#help-0
1 messages · Page 390 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my reasoning for finding f^-1(x) valid
and how do i find g(x)
@hybrid maple Has your question been resolved?
We have to solve that differential equation, that is the next step, there is nothing else written
ok i showed my work for the inverse nvm but how do i find g(x)
@hybrid maple Has your question been resolved?
Do .close
.close
Closed by @hybrid maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
,tex .demoivre
riemann
Oh your r isn't 1
yep
wouldnt we need to find like arctan(3)
like 3? or what
waiiit
i think i factor sqrt(3)
nvm what am i thinking
lol
Do this
whats polar form?
of complex number
is it the e^pi i
definition or what
Should be an r
well yeah but i dont know how to isolate for r
if z= a+ib, then r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2)
r is the magnitude of z
alr hold up lemme cook
You should look for it in your notes or book
yeah i knew that just havent touched complex stuff in a long time so the formulas arent coming to mind as easily
wait so i get sqrt(10) times e^i arcsin(3/sqrt(10))
but like how do u get
the rad instead of arcsin stuff
@tacit arch
Where did arcsin come from
It's your work, you should be able to explain it
no i mean like
its a substitute
for
the radian measure
u could just call it sqrt(10) times e^ix in that case and just have x = the radian measure
@tacit arch
?
you there
<@&286206848099549185>
nvm im literally blind
i thought sqrt(3) = 3 kms
.close
Closed by @olive sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I have been trying this question for like an hour now I just can't set up the first order differential equation
Past that I'd be fine to solve it I understand what I'm aiming for but not how to get there
Relate velocity and distance in a formula
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
how so
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do you think you should do? 
oh okay! what do you think would happen to a boat if you just dropped it into that current?
maybe this will help you conceptualize it
Idk it goes faster
yeah. in what direction?
have you learned about vectors at all in your class?
Direction and magnitude OH YEAH
yes
essentially, the current is moving in some direction, and the current has the property that it pulls the boat with it "perfectly" (as opposed to just flowing under it). you can quantify this direction in various ways, but one good way is by using a vector
Fr
if the current was just flowing 12km/hr due east, could you express this as a vector?
uhhh
I guess
idk the argument
Or like
Exact direction
Fr
But I guess east
Fr
well, yeah, if its flowing 12km/hr due east, it's definitely flowing east
i think that the problem is going to be super hard if you're not comfortable expressing velocities as a vector 
what do you remember learning about vectors, do you remember any notation or anything
uhh
idk
i mean honestly, i think you should learn more about vectors before trying the problem. i can provide some resources, but i'm not going to just unload a bunch of information about vectors.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/two-dimensional-motion/two-dimensional-projectile-mot/a/what-are-velocity-components
this khan academy article is good, but it does a lot of trig that isn't relevant here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGTmOCJ0NKI
this youtube video is probably good and applicable to this problem
WHAT
omg I hate physics
anyways
Let's jsut
Liek
Do it
Fr
They call me the vector god
@muted hornet
PLZ
Fr
NOO
idk wth the last bullet point means
how is a single current going two distinct directions with completely diff velocities
it's okay. One step at a time
remember our compass
so we are going 12km/h ---> that way and 7km ^ that way
so the result of the motion might look like / that
fr
fr
is the last bullet point like
One vector
Is it giving me x and y
To find magnitude
Idk
i don't think this will help
the numbers in the last bullet point specify the components of the vector, so how much the boat is moving in the x-direction and how much it's moving in the y-direction
this helps draw the picture
it's gonna help
it's gotta help
who even cares about vectors
i'm sure inverted knows how to add perpendicular velocities
the answer is triangles, triangles, triangles!
