#help-0
1 messages · Page 285 of 1
✅
that will be simpler
how did you get 1/n
its correct
termwise ues
1/n is not
but not the whole sum
Okay what do I change here
1/n should be that
ok i get it
find a bound for each term, then sum and get the bound for the sum
Ohh okie I’ll try
Wait is it just 1 then?
But I forgot to multiply this by n later
So that gave 1
yes thats correct
i have a doubt
yes?
💀💀😭 for me this entire question is a doubt
shdnt it be n²/n²+1 and n²/n²+n? or im i missing smthn?
but theres no 1/n, it starts from n/n²+1
Like this?
you have to find something thats greater than that sum
yes
and its limit is same as the first one you found
Which one would be better for this question? And how do I figure that out
then summing lets you apply the squeeze theorem
Is the limit just 1? 😭
yes
Okay I’ll try both
I’m not closing this channel yet in case I get stuck
Thank you very much yall for ur help
@hidden widget Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i have 2 quesitons 🗣️🗣️
- what the hell is a solution, i don’t get this at all
- confused ab how to find x
help please 😜😜
integration?
i have no idea
I guess
Help I am stuck 😭
they want you to check if the coords of the point satisfy equation of the line
bro this is my channel thing 😭😭
a solution here means the point is on the line
if so, then it's called "a solution"
X solution is when you plug it in all the equations are true
ohh?
okay
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
do i grab any random number for x?
how do you interpret the pair of numbers?
so u plug in for (x, y)
what does (0, 2) mean
yea
so when they give you an equation like y=3x+2
on this line is every point where the equality is true
1 answer is 10
Boy a bumbo
#❓how-to-get-help , I'll help you
oh my god
okay if i tell you that (0,0) is a solution you can check
you plug in x=0 and y=0 into the equation
and youll get 0 = 3*0 + 2
or 0 = 2
@outer palm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please answer me, Im learning sin cos tan and im really confused
So the sin for A also known as Sin A = Opp/Hyp which in this case would be 16.28/17=0.95 (b=17). Say we had to find b however, we would use Sin 65.56 = 16.28/b and find b correct but what confuses me is that Sin A is not equal to Sin 65.56. Please help asap
better pic
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
You can apply those rules only in a right angled triangle. You can't apply them on a random triangle. At least not trivially, there's more nuance to that.
oh.
ok so can u help with this question
What do you need to find?
I know I have to do Sin B * (a/Sin A), but I would appreciate a much more detailed explanation
not exactly
I understand its a rule or theorem or smth
a = 12
Sin A = a/c
How would u find c
This is not true.
As i said, those ratio formulas are only applicable in a right-angled triangle.
You can't use them for any triangle.
OH THE WHOLE DAM SIN THING ONLY WORKS IN RIGHT TRIANGLES
I SEE
how would I calculate Sin A then
could you explain that
It works in others as well. Just not that simply. As i said, there's a bit more nuiance to that.
You are given the angle A.
Use a calculator to find sin(69°).
oh so the Opp/Hyp is invalid for non right triangles
Yes
answer is 7.56
how
maybe cuz i round decimals
thanks
i was really confused
btw whats ur elo
in chess
@echo scroll Has your question been resolved?
I have a different question, for this question, I would have a/ Sin A = b/ Sin B. Since we are trying to solve for the angle of B, the way I believe we solve since is solve for Sin B and find the angle measurement from there. By doing this we get (Sin B) = (Sin A)b/a
nvm I forgot to do the inverse of sin
@echo scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @echo scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
How do I put "9 is added to one-fifth of d" in math expression"
Would it be 9+ 1/5d
yeah
I'm not so sure that's why. Thanks
as long as the d isnt in the denominator there
So it's not d/5
Oh it's the same thing 💀forgot mate
just in case you were meaning that
np
Closed by @fierce pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
remember that $[\mathbf{x}]_B=\mathbf{B}^{-1}\mathbf{x}$, where $\mathbf{B}$ is the matrix $\begin{bmatrix}\mathbf{b}_1&\mathbf{b}_2\end{bmatrix}$
qianqian07
@craggy crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
maybe not since ln(10) is more like 2.3
yes it shouldn't matter
if you're dividing cm by cm, same as dividing mm by mm
so you should have 12/(ln(10) - ln(1.5)) * (ln(x) - ln(1.5))
OH I KNOW
since you're doing in CM instead of MM
your answer x will be in cm
whereas your correction will give x in mm
yes
Your formula for V(x) is correct if you input x in cm
Because their formula for V(x) is correct if you input x in mm
np
Closed by @cloud fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
If we assign a value of X as cardinal, and its values within the set, saying that X= infinity. What exactly happens to the set if we put it in such notation;
If |X| = Inf, what happens to the set? Are we just measuring size, can I give specific values within the set X specificity to solve for some value within it?
