#help-0
1 messages · Page 311 of 1
hmm
okay I have to go now
ty for ur help
Closed by @gilded cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help me with some algebra
Let $g(x)=2x-4$, and $(f\circ g)(x)=\frac{7x+3}{5x-9}$, find $f(2)$
Glitchy
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
do you know how to find inverse functions?
the f-1(x) thing?
yes but not for f
$f = (f \circ g) \circ g^{-1}$ is the idea you'll want to use here
Ann
so you will in fact need the value of $g^{-1}(2)$ to find the thing they ask for
Ann
do you understand why this is the case
Closed by @misty cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i please get a detailed solution, i am stuck on this problem, unable to solve after factoring
express in reduced form
i might be doing something wrong
what do i do after this
im sorry if thats a dumb question
this is the answer
why does this say (a) while your problem says (b)
anyway (x^2 - 1) is factorable
bad wording
(x^2 - 1) is a difference of squares yes but you do not have any variables named a or b in your problem
why cross out the whole (x-1)^2 tho
@winged haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @winged haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I have two matrices: C and F. C is a symmetric square matrix of real values, and F is a complex matrix with more rows than columns, but all its columns are linearly independent.
I follow along this guy's work, right? And he gets for some equation the result Hermitian(F)*C*F. I, on the other hand, avoided solving the equation in the traditional way (i.e., knowing what you are doing) by instead reading Wikipedia articles on matrix properties until I got PseudoInv(F)*C*Transpose(PseudoInv(F)).
Are these identities?
Wait I made my question too long:
tl;dr PseudoInv(F)*C*Transpose(PseudoInv(F)) == Hermitian(F)*C*F?
@half blaze Has your question been resolved?
I shall ping <@&286206848099549185> but once.
You can reping helpers
Yeah part of me thinks I should like, get a latex representation of this problem to make it more attractive to look at.
$F^{#}C(F^{#})^T = F^{H}CF$?
chazm
Where H is the conjugate transpose, and # is the Moore-Penrose PseudoInverse?
And T is just a transpose
@half blaze Has your question been resolved?
Ok because that one guy implied I could I shall ping <@&286206848099549185> one more time, but I kind of understand that this question is a bit niche.
Ok let the record show that I've somehow made negative progress with this.
I found a property saying that the pseudo inverse of a matrix with orthonormal columns
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
I found a property saying that the pweudo inverse of a matrix with orthonormal columns is its complex conjugate
But that would imply...
$F^{#}C(F^{#})^T = F^{H}CF^{*}$?
chazm
Closed by @half blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i am back this time i would like help with this question
i have diffrentiated x correctly but the answer say that i have diffrentiated y incorrectly
incorrect
use product rule
so t+1e^t?
oh wait t diffrentiates to 1, and te^t diffrentiates to te^t so will it be 1+te^t
- not =
so 1+e^t?
how did you get one
a' = 1
and b=?
,rotate
yes
It's a long way of doing it lol
Closed by @vast burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this the right approach towards a ODE equation?
I believe something is quite off
@topaz tartan Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@topaz tartan Has your question been resolved?
@topaz tartan Has your question been resolved?
lim sin 3x=0
X—>0
Proof using epsilon delta definition
Closed by @topaz tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand the question, can anyone help
it is phrased in somewhat of a stilted manner
It's from the chapter simultaneous linear equation in my book
would you like to have it rephrased in a more understandable way?
Yeh :3
@vale wigeon it's similar to question that some had for 10x + y
There are two numbers.
Doubling the larger number, then subtracting 16 gives half of the smaller number.
Dividing the larger number by 2, then subtracting 1 also gives half of the smaller number.
Find the two numbers.
Alright
does this make the problem make sense to you?
Closed by @chilly halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone explain how - 298K (75jk/mol) became 22400?
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
<@&286206848099549185>
dont ping the helpers before 15 mins!
