#help-0
1 messages · Page 341 of 1
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
ok so
i went from
7√45 - 2√80 right
7√9 √5 - 2√16 √5
and then i did this thing where you simplify 16 into 4√5
so now we have 7√9 √5 - 2 times 4√5
which basically equals
7√9√5 - 8√5
wait
so then
7 times 3√5 - 8√5
equals 21 - 8√5
which technically equals uhh
13√5
wait so did i do it wrong
probably
Use a calculator to check
Closed by @keen fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
thats your difference quotient formula
ill tell you your final answer 8x is correct but you didnt setup the limit correctly
Closed by @serene marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i start off this indentity? (prove the identity is real)
tanx + cotx = 2csc2x
turn everything into sin and cos
my teacher insists that i chose one side and stick to it throughout the equation, Should i start off with double angle identity on the right?
a neat trick is that you can go down one side and up the other
but yeah sure double angle seems like a good idea
would i convert that to 1/sin2x and then expand out with it in the denominator? or should i times both sides then factor it out
should i times both sides
i thought you weren't allowed to do that
would i convert that to 1/sin2x
yes that seems like a good idea unless you have an identity for csc2x memorized lol
no im not alowed to, also okay ill try that.
figured it out, thanks!
.close
Closed by @vague briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with another related rates problem?
Differentiate both sides with respect to time
You need to raise the 8+x^3 to the -1/2 power
But other than that it looks good
You want to find how fast x is changing, so solve for dx/dt
Closed by @echo goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm working on this, but not getting very far.
So, what I've gathered is that each face has atleast 3 edges
the total degree of the faces is 2 times the edges
and
Austin
also eulers formula applies because it is a 3D convex polyhedra
so v-e+f=2
so I have all of these tools at my disposal
but really not seeing anything to do with them
I want to create some sort of contradiction I'd assume. Suppose P does not have a triangular face or a vertex of degree 3, then........
but I don't see at all what this tells me about any of the stuff I know has to be true for my polyhedra
any ideas or comments?
@rose sigil
@bright hedge
Have you found an example where it has a triangular face and no vertex of degreeb3
I have not, I don't really know how to draw 3D convex polyhedra at all
so
there's also that
Tbh I don’t think you can
so how could I find an example?
Because if Hou have a triangular face and it’s 3D one of the edges need to be connected to some other face
Which gives you a third degree
Which is weird
if you have a triangular face
it is degree 3
one of the edges does need to be connected to some other face yes
what do you mean after that though?
Chad there is also this
Like if this were true why does it mention triangular face
if there are no triangular faces
then all of the faces have degree >= 4
so this becomes
$2e=\sum_{F}d(F)\geq 4F$
Austin
if there are no triangular faces
could we work with that to show there is a vertex of degree 3?
Pigeonhole almost solves this from here
yeah that would be better
that is a better method
not pigeonhole, idk what you mean yet
but
Suppose there is no triangular face show this implies a vertex of degree 3
and additionally proving
suppoose there is no vertex of degree 3 show this implies a triangular face
instead of contradicting both at once
This is false
that is nicer aprroach
Cuz we showed it would have to have a vertex of degree 3 to be 3D
Start with the triangular face. If none of the vertexes had degree 3, they all have degree 2. But then we just have the triangular face which is not 3D
that seems like too trivial, why would the part about a vertex of degree 3 be included then?
That’s what I’m saying it’s weird
and why does it say "Or"
yeah it does man
My b
okay so
Suppose there is no triangular face show this implies a vertex of degree 3
and additionally proving
suppose there is no vertex's of degree 3 show this implies a triangular face
this is our approach
seems decent enough right?
