#help-0

1 messages · Page 371 of 1

echo socket
#

And, either way, you could tell that the integral is 0 by just looking at it since it's an odd function being integrated over a symmetric interval

lone heartBOT
#

@scenic wing Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fossil tide
#

what is the derivative of e^(1-x)

lone heartBOT
long axle
#

What’ve u trid#es

#

Tried

fossil tide
#

i thought it was itself because i thought d/dx(e^x) = e^x

#

solutions say its negative i dont undertsand how

long axle
#

Right, but then there’s chain rule

#

e^(1-x) * (1-x)’

#

e^(1-x) * -1

fossil tide
#

why do i have to use the chain rule here

long axle
#

-e^(1-x)

#

The exponent is a function

fossil tide
#

sorry i think im mostly confused on when the chain rule is used

long axle
#

$[e^{f(x)}]’ = e^{f(x)} \cdot f’(x)$

ocean sealBOT
#

Stephen

long axle
#

For example

#

$[e^x]’ = e^x \cdot [x]’ = e^x \cdot 1 = e^x$

fossil tide
#

oh

ocean sealBOT
#

Stephen

fossil tide
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fossil tide

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vast stump
#

<@&286206848099549185> hi, i dont understand anyth from this question

lone heartBOT
vast stump
#

<@&286206848099549185>

lone heartBOT
#

@vast stump Has your question been resolved?

dire tiger
#

See this solution for first part

vast stump
#

ahh

dire tiger
#

Is it clear

vast stump
#

yep

#

im abit confused abt the part b

#

part b of the question

scenic isle
lone heartBOT
#

@vast stump Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

signal shale
#

x = 122 ?

lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

a car travels a disctance of 52000 m is 15 minute whereas a train covers 65km in 45 minutes find the ratio of thier speeds

storm ridge
#

! occupied

lone heartBOT
#

Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

round iris
lone heartBOT
#

@signal shale Has your question been resolved?

runic hedge
signal shale
runic hedge
#

I see 3 & 4 at the bottom but can't read the rest

signal shale
#

that's just the sides

#

doesn't really matter

runic hedge
#

Ahh i see

#

What's the middle say?

signal shale
#

that's the total angle

#

here's a clear image I guess

naive sorrel
#

u know inscribed angle theorem?

signal shale
#

yh

#

some of them

naive sorrel
#

there's only one

signal shale
#

there's a ton

#

of them

naive sorrel
#

well there's only one theorem

signal shale
#

yeah

#

my bad

naive sorrel
#

so basically u know the circle arc measures add up to 360

signal shale
#

but what ive learned it only taught about triangles and 4 sides

#

yeah

naive sorrel
#

ok

#

do u know that an inscribed angle's degree measure is half the arc it inscribes

signal shale
#

I have no idea what are you talking about

charred jewel
naive sorrel
#

have u seen this b4

signal shale
#

yh

#

but this is a 4 side

#

6

naive sorrel
#

yeah it doesn't matter

signal shale
naive sorrel
#

an angle is an angle

charred jewel
#

just make a new line on the middle

signal shale
charred jewel
#

thats how i did it but idk if its right

#

might be making shit up

signal shale
#

i've never learnt anything about

#

dividing like that

charred jewel
#

yeah but dividing it like that gives you a quadrilateral in a circle

naive sorrel
#

yeah I got 128

#

I used different wY

#

way

#

so basically

#

the red arc is double the 127°

#

so it's 254°

#

and the blue arc is double the 105°

#

so it's 210°

#

but the circle can only add up to 360°

#

so the overlap

#

is

#

464-360

#

= 104

#

so

signal shale
#

how do you know the red arc is double the 127

naive sorrel
#

x° is 1/2(360° - overlap arc)

#

x° = 1/2(360°-104) = 128°

naive sorrel
charred jewel
#

drawing these lines sometimes help simplify the problem into something doable

signal shale
#

so there's more than 1 way to solve this huh

charred jewel
#

yeah

signal shale
#

can you show me how you also do it if you dont mind with your line dividing method shioshi

charred jewel
#

yeah

naive sorrel
#

inscribed angle

#

and central angle

signal shale
#

oh I see

#

what;s the

#

center x for tho

naive sorrel
#

that's the central angle

signal shale
#

127 x 2 right

naive sorrel
#

yea

signal shale
#

the center

naive sorrel
#

it is

#

and the arc is 127*2

signal shale
#

then what do I do after that

charred jewel
# naive sorrel

anyways so you have a 6 sided shape here inside the circle right, you draw a line through the middle two points

#

now you have two shapes with only 4 sides, and since those 4 sides all touch the circle, you know that opposite angles add to 180

#

then go from there

signal shale
#

do I divide

#

the 105 into 2 too ?

charred jewel
#

no

signal shale
#

what happens to it then

charred jewel
#

you know that if you have a shape with 4 sides, and all of them touches the circle, then opposite angles add to 180?

signal shale
#

yeah

#

corners

charred jewel
signal shale
#

you mean ?

charred jewel
#

yeah

#

now whats the blue angle

signal shale
#

its gotta be

#

180-127

charred jewel
#

you have 127 on the opposite side

#

yep

#

and since that whole angle is 105

#

you have the other side angle right?

signal shale
#

yh

#

105-53 = 52

charred jewel
#

now that angle is opposite to x

signal shale
#

180-52

charred jewel
#

you see that?

