Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 400 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In this differential equation How does the y(p) become x^2/2-x?
If we set y=Ax+B we’re one degree to low so we need to set
y=Ax^2+Bx+C
y’=Ax+B
y’’=A
Replace the y’’ and y’ = x in the equation and we get
A + Ax + B = x
So (A)x = 1
(A+B) = 0
If A is A B must be -1
go back up to our y=Ax^2+Bx+C and plug in our values for A and B and we get
y = x^2 - x
so where is the /2 coming from?😭😭
Nvm i didn’t derive
Xd
.close
Closed by @eager iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello so how do you get the measure of CAG
14º is for what angle? FCG or FCE?
if it's for FCE, we can figure out the angle DAF by calculating 180-44-14
because G is the incenter, dividing the result by 2 would give us the angle CAG
@candid vault Has your question been resolved?
FCG I assumed
I ended up doing same just with 44 and 28 lol
Thanks
.close
Closed by @candid vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok nevermind i figured it out
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh..
If you don't have anything else to ask, do .close
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i show A~A?
so i think we WTS A = P^-1AP right?
yea find P
i switched it *
but basically
swap B with A?
im still confused cuz i dont remember much matrix
Use A = A
i thought thats the identity matrix
why is P the identity matrix
Oh
is it cuz it sdays EXISTS
so only one suffice?
I still dont get
Why A = I_nAI_N
is identity matrix basically like 1 in basic algebra?
when it comesto matrix multiplication?
Is there any case in which the identity matrix doesn't act as 1 like basic algebra?
for second solution i dont get what "multiplying both sides on the left/onthe right" mean
algebraically isn't it just "multiply both sides":
Matrix mult isn't commutative, multiplying on the left and on the right are different in general
if you have never multiplyied matrices before, i suggest you do a few problems
ohh i think i get it
so say if we want to show B = P^-1AP => A = PBP^-1 we can do this?
so it looks like we have a new decision in algebra when its matrix multiply both sides of eq, left or right
i wonder if we can also do it from the middle?
can any1 confirm this is true???
and for this one, can i multiply both sides but from the middle?
or is it only the left/right?
no, the right hand side should be A = P^-1 B P
you get that from the left hand side by left-multiplying by P^-1 and right-multiplying by P
basically its same as this one but switch P-1 and P
this is my real problem
So disregard everything else to remove confusion
i used the online source
to basically copy the same thing
wut u think
for reflection
now for symmetric
i think this is what we want?
cuz its just flipping the thing
the vars*
or am i mistaken?
that arrow thingy is the implication syumbol with a question mark on it
if B = PAP^-1, then A = P^-1 B P, not PBP^-1
how is that so
it makes sense when u matrix multiply it
but this is what we want to show,
unless we do something else compared to just flipping the variables?
start with B = PAP^-1
left-multiply both sides by P^-1 to get:
P^-1 B = AP^-1
now right-multiply both sides by P to get:
P^-1 B P = A
ok, so what you wrote is incorrect
because i think we have to flip the variables
or how do we find what we want to show
for symmetry
i would simply say:
because thats what i always thought we had to do for symmetry, flip the variables
OHHH wait
I think i know
Is it because the equivalence relation is saying "there exists an invertible matrix P "
so it doesnt have to be the same?
yes correct
it's not the same P when you are showing B~A
but that's fine, you just need an invertible matrix
the P that works for B~A is the inverse of the P that works for A~B
that's why i called one of them Q above, to avoid confusion
If you become familiar with notation, you can write this:
$A\sim\text{}B\Leftrightarrow B=PAP^{-1}\Leftrightarrow\\A=P^{-1}BP\Leftrightarrow A=P^{-1}B\left( P^{-1} \right)^{-1}\Leftrightarrow B\sim\text{}A$
Joanna Angel
yes perfect
hm
for some reason i always thought it had to be like P P^-1 to cancel out
not also P^-1 P
nope, inverses work on both sides
for rectangular, non-square matrices, there's such a thing as a left inverse that is not a right inverse, or vice verssa
but for square matrices, if a matrix is a left inverse, then it's also a right inverse, and vice versa
ah you shouldn't start by assuming it's the same P in the first two equations
i would start with:
B = PAP^-1
C = QBQ^-1
since P and Q may not be the same matrix
then you're looking for an invertible matrix, say R
such that C = RAR^-1
@gritty pond Has your question been resolved?
oh so thats still simple i think?
