#help-0
1 messages · Page 386 of 1
You get this?
i mean yeah a is the numebr he multiplies by so like if you multiply it 100 times then y should be different should it not?
oh
so that means that he just had to multiply it by 3
right?
or something
idk
😭
yeah
ok cool
im like on the last few problems which are usually the hardest so i always get stuck on these lol
ty anyways
.close :D
Closed by @crisp hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The mean of a set of five different positive integers is 15. The median is 18. The maximum possible value of the largest of these five integers is
I used the numbers 1,1,18,19,x
but i got it wrong
because apparently you're suppose to use 1,2,18,19,x
why cant you have x2 1's though?
isnt that the smallest possibl
different
Closed by @faint monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Math is too hard
I'm leaving
.close
Closed by @echo socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to know that (arctang(x))/x^2 is decreasing on (1;inf) ?
yy
i just forgot that d/dx of arctang = 1/1+x^2 .
i thought it was something different
.close
Closed by @stable grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
missing parentheses but yes
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'd do comparison: 1/ln(n) ≥ 1/n
integral test would require you to integrate 1/ln(x), which is hard
do you know what integral test is?
yea that’s not elementary
why is that
1/n diverges
as in "why is that inequality true" or "why does this work" or "why did i choose this method"?
first
why ?
yes but how to know that witgout calculator
logarithmic functions grows slower than linear function
i think this might be something you learn the first time you see the natural log function
it is a fairly useful property
but for FORMALISM: ln is a concave function and its tangent at x=1 is y = x-1. by its concavity it lies below its own tangent, thus ln(x) ≤ x-1 < x
of course, this formally leaves the following questions unanswered:
- why is ln(x) concave
- why is its tangent at x=1 the line y=x-1
- why is x-1 < x
well i mean the third one is a given lol
u can also show the integral test diverges
all these i know
how to calculate
no, -1<0 isn't an axiom
you can't assume it to be known
if you're a hardcore formalist
y i like these type of explanations
i mean isn’t a definition
no i am now assuming but i know how to calculate them
no
the definition of -1 is "the real number whose sum with 1 is 0"
y would u ever have to prove that one number is to the left of another number on the number line when it’s just an integer
we made the number line that way
-1 is to the left of zero
it’s less
ann being too extremist here
i am being overly-formalist on purpose.
i would appreciate if you didn't call me specifically the word "extremist".
although i guess i kind of already am that, according to the laws of my home country.
no i get it it’s just strange why you wouldn’t just assume it to be a definition
unfortunate
Closed by @stable grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Closed by @cinder sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with home work it’s in a photo
@bright pier Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @bright pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get physics support here/
A string of length 3m is tied to the ceiling at points P and Q which are 2m apart. A smooth light pulley supported by the string is attached to a block of mass 6kg as shown. Find the tesion in the string.
photo ref
@drifting seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @drifting seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help explain these steps?
@glossy lion Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
sinx + cosx = k
square both sides
you'll get a 2sinxcosx there
and when you square it you also get sin squared plus cos squared
which is 1
then just find sinxcosx in terms of k
for sinx - cosx also same thing, let it be something say, A
so A = sinx - cosx
then square both sides again
after finding it in terms of k, square root it back
@glossy lion Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
helo anyone knows add math intersection of lines and circles?
,rotate
do you know calculus?
you can either use calculus or substitute and solve , proving there is only one solution
im learning add math but idk if the methods are the same as calculus?

anyway first of all start off with
completing the squares
we can do it without calculus ig
sub the line eq into the circle eq?
yes
if you don't know calculus
Use the fact that a tangent line to a circle is perpendicular to a radial line
Line
mhm
Circle
oke
oke
like this right?
lol
wait but how do i sub
express the circle purely in terms of x by using the relation between x and y from the line equation
and solve that
oh so its like simultaneous eq or?
sort of , yes
@mystic cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just want the final answer
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
if you want answers go look them up
then solve it
i want to check
strive to learn
,w integrate xe^x from 0 to 1
use wolfram to check yourself next time
what is wolfram
powerful math tool
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Closed by @fading kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove n^3 +5n is divisible by six
For n in N
I tried doing induction. But its not panning out right
I know the base case works
And it's dividable my six and 3
Can I, plug in 3k, 3k+1, 3k+2 In and see they're all divisible by 3, since those would be the remainder of things dividable by 3?