Oh sorry i thought 15 mins has passed
Ok
Send the dm then
Cant
Not accepting dms
Thats why
Closed by @cloud jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Find inflection points for
fx=|x-2|+|x-4|
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does the sentence circled in red mean?
If μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation, it's asking you for the percentage of your data between μ-2σ and μ+2σ
thanks :)
You'll find that this should be essentially all of it except for a few outliers.
ok
95% right?
Yeah
Closed by @edgy moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when i expand the bracket as the first step, i get positive 5/2, but when i divide both sides first by 5, i get -5/2
is it not possible to expand the brackets?
30x + 35 = 20x + 10
You should get the same answer either way
Yw
.close
Closed by @deep grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me on this please
its physics but if you know how to help please help
U can refer physics server for help #old-network
I know this is a math server but where are you stuck
i think a) is correct but im not really sure how to do b)
wait one sec
I don't think a is correct
I think you have to find the value of all the resistances
tbh
find the equivalent resistance in all the circuit and apply ohm law
how do i do that
you dont have a course on that ?
no im just forgetful
you add the resistances (the way to do that changes depending on wether the resistances are in line or parallel)
isnt it v=ir on all the resistors
welp, on the right there are parallel resistances there, you apply this :
1/Req = 1/30 + 1/60
you know what a parallel resistance is?
so series and parallel
yup
yeah series mb
yeah, but only for parallel resistances
yeah
would i have to redraw the diagram or can i just do it as it is
redraw if you want to add the equivalent resistance
no need though
I mean it could help you picture it better
oh okay
but if the question doesnt ask it then I don't see why you can't just do the calculations
how would i do it
the equivalent resistance will help you find the current
and is a) right
how though
no, you used only the 20Ohm resistance
we said no
how do u do it then
do you read what we say :/
find the equivalent resistance of all the circuit and apply ohm law then
so to find the current in the whole circuit, you need to find the equivilent resistance and apply Ohm's law
so we need to find the equivalent resistance
yes
yeah :/
I said you don't have to redraw the diagram
ohh okay
but it would make it simpler right
Is this correct
as the simplified drawing
yes it is
yeah
but you just redraw the diagram you did nothing yet
although try to end the voltometer lines where the 60 Ohm resistor starts and ends
you don't really have to though
its still correct
yeah
is the first step finding the thing for 20 ohms
what thing
Listen, the question asks to find the current on A1 right?
nah dw
I was confused when I learned that too
ok the meter at A1 measures the whole current in the circuit
to find the whole current we told you what to do
^
ohh okay
np
ty for helpong @rustic flax
to find out the equivalent resistance yk how i have to add resistance for each point
oh wait
im so dumb
the resistance is given
sorry
you have 2 ways to find equivalent resistance :
when the resistances are in parallel, you do 1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 where Req is the equivalent resistance
when the resistance are in serie, you just add the resistance
here on the right, you have 2 resistances in parallel
use the formula I just gave you
1/Req1 = 1/30 + 1/60
1/Req1 = 3/60
Req1 = 20 Ω
Req = 20 + 10 + 20
Req = 50 Ω
it is
yes, I said after all that you can use ohm law
to find the current of the whole circuit of course
I didnt calculate idk
i just did 12V/50ohms
V = R I
I = V/R
I = 12/50
well you found the answer for A1
wait how is a1 the entire circuit's current
is it because it hasnt been split up by any resistors
@vague coral
in series, the current is the same in all the wires
but on the right, we have two resistance in parallel so the current is split on 2 two wires
so how would you do question b)?
@vague coral
kirchhoff law again
oh okay
could u explain that in my scenario pls
im a bit confused on how to do that
you calculated the current measured by A1, and you can find the current measured by A2, so you can deduce the current that goes through the resistance of 60 ohms
In short, the sum of the currents that go in a node is equal to the sum of the currents that go out of the node
isnt it all just going to output
@proper garnet Has your question been resolved?
