#help-0

1 messages · Page 272 of 1

short parcel
#

i dont know derivate this

lone heartBOT
short parcel
#

in exercise i have to derivate two times in x and two times in t
but i dont konw how i am do it this

tacit arch
#

,tex .FTC2

ocean sealBOT
#

rie.mann

short parcel
#

i dont know how make this in this case

#

hello?

nimble fern
nimble fern
short parcel
nimble fern
short parcel
#

the sin² part

nimble fern
#

i see

#

d(sin²x)/dx = 2sin(x)cos(x)=sin(2x)

short parcel
#

but I don't understand how my teacher arrived at this answer

nimble fern
#

for example:

#

Take $y=\frac12\sin²(x+2t)$, then

ocean sealBOT
#

biscuityxd

nimble fern
#

$y_x=\frac122\sin(x+2t)\cos(x+2t)\cdot1$

ocean sealBOT
#

biscuityxd

nimble fern
#

$=\frac12\sin(2(x+2t))$

ocean sealBOT
#

biscuityxd

nimble fern
#

and arrived to ½ sin(2x+4t)

lone heartBOT
#

@short parcel Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @short parcel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

elfin iron
#

I have an assignment due for tomorrow, and Im struggling to pick between the 2nd and theid

#

Could you help me find out

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @elfin iron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

gg

lilac tendon
#

<@&286206848099549185>

lone heartBOT
#

Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.

sour dove
#

also we can't help on quizzes or test

lilac tendon
#

oh

sour dove
#

I recommend deleting the question and typing .close with this warning. It's normally a bannable offense but since you're new we'll let it slide

lilac tendon
#

ok

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lilac tendon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

sour dove
lilac tendon
sour dove
#

if it's related to a quiz, no. Homework, yes

lilac tendon
#

ok

lone heartBOT
# lilac tendon <@&286206848099549185>

Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

umbral acorn
#

can someone confirm two of my answers for some questions?

mental flame
#

Send them so we can see

umbral acorn
mental flame
#

Looks good 👍

umbral acorn
#

wb this?

#

@mental flame

mental flame
#

Looks good, but when finding the slope you put "y/x". Slope is defined as "change in y over change in x" not just y/x

umbral acorn
#

okay

#

ill change that

#

thanks

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @umbral acorn

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

mental flame
#

Np 👍

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

opaque ocean
#

how do i what even

lone heartBOT
tardy stag
#

oh that's a fun one

#

do you have access to a graphing calculator and/or desmos?

opaque ocean
#

desmos yeah

tardy stag
#

plot each of the options and see which one makes the most sense for a microphone's "field of view"

opaque ocean
#

how do i make it polar

#

the round graph

#

thing

tardy stag
#

uhhhh i remember having trouble finding that sec

opaque ocean
#

oh i was using x instead of theta oops

opaque ocean
#

how do i know which is correc

#

they both point in the same direciton

tardy stag
#

yeah so clearly it's not the first or the second

#

we're micing a choir here, right? choirs typically are standing on risers like this

#

and you'd probably put the mic in front of them some distance away, so they all can sing into it

opaque ocean
#

so the cardiod

#

assuming the buttcheek part is facing the audience

#

cuz the other side conforms more closely to the shape of the stands

#

?

tardy stag
#

the buttcheek part
lmao

#

yes exactly

opaque ocean
#

lesgo

#

and then for 2nd question

#

r=3 makes the most sense ig

tardy stag
#

i don't see an obvious choice for that one tbh

opaque ocean
#

wait yeah

#

edgenuity bad

#

thanks for the help

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @opaque ocean

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

I need help in understanding how they got to the right answer cuz I’m confused on this topic

#

End behavior refers to what happens to the graph as it approaches the bounds of negative infinity and positive infinity

#

What we're looking at here is a simple graph: y = -x^3

#

Right!

#

So take the limits of -x^3 as x goes to -∞ and +∞

#

Negative by negative equals positive

#

Therefore

alpine sable
#

$\lim_{x \to -\infty} -x^3 = \infty$

ocean sealBOT
#

crimsondevil_rias

alpine sable
#

And

#

$\lim_{x \to +\infty} -x^3 = -\infty$

ocean sealBOT
#

crimsondevil_rias

alpine sable
#

Oh so this is how they got the answer

#

I c

#

Yeah, this involves infinite limits/limits at infinty

#

Yes

alpine sable
lament forge
#

even if you don't recognise it as being specifically x^3 you can also just look at the graph in this case (which i think is probably what they intended)

lament forge
#

"x approaches negative infinity" means going left

#

and looking at the graph, as you go left it's going up
so as x goes left towards -infinity, f(x) is going up towards infinity

alpine sable
#

@lament forge but the thing is

#

X is the middle line right

#

The thing is x is moving to the left side

#

So how’s that infinit

lament forge
#

so on that vertical line in the middle, x is 0

alpine sable
#

Yes

lament forge
#

to the left of that, x is negative, and as you go further left it becomes a bigger negative number

alpine sable
#

Rigt

#

Right is positive

lament forge
#

yep

alpine sable
#

Left is negative

lament forge
#

and then the question is asking about f(x), which is the vertical position

alpine sable
#

Right t

#

F(x) is horizontal

lament forge
#

...i'm not really sure what that means?