#

yes

signal shale
#

I see it now thanks

charred jewel
#

side question, where are you from cause i see the question is in malay

signal shale
#

malaysia

charred jewel
#

ayy same brother

#

which form are you

signal shale
#

3

charred jewel
#

i see

signal shale
#

what about you

charred jewel
#

oh i already graduated

#

first year uni

naive sorrel
# naive sorrel

red arc = (127*2)°
blue arc = (105*2)°

overlap between the arcs = (red  arc+blue arc) - (360°)
= 104°

x° = (1/2)(circle - (overlap arc))
x° = (1/2)(360° - (104°))
x° = 128°```
signal shale
#

oh damn

signal shale
signal shale
naive sorrel
#

because if you add them it includes the overlap

#

and then if you subtract the circle you get only the overlap

#

because the overlap is counted twice when u add the red and blue

#

so when u subtract the circle its only counted once and nothing else is counted

#

so u get the overlap degree measure

signal shale
#

what about the x calculation? I can't seem to be getting it especially about the 1/2

naive sorrel
#

because if u look at the picture

#

x is inscribing the arc of the whole circle - the overlap

#

so it's 1/2 the arc measure of (whole circle - the overlap)

signal shale
#

oh so theres another center for

#

the x we're looking for ?

#

that's why its 1/2 ?

naive sorrel
#

there's only one center of circle

#

maybe picture helps

signal shale
#

yhh I get the 1/2 thing

naive sorrel
#

so basically I just find the overlap between the red and blue arcs because x = 1/2 (circle - overlap)

signal shale
#

I see, thank you. Is this method useable in other questions with different amount of sides too?

naive sorrel
#

yes

#

side not mater

#

it's about the fact that the angle is inscribed in the circle

signal shale
#

alr thanks man I appreciate the assistance flonshed

#

this is one of the hardest topic this year for me

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @signal shale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

finite glen
#

how to say if x and y are independent

lone heartBOT
#

@finite glen Has your question been resolved?

finite glen
#

<@&286206848099549185>

lone heartBOT
#

@finite glen Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jagged crow
lone heartBOT
jagged crow
#

solving expoential equations with no logs

fickle tinsel
#

$16^{-3r} = 16*4$
From there notice any common powers?

ocean sealBOT
fickle tinsel
#

So simplify both sides in terms of base 4 and that'll solve for the exponent

fickle tinsel
#

$(4^2)^{-3r} = (4^2)*4$

ocean sealBOT
jagged crow
#

and then it's -3r = 4

#

what should i do

upbeat onyx
jagged crow
upbeat onyx
#

Which leaves you with what for an equation?

jagged crow
#

and then i think i should do -4/3 as the final answer

upbeat onyx
#

You're comparing a power to an integer here

jagged crow
#

o

#

should i radical it?

upbeat onyx
#

Let's think of it this way:

#

Do you know how to rewrite, let's say, (4^2)^2?

jagged crow
#

sure

upbeat onyx
#

What would it be

jagged crow
#

256

upbeat onyx
#

If we wanted to keep the power

#

4^(?)

jagged crow
#

4^4

upbeat onyx
#

Right. So you can do the same with the left side and multiply the exponents together

#

So (4^2)^(-3r) would become?

jagged crow
#

(4^-5)^r?

upbeat onyx
#

Well you multiply it

#

So 2×(-3r)

jagged crow
#

why did it turn into 2x

#

or 2

upbeat onyx
#

It's a multiply sign

jagged crow
#

i see

upbeat onyx
#

x vs ×

#

So on the left, you're left with 4^(-6r)

jagged crow
#

mhm i get it

upbeat onyx
#

And then on the right, you can combine that into one term too

jagged crow
#

16*4

#

or 256

upbeat onyx
#

If we wanted to keep the powers

jagged crow
#

64

upbeat onyx
#

64=4^(?)

jagged crow
#

4^3

upbeat onyx
#

Right

#

So now we have

#

$4^{-6r}=4^3$

ocean sealBOT
#

Narutoes

jagged crow
#

get rid of the fours

upbeat onyx
#

Well you said without logs, but in a normal situation, yeah

jagged crow
#

what do we do without logs

upbeat onyx
#

You can just set the exponents equal to each other since it is obvious they need to be equal since you have the same bases.

