#help-0
1 messages · Page 286 of 1
.close
Closed by @rain birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone walk me step through step on how to do difference quotients with f(x)=2/x
@wide marlin Has your question been resolved?
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$$
LUNA
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\frac{2}{x+h}-\frac{2}{x}}{h}$$
LUNA
Multiply both numerator and denominator by x(x+h)
To get rid of the little fractions
can you show me what you mean and how you got that
You have 2 little fractions in the numerator of the main fraction
yes
We want to get rid of them
ok
if you multiply both numerator and denominator by x(x+h), those fractions will be simplified
Look
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{x(x+h) \frac{2}{x+h}-x(x+h) \frac{2}{x}}{x(x+h)h}$$
LUNA
so what will it look like after multipliyed
Numerator, first term, x+h will cancel with x+h, x remains
Numerator, second term, x will cancel with x, (x+h) remains
ok
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{2x-2(x+h)}{x(x+h)h}$$
LUNA
ok but why do we also mutiply the denominator
Btw the difference quotient is just a bit different, it doesn't involve the limit as h goes to 0
idk, this is what i know :p
Simplify numerator
ok
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{2x-2x-2h}{x(x+h)h}$$
This is limit definition of derivative or whatever it's called
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{-2h}{x(x+h)h}$$
That's difference quotient, just limit def of derivative minus the limit part
yeah so basically im doing the limit of it, i thought they were looking for the derivative of the function xD
True!
LUNA
ok
$$\frac{-2}{x(x+h)}$$
LUNA
This right here is the difference quotient
Not the derivative
This is what they are looking for
ignore the f'(x) and the limit
so now what
i thought we were looking for the derivative
That's the answer!
oh nothing else
That is the difference quotient of your function
if you want the derivative of the function 2/x
you take the limit of the difference quotient as h approaches 0
$$f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{-2}{x(x+h)}$$
LUNA
LUNA
$$f'(x)=\frac{-2}{x²}$$
ok
LUNA
.
f(x)-f(a)/x-a
That's slope
how do I simplify mutiply both sides by x and a
Yeah
can you help me with this one
Just plug in x and a into the function divided by x - a
Then simplify
There's nothing more you can do
it says the answer is x^2+ax+a^2-2
Then you did something wrong
yea I did nvm
@wide marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wide marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I find the polynomials for f that satisfy the equation
f(f(x))=x^4-12x^2+30
can someone walk me through it and how to reverse the equation
take f^(-1) of both sides
can you show me it please
f^(-1)(f(f(x))=f^(-1)(x^4-12x^2+30)
ok now what
simplify
how
what is f-inverse of f(x)
no
yea
no I forgot
basically, instead of inputting a value of x, and getting an output, our inverse function takes an output, and tells you in the value of x that produces it
so for our y=5x example
yea
$y=5x$
Austin
$\frac{y}{5}=x$
Austin
oh ok
y/20
$f^{-1}(y)=\frac{y}{5}$
Austin
so
yea
what is $f^{-1}(f(x))$
Austin
yes
so now simplify the left hand side of this
so what is it
$f^{-1}(f(f(x)))=f^{-1}(x^4-12x^2+30)$
Austin
simplify the left hand side using what you just told me about f-inverse of f
fx?
use parenthesis
(fx)
....
idk then
idk what to do
stop guessing then
when have you ever seen (fx) ever in your life
clearly you are typing something wrong
think for 2 seconds about how to fix your typo
and then we can continue
I can tell
how would I be able to find what it is
and I'm not going to keep helping you if you don't participate in the learning process
I know
and I am teaching you how
but I would be able to better help you, if you would stop guessing
and actually think about what I am showing you
then what do you want me to do
Austin
the inverse of the function
which is equal to ?
x
Austin
equal to ?
a
Austin
axb+5
ok
the f-inverse cancels the f
now I will ask you again
what is
$f^{-1}(f(f(x)))$
Austin
f(x)
yes
ok now what
f(x)
Austin
ok
so
the polynomials that satisfy your equation
are the inverse of (x^4-12x^2+30)
so all that is left to do
ok
is find out what that is
how
if $y=x^4-12x^2+30$
Austin
what is $f^{-1}(x)$
Austin
same way we did it for $y=5x$
y/all of that
Austin
?
how did we find the inverse of y=5x
diving 5 by y
yea
so the goal is to solve for x
so take $y=x^4-12x^2+30$ and solve it for x in terms of y
Austin
no
the whole equation?