#

x is the horizontal position, and f(x) is the vertical position

alpine sable
#

Right

alpine sable
#

@lament forge I might need some help

#

In like few questions

#

Want to go into dms

lament forge
#

we can stay here
this channel might close if we stop using it but if it does you can just open another one

alpine sable
#

@lament forge there u go

#

Is this as x approaches infinity, f(x) approaches neg infinity

lament forge
#

yes

alpine sable
#

There you go

#

That's f(x) = -x^2

#

That graph approaches -∞ no matter if x goes to -∞ or ∞

#

So is this right

#

@alpine sable

lament forge
#

as x approaches negative infinity, f(x) approaches infinity
...how did you get that?

alpine sable
#

Becuse it’s going downwards right

#

So theoretically it should be neg?

lament forge
#

...yes it is
so why would that mean f(x) is approaching infinity...?

alpine sable
#

Wiat it’s the last

lament forge
#

yep

alpine sable
#

I think

#

The answer is

#

The first

#

Correct

lament forge
#

correct

alpine sable
#

Because x^2 approaches ∞ on both ends

#

Alrt

alpine sable
#

Is it not ll the last one tho

#

No

#

It's not the last one

#

Graph y = 1/2 x^2

#

Oh yes

alpine sable
#

That’s why I’m just kinda needing help

#

You're new to limits at infinity?

alpine sable
#

Yes

alpine sable
#

Like 2 weeks ago

#

Lmfao

#

All you have to know about limits at infinity is

#

Look at the graph and the x-axis

#

Yes

#

But some times there isn’t a graph yj

#

As you move left on the x-axis, you approach -∞

#

Yes

#

As u move to the right

#

It’s positive

#

+∞ yes

alpine sable
#

It should be positive

#

Right

#

Graph 5/4 x^3

#

Right

#

X is positive

#

If x goes to +∞, f(x) should go to +∞ as well

#

Yep

#

So everything’s positive then

#

Wait

#

What about if x goes to -∞

#

Negative cubed is negative

#

Thus, f(x) → -∞ as x → -∞

#

Yes

alpine sable
#

That’s the thing

#

In this case the cubed is positive

alpine sable
#

Wait

alpine sable
#

So the answe is

alpine sable
#

When I used desmos

#

The graph I showed you is 5/4 x^3

alpine sable
#

Look at the direction the graph is heading

#

Rigt

#

It’s going toward the right side

#

That's going from -x to +x

#

But what happens if x approaches ∞?

#

If x = ∞, f(x) = f(∞) = 5/4 ∞^3 = ∞

#

Right

alpine sable
#

Then it’s positive tho

#

Right

#

Look again

#

Start at x = 0

#

Oh shoot mb it’s postifie

#

Then move left on the x-axis

#

Posit

#

You can clearly see that f(x) = 5/4 x^3 approaches -∞

#

Right

#

Cuz it’s going toward the left side

#

Ergo

#

So it’s this

#

Is this what the answer is

#

$\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{5}{4} x^3 = -\infty$

ocean sealBOT
#

crimsondevil_rias

alpine sable
#

Correct

#

There you go

#

Yes

#

So wait my answer is right then

#

@alpine sable

#

It’s that or it’s

#

I mean C

#

Yeah

#

Cause the roots are where the graph crosses the x-axis

#

Wait it’s C right

#

It is C cause you're referring to the equation of the graph

#

Yep it’s a W

#

Yep

#

The answe is C

#

y = (x - 4)(x - 1)(x + 2)(x + 5)

#

But in actuality

alpine sable
#

Yeah, that equation is off

#

What is C? The highlighted answer?

#

Yes

#

No no

#

@alpine sable this one

#

the one which is highlighted nis w

#

Is C

#

Yes

#

That's the correct one

#

Yep

#

x = -4, x = -1, x = 2, x = 5

#

That's where the graph crosses the x-axis

#

But be careful of double or even triple roots

#

Is it the one which is highlighted

#

I think I’m getting a hang on this

#

Just a bit more practice and il be good to go

#

Yes, that's correct

#

But I have to warn you about double and triple roots

#

Sometimes the graph will touch y = 0 at a certain x

#

If that's the case, that root occurs twice

#

The question is in photo 1

#

Answer in photo 2

#

Correct

#

Because x + 4 = x - (-4)

#

And x = -4 is a root of the graph

#

You're getting the hang of it!

#

Ok

#

Is this right

#

Ohhh

#

This is gonna be tough

#

You have to look at the roots of each graph

#

And then work out their equations

#

Okay

#

I’ll do that

#

The first one on the top left has roots at x = -8, x = -3, and x = 2

alpine sable
#

I think I got it

#

So the equation of that one is y = (x+8)(x+3)(x-2)

#

The same applies for this question

#

But you see how the graph in this question touches 0 then goes away at 2 points?