take 2 cases
when n is odd
and when n is even
when n is even it can be expressed as n = 2k
and when it is odd it can be expressed as n = 2k + 1.
that's a little hint for ya
i'm pretty sure this can still be solved with induction though, right ?
not needed
it can be proved without induction
i think both methods are equally valid ways to do it, and i'm only saying because that's the way they originally attempted to solve it
when you get to 3n^2+3n+6, you should try factoring out 3, then proving that the expression is equal to the product of one number that is divisible by 3, and one number that is divisible by 2
Then GCD is six right
yeah any number divisible by 2 and 3 must also be divisible by 6
Closed by @tough lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, wondering why the answe for part A is 80ms, we got 0.8s. Thanks!
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
0.8s is incorrect
We used Suvat and got 0.8, very confused
$\text{speed} = \frac{\text{distance}}{\text{time}}$ right?
Flappie
im autistic let me know how to do this bro
so here how to solve for time
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
S = (u+v)/2 * t
Go away
what?
Go away
what equation?
<@&268886789983436800> in appropriate comments from Don and fled
Ur initial velocity is 20ms^-1, final velocity is 0 time is to be determined and displacement is 0.8m
<@&268886789983436800> ban these fools
Thus: equation 4
Shut up
yes, did u rearrange correctly?
why use this?
how are you getting 0.8 from applying 4.
we know speed = distance/time
we have speed
and we have distance
so how to calculate time
the speed isnt constant???
Probably not ig
<@&268886789983436800>
Wait
yes
0.08s is fine
is that not correct?
0.08s = 80ms
whats the answer in the book
Why is the awsner 80ms?
80ms
ohh
because they decided to express it in ms
the value you initially typed of 0.8s was incorrect
Oh ok cool Ty
@slim chasm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slim chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the answer is p=120, q=45
Please explain how you get the P
notice that rest starts after travelling for 20km
yes im dumb for not noticing that Thank you
@mild token Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how it was simplified like this
they factorized it
Factor (t³ - 3r - 2)
but nothing is clear to me
*3t
Yes 3t, typo
np
its soo straightforward
Split -3t into -2t+(-t)
And just rerrange the terms and factor
but no t^3 not 2
No need to split them?
Do I send the solution
Rerrange those term
Think of how you can rerrange them
So you can get a common factor
@formal ginkgo
||take (t^3-t)-2(t+1)||
Only see this if you cannot find the solution
How
you could plot them
I just did it by doing this
It will be t^3*(t+1)(an polynomial term)
You just have to factor out that polynomial term
||it will factor into (t+1)(t-2)||
@formal ginkgo
.
@formal ginkgo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve this using chain rule?
You want to see the "layer of functions" if that makes sense
ya composite function.
should i take the function inside the sqrt as U?
im stuck in the middle
Uh I'm not sure what that means
But the way I see it is, the order of functions is
- Cubed
- Cotangent
- Square root
- 2-3sin(x)
ok got it lemme try again
Im not good at calculus
js practice
i ant solve it. Can u guys help me with the solution?
Yes
oh wait shit mb
i misread the question
ur gonna be using chain rule only
(2-3sinx)^1/2 is your u
and y=cot^3(u)
so find the derivative of both of them
and yeah
chain rule it
Ok wait
@little spindle Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable there are 3 composite function right ?
i can apply chain rule also in sqrt(2-3sinx))
got it
its a big fucking answer man
@little spindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @little spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
blimey
funny words
wish i could help, just beyond my current knowledge base as a second year uni student haha
i wish you luck though
i'm afraid that puts your level in math as high in this server
the more mathematically knowledgeable people usually hang out in the advanced channels
high level
yeah no
I don't think you'll find many people for that here, but maybe
yea; someone might still help u here in this channel
The help channels are mainly frequented by people who feel competent to help with high-school and early undergraduate homework.