I'm not going to do the question for you
I've shown you what the process is up until this step
ok
now its your turn to try working some things out
well idk what to do
I told you that you need to solve for x in terms of y
and you haven't tried anything yet
so go and try some stuff
it is okay if you don't get it right immediately
try again
im not sure where to start
well then now is the time that you can guess some things
so take your paper
and just start guessing
try something
see if it works
if it doesn't
try something new
you only tried for 2 minutes
do I set it to 0
no, you solve for x in terms of y
idk what that means
no
what is the answer
Closed by @wide marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me find where i went wrong calculating determinant
supposedly it is 24
i row reduced so i could use cofactor expansion along column 1, then used cofactor expansion again along row 2
disregard its supposed to be 3(-12-8)
as im still wrong
you need a - on the 3 on the second cofactor expansion
remember to alternate + and - signs
stupid
yeah
will that fix it anyways?
i dont think so
i now have 60
a bit off 24 lol
i mustve row reduced incorrectly?
yup
row 4 is wrong
-6 should be 0
making 24
nice
thanks for the reminder on that sign
@junior warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @junior warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
to prove each of these, do i just perform a left and right side check?
using the criteria for the space; x1+x3=x4, x2=0?
so just notation wise, would doing it like this be correct?
i am just a little lost on show to actually show it meets this criteria
hmm what's S?
actually what is S 😭
you can just start with two arbitrary vectors in the set V
you know x_2 =0, so just write that in immediately
there isn't a transformation being applied here
true
to show a vector space is a subspace, you only need to verify closure under vector addition and scalar multiplication
and 0 right
so take two arbitrary vectors in the space, add them, and show the result is in the space
yes, the space needs the zero vecor
oh i can just choose 2 random examples?
technically that's covered under scalar multiplication
i dont have to prove generally?
by arbitrary I mean general vectors
as in [a,0,b,a+b]
right
i am just trying to remember it was written something like this whenever i saw it
but not exactly like this, since S makes no sense lol
that's to show a transformation S is a linear transformation
yes, U + W in V for all U, W in V
and kU in V for all U in V and k in the base field
for example we were just told to show S(v+w)=S(v)+S(w)
so that is i guess where S comes from?
yeah, that's for verifying transformations S are linear
here you're just adding two vectors together
you're not showing the vector is equal to anything
you're showing it lies in V
oh wait
yeah
wow
im so lost
yes ok following now
this isnt a transformation
take [a,0,b,a+b] and [c,0,d,c+d]
add them together
show that the result follows the constraints required to be in V
if v and w are in the set, and if k is a scalar from the base field yes
ok i see
so would this be better
I would bracket out the terms to show what you're doing more clearly, but yes
ok
was just trying to get the general idea in
but yeah statements and better formatting ofc
[(v1+w2) + (v3+w3) = x1 + x3, for example]
i was speedrunning it
or x,y, u,v (o.e.) for pairs
but i agree
ok this cleared up this question i was confusing it with transformations i think because they have similar criteria?
anyways tysm
hi i need help, am i interrupting?
Closed by @junior warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait whats the bot command for that
the thing that makes the bot say "please read #❓how-to-get-help "
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Here’s my attempt
i know that the essence (or origin) of integral is the Riemann sum
in turn, by transforming the given "Sn" in the question into the form of integral
we will be able to get the answer
yet, i dont know how to do it
however, the book do give some useful advice, which is to express the k/n in f(k) as x
and then we can transform the Riemann sum into the integral from 0 to 1 of (1+x)^4
but whats the point of expressing the k/n in f(k) as x?
.close
Closed by @cinder sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\mapsto$ vs $\to$ whats the difference?
TheWhiteShadow
The first one means f(a) = b
The second one means the domain of f is A and the codomain is B
so i cant use $\mapsto$ for domain and vice versa?
TheWhiteShadow
Yeah
Closed by @flat vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this with normal highschool level math?