#

Basically the same as a log4 without calling it a log4

jagged crow
#

ok

#

thanks man

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jagged crow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lament pilot
#

can someone help me with this please (question b). I have repeatedly found that k = -3/2

lament pilot
#

this is my working:

lone heartBOT
#

@lament pilot Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

old sinew
#

I need to solve the polynomial $z^2+(2-i)z-2i$

slate jolt
#

you dont know how to solve quadratics?

old sinew
#

I used the quadratic equation

#

and i reached \frac

slate jolt
#

also z=0 is an obvious root here you dont need quad equation

#

you can factorize by z

#

right away

ocean sealBOT
old sinew
#

Sorry typo

slate jolt
#

ok

#

so yeah quad equation

old sinew
#

I reached $\frac{-(2-i) \pm \sqrt{3+4i}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
slate jolt
#

yeah ok

#

so what?

old sinew
#

how do i proceed from here?

slate jolt
#

why would you need to proceed?

old sinew
#

the solutions are -2 and i

#

it seems

slate jolt
#

,w z^2 +(2-i)z -2i

slate jolt
#

ok

#

maybe write 3+4i in exponential notation

#

so you can take the root

#

easily

#

im just double checkinh your calculations

old sinew
#

exponential notation isn't nice

#

like won't look nice

old sinew
#

I reached $\frac{-(2-i) \pm \sqrt{(2-i)^2 +8i}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
old sinew
#

I reached $\frac{-(2-i) \pm \sqrt{4-4i-1+8i}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
old sinew
#

I reached $\frac{-(2-i) \pm \sqrt{3+4i}{2}$

slate jolt
#

ok but i think exp notation is your only way out

old sinew
#

but my textbook writes it soo trivially

#

letme show

#

Example 3 section 1.5 proves qudratic formula for complex coefficents

slate jolt
#

maybe you need to find a a^2 +2ab + b^2

#

inside the root

old sinew
#

like inside root, it's of some square?

slate jolt
#

it probably is since it simplifies

#

,w 3+4i exponential notation

ocean sealBOT
slate jolt
#

,w 3+4i

slate jolt
#

ok it suckd

old sinew
#

let me show the problem 21 they talking about

#

it's sort of mental trick it seems

#

3+4i= (a+ib)^2 they saying

slate jolt
#

yeah it is true

#

any complex number is the square of some other complex number

old sinew
#

can you explain the stratergy ?

#

i don't think i get it

slate jolt
#

(a+ib)^2 = (a^2-b^2) + 2ab i

old sinew
#

yes

slate jolt
#

so if you have c+id

#

and want to find the sqrt

#

you want (a+ib)^2 = (a^2-b^2) + 2ab i = c+i d

#

so identify imaginary and real parts

old sinew
#

so we look for two numbers a,b such that a^2-b^2 =c , 2ab=d?

slate jolt
#

yes

old sinew
#

make sense

#

so for 3+4i

#

a=2, b=1 works

#

thus 2+i is a root

#

the other root is -(2+i)

slate jolt
#

uh no

#

this gives you a simplification

#

of the sqrt

#

in your formula

old sinew
#

yes, but If I'm just looking for the root of 3+4i

#

isn't it 2+i and -2-i ?

#

since (2+i)^2 = 3+4i, clearly 2+i is a root of 3+4i right?

slate jolt
#

oh yeah the dqrt

#

sqrt

#

root= solution of a polynomial in my mind

old sinew
#

I reached $\frac{-(2-i) \pm \sqrt{3+4i}}{2}$ = $\frac{-(2-i) \pm (2+i)}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
old sinew
#

got it

#

z=-2 or i

lone heartBOT
#

@old sinew Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wary marsh
#

This graph is a periodic graph for y = x in Fourier series

#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

wary marsh
#

I wanna oh

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

torn spade
lone heartBOT
torn spade
#

6 questions to ask but same topic

tall topaz
#

compute g(2) first

#

then do f(whatever g(2) is)

torn spade
#

uhhh idk

#

idk how to

tall topaz
#

for g(2) put 2 into the x in the expression for g(x)

#

,, g(2) = 2 \cdot 2^3 +1

ocean sealBOT
torn spade
#

so g(2) = 17?

tall topaz
#

yes

torn spade
#

since x is 2

#

but im not sure what is the answer of f(g(2))

tall topaz
#

since g(2) = 17

#

you need to compete

#

compute f(17)

torn spade
#

i got 49

tall topaz
#

,, f(17) = 3\cdot \textcolor{red}{17} - 2

#

yes

ocean sealBOT
torn spade
#

17 times 3 is 51 then minus 2 is 7 squared

tall topaz
#

yes

torn spade
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @torn spade

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

help

lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

help me

slate jolt
#

how do you find the turning point of a quadratic?

alpine sable
#

formula like -b/2a and Vertex y = b²-4ac/2a

#

bythe way what is the question about

#

I didint understand

#

who can help

#

me

slate jolt
#

start by finding the turning point

#

and then find a k

#

such that the turning point is on the y axis

#

meaning that its x cordinate is =0

#

and same for Q5 but the y cordinate= 0

junior vigil
#

@alpine sable

alpine sable
#

ok thanks

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vivid roost
lone heartBOT
#

@vivid roost Has your question been resolved?

vivid roost
#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

Hey!

vivid roost
#

hi 🙂

alpine sable
#

What math are you taking

vivid roost
#

this is stats and probability

alpine sable
#

Alr

#

Lemme see if I can get a helper on you

vivid roost
#

okay thanks so much

alpine sable
#

We are very low on helpers rn

#

XD

vivid roost
#

ahhh

lone heartBOT
#

@vivid roost Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@vivid roost Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@vivid roost Has your question been resolved?