<@&286206848099549185>
I’m pretty sure that infinity isn’t a cardinal, cardinal would be like the aleph numbers, countable, uncountable infinites etc
And I guess all finite cardinals
Also I’m not so sure what you are even asking
if so then Cardinal must also be infinity
If a set is infinite then there are elements so you could find elements in the set
Yes I can set it as an infinte, though I'm trying to solve within the set X, that there exists F which satisfies Y, in which Y =F+1 and F=Y-1 and both are within the set X, but F must have an infinite set before it for it satisfy Y.
Wait would F and Y be cardinal numbers?
Do you have an actual problem statement
Like from a textbook or a problem set?
Cause I’m very confused by what you’re writing tbh
I've written out the problem,
I also rewrote it;
There is an infinite Setof opening doors from a first door (We assign this series as a Set of |X| = N ~ or X ={n+1}::
There exists a door Y within the set of X; And for Y to open the previous door must be opened.::
We then label the door before the set Y, as the set F. |F| = {Y-1}::
For door F and Y there exists an infinite set of doors opening before them (I disagree with this point as you have to validate that this is the case but I digress::
If you start from the beginning of X; it then exists that F and Y cannot be satisfied or exist within this set as it is supposed that an infinite number of doors is needed to satisfy this condition.
If Y is an "original" or "current" number (so that it is different or from all numbers within X and isn't F) within the infinite set of X; And that F ⊃ Y; and that there is an assumed previous event before Y;;then;; Y cannot be satisfied without F and the infinite set isn't possible*?
Conclusion::
Y cannot satisfy the previous event of F; As F is an infinite series before Y; and therefore Y cannot exist, so that the infinite set of F before Y is not possible as F needs to satify an infinity number of open doors?
well there are an infinite number of numbers, is there any Arithmetic Progression? cause an infinite number of relations can be drawn out
Why did you rewrite it? Is it not in English?
Just such the set X is being constantly opened, and I put that as X=n+1; can I just use bijection to solve?
It's solving for a paradox of an assumed infinite regression for F,
P1: There is an infinite hallway with an infinite number of doors, each labeled sequentially.
P2: For 'Door Y' to be opened, all the doors before it, in the sequence must be opened.
P3: 'Door F' precedes 'Door Y' within this infinite sequence.
P4: To reach 'Door F', one would need to open an infinite number of doors.
P5: If one were to attempt to open the doors sequentially starting from the first door, 'Door F' and consequently 'Door Y', would never be reached, as there are an infinite number of doors to open before them.
P6: If 'Door Y' represents a current event, and all preceding doors represent prior causes or events, 'Door Y' can never be reached if there's an infinite regress of causes or events.
C: The existence or occurrence of 'Door Y' contradicts the idea of an infinite regress in a causal sequence, making the infinite regress infeasible.
We need to solve that Y can exist without F being satisfied.
So you’re trying to prove that there are only finitely many doors before Y?
either that or, you don't need F to satisfy Y.
As it's within the set X, besides P4 causing this problem
I just woke up from sleep, and it's 4 am here, I have to be a little fresh, then I will see the problem again
I've been on this problem for a while 💀
Don't worry
Well from what I can see, isn’t it enough to simply map the doors from the first door to Y onto a finite subset of the natural numbers
And can’t you do that by defining a linear order on X with the first door as the Least element and then a door is less than another if it is opened before that door
It seems to me that in this way you already have shown that any door has only a finite sequence of doors before it
It would seem that way, though I'm having trouble with actaully writing it out.
I've set X=n+1, n+2, n+3 . . .
and F = Y(X) - 1 ~ F = Y-1
and Y = F(X) + 1 ~ Y = F+1
We can biject Y and F onto the set of X so that they can satisfy themselves?