Yeah
okay that's better
and if there is no triangular face
so working on the first statement
then we have this
and we have to think about if this would be useful to imply there is a vertex of exactly degree 3
Can we find an example where the polyhedra has no vertexes of degree 3
Be better idk
Yeah
so an example
the thing we are trying to prove seems likely it is true
rejoice
but no progress
What goes wrong if it has all square faces
Suppose they’d I didn’t
..
then our cube is not a cube
and is just like empty strings floating attached to eachother in my mind
V - E + F = 2
E is multiple of 4 too
Yes dumbass all the faces are squares
Ik we dealing with this first
ok cube
Anyways this says the # of vertices is 2 mod 4 but it should be a multiple of 4 a contradiction VM
4(C-E)+V=2
lamo
@lone heart ban him please
@ocean seal
@vapid shuttle
@fierce herald
bruhhh
I went to office hours for this one and he gave me a hint
but it isn't helping
What was it
it was basically the stuff I told you
eulers formula should apply
and
2e= total degree of all the faces >=3f
basically the sketch was
since 3d convex polyhedra -> planar -> eulers formula -> contradictons
that is what Ricky said
and he did as an example proving that K5 is not planar
Because V - E + F is not 2?
Ah
Do you have an equivalent classification for triangular face
Other than face of degree 3
no
I think the triangular faces come in pairs
idk if that is true or not
idk how to prove if that is true or not
idk if that helps us if it is true or not
@fallen verge
bink
bonk
I got hints in office hours
tis fine i will power through
maybe they will help you
v-e+f=2
so basically what I got was
yes eulers formula
but also
2e=(total degree of faces) >= 3f
no
I don't think that is a good appraoch
a better one would be
suppose there is no triangular face
show this implies a vertex of degree 3
and then prove the opposite statement yknow
its time to
instead of trying to contradict both
what are duals?
also Garlic
another potentially good hint for you
this
duals are sort of the inverted polyhedron
which I couldn't quite follow
hold on lemme think
I also recieved a hint for #4 if you wanted to talk about that one
couldnt think of anything quick, checking the mathoverflow problem
actually just consider one vertex
consider any one vertex of our 3D convex polyhedra
if it cannot have triangles and has to have at least 4 shapes, what must be around the vertex?
something larger than a triangle?
yes
at least 4 edges
oh wait they need not be regular
our formula becomes
my dumbass
2e=(total degree of faces)>=4f
if theyre regular, its a lot easier
are you allowed to use the fact that K_5 is not planar?
OHOHOOHOOHO
IWNDIWNIDNWDow
Garlic
we proved that as an example
as a hint
so
yes
I imagine you are onto somethin
because he showed us that as an example hint for this question
Garlic
I do already have the eulers formula applies for convex 3D polyhedra
btw
if that is what you are looking for
yes i know
okay just making sure
I'm gonna be reading my textbook to see if there is any helpful examples
tag me if u think of something pls
alright
@vapid shuttle Has your question been resolved?
so remember how i wanted to prove that a K5 must exist in the graph somewhere?
so we look at a vertex in the graph
sure
we know that there must be at least 4 polygons connected to it
that creates a graph with 8 out of the 10 edges
after simplification
sure
@fallen verge okay I am ready when you are
so we look at a vertex in the graph
this vertex has at least 4 edges connected to it
if it does not have 3 edges connected to it
indeed this is true
when you say, "with 8 out of the 10 edges" what do you mean?
don't we only have 4 edges from our vertex? not 8? and the 10 edges of what?
I think I have a solution if you are interested
Yes please!
Suppose every face has $>3$ edges. Then, $4f\leq 2e$ (at least $4$ edges per face, but $2$ faces per edge), so $2f<e$. If every vertex has $>3$ incident edges, then $2e\geq4v$, or $e\geq 2v$ (similar double counting argument).