brisk quartz
#

To find the expected value for the number of years of experience from the employees of this department, we will use the joint probability distribution given by $ f(x_i, y_j) $. The expected value of Y is computed as:

#

,tex $ E[Y] = \sum y_j f(x_i, y_j) $

ocean sealBOT
#

kurenai_5h

lone heartBOT
#

@vivid roost Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @vivid roost

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

summer hemlock
lone heartBOT
summer hemlock
#

I need help with number 4

#

My teacher wants me to find 5 x's that would fit on that graph to graph the function

pulsar spire
#

seems like you got 4 dots so far

#

do one more x value

summer hemlock
#

idk how to make the graph a triangle though

pulsar spire
#

triangle? wym

summer hemlock
#

in a triangle shape

#

I mean v shape

pulsar spire
#

what would x = -3 give you

#

input that into your function

summer hemlock
#

-5

pulsar spire
#

2 - 3

#

isnt -5

summer hemlock
#

oh shoot I forgot to make it positive then subtract

#

-1

pulsar spire
#

do -4 after that, and you should get your v

summer hemlock
#

alright

#

ok thanks I get it now

#

I appreicate the help

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @summer hemlock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

how can i make this into a form that can utilize PFD

naive valley
#

factor the denominator?

foggy pecan
alpine sable
foggy pecan
#

$\frac{1}{s^{2}-4}=\frac{1}{\left( s-2 \right)\left( s+2 \right)}=\frac{1}{4}\left( \frac{1}{s-2} -\frac{1}{s+2}\right)\text{ then }\\\mathbb{L^{-1}}\left{F\left( s \right) \right}=\frac{1}{4}\left( e^{2t}-e^{-2t} \right)=\frac{1}{2}\sinh\left( 2t \right)$

ocean sealBOT
#

Joanna Angel

foggy pecan
#

first you introduce the image F(s) as a sum of partial fractions

#

and next you get the Lapalce'a tables

#

adn you read it from there

#

finally i noticed it can be exprfesed as hyperbolic sine

#

but it is makeup haha )

#

so optional thing

alpine sable
#

damn i had no idea that it factors to (s-2)(s+2) oof

#

im silly

#

thanks

hushed locust
#

that's a difference of squares

alpine sable
#

yeah i just thought imaginary for some reason

#

no clue why

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @crude ginkgo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

slow haven
lone heartBOT
slow haven
#

Hi, how can I begin to show if something like this converges?

#

I only know a few tests such as: finding the limit directly, ratio test (growth factor test), and the comparison test

#

oh and the sandwich theorem

#

but that isn't a test per say..

#

So, I am not sure how to show if this converges or not, although im almost certain it diverges?

foggy pecan
#

this sequence is divergent, since its limit does not exist, becasue there are two subsequences convvergent to different limits

slow haven
#

OH I FORGOT ABOUT THAT ONE

#

thank you very much mate

foggy pecan
#

🙂

slow haven
#

i am just wondering which two subsequences to take

foggy pecan
#

think ab sin

#

am sure you know when sin = 0

#

and

#

sin = 1

#

or sin = -1

#

hence think , how to write n =

#

$sinx=0\Leftrightarrow x=k\pi$

ocean sealBOT
#

Joanna Angel

slow haven
#

okay that one makes sense

#

but im not sure how to pick another subsequence that doesn't just oscillate like the original one to be honest

foggy pecan
#

just think about what n must be inside the sine for it to just stay there kPi

#

then

#

n = 12k

slow haven
#

Yes

foggy pecan
#

ok

#

and now

#

$sinx=1\Leftrightarrow x=\frac{\pi}{2}+2k\pi$

slow haven
#

the subsequence converges to zero

ocean sealBOT
#

Joanna Angel

foggy pecan
#

n= 6 + 24k, i think

slow haven
#

Ah.

#

and that converges to one

foggy pecan
#

🙂

slow haven
#

i just forgot about the periodicness!

#

thank you @foggy pecan very much!

foggy pecan
#

yes )

#

yvw )

slow haven
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @slow haven

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

craggy briar
#

How do I do this problem?

lone heartBOT
foggy pecan
#

you need to use double integral

#

nd using iterated integrals

#

$\left| V \right|=\int_{0}^{2}dx\int_{2x}^{4}\left( x^{2}y+y^{2} \right)dy=...$

ocean sealBOT
#

Joanna Angel

foggy pecan
#

it is very easy to calculate

craggy briar
#

oh gotcha

#

thank you

foggy pecan
#

yw 🙂

ionic jewel
#

I hate that the dx is there

lone heartBOT
#

@craggy briar Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@craggy briar Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gilded galleon
#

Flip 10 coins. What is the probability that there are an equal number of heads and tails or the first three flips are heads (or both)?
So the probability of equal number of heads is 252/2^10 which is C(10, 5) over total combinations of 10 coins flips
probability of first three flips being head is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/8
so to get the probability i want i would subtract from 252 the values that are already considered by the 1/8 or the values that have first three head and equal number of heads and tails? so that would by C(7, 2) = 21. so the probability is either event is (252 - 21)/2^10 + 1/8????

lone heartBOT
#

@gilded galleon Has your question been resolved?