so we just do C = PQAP^-1Q^-1 and let R = PQ?
should be QPAP^-1Q^-1 ,not PQAP^-1Q^-1, but that's the right idea
R = QP
yes exactly
(may want to explicitly comment that (QP)^-1 = P^-1 Q^-1 if that's not an already well established fact at that point in your material)
@gritty pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk how to do this proof without working on the other side
I am apparently only supposed to work on one side
expand csc and you are pretty much done
okay let me try
and I can cancel out the sins
and I am left with 2/cos^2x?
which is 2sec^2x?
yes
ohhh thanks
nw
also
you know how like sin(90-x) = cos
is that also the case with sin(x-90)
like is sin(x-90)=cos?
no but almost
do you know that sin(-x) = -sin(x) ?
yeah
but not for cos or sec
because cos(-x) = cos(x) right
does this have anything to do with it
sin(x-90) = sin(-(90-x)) = -sin(90-x) = -cos(x)
@undone saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is 8 and 16 like terms
Does 8 and 16 have the same variable and power?
its just 8 and 16
no power or varible
rightt
So both can be written as 8x^0 and 16x^0
So do they have the same power and variable?
yes
So then are they like terms?
yes
There you go
Closed by @tame dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
eh bisects feg, yes r no
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Closed by @grizzled burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
yeah it bisects
but why
explain please
@grizzled burrow Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @grizzled burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are you able to check my work on this assignment please
@golden blaze Has your question been resolved?
Sure, one sec
For the first question, you should consider what the absolute value means before putting a negative within the brackets. The second question has the right idea and correctly shows the reflection but it may be helpful to plot some key points first since some of the points seem inaccurate, for example, is the square root of 5 equal 4?
So for number 1 I should put the - outside the brackets?
But for 2 where would I plot the points at?
Yep! Put the - outside the brackets to ensure all numbers are made negative
Think about some of the perfect squares, things like 1, 4, 9, 16, etc.
They will provide a nice number to work with and a nice outline
So for example, when x is 4, the y will be 2, when x is 9, the y will be 3
This work?
Yep! That’s much more accurate
Quick question for number 1 I knew it was reflect but not sure if it was x or y, if it reflected across the x axis would the opening face the left or right?
If it was reflected in the y nothing would change, since it’s symmetrical along the y axis
Wait I’m confused, what exactly do you mean?
It’s fine I get what I did wrong
Oh, alrighty
Other than the first two, most of them seem right, but there’s few that could probably be tweaked or corrected
For this question, I would make a slight adjustment to the formula for the first graph, and then for the quadratic I would maybe fix the key points a little bit too
For the first graph it might help to think what you’d have to multiply root 2 by to get 2
So 2x in the square root?
Along with this one, you may want to check over the key points of the second question
Yep! That’s right
Where would I plot the point on the 2x^2 question?
Try going through it by finding out what the y is when you sub in x
So when x = 1 and -1 looks right, but what would y be when x = 2 or -2?
Would it just double as well? So I would plot my points at (-2,4) and (2,4)?
So (-2,8) and (2,8)
Yep!
Is there anything I did that you’d want to go over again? Or anything else you don’t really understand?
On the most recent picture u sent and the bottom question Would the transformations be reflects across the x axis and translation?
Yep, everything was right, the only problem was that you forgot to apply the a value
This work?
Yep! You’ve got it
Alright I think that’s it for now, thanks a bunch for your help
U too
@golden blaze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(0) undefined tho
f(x) = 4/x
f(0) is undefined
yes but (x-3)/(4/x) simplifies to (x^2 - 3x)/4 only for x ≠ 0
parentheses
it has a hole at 0 yes
ye
Closed by @opal locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i cant understand what a set of real.valued functions on an interval 8s
is
is it all the real valued funtions that map an element in the interval to another element in the interval?
All functions with domain [0, 1] and codomain R
by "real-valued" they mean outputs a real number, so in this case it means functions that map the interval S to the real numbers
Closed by @quaint light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someody please explain the steps?
try multiplying the first fraction by m/m and the second by n/n
thanks
.close
Closed by @cinder breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Honestly I am so lost with the n=k+1 step
I have no idea what to sub in
cause there is no like equation on the L.H.S
ok, based on your own formulations, what is P_1?
