#help-0
1 messages · Page 298 of 1
You know that $(5+nx)^2 = (5)^{2} + (nx)^{2} + 2\cdot (5)\cdot (nx)$.
Enemagneto
And they've written $\left(1 + \frac{3x}{5}\right)^{n}$ in sigma notation?
windowsncheese
Well sigma + binomial
Yeah. In the answer that is given? yes
Ah okay that is what was confusing me a bit I didn't realize it was just an expression of $\left(1 + \frac{3x}{5}\right)^{n}$
windowsncheese
No. It's the same thing written in compact summation form.
Alright.
Firstly, you must know this:
(a+b+c) (m+n+ ... z)
When we open the brackets, a will be multiplied with each term inside the second bracket + b will be multiplied with each term inside the second bracket + c will be multiplied with each term inside the second bracket.
Brackets open like that. Do you know that?
@dense dove
Yes I know that
I have to leave soon. Please, be present.
Cool
Now, let's consider 25 from first bracket.
When we multiply it with the terms in second bracket, we'll only get one term of x.
From the 3x/5?
Term of x means that the term has x only with a coefficient.
Yes, but will the term be that?
No because you have to multiply it I think
Wait. Do you understand what that summation notation represent ?
$\sum_{k=0}^{n} (n\choose k) \left(\frac{3x}{5}\right)^{k}$
I think so, it means for every value, starting at k= 0, until n it will iterate through the next two sets of brackets with each increasing value of n until n is reached
i wrote that really weirdly
but it's basically just a sum of all the terms
Can you write the expanded expression on your notebook and show?
How can I do that without knowing what n is?
Enemagneto
That when expanded looks like this:
$${n\choose 0} \left(\frac{3x}{5}\right)^{0}} + {n\choose 1} \left(\frac{3x}{5}\right)^{1}} + \cdots + {n\choose n} \left(\frac{3x}{5}\right)^{n}}$$
Enemagneto
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Get it?
Ah I see, yeah I'm normally fine with binomial and know that. This is just the first time i've had to use n and seen summation notation in a question like this
Okay. Now, tell me the constant term in this
The constant term would be the first one because you're putting 3x/5^0 making it just 1
Yes
Then multiplying it by whatever (n,0) equates to on pascals triangle
Now, tell me the term of x.
The one just after it
Good.
Well (n,0) would always be 1 right?
So the constant terms of the expansion of $\left(1 + \frac{3x}{5}\right)^{n}$ is 1
windowsncheese
term*
Now, when we multiply this expanded form with 25 from the first bracket: when we multiply with the first term, we'll only get a constant since 25 * 1 is just 25.
when we multiply with the second term, we'll only get a term of x, since 25 is constant so product will only have x from the second term of expanded form of second bracket.
When we multiply with all the other terms after this, we'll get a higher power of x like x^2, x^3, and so on until x^n. We can ignore these higher order terms since we are only looking for terms of x.
Ok that makes sense
So, we get the term of x when multiplying with 25 as -
$$ 25 {n\choose 1} \left(\frac{3x}{5}\right)$$
Enemagneto
Get it?
It's not.
We have more terms remaining in the first bracket. you have to multiply with them too. You might get terms of x there as well.
Now, we see with 10nx.
Which term from right bracket expanded form will give term of x when multiplied with 10nx ?
Enemagneto
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Which is just:
$$ (10nx)\cdot {n \choose 0}$$
Enemagneto
Which is just 10nx no?
Which is:
$$ (10nx)\cdot 1$$
Enemagneto
Which is just 10nx.
So far now, you have had two terms of x.
This
Enemagneto
Which term from right bracket expanded form will give term of x when multiplied with $n^2x^2$ ?
Enemagneto
yes
so can we ignore them?
So, we don't get any terms of x from that.
What do you think? Do they contribute to coefficient of x?
They don't, and we are looking for the coefficent of x, so we can ignore them.
Enemagneto
Enemagneto
yeah i was about to say so
Now, you can solve. Right?
15nx + 10nx = 100x
Yes
Thanks so much, you were really helpful and patient with me đđđ
@dense dove Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dense dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question b
For this its just the same method as a solid of revolution but I dont square it, right?