By Euler's formula,
\begin{align*}
v-e+f&=2\
2v-2e+2f&=4\
2v-2e+e&\geq4\
2v-e&\geq4
\end{align*}
so $e\leq 2v-4$, violating the bound on the second inequality with vertex/edges.
also what are incident edges?
edges that touch the vertex
ah ok
an edge (a,b) is said to be incident to vertices a and b
I've never actually worked with them in a coordinate system
Desync
ah thats better than my idea
formally, edges are ordered pairs (or tuples for hypergraphs) of vertices
formally ordered?
but anyways
ah
okay so
if every face has >3 edges
then 2e=sum of all the degrees of the faces
2e>=4f
yes
I had gotten this far earlier
okay and then
2f<e
that should be nonstrict
I'm used to typing with macros but they don't activate on discord 😭
okay so 2e>4f
why?
every edge has atleast 4 faces
but what if they all just have 4
is that not allowed someway
oh nonstrict
the other one
I see sorry
yeah
inequalities 
in terms of graphs it's basically this theorem
my proof is just probably scuffed
suppose every face has >3 edges (so no triangular faces) then this impies 2f<=e yes. if every vertex has strictly greater than 3 edges, (so no vertex with 3 edges) then 2e>=4v or e>=2v
I understand up until here
so substitute 2f<=e into euler's formula
and we get e<=2v-4
which can't hold at the same time as e>=2v
so contradiction
yet eulers formula should hold
for convex 3D polyhedra
so it must be the case that one of our assumptions
no triangular faces or no vertex with 3 edges
is true
I think it's slightly clearer phrased as a direct proof
assume no triangular faces, so 2f<=e
but that is the gist indeed?
by euler, e<=2v-4
I think I do understand that
so the >3 degree for all vertices can't hold, so no triangular faces implies degree 3 vertex
yeah
ty Desync, do you mind if I take some time to try to sort through this and then tag you once I have ?
maybe 10-15 mins
sure
okay awesome
@maiden glen hopefully I’ve adequately summarized your points?
I think it makes good sense
yeah
technically, both assumptions could be false, so you should handle that separate case if you're doing it as a contrdiction
if both assumptions are false
then we have a triangular face and a vertex with 3 edges
this is fine
sure yeah
yeah
nonetheless
alright ty very much desync
that one had me stumped
goodnight!
.close
Closed by @vapid shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
time for lectures for me 
rip
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I was wondering if anyone knows how to do this step by step. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
for context, its a high school maths investigation for calculating the area of k trapeziums under this sine curve:
I know I can use integration but I am trying to find other methods
@quick thorn Has your question been resolved?
@quick thorn Has your question been resolved?
@quick thorn Has your question been resolved?
at least for natural numbers
@quick thorn Has your question been resolved?
Yeah ill try that
Closed by @quick thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To get Mass can you do M=F(g+a)?
Seems like more of a physics question, we have a server in #old-network
I’ve asked plenty of physics questions here before
F = ma
If it has mass in it and you know the other variables, I don't see why you can't find mass with it
Ok thanks
How would I do 12?
figure out how fast you were accelerating the cart
Would final velocity be 0?
Initial will be 0 I think.
Oh yea
To get vf can I use gravity for acceleration in this case)
?
Or would it not work like that
you are accelerating the cart, gravity isn't doing anything here
no because you're not traveling at a constant velocity throughout that time

hi you should get your own channel, refer to #❓how-to-get-help
oh, i apologize. thank you
I’m actually not sure where to start can I get some help
you should have an eqn for motion under acceleration
but here I'll give u one
$s_f = s_0 + v_0t + \f12a_0t^2$
hayley
👍
oh that should just be at² bc this only works for constant acceleration
it is too small
you elected to divide by 1/2 which confused you instead of multiplying by 2
@tardy stag want me to make you anything in return for you helping me?
Wow looks nice.
they look so pretty! but those look like they take so much time, I'd feel bad asking you to make something like that for the like two minutes I spent on you
2 minutes is still time lol
.close
Closed by @wintry garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You can decide next time if you want anything 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
um..
so that the y intercept matches
when x = 0, what is y
do i have to do that every time to check my answer
yeah
yeah
Closed by @strange fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In this video of 3blue 1 brown}
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e50Bj7jn9IQ&list=PLZHQObOWTQDPD3MizzM2xVFitgF8hE_ab&index=15
He is equating the mean of eigen values and mean of diagonals
Why is it equal ? Am I missing something?