#

That's the "double root" I warned you about

#

Double roots are roots that occur twice in the equation of the graph

#

For example

#

(x-2)^2

#

Okay

alpine sable
#

Oh yes I remember

#

This is the graph of (x-2)^2

#

Or in expanded form, x^2 - 4x + 4

#

Right

#

Alrt thx man

#

I got the practice right

#

I got 100% man

#

Thx a lot for ur help crimson

#

Now I’m ready for the test

#

I hope I can get a good mark on my test

#

Good luck man

#

@alpine sable thx 4 everything man

alpine sable
#

👍

#

Alrt I ama go have fun now

#

I’ll do the test late

#

I’ll let yk what I got for my test

#

In dms

#

If you need more tips, you can always DM me whenever I'm free

alpine sable
#

What time for u now

#

It's currently 5:15 PM for me

#

Oh Alrt

#

And no

#

Where u from

#

I do not live in Australia

#

Oh where do u life

#

I’m from India

#

No no

#

I came for summer

#

I’m here for summer vacation

#

Guam

alpine sable
#

Alrt I’ll msg u in 2 hours then

#

Thx have fun bye

#

Shoot

#

.closw

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @primal hemlock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

alpine sable
#

.reppen

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

civic flame
#

I have 2 variable, namely a and b both variable can be negative or positive, it can also be fraction, but it is always real number. I want it so that when both a and b have value of between 0 to 1 the function will give 0 value, if any of the value in a or b is not in between 0 to 1, then the function will give 1 as value

civic flame
#

can someone think a function that can do that?

tardy stag
#

yes it's the function that takes two inputs a and b, both real numbers, and outputs 0 if both a and b have a value between 0 and 1, and outputs 1 otherwise

civic flame
tardy stag
#

what i mean is - you've already defined such a function

civic flame
tardy stag
#

do it piecewise

#

if you want notation

civic flame
#

how?

tardy stag
#

$f(a,b) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{ if } 0 < a < 1 \text{ and } 0 < b < 1 \ 0 & \text{ otherwise } \end{cases}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Hayley

tardy stag
#

oh it's the other way around

#

still

civic flame
#

maybe something with multiplication, mod or something?

tardy stag
#

can you use floor?

civic flame
#

I can

tardy stag
#

testing $\floor{x}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Hayley

tardy stag
#

ok good

#

$f(a,b) = \floor{|a|} + \floor{|b|}$ correctly outputs 0 for 0 < a,b < 1 and outside that region outputs a positive number

ocean sealBOT
#

Hayley

tardy stag
#

that's floor of absolute value

#

uhhh if we define g(x) like this:

civic flame
#

one without word please

#

I need it like uh... normal math formula?

tardy stag
#

$g(x) = \frac{\frac{\floor{2x-\frac12}}{|\floor{2x-\frac12}|} + 1}{2}$ maps 0 to 0 and all positive numbers to 1... i think

ocean sealBOT
#

Hayley

tardy stag
civic flame
#

wait which one is a and b?

tardy stag
#

none, we're going to take the output of f(a,b) and put it into g

civic flame
#

oh!

#

wait let me try

tardy stag
#

it will be a mess

civic flame
tardy stag
#

did you include the absolute value

civic flame
tardy stag
#

oh oops it outputs 0 for negative numbers too dang it

civic flame
#

I can also use clamp which force any value to be between 0 to 1, like -5 will output 0, and 4 will output 1.
I just can't use if

tardy stag
#

oh clamp seems helpful

#

if we clamp to (-1, 1)

civic flame
#

can we do it?

tardy stag
#

idk

civic flame
#

hmm...

tardy stag
#

what else can you use?

#
      • / *
  • sqrt, square
  • abs
  • clamp
  • floor, ceil
#

oh it's just flip the order of the floor and abs i think

civic flame
#

mostly all other things, just not if

#

mod, sin cos, log

tardy stag
#

try $f(a,b) = |\floor{a}| + |\floor{b}|$

ocean sealBOT
#

Hayley

civic flame
tardy stag
#

that's what i wanted

#

and then just clamp it to (0,1)

#

done

civic flame
tardy stag
#

that was fun!

tardy stag
civic flame
#

lol

lone heartBOT
#

@civic flame Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @civic flame

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mental flame
#

When we arrange numbers in that format, the first number would be the lesser of the 2

sly mantle
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sly mantle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jagged plume
#

How many solutions does the equation 2x+3(pi)sinx = 0 have? between 0 and 2pi

lone heartBOT
#

@jagged plume Has your question been resolved?

nimble fern
#

this looks so hard
what have you tried
or even
what can you use?

jagged plume
#

i have no idea

#

ive never seen that before

#

Normally its like the 2 trigs

nimble fern
#

true

#

i kinda cheated and use Desmos to draw it out, looks like it has 3 roots in [0,2pi]

#

but I'm still thinking how to proof that

lone heartBOT
#

@jagged plume Has your question been resolved?

alpine sable
# jagged plume How many solutions does the equation 2x+3(pi)sinx = 0 have? between 0 and 2pi

$$2x + 3\pi \sin(x)=0$$
To figure out the number of roots, you must consider how many times this function crosses the $x$-axis over the interval $[0,2\pi]$. \
First, let's verify the most obvious solution which is $x=0$.
$$f(x) = 2x + 3\pi \sin(x)$$
$$f(0)=0+0=0$$
So, we already know there must be at least one root over this interval. Now, since we have implied this crosses the $x$-axis once, we need to consider if it turns back to cross it again. So we need to look for a stationary point.
$$f'(x)=0$$
$$f'(x)=2+3\pi\cos(x)$$
$$f'(x)=0=2+3\pi \cos(x)$$
$$\cos(x)=\frac{2}{3\pi}$$
Over the interval $[0, 2\pi]$, the above mentioned equation will have at least two roots. And we know they will definitely not be $0$ or $2\pi$. \
We know $f(2\pi)>0$, f(x) does cross the $x$-axis at least once and has two stationary points over our given interval. So, we can conclude it will have 3 roots.