Omg so it's one vector right
Ez
now wat
WHY
NOOO
DO YOU KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON
SORT OF
If anything, the one thing you should take from this is to draw pictures for these questions!
you gonn' learn
^
|
|
|----->
like that
of what
this situation is lousy with vectors
magnitude of what
you should draw a pic to sort out all of the info
yes, there is a last bullet point
fr
alright. now what
idk
no
okay. Suppose you are an treadmill going 10km/h south and you're running 11km/h north
how fast are you going
Idek wat that msans
well if you were running in the same direction as the treadmill, you'd be going really fast
Fr
fr
have you ever been at an airport and gone on one of those treadmill things that let you get across the airport really quickly
or like an escalator
Yes
like you feel really fast when you go in the same direction a the escalator
or if you want to go up the down escalator, you have to go really fast
Fr
fr fr
so you have to go faster than the escalator is going down
otherwise you're just going to go down too
so like what do you think happens when you are going up a down escalator and the escalator is going -10m/s and you're going 10m/s
idk no progress
can I achieve infinite velocity
uhh if you had infinitely man escalators, no
some weird speed of light stuff happens
it's stupid
it'd be cool if we could achieve infinite velocity
alright, so what happens if sally is on a boat going 35km/h north that's beeing pulled forward by the current another 7km/h north
how fast is the boat going
faster
idk 42
Fr
now sally is going 5km/h westward and boat is being pulled 12km/h eastward by the current
so if i'm on the shore looking at sally, what direction and what speed does it look like sally is travelling horizontally
N
W E
S
REMEMBER THE CARDINAL DIRECTIONS
never eat sour weiners
sus
fr
yeah i'm gonna be like "SALLY, YOU'RE TRAVELLING 7KM/H EAST" when i see her go past
because that's my relationship with sally
so it looks like she's going 7km/h east and 42km/h north
what is her speed
idk
you gotta draw the picture!!!
√1813
yes
42.6
probably something like that
now wat
yes
Is that the answer
what does the question want
her absolute speed
so that doesn't really mean anything
but I assume they mean from someone observing on teh ground
like if we were on the land looking at her go, how fast would we see her going?
and that's what we found
do you want to like hangout or something
.
!
yes
wat is ur fav food
poutine. what about yours?
yes
hurray
wat is difference between an array and a matrix
what's an array
a matrix is a two dimensional array
wat does that mean
Plz help
i drew two perpendicular directions
am I correct 
wat
look at my drawing!
fr that works
but i don't like it
i want you to understand decomposing forces into their components
WE GOT DIFF ANDWERS
,w sqrt((3.5cos(10 degrees))^2 + (3.5sin(10 degrees) + 6)^2)
that would be my answer
Closed by @waxen turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Got this question as a part of my IB packet on geometry and trig. I got up to this point and couldn't figure out where to go for a while, so I looked at the answer key and somehow I'm even more confused
How did they plug it in this way to the quadratic formula?
,tex .quadratic formula
riemann
c is x, a is 1, b is -a
But then how does (a^2 - b^2) plug in as ac in 4ac?
What
Where exactly are you lost
Third step in the answer key
What i mean is, if your definitions of the inputs are correct, then how are they plugging in (a^2-b^2) for 4ac?
cuz c is the "constant terms" which is basically the parts of the quadratic without c
By the way, that's meant to be a -b^2 on line three. I miswrote that.
so a = 1 and c = a^2-b^2
Got it. I never realized the constants in the quadratic formula worked that way
Thank you so much.
By the way, do you think there's anything in the question that would've made you think to plug it into the quadratic formula to begin with? What would be your thought process going into this type of question?
Asking so I can understand better how to identify the steps I need to take for a problem in the future.
i guess just seeing that it's a quadratic in the variable you care about
it's tricky because you have to use the letters a, b, and c for two different things at the same time
but that's a thing you'll have to do in math a lot
actually, seeing the form of the solution would have given me a little hint since it has the form of (thing) ± √(other thing)
Fair enough. Thanks
@swift raptor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this physics question
A box sits on a ramp. The ramp exerts a force of 15N on the box. If the coefficients of friction are 0.2 and 0.3, what is the friction force?
i dont know how to solve this question at all
@trail summit Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
first step is to draw the diagrams
!original pls
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
i don't know what you mean by the force applied to the box from the ramp
like in which direction
A box sits on a ramp. The ramp exerts a force of 15N on the box. If the coefficients of friction are 0.2 and 0.3, what is the friction force?
this is all i have
then we have to assume that the 15N is the reaction force
the reaction force is perpendicular from the ramp at point of contact
it's in reaction from the force of gravity*masse of the box
perfect
Nice
now what's the angle of the ramp?