@barren bolt
Or that Y exists within a finite set of X, and can be satisfied as stated for having a finite number of X before Y
If you can define a well order on the set X then there is a theorem that relies of the axiom to dependant choice which states that any strictly decreasing sequence of elements must terminate after a finite number of steps
So if you can define that well order then that would be enough as far as I’m concerned
alrty, just gotta find the proper notation for it xD @barren bolt thanks
I think it can be defined by x<y if y is open implies x is open
Then I guess prove that this relation is a well order on the set X
we wouldn't need to satisfy F -> Y because F is = to X in the sequence. So that F and Y can be solved as that instead of the original problems notation
Ok but isn’t F before Y?
If F is equal to X then how can F be a door contained in X?
Also how could there be an element behind it Y which is also open
I’m very confused by your notation tbh
I agree that F and Y are sets as all numbers are sets, but as far as I understand F and Y are both in X
So why would F equal X?
I don’t know what you mean
Also isn’t X infinite? So why would X=n+1?
I may be forgetting another variable, as X is the set of opening doors. But maybe I could've put X = Inf and the sequence of opening doors is Z = x+1?
I thought X is the set of all doors in this sequence
And Y is just any door and F the door preceding Y
So what is Z?
Also you’re trying to prove that the set of all doors preceding Y is finite, no?
Wouldn't we need to differentiate from open and closed doors?
We can put the value of X = Inf
And Z = X + 1
Then Z can be differentiated from X?
yes I am
So X is all the opened doors and Z is X union one door that is closed?
Z is the opening door(s)
X is the set of doors (closed or not changed)
I think I almost got it;
Ok but then Z should be a subset of X
so why is it X+1 as you put it
I assume you’re in a university class?
Because we need to put an event of opening doors as such, so that there is an event that be satisfied for F.
I mean we could just put this all over X and call it a day
ye
Is this a foundations/set theory course?
ye
Did your prof give this problem in an assignment? If so can I read the problem verbatim?
When you say stuff like X=inf then Z=X+1 it confuses me
I’m assuming that you are talking about the cardinalities and not the sets
This was copied directly from your prof?
no I rewrote it
Ok
from this
also no sorry I misread what you stated, I'm not in a course atm
Oh ok just using a textbook or smth?
but It's a problem I'm trying to solve 😭
Or did you come up with this situation
I've been using wiki 💀
It was a paradox presented by someone, and I'm trying to solve it.
I almost, accidently put X as a series lolol
The original is with the P1, P2, etc?
mhm
So in fact the paradox assumes that there are infinitely many doors before Y
So all we can prove or disprove here is that this paradox is logically consistent
Also another thing I notice is that the paradox talks about physically opening the doors
And that being a reason we cannot reach Y
You are trying to show that F can be open without Y being open? But that is a contradiction to the premises 2 and 3
So I’d say you cannot prove that
So what is the purpose of this paradox? Are they trying to argue that infinite regress isn’t possible
Or that it is?
infinite regress isn't possible;
Ok well I agree with that
In fact infinite regress is used to prove things by contradiction
Like if you can demonstrate that an infinite regress exists due to an assumption then you can usually reject that premise
You keep saying this but I’m confused what you mean
It’s not like Y is a number unless you consider the position of it in the sequence to be it’s number
And if so, you know from P4 that Y is infinite
P4 says that you need to open infinitely many doors to reach F and then to reach Y you need to open F
mfw infinites in infinites
F verifies Y, and F is needed an infinite of X to verify itself. therefore F and Y doesn't exist.
This argument seems very strange all around, like are P5 and P6 major premises that are derived from P1-P4 or are they just to be taken for granted
P5 and P6 and even P4 to an extent seem strange to me
Because P4 assumes that F is infinitely far along
And then P5 assumes that someone is physically going to open each door???
And P6 sounds like this is all supposed to be some strange analogy
And then the C is just that infinite regresses cannot occur???
I’m sorry for wasting your time but I don’t think I can help, I barely can understand what you are trying to prove
@clear minnow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @clear minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
It's alr, I'm not sure either
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you remember what condition is required for a series to converge?
no
@bronze knoll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone please clarify to me about taylor series
Why does |x| < 1?
wouldn't it still be valid for x to be any value?
The statement "|x| < 1" specifies that the absolute value of a variable x is less than 1. This means that x can take on any value between -1 and 1, excluding -1 and 1 themselves
why is this true?
so the reason why this is true is based on the definition of absolute value. The absolute value of a number is its distance from zero on the number line. When we say "|x| < 1," we are saying that the distance of x from zero is less than 1 unit. Therefore, x can be any value within the interval (-1, 1), but it cannot be equal to -1 or 1.
idk if this make sense
@rich basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let S be set of positive rationals, with operation, a * b= 2ab. Does this form a group?