P_1 is 0.6
ok, and P_2?
are you familiar with making like a probablity tree
You are right
let me try that
13/25
p_2
But say for the n= k+1 term how are u meant to
make a tree?
start with a tree
oh
im silly
you should use induction here, obviously, as the question states
ok, so what is the inductive step here?
it made me like understand what was going on more
Im stuck on the n= k+1
i did base case
and assumed n= k
but how can i prove n= k+1
you just gotta expand it out
expand what?
what is the expression of P_{k+1}
just p(n)_ but with 5^k+1
so what's another way to express P_{k+1}, if we have P_{k}? use the information that there's a 60% chance if it rained the previous day and 40% if it didn't
0.6*P_k + 0.4 * (1-P_k)
OML
You are so right
i did not clock that
whatsover
thank you
sm
You are life saver : )
.close
Closed by @gray patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
7^x + 2 = 5^x + 1
how would I solve this quesiton using logs
7^(x + 2) = 5^(x + 1)?
Adam Chebil
take logs both sides
wdym?
$(x+2)\log{7}=(x+1)\log{5}$
阿皮pea
oh
$\log{7^{x+2}}=\log{5^{x+1}}$
阿皮pea
do this first
and i guess u are able to solve it
10
yes
wdym by dropping the logs?
if we have a log on each side of the equal sign with the same base we can drop it right? to equate for x
so after u drop it, it will become $x+2=x+1$?
阿皮pea
definitely not
yeah
yeah...
u can do this after u added the logs
ok wait
so after did this
how do we continue
or do I move around the logs?
both log7 and log5 are constants
yeah
also
oh
.
@velvet sapphire
I expand
bs w me @velvet sapphire
what
how about

lets start with a simpler question
ok
$log_2 x = 5$
Shah2044UwU
yeah
so whats the solution
wait
||our target is this tho||
dang uve quite a few formulas at ur disposal dont ya
yeah
ye
so when i put a number in log base 2
im asking 2 raised to the power what equals that number
x in this case
yeah
@burnt escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the y coord of the vertex in 2(x-3)(x-2)
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
same idea as before
if you know calculus, find the turning point using derivatives
ok thanks
show exactly what the website asked for
and what you entered
I misread the question sorry
i went on chat gbt and i asked it what is the vertex of 2(x-3)(x-2) and it said (5/2, -25/2)
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
so would it be (5/2,-1/2) then?
yes
If you are in doubt always graph it in desmos
what website do you recommend to check answers
or use wolfram alpha
Not chat gpt
yes
Well I would use that as last resort
try solving it on your own
Closed by @charred sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I write if x could be any number?
u mean $x \in \mathbb{R}$
?
like the equation returns x=x
swagmafia3000
Like in sets or in calc?
calc
this could be right
If your equation returned this you made a mistake
no
swagmafia3000
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
in the solution key it also says any number is possible for x
Non related to my statement
That’s why the context is important
Closed by @clear comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, trying to understand this solution
I'm stuck on the "Note that..." after the tan alpha/beta
my geometry is failing me
I don't get how angle CPD = angle CQD + QCP + QDP
I also thought angle QCP = angle QDP....
In triangle APB angle P is exterior angle for triangle APD so that equals <A+ <D
<A = <Q+<C bcz it is exterior angle for triangle ACQ
@royal kiln Has your question been resolved?
sry I was away, just didn't wanna close it before I get it
i think i gotta draw this out
I totally forgot exterior angle property is even a thing, and tbh I'm still not getting it but I think I can look that up now
<cpd=<apb vertically opposite angle ....1
<apb=<pad + <pda exterior angle property ... 2
<pad= <cqd + <qca exterior angle property
Using in 2
<apb =<cqd+<qca+<pda
I don't see this <pad= <cqd + <qca exterior angle property
... I was reading that line wrong and was very confused
ok makes sense now lol
thanks
.close
Closed by @royal kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
4
i think that y value shouldnt reach negative
then the parabola should have same roots
so D = 0
@bright scarab Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, here is my thoughts. I know trigonometry and even further, but idk why 5th and 4.1 is actually wrong
bro
hi
1st
can you explain pls?