@proper garnet Has your question been resolved?
kirchhoff current law
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Dumb question but, how do I go about calculating probability?
I tried googling but no one explained it well enough for me to understand.
My hypothetical is... Let's say I have to answer a question that has 3 answers but it has 2 right answers. Not only that but you get to guess 2 times. What's the probability I get the answer right?
Well here for example, when each answer has the same probability to be correct (here it would be 2/3), the probability that you pick the 2 correct answers out of 3 is the same as the probability of not picking the wrong answer, which is 1/3
Many formulas can be used to compute probabilities of an event.
Dumb question but, how do I go about calculating probability?
well this question is too broad tbh lol
You have to calculate the probability of both failing / getting it correct if I recall correctly
My hypothetical is... Let's say I have to answer a question that has 3 answers but it has 2 right answers. Not only that but you get to guess 2 times. What's the probability I get the answer right?
gonna need some clarification here -- there could be at least three different scenarios here:
- this is a "select all that apply" question with 3 checkboxes, the correct answer is to select exactly 2 particular checkboxes, and we know this. and we get two guesses.
- same as the previous scenario, but we don't know that the correct answer has 2 checkboxes ticked (thus more options for us to be wrong)
- this is a multiple-choice (select only one) question, in which 2 of the answers are correct. we need to hit at least one of the right answers and are given two guesses to do so
@haughty fiber which of these do you mean
@haughty fiber Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hcf for q5 is 18
But 72 divided by 18 is 4
And 90 divided by 18 is 5
THEY AINT EFEN EQUAL
THEY SHUD BE EQUAL AAA
We never asked to get the same amount of pieces from each rope
We only asked for all the pieces to be of the same length
Because we want the greatest length
True, you could cut them all in lengths of 1
But that's not "the longest pieces of equal length possible"
Well i could just find the highest factor for both of thrm
Instead of finding the common one
the highest factor is the whole rope
so you don;t make cuts, and you don;t end up with equal sized ropes
so has to be common
Huh
common is what makes them equal
We want the resulting cuts to ALL be of equal length
And we also want to have the greatest length for each of them that verifies that
I thought the q said both of the ropes to be equal when cut in pieces like piece of rope A should be equal to piece of rope B
"factor" ensures that there's no leftover rope
"highest" ensures the pieces are longest
"common" ensures you don't get 2 different piles but one pile
Maybe its 5 for rope b coz its 90 like bigger scale
Yea
I understand your confusion, but the criterion is not about the amount of cuts, it's about their lengths
maybe you;re missing that pieces of rope 1 have to be equal to pieces of rope 2, not just between the same rope
So this true?
that's actually not explicitly said
Like
If they wanted long pieces cut evenly for each rope, they couldve just picked the highest factor
For both numbers
Like for 90, 45 like 45 m in two parts of the rope
And for 72,36
36 m into two parts of the rope
yes, that's not the goal
Then?
What the point of common
If piece of rope 1 (4m for each part) ain't equal to piece of rope 2 (5m for each part)
you will get pieces of length 36 and pieces of length 45
and they want pieces to be of one length
and they don't really say that
but they mean it
Unless
unless you use the same factor
Unless, They actually meant both of em to be equal and for rope 2 it was 5, coz it was 90m so the scale was bigger
)-:
the amount of ropes you get doesn't have to be equal
like
72 divided by 18 is 4
90 divided by 18 is 5
all pieces are 18
18 is the length and the length is what we want
oh right, you said it's not the length
it should be the length
now you understand everything
Oh yea the end part of the question said about length so 18 is the length so for rope A, (72m) the rope will have 4 pieces each of 18m length and the rope b (90m) will have 5 pieces of 18m length each
yep
Closed by @dire mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Smh
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok i already sent it here before but i still cant solve it
331
i need to solve it, but without using derivatives
i need to factorize it and also use functions equal to infinitesimals
oh never fucking mind
i got it
.close
Closed by @idle maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ig it is done by multiplying by conjugates of num and denom
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f is an even function
g is an odd functoin
a) fg
is this even or odd?