I verified closure, associativity, identity
i think the identity element is 1/2
is the inverse b=1/4a?
a * 1/2 = 2(a)(1/2) = a. Identity looks good!
a * 1/(4a) = 2(a)(1/(4a)) = 1/2 = e. Inverse looks good!
I can't remember if you need to specify that 0 can't be an element, but if you were to plug in 0 you'd get an undefined inverse. It's been a minute since I've done any of thise so verify that but your identity and inverse look good to me
@barren portal Has your question been resolved?
oh my b I didn't see the underlying set
yeah you're good to go then, nice work!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
3
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
why didnt you just add √(2x+3) to both sides and square
yes
you made a mistake 2nd line
its -8x
the -2 should have been squared roo
but this is a very inefficienr way to do it
the -2 that should have been squared would turn to positive 4 right?
why not do this though
yes
and rhs is (2-8x)^2 right
yea so just the -2 should have been +4 I did write the 8x in my note book and I got the answer right this way as well
thanks a lot
but you could have done this so much easier lol
doing this gives you 2 as well
Closed by @ebon torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help in learning/steps how it could be rearrange into this, thanks
that's kind of a weird thing they did, they solved for this particular x
Closed by @trail python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
2x+3y=-12
I have tried putting it in slope-intercept form and am not sure if I am write or wrong.
looks correct 👍
np
.close
Closed by @drowsy mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the values of m and b that make the following function differentiable.
Could anyone guide me through the question please?
Clearly, the function is already differentiable for any x other than 2, so we have to make sure that it is differentiable at x = 2
First of all, we would like the sided limits of f(x) to be equal there, right?
So, we set 4 = 2m + b
Oh does that mean function isnt differentiable if the x is 2?
No, depends on the value of m and b here
hmm okay
I just meant for x > 2 or x < 2, didn't want to exclude x = 2
oh i see
yeah this is probably the part i didnt get ;-;
cause I learned what limit is and what derivative is seperately
Can you imagine what the graph of the function would look like if the one-sided limits do not agree somewhere?
uhh.. im not sure about that
ohh i get it
And discontinuity implies that it's not differentiable there
yeah
That's why we want f(x) to be continuous at x = 2
So we set the one-sided limits equal to each other
(We would also need to make sure that those one-sided limits are equal to f(2), but here it's already taken care of)
Okay, so continuity at x = 2 happens when 4 = 2m + b
wait how did you get that 4 = 2m + b?
oh do I get it after setting the limits equal to each other?
Yeah
And just say $\lim_{x\to2^-}f(x) = \lim_{x\to2^-}x^2 = 4$ and $\lim_{x\to2^+}f(x) = \lim_{x\to2^+}mx+b=2m+b$
A Lonely Bean
Now, we need to make sure that the one-sided limits of f' also agree at x = 2, as it would imply differentiability at that point
The derivative of x^2 and mx + b are 2x and m respectively, right?
yeah derivative of x^2 is 2x but isn't the derivative of mx + b m?
Oh yeah I made a typo there my bad
oh okay
So we also set 2 * 2 = m
Meaning m = 4 and now we can solve for b as well
Using the first equation that we derived, we get b = -4
Here is what the graph of f looks like with these values of m and b
hmmm sorry... but I don't really get what is going on since this one
so what do i get from setting the limits equal?
Continuity
4, and 2m+b are the points that limits equal?
4 and 2m + b are the one-sided limits and we set them equal
oh so 4=2m+b
Yes
what do I do with this equation though?
That's just one linear equation in m and b, obviously it would be insufficient to solve for those unknowns, so we look for another condition that makes f(x) differentiable at x = 2
We made sure that the values of x^2 and mx + b are the same, now we need to make sure that their slopes also agree
ah i see
so since x^2 was 2x, derivate mx+b has to be the same?
mx + b differentiated* has to be the same, yeah
So 2x and m should be equal at x = 2
so it should be 2(2)=4 m=4?
