#help-0
1 messages · Page 385 of 1
you have 1 to 9 and 7 to 9
integral from 1 to 9 - integral from 7 to 9 tho
but yes that's the idea
thanks
for b
i dont have g(u)
what do I do?
a is -√2
d too
I only was able to answer a and c , both = to -√2
@vale crag 😅
you have a damn lot of questions lol
its a dummy variable
you could replace every u or t variable with a banana and it won't make a difference to the value of the integral
sorry
I am a starter in this lesson
how come
f(x) is not like g(x)
$\int_a^b f(x) \dd{x} = \int_a^b f(u) \dd{u} = \int_a^b f(\smiley) \dd{\smiley}$
really?
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
not sure what you're getting at
f(2) by itself is different from f(5) by itself yes
but that doesn't really say much
mhm ok thanks I understand now
moving to a new lesson now 😄
fundemental theorm of calculus
lets see
ill close this
thanks
.close
Closed by @grizzled zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Thinking either c or d
What have you tried
not sure what to do
$\frac{r}{s} - \frac{r+1}{s+1} < 0$
Lorentz
You can rewrite it like this
Generally it's best to not cross multiply for inequalities
In usually leads to loss of a solution
hmm true
u will do LCM here?
Ye
aight got it
and u can't do it always
It would be fine for this I think, but I meant generally
Hmm
hmm
cross m after transposition or before?
before
imho, using cross multiplication might be simpler for OP
So I’m thinking a)
Lorentz
The denominator is always positive so it's the numerator that matters
wat is f(x)
Is the pic loading?
yh
f(x) can be 0, x cannot
can’t be 0
instead of considering difference of two fractions, you can using cross multiplication, so that you only have plus sign, and you don't have minus sign
it's given that both r and s are positive numbers, so you can multiply both sides by rs, expand and cancel out rs on both sides
gotcha
question seems messed up
This one no?
Ig the only value f(x) cannot be is 3
But that isn't one of the options
Oh
how’d you get that
For the options you sent, i just equated f(x) to each of the options and saw if there was a value of x or not
But then I found 5/x cannot be 0, so 3 + 5/x cannot be 3
so it’s not 0, it’s 3
Yeah the value of function is undefined for x=0
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so what I did first was split 2^x+2
so i got
(2^x)^2 - 12 x 2^x = 64
and then I replaced the 2^x with y
so y^2 - 12y -64
and I got the two values -4, and 16
but what do I do after that?
also, this question
Here I don't even know where to begin,
I did
8x^-3/2x^-1/3
2x^-6/2x^-1/3
how did you turn $8x^{-3}$ into $2x^{-6}$...?
Ann
don't use the letter x as a multiplication symbol.
you got that the possible values for y are that. now, given y = 2^x as you yourself said, solve for x.
@willow mist Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Have they integrated tan x wrong here?
I thought the integral of tan x is -ln cos x
since cos x differentiates into -sinx x, so the negative signs cancel and it becomes sin x/cos x = tan x
How did they get sec x
integration tan x can be represented by various formulas
and i mean
VARIOUS
one of them in ln sec x
Closed by @long panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trying to use Taylor’s to get to the result 2 but it’s not working at all
It really does
I changed it to be able to use Taylor's approximation but it didn't get me anywhere
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Dude 2 mins ago it wasn't
Calculate ln(3n+1)/ln n, and also ln(n^2+n)/ln n
first
which should be easy enough
it is what it is
Chill bro :/
then n^2/ln(e^(n^2)+1)=n^2/(n^2+ln(1+e^(-n^2))=1/(1+ln(1+e^(-n^2))/n^2)=1/(1+0)=1
@dawn crest
So I should start like this?
yeah
Now I get this instead but the result is supposed to be 2 
shouldnt this be log(n^2)=2log(n)?
Omfg you’re right I’m a dumbass
then you should get the exact same thing but with a 2 instead of a 1 there
well you could've just used lhopi
for this awful expression?
Yes exactly
for the ln terms
I didn’t think of it because I would rather die than integrate the full thing but it would’ve made sense for the separate terms…
Sorry I meant differentiate
yeah i meant using lhopital for the seperate terms
instead of taylor
Thank you sm for helping me solve it
I was struggling for no reason
.close
Closed by @dawn crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this seem right?
Its on the terminal side, however, it lies outside the unit circle
👍
Closed by @wild kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
I'm asking a question
what...