my work:
f (x) = f(-x)
g(x) = -g(-x)
fg
f(-x) (-g(-x)) = - fg(x)
what do i do from here?
what's the defintion of even and odd functions?
even: f (x) = f(-x)
odd: g(x) = -g(-x)
or u can write it as:
even: f(-x) = f(x)
odd: f(-x) = -f(x)
but i prefer the first one, helps me see it better
but not that i have -fg(x)
what do i do from there
how can i deduce if its even or odd
you have a new function fg, defined by fg(x) = f(x)g(x), just check the even, odd properties on this new function
So:
- if
f(x)is even, thenf(-x) = f(x). - if
g(x)is odd, theng(-x) = -g(x).
So then you you get f(-x)g(-x) = f(x)(-g(x)) = -f(x)g(x)
so waht does that tell you that we went from f(x)g(x) to -f(x)g(x)?
can you use this instead
it helps me make sense of it more
im not sure
from fg(x) to -fg(x) just means that all the y values are negative
so instead of q1 ur in q3?
thats not a reflection of the y-axis nor symmetrical in respect to the origin
it would be neither right? @sour dove
that's an incorrect definition of odd.
What f(-x) = -f(x) means is that whenever you have a negative x value, the output is the negation of of the positive x value
there's not translations to the function happening there
🧍
u still get -(fg)x
how can u tell that from -(fg)x it is an odd function? @sour dove
ok I haven't seen that definition. I guess it makes sense but I've always seen odd defined my way. Same difference I guess.
regardless, it's an odd function
because it fits your definition just fine
i got -(fg)x
bruh yall are confusing me 🧍
Yes, he's a spammer, ignore him
So, if fg (-x) = -fg(x) it means that fg is odd, right? @gilded cliff
i got:
f(x) g(x) = f(-x) (-g(-x)) =
im using these defintions of even and odd
Yes
Which are the ones you stated at the beginning
where do i go from here
bro
Again, you know that f is even, therefore f(-x) is f(x)
so the negative goes on the outside:
- (f(-x) * g(-x)) = - (fg) (-x) ?
then by this definition its odd
Almost, it should be:
(f(-x) * g(-x)) = - (fg) (x)
And this means that fg is odd, yeah
-g(-x)
what about the negative in front of the g
Leave it there
u took it out for the left side of the equation here
Remember that $-g(-x) = (-1) \cdot g(-x)$
Alberto Z.
ig my question is that how do u go from:
f(-x) * g(-x) = fg(x)
<@&268886789983436800>
You don't reach fg(x), but **-**fg(x)
nah i just mean generally:
so lets say you have: h(-x) * k(-x)
bro x^5 is not even
wouldnt that give you: hk(-x)? @winter light
but they said that it's odd right here. Que?
is this wrong?
It depends on what types of functionjs h(x) and k(x) are
both are even
If both are even, then h(-x)·k(-x) = h(x)·k(x)
Yes, because you said that h and k were even, meaning that h(**-x) = h(x) and also k(-**x) = k(x)
@winter light what would f o g be then
How are f and g? f is even and g is odd?
f(g(x)) = -f(g(-x)) =
No, let's do things one step at a time
First, let's call f(g(x)) with another name, such as h(x), ok?
hmm alright
Now, if we show that h(-x) = **-**h(x), then our f(g(x)) (which was h) will be odd
If, instead, we show that h(-x) = h(x), then our f(g(x)) (which was h) will be even
No, $f \circ g$ will be even
Alberto Z.
h(-x) = f(g(-x)) = f(-g(x)) = f(g(x)) = h(x)
This means that h(-x) = h(x), therefore h is even
But h was f o g, hence f o g is even
Yes, that's another possible way, correct👍
@gilded cliff Has your question been resolved?