Yes
Ohh so we got everything required m=4 and b=-4
Yeah
Closed by @somber coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
radius of the circle is 8
distance between the blue and green parallel lines is also 8
centre of circle lies on the blue line
why is the graph like this
like what? can you elaborate
shouldnt the circle be just touching the red and green lines
because its radius = distance between parallel lines
they're not vertical lines
the distance horizontally like you have in yellow there is 8, but usually when we talk about the distance between two lines we mean the shortest distance between them
and you could draw a shorter distance by moving perpendicular to the lines
if the green and red lines were just touching the circle, the shortest distance between the three lines would be 8
wait wasnt the formula of distance between parallel lines |c1-c2|
wait holy shit it is |c1-c2|/root a^2+b^2
bruh
the last 2 month
s
that'll work lol
Closed by @steel olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the primitive function of \(\abs{x^2\cos(x^3)}\), i.e., \(\int\abs{x^2\cos(x^3)}\dd x\).
So would i use the hybrid function definition of absolute value or write abs as sqrt(blah^2)
i'd use the defn of abs
so then i'd have to integrate x^2 cos x^3 and -x^2 cos x^3 ye?
yea
well
no
when is x^2 cos(x^3) > 0?
i mean yes you'll have to integrate both of those but how you sew them together is important
So i gotta find x^2 cos x^3 >= 0 and x^2 cos x^3 < 0 as per the definition
so x^2 cos x^3 >= 0 implies x^2 >= 0 or cos x^3 >= 0 right? or am i using the nonexistence of nontrivial zero divisors incorrectly, or partially incorrectly
yall gotta ping me
think about how you can multiply two things to get a positive number (but also think about what x^2 can be)
1/3 *3x^2 is the derivative of the composed function
@crimson carbon Has your question been resolved?
Mb back had to do some things
As in (-1)^3x^2cos(x^3)
@crimson carbon Has your question been resolved?
@crimson carbon Has your question been resolved?
To do the same for |2x|, you note -x^2 + A for x<0 and x^2 + B for x>0 work.
Now the key is to ensure the antiderivative works for the whole domain R is it needs to be differentiable at the join, with the correct derivative.
This one is relatively simple for |2x| as theres only 1 join
That's why identifying this is important
Youve got to identify the joins and then make them all work by using the correct constants of integration for each 'bit'
I see
@crimson carbon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crimson carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone know how to find the x and y intercept on a table in math isn’t it when x =0 whatever y is, is the intercept and vice versa
No, -2 * 0 + 2 is not equal to 4
So how to find the x intercept with a table
Look at the y value which is below the number 0 among the x values
Closed by @wispy trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Oh wait also if on the table there is no 0 say for x what calculation do I do to figure it out
For y intercept you simply take the equation, replace x with 0 and solve for y
And vice versa
For x intercept you replace y with 0 and solve for x
Closed by @wispy trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey there, can anyone explain how the answer to 5 is -12 VDC?
i thought it would be zero?
apologies for the scribble on the diagram, you can ignore that
also apologies if this is the wrong discord for this, cant find anywhere else
@hasty adder Has your question been resolved?
.gg/physics
oh thank you!
hello, i am very bad at prefixes
i do know the formula
f = 1/2pi/sqrt LC
$f = /frac{1}{2pi/sqrt{LC}}$
Pirate
$f = /frac{1}{2pi/sqrt(LC)}$
Pirate
turns out im bad at latex too lol
$f = \frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{LC}}$
orthogonal
ah yup
so i need to go back to basics
how would 20mH and 50uF convert into just hertz after the use of this formula
i do know the product of LC is in the power of -9
and by converting 1000 to 100 within the square root
i can reduce that power to -8 then take the square root of both 100 and 10^-8
actually ill send a photo of my work one second
i know it ends up becoming 500/pi
but i am confused how it becomes just hertz instead of kilo hertz
btw that bear is cute lol
you can confirm the hertz by the dimensions of L and C
can you elaborate on what that means
are you familiar with dimensions?
like
dimensional formula of velocity is $[LT^-1]$
Dissrupt
oh this is entirely new to me
oh
it is a different topic
oh i see
basically we break the quantities into basic or fundamental quantities
like mass, length, time, current
like velocity is displacement/time, and displacement is length basically
got it
so velocity is L/T
It is just a way of expressing and checking formulas
yup
gotcha gotcha
and forming formulas too
okay i see where i made the mistake also on my calculation
(without constants)
by converting 10^4 to 10000 it becomes a power of just 1
so basically hertz
not sure if that process of thinking is wrong tho
basically the product of units of self inductance and capacitance is time
s^-2 right
what?
idk that's what someone told me yesterday here in this discord
well the unit comes out of the root
and becomes t
so it must be t^2 inside the root
oh i see so it just becomes t
yeah
ooooh okay gotcha gotcha
this topic is alternating current right?
i hate that topic
yeah it's a lot to digest for sure
the book doesnt even explain how it got the answer
just tells you the answer and that's it
lol
no prob mate
@hasty adder Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hasty adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
In which base?