💀
go thru this
and look below
this sounds like an internship project but weirdly phrased imo
This is hardly a math question
but who is a 3rd year Math/CS major to say
assuredly
but you showed none
idk
Just sounds complicated
meaning you may only get help from the people who can easily turn these words into the corresponding formulas
If you want help from a math server, translate the physics you know into math
Its just very niche and potentially inaccessible to anyone who doesn't already know exactly what you're doing. You might want to try stack exchange
and as much as this server may seem big
There aren't actually that many people, that would be able to do this for you
server is for maths; not science
Anthracenequinone is a 24-atom molecule. It sounds like you're being asked to solve its electron structure numerically right from the Schrödinger equation, which sounds more like a thesis project than a test question...
take the physics away, ask in the relevant advanced channel, in simpler steps, like help with some computations or some system/behavior, and you may already get much more help
hence me mentioning internship
You might be able to get some methodological sparring in #modeling or #numerical-analysis, but not on the level of "here's how you solve this problem".
listen to tropo not me
I'm definitely not the most knowledgeable here
Its a forum online. You will find people with a similar hanging out there, tho communication tends to be slower there
.
Claymore
LaTeX source sent via direct message.
Well actually the text cheatsheeet can help if he doesn't know latex
Okay nvm he seems to know what he's doing
.
Claymore
layed
I strongly suspect that to make your problem tractable, you'll need computational techniques developed specifically for in silico chemistry, so you'll need advice from active researchers in that or a related field (hopefully you have an advisor fitting that description!). Almost certainly there will exist specialized software you can at least use as a starting point, but mathematicians will not know about that.
Pretty sure the bigmans right
Don't mind my intrusion and personal comments, but I find it quite suspicious that you transitioned from addressing middle school/high school questions to claiming expertise in "PhD in quantum physics" after looking through your message history.
your LaTeX also seems more so a symbol salad rather than an articulated excerpt of what a PhD student would be writing as well
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help understanding this:
how it becomes this:
my textbook says that after taking out the last two equations, we get the second pic ^
original being:
L1 being equation 1
this is about vectors
Don't you just add up the eqations?
I mean yeah, but how did they get to L1+L2-L3+L4
What is actually the question of the problem?
is there more written than what you have pasted?
just transformations
uhh
idk how to call it in English
surely they're not concluding that based on the first screenshot
and while you can conclude it from the second, it would be hard to do so if you didn't already know the answer
I understood exactly nothing
whatsoever
neither from the textbook
neither from the help I've received so far
you have this
question being linear dependence or no
ugu gaga
this
conclusion:
well you can obviously check that L1 + L2 - L3 + L4 = 0 from this
I agree
but the question is, how would you have known that
yes
what's the last line of this chain of transformations
It's equation 4 with 2*equation 1
with the aim of understanding if the equations are linearly dependent or not
(the 4 of them)
from this step ^ did you try subtracting the last row from the one above it?
i'm surprised the book didn't do that explicitly
yes
what did you get?
where did the 4th line go?
and you have to include the parts with the L1,L2,L3,L4
if you compute this:
minus this:
you should get L1 + L2 - L3 + L4
I've received help from elsewhere
explanation:
I+II-III+IV=0
.close
Closed by @vocal tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did the 1 come from?
I just guessed the formula
well like
you notice how it goes like 3, 5, 7, ...?
I don’t remember how yes
OH
wait no I don’t get it
basically the thing is like
you can represent odd numbers by the formula 2n+1
and even numbers by 2n
assuming n is an integer
like 2(1) + 1 = 3
2(2) +1 = 5 and so on
mm maybe explain what you don't get?
So it’s 1 because it’s an odd number
yeah
Every time
exactly
But I remember like how I got taught a formula to learn this
It’s was like difference minus something idk
using Ur intuition rather than like some formula is fine as well
dw about it
Yeah but what if there’s harder questions like this
well idk what formula you are talking about
again DW about it until it comes your way or Ur teacher tells u about it or something
what class is this meant to be?
Lmao yeah ur right u just put the number in lol
It’s algebra
its an arithmetic progression
What’s that
a sequence of numbers with a common difference
where the common difference = currentterm - previousterm
or
nextterm - currentterm
Oh yeah I understand that
the second term - first term = common difference
right?
Yeah
also the third term - second term = common difference
Yes
But number next to the difference
so the generalization is
nth term - n-1th term = common difference
nth term = n-1th + common difference
can I continue?