The simplest way to remember even and odd functions is to firstly recognize that even sounds like "smooth," "nice flow," etc. Its even about the y axis (symmetrical). Now how can we prove this scenario? Well lets say we had I x I a symmetric function and applied a horizontal reflection. So I -x I it would still be symmetric.
For odd function picturize a linear function x where it would not be symmetric about the y axis.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone explain how to raise a regular number to the power of a matrix? Like, say I had to evaluate this:
1 2
2 ^ 2 1
or this:
1 2 3
2 ^ 3 2 1
how would I go about doing that?
So you just raise the number to the power of each element, and replace each element with that, unless the element is zero, in which case you just leave it?
No. did you read the article?
I did, and that's what I thought it said. Could you explain it for me?
For non diagonal square matrices you have to diagonalize then follow the procedure
Work through the example at the bottom
@winter light
@blissful garden Has your question been resolved?
Ok, so I'm not familiar with eigenvalues, eigenvectors, or the taylor series. Is there some simple way to do this, or is knowing like advanced calculus the only way to do it
I'm asking because I had this question on an SAT prep thing. No shot all the questions are like "John is buying apples for $5 each and bananas for $3 each, but he can't spend more than $20 - make an equation to model this" and "How many radians are in 180 degrees" and then the only way to do this one problem is with eigenvectors and shit
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185> any simple way to diagonalize a matrix, or solve the above problem? Or do you have to know advanced calculus to do it?
diagonalize a matrix
That's a linear algebra topic, not calculus
Okay. That makes sense - I was just struggling to follow the explanation on the website riemann linked me. For example, stuff like "If we write AA in its eigenvector form, then A=SΛS −1 ⟹e A
=Se ΛS −1 , where SS is the eigenvector matrix and \LambdaΛ is the diagonal eigenvalue matrix", and stuff about the Taylor series.
So, is there a way to diagonalize a 2 x 1 matrix, so that you can then raise a regular number to the power of it?
You can diagonalize square matrices
Gotcha. So, is it possible to raise a regular number to the power of a 2 x 1 matrix by some method other than diagonalization?
@blissful garden Has your question been resolved?
Anyone have an answer?
Eh. Just gonna try and figure it out myself. I appreciate the attempted answers though 👍
.close
Closed by @blissful garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Positive negative integer help
I am having a test for positive and negative integer this Thursday’s we are covering , absoulte vaule, positive and negative integer on the number line postive and negative integer word probelms and more
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
You didn't ask anything specific
Oh mb
Like if you can give me probelms
And I can see if I’m knowledgeable enough
@lime bobcat
Is this similar enough
Nope
EX greater - 34,914 or - 78,828
Or absoulte vaule
EX what’s the absolute vaule of -20
oh
EX sort these on the number line - 83 -67 -60 12 13 24
And one last EX
Pick the integer 1/2 3/4 -1 1 1.2
Im asumming this too isnt what your looking for
its better to send in a specific question rather than asking for a review on a various amount of topics
Wym
like if you found a question that is relevant to your topics you need help on
thats the best way you can get the best out of this server
No i dont know anyone
yeah thats better send in those questions you've completed
I have to get ready for school which is tomorrow
I need to be extra prepared
And ready
Should I ping them when I’m done
@fleet owl cant stress enough but if you want to get as much help from here. You NEED TO SEND A QUESTION YOU NEED HELP ON or a question if you are confused on. You need to send specific questions not broad topics.
Sorry for caps
Anyways im going, if you find a question you need help on, use the helper ping
Let me pull up my computer
<@&286206848099549185> can I send you a picture of some class work I completed and you can send me a mini test of it I’m pulling up the screenshots now
He said to ping if I needed help
So sorry
We can't really give you a mini test ourselves, but we can show you where to take one on https://www.khanacademy.org/ for the same kind of thing as your classwork.
Can I send you some pictures of the answer key I completed the homework so it doesn’t matter and you can find the best possible place for me to go
Sure.