Message history
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know that there is a way to prove it with a diagram, but is there any way to prove it without a diagram?
u need to construct the diagram , even if there is no diagram given in the question , i guess so
AFAIK, no
As far as I know
which grade are u?
how do i approach this?
Is the law of our side, if I say ay?
nvm
that's fine
i think so at least
i am 10
yes give me a sec
isn't it , angle in a semi circle is 90 degrees
i am not sure about it even
wut
one sec
^
do you agree that angle ADC=angle ADB+angle BDC
sum of opposite angles in a circumscribed quadrilateral equals 180
yes
yes what is angle ADB? note that AB is a diameter
this also works of course
multiple ways to go about this
sorry i couldn't
wait but how find BDC
oh yeah similar triangles
because you split BAC
and BOC when bisected is equal to BAC
nice
@azure remnant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We also know that the surface area of the water A, is given by A = pi*(20h-h^2), so what is the rate of change of water surface area when h = 12 in terms of pi?
I've managed to calculate that dA/dh = pi*(20-2h)
so by right, substituting h as 12 into dA/dh will find me the correct answer
but the answer indicates that rather, dA/dh * 0.5 is correct, why?
ohhhhhh
you are given dH/dt
Closed by @obsidian cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure if my process is right
Don't I have to use the power rule for integrals
add 1 to the exponent and bring the exponent to the denominator?
I'm more concern with getting the inicial values correct
Where to plug in inicial velocity and incial position to solve for C
I see my mistake on the second part
just fixed it
Still concern if I'm plugging in the initial values for velocity and position correctly though
Have somebody here tried Kumon?
huh?
@naive ruin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have data with a relationship pattern between the dependent and independent variables like the following graph. what is the estimation method suitable for modeling it?
@cerulean thistle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cerulean thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me this?
Why does $\lim :_{x\to :\infty :}\left(sin\left(x\right)\right)$ diverges
while $\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{1}{sin\left(x\right)}\right)$ the limit of this does not exist?
LE SSERAFIM
diverge and limit does not exist are sometimes the same thing in some textbooks
some say "goes to infinity" to be more explicit than diverges, but this one isn't even the case
Ohhh so does that mean all sin, cos, tan functions diverges?
Ah okay, thank you!
nonconstant
constant functions are periodic
constant functions lol
alright thank you for the correction
Closed by @native cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If Thomas used $\frac{2}{3}$ on a smartphone, and $\frac{1}{5}$ on shoes, in terms of x, how much has Thomas used?
紅卫兵
that would be $\frac{2x}{3}+\frac{x}{5}$?
紅卫兵
or $$\frac{13x}{15}$$
紅卫兵
I don't understand the question
what would the expression of how much Thomas used if all of Thomas money = x
sorry if i phrased it a little weird
@wise dirge Has your question been resolved?
Yes, that's correct.
thank you
because my textbook said something else
.close
Closed by @wise dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
evaluate where a is constant. only use limits
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.close
Closed by @formal rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m not sure how to tackle this problem
@robust current Has your question been resolved?
@robust current Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @robust current
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Greetings
I'm not sure if this count as any type of mathematics although it is chemistry lmao. (Feel free to dismiss me if you must) but any help step-to-step would be appreciated here.
you're dismissed
Closed by @pearl ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
try the chem server in #old-network
✅
o
oh lmao
I'm sure someone can help with this here probably
Closed by @pearl ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea how to solve
you can start by setting up a system of equations, do you know how to do so?
Well, I tried to do 2J + 3S =225
And then 1J = Sx3
But I'm not sure how I would solve
I'm learning currently but I'm confused
ok np, have you heard of the substitution method?
2(Sx3) +3s = 225? And yes i have just not sure how I would apply
well that is one way, but alternatively, notice you can replace 3s with j
So 2J + J = 225? So 3J = 225? Meaning 225 / 3 is J?
yep, and what is 225/3?