F frott means force of friction, $\mu_c$ means coefficient of friction dynamic (cinetique), and $\mu_s$ means coefficient of friction static.
nico
So how do u solve for it
$\mu_s$ is usualy biggerthan $\mu_c$
nico
if the Ffrott is bigger than the force that would make the box move than use $F_{frott}=\mu_s*N_{reaction}$
nico
if there is movement than $F_{frott}=\mu_c*N_{reaction}$
nico
i think since the box "sits" than there is no movement
ok
wait i made a mistake
if there is no movement than $F_{frott} \le \mu_s*N_{reaction}$
nico
and in our case there is no movment
yes
4.5N in static and 3N in dynamic yes
in static Ffrott $\le 4.5$ not necessairly equal
nico
don't forget to specify if it's in static or dynamic
So are you sure I will have to do that
Cuz I do have a quiz coming up soon
Ok so I guess since I do
don't forget
Can you tell me in simple terms how I can decide which is static and dynamic
Sorry I don’t really understand this. My bad I really need to get a good grade on this quiz or ima fail the mp
That’s why I have so many questions
I’m new to physics
force that you push on the box < or = force of friction (mass * gravity) * coefficient static on the ground than static
that's if it's not on a ramp
if it's on a ramp you need to make a diagrame and with a little (moderate/big for you) trigonometrics calculate the force of reaction
that means that the symbole on the left should be $F_{friction.statc}\le 4.5$ rather than $F_{friction.static}=4.5 $
nico
and f friction dynamic = 3
indeed
but don't forget your units at the end in (Newton)
so 4.5N
yes
alr fixed it thanks
wait
could Uk also mean dynamic
because in my class we don't use Uc
@haughty sun
still here
alr my bad
by U you mean $\mu$ right?
nico
yes
then makes sense that we probably don't use the same symboles since we're probably not in the same country
im in the US
what symbole do you usualy use ? from canada btw
Uk = coefficient of friction in dynamic and Us = coefficient of friction in static, yes they don't have any units btw
yes
hello
so
so u know that 15 is the normal force
do u know the component along the plane? due to the weight
it's all correct
Nice
No I don’t think I need that
it's not the question, there's no need for that
well it can be necessary right
coz if the force of tendency is less than us*normal force
then friction = force of tendency
what exactly do you mean by force of tendency
the force which is trying to get the box to move
the component of the weight force along the plane is trying to move the box
oh so the force Nreaction
Nreaction is the force exerted by the plane on the box right?
yeah
thats not what i am calling the force of tendency
mgsinalpha
mgcosalpha = Nreaction
which is why the box doesnt move into the plane
but coz of mgsinalpha
the box is trying to go down the plane
the maximum achievable static friction is Nreaction * Us
if this is bigger than mgsinalpha, a friction force equal to mgsinalpha would act on the box and keep it in place, without making it go down the plane
if not
the box will start to move down the plane
and a constant friction force of Uk*Nreaction will keep acting against the direction of motion
while it is still moving. so the net force in the direction of motion would be mgsinalpha - Uk*Nreaction
thats what happens right?
To solve this problem, we must know the quality of the box and its motion state
Then you can use Newton's laws
since the box "sits" then we should use the static domain rather than the dynamic right?
@trail summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can't understand what it is trying to do with that (1+Δ)(-²) .
@cerulean junco Has your question been resolved?
@cerulean junco Has your question been resolved?
(1 + difference) * u(3) = u(4) according to this operation can be deduced u(2)
It's just a calculation that is defined
I am talking about that (1+Δ)^(-2) -----(i)
how did they get that (1-2Δ+3Δ²) from (i) ?