I’m gonna send you the paper for each there 7
OK.
And that’s everything covered
That’s every page
I’m sorry
@oak chasm
I’m sorry
That’s to much
But that’s Al the pages
@oak chasm
@oak chasm ?
For the number line stuff, it looks like this has some quizzes: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-sixth-grade-math/cc-6th-negative-number-topic.
And ordering numbers.
I didn’t understand this
I don’t know?
OK, so what absolute value does is it takes away a negative sign if there's one there.
Like |1| is 1.
Yes
There was no negative sign to take away, so it stays the same.
|-5| is 5
It had a negative sign and that was taken away.
Yes
I don’t understand still
OK, so let's say we have a number.
We look and see if it has a negative sign.
If it does, we remove it.
If not, we don't do anything to the number.
Why would we remove it
But wouldn’t the absoulte vaule of -10 be 10
Yes, it got rid of the negative sign.
Yes.
If we remove the negative
But it says for the number line
Right, so they want you to pick one of the points they made on the number line.
They want it to represent |-2/3|.
That means they want it to represent 2/3.
Does that make sense so far?
OK.
Question 3?
Which one
Question 5
Yes
They're all spaced a certain amount away from each other.
So, look at two of them that are marked with numbers, like the -8 and -4.
Those numbers are 4 apart from each other, right?
No, the numbers below the number line.
Those ones
Like -8 and -4 and 0 and 4 and 8.
Right, so each one is 4 more than the previous one.
Yes, so it goes up by 4.
Oh wait
Are you saying the smaller it is the bigger for the negative?
And the bigger the smaller
-8 + 4 = -4
-4 + 4 = 0
0 + 4 = 4
4 + 4 = 8
No, I mean start with the number on the left.
-8.
How much does it have to go up by to get the next number?
Like -8 goes up by what to get -4?
That's OK, you'll learn that in that section I linked to.
But how many | lines do you go right by to get from -8 to -4?
Like you start at the -8 of the | lines, right?
Yes
Then, you go over one | line to the right.
Then, you go over another | line to the right.
Then, you're at the -4 line.
Does that make sense?
Your going down to negative -4 right
No, I mean if you're trying to get from -8 to -4.
You start at the -8 line that's |.
You go to the right one more | line.
You go to the right one more | line.
Then, you're at the -4 line, right?
Yes, but we're ignoring that for now.
Ok
We just want to figure out the | marks for now.
Ok
Do you see how if you start at -8 and go two | marks right, you end up at -4?
Well, the | marks count for more than just 1.
They count for 2.
So, like, if you start at -8 and go one | mark to the right, you get to -6.
Yup that’s what I was thinking
Then, if you start at -6 and go one | mark to the right, you get to -4.
So, we need to know how far apart the | marks are, which is 2.
OK, so now we look at B.
Yes
It's halfway between two | marks, right?
Correct
So, it's like the | marks are 2 apart, but if we only go halfway, that's 1.
So, B is 1 to the left of the -4 mark, right?
Yes
So, what number is B?
5 and 1/2
Not exactly.
You have to remember two kinds of things.
One is the | lines.
One is the actual numbers.
Each | line is 2 away from the next one.
Yes
So, if you're halfway between two | marks, you're half of that, or 1 away from those nearby | marks.
So, what number is one away from -4?
Add 1 to it?
You add 1 thay would be -5 then subtract that is -4 in this case.
Because those are the numbers that are 1 away from -4, right?
Now, B is to the left of -4, right?
Correct
So, B is more negative than -4.
Correct
-3 is a bit less negative.
But -5 is one more negative than -4, right?
So, B must be -5.
Does that make sense?
OK.
The confusing thing about it is that the | marks are worth more than 1.
I see it now
Like, you'd think that going a 1/2 of a | mark from -4 would be like -4 1/2.
But since the | marks are worth 2 instead of 1, you get a half of that, which is 1.