How to write the eigenvalues of a 2x2 matrix just by looking at it.
Need a refresher on eigenvalues? https://youtu.be/PFDu9oVAE-g
Thanks to Tim for the jingle: https://www.youtube.com/acapellascience
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share the videos.
Special thanks ...
Trace of a matrix is sum of its eigenvalues
Closed by @potent plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I thought everything to the power of 0 is 1
(-2)^0 not -(2)^0
Closed by @strange fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help would be greatly appreciated. This shouldn't be hard I just don't understand what could be wrong here
❤️
@slender granite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tf
<@&268886789983436800>
If you are NF fan: Great music taste
Don't think it is possible as the server has to many members
Please don't troll / be inappropriate like this @alpine sable
I'll give u 2 weeks
2 weeks is kinda much i can do same in 2 days with yo mom
but
am a normal man without any autism or dawn sindrom so
and please stop this. this is chat for normal ppl not with retardations like u
be more serious
.close
Closed by @tardy stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how come the direction vector if a line is parallel to the norm of a plane? or is that false
what is the relationship between the line and the plane
not sure
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you. A picture or screenshot is best.
If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still help helpers help you. Do your best to translate.
Ex. 12. Give an equation of the plane that is orthogonal to the line (x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1) + (1, -1, 2)t andpasses through the origin.
Why can n = (1,-1,2)
thats what it means for a line to be orthogonal to a plane
^
basically by definition
@mellow linden Has your question been resolved?
(Please don't use the words "retardation" or "autism" etc as insults, this is unacceptable in this server)
i wont but that guy was really messy (sorry)
Closed by @mellow linden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Guys I found the lamest username of all time
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somone solve the Integral for me? and also explain their steps? please
i have no idea how to solve the integral and it seems complicated
@stone breach Has your question been resolved?
L = int_{a}^{b}sqrt(1+f'(t)²)dt
.close
Closed by @stone breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this question right here
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @manic leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
45-The image representes a center circumference 0.
It is known that:
• [RST] is an equilateral triangle inscribed on the circumference;
• [SU] is the side of a square inscribed on the circumference.
Determines, in radians:
45.2- UST
idk why its not pi/6
@scarlet ridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @scarlet ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i workout which ones are subsets
and how would i test whether they are closed under addition or multiplication
@woven sphinx Has your question been resolved?
@woven sphinx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woven sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have to use the product rule to differentiate the function, but I'm lost on where to start and the process
do you know what the product rule is?
Do you know product rule?
yes i do but what mean to differentiate the function
calculate the derivative
how’d you learn the product rule without learning what differentiate means 
Closed by @forest heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello again
Show that the subgroups of ( (\mathbb{Z}, +) ) are the ( a\mathbb{Z} ) where ( a \in \mathbb{N} ).
lilisworld
Sorry, it's my fault
Closed by @nocturne iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is |a + b|^2 and why
what are a and b
any real numbers
then the same as (a+b)^2
cause it doesnt matter whether a+b is negative or positive, the square is the same anyway
If we want to prove that for all real numbers a and b, |a + b| <= |a| + |b| is true, can I do cases?
- if a < 0 and b < 0, they're equal
- if a >= 0 and b >= 0, they're equal
- if a < 0 and b >= 0, the left side is less than OR EQUAL TO the right side.
◻️
is it?
the last case?
what if a is so much negative that |a+b| is huge again
you can do it by cases but it needs to be slightly more involved
I argue the same thing as the problem says
you basically just write "case 3: works out"
case 3: if a > b and b != 0, then |a + b| < |a| + |b|. If a < b and b != 0, then |a + b| < |a| + |b|.
if b = 0, then they are equal.
we want that to be true for all cases so the entire thing is true
well we want it to be true
doesnt mean that it automatically is
we still have to argue that it is true
Oh so we just add "assume that this is true" at the beginning?