I just ran it through a cas and it says no elementary integral
Coz they use t sub
i mean its normal where theres a combination of x and trig functions to have no antideriv
if its just constants and trig you can get away with half angle
Did you try run it through wolfram
,w integral (x*cos(x)+sin(x))/(x^2+sin^2(x)) dx
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
😭
@hollow lark Has your question been resolved?
Yea lol they use complex numbers on integral calc
Closed by @hollow lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
never seen the use of contour integrals in hs calc
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this mean?
y | y
more context?
Set builder notation
just means "such that"
Can be read "for y such that"
thanks so much
you might also use the colon, : (which is more common)
.close
Closed by @molten oak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
instead of |
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
@cedar juniper Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Have you checked what you get if you put the last equation into a calculator and compare to what you are suppsed to get? 🙂
I get two answers
Each of them with a + - cuz of the root
How do i prove that its the ans they want?
Cookie
Yea but theres a +- before 63
And a +- outside the root
how do I prove that it will be + inside and + outside
@cedar juniper Has your question been resolved?
hi , can someone say if there is an error ?
Whats the problem???
.
.
Cos (A - B / 2)
ik but u still need to find cos(a-B)
and ik u did that
and I have calcualte the correct answer
why 65 +/- 63
u should add them
65 + 63
and u will get 128/65/2
that is 64/65
simplify the numerator
then u get the answer
problem solved
@cedar juniper
Theres no gurantee cos b and sin a are positive
but the answer need u to do that
or u right two answers like: 1 or 2 (rejected)
someth'in like that
@cedar juniper Has your question been resolved?
do one thing
u can use regular trignometric identites
cos beta value is know
consider beta to be some 2theta cos2theta=2cos square theta-1
then resubstitute value where theta is half beta
to same with sin alpha
then it can be soled
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how the integration formula is gotten from the differentiation formula?
The antiderivative is defined as the inverse operation of the derivative
If you want to know how that relates to area under the curve then it's a different story
What is “the integration formula” and “the differentiation formula?”
nah i just wantt o know how differentiation formula is turned into integration
like how its divided by 1/n+1 or something
idk
well you just try stuff out, and make a list of basic integration formulas, with which you find the integration of other complex functions.
eg: why is the integration of cosx sinx? Because if you differentiate sin(x) you get cos(x). With some elementary derivatives you can get the "basic" list
so integration formula doesnt root from differentiation formula?
yes it is based off of differentiation formulas as i said
is it very complicated to understand how it is based off of them?
didnt realise that typo being there for the past 10 mins lmao 💀
I guess you are reffering to integral of $x^n$.
since $\frac{d}{dx}x^{n}=nx^{n-1}$ and integrals are opposite of derivatives, you can say that $x^{n} + c=\int nx^{n-1}$. If you divide both sides by n, you get $\frac{x^{n}}{n}+c=\int x^{n-1}$ and when you finally substitute $u=n-1$, you get $\frac{x^{u+1}}{u+1}+c=\int x^{u}$
EmilyIsAlwaysRight
This is how most integration rules are derived. U take some differentiation rule, integrate both sides and keep manipulating it until you reach some nice-looking integration rule
Closed by @buoyant linden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We also know that the area of the water surface A = pi*(20h-h^2). When h = 12, there's a small change of h by p%, by using differentiation, how do I find the small change of A in terms of p and pi?
take log and differentiate.
dh/h = p/100
da/A = ( 20-2h)/(20h-h^2) *dh
wdym take log?
I don't understand
Take the natural log on both sides
because based on my understanding to find delta A, we'll have to do limit delta h approaching p, delta A/delta h
while delta A = f(h + delta h) - f(h)
yeah well since it's a very small change i told to differentiate
it's an approximation basically
yep I know
before approximating anything you have to understand it first
so I'm going down the path of understanding it, rather than being able to solve it
And since you are given dh/h you would want to take the natural log on both sides and differentiating both sides, to recover dh/h
what does it mean by dh/h?
fractional change
which value is dh/h here?