gilded galleon
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

lone heartBOT
#

@gilded galleon Has your question been resolved?

plucky sluice
lone heartBOT
#

@gilded galleon Has your question been resolved?

gilded galleon
#

/close

#

!close

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @gilded galleon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

plucky sluice
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

knotty thunder
#

How do I formally prove the 1st statement to be true.
I proved the 2nd statement to be false by counter example. It's when f(x) = x ** 2 and A = {1} and B = {-1}.

knotty thunder
#

I tested empirically through python. It seems that the 1st statement might be True, but how do I formally prove it to be True

lone heartBOT
#

@knotty thunder Has your question been resolved?

tribal haven
#

pretty sure 1 is not true unless i'm misreading something big

knotty thunder
#
# not one to one
def f(x):
    return x**2

# one to one
def g(x):
    return x + 1

A = {-2, -3, -5, 3, 4, 5, 6}
B = {-5, 2, 3, 4, 0, 1}

# {f(x):x∈A}△{f(x):x∈B} is a subset of {f(x):x∈A△B}
# {f(x):x∈A△B} is a subset of {f(x):x∈A}△{f(x):x∈B}

# not one to one
f_expression1 = {f(x) for x in A} ^ {f(x) for x in B}
f_expression2 = {f(x) for x in (A ^ B)}

# one to one
g_expression1 = {g(x) for x in A} ^ {g(x) for x in B}
g_expression2 = {g(x) for x in (A ^ B)}

print(f_expression1.issubset(f_expression2), g_expression1.issubset(g_expression2))
print(f_expression2.issubset(f_expression1), g_expression2.issubset(g_expression1))
#

this is my python code on trying to find counter examples of the problem

tribal haven
#

ok i might be mistreading something big lmao

#

oh jesus christ ok yes i did

the proof is like 2 lines

#

i read equality instead of subset -_-

#

just argue from the definition of subset and use properties of symmetric difference

knotty thunder
#

iknow the definition of a subset and symdi

#

but idk where to start

tribal haven
#

by definition of subset if A is a subset of B then every x in A is in B

so show that if x is the set on the left then it's in the set on the right, properties of symdiff will help

#

i guess contrapositive might be easier

knotty thunder
#

hmm im still lost. wut properties of symdiff r u using. i only know the propert a ^b = (a-b) u (b-a)

tribal haven
#

specifically $x \in A \triangle B \Rightarrow x \notin A \cap B$

ocean sealBOT
tribal haven
#

you might even be able to exhaustively prove this

since either x in A or not in A and similarly x in B or not in B
you can brute force all 4 cases for all x for both sides thinkies

knotty thunder
#

sdjkahjkdashjk my brain broke down 😭

#

hmm wait

#

how about for when we input something lets say that is from A and B.
is f(A and B) ^ f( A and B ) going to be the subset of {f(x):x∈A△B}

tribal haven
#

your left hand set is empty, so yes

knotty thunder
#

oh yea

#

hmm

#

so the statement is equivalent when is both true when the function is one to one

#

but if the f is not one to one

#

the 2nd statement is gonna go false

#

?

#

this is wut i get from trying to draw the sets and function on paper

#

idk how to formally write any proof

tribal haven
#

bijective function gives you equality
but if not bijective then it's a subset of

knotty thunder
#

oh yeah thats wut i found also

#

wait bijective is one to one right

tribal haven
#

the start of the logic begins with:

if $x \in LHS$ then either $ x \in A$ or $x \in B$. Without loss of generality assume $x \in A$ (or otherwise swap A and B's), then $\nexists y \in B: f(y) = f(x)$ (why?)

ocean sealBOT
knotty thunder
#

wait wut

#

but theres a case where y like that exists

#

if the function is not bijective

#

It's when f(x) = x ** 2 and A = {1} and B = {-1}.

#

i dont get it

#

wut u tryna say

#

sorry

#

can u explain a bit more

tribal haven
#

that requires some amount of thought instead of straight up copying down properties

lone heartBOT
#

@knotty thunder Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @knotty thunder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

whole scaffold
lone heartBOT
whole scaffold
#

I need to help with this question. I need to find the reading of the voltmeter and the ammeter right after the switch is closed and after a long time, but I'm not really sure what to do with she solenoid and the capacitor

#

can anyone give me hints with what to do with those two?

alpine sable
whole scaffold
#

yes

alpine sable
#

What's mH ?

#

Unit of inductance is what google says

whole scaffold
#

just Henry? in 10^-3

#

?

#

yeah

#

from what i assume, at the estart i can just assume this as one single series circuit?

#

because the loop witht he inductor will not flow any current, and the one with v4 will also not flow, because the one with the capacitor provides almost no resistance

#

so it'll just be strictly flowing through in one single loop right after switch is turned on?

#

so v2 = v3 = v4 = 0

#

am i right so far?

#

so V1 is just 40V, cuz that's the only resistor in the circuit

#

but what is V5, is it also 0, or is it at 40

#

cuz isn't the voltage through a capacitor like, 0 immediately after the switch is turned on?