I wan to know the skipped steps and logic behind that calculation .
matrix
???
wait
u(x) is optional
u(x)=(03,9)He identified the entire system,This is valid and you can calculate it
@cerulean junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You're a bit abstract
Guess
Closed by @teal comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, ive got this relation right here and the excercise says prove itf its equivalent or an order relation
and thats a problem why?
it is symmetric, yet not reflexive
therefore it is neither an order relation nor an equivalent relation
not all orders need to be reflexive
idk in my lecture slides
orders are partial orders+totality
and a partial order needs to be reflexive
do you have strict orders?
it doesn't fit "<" or "<="
(well ok it isnt one of those either. but just wanted to point out that not being reflexive is in general not enough)
this is an old exam, maybe they also defined strict orders in the past and this question was about that
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
well prüfen translates to check, not prove
check whether ...
anyways it isn't transitive at all
thought it had to be one of them
german isnt first language lol
anyway thanks
.close
Closed by @past violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've a question about physiscs. About the difference between couple en moment
when you have a couple the net moment would be 0, but there is still rotation? how could this bne
be
net force, the force moment would still be non-zero , unless I'm missing something
i.e the torque
couple might not be colinear
it's just when you have to calculate equilibrium for the moments a couple will give you equilibrium, but this will always provide rotation?
no?
the couple might be colinear
you have a force F , distance H from a rotation point. Now you have another force -F also distance H from rotation point
this will lead to a couple
but the sum of moments will be 0
but a couple can even be non colinear
no rotation will be here
how???
take a pen, apply one force +h from point O and the same negative force -h from point O
it will rotate
this is a couple
wait
oh
I thought you meant the same point
@livid jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @livid jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was trying to find the radius of the circle, however im stuck to the step where im trying to find the lines in which it passes the center. Im guessing I equate both the x and x1 to get the center of the circle, is it the right direction?
@bold token Has your question been resolved?
I tried doing this, but I think theres something fundamentally wrong. Can someone help?
@bold token Has your question been resolved?
@bold token Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey can someone help me with #5 on this
i started with partial fraction decomposition then idk what to do after
why would it be - though
just 1/(n+2)! starting at n=1
so bc it's minus it'll keep cancelling out right
i got 1/2 - 1/n+2
and because n approaches infinity i got 1/2
my answer matches with the book of the book so i think its right ty guys
.close
Closed by @unkempt vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let G = (V,E) be a simple, connected, planar, 4-regular graph.
In planar embedding, G divides the Euclidean plane exclusively into squares (with 4 corners) and triangles (with 3 corners) (including the surrounding area). The number of squares is exactly 18.
Using the Euleric Polyhedron Formula, determine the number of triangles
.```
F - |E| + |V| = 2
S is the amount of squares (18)
T is the amount of triangles.
Handshaking Lemma:
sum of all degrees = 2|E|
4 regular so 4|V| = 2|E|
|E| = 2|V|
Formulas I made up:
• 4S + 3T = the sum of all degrees = 2|E| = 4|V|
Solve by |V|:
S + ¾T = |V|
• S + T = F
now put them in the euler:
F - |E| + |V| = 2
(S+T) - 2|V| + |V| = 2
(S+T) - |V| = 2
(S+T) - (S+¾T) = 2
¼T = 2
T=8
Whats my error? Why does it stay the same regardless of S?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I don`t understand your question, T is 8 i do see a issue with the step where you substitute the expressions for |V| and simplify, but even when i did it i got T=8
ping me if you reply
@strong leaf but S simplifies out of the equation, logically I am pretty sure not every 4-regular graph has exactly 8 triangles
I assumed I made a mistake in the calculations somewhere
Can you elaborate on the issue in the step where I substitute for |V|?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@strong leaf ?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Sorry
It seems there's a consistent error in the formulation. The correct substitution should lead to an equation where both (S) and (T) contribute. Please double-check the substitution, and if needed, we can work through it step by step.
@alpine sable
It seems that way, I guess the 3T + 4S = 2E part is wrong? I have no idea why though
I guess a triangle and a square can share an edge? so the formula would need to be <= and not =
@strong leaf any hint?
Certainly! To better capture the relationship between the number of triangles ((T)) and squares ((S)) in a 4-regular planar graph, considering shared edges, you could use the following inequality:[ 3T + 4S \leq 2|E| + 2C ]
Ah, you've identified a crucial insight. In a planar graph where squares and triangles coexist, an edge can indeed be shared by both a square and a triangle. This implies that the sum of degrees formula (3T + 4S = 2|E|) might need to account for the fact that some edges are counted in both triangles and squares.