@blazing junco Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @blazing junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't get the concept of pi and pi radian like how pi radian = 180degree and only pi = 22/7, like i get why pi = 22/7... it's a value, but i don't quite understand pi 'radian'
! What the hell am I doing here?
sorry aprox
Why would you wait so long for that gif lol. Could have saved some words from me.
makes much sense now...
i could be wrong, correct me if i got it wrong...
lool sorry came in here after your message. its a neat gif, first one when you search "radian" (dont look at the rest)
ohhhhhhhhhhh
okokokokokoo
it took 3 times
like 3 cycles
and the last part were the decimal digits
did i got it right?
im not sure what you dont understand
in the gif, 3 rads isnt enough to go around half the circle
you need pi radians
oh ok
so basically if we use the length of the radius as the the measurement device to measure the circumference of the circle and name that unit as rad, so after 3 rad it's not sufficient to cover up the half of the circle so we use the pi decimal digits to cover till there...
did i got it right?
if yes
then i am good then
i don't have any doubts...
That's what it is, yeah. A radian is the angle an arc of length = radius subtends.
hmmm
thank you for teaching me in the simplest language possible... :)
thank you @slender gull @worn fox
.close
Closed by @thick cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ok so when I use soh cah or toa
Do I use the one where I don't know either answer
Like since I know the hyp so I use toa?
Huh
You use the one with a side you know and the side you wanna find
You wanna find the opposite and you have the hyp so you use soh (o/h)
Ok so tan 18.9 degree then what blank/76cm
Why are you using tan
Sorry sin*
But what is the math
All I know is sin18.9
What does sin represent
What does soh cah toa mean
S = … C = … T = …
Dude I know that
I just don't know if I times
The other stuff
While dividing
Well sin = opposite / hypotenus right
So if you take the sin of the angle
Which is opposite / hypotenus
And multiply it by the hypotenuse
The / and x cancel
To get the opposite side
So what is like the equation
Written out
So I can understand better
So after I sin the degrees or what ever I do in the question I times it by the one side that I allready know?
Yes
Yes
.close
Closed by @austere charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there, I just need a sanity check, been years since I've done these and trying to help out someone else. The question asks to find the value of k, where k makes up 2 real roots of the equation 4x^2 - 8x + k = 0. I've only been able to find one root, however, and keep coming back to the idea that the question may be incorrect, and 2 real roots don't exist?
the question doesnt really make sense
do you mean to find k such that k itself is one of the roots of the polynomial?
Two real roots when b²-4ac ≥ 0
well if =0 then one real root. with multiplicity 2
Hang on, I'll send a pic of the Q
The question seemed poorly worded/designed to me
so you want that the roots x_1 and x_2 are equal
which by the previous discussion means that the discriminant should be 0
Yeah, I thought exactly the same thing, but the question made me think there we're 2 differing roots, so I doubted my math
Thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @south yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand the first part of this solution? https://i.imgur.com/LCHU8VI.png
I don't see how that first equation follows from geometric progression of the tan of angles
I'm reading geometric progression as
tan(EAC)
tan(EAD) = n tan(EAC)
tan(EAB) = n^2 tan(EAC)
@royal kiln Has your question been resolved?
I also (though this might be the same issue) just don't get how
tan^2(EAD) is equal to tan(EAC)tan(EAB)
someone help me understand this 😭
I think I got it... I didn't realize the order they gave the angles in was the order they were in in their respective geometric/arithmetic progression
.close
Closed by @royal kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
have you tried anything?
@midnight pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the quadratic equation, in standard form, that has the following root:
3-sqrt6 and 3+sqrt6
do we add the roots and divide by two to get x vertex value, but I do not remember how to proceed
P(x)=(x-x1)(x-x2) where x1 and x2 are the roots that you mentioned
how do I do it if my roots are two terms
Since I can’t combine 3+sqrt6 or 3-sqrt6
Oh
Do I make it sqrt54
and -sqrt54
If a and b are roots then equation is
k ( x²-(a+b)x+ab)=0 where k constant
you can take k=1
a+b= 3+√6+3-√6=?
x^2-6x+3
@craggy forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @craggy forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to find where this wave has constructive and destructive interference
Closed by @hexed eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m lost like a mofo
What are you confused about?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i find all real zeroes ?!?!?
when i used synthetic division and got zero i tried to find the rest of the zeros but i couldn’t factor the polynomial i got
the 50x^3 + 35x^2 - 20x + 5.. what do i do after i got that?
the -2/5 was a given zero and when i divided it i got 0 and i don’t know what to do after that
I know, but your result in the division is not right
wait what do you mean?
it's 50x^3 + 35x^2 - 20x - 5
i accidentally changed -5 to +5
yeah
so yeah, my first step would of course be to try to factorise it, as you said
ok i’ll try
i factored it and got this?
wait can i not use factor by grouping?