#

so V2 ~ V5 = 0 immeidately after, and V1 = 40

night wren
#

how the bound differs from the constraint function? And how does it affect the solution

whole scaffold
#

hey not to be that guy but i'm using this channel btw

lone heartBOT
whole scaffold
#

And then after a long time, the loop with capacitor is dead, the inductor just acts as a wire, so now its a parallel circuit?

#

so overall resistance is 50 + 100/3, so the current is I = 40/(250/3) = 0.48A

#

so V2 = V5 = 0

#

V1 = IR = 0.48(50) = 24V

#

and the voltage across both V3 and V4 is equal cuz they are in parallel, so its just 16V?

#

<@&286206848099549185> anyone?

#

so to summarize for what i got
Right after switch is closed
V1: 40
V2 = V3 = V4 = V5 = 0

After long time
V1 = 24
V2 = V5 = 0
V3 = V4 = 16

#

So in terms of current, at the start, there's none through A2 and A3 so that's 0

#

A1 and A4 is equal cuz its current in a series circuit, so its just 40/50 = 0.8A

#

And then after long time, A4 is 0 cuz capacitor is fully charged

whole scaffold
#

and because the resistors are 2:1, A2 = 0.16A and A3 = 0.32A

#

Did i do this correctly? anyone?

golden gulch
#

or frequency (f) given?

whole scaffold
#

???

golden gulch
#

Basically what happens is that when the switch is closed immediately, the current through inductor(solenoid) will be zero, as the nature of the inductor is to oppose the current, so, v2=v3=0 when switch is immediately closed.
Capacitor will start charging and hence current will flow in capacitor

after a long time at t=infinity, no current will flow in capacitor and current will flow in the branch having the solenoid. SO, V5=0 when t=infinity.

now after eliminating the elements according to the condition, we can find the ratio of impedences and hence current in each branch, for that we need frequency in order to find the impedence of the elements like capacitor and inductors,,.....

#

in order to find the Xl and Xc( impedences of inductor and capacitor respectively), we need frequency as
Xl=wl and Xc=1/wc where , w=2pif

whole scaffold
#

i feel like you are way overcomplicating this for my class

golden gulch
whole scaffold
#

hmm

#

alright

#

also another question

#

if a current is decreasing at a constant rate, and that rate is di/dt = -0.018A/s

#

do i treat that as negative or positive

#

like, its decreasing, but the rate is negative?

golden gulch
#

I guess u are talking about the inductor, the negative sign just denotes that the current is decreasing, so you will use negative sign while solving the equations.

whole scaffold
#

aight ty, gn 🙏

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @whole scaffold

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

whole scaffold
lone heartBOT
whole scaffold
#

I was doing this question earlier and I got three parts wrong, and I'm not sure where I got it wrong, so can someone check for me?

#

I had to find the values of the voltmeter and the ammeter right after the switch is turned on, and after the long time

#

here's my answers
Voltmeter at the start
V1 = 40V
V2 = V3 = V4 = V5 = 0V

After long time
V1 = 24V
V2 = V5 = 0V
V3 = V4 = 16V

Ammeter at the start
A1 = A3 = 0.8A
A2 = A4 = 0A

After long time
A1 = 0.48A
A2 = 0.16A
A3 = 0.32A
A4 = 0A

whole scaffold
#

🙏

whole scaffold
#

The only other thing that i think could be wrong is V5 = 0

stuck cape
#

It seems to be question of physics cutethink

whole scaffold
#

cuz i thought it could be 40V, but i thought at the start, voltage through capacitance was 0

#

yeahhh, but i was told i can ask physics questions cuz physica is technically math :3

#

nvm

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @whole scaffold

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

please can anyonje help me?

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

alpine sable
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @unborn abyss

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow trench
#

4(x+1) + |x+4| < 2(2x+3)

lone heartBOT
hollow trench
#

Hello. Can someone help me with something?

#

I have this inequality and the exercise requests me to verify if 0 is a solution of the inequality

#

but I don't really understand

pallid scarab
#

replace x by 0, check if the statement you get is true

hollow trench
#

so 4(0+1) + |x+4| < 2(2 * 0 + 3)

#

4 + 4 < 0 + 6

#

8 < 6

#

nonoo

#

4 + | 0 + 4 | < 6

#

| 0 + 4 | < 2

#

-2 < 4 < 2

#

it doesn't maky any sense

#

am I wrong somewhere?

pallid scarab
#

no, you're not wrong

#

Remember, i asked you to check IF the statement is true

#

as the same as the question

#

so is the statement true or false?

hollow trench
#

so 0 can't be a solution because the " -2 < 4 < 2 " is false

#

so the whole statement is false

pallid scarab
hollow trench
#

if I have absolute value don't I need to use the opposite of the number in the right in the left of the inequality?

lament forge
#

...that might be the correct thing to do in some circumstances but it's not something that a law of the universe requires you to do any time an absolute value exists anywhere

#

it is true that if x=0, then 4(x+1) + |x+4| = 8 and 2(2x+3) = 6, and so the statement 4(x+1) + |x+4| < 2(2x+3) is equivalent to the statement 8 < 6

hollow trench
#

soo... How can a stupid like me find if I need to use that "law"

#

Overall, the statement is false, at least I understood that

lament forge
#

...well it's just also true that |x| < y is the same as -y < x < y

#

so if you're trying to work out which x satisfy |x| < 4, turning that into "-4 < x < 4" is probably useful

#

if you want to know if |4| < 6, you can turn that into "-6 < 4 < 6" because it's still true that those are the same, but just computing that |4| = 4 so the statement is 4 < 6 is also valid

#

in general there isn't really ever only one way to solve something, any sequence of valid inferences will get you a correct answer

hollow trench
#

Thank you for the explanation and for your time! I really appreciate. I was a bit confused.