And dont multiply by pi at the end
@warped topaz Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what?
Like to get the solid of revolution you do this right
Except you square the x first
So for this question you do the same, but you dont square the x
my brain is too small for that
You just do this, right?
but i can try
oh
I also think its right but im not 100% haha, thats why I created this thread to ask
can maybe another helper confirm?
<@&286206848099549185>
isnt it just asking for this
yeye
Is this the method?
Same as a solid of revolution except you dont square it
I don't think the pi should be there, this doesn't feel any different from a normal definite integral from 0 to 1
Ah yeye sry I mentioned that before just forgot to reapeat it lol
But other than that its correct right?
$ \int_{0}^{1} (1-x)e^{-x} dx $
I mean
why isnt it the integral of f(x) dx from 0 to 1
It is right?
Just a random image i pulled from google
I just want to know if my method is correct
$\int_{0}^{1} (1-x)e^{-x} dx$
nebula40
Yes
yeah I think this makes sense
Closed by @warped topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I make a table for part c?
Why do you need a table?
to solve it?
How exactly have you been taught to solve expected value problems?
Don't say "with a table"
well i know how to find expected values when im provided the data distribution in a way thats easy for me to understand like an expression or a piecewise looking thing but word problems makes it confusing for me
Well, you're given that there are three children, and we tend to assume that males and females are equally likely to be born (so 50% chance)
Does that sound like a distribution you've heard of?
yeah the heads and tails thing is similar right
Pretty much
so the outcome x would be either
0,1,2,3 girls
?
because those are the possibilities of getting however many number of girls in a 3 child family right
Yes
so 0 and 1 girls would have the same probability of 1/2
what about 2 and 3? is that 1/2 times 1/2 and 1/2 times 1/2 times 1/2
Careful
0 and 1 don't both have probability 1/2
Have you heard of the binomial distribution?
if you bring up what it looks like it might ring a bell
Well you have n independent trials, each with probability p of landing on a certain outcome (girl)
So for there to be 0 girls, we would need all three children to be boys. Given that the probability of getting a single boy is 1/2, the probability of getting 3 must be...
1/8?
Quite so
okay
and for 1 girl that would mean
getting 2 boys so the probability of getting one girl is 1/4
so what would that probability look like
Well, that situation describes getting either BBG, BGB, or GBB
Each such case carries what probability? (Two boys and one girl)
so isnt the probability of getting two boys 1/2 * 1/2
So if the probability of getting 0 girls is 1/8 how do we account for that
Well in that case, the only arrangement of the three children is BBB
So indeed it's as simple as just 1/2*1/2*1/2
Yeah
This is similar, though it requires one more step
Hm
not sure
(Also I gotta eat dinner BRB if youâre still on later that would be great)
,ti
The current time for steakanator is 02:07 AM (PDT) on Wed, 23/08/2023.
Probably not
,ti
You haven't set your timezone! Set it using the interactive timezone picker with ,ti --set.
I suggest looking up the binomial distribution to help you understand this scenario
@wheat isle Has your question been resolved?
Alright
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got x = - 7/4 but im not sure if its correct
I made 2 the same denominator as 4x/7
then I subtracted 14 from both sides
then divided both sides by 4
thats correct
Closed by @bleak citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont know how to do that
The table?
(f o g)(x) = f(g(x))
Ok donc tu vois comment appliquer la composition ?
Quand t'as une composition de plusieurs fonctions Ă la suite, tu commences par la fonction la plus Ă droite, puis tu fais de droite Ă gauche
Je te fais l'exemple de la premiĂšre, hâgâf(x)
\circ
$f \circ g$
giannis_money
Yes I know
I was talking about my symbol
I'm lazy đ
Anyways
Donc quand t'as une suite de compositions, t'Ă©cris hâgâf(x) = h[g(f(x))]
Pour la question 1 donc, on commence par f qui est le plus Ă droite
Donc on remplace f(x) par son expression, cos x
hâgâf(x) = h[g(cos x)]
On continue donc avec g, mais il faut faire gaffe un peu
Comme on cherche g(cos x) et qu'on connait g(x) = xÂČ +1
Chaque fois que "x" apparaßt il faut le remplacer par cos x comme c'est notre entrée
Donc g(cos x) = (cos x)ÂČ + 1
Tu vois comment ça marche ?