75 so J = 75
yep, now what do you think you can do?
Divide 75 by 3 to get 25 which = S
perfect, great job 👍
I'm a little confused how we figured out S = 3J
Oh wait I see because it says in the equation. So how would I write the full algebraic equation?
you mean J=3S?
This equation yields that
From your setup
1J = J
S*3 = 3S
Therefore
J = 3S
So would I write 2J + 3S = 225 and then a separate equation that states J = 3S? I'm just wondering if there's a way to incorporate it into one equation
It would be called a system of equations
Equations being plural
You have multiple equations that are simultaneously true in a system
If i just said J = 3S alone there are infinite combinations to satisfy that expression
But then you say
In addition to that, I also require this other constriction:
2J + 3S = 225
In terms of how you write it a typical way is to use a big curly bracket
{
And then write each equation on top of each other
Okay I think it's starting to make sense to me, since we were given the value of 3S = J we then can derive that from total by dividing by 3
{ x + y = 2
{ x - y = 0
Looks vaguely like this on paper but 1 big curly bracket
Yea you were given additional information in the form of another true statement which you could bring into the first equation
You can have systems of 3 or more equations
Okay, that makes sense
So to clear it up,
2j+3s=225
3s=j
So 3j = 225
225 ÷ 3 = j
j÷3 = s
J=75
S=25
Yea that's it
Closed by @slow lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
have you made any progress?
I actually have to go now sorry
I'd start with some rules of exponents
and try to simplifiy the left side
hello
can u help me?
ok the question above
$$ \frac{x^4}{x^2}$$ simplifies to
Brandon H
do you know what $$x^4*x^2$$ simplifies to?
Brandon H
what is another way to write $$x^{-2}$$ ?
if you can answer these three "easier" problem you should be able to apply teh same concept to your orginial one
ik this
Brandon H
What is the answer
ik this
$$x^6$$ that is correct
Brandon H
i was correct
what about this one
Correct
last one?
$$x^{-a} = \frac{1}{x^a}$$
Brandon H
you should had known this because you were able to solve the other two
because
$$x^a * x^b = x^{a+b}$$
Brandon H
and if
yeah
$$\frac{x^4}{x^2} = x^4*x^{-2}$$ then $$ \frac{x^4}{x^2} = x^{4 + (-2)}$$
Brandon H
back to the orginial problem
aight
is it possible to simplify the denominator and numerator in this problem?
if it is how would you do it?
That is one way
so i cancel it all out to get the values of a b c
yeah you can do that
but do you understand why that works?
no not really
$$\frac{9^{12} * 7^4 * 5^8 * 7}{7^2 * 9^5 *5 * 9^3} $$
Brandon H
You can simplify the numerator by grouping all of the like terms
$$\frac{9^{12} * (7^4 * 7)* 5^8 }{z} $$
which simplifies to
$$\frac{9^{12} * (7^5)* 5^8 }{z} $$
Brandon H
you can simplify the denominator by doing the same thing
$$\frac{z}{7^2 * (9^5 * 9^3 * 5 } $$
which simplifies to
$$\frac{z}{7^2 * (9^8) * 5 } $$
Brandon H
if you rearange the both parts so like terms are above and below each other
$$\frac{5^87^59^{12}}{5 *7^2 * 9^8) } $$
and you should know that $$\frac{a}{b} * \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ac}{bd}$$
Brandon H
which means that $$\frac{5^8 *7^5 *9^{12}} {5 *7^2 *9^8 } = \frac{5^8}{5} *\frac{7^5}{7^2} *\frac{9^{12}}{9^8}$$
so many latex mistakes. hope you understand the process tho
@unkempt parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @unkempt parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi yall
i have a question
from a khanacademy video
timestamp 1:33
how come he writes $dr = dx \hat{i} + dy \hat{j}$?
jriver
shouldn't it be $dr = \sqrt{dx^2 \hat{i} + dy^2 \hat{j}}$
jriver
thanks in advance!
dr, or more commonly dl (differential length)
There are two
$$\vec{dl} , , and , , dl$$
LUNA
$$in , 2D: ,, \vec{dl}=dx , \hat{i} + dy , \hat{j}$$
LUNA
but dl without arrow is its magnitude
using pythagorean theorem as usual for any vector
$$you , get: dl=||\vec{dl}||=\sqrt{dx²+dy²}$$
LUNA