ocean sealBOT
#

brotherimusttalk1234

lone heartBOT
#

@jagged plume Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jagged plume

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ have the joint pdf shown below: \
$f(x,y) = \begin{cases}
cxy^2 & 0 \le y \le x \le 1 \
0 & otherwise
\end{cases}$\
a) Find $c$. (solved; c = 15)\
b) Find the following probabilities: \
i. $P(X < 1, Y < 0.5)$ (solved; $P(X < 1, Y < 0.5) = \frac{5}{8}$)\
ii. $P(X + Y < 1)$ \
c) Find the marginal pdfs for $x$ and $y$. (Solved; $f_X(x) = 5x^4, f_Y(y) = \frac{15}{2} (y^2 - y^4)$ \
d) Are $X$ and $Y$ independent? (Solved; No, since $f_{X,Y}(x,y) \ne f_X(x)f(Y_y) \forall x,y)$\
e) Find the expected value of $Y$ ($EY$). \
f) Find the conditional probability function of $Y$ given $X = x$ is defined ($f_{Y|X}(y|x)$).

ocean sealBOT
#

crimsondevil_rias

alpine sable
#

I'm still stuck on part B, ii

#

This is what the region looks like for P(X + Y < 1)

#

Had to consult WolframAlpha to confirm, since Desmos cannot handle 2 chained inequalities

foggy copper
#

y can't go above 1/2

alpine sable
#

How is it supposed to look like then?

#

Consulted libretexts, this is what 0 <= y <= x <= 1 looks like
Honest to goodness truth

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chilly pike
#

I need help understanding the second fundamental theorem of calculus

chilly pike
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
wispy ibex
#

What are you not understanding ?

chilly pike
wispy ibex
#

Do u know what an integral is?

chilly pike
#

yeah ik what integrals and derivatives are

#

I just don't understand the theorem

wispy ibex
#

This theorem merely states that F'(x) = f (x)

chilly pike
#

I don't get the parts where f(t) is introduced

wispy ibex
#

You integrate f between a and x, this is F(x)

#

t is just a mute variable

chilly pike
#

ah I see

#

the integral of f(t) between x and a is F(x)

#

and the derivative of this results in f(x)

#

so the main point of the theorem is that the derivative of F(x) results in the original function

#

I understand now, thanks for the help

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @chilly pike

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

wispy ibex
#

Yeah exactly and this will be the main way to compute an integral

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

I know that sin(2pi) = 0

#

so we can neglect the fraction inside hte logarithm

#

but what do I do next

zealous lichen
#

what is this monster

worn fox
#

Just start simplifying

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @rigid kelp

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

scenic wing
#

so what is x here

lone heartBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

rancid trail
#

Sorry

scenic wing
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @scenic wing

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

keen furnace
#

I don’t understand

lone heartBOT
keen furnace
#

So in integration

#

Dx means integrating in respect to x

#

But in integration by part

#

I can integrate stuff and differentiate in respect to that

#

While I can also differentiate stuff to integrate it

#

It’s so confusing

zealous lichen
#

are you confused about integration by parts?

#

integration by parts is really just the product rule reversed

keen furnace
#

no, I understand the concept

#

I think this can help me explain

#

What I don’t get is

#

Why can I integrate e^-x

#

And make the integral to be I respect of -e^-x

#

I understand we need it in this form for integration by part to work

#

But I want to know why we can do so

zealous lichen
#

ok

#

do you remember the product rule

#

when doing differentiation

keen furnace
#

Yes

#

So it’s just f(x)*g(x)=f’(x)g(x)+g’(x)f(x)

#

When differentiating

zealous lichen
#

what happens if we integrate both sides

keen furnace
#

It is reversed?

zealous lichen
keen furnace
#

It becomes

#

I think my expression is incorrect

zealous lichen
#

yeah

keen furnace
#

Ah

#

I have to write is as

#

D/dx f(x)*g(x)

#

= d/dx f(x)*g(x) + d/dx g(x)*f(x)

zealous lichen
#

you forgot brackets

keen furnace
#

I think I kind of get it

#

Give me a second

#

Ah

#

thanks I got it

#

I think so

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @keen furnace

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

zealous lichen
#

wow ok

#

you didn't even need my explanation lol you are so smar

#

t

keen furnace
#

no lol

#

I was looking through my books

#

because

#

When u gave me the tips

#

I just kinda referred back to a chapter in my book

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

please explain me what is factor theorem

alpine sable
#

please

#

i am so confused so heres the definition i found, if in any polynomial x=a=0, then z-a is factor of that poly

gray isle
#

poor description / mix up with variables

alpine sable
#

but lets say x-4 be a polynomial and we know x=4=0 then x-4 shiuld be factor which is not

mortal trellis
#

x-4 is a factor of itself

gray isle
#

don't conflate =0 with is a zero

alpine sable
#

how

gray isle
#

x-4 = 1 * (x-4)

alpine sable
gray isle
#

x-4 is 1 multiple of x-4

vale wigeon
#

x-4 is a factor of x-4 though

#

anything's a factor of itself

alpine sable
#

yeah but if we put x-4=x in the polynomial x-4 we dont get 0

gray isle
#

if x=a is a zero of a polynomial p(x), p(a) = 0
and (x-a) is a factor

vale wigeon
alpine sable
#

then

#

isnt factor=value whjich we put in pooly to get 0

vale wigeon
#

no, those are roots.