Then prove that assumption?
ok so then i add "assume that this is true." and then do my cases.
no you cant just assume what you want to show
so one possible case is that b>0 and a<0, but 0<-a < b. then 0< a+b<=b and therefore |a+b| = a+b <= b = |b| <= |a|+|b|
I have to go now
@fair musk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a
if you start at a vertex v and have two neighbors u,w, then a path of length 4 could be v,w,v,u,v. but you dont want to include those
does it also count u->v-w->v-u because its deg*(deg-1)*2 to count his case and the one u mentioned?
since deg edges can come in and only deg-1 can go out
@mortal trellis
well you can either go to u or to w first
but if you start at u and then go over v to w and back thats just the same path
so 4 ways to count it then?
why 4
start at v or u = 2, start at w go left or right = 2
and need to choose 2 points adjacent to v
you cant go right at w. I am not sure what you mean
ok sry its too late for me to be awake and trying to help
good luck
@silver tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I simplify this to that? Can someone break it down into steps? Thank you.
square both side
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
ok that makes sense
thanks
.close
Closed by @foggy mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what quadrant is -5pi/3 on the unit circle
@thin sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thin sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
z table related
You might want to draw this so you know what part of the z-table to look at
If x exceeds 150, are we concerned with values to the left or to the right of 150?
Yes
So probability is area under the curve, right?
So that means the area to the right of 150 is 0.9
So both of these are wrong
huh then what should this look like?
Sketch this
Yes (though my that is not a good-looking bell curve lol)
lol i agree i drew that with 2400 dpi mouse
so the probability for this is z score + table value?
@upbeat gorge
0.5*
I mean it depends on your z-table
pls explain
you’re looking for the mean tho
right
Well first you want the z-score of 150
my z table only goes to 3.09
CST (please ping when replying)
isnt 150 the x ?
It is
i dont get how the z score could be found in this case
looked online and its 1.28 but idk why
@upbeat gorge
Can I see your z-table
ah
So it calculates the area from the mean to the z-score
in our case, the area from z-score to mean plus the entire second half is 0.9
Ok
So we’re looking for what value
Find ?
0.4 is not the z-score
0.4 is the probability in the inner rows/columns of the table
right i mean the z score for .40 = .1554
@upbeat gorge
or is it the z score closest to .40?
.4015?
I hope btw you know probability of a z-score is not the z-score
oh mb i confused those 2 together
let me try again, the z score corresponding to the probability on the table closest to .40 is 1.28
right @upbeat gorge
Yes
That is best
Although
Recall 150 is under the mean
So the z-score isn’t 1.28
could you show what that situation looks like graphically?
so its actuallly -1.28?
@upbeat gorge
Yes
Refer to my image a while ago
the red part you drew is the 150 right
is the mean the center line? or is it a dot or value within the red shade? could you explain that?
@upbeat gorge
The red part is the probability lmao
😅 but i don't get what "under the mean" means
basically if it’s below the mean the z-score is negative
And if it’s above the mean it’s positive
We’re looking for the mean
(The z-score of the mean is 0, but the mean itself isn’t 0)
But yeah, you have the z-score, you have X, and you have the SD
you can now solve for the mean
yeah i just wanted to make sure i don't confuse anything
thanks for your help man really appreciate
np
.close
Closed by @high zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how come for this when I move 20 to the right, it subtracts it and I eventually end up with x = -1 right
so
i solved this
did the sam ething
and ended up with
d=7
checked the answer sheet and its apparently 5?
and the only way to get that
is to do the opposite and keep it the sanme when i move 3
to the right
QuasiStar 超新星
Closed by @hardy aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @sweet basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to show that if 5 divides n with a remainder of 4, than 10 divides 2n^2 + 2n + 3 with a remainder of 1.
I dont know what I did wrong but I found that, if 5 divides n with remainder of 4, than 2n^2 + 2n +3 has a remainder of 7
<@&286206848099549185>
found the error
I wrote down the problem wrong to begin with. my math is right
.close
Closed by @rustic nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get some help on part b?
I was thinking of something like this but obviously it includes integrals
also pretty unfamiliar with indicator random variables so not sure how to apply that here
@cloud token Has your question been resolved?