I'm gonna fail English if I don't find the answer
is it math related though?
if not it doesn't belong here
Everything in life can be math related
Am I wrong?
Flappie why are you so against me
???
are you doubling down on your intentions to post questions not related to math curriculums in channels intended for them?
Closed by @dry ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I'm done
because that isn't a good idea if you intended to use this server as a resource for actual math questions in the futhre
I study math in a different language so it's not really helpful when I ask math related questions
Because idk the mathematical terms in English
you can just ask in your language
"Given three positive real numbers a, b, c satisfying a + b + c = 3, prove that:
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
see command
Can someone help please
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
oh okay thank you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
draw the point directly below C on the x-axis
ok I did, what do I call it
these?
here look at AOD and DEC
O is (0,0) ?
yes
now what do you see about these triangles
they look kinda alike dont they?
what can we say about them
how do I know that they are the same for fact?
oh
yea
so now what is angle DEC?
exactly
so we have OB/CE = BA/CB = AO/BE
i think you know how to go from here
this will help me find B C and D ?
yes it will
do I need to calculate the distances first?
oh yea makes sense
so how do I get the values for this equation
have you had crossmultiplcation?
I know what it means if thats what you ask
ight
when you say we know CE what exactly do you mean?
well, what did we define point E as?
ce/ao?
d formula
Hey flipflop message me if you need any help in math
@lofty creek so CE/BO
distance = sqrt((x2-x1)^2+(y2-y1)^2 right?
but here x2 and x1 is the same by definition
so x2-x1=0
thus the distance is y2-y1
which are both given
so this is the distance?
@lofty creek when you say we have OB what do you mean?
I did not calculate the distance there
here
oh ok
then I write OB = x
we dont know that yet
yes
and the distance of OA is 1 since it's Y = 1
without knowing EB I can't tell you that
or OB
I would say 6(ce)/x(ob)
@lofty creek is this correct^
that looks correct, yes
so with this multiplication factor
we can go from OA to BE
right?
yes
so do that
so x = 0
???????
6/x = 0/1 ?
I dont have B's X so how would I know
I just know that OB = x by what you determined
did you say earlier that EB is 3?
i said assuming
for an example
not that it actually is 3
BE is what we want to solve
can you help me a bit with how to solve for BE I'm getting lost
make sense now?
A = (0,1)
B = (x,0)
C = (?,6)
E = (?,0)
CE = 6
OB = x
BE = ?
OA = 1
yes?
in the middle its bc/ab right
yes
ok hold on I'll write it down and come up with an answer
$\frac{CE}{OB}=\frac{BC}{AB}=\frac{BE}{OA}$
Flappie
is this enough information to use this equation?
yes why not??????
you seem to be upset with me... I'm not trying to waste your time, I'm genuinely struggling with this
I forgot most of this material
but thats not what youre telling me
my issue here is that I don't have the distance for be and ob
youre telling me you know one thing
then i ask you that one thing
and you dont know it
I know cross multiplication
we have OB
its x
so then BE = OA*CE/OB
so i wrote down 6/x =
yes but after that I don't know how to continue
what would be the x coordinate of C
I don't know what you mean by that
he is asking abscissa
so then we must have OE
which is the x value of OE
and we defined E as having the same x value as C
so x value of C is=?
whats that
P(x,y) , x-> abscissa , y-> ordinate
C = x + BE ?
fr?
i legit have no clue what abscissa is
Ok
u have used it but never knew the name
interesting
did we calculate the value of BE ?
WE ALREADY HAVE BE
.
sorry
memory loss?
alright so its 6/x
u forgot the equation now didnt u?
look its really simple for you and a lot more complicated for me. Can you tell me how to write down the equation or formula or how to plug that fkin shit in because that might help me understand it for the next rectangle that I'll solve
i already gave you the formula
C = x + BE , you have be = 6/x
.
substitute better word
.
let me write it down
c = x + 6/x
ok thats what I wrote
nice
i gtg srry
its ok... I appreciate the help
Oh np, any doubts u could dm him
its just not for my level..
What grade are you in
It's not about grade.. I'm completing mathematics after 10 years of not doing it
What
How old are you?