ye
small fractional change
well just think of what it means when some quantity increases by some percentage
right, so based on my understanding, small change in h by p% means dh = p%
suppose a price increases by 10%
final price - initial price / initial price = 10/100
yep
yep so of height increases by p%
final height - initial height / initial height = p/100
final height - initial height = ∆h and for very small quantities it's dh
so dh/h
ohhhh so dh/h = p/100
let me write it down
so dh/h = p% = p/100
makes sense
so whats the next step?
because we want to find dA
<@&286206848099549185>
here
since you took the log and differentiated
because we're finding the percentage again?
what log?
i dont see any log()
i know dA/dh = pi(20-2h)
yeah now multiply by h both sides
but to turn dA/dh into dA shouldn't i multiply dh rather than h?
or do Da = pi (20-2h) * dh
ah yep
so dh = (p*h)/100
same thing basically
so dA = pi(20-2h) * (p*h)/100
Ye
Closed by @obsidian cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does t-mT become t
not sure what you’re asking, but they’re performing a change of variables with m = n - 1
as n runs from -inf to inf, so does n - 1
hm ok
oh so as long as n remains it doesnt matter what is added or subtracted
still is periodic?
what is periodic?
for g to be periodic with period T, you need to show g(t) = g(t + T) for all t
Closed by @muted relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that (\sqrt{5}) is irrational.
scholablade
\section{7.6}
Suppose that (p) is a prime number.
\section{Lemma}
Let (a), (b) and (c) be integers, and let (p) be a prime. \
(i) If (p - a), then (gcd(p, a) = 1). \
(ii) If (a | bc) and (gcd(a, b) = 1), then (a | c). \
(iii) If (p | bc), then (p | b) or (p | c) (or both). \
\subsection{(a) Prove that (\sqrt{5}) is irrational.}
Assume for the sake of contradiction that (\sqrt{5}) is rational, then there must be some postive integers (a) and (b) where (\sqrt{5} = \frac{a}{b}) and assume that the previous fraction was written in lowest terms with no common divisors then we can do (\sqrt{5}a = b) and squaring gives us (5a^2 = b^2), since (b^2 \in \mathbb{Z}), this means that (5 | b^2) thereby (5 | b) by lemma (iii) so we can safely say that (b = 5k) and k is a positive integer, subsituting gives us (5a^2 = b^2) to (5a^2 = (5k)^2) to (5a^2 = 25k^2) to (\frac{a^2}{5} = k^2) and since (5 | a^2) or (5 | q) by lemma (iii) we can say this is a contradiction because we have said before that (a) and (b) have no common factors yet (5) divides the both of them therefore (sqrt{5}) is irrational.
scholablade
Then what's your question?
this is correct
agree
u alr prove???
I wanted to see if it was correct
ys when u proofed that sqrt 5 is irrational, then you're correct
trust yourself
and the power of math 😉
Still, am a beginner though and these are not proved by a computer
oh lol
Thanks for the confidence boost though
np
Closed by @still sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Cartesian writing of the complex (1 + 𝑖)^15.
can you help me ?
Yes
do you know the binomial theorem
Polar form would be easier I think
yes
What is the modulus of 1+i?
What is the argument of 1+i?
you could use it here, or use polar form
modulus : sqrt(2)
arg = pi/4
is that right ?
Yes
This channel is occupied.
I know but I really need help
What happens to the modulus and to the argument when you multiply two numbers?
There are free help channels, ask there.
What happens to the modulus and to the argument when you multiply two numbers?
I don't really know
When two numbers multiply the modulus are multiplied and the arguments are added
You have to multipliy the modulus and sum the arguments
okay
So in this case you multiply (1+i) with itself 15 times
What is the modulus of (1+i)¹⁵?
What is an argument of (1+i)¹⁵?
.close
Closed by @trim aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i want to ask question about 0/0 = undefined/unlimited?
0/0 is undefined
ohh
Whatever unlimited may mean
but btw is there any unlimited answer in math other than functional question
What do you mean by "unlimited" then?
Unlimited as in "we can't take the limit of this at 0" ?