@alpine sable
Is that what u just explained or is this something new bc now I dont get it
its a generalized form of what i explained
nth term (current term)
n-1th term(previous term)
Yeah ok
Continue
now lets use letters to represent the terms
a is first term
n is nth term(or the number of the term eg 1st 2nd 3rd)
d is common difference
2nd term = a + d (but:2-1=1 and d= 1d)
2nd term = a + (2-1)d
3rd term = 2nd term + d
but second term = a + d
therefore: 3rd term = (a +d )+ d
3rd term = a + 2d (but:3-1=2)
3rd term = a + (3-1)d
so the generalization here is for any term n;
nth term = a + (n-1)d
@alpine sable
Yes I’m going though it I’m trying rlly hard to understand
maybe try watching an eddie woo vid for more help though
I’ve never heard of him
the letters are just generalization
it'll take a while for me to elaborate
Wow he’s like famous lmao never heard of him
Only use the chemistry tutor guy
i also too
thats where i learnt stuff on polar coordinates
The thing is that I’m learning this in swedish so English terms become new to me
nice
oh
But ty have a good day
should i translate
Closed by @fair hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the following series $$\frac12+\frac13+\left(\frac12\right)^2+\left(\frac13\right)^2+\left(\frac12\right)^3+\left(\frac13\right)^3+\ldots$$ How can I determine whether or not it converges or diverges? Here the ratio test fails I guess, so maybe the root test?
Philip
Looks like it's two separate series.
try writing it as a sum
well, then $a_{2n}=\left(\frac12\right)^{n+1}$ and $a_{2n+1}=\left(\frac13\right)^{n+1}$.
Philip
why 2n?
just write it as an and bn
if one of them diverges then total diverges
if you can show that they both converge, then an+bn converges
but can I just rearrange the order of summation?
writing the series above as two separate series would require to rearrange the terms, no?
but it's infinite addition
i could do $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^2 = 4^2+5^2+6^2+.... + 100^2+101^2 + 1^2 +2^2+3^2 + 102^2+103^2 +...$
Flappie
You can if all the terms are positive.
n^2>0 for all natural numbers n
no its not
if we simply rearaange, we get two geometric series, right?
because you still need to show that $\\sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac12\right)^n + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac13\right)^n$ converges
Flappie
ok
and to show that the sum of these sums converges, we need to show that each sum converges
and those you can check with ratio/root test
yeah 👍
@limpid shore Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @limpid shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Through the middle M of the arc AC of the circumscribed circle of the triangle △ABC, a chord (MN) parallel to AB is drawn.
Show that the arcs BNC and MCN are congruent.
Let me get the drawing rq
We have to prove that the angle formed by the blue is equal to the angle formed by the red
<@&286206848099549185>
Which is which it's not clear
Red and blue?
Yes
Why not forget the black part bc its their intersection and just proof with the green ones
Prove the triangles that form the green are congruent?
I don't have an idea yet lol but im just saying if we can proof the green angles are equal we're done
That may help
This is not true
Thats the question mate.
Are the yellow angles given to be congruent?
It says that M is the middle of arch AC
So M is the bisector
Of AOC
OM i mean
Oh I misread I thought N was the middle of arc BC
Let me take a look
Not sure.
It suffices to show NOM=BOC
the angles
And we can find those
<BOC=180-(<CBO+<BCO)
And
<MON=360-(<AOB+2<AOM)
You can rewrite all angles in terms of A,B, and C
This is because <BON=<AOM due to MN being parallel to AB
Let me see.
Dont really understand this part
I totally agree with the rest
To be exact, the 2*AOM part
@scarlet drum Has your question been resolved?
Im the only one doing geometry on Christmas day lol
Try to rewrite all the angles I mentioned with A,B,C
You mean in terms of A, B and C?
Or like rename them to A B and C
Yeah
BOC is 180 - B - C
Let me think about MON...
Cant figure it out
BOC is equal to A right
I tried to use that information
Got stuck again.
@scarlet drum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
System of Equations
$e^x \cos y=0$ and $-e^x \sin y =0$
Professional Procrastinator
I know there is no real solution because cos and sin can’t be zero at the same time, but why doesn’t this work:
$e^x(\cos y -\sin y)=0$
\
Adding them
$e^x \neq 0, so \cos y= \sin y$
Professional Procrastinator
well, it’s just an example of a one-way implication that doesn’t go back the other way, once you know cos(y) = sin(y) , you can just check the values of y for which this is true and realize that none of these yield any solutions to the original equation
Ok
.close
Closed by @marsh forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do b?
