched it up
yeah it does
tho how does that explain the sequence?
btwhow to get a helper role t
.close
Closed by @winter fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
sorry yeah @brittle ember wat u sayin?
$F_n = F_{n - 1} + F_{n - 2}$ where $F_0 = 0$ and $F_1 = 1$
casework
what the fu-
Fibonacci sequence
so 2+2=4, 2+4=6, 4+6=10...
on your sequence
yeah
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
adding up before 2 terms
i forgor
bru
idk in english
You just get it from the roles button in the settings of the server
oh
if you're done please close this thread
Closed by @winter fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, question coming up, gonna try LaTex to make it readable... 1 sec
Let
$$T : \text{P}_2(\C) \to \C^2$$ be defined by
$$[ T(p) = \bigl(p(0), p'(0)\bigr). ]$$
Further define the following ordered bases for $$\text{P}_2(\C) \C^2$$ respectivly.
binnet
Let
$$T : \text{P}_2(\C) \to \C^2$$ be defined by
$$\[ T(p) = \bigl(p(0), p'(0)\bigr). \]$$
Further define the following ordered bases for $$\text{P}_2(\C) \C^2$$ respectivly.
```Compilation error:```! Undefined control sequence.
l.50 $$T : \text{P}_2(\C
) \to \C^2$$ be defined by
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.```
I think it's $\mathbb{C}$
Jelle
thanks,,,, writing the question is half the struggle... lol
Let
$$T : \text{P}_2(\mathbb{C}) \to \mathbb{C}^2$$ be defined by
$$[ T(p) = \bigl(p(0), p'(0)\bigr). ]$$
Further define the following ordered bases for $$\text{P}_2(\mathbb{C}) \C^2$$ respectivly.
\text{P}_2(\mathbb{C})&:\ B = (2+2x+x^2, 1-x, 1), &&E = (1,x,x^2), \
\mathbb{C}^2&: \mathbb{C} = \bigl((1,1), (0,-1)\bigr), &&F = \bigl((1,0), (0,1)\bigr).
binnet
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
i) SHow that T in a linear transformation
ii) Calculate the matrixrepresentation of T och T from the definition.
iii)Calculate the base change matrix id_(P_2(C)) and id_(C^2).
iv) Verify that the clause of base change for linear transformations is fulfilled for …
Let's see is this does it:
Let $$T : \text{P}_2(\mathbb{C}) \to \mathbb{C}^2$$ be defined by
$$[ T(p) = \bigl(p(0), p'(0)\bigr). ]$$.
Further define the following ordered bases for $$\text{P}_2(\mathbb{C}) \C^2$$ respectivly.
\text{P}_2(\mathbb{C})&:\ B = (2+2x+x^2, 1-x, 1), &&E = (1,x,x^2),
\mathbb{C}^2&: \mathbb{C} = \bigl((1,1), (0,-1)\bigr), &&F = \bigl((1,0), (0,1)\bigr).
i) Show that T is a linear transformation
ii) Calculate the matrixrepresentation of $$\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}$$ och $$\matrixrep{T}{E}{F}$$ from the definition.
iii) Calculate the base change matrix $$\matrixrep{\id_{\text{P}2(\C)}}{B}{E}$$ and $$\matrixrep{\id{\C^2}}{C}{F}$$.
iv) Verify that the clause of base change for linear transformations is fulfilled for $$\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}$$ och $$\matrixrep{T}{E}{F}$$ by comparing both sides of the equation in the clause.
(suggestion: i’ts easier to find the inverse of a 2x2 matrix than a 3x3 matrix).
binnet
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
nope...
If you want inline equations use $ instead of $$
全能の存在
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I should have practiced this somewhere bforre.... oh, thanks! that helps!
How do you type a base change matrix on here?
I.e. [A]_B ^C if you get what ia mean...
${[A]}_B^C$ doesn't work?
全能の存在
I'm not certain what you're wanting the typesetting to look like, so
How ddid you write that?
${[A]}_B^C$ doesn't work?
\matrixrep{T}{E}{F} is what i am used to, but it didnt work here... 1 sec cleanign up my question so it's readable...
That's probably provided by some package that you have in your normal latex environment, but not in your texit preamble
You can add it to your texit preamble using the preamble command
yeah sfor sur
elemme close this until I got my text formating sorted and purmed myself some coffee...
.close
Closed by @robust light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ops, did I do this wrong too..? i meant to close my question not the room...
You did it correct
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay I am back, same proble, better formating!