do i have to factor the entire thing by 5?
ok a good step would be to divide everything by 5, it will make the numbers a bit wasier to work with
ok i’ll try
you may also notice something
you can try a few simple values
what do you mean?
you can try a few values of x that make sense in this case, just to see if we get any luck
as in plug in values of x in the equation?
mhm
if you take a close look, there is a pretty easy value that can make that zero
and once we have that, finding the other two is a lot simpler
rational root theorem would help
yep
now do i do synthetic division using 1/2? to find the rest?
yep
wait should i have just used the possible rational zeros from the previous result of -2/5 instead of doing synthetic division again
wdym
when i used the rational root theorem and got the possible rational zeros of the function
the function i divided by 5
i recommend dividing first since if you get it to a quadratic, you can potentially factor
which is quicker than rational root theorem
i gtg sorry
ok thanks for your help
i did what you said and i still can’t factor
wait nevermind i get it
.close
Closed by @soft isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just started back with Calc II after a break from Calc I. A bit rusty with integration. Could someone give me pointers as to where I’m going wrong?
Where did -5 come from
When you expand the second equation back, you will realise where you made the mistake
@copper wadi Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so as of now, i have my proof, i just want to be very precise with my variables but not sure how to be
this is what i have
i want to add more to "a, b, c are elements of R"
why?
it says that we need to be extremely precise with our explanations
for example, a, b, c all can't equal each other, or else this proof would be false
it doesn't require very many assumptions and/or subproofs
you take a, b, and c to be arbitrary elements of R
which is what $a, b, c \in \mathbb{R}$ means
Katharine
i know, but we have to mention certain things like this
i'm just curious if there are some other specific things that i need to mention
i mean
$a, b, c \in \bR$ means "take 3 arbitrary real numbers"
artemetra
so 3 different ones?
can be different, can be same – the point is that it works for both
you can also provide a counterexample yeah
if it's false for one set of values, then it's already a false statement
just go give a counter example if you're that scared of your examiners
$a, b, c \in \mathbb{R} | a > 0$
Katharine
in which case a has to be bigger than 0
but b and c are any real number
counter example like they said
or just state, since lhs $\neq$ rhs if a $\neq$ c
Katharine
something like that
Closed by @ebon meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello?
hello
hi
sorry for asking, but, what's this from?
are they like practice problems?
yes
i assume so
okay so the first one is okay
and in the second one you had the right idea, but take a look at the direction of the < and >
wym? like tbh they kinda slapped me ina face witht this i went for easy practice to this tbh idk
@real cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
No
sqrt(x) returns only positive values
sqrt(9) is only 3
sqrt(25) is only 5
What did I say that makes you think I’m doing code??
No worries use a different word if you want
The square root function, outputs/returns/gives/makes only positive values
The confusion comes from comparing an equation like
$$x^2=25$$
To
$$x=\sqrt{25}$$
Austin
Because they are different equations. Completely
If you wanted to solve the top equation
The answer would be x=5 AND x=-5
Right?
(-5)^2=25
But…. If you want to solve the bottom equation, the sqrt as a function only gives positive values, the answer to the bottom is ONLY x=5
$$\sqrt{x^2} \neq x$$ $$\sqrt{x^2}=|x|$$
Austin
Yes and the rule is stated above ⬆️
David L. Bowman
@ashen crane Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ashen crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the derivative:
cos(x)tan^2(x) - 2tan(x)sec^2(x)sin(x) / tan^4(x)
cos(x)tan(x) - 2sec^2(x)sin(x) / tan^3(x)
the 2 possible answers are
I did the formula correct and it's correct but I don't know how to translate to different forms and it looks like thats a skill they want out of us
what are you trying here?
Oh is that equals supposed to be a - sign?
Figured 
One thing that might help is to note that sec^2(x) = sec(x) * sec(x) then remembering how sec is defined, and playing around with that a bit
they only have one option for g and one option for f though so maybe we can choose any of them?
sec = 1 / cos
That might be a point 
so cos(x)tan(x) - 2 (1/cos)(1/cos)sin(x) / tan^3(x)
lol the fact that only one of the functions uses t as a variable, gee i wonder which one its derivative is
right now i'm focused on v(x)
I don't want to solve just because the letters match
I want to learn the calculus
[and I don't think so, think this one is a trick one where you need to be careful (esp noting the options for u, I think they want you to check signs!)]