@vagrant agate Has your question been resolved?
oh so if it isnt the radius it isnt on the circle?
yeh
if you know the definition of a circle (NOT only the general form of its equation) then this should be clear as day
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@vagrant agate you can satisfied the co ordinate with the equation of circle, you can find the equation of circle by radius and centre.😀 and if this point satisfied then it is on point and if the not satisfied then it is not lies on the circle.
🪵 I know it is not according to question but you can also check it by this🪵
@near hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @near hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What would the contrapositive of this statement be?
"If Sup(A) and Inf(A) exist ∀A⊆N, then (N,≤) is complete"
Mainly confused on the "∀A⊆N" part; does it become "∃A !⊆ N"?
$\neg(\forall x(P(x)))=\exists x(\neg P(x))$
SWR
I'm trying to prove that (N,≤) is complete. So I stated that the contrapositive of the definition of completeness is "If (N,≤) is not complete, then ∃A ⊆ N s.t. Sup(A) or Inf(A) D.N.E." (which is easy to prove).
$A\subseteq N\leftrightarrow \forall x(x\in A \rightarrow x\in N)$
SWR
Since you're negating the "or", wouldn't it become an "and" here?
Whoops, that was a typo.
If so then I think your contrapositive is alright.
It is not
This is still incorrect
Yeah but what they stated here is correct isn't it?
Ehhhh I guess it's correct? It's written weird
What do you mean?
SWR
^That is what I mean by !⊆
Can you explain why the subset does not get "negated" but the supremum and infimum do?
I would have guess that "Sup(A) and Inf(A) exist ∀A⊆N" becomes "Sup(A) and Inf(A) D.N.E. ∃A !⊆ N"
when all hell breaks loose start drawing truth tables 😭
The statement is basically "if this holds for all such A, then N is complete". If you take the contrapositive, it means that "if N isn't complete, then it must not be that case that it holds for all A subset of N (i.e. it doesn't hold for some A)"
So A is still a subset of N regardless, because the original statement said nothing about sets that aren't subsets of N
$\forall (A\subseteq N)((N,\le)$ is complete$)$ is shorthand for $\forall A(A\subseteq N\to (N,\le)$ is complete$)$. Do you know how to negate logical implication?
SWR
OH
Hang on I suck at latex
$\exists A(A \subseteq N \wedge \neg((N,\le)$ is complete)$)$
gian
Exactly correct
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Okay just to double check that I understand:
Let $A \subseteq \mathbb{N}$.
$p \coloneqq$ "Sup(A) and Inf(A) exist"
$q \coloneqq$ "$(\mathbb{N},\le)$ is complete."
I'm trying to show that $\forall A (p) \to q$ is true. I can instead show that the contrapositive is true, which is:
$\neg q \to \exists A (\neg p)$
gian
So like Azyrashacorki mentioned, A is a subset of N regardless, and what I'm trying to prove has nothing to do with A being a subset of N
wouldn't it be p(A)?
$[\forall A p(A)] \Rightarrow q$
Katharine
it should be the entire thing implies q
so if the statement in [] is true
that implies q
is what you're trying to prove
right?
Yes
I forgot to include the larger brackets
I don't know correct notation I'm learning as I go
although maybe the (A) isn't even necessary
all the notation is for clarity
if your notation makes it clear
it's fine
most of the time standard notation is the clearest
and so you use that
such as the forall sign
and the there exists
and not
etc
any
anyway
$(\forall A, p) \Rightarrow q$
Katharine
Katharine
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wary mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Use the subspace test to deternine if the set of all functions f in $F(-\infty, \infty)$ where $f(0) = 1$ is a subspace of $F(-\infty, \infty)$
Derivative
so first we check if the set is non empty
and it is not empty so thats good
then we check axiom 1
$(f+g)(0) = f(0) + g(0) = 1+1 = 2$
Derivative
this should be equal to 1
so it fails
it fails because any f(0) = 1 so also (f+g)(0) must equal 1, but it does not
so it is not a subspace
is this good?
yes
thanks!