Like $\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{x}{|x|}$?
rafilou2003
No 6(the value of tan(cos‐1(-1)) = cosec 180
E undefined
The ans D or E
yeah, I'm just curious about 0/0 too
but cosec 180 in sin cos tan table is ∞
sure, if you don't care about the sign
But if you do, there is a difference between +∞ and -∞
um is the real value of cosec 180 is +∞?
oh it doesn't mean unlimited but it's just a "sign"?
alright thanks for the time and the explanation
.close
Closed by @undone cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I recall being taught in school that a decimal like 24.445 would round (to the tenths) to 24.5 (24.445 -> 24.45 -> 24.5), but I've seen else where that it would round to 24.4 (24.445 -> 24.4). What is the discrepancy?
I would not ever round 24.445 to 24.5
the procedure you describe is a good example of how rounding errors can start to pile up
when rounding, you're trying to drop some of the significant digits while keeping as much information as possible; you want to round to the closest number possible
you can see that 24.445 is closer to 24.4 than 24.5
so the second way is more accurate, in that, you end up with a closer result with the same number of digits retained
Gotcha, thanks a bunch. I can't believe I didn't notice such a basic fundamental issue sooner...
.close
Closed by @slate acorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
knowing that w=e^2iπ/5. I calculated that w^5 = 1. And now I have to deduce that 1 + 𝑤 + 𝑤^2 + 𝑤^3 + 𝑤^4 = 0
how can I proceed ?
factor the polynomial z^5-1, then use the fact that w satisfies the polynomial
You can draw it
You get a pentagon to the origin
in your last question you asked me what was (1-z)(1+z+...+z^(n-1))
this might be related ;)
Closed by @trim aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @trim aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is it possible to have 4sin(x)=x
wdym
Why do you think it's impossible?
because 1 constant would just equal another
lets say x=2
4sin(2) = 3.6
x=2
3.6=/=2
Okay? That doesn't mean 4sinx = x has no solutions
I might as well prove that x^2 - x = 0 never happens
that just means that x=2 is not a solution of that equation
Try x = 0
that works
could the graph of 4sinx-x also be investigated?
In what sense "investigated"?
like would you get the same exact solutions with it
It has the roots at the same x-coords
So yeah
Now try picking a nonzero number x such that 4sinx and x are close to each other
I don't think they are asking you to approximate 0
It's not supposed to be neither
That shouldn't really be a problem in this case, just start by calculating x_2
so if it isnt a solution, I should just skip it?
do you know what newton's method is...
i dont think so, because 4sin(x)-x isnt a function like f(x)
f is a function
any function? what is newtons method trying to do?
linear approximation but like really accurately if needed
linear approximation of what
of a function
the point of Newton's method is to find roots of a function, inputs that result in an output of 0
<@&268886789983436800>
Also -2.47.. because it's an odd function
oh yes, true
well the function would be f(x) = 4sinx - x
mk
so if you input x_1
hooly shit
i just got the derivative wrong bruh
im just being a dumbass
thanks
.close
Closed by @bright remnant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please explain how to do this? im kind of lost on this unit...
please ping me when available, thanks!
what you really need to undertand man?
i missed this whole unit so if someone could answer them for me and explain how they got it
@solar trail Has your question been resolved?
let’s start with total distance travelled. this is just adding up numbers so find how much distance they cover in each line (A, B, C, and D) and add that up
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
to solve the differential equation they have got this answer. I used auxillary equation and got sqrt(-1) which doesn't make sense
Mr. Gamer
I used auxillary equation and got sqrt(-1) which doesn't make sense
were you not taught complex numbers?
can you write this in terms of real functions?
you could use laplace transform
no need. and there's also no initial values so the algebra is gonna get really messy
its not part of the syllabus
.close
Closed by @hasty flax
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Mr. Gamer
i suggest you read up on it
diffeqs without complex numbers 
i wonder if it is possible to intuitively solve without straight up guessing without invoking complex numbers or transformations
you could probably just make it exact i think
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do augmented matrixes actually work
gonna need to be more specific....