@modest wraith Has your question been resolved?
Oui c'est ça pardon @modest wraith
mhh kk lets me try the other oneeeeee
$h\circ g\circ f(x) = \sqrt{(cos(x))ÂČ + 1}$
rafilou2003
ca donne (racine carre cos x)^2 +1 ?
@pallid scarab
et le dernier cos racine de x^2 + 1
et tu peux faire le 2 du tbl stp
cooach tes passé ou?
Pardon je suis Ă l'ouest
J'ai mis ce serveur en mute, essaye plutĂŽt de me ping en MP
Le deuxiĂšme c'est bon
Tu peux mĂȘme simplifier en cos(x) + 1 mais on s'en fiche
J'arrive pas Ă comprendre celui lĂ
C'est peut-ĂȘtre bon mais la façon dont tu l'as Ă©crit me perturbe
Mets des parenthĂšses
cos racine de x?
rafilou2003
Et donc quand t'appliques g à ça, qu'est-ce que tu obtiens ?
japplique ca au x de h?
ou alors ca donne (cos (racine de x))^2 +1
@pallid scarab
C'est mieux !
Alors le 2)
fais le toi
att jai une question
genre
si on commence par h
ensuite et que ya encore 2etapes
on fait ca ? g(h) puis f(g ((h))
genre f sapplique pour g et h ?
f s'applique pour g(h(x))
Je te fais un exemple de comment ça aurait pu se passer autrement
pour $g\circ f \circ h(x)$
rafilou2003
j'aurais pu écrire que c'est g(f(h(x)))
et ensuite j'applique g Ă f(h(x))
ça me donne $f(h(x))^2 + 1$
rafilou2003
rafilou2003
rafilou2003
@modest wraith ça dépend de la méthode que tu préfÚres
daccord
rafilou2003
rafilou2003
et maintenant faut appliquer f Ă ce machin entre parenthĂšses
donc $f(f(x)) = \frac{1}{1-\Big(\frac{1}{1-x}\Big)}$
rafilou2003
LĂ il va falloir simplifier si on veut continuer
@modest wraith tu penses pouvoir simplifier ça ? C'est assez facile mais il ne faut pas se tromper avec les signes -
@pallid scarab non j'ai aucune idée
multiplie le numérateur et le dénominateur par (1-x)
$\frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{1-x}} = \frac{1-x}{(1-x)\Big(1-\frac{1}{1-x}\Big)}$
rafilou2003
Et du coup ça ns donné 1- 1/1-x ?
Infintely many solutions
bruv doin sarcasm and I replied with sarcasm that would not be considered as sarcasm
$\frac{1-x}{(1-x)\Big(1-\frac{1}{1-x}\Big)} = \frac{1-x}{(1-x)-\frac{1-x}{1-x}} = \frac{1-x}{1-x-1}$
rafilou2003
tu vois comment finir la simplification @modest wraith ?
Nn
1-x-1 =?
2
0
oui
rafilou2003
et lĂ c'est bon
D'accord je vois
en fait c'est mĂȘme mieux si on l'Ă©crit comme $1-\frac{1}{x}$
rafilou2003
Ah d'accord
rafilou2003
Vsy att
alors indice : on a pas calculé $f\circ f(x)$ avant pour rien
rafilou2003
aie bonne chance
ce que tu as écrit est correct
mais pour le simplifier bonne chance mec
Ah
je remets ça
Le -1
Il est pas au numérateur?
Ou alors je dois le mettre au mĂȘme dĂ©nominateur
Du coup ça donne -1x
attention tu fais -(-1x)
J'ai déjà changé les signes
$\frac{1}{1-(1-\frac{1}{x})} = \frac{1}{1-1+\frac{1}{x}} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x}}$
rafilou2003
ok
Ah bon
C'est quoi 1/(1/x) ?