#

we can call this an "ugly" math problem, ig...

lament forge
#

...?
i don't see what's "ugly" about it

hollow trench
#

I usually call a problem "ugly" when I can't do it by myself, hehe, I am a strange person. However, even with the inegality resolved wrong, I still got the same answer.

lament forge
#

idk what you mean by "resolved wrong"

#

you did it two different ways and both of them were correct

hollow trench
#

oh, I thought that without using this law isn't as correct as it is using it

#

Anyway. Thank you very much for your time! Have a great day!

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hollow trench

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

novel widget
#

hello, i saw a correction of an exam and at some point they give this equation
e^(1/α -1) = -α/(α - 1 )
α range is between 0.21 and 0.22 that make both left and right sides positive but how did they went from left side to the right side

vale crag
#

e^x is approximately 1+x, that's prolly what they did

#

is it $e^{\frac{1}{a-1}}$ or $e^{\frac1a -1}$ ?

ocean sealBOT
#

aPlatypus

vale crag
#

@novel widget

novel widget
#

1 / (α -1)

vale crag
#

$e^{\frac{1}{a-1}} \approx 1 + \frac{1}{a-1} = \frac{a}{a-1}$

ocean sealBOT
#

aPlatypus

vale crag
#

I don't really see how they got their minus then

novel widget
vale crag
#

yeah so they typo'd

#

a/(a-1) should be a correct approximation then

novel widget
#

this is really missed up ngl

vale crag
#

well it's not the first nor the last typo we'll ever do

novel widget
#

how can i close thi

#

s

vale crag
#

.close

#

type it yourself you'll see

novel widget
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @novel widget

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thin sedge
#

A

lone heartBOT
thin sedge
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
thin sedge
storm ridge
thin sedge
#

Numerator, when he multiples xy why is it not xy^3+y^2

#

I know what it should be but I don’t understand why

storm ridge
#

Ok so

#

What does x^-1 mean

thin sedge
#

negative exponent or 1/x

storm ridge
#

1/x

#

x^-1 = 1/x^1

thin sedge
#

Mhm

storm ridge
#

And now if you multiply x

#

x/x=?

#

Another way to look at it would be that
x^-1 * x^1 = x^(-1+1) (why?)

thin sedge
#

Ohh

#

wait I’m writing ur stuff

#

okay

#

I get it

#

Thx

storm ridge
#

Np

thin sedge
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @thin sedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

exotic canopy
#

i am investigating behaviour of nested functions of cosine

exotic canopy
#

i know that dottie number is what $$\cos^{(\infty)}(x)$$ stabilizes to (where $f^{(n)} = \underbrace{f(f(\cdots(}_{n \text{ times}}x)$) )

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

exotic canopy
#

this is equivalent to what the sequence $a_n = \cos(a_{n-1})$ converges to

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

exotic canopy
#

but

#

let's analyze $\cos^{(\infty)}(bx)$

#

$x$ is the variable, $b \in \bR$ is a parameter

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

#

artemetra

exotic canopy
#

dottie number is the case b=1

exotic canopy
#

how/where can i study this weird behaviour?

#

ofc what i have here is an approximation because i have the function nested finitely many times

#

(although 70 times is a pretty good approximation)

#

the x/b argument is to keep the period of the function the same

lone heartBOT
#

@exotic canopy Has your question been resolved?

mellow grail
#

Study as in? Its properties?

#

Well a good start is its fixed points

#

And to test if they r there u can use that banach point theorem

mellow grail
#

Also if u know how to (me also researching this topic so don't ask me how( u can design a differential equation if there exists one

#

@exotic canopy

exotic canopy
#

it's just really difficult cuz these numbers are all transcendental

#

hm

#

,w taylor expansion of cos(cos(x))

exotic canopy
#

bruh

mellow grail
#

Eh Taylor might be stupid. Wait no it is stupid

#

I suppose Fourier series would be...shittier

#

Hmm perhaps a slope field? It would be the slope field of y' = cos(by)

#

Because aPlaytpus and my research have told me that a_n = f(a_(n-1)) and, y' = f(y) are similar

#

So if u study one, the other will have similar properties

mellow grail
#

I think the graph can help with that

mellow grail
# exotic canopy wdym?

Well when b=1 we know the sequence converges to a single value, no matter what a_0 (ie first value) u take. Does ur modified sequence show that too?

#

The word is constriction, I think

mellow grail
# exotic canopy wdym?