@cloud token Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cloud token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m horrible at math and could really use some help with a couple of problems, starting with this one. :(
So for this, your domain would be your range of x-values. From the graph you can see that the line goes from x = -9 to x = 8. So from this, you could say that your domain would be between -9 and 8, which in interval notation would be Domain = [-9, 8]
I'm assuming the next question is for range, in which you would do the exact same thing but for the y-values instead
Ohhhh okay thank you
For some reason I kept getting [8, -9]
I could also really use help on this one too
Like thats what the website was saying is the answer?
while technically not wrong, its more common to go with the smallest value first
No it’s what I kept getting myself but I had a feeling it was wrong :(
It wasn't completely wrong, you just need to make sure you're putting the smallest value, in that case -9, first
you had the right numbers, just need to put them in the right order
Ohhh okay that actually helps a lot I’ll have to fix some of my past answers then
For this you would do the same, but since you arent given any values on the axis you would just need to count the number of lines
Huh ?
So its similar to the first question where yoiu want to find the range of x-values in the graph
Ohhh okay
Since there are two lines, you would just go off of the furthest left point and furthest right, which in this case is the whole graph
and since there is no numbers labelling how far it goes you would just need to count
I have no clue how to do this what do ever :’)
Okay that’s easy tyty
I'm not exactly sure what it's asking, since theres two questions technically
Ignoring the top line, you would just substitue the x-values into the equations, so for example in the first one a) f(x) = x - 4 find x = 7, you would just put 7 where the x is for f(x) = 7 - 4 and so on for the other questions
.close
Closed by @harsh sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
To be more specific. The last two parameters
I have an equation already that fits the first three
r(x)=(x-2)(x-1)/(x+3)^2(x-2)
Please someone help
This looks like it also fits the fourth
just looking at it analytically
it touches I think. but it doesnt intersect or have an x intercept
thats why i am confused
touching it still counts as an x-intercept technically
I know it bounces due to multiplicity but idk how to do that
would I have to change something in the numerator to still have it touch and have an intercept at (1,0)?
Just graphed it, and looks like there is still an intercept
ohh ok. I thought the bend would be more drastic. Like a parabola alsmot
almost
so does my equation seem to fit all parameters?
It definitely fits the first 4, i'm just very stumped by the last one sorry
No worries. Hopefully I get a 9/10. Thank you for the help. I don’t have a great professor so I normally teach myself and I just had trouble with this one.
It seems like it will also fit the last condition
I'm not extremely familiar with how to check for it, but the concavity is positive at and after 1
I understand that, currently taking a break from studying for a course under a similar professor 
The multiplicity is odd I think if you take the two factored pairs. So that would mean it touches and bends
If I’m not mistaken
I think I got it. Thank you again!
.close
Closed by @plucky dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
WIAT
ow my eyes
Or if u wanna get that result in a more convoluted way, do some division
dabbingpotato
$\frac {x^4 -16+16}{x^4 -16}$
Stephen
This^
Now u can just break the fraction apart
It’s just adding 0 so
dabbingpotato
Yes
Why?
Wat
Rewrite it as difference of squares
dabbingpotato
bro
i know how to do it
its just
gonna take
lots
of
time
and
i
hate
clamaculus
fuck
Well it’s a good thing u hate clamaculus and not calculus cuz calculus can be pretty fun once u get the hang of it
wait
why didn't we just use partial fraction decomposition in the first place
oh wait
nvrmind
i know why
okay i can do this by myself from now
but basically
you would just use ln on a/x-2 and b/x+2
and just use u sub on cx + d/x^2 +4
right
ok i got it
thank you guys so much for the help
.close
Closed by @tribal valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could anyone explain how that 2x3 maxtrix was formed here
is it just this?
aka applying the transformation to the basis elements of P2, then representing them in columns of a matrix
@junior warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is f not differentiable at one it has a defined point and no discontinuity
it's a sharp turn though
if you take the derivative, you will notice it is not continuous