#

a factor is itself a polynomial by which your polynomial is divisible

alpine sable
#

huh

gray isle
#

the polynomial $\blue{x-4}$ being divided by $\red{x-4}$:
$$\frac{\blue{x-4}}{\red{x-4}} = 1$$

ocean sealBOT
#

ℝamonov

gray isle
#

by factor theorem, since x-4 is a factor of the poylnomial,
x=4 is a zero of that polynomial,
when x=4, the polynomial x-4 will be 0
subbing x=4
gives 4 - 4 which is indeed 0

alpine sable
#

thanks @vale wigeon @gray isle i get it i was confusing factor with roota this all time

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mint jungle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

flat roost
#

is 2(a) correct? ive checked multiple times but i dont think the answer can possibly be 0. sorry if im bad at understanding partial differentiation as im new to it, thankss

flat roost
#

^the question reads "Use chain rule to find ∂z/∂r and ∂z/∂θ for the following functions:"

zealous lichen
#

I think it is correct

#

to verify just find z(r,theta) and find dz/dr that way

tawny tapir
#

i just worked for it now

flat roost
#

ohh thanks guys

#

but how can the rate of change possibly be 0? im really confused sorry

zealous lichen
#

it means z doesn't change when changing r

#

nothing special

flat roost
#

oh

#

for total differential of f(x,y) must i write total differential = (∂f/∂x) dx + (∂f/∂y) dy?

#

or is it (∂f/∂x) ∂x + (∂f/∂y) ∂y?

zealous lichen
#

I think it's dx and dy

#

not sure though

#

yeah the wikipedia use dx

flat roost
#

ohh

#

thanks very much

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @flat roost

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

warm bolt
#

This is really weird what im going to ask

lone heartBOT
near apex
#

Weird is fine. Inappropriate is not.

rancid trail
#

Ask it, no problem if it is weird (and also if it is related to math)

warm bolt
#

So im on a grade 6 level right? i was wondering if you could give me some practice questions on Algebra. The stuff im doing is like: 2+X =5. Like that but a bit more complicated

west girder
#

Are you in 6th grade?

warm bolt
#

yes

ornate ginkgo
#

How old

#

Are you

rancid trail
#

You are comfortable with multiplication and division?

warm bolt
#

yea

warm bolt
ornate ginkgo
gray isle
#

3x + 7 = 5x - 4

rancid trail
#

5 * x = 20

west girder
#

6+3=1

warm bolt
west girder
#

bye

ornate ginkgo
#

Sorry

warm bolt
rancid trail
warm bolt
rancid trail
# warm bolt 4

Sorry Lil bro you can't use discord yet, so you will probably be banned

west girder
#

Make the x on the same side

alpine sable
#

add/subtract same value on both sides to isolate a term with x

west girder
#

Yes subtract both sides by 3x

warm bolt
rancid trail
gray isle
#

<@&268886789983436800> tos violation.
we can get into 🔥💧
they'll probs have a reasonable response

warm bolt
gray isle
#

no

warm bolt
#

oh

#

well

gray isle
#

meanwhile give this a read, save it while you still can

#

,tex .algebra lesson

warm bolt
#

?

gray isle
#

wait for it

ocean sealBOT
#

ℝamonov

warm bolt
#

oh ok

rancid trail
warm bolt
#

OK thank you so much

#

i have to go now

#

Bye

rancid trail
warm bolt
#

have a great day

rancid trail
#

Use .close

#

Just type .close

#

Before you go

warm bolt
#

ok

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warm bolt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pale mason
#

I have a quite large question, I encourage anyone who would like to help me solve it to read the whole question before responding, just to avoid clutter

pale mason
#

I have a fun but light differential geometry question for anyone interested in helping me, the first premise goes…
“You're standing on the surface of the Earth. You walk one mile south, one mile west, and one mile north. You end up exactly where you started.
Where are you?”
You are obviously at the North Pole. After further thought, you realize that this works anywhere on the planet. Any square that is formed on a sphere (definition of square being all 90* angles) has 3 sides. This introduces premise 2…
“On any spherical geometry, following the edges of a 3 sided square will always result in the return to the original point in 2 (90*) turns”
Because of this we can reasonably infer that this would work on any spherical geometry, including earth, at any scale. If we define a distance for each of the legs of our triangle as x and then take the limit as 1/x goes to infinity, we see smaller and smaller 3 sided triangles (which are navigable) are produced. With this logic, we can claim that standing anywhere on a sphere and walking x distance, turning 90* walking x distance, then turning 90* and walking x distance, will result in you standing in the same spot as you started. This should work for even the smallest possible distances as we proved earlier.
Yet in practice it doesn’t… this might seem jarring after we mathematically proved it. To anyone who doubts that this doesn’t, I challenge you to get into your car and repeat the process for any given distance, I guarantee you won’t end at your starting point. If you can’t drive currently, then go into an open room in your house and try it with distance x = 2 meters.
The point is it doesn’t work even after it mathematically should. Why is this? As a pure math guy, I immensely struggle to see why this doesn’t work!