27
I'm in a class with a bunch of people my age struggling with this shit too funny enough
you tend to forget most of this stuff after 10 years of not doing it
.close
Closed by @ebon torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the zero of the polynomial - p(x) = 2x^2 + 3x - 2
use the quadratic formula
no need
just factorise it
by splitting the middle term
it will be faster 💯
u just need to plug in values into the quadratic formula
much simpler
true
its faster
i meant factorizing is faster
I am getting an introductory lesson to polynomials...so in my exercise the highest degree of the polynomial was 1 in the questions for finding the zero of the polynomial...so I was wondering if we can find the zero of a polynomial where degree is more than 1?
so I guess cubic formula would work when degree is 3. but what if the degree is 10?
or a really large number....Does it mean that for a degree of 10 there will be ten soln as zeroes of the polynomial....and is there any way to find out the zero of it?
an important skill when working with polynomials is to factor them (split them into lower degree polynomials multiplied together)
for example
3x² - 2x - 8 = (3x+4)(x-2)
the zeroes of the degree 2 polynomial on the left correspond to the zeros of the two degree 1 polynomials on the right.
There are general formulas for the zeroes of polynomials of degrees 1-4. polynomials of degree 5 and higher can only be solved exactly if they can be factored (which they can't always), but there are many techniques to find approximate zeroes.
Closed by @rose mulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea how to solve this
is it equal to 4?
yeah
id move one of the fourth roots to the other side
one way you could approach this is to move one radical to the right
then raise it to the fourth power
yeah, I need to solve it by replacing something with a variable
but I don't know what
u mean like some sort of u sub
yeah but for not calc i assume
I don't know how to explain this, some parts of equation
See if each term can both be 2
Or if it can be 1+3, 0+4, etc.
Raising both sides to the fourth power should work, but it's very difficult
,w solve (18+5x)^(1/4)+(64-5x)^(1/4)=4
yeah there is a solution with replacing something but I can't find it
yea ik an algebraic sub
@steel garnet Has your question been resolved?
@steel garnet Has your question been resolved?
replace first root with a, second with b, you'll get system of equations
okay, I will try
I don't understand, I just get a+b = 4
also notice that $a^4+b^4=82$
Alisia
wait what if I replace 18 + 5x with A and make a 18 + 5x from the second root also and also replace it with A
then I get ⁴√a + ⁴√(82-a) = 4
it would be harder to work with that
wait how you got this?
$(18+5x)+(64-5x)=82$
Alisia
and how this?
what do you mean?
I don't understand where it came from
Alisia
yes I know that but I still don't understand
what happens when you put each root in 4th degree?
Do I have to move one of them to other half to do this?
no
just see what happens when you put each root in 4th degree, then sum the 2 results
so I just multiply both of them by itself?
no, put in 4th degree
like this
wait so I get 18 + 5x + 64 - 5x then?
yes
here it is
@steel garnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there some type of rule for this stuff ?
3rd i think
technically none of these are right
well the first one is most correct i think
since anything can be written as itself over 1
When they say "fraction" I presume they mean rational number

but hayley still brings a good point
irrational numbers can't be written as fractions
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
One ought to define what a fraction is.
SWR
sure they can, $\pi = \f\pi1$
hayley
I meant the root of 2 can't be written as a fraction
We haven’t done pi or radical fractions or whatever
you know what they say abt presumptions, they make a pres out of ump and me
anyway
they clearly do, but the third one isn't right either on the surface
When you multiply an irrational number with a rational number, what do you get?
in terms of a rule: rational numbers can always be written as terminating or repeating decimals
$\frac{\sqrt{2}}{1}$
SWR
Irrational?
or at least potentially irrational
is it not always irrational?
So, what do you know about irrational numbers?
nope, exercise to you to figure out why
[\scalebox{0.2}{\text{bully}}]
Flappie
Flappie, stop using mathmode and \text 
never
PROOF BY COUNTEREXAMPLE OR RIOT
Suppose it's not irrational then you'll get a contradiction that the irrational number can be written as a fraction.
I chose the 3rd one
Is that right
that's the one that seems the most correct yeah
if u multiply by zero
Ok thx
It says non-zero rational
I'd just change that to "potentially nonrepeating"
oh
^
oh yea
the question says nonzero
.close
Closed by @vernal kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
isosceles triangle because 45 45 90, then pythagorean
Closed by @spare fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand how:-
what do you not understand
How this product applied to independent events?
are you asking why $\m\P{A\given B} = \m\P A$ given an independent event $A$?