I understand how to do them, but I keep placing the numbers wrong. The site for school I'm using tells me I'm wrong and shows the correct answer, but not what I'm doing wrong
you're variables are associated to a column, all coefficients of that variable should be in that column.
so you'r columns are [x y z | constant]
but look at your last row. The x coefficient isn't there, and the z coefficient is in the y column
oh
I didn't even know that the columns were supposed to be specific
the lesson just released today for my class
once you have it in this form, the idea is just to copy the coefficients directly into the matrix in the position they're in.
blank spaces become 0's
thank you so much man
I spent 2 hours sitting here frustrated with myself for getting the number placements wrong
literally the first question I've got right
good job!
linear algebra is weird, it's not hard, but it's easy to make simple mistakes that throw everything off.
take your time and be patient, it'll get easier
@tawdry steeple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tawdry steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
with what
wym "finally"? it's only been 2 minutes
im typing
also you should BEGIN by posting your question not just go "HELP!!!"
confusing
What does this mean
@alpine sable please do not flood the chat
commutative numbers
... are those x's supposed to mean multiplication?
yes
Ann
yes
also there's no such thing as a "commutative number" -- you must be mixing up some terminology.
but anyway
have you made any progress? Y/N
no wrong asociative numbers
home work
there's also no such thing as an "associative number".
also let me restate my question:
have you made any progress? Y/N
y
ok, show your progress thus far.
maybe by taking a picture of it and sending it here.
pls ignore background 
wait, -20?
@vale wigeon
-20
why'd you not write the minus earlier...
but ok yes so far so good
now perhaps only one step remains: to calculate 45 * (-100)
are you able to do that
nope
why not? do you know how to multiply numbers in general?
how old are you?
13
yessss
ok then what is stopping you in 45 * (-100)?
you didn't answer my question.
if the reality was "nothing is stopping me, i worked it out just now" then you should've also said that.
yes i can do it
tahnk you
strange how you said just a few minutes ago that you couldn't, but whatever.
ok so that's like ten problems you've sent a photo of here.
next number💀

lemme take my pen
there's like ten problems here, which one do you want help with now
in school i dont get it
...
lets start one by one
ok look. when people ask you questions,
it is polite to give them DIRECT and TO-THE-POINT answers.
answer it
it is NOT polite to answer with things that don't have anything to do with the question.
also we won't do your homework for you.
umm sorry
it is your responsibility to tell us exactly where you are stuck and exactly which problem you want us to look at.
im sick yesterday so i dont get it can you explain it
i didnt come to school
ok, so we're talking about these problems, yes?
uhm um
does "uhm um" mean "yes" or "no"?
yes
right, ok.
just like in your previous problem, in all of these problems you are applying the associative law.
yes
in that case it was the associative law for multiplication, in these there's also the associative law for addition.
but the principle is the same
applying the associative law means switching up the order in which you do the addition with three numbers involved -- do you begin by adding the middle and last number, or by the first and middle number?
the associative law says you'll get the same result either way,
and in these problems they have you change it up so you add the more convenient pair of numbers first.
it only can applied on multiplication and subtraction
multiplication and addition.
a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
and
a * (b * c) = (a * b) * c
the numbers do not change themselves or switch around, only the brackets swap places.
was this the explanation you wanted?
front and back
ohhhhh i get it thank you very much👌
ok
do you have anything else to ask?
if not, you can type .close to close this channel.
@unkempt flax Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wow nice which part?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm curious why dy/dx gives the rate of change of y in respect to x, isn't dy/dx supposed to be finding the equation to find the value tangent at any given point?
you just made a discovery!
its how much y changes with a little nudge to x
the slope of the tangent is the rate of change
oh, so it should be limit dx->some_little_nudge dy/dx
but since some_little_nudge is too small to be significant
we just assume it's 0?
its not really 0
it's close to 0
yes
what do you mean?
wait so the whole point of dy/dx is to find the rate of change?
You say dy/dx is the rate of change and the slope of the tangent
well the whole point of calculus is instanteous rate of change
*differential
took me about a year to realize that 
calc teachers are infamously bad at teaching
mine gives 10 pages of homework and scrolls the phone in class :/
i didn't understand shit until i taught it to someone else
khan academy is really good for the intuition
I was lucky to have a teacher who actually taught
I'm currently self-learning this Precalculus with Calculus Previews
because I find that I have 0 basics and I only memorise formulas
which to me is horrible
is that a textbook?
*I've been fed formulas and how to use them to be exact
yep