#

Lol

west girder
#

It’s a very good question though

zealous lichen
#

It's literally wrong lmao

west girder
pale mason
#

It’s wrong, but I can’t figure out why

#

Granted I’m a math major Lmaooo

worn fox
#

I don't think the premise is correct, start at the equator and go north, 2 90 degree turns aren't you going to get you back where you started

zealous lichen
#

it's simple generally if you walk south 1 mile, the west 1 mile, then north 1 mile it doesn't form a triangle/square or whatever you want to call it

worn fox
#

I don't know what you're asking then

pale mason
#

I am asking why there are discrepancies between the pure math and the real world

zealous lichen
#

your math is wrong I told you

#

you proved nothing

#

end of story

pale mason
tardy stag
pale mason
#

Turn 90* from when you originally walk south

worn fox
#

You've taken the fact that a specific set of moves from the north Pole gets you back to where you started and jumped to the conclusion that 2 90 degree turns from anywhere and equal length walks will get you back with no justification

pale mason
#

There is no east or west pole

#

I claimed only that triangles on spheres are 3 sided

#

Assuming that they are navigable

#

Where should I go to solve this then lol?

tardy stag
#

imagine starting like 10 feet south of the north pole and walking east

mortal trellis
#

you dont have to be here. go away if you are annoyed by math

pale mason
#

Wtf has this chat become

#

Discord is ass sometimes lol

tardy stag
#

<@&268886789983436800> someone named Hitler just posted and deleted something? not sure didn't get a look at it

real gazelle
#

Oh boy

pale mason
#

This was it

tardy stag
#

sorry

#

oh i probably had the reply open already

mortal trellis
tardy stag
#

anyway @pale mason think about what it means to walk east along a line of latitude

#

there's something strange about "lines of latitude"

real gazelle
#

By the way stop advertising your channel in other people's help channels.

#

If you're not helping, then don't post in this channel

pale mason
#

Anyway, here’s the og problem

#

Please read it before bsing lol

#

I have a fun but light differential geometry question for anyone interested in helping me, the first premise goes…
“You're standing on the surface of the Earth. You walk one mile south, one mile west, and one mile north. You end up exactly where you started.
Where are you?”
You are obviously at the North Pole. After further thought, you realize that this works anywhere on the planet. Any square that is formed on a sphere (definition of square being all 90* angles) has 3 sides. This introduces premise 2…
“On any spherical geometry, following the edges of a 3 sided square will always result in the return to the original point in 2 (90*) turns”
Because of this we can reasonably infer that this would work on any spherical geometry, including earth, at any scale. If we define a distance for each of the legs of our triangle as x and then take the limit as 1/x goes to infinity, we see smaller and smaller 3 sided triangles (which are navigable) are produced. With this logic, we can claim that standing anywhere on a sphere and walking x distance, turning 90* walking x distance, then turning 90* and walking x distance, will result in you standing in the same spot as you started. This should work for even the smallest possible distances as we proved earlier.
Yet in practice it doesn’t… this might seem jarring after we mathematically proved it. To anyone who doubts that this doesn’t, I challenge you to get into your car and repeat the process for any given distance, I guarantee you won’t end at your starting point. If you can’t drive currently, then go into an open room in your house and try it with distance x = 2 meters.
The point is it doesn’t work even after it mathematically should. Why is this? As a pure math guy, I immensely struggle to see why this doesn’t work.

#

Lmaooo

#

have a fun but light differential geometry question for anyone interested in helping me, the first premise goes…
“You're standing on the surface of the Earth. You walk one mile south, one mile west, and one mile north. You end up exactly where you started.
Where are you?”
You are obviously at the North Pole. After further thought, you realize that this works anywhere on the planet. Any square that is formed on a sphere (definition of square being all 90* angles) has 3 sides. This introduces premise 2…
“On any spherical geometry, following the edges of a 3 sided square will always result in the return to the original point in 2 (90*) turns”
Because of this we can reasonably infer that this would work on any spherical geometry, including earth, at any scale. If we define a distance for each of the legs of our triangle as x and then take the limit as 1/x goes to infinity, we see smaller and smaller 3 sided triangles (which are navigable) are produced. With this logic, we can claim that standing anywhere on a sphere and walking x distance, turning 90* walking x distance, then turning 90* and walking x distance, will result in you standing in the same spot as you started. This should work for even the smallest possible distances as we proved earlier.
Yet in practice it doesn’t… this might seem jarring after we mathematically proved it. To anyone who doubts that this doesn’t, I challenge you to get into your car and repeat the process for any given distance, I guarantee you won’t end at your starting point. If you can’t drive currently, then go into an open room in your house and try it with distance x = 2 meters.
The point is it doesn’t work even after it mathematically should. Why is this? As a pure math guy, I immensely struggle to see why this doesn’t work.

tardy stag
#

@stray turret shut UP

pale mason
#

Bro plz stop

real gazelle
#

@stray turret I told you to stop posting here

#

(that was roketto lol, not gonna take the credit)

pale mason
#

That was epic

#

Anyway, this has been dog shit lol… everyone have a good night!