I feel bad asking this but are you pasting my messages into chatgpt or do you just text like Ai
🤣 Using text from text books
haha
guess I'll think over it a bit then lol
Here, (C) represents the count of shared edges between squares and triangles. This ensures that each shared edge is counted only once in the sum of degrees.With this adjustment, the inequality reflects the sum of degrees being less than or equal to twice the number of edges plus twice the count of shared edges.
Try this, i am not home so i can't do it my self
Dont use chatgpt, i know from experience that MF get shit wrong and when you correct it it acts like a child, oh yes like don't text books are better
yeah chatgpt isnt really good with more advanced math
i just know its style from programming-related stuff
I'll try, thx
Your problem is called a Euleric Polyhedron Formula you am google it
Dont even code using it 🤣 i trid making a CI/CD pipeline, it make me make a docker hub account( note, i didnt need it), ill try your problem
I'm lazy wtf you expect
Now help green overlord 🤣
<@&268886789983436800>
yeah that kind of attitude isn't goign to fly here
I wont even
we also have a policy against posting gpt answers, and especially without disclosing it
Bye
Bye
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ik that II is correct and III is incorrect so it must be B but hdyk I is incorrect
Find a counterexample
a constant function obviously verifies $h(x)=h(2-x)$
LF
Closed by @vapid steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I was wondering, for the Gram Schmidt process, when we change the matrix V into an orthonormal matrix E, the basis vectors of E are not necessarily i hat and j hat… but they’re just all unit vectors right?
And are perpendicular to each other*
exactly
Closed by @grizzled wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @grizzled wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Alina writes the numbers $1, 2, \dots , 9$ on separate cards, one number per card. She wishes to divide the cards into $3$ groups of $3$ cards so that the sum of the numbers in each group will be the same. In how many ways can this be done?
sxer
I have no idea
what would that common sum be?
idk
what is the sum of all the cards?
45
yes
can you think of one way to do that?
when you do find one, is there any other way to do it?
@faint monolith Has your question been resolved?
9+4+2
cant think of any other
tha dont use the same numbers
@faint monolith Has your question been resolved?
it would work, but you need three groups
oh yeah
i got another one
9,4,2
8,6,1
7,5,3
theres only two right
because the second number after 9 cannot be bigger than 5 or smaller than 4
@unkempt mica
you got it
well put
you might want to justify why that is
but you got the idea
Closed by @faint monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Deal with each digit in binary separately
Well First deal with all of the 6 digit binary numbers
And then you can do some casework on the 7 digit numbers since they have to be less than 100
@olive sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What the teacher did from 1 to 2
no, 2^log_2(x)
is it what you mean
not times
$2^log_(2)$
2^log_2(x) = x because exponentiation and logarithms are inverses
Please Correct My Grammar
and that equals to 1
not 1, x
it equals whats inside the parentheesis
kinda like this... exponentiation and logs are inverse, so it's whatever in the parenthesis
awwwww
shit
I see now
that works out, also nice handwriting
So what the teacher did on both side during "1"
they set both expressions as an exponent of 2
so how from 1. to 2. 3/2 turns to 2^(3/2)
log2(x) turns into 2^(log2(3))
but 2^(log2(3)) is equal to 3
sorry, got 3 and x mixed up
i hope that makes sense
it does makes sense
and it is such a clever manipulation
I think the question is solved
thank you so much!
np
.close
Closed by @cinder sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
you are still typing, so i reopend it
oh lol
is there anything you would like to supplement on this quesitons
i just wanted to add that just like how addition and subtration are opposites
exponents and logs are opposites as well
does addition and subtraction have a inverse relationship
yes
I see
same with multiplication and division
starting from 1, say you multiply by 5, you can go back to 1 by dividing by 5
1 * 5 = 5
5 / 5 = 1
wdym?
like two inverse functions are symmetric in terms of x=y
If my memory serves me right, thats the geometric definition of inverse functions
So when you said that addition and subtration are inverses
emm
do you want me to explain?