No, that I understood.
[
\m\P{A\cap B} = \m\P A \cd \m\P B
]
basically
following [
\m\P{A\given B} = \f{\m\P{A\cap B}}{\m \P B}
]
I see. One more question.
Could you please explain me this?:-
From what I understood, shouldn't this be just P (A or B) = P(A) + P(B)?
Why we need this part?:-
no
that means the two probabilities are disjoint
being disjoint is NOT the same as being independent
common mistake you should be careful of
Closed by @crude birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
hi
sorry i cant read your handwriting
that doesnt work
what cant you read
why 
try expressing both sides of the equation using the same base
does that mean i can do log(x^3) = ... and because of the fact that all the logs have the bases 10 we must not write the logs and can solve the equation after x
?
just minus and plus
into?
no, but you can use that $\log(3x)=\log(3)+\log(x)$ and it will work
Alisia
that's one approach
Are you sure with the ln?
ln(3x)
into log(3) + log(x)
why ln? you went from base e to base 10 as i see
oh that. Yes ofc sorry 😅
@cosmic acorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the problem?
is $hg(x) = h\circ g(x)=h(g(x))$?
Flappie
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
oh ok
I don't know this circle notation
did you write x-3=x-3 no solutions?
yes
isnt it all x?
for all x this equation is satisfied
also
g(h(x)) is not correct
g(x)=x-3
h(x)=x^2
$g(h(x))=g(x^2)=x^2-3$ right?
Flappie
yes
that is also correct though
yes but right now what you did is that you plugged h(g(x))=(x-3)^2 into both sides
you need to do: $\g(h(x)) = h(g(x))\x^2-3=(x-3)^2$
Flappie
hmm
this has no solutions though
I've tried it
Flappie
not sure how you got that though
oh wait 💀
💀
but well what's wrong with my other method
what other method?
this one?
here you wrote h(g(x))
but you never actually inserted it
you just ignored it and replaced it with g(x)^2
which is g(h(x))
hmm but then why does it lead to a solution 😭
it doesnt lol
what youre doing there is (x-3)^2=(x-3)^2
and the taking the root
which is quite obviously nonsense
yeah true
but when i take the root
it makes one of them plus minus right?
i feel like this concept of adding plus minus with root is messed up in my brain
Jug
but then
this is like saying $\1=1\1^2=1^2\1=\pm 1\1=1 \lor 1=-1$
which obviously makes no sense
Flappie
💀 true
why can't we say $\pm x=\pm8$ here btw
Jug
im probably asking the dumbest question ever
you mean here?
yeah
if you mean this, this is then always true
assume x=12
then -x=-12
because (-1)*x = (-1)*12
?
yeah
but here if we got -x=-8 then x=-8 wouldn't be a solution
so why is it that only 8 is plus minus and not x?
even though x had the root as well
but thats not what youre saying
youre saying
$\pm x=\pm 8$
Flappie
so this says $x=8\lor-x=-8$
Flappie
if you said $x=\pm8$
Flappie
Flappie
this is correct in the sense that when x is positive, 8 also is stricly positive and same for the negative sign
$like the other guy explained $1^2 = 1^2 wont imply 1 = \pm 1 but rather implies \pm 1 = \pm 1 $
sorry if that hurt, i shall call you flappie from now on
and what happened to latex?
oh
$1^2 = 1^2 wont imply 1 = \pm 1 but rather implies \pm 1 = \pm 1 $
texit does not seem to be working
but for x there, +8 and -8 are solutions right?
yes
if we do $\pm x=\pm 8$ then x=+8 always
Jug
Lol
Your latex broken?