Bah je multiplie nn?
ouais et ça te donne quoi?
oui x
dac
Merci bcp lamie
@modest wraith Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @modest wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
@weary quartz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i was doing a question in contradiction, and i got to a point where b^2 = 2(something)
my teacher said if b^2 is even, even b must be even
i remember her proving it but i forgot how
can someone explain why b must be even if b^2 is even
the contraposition of A => B is (not(B) => not(A))
and those are equivalent statements
ive only learnt 3 proofs till now
So the contrapositive of a statement is true, the original statement is true as well
lhs=rhs, induction and contradiction
well then contradiction is the closest
suppose b^2 is even and b is not even, ie b is odd
yes
Closed by @wide gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need some help understanding combination and binomial relation
are there two formulas for combinations?
Isn't
nCr= n!/r!
what is up with this:
nCr = n!/(r!(n-r)!)
This is nPr
umm 5c3 i wrote out 5 * 4 * 3/3*2=10
how is this valid?
if that is npr
$\frac{5 \cdot 4 \cdot 3}{3 \cdot 2} \neq \frac{5!}{3!}$
Ann
also parentheses around denom
umm so how is this equal to the second formula
They arenât
then why is the answer same
nPr and nCr are different
not my question
do you see the â sign in my tex thing
this
yeah
but if that is the accurate ncr formula
then how is that answer valid since it is not following the formula
$\frac{5!}{3! \cdot 2!} = \frac{5 \cdot 4 \cdot 3 \cdot \cancel{2 \cdot 1}}{(3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1) \cdot \cancel{(2 \cdot 1)}}$
Ann
does this answer your question?
oh so if i do till r factor in nr writing (n-r)! is not necessary
got it
as it cancels out
thanks
.close
Closed by @fickle musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
?
.close
Closed by @steep perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a function satisfying $f(x)=f(x+1)$ and $f(x)=f(x+\sqrt2)$ for any real number $x$. Is it necessary that the function $f$ is a constant function?
Puntre
No, but if you add the hypothesis that f is continuous then yes
Could you give an example of the function please.
how many x are there which need to satisfy f(x)=f(0)?
f(x) = 1 if there exist integers a and b such that x = a + b sqrt(2); f(x) = 0 otherwise
I think that works
No, if you add some other conditions like f being continuous then yes
Closed by @agile kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me find the local maximum and minimum for this function?
Cos(0x^2)?
umm the function as a whole
No I'm making note on how that is probably written wrong
this is roughly the function with its asymptote (x is roughly estimated)
Because in that case it's is just simply cos(0) which is 1. So redundant completely to write it as cos(0x)
ohh okay
Your question is still unclear! Why are you considering asymptotes when looking for extrema?
Open up your own help channel. This channel is already occupied
And please delete your message after you do
Thanks
oh i thought i did do that wrffff
im not sure i just put them there for reference
here, one second
oh wait
wrong one
i'll change it to cos(0)
Okay
Sooooo
Let's be clear
We are trying to find the local extrema of [
\map f x = \f3{x-6.2}+1
]
?
It's -(1-2)
Oki doki so do you know first derivative test
no i donât think so
What do you know about finding extrema?
nothing really we barely covered it which is why im struggling so much đ
actually now that i look at it i dont even think this graph has a max and min
You're correct but you have no way to assert that this is the case
@golden glade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @golden glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Been a long time since ive done math and this question is simple is but bothers me i forget how to do it can someone help me out real quick
given you have these answer options, the least headachey way of doing this would be to expand each one until you get a match.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
the usual way to do this when you dont have options is to split the middle term and factorize
!try
It's .close
.close
Closed by @vague dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"A" walks 10 hours daily and covers 480 km in 12 days. In how many days will he walk 20 hours daily to cover 360 km?
Can anyone solve it and explain the solve?
we won't solve this problem for you @dull prawn
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
2
Who walks for 20 hours tbh?
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I was stuck in the 20 hour to day transformation
"A" walks 10 hours daily and covers [REDACTED] in 12 days.
how many hours does A spend walking this way?
@dull prawn Has your question been resolved?
(x-2)(3x-3)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve this?
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
i tried finding individual sum say sum a= 24*7.8 like that and 700 =rel total and ~618= promtness total
that looks correct to me
the ranking stuff seems irrelevant to the problem (unless it comes up in later problems with the same data...)