I just realised this is equivalent to checking for banach fixed point theorems validity on ur modified sequence

mellow grail
exotic canopy
#

the last one

mellow grail
#

I see

exotic canopy
#

it's periodic

#

it doesn't converge to one value

#

but it converges to one interval

mellow grail
#

This weird expression of taking cos over and over again is just a sequence x_n=cos(x_{n-1}). There is a very cool theorem called the Banach Fixed Point Theorem that let's figure out the limit of sequences like this and depends on cos(x) being a so called contractible mapping.

Check out my MATH MERCH line in collaboration with Beautiful Equatio...

▶ Play video
#

This very briefly covers the banach fixed pt theorem

#

And studies ur sequence for b=1

exotic canopy
#

yeah i know it's properties for b=1

exotic canopy
mellow grail
mellow grail
exotic canopy
#

this kinda reminds me of logistic map for some reason

mellow grail
#

Isn't that for like exponentials

#

And that reminds me u can even use the imaginary definition of cosine here, see if it gives something interesting

mellow grail
exotic canopy
#

wait

#

$\cos(\theta) = \frac{e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

exotic canopy
#

so

#

$\cos(\cos(\theta)) = \frac{e^{i\cos(\theta)}+e^{-i\cos(\theta)}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

exotic canopy
#

$\cos(\cos(\theta)) = \frac{e^{i(\frac{e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}}{2})}+e^{-i(\frac{e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}}{2})}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

exotic canopy
#

anyways

#

i think i'll come back once i have a proper question

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @exotic canopy

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

meager temple
#

I need help solving this question. I got no clue how to solve it

meager temple
#

i dont know how i can decide on the third length of a triangle

snow cobalt
#

Triangle inequality

#

Sum of 2 sides has to be greater than the third

#

Can't be equal

meager temple
#

so the third side should be less than 6+4?

north perch
#

yeah

meager temple
#

so itll be 10>BC

#

but then wont it mean that all the options can be BC

north perch
#

the difference of 2 sides is lesser then third side

#

there's also this property

meager temple
#

🤨

#

i do not understand

#

do i make the inequality 6+4>BC or 6-4>BC

north perch
#

sorry mb

#

6-4<BC

meager temple
#

that means it cannot be 2 yes?

north perch
#

yep

meager temple
#

and this is called triangle inequality?

#

difference of two sides must be less than the third side?

north perch
#

yes

meager temple
#

lemme check if its correct on the answer sheet rq

#

alright nice

#

thank you grey

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @meager temple

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

idle willow
#

if i have

4h/9/h

can I eliminate the h?

lone heartBOT
exotic canopy
#

yes

idle willow
#

but

#

directly?

exotic canopy
#

$\frac{4h}{\frac{9}{h}}$?

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

idle willow
#

no

exotic canopy
#

this?

idle willow
#

4h/9/h/1 i think

exotic canopy
#

what

#

write it down and send

idle willow
#

ok

exotic canopy
#

ah

#

still cancels out

idle willow
#

if i want to change them to multiply
4/h * h/1 is that possible right?

idle willow
exotic canopy
idle willow
#

okay okay

exotic canopy
#

$\frac{4h}{h}$

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

idle willow
#

thanks ❤️

idle willow
#

there is something that mathematician do

#

is pass double fraction to multiply one fraction with the other one

#

i dont know how is that named

exotic canopy
#

you mean like $\frac{a}{b} \div \frac{c}{d} = \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{d}{c}$?

idle willow
#

no i mean

charred summit
# idle willow

You can think about it as
$$(4h \over 5) \over h$$
$$\frac{4h}{5}\over h$$
$$\frac{4h}{5}\times \frac1{h}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

artemetra

exotic canopy
idle willow
#

this

#

i know

#

i am stupid but i have examen monday haha

#

and im studying basics

exotic canopy
#

yes

#

that's correct

idle willow
#

because basics are important

#

okay thanks artemetra

exotic canopy
#

no problem

idle willow
#

hahaha

#

well thank and happy december first

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @idle willow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

idle willow
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

idle willow
#

@exotic canopy i can't to cancel the h because upside h is substractin

#

right?

deep condor
#

I mean

#

You could just write it as (1/h)-1

idle willow
deep condor
#

Not really possible here, you're going to have at least one h remaining

idle willow
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @idle willow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

can someone explain this?

devout helm
# alpine sable

if you expand it entirely there will be some zeroes after 7 like 14670000000000000..

alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

what is ?

#

99?

#

yeah

#

so

#

how many zeros

#

OHHH

#

99 ZEROS?

#

yes

#

bro my dumbass thought i had to write down 99 zeros

#

in the qn

#

thank you so much'!

#

is this correct

#

and how do we simplify fully btww

alpine sable
#

one big question

#

did you write [
\s[3]{\f62} \tss{or} \f{\s[3]6}2
]

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

???

#

what the fuck?

#

okay but you get the idea, which one of those did u write?

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

what u wrote doesnt really show it well

#

you have to be clear

#

they are very different

alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

is this correct?

#

i rewrote

#

it

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

what u wrote

#

but anyways

#

like

alpine sable
#

[
\p{abc}^n = a^n\cd b^n\cd c^n
]