Its okay 😔
nova left a gap at the end
no wait hold on, if x^2 = 8^2, then x = $ \pm 8$
+x = + 8
Its broke
and -x = -8
Flappie
Nvm, still works
which results to x=8
yes
so no x=-8
sometimes another notation is used where we write -+x = +-8
in that case -x = +8
and +x = -8
yep
which case is correct though
$\pm = -\mp$
Flappie
look closer, both equations essentially mean the same thing -x = +8 is same as +x = -8
yeah
$In summary \pmx = \pm8 states that x = 8 whereas \mpx = \pm8 states that x = -8$
nova
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
but im saying $\pm x=\pm 8$ results to $x=8$ and $x=\pm 8$ which is commonly written results to $x=+8$ and $x=-8$
$\pm x=\mp 8 = \left{x=-8\-x=8$
Flappie
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Jug
$x = \pm 8 is correct for the quadratic equation x^2 = 8, but when \pmx = \pm8 it strictly means x=8 or -x=-8 and thats it$
nova
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
oof latex aint gonna work today
$x = \pm 8 is correct for the quadratic equation x^2 = 8, but when \pm x = \pm8 it strictly means x=8 or -x=-8 and thats it$
Jug
$x = \pm 8$ is correct for the quadratic equation $x^2 = 8$, but when $\pm x = \pm 8$ it strictly means $x=8$ or $-x=-8$ and thats it
Jug
ohh thanks
hope it makes sense now
so we just do the plus minus on one side for the quadratic equation solution?
yes
only and only on one side
if you do on both side then there will be only one solution which is not true for a quadratic equation unless the equation has equal roots
even in the equal roots case you are still writing $\pm$ but this time it will be operated on 0 and +0 and -0 are the same anyways
nova
Closed by @lethal dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Having an issue with part b, i have no working and dont know what the division identity is. Idont know how to link the remainders of each factor together
Just need a hint and a point in the right direction
bruh why is ur text rainbow

FashionTex
wait i think thats too much info
We have that
[\wrb*{\t{Dividend} = \t{Quotient}\cd\t{Divisor} + \t{Remainer}}
]
Pure
I dont understand how to link those components together, im a bit stuck
For example
12 divided by 5 gives quotient of 2 and remainder of 2.
[\unb{\77{12}}{\t{dividend}} = \unb{\7Z{2}}{\t{quotient}} \cd \unb{\7R{5}}{\t{divisor}} +\unb{\7P{2}}{\t{remainder}}]
Pure
this is all you need for the answer
okay
Yeah
thank you
magic
@hallow mortar Has your question been resolved?
Hi pure, I still cant figure it out can ou give me another hint
please
Do you know what the Division Identity is?
It's basically what Pure showed.\\
$P(x) = Q(x)\cdot D(x) + R(x)$
Kookiemon
Oh yes i know that but i just dont know how to use that in this question
unless does it just want me to work back and find the quotient
and original poly
So let's refer back to the question real quick.
Notice that it states that P(x) is divided by (x-1)(x+2). Where does (x-1)(x+2) go in the Division Identity?
Divisor
Yes
So given that P(1) = 2, how can you write out the Division Indentity using the information you are given?
P(x)= Q(x)(x-1) + 0x+2
i think ive been approaching the whole problem wrong, ive been treating P(1) as dividing by (x-1) and P(-2) as dividing by x+2.
Yeah, that would be a problem.
Let me give you a hint on how to think about the problem.
so P(1) would be written as Q(1)(1-1)(1+2)+a+b=1
P(-2) would be written as Q(-2)((-2-1)(-2+2) -2a+b = 5
oh i get it
thanks b=3
You almost have it.
You need to replace x in each one, not a.
Looks like you got the correct answer anyways.
.close
Closed by @hallow mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do I look at the table side that’s X or f(x) for -1
So I would look at the x side right
yes. what's f(9)?
-3?
Yes
Tysm
.close
Closed by @vernal kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
This is similar and i would do the same thing right?
I looked at the X side domain
For 4
f(x) is an element in the range here
so think of f(x) as something where you input a value of x and it spits something out
@vernal kite Has your question been resolved?
The range is 4 so the domain is 2
@vernal kite
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
7.43
Do you mind trying to take a clip of the question, instead of a whole side?
It's gonna be sideways tho
😭
All fine, throw it up.
Oh I didn't knowni could just switch thst
Thats awkward
Uhm
It's the suppose y is jointly
Porportional
Thst thing
ye
This might be something that I haven't been into. So you might want to wait for another person.
Hi again
oh hello
when y is jointly proportional to x_1 ~x_100
uh
It means that y is directly proportional to each of the x_i's
so y=k * x_1 * x_2 * ... * x_100 for some constant k
ok ty
ah right
you mean k?
well anyway
i honestly have no clue all ik is that its like (x_1 .....x_25)3
Yes because jiri tripled EACH of the 25 intergers
Alright then
I'm following now
so
uhm
im confused now
like
what am i supposed to do with this lol
i dont understand no
It's the same thing
ah