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pale mason

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

tardy stag
#

think about the question i sent you...

pale mason
#

The original east west question was a rhetorical one to lead the reader into thinking about 3 sided squares

grand oasis
#

You should post this on the Math Stack Exchange rather than here. The question is quite long. And Discord is designed to be more quick.

pale mason
#

True

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

silver quartz
lone heartBOT
silver quartz
#

how to find volume?

grand oasis
#

What have you tried?

pale mason
#

Alright

silver quartz
#

this my first time doing this so not much

pale mason
#

Think about this 2 dimensionally first

silver quartz
#

ok

pale mason
#

We have a rectangle on top of a triangle

#

If we solve for the area of the rectangle and triangle then multiply it by 9 we get our volume

#

Does that help so far?

silver quartz
#

kinda

pale mason
#

Where are u stuck

silver quartz
#

volume

pale mason
#

Area is 2d and volume is 3d

#

For example, if I have a square inch of something, I can place that on a price of paper

#

Yet if I have a cubic inch, it takes up physical space

#

So for the house, we see the rectangle is 8m by 7m by 9m, what is the volume of the box?

silver quartz
#

508

pale mason
#

Very Close

#

Try that one more time

silver quartz
#

504

pale mason
#

Yep!

#

Now for the triangle

#

Find the area of the triangle and multiply it by 9

lone heartBOT
#

@silver quartz Has your question been resolved?

silver quartz
pale mason
#

5m by 8m by 9m

#

Then divide by 2 Bc triangle

silver quartz
#

done

#

that’s it?

lone heartBOT
#

@silver quartz Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ripe comet
#

Hello! Ive been doing proofs but have been struggling. This is the problem on a clean pdf, I have already done the Understand the Problem and Make a Plan, however, for the Solve the Problem (Statements and Reasoning) I think my answer is incorrect. Please let me know how to fix it :))

ripe comet
ripe comet
lone heartBOT
#

@ripe comet Has your question been resolved?

ripe comet
#

<@&286206848099549185>

ripe comet
#

<@&286206848099549185>

ivory fern
#

hi

ripe comet
#

hello, do you know how to solve?

lone heartBOT
#

@ripe comet Has your question been resolved?

ripe comet
#

no but I’ll keep trying myself

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ripe comet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ivory olive
lone heartBOT
ivory olive
#

What did I do wrong?

#

I am basing my answer on this example that my teacher did in class

lone heartBOT
#

@ivory olive Has your question been resolved?

ivory olive
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Never mind, I think I fixed it!

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ivory olive

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chilly quiver
#

i need help

lone heartBOT
chilly quiver
#

Can someone explain to me how part 2 simplified to part 3

outer lark
#

common denominator of the numerator and then (a/b)/c = (a/bc)

chilly quiver
#

huh

#

wait

#

ioooooh

#

wait

#

i dont get it nvm

outer lark
#

ok look at the numerator first

#

1/(x+h) - 1/x

#

slap that into one fraction by finding a common denominator

chilly quiver
#

how do you find the common denominator? (x+h) x = x (x+h) right?

outer lark
chilly quiver
#

i do

#

i probably just forgot

#

but let me watch that video asap

#

okay i remember

#

let me try it

#

okay i got x-(x+h)/x(x+h)

outer lark
#

nice

#

now that is all over h

#

$\frac{\frac{x-(x+h)}{x(x+h)}}{h}$

ocean sealBOT
#

clarkie.

chilly quiver
#

yeah

#

do you have to make it multiplaction?

outer lark
#

what do you mean

chilly quiver
#

by rotating the top fraction?

outer lark
#

no, (a/b)/c = a/(bc)

#

multiplication is associative and commutative which means if we were to take x = (a/b)/c , then that implies xc = a/b or (xc)b=a, which can then be written as x(bc)=a or just x=a/(bc)

chilly quiver
#

hmm okay

chilly quiver
outer lark
#

by simplifying with what I just wrote

#

your a is x-(x+h) , b would be x(x+h), and c would obviously just be h

chilly quiver
#

okay let me take a look

#

oh

#

so what you basically did is you multiplied b with the numerator and denominator?

outer lark
#

sure

chilly quiver
#

okay lets continue to the 4th part

outer lark
#

thats just distribution and simplification

chilly quiver
#

yeah i see it now lmao

#

let me just do it then if i get stuck ill come back here

#

okay im good

#

but i have one last question

outer lark
chilly quiver
#

when do i know when to use the first principle of dervatives?

#

like if i told you to differantiate f(x) = 1/x

#

you won't use the first principle

zealous lichen
#

it's used for proofs

#

like proofing the product rules and chain rules

#

or trying to prove that d/dx x^n = nx^n-1

#

or prove that d/dx sinx = cosx

chilly quiver
#

ahh okay

#

thank you very much guys

#

this was helpful

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @chilly quiver

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

outer lark
lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

zealous lichen
#

umm don't delete original message

#

the bot get confused

dapper lynx
#

Sorry bout that

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grand falcon
#

how can you identify a 30 60 90 triangle without any angle values?

zealous lichen
#

calculate the angles using trigonometry

plain flame
#

sidelengths have a specific ratio

long quarry
zealous lichen
#

?

mental flame
grand falcon
#

ok, heres the question for refrence

#

im supposed to solve for a

#

which, according to the 30 60 90 rule, is 4.5 X sqrt3

#

unfortunately none of the answer choices come up

#

<@&286206848099549185>

heady egret
#

What is the slope of the ramp?