but just because the signs are whatever, doesnt mean I solved the calculus
that's using your eyes to get around the calculus
Yep, looking good, now that second term of the numerator 
cos(x)tan(x) - 2sin(x) / cos^2(x) / tan^3(x)
there's a particular reason I suggested to write it as sec * sec, and that wasn't to combine them (I mean, you can, but there's a better way!)
cos(x)tan(x) - 2sin(x) sec*sec / tan^3(x)
cos(x)tan(x) - 2sin(x) (1/cos) (1/cos) / tan^3(x)
like that?
so tan^3(x) = sin^3(x) / cos^3(x)
so if we flip it it takes away the fraction cos and just becomes cos^2(x) with no denominator anymore
oh actually there would be sin
the weird thing is I got a B+ in Calc 1 at my university
shows how bad this university is
this is Calc 1 review
Was thinking that only one of the sec need to be 1/cos, but in any case in the end you'd need to change it so I guess 
can you tell me some more hints
this is not for marks or anything
I'm just trying to learn
cos(x)tan(x) - 2sin(x) sec(x) 1/cos(x) / tan^3(x)
cos(x)tan(x) - 2tan(x)sec(x) / tan^3(x)
maybe think about what sin(x) * 1/cos(x) is 
yea I did that
Yep there it is
One extra factor of tan(x) in the numerator for you
ok so then it can become
cos(x) - 2sec(x) / tan ^2(x)
if my math is this weak and it's week 1 of Calculus 2 and this is Calculus 1 review and it's been 10 years since I did Calculus 1 should I just drop out and practice?
actually I don't think it's any of the options 
am I doomed for Calculus 2 if my Calculus 1 is this weak?
it is one of the options
I need honesty though
am I doomed for Calculus 2 if its started this week?
I've had to drop it like 3 -4 times in the past
ok
so cos(x) - 2sec(x) / tan^2(x) right?
yea it is, I confused myself with what I had written on my scribble paper 
ok chart can you give me a hint please?
Anyways from here, there are different ways you could go about it, you could for example then try and convert tan^2(x) into sin^2(x)/cos^2(x) and work with that, or maybe think about the numerator...
Well sin^2(x) as the first denominator but yea 
You could
might be a good idea to also factor out a 1/sin(x) too at the same time(!)
this is getting a bit more messy than I had thought 
But that should work I think
first one should be + though right?
[I will say that simplifying at the start makes your life a lot easier!]
But maybe instead convert that cos^2 into something else...
1 - sin^2(x) ?
Yep in here, then life should become a bit closer to what we want(!)
cos(x) / sin(x) (1 -sin^2(x) / sin(x) - 2 /sin(x) )
Yep, and you can simplify the stuff inside the 
cos(x) / sin(x) (sin(x) - sin^3(x) - 2 )
cos(x) - cos(x)(sin^2(x)) - 2cos(x)/sin(x)
gonna type this out so it's nicer to see
[
\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)} \pqty{\frac{1 - \sin^2(x)}{\sin(x)} - \frac2{\sin(x)} }
]
@pseudo ice
Seeing those terms already have a common denominator to begin with...
[
\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)} \pqty{\frac{1 - \sin^2(x) - 2}{\sin(x)} }
]
cos(x) / sin(x) ( cos^2(x) / sin(x) - 2cos^2 + 2sin(x) / sin(x) )
@pseudo ice
Then try to play around with that maybe for a while
cos(x) / sin(x) ( cos^2(x) - 2 / sin(x) )
cos(x) / sin(x) (2sin^2(x) - cos^2(x) / sin(x) )
don't convert back to cos (as that's what we just came from, that's going backwards
)
cos(x) / sin(x) ( 1 - sin^2(x) - 2 / sin(x) )
1-sin^2(x) = cos^2(x) right
but you wan't me to stay away from cos?
cos(x) / sin(x) ( 1 / sin(x) - sin(x) - 2 / sin(x) )
That is true-
cos(x) / sin(x) ( -sin(x) - 1/sin(x) )
we used that here
-cos(x) - cos(x) / sin^2(x)
yea the equal sign
always hit that instead of -
-cos(x) - cos(x) / sin^2(x)
-cos(x) - cot(x) 1/sin(x)
do you think I should drop this class and rethink my life?
Yep, and then there's one more change you can do to that and you have one of your options(!)
There you go 
Anyways, also, if you simplified at the start, you could have written sin(x)/tan^2(x) = cos(x) * cot(x) then that one should hopefully be easier to differentiate 