another question i have
for All functions f in from neg infinity to pos infinity for which f(-x) = f(x)
how do i go about this
i was thinking of creating two functions f and g
and then doing f(x) - f(-x) = g(x) -g(-x)
where i get
f(x) + g(-x) = g(x) + f(-x)
since f(-x) = f(x) then
f(x) + g(x) = f(x) + g(x)
so it is closed under addition
wouldnt you want to show that (f+g)(-x) = (f+g)(x) ?
ah i see
i also did that on my paper i did it both ways didnt know which one is valid
ig the latter is the right way
im just not sure of what you are doing
so (f+g)(-x) = f(-x) + g(-x) = f(x) + g(x)
yesd
closed under addition
yes
now for axiom 6
(cf)x = cf(x) = cf(-x)
closed under scalar multiplication. therefore it is a subspace
yes
one more question
show that f is a subscape of C[0,1] where f(0) = f(1)
so first, it is nonempty, obviously
next, let f and g be functions. then: (f+g)(0) = f(0) + g(0) = f(1) + g(1) = (f+g)(1). Closed under addition
next, for scalar multiplication (axiom 6): (kf)(0) = kf(0) = kf(1) = (kf)(0). Closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore it is a subspace
seems good to me
Closed by @quick dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you work this out by rewriting this linear FODE?
considering that rate of change of price is p'(t)
p'(t) = 3*Excess of demand over supply
The solution gives an example using a seperable FODE but I'm trying to work it out using the linear way
What's FODE
Ohh
Integrating factor equations
Okay
Think how can you mathematically write excess of demand over supply
qD(p) - qS(p)
Substituted everything into the method given but something seems off
Using this, eliminate C
Let me try
p(0) = p(0)?
, w y'(x) = 3*((10-2y)/3-2y+6)
Yeah for some reason that's p(0)
p(0)=C+7/2
C=7/2-p(0)
$p(t) = [\dfrac{7}{2} - p(0)] e^{-8t}+\dfrac{7}{2}$
Ericsson
Nvm, this should be what you will get
I see
Closed by @jade fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
i need help with this
image incoming?
Hi garlic
Hello garlic
First, how many petals does it have?
what u see is all i know
Its a cos(n*theta) function with an even n, do you remember how many petals you would have?
its 4 correct?
Yup
@thin sinew Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thin sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
^
53 seconds · Clipped by apricity · Original video "Application Of Integrals - Class 12 Maths | NCERT for Boards & CUET" by Apni Kaksha
why did he divide x^3/x+1 ?
and I cannot comprehend how he wrote it afterwards
this
they divided / did long division since the degree of the numerator was greater than the denominator
looking at the result of division,
you'll have a polynomial and a rational function with a constant numerator which have established rules for easy integration
do you know polynomial long division? @fading kestrel
yeah
that is what the guy did
i understand we simplied for the ease of integration
but
i cant make out how we
reached here
polynomial long division
the first expression is the quotient
one sec
gimme a min
no i still dont get it
look
can you do the long division for this
quotient + (remainder)/(original denom)
it is kind of like converting an improper fraction into a mixed number
like 29/7 = 4 + 1/7
same kind of deal
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
but that mixed fraction notation isn't applicable when variables are invovled
(its also pretty crap by many peoples opinion)
all my life nobody told me that
so you mean i gotta write the + when i got variables?
fuck
you lost me
my doubt has been cleared
tis frustrating
with numbers:
$$4\frac17 = 4 + \frac17$$
with variables or a mix of numbers and variables
$$a\frac bc = \frac {ab}{c}$$
$$a \frac 2d = \frac{2a}{d}$
why did it dissapear
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yes. i said a + would be needed to represent a sum
like this
without the +, that's what writing stuff like that would represent
to make it clear, if you want to represent
$$a + \frac bc$$
you'd have to write stuff like
$$a + \frac bc$$
as $a \frac bc = \frac{ab}{c}$
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
man i thought that $a \frac bc$ was equal to $\frac{ca+b}{c}$
neo
$\frac{ac + b}{c}$ is what you'd get if you combined $a + \frac bc$ into a single fraction
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
it all comes down to when variables are present
$$a \frac bc = a \times \frac bc \redneq a + \frac bc$$
fuck
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
the notation is crap btw, and if you intend multiplication, you should explicitly write the multiplication there anyway
like a doubt from years ago got cleared today
thank you very much man @gray isle
and thanku @vale wigeon
.close
Closed by @fading kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