It's kind of like money.
No
Try one of the MATH HELP (AVAILABLE) channels.
Just above the MATH HELP (OCCUPIED) section of the channels.
Like let's say each | mark is worth $5.
If you go halfway between them, that's like $2.50.
Let's say the number line is for money.
No, a different one.
Ok
Like let's say each | mark is $5 away from the next one.
And what’s the first number?
Let's say you're at the $50 mark.
You go halfway to the next | mark.
Since each | mark is worth $5, you went up by $2.50 to get $52.50.
That be $45 right?
Oh, if you want to go to the left, not exactly.
If you go halfway between the $45 mark and the $50 mark (because those are $5 apart like the | marks are), you get $47.50.
That's because you go down by half a mark, and each mark is worth $5.
So, you go down by half a mark, which is $2.50.
Yes
It be $45 if we went to the left
Yes, if you go left by a whole mark, it's $45.
Now this caught me off
Oh, how so?
How we get from $50 to $2.50
OK, so each mark is $5 away from the next one, right?
Yes
So, if you start at $50, and you go down half a mark, you don't go down by $5.
That would be if you went one whole mark to the left.
Because the marks are $5 apart.
You would be at $47 if you did a half
Yes, $47.50.
That's kind of how your problem works.
Each mark is $2 away from the next.
If you start at the -$4 mark and go half a mark to the left, that's -$5.
Because half a mark is worth $1.
Does that make sense?
Wouldn’t half a mark Be 2
Oh a half a mark is 1
Right.
So, that's how you figure that out.
First, you figure out how far apart the numbers written under the number line are.
Here, they were $4 apart, right?
Yes
They were 2 | marks apart, right?
Yes
Then, you look at where B is.
That went down by 3 tho
What went down by 3?
8-3 = 5
If b is -5 it be -3?
I'm not sure what you mean.
B is 5 rigjt
It's -5.
OK.
If you go half a mark to the right, you get -7.
Because each mark is worth 2.
And half a mark is worth 1.
So, if you start at -8 and go half a mark right, you get -7.
Right, and that's 1 mark to the right.
Right, you go one mark to the right to get to -6.
Then, you go a half of a mark to the right from -6 to get to -5.
It's important to realize that the | marks don't have to stand for 1. Here, they stand for 2.
If you got that, you'll understand the problems better.
OK.
Now what
Oh, B is at -5.
Yes
They give the answer in red.
So it’s -5? Or -4?
No, the | mark is for -4. Then, half a mark to the left is B, so since a mark is worth 2, half a mark is worth 1, so B must be -5.
Oh so the whole thing we had to figure out what was the number in between -8 and -4?
Or still more
Yes, you have to figure out what a mark is worth, then figure out the B point's value.
Ohhh
And we're done because we know it's -5.
No problem.
Goodbye God bless.
That Khan Academy link seems to be exactly what these problems are dealing with.
Alr
It has video lessons and practice quizzes if you're interested.
I’ll send it to my school email
OK.
There are probably other sites, but Khan Academy is pretty good and it's free.
I don't know if it covers everything you showed in those problems when we began, but it seems to either cover everything or very close to everything.
@fleet owl Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fleet owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys
3.2 seconds
only 9 digits
n = 10,000,000
wtf!
granted this is a very naive approach. but it seems like integration itself is a very slow process
@molten pivot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i need some help with this limit
i tried dividing the terms in the numerator by x
which gets me -3
but the teacher's work looks like this
not sure where the absolute value x came from
are we just considering the important variables or something? -3x/sqrtx^2?
oh i guess that's it
i always manage to figure out the solution after posting in this server
posting a question makes you structure the problem logically, which makes you sometimes find the missing hole in your understanding
basically you can ignore the +3 and the 5
and they have no effect
Closed by @real pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused and dont know how to graph well.
@solid fog Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@solid fog Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@solid fog Has your question been resolved?