#

degree or..?

grand falcon
heady egret
#

what is 9/25

#

degree?

grand falcon
#

no its the slope

heady egret
#

it has 36% slope

#

then the version without ramp 0% slope

#

36% slope means 36% slipped down

grand falcon
#

so what would be A then?

heady egret
#

It was 90 degrees, if it slides down 36%, then we have 90-32,4 degrees?

grand falcon
#

oh shoot

#

so how would we be able to solve for the side lengths of the triangle?

heady egret
#

lol

#

b = 57,6° and a = 32,4°?

#

sin(32,4) = 4,5/x

#

x = hypotenus

#

wow it is

#

it got complicated

#

..

#

did we make a mistake

grand falcon
#

what does the commas stand for

heady egret
#

I don't know how you use it there but

#

its like

#

5,5 = 5.5

grand falcon
#

ohhhh

heady egret
#

do you understand

grand falcon
#

buttttt, the answer choices dont make sense

heady egret
#

yes

grand falcon
#

so are you wrong or is this sheet wrong???

#

HMMMMM

heady egret
#

dont know

grand falcon
#

oh nvm solved it

#

since the rise in the slope is 9

#

and the value of B, aka the rise of the ramp is4.5

#

multiply by 2

#

just devide 25 by 2

#

and you get 12.5

#

alr

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @grand falcon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

heady egret
#

i dont understand

#

what did you do

grand falcon
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

grand falcon
#

umm

#

you seeeee

heady egret
#

no i dont

#

4,5ft height

grand falcon
#

yup

#

the sloe

heady egret
#

9/25 slope

grand falcon
#

slope

#

the slope is merely a ratio

#

if the true height is 4.5

#

and the rise factor of the slope is 9

#

as in 9/25

#

the slope can also be 4.5/12.5

heady egret
#

yes

grand falcon
#

because 4.5/12.5 as a fraction is equal to 9/25

heady egret
#

but how did you reconcile the slope with the length

grand falcon
#

so A, which is the x value of the slope

#

is12.5

#

as you can see in the diagram

#

the triangle is the slope

heady egret
#

yes

grand falcon
#

the length of b, which we know as 4.5, is the y value of the slope

#

and the y value of the slope is 9, in 9/25

heady egret
#

what is the y value

grand falcon
#

the y value is the numerator

#

while the x value is the denominator

#

that is slope

grand falcon
heady egret
#

the length of b is the y value

grand falcon
#

because B is the vertical line of this right triangle

#

A is the horizontal line

heady egret
#

How would you respond if someone said to you that "the hypotenuse is the slope i think"?

#

yes

grand falcon
#

wait

heady egret
#

lol

grand falcon
#

hold up

heady egret
#

okay

grand falcon
#

b is the y value

#

we know that

#

and a is the x value

#

so apparently the pythagoremtheorem

heady egret
#

okay but b/a is not hypotenus

grand falcon
#

we know that

#

however

#

we know that the slope is 9/25

#

9 bneing the y value

heady egret
#

okay

grand falcon
#

screw the hypotenuse

#

we are solving for a, the horizontal line

#

so since 9 is the y value of the slope

heady egret
#

ok but the slope is 9/25

grand falcon
#

and 25 is the x factor

heady egret
#

not b/a

grand falcon
#

but the triangle itself is acting as the slope

heady egret
#

How, is the bottom base of the triangle slope?

grand falcon
#

the bottom base is the x value of the slope

#

in this case 25, as in 9/25

heady egret
#

now i draw you any triangle

#

Can we say that the short right side divided by the long right side is equal to the hypotenuse?

grand falcon
#

alright

#

but the thing is the hypotenuse does not always equal the slope

heady egret
#

yes

#

i think the length of the hypotenuse cannot be the slope

grand falcon
#

so it doesent matter

heady egret
#

because we can expand the same shape

#

and we can get different lengths with the same angles, right?

#

I think we should focus on the angles, I don't know if I'm right..

grand falcon
#

itsn ot about the angles

#

its about the side lengths

#

in this contexxt

#

the side lengths are all we get

#

we dont get any angles besides one, and that one is a right angle

#

we know the vertical side of the right triangle is equal to 4.5 feet

#

which in the slope is equal to 9, as in 9/25

#

since the slope is a ratio, we can assume that 9/25 is also equal to 4.5/12.5

#

which according to the side length of B, the vertical side, is congruent

#

so since we know that the vertical side length is 4.5

#

the horizontal side length we are solving for, a, is 12.5

#

SIDE LENGTH SLOPE
vertical=4.5 Vertical=9
Horizontal=12.5 Horizontal=25

#

slope, once again, is a ratio

#

notice how, if you devide the vertical of the slope by 2, you can acheive the side length

#

consequently, wecan do the same for the horizontal

#

@heady egret

heady egret
#

ie 12.5 for a and 4,5ft for b

#

?

grand falcon
#

yup

heady egret
#

what is hypotenus?

grand falcon
#

176.5

#

wait

#

ya

#

pythagorem theorem

heady egret
#

okay but what is 9/25

grand falcon
#

ther ratio

heady egret
#

so I don't understand how the short side divided by the long side gives the slope

grand falcon
#

it can be the opposite

heady egret
#

He didn't tell us anything like that, he just said the slope 9/25, i dont know..

#

whatever