,calc (6.5 + 6.9 + 4.1) * 100
Result:
1750
,calc (7.8 + 7.5 + 4.9) * 100
Result:
2020
ohh
700 =rel total and ~618= promtness total
these totals look strange though
Closed by @simple saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
We have defined cosine and sine using the unit circle. Recall how. Now consider an arbitrary right triangle. Show how, using that definition, we can show:
The cosine of an acute angle in the triangle is the adjacent leg divided by the hypotenuse.
The sine of an acute angle in the triangle is the opposite leg divided by the hypotenuse.
Im not very sharp at geometry or trigonometry so for this i might need some help
you know how the right triangle in the unit circle works yes?
no, im not sure
oh good place to start then lol
so you have a circle of radius 1, your unit circle, yes?
yes
and you draw a line from the center point to the circle, length 1, yes?
yes
you rotate it versus the +x axis, so angle of 0 is pointing +x, angle of Ï/2 is pointing +y, etc...
angle of 3Ï/4 is pointing diagonally top left, etc...
still with me?
yes
so, you see the radius line
and you can draw lines down to make a right triangle
the hypotenuse is ALWAYS 1 in the unit circle yes?
and the sides range 0 to 1, can't even be bigger, right?
hypotenuse is cos right?
don't go there yet and no
im trying to translate english in my head so yea its a bit slow for me
hypotenuse is the long side of the right triangle
yeah sorry, cos is the katete
which is the radius from the center to the edge
or whatever the english word is
anyways
we have a right triangle, the longest edge (hypotenuse) is stuck at length 1
the sides range from 0-1, ok
so, the literaly definition of sin and cos is
at any given angle Ăž, sinĂž is the length of the vertical side of the triangle formed by the radius at angle Ăž
and at any given angle Ăž, cosĂž is the length of the horizontal side of the triangle formed by the radius at angle Ăž
still with me?
sin and cos are just the lengths of sides in a right triangle in a unit circle
At any given angle Ăž, sinĂž is the length of the marked in red
yes!
okay:)
if the sinĂž is negative this means the triangle is going downwards instead of upwards
you understand that yes? just reflected down
yes, its reflected in the x-axis
yup
so, we know what sin and cos are, and what Ăž is, and what the unit circle is
for any given Ăž there is only one pair of sin and cos, and vice versa
because of this, we can use a known angle to find the size of sides of a right triangle with hypotenuse 1
however, right triangles are rarely hypotenuse 1 right?
right
in fact, sin and cos are the side length of a scaled right triangle, scaled to be hypotenuse length 1
let's say we have a triangle with sides 3, 4 and 5
we want to find the angles
we know the 90Âș is opposite of the 5 side, but how do we find the others?
we shrink the triangle by a factor of 5: the angles do not change
can you elaborate on what you mean with 90 degrees is the opposite of the 5 side
the right triangle with sides 3 4 and 5 has short side 3, medium size 4 and long side 5
the longest side in a right triangle is opposite the right angle that gives the right triangle its name
so we shrink it all down and while the sides change, who cares? we know the sides. we want the angles, which do NOT change when shrinking.
we have a new triangle with sides 3/5, 4/5 and 1 with the SAME angles
here lemme desmos this
Yeah, okay
(just a moment I'm bad at desmos)
Thank you:)
we start with the big red triangle
bottom edge 4, vertical edge 3, long hypotenuse length 5
we scale it down by a factor of 5 to make its hypotenuse 1 (and therefore fit inside the circle)
right ,yea
so we get a new, smaller, black triangle with side length 3/5, 4/5 and 1
but notice how the angles have not changed.
effectively, sin and cos are not just the measurements of the sides of a triangle in the unit circle
they are the ratios of the a side in a right triangle over the length of the hypotenuse (scaling it down by dividing by the length of the hypotenuse)
so cos is 4/5
yes
sin 3/5
(I can't read sorry) yes
right okay, i get it now
So what they mean is that a triangle is formed for every Ăž
yes
And since this triangle can be upsized, its properties are applicable to all other triangles of that sort
yup
all right triangles can be scaled like this
smaller ones too, like 5/100, 12/100, 13/100
and so the purpose of the unit circle and why they mentioned is, is because we can scale the hypotenuse down to 1, making it fit inside the circle
That makes a lot of sense, thanks. Do you wanna do the follow up with me as well?