Let $T : \text{P}_2(\mathbb{C}) \to \mathbb{C}^2$ be defined by
$$T(p) = \bigl(p(0), p'(0)\bigr)$$
Further define the following ordered bases for $\text{P}_2(\mathbb{C}) and \mathbb{C}^2$ respectively.
$$P_2(\mathbb{C}): B = (2+2x+x^2, 1-x, 1), E = (1,x,x^2) ,$$
$$\mathbb{C}^2 : \mathbb{C} = ((1,1), (0,-1)), F = ((1,0), (0,1)) .$$
i) Show that $T$ is a linear transformation.
ii) Calculate the matrix representation of ${[T]}_B^C$ och ${[T]}_E^F$ from the definition.
iii) Calculate the base change matrix
${[id_{P_2(\mathbb{C})}]}B^E$ and ${[id(\mathbb{C}^2)]}_C^F$
iv) Verify that the clause of base change for linear transformations is fulfilled for ${[T]}_B^C$ and ${[T]}_E^F$ by comparing both sides of the equation in the clause.
(suggestion: it’s easier to find the inverse of a 2x2 matrix than a 3x3 matrix)
binnet
I am stuggeling with these LA proofs 😦
Hopefulle having a readble question should make it a bit less of a stuggle though...
Have you done part i)?
Nope, I have done nothing on this problem yet, as I am stuck, sad and frustrated. I do have decent understanding but I am just not sure of how to approach this
okay, do you know the conditions you have to check to show that T is linear?
So the transformation T is a transformation of polynomials of degree 2 of less with complex coefficients? to what exactly though?
to C^2
TOocheck linearity do somehting like check that is associative and ...
not quite
like, check the 8 conditions?
I think you’re getting confused with the axioms of a vector space
oh, shit, yeah i am, spot on!
isn't it somehting like check that T(a+b) = T(a)+ T(b)
We say a function that maps between vector spaces V and W is linear if for all x,y in V and c in F, we have T(x+y) = T(x) + T(y) and T(cx) = cT(x)
and check that cT(a) = T(ca)
yup
okay, this is all good, but I have no clue what the vector space C^2 is tbh...
think of it like R^2
But instead of having real numbers, you have complex numbers instead
it’s the set of all possible ordered pairs of complex numbers
Indeed, but that’s how it goes sometimes lol
okay, got it
alright, let’s check the first condition
Let’s pick some random x and y in P_2(C)
This means that x and y are both polynomials of degree 2, with complex coefficients
okay
let’s let x = ax^2 + bx + c and y = dx^2 + ex + f
can someone help me solve this im clueless.
A cone has its height x and radius y. if the value of x + y = s Find its height and radius when its volume is maximum for the different values of s
So now we get T(x+y) = T(ax^2 + bx+ c + dx^2 + ex + f)
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Do we get this point? @robust light
yeah, seems correct
so we need to also prove it is linear with multiplication with a scalar then?
okay, now the map says that we must send this to ((x+y)(0), (x+y)’(0))
Yes, in principle we can do both checks at once
sorry, hwere is this from?
This?
yeah, gimmi a sec
using the E to F ?
oh nono
sorry, you've lost me a bit 😦
oh, that means polynomial and it's derivative at x= 0 right
okay okay.. i'm back in it
should be add coefficients first maybe?
you may if you’d like, but in my opinion, you can do this more easily than that
(x+y)(0) = c + f, if you notice that
and (x+y)’(0) = b + e
okay, so we have (c+f, b+e)
and now I would just do the same, but separately? to show that they are equal?
T(x) + T(y)
you can, or you can keep going this way
okay, tell me 🙂
Either way is totally valid
okay, so imo the quicker way is to not compute T(x) + T(y) because that’s painful
we left off with (c+f, b+e)
let’s split this apart
(c, b) + (f, e)?
oh, wow, on mobile! o_O that's fast for mobile!!!
notice that this is actually equal to T(ax^2 + bx+ c) + T(dx^2 + ex + f)
which is T(x) + T(y)!
is this not also equal to T(Qx^2 + bx+ c) + T(Sx^2 + ex + f) ?
can i really go in that direction for the proof?
yes, but that doesn’t matter
okay, as long as I show that linearity was preserved it follows I guess
the goal is just to show that T(x) = T(y), what you’re asking is whether T is injective
which is a different story
oh, okay cool
It’s okay if multiple elements get mapped to the same thing, because that doesn’t change the fact that those elements were mapped in a linear fashion
true true!
alright, condition 2 is very much the same
try it out
Feels like part i) should be done with then. I think I need to take a pause, and write down this answer nice and tidy, will come back for part ii) - iv).
Thank you, HUGE HELP!
okay, I’ll be back later if you still need help, or perhaps others can help you with those parts
I’ve got a class in 5 min
thank you! should I maybe close this room for now then 🙂