yes, im not sure if there are functions that can be used to represent addition and subtration
So i can put them on the plane to see if they match the circumstance(definition) of inverse functions
that's true
actually I'll let @atomic stirrup do it lol
thx lol
i think it works
you have a line like y = 3x +1
no wait
(x -1)/3 = y would be the inverse
yes
rather than just -y=-3x-1
ig you have to be wary of pemdas and of course laws of multiplication
yes, inverse means(at least in simple algebra) changing the spots of x and y then solving for y
yes exactly
not just putting y to a negative
does it means addition and substraction are not inverse
they are
see how in the inverse we are subtrating 1 instead of adding
for y = 3x +1 and -y=-3x-1 do not fit the definition of inverse functions
they do not
it is quite arbitrary, but I think we can say that addition and subtraction are not inverse functions by that
or there's something wrong in my way of thinking
if we define y to be addition then -y would be the subtraction.
you're confusing inverse functions(symmetry along y=x) with inverse operations(+/-, mult/division)
subtration is adding negative numbers
but through inverse operations you can get inverse functions
I suppose the "inverse operations" is you swapping the position of x and y in a function
emm
no, inverse functions are defined by swicthing the x and y
ohh
Then I think i have a quite abstract and self-made defination for inverse opetations
it happens lol
lets define operation A as a step forward, then if operation B is a step backward, then A and B are inverse operation
but i disagree with with that tho
i meant that in isolating variables after switching the x and y, but yes standalone my statement was wrong
yes
then integral is the inverse operation of differential
Now i have the knowledge of what a inverse operation means
I will close the channel now
thank you for your patience
Closed by @cinder sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
im glad to learn them
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am stuck with part b. How do i start it? Thank you.
@amber violet Has your question been resolved?
You just integrate
Like I said last time, you just do it by cases like the hint says
do one case first
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Q138?
@real panther Has your question been resolved?
@real panther Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was trying to find the radius of the circle, however im stuck to the step where im trying to find the lines in which it passes the center.
Then I tried doing this but got a wrong answer, Am I missing some rule? please someone help
Is it safe to assume that the center of the circle is at the half angle of the three angles and the sides opposed to the half-angle are also halved?
@bold token Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I usually use r = (area of triangle) / s (Half the perimeter of triangle) to solve for the radius of the circle inscrbied
The center of the inscribed circle indicates the intersection point of three lines which bisects each 3 angle
@bold token Has your question been resolved?
Ooo I didnt know this, thanks
Yeah thats what i was thinking aswell, but my formula says no
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose you are planning to attend a party on New Year's and you got a new trim, $t$, the day before. Does the following proposition hold?
$$
\exists M \in [0, 1).\ \textrm{clappedness}(t) > M \implies \textrm{you dodge the party}
$$
(With $\textrm{clappedness}: {\textrm{trims}} \rightarrow [0, 1]$ having the obvious mapping)
gkn1
what
is this guy an mg dude
@weak plinth Has your question been resolved?

no idea what the obvious mapping is
plus t doesn't seem to be defined...
how are we supposed to evaluate clappedness(t) even if we knew the mapping

check gkn1's message history
william
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I right? Cuz I'm losing my braincells rn
Are you sure about
[ (y - 3)^2 = y^2 - 6x + 9? ]
A Lonely Bean
Yeah cuz where does the x come from 
Well you wrote x there
💀
but my solution is still correct right assuming you ignore the x
Just pretend x isn't there and it's y
Once you replace -6x with -6y everywhere, yeah
It's still correct right
Actually wait
You forgot to subtract 32 from the right hand side
Second line in the right column; You subtracted 16 from the left hand side twice, but not from the right hand side
so it's supposed to be x²+y²-8x-6x-7=-7
Anyway, you could just cancel the 9's and get $x^2 + y^2 - 8x - 6y + 16 = 0$
A Lonely Bean
No, you subtracted 16 from the right hand side now
You should subtract 32
Whatever you subtract from the left hand side, should be subtracted from the right hand side
No need
so it goes like this then x²+y²+16x-6x=0
- You mean -8x?
- Where does -6y go?
So this is pretty much it?
This is the standard form?
if I try to solve this I get (x-4)²+(y-3)²=3²?
Jesus I wrote 6y as 6x again
That's pretty much it, yeah
[ x^2 + y^2 -8x - 6y + 16 = 0 ]
A Lonely Bean
@shut saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
what?
why power 4