sure, I can help!
oh, okay
0^2+1^2=1^2
A right triangle has sides a=1, b=â3 and c=2. What is the exact value of the angles expressed in radians?
so here i should do the same i guess
draw it out first, what is the hypotenuse?
hypotenuse is 2
so to get hypotenuse of 1, we have a = 1/2, b = sqrt(3)/2
mhm
you drew this out yes? which of a and b is sin and which is cos (vertical and horizontal)?
pi/3
Ï/3 is which angle though?
60
I mean, opposite of a? b? c?
opposite of b
pi / 3 = 60
one is 90
last one must be 30
nice, thanks
anything else you need help with?
I have to explain why cos(v)^2+sin(v)^2 = 1 is known as the "simple rule"
but I guess it relates to what you explained earlier with the hypotenuse always being 1
yup exactly
they're sides of a right triangle with hypotenuse 1 by definition
that is literally what they are derived from P: that and the pythagorean theorem
huh ok
I don't actually know the difference between arccos and cos
let's start with the simple one
cosĂž is the horizontal length at the angle Ăž
arccosx is the angle at horizontal length x
expressed in radians?
whatever unit you want
usually radians though yeah
degrees are hateful and want us to fail
pi/2
yes
right okay
so what is arcsin(1)? what is the angle where sin is 1?
90 degrees
also note that the answer here is ±Ï/3 sin cos(Ï/3)=cos(-Ï/3)=1/2
but arccos and arcsin have limited ranges by common consensus
right, because it can be under and upper?
this is in relations to workign with complex numbers and usually they can tell you what quadrant you are in
yup yup
arcsin(-sqrt(3)/2) = -pi/3 and pi/3 ?
no
sin(Ï/3) is sqrt(3)/2
uh wait -Ï/3 is right
sorry, used to seeing only positive angles P:
what are you confused about?
how to get cos(x) = 1/2 when it comes to the interval [-pi, pi]
normal interval makes sense
if the interval is -pi to pi
i dont know how to calculate it
i mean i dont even know how to find -pi on a unit circle
the angle -Ï?
think of it as -180Âș
[0, 2Ï] covers the whole circle, as does [-Ï, Ï]
hmmm
radians and degrees describe the same thing
it's just while degrees go from 0 to 360 radians go from 0 to 2Ï
they just have different scales
I called degrees awful earlier but really they're the same thing
i wouldnt know where to place -pi on a unit circle though
same place as -180Âș
at first converting between the two helps a lot
since most people find degrees more intuitive
yup
coincidentally, 180Âș and -180Âș end up at the same place
as with Ï and -Ï
so sin becomes cos and cos becomes sin
hmm how do I put this
you know how a full revolution changes nothing?
you go +360Âș and your line hasn't moved?
so the place shown by 27Âș is the same as (27+360)Âș
the angle 90Âș is the same as 450Âș (360+90)
so with -180Âș
we add 360Âș, full revolution it doesn't move
we find that -180Âș shows the same place as 180Âș
Right
makes sense now
What I dont understsand is how to find the value for R @cursive badger
R is the set of all real numbers
you are not trying to find R xD
by saying x â R you're being told the angle in sinx is a real number
like 2Ï/e or 3 or 378912*10^17
@lusty thunder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Working on part (a)
I have done the r_(k+1) part
but I am stuck on the r_(k+2) part now
I tried rewriting it using the r_(k+1) part but that didn't go anywhere
You can just apply the first identity twice btw
Wait wdym
Show your work 
wdym by this
First replace k with k+1 and you have [ r_{k+2} = \frac{r_{k+1}+1}{r_{k+1}} ]
A Lonely Bean
oh I tried doing the opposite
And just replace r_{k+1} with (r_k + 1)/r_k
Austin
Multiply top and bottom by r_k and you're good
@vapid shuttle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
doing limits in calc. this question kinda stumped me as iâve never seen âintâ before outside out python lol. âlim int(x) as x approaches 0 from the rightâ
so the graph would look like steps
with the closed circle on left, open on right
.close
Closed by @spiral pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I had this question
I got c
But apparently the answer is a
Hereâs my reasoning:
for the u vs x graph, we know, acceleration = v du/dx
this only works when acceleration is time independent
So acceleration is constant wrt time
So the acceleration is constant wrt x
But I canât seem to understand what went wrong
I would have said you were correct with c
Does it give any explanation as to why it's a
Yes
But I donât understand whatâs wrong with this
The instructor explained casually
That since slope of u-x graph is negative and constant and velocity is positive but increasing
Ah wait sorry, my mistake
It's a velocity displacement graph, not a velocity time graph
So you can't just use the derivative
Sure, so the acceleration at a point is the velocity multiplied by the gradient of the graph
This is why it's a not c
What do you mean by the conditions sorry?
Ohhhj The velocity is changing
Like when does that fail?
I'd be inclined to say never
Yah exactly
Iâd been stuck on that for so damn long
Thank you so so so much
I really appreciate your time
Have an awesome day man
.close
Closed by @vivid walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No worries :)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you find the slant asymptote of the equation f(x) = x/lnx? I can see there's what appears to be a slant asymptote, but idk how to calculate it
in precalc the method i learned for finding slant asymptotes is if the degree of the numerator is 1 more than the degree of the denominator, then you divide the two to get the equation for the asymptote but that doesnt seem possible here
also what even is the degree of ln(x)?
i dont really understand why that method works either so it would be great if somebody could explain that to me đ„Č
do you know about derivatives?
yes
what's the derivative of x/ln(x)?
(lnx - 1)/(lnx)^2
uhhhhhhh
well when x is large, the -1 in the num is negligible, so your function just looks like
ln(x) / ln^2(x)
which is
1/ln(x)
what does that do as x->infinity?
is that like 1/infinity???
yes, in the limit
is it 0??
yes
ok
so if there is an asymptote, its slope is gonna be zero
now you need to check if there actually is an asymptote
how do you do that
well an asymptote with slope zero is horizontal, yes?
oh wait so not a slant
and if a function is going to have a horizontal asymptote, then it needs to have a limit as x->infinity
so check if your function does
so those two facts combined:
- function goes to infinity as x->infinity
- function's slope goes to zero as x->infinity
means that there can't be an asymptote
btw, f(x) = ln(x) is another function with the same two properties
ohhhhh
so like
it goes to infinity instead of approaching another line
as x goes to infinity
so no asymptote
and cus slope is 0
right
ok
that makes sense
arguing in words, if there's an asymptote it has to be horizontal, but this function grows past any candidate horizontal line
Closed by @sly spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What have you tried
my first try with nothing to go on
its wrong af
book answer is h != 2, but i have no idea how to derive that.
this is literally first section of first chapter in the book, what does it mean when a column is a scalar of another?
Scalar multiple
It means column 2 is column 1, but just multiplied by a constant
In this case, if h=2 then column 2 is column 1 times 2
okay, which would mean we only have one line/equation?
when h = 2, both rows become scalar multiples as well, right?
oh no, third column doesnt
alright, so we would have a scalar multiple of another column if h=2, but how does that help us determine possible values?
this would create an inconsistent system because the columns would be scalar multiples but the rows would not be scalar multiples?
so the approach here is to find what would invalidate the system. since 2 would create a scalar multiple of column 1 but not column 3 then it would be inconsistent. how can we prove that 2 is the only value that would produce an inconsistent system?
was able to find it by algebra
.close
Closed by @hot bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Here is my work for all 3 of them
I think I got 1 and 2 right but im not sure about the third one
can anyone oversee if my work is correct? or where i made a mistake
nevermind the first power set, I understand that it is R=1 (-1,1) now.
<@&286206848099549185>
only need help on the second and third power series (which are labeled 9 and 10 on the screenshots)
@fresh nebula Has your question been resolved?
@fresh nebula Has your question been resolved?
pls
firstly, i found this site is helping me to check.
https://byjus.com/maths/radius-of-convergence/
secondly, you just have to consider R=radius of convergence,
so for 9), you can just state R=1
oh wait, haha i misread, you also need the interval
so, you're right for (9)
checking (10) now
