#help-0
1 messages · Page 272 of 1
in exercise i have to derivate two times in x and two times in t
but i dont konw how i am do it this
r:
,tex .FTC2
rie.mann
why?
hello
i know how to make but the process i dont know
did you mean the integral part or the sin² part?
the sin² part
This is the question mark
but I don't understand how my teacher arrived at this answer
biscuityxd
$y_x=\frac122\sin(x+2t)\cos(x+2t)\cdot1$
biscuityxd
$=\frac12\sin(2(x+2t))$
biscuityxd
and arrived to ½ sin(2x+4t)
@short parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @short parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have an assignment due for tomorrow, and Im struggling to pick between the 2nd and theid
Could you help me find out
.close
Closed by @elfin iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gg
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
also we can't help on quizzes or test
oh
I recommend deleting the question and typing .close with this warning. It's normally a bannable offense but since you're new we'll let it slide
Closed by @lilac tendon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thanks! best of luck
could i still ask people to explain a concpet that is related to a quiz question?
if it's related to a quiz, no. Homework, yes
ok
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone confirm two of my answers for some questions?
Send them so we can see
Looks good 👍
Looks good, but when finding the slope you put "y/x". Slope is defined as "change in y over change in x" not just y/x
Closed by @umbral acorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Np 👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i what even
desmos yeah
plot each of the options and see which one makes the most sense for a microphone's "field of view"
oh i was using x instead of theta oops
so for the first question the 3rd option is a bit smaller and rounder and the 4th is a cardiod but a bit bigger
how do i know which is correc
they both point in the same direciton
yeah so clearly it's not the first or the second
we're micing a choir here, right? choirs typically are standing on risers like this
and you'd probably put the mic in front of them some distance away, so they all can sing into it
so the cardiod
assuming the buttcheek part is facing the audience
cuz the other side conforms more closely to the shape of the stands
?
i don't see an obvious choice for that one tbh
Closed by @opaque ocean
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help in understanding how they got to the right answer cuz I’m confused on this topic
End behavior refers to what happens to the graph as it approaches the bounds of negative infinity and positive infinity
What we're looking at here is a simple graph: y = -x^3
Right!
So take the limits of -x^3 as x goes to -∞ and +∞
Negative by negative equals positive
Therefore
Righht cuz 2 negs cancel put to become positive
$\lim_{x \to -\infty} -x^3 = \infty$
crimsondevil_rias
crimsondevil_rias
Oh so this is how they got the answer
I c
Yeah, this involves infinite limits/limits at infinty
Yes
I am just new to this concepts
even if you don't recognise it as being specifically x^3 you can also just look at the graph in this case (which i think is probably what they intended)
Like this
"x approaches negative infinity" means going left
and looking at the graph, as you go left it's going up
so as x goes left towards -infinity, f(x) is going up towards infinity
Right
@lament forge but the thing is
X is the middle line right
The thing is x is moving to the left side
So how’s that infinit
not really
"x" is the horizontal position
so on that vertical line in the middle, x is 0
Yes
to the left of that, x is negative, and as you go further left it becomes a bigger negative number
yep
Left is negative
and then the question is asking about f(x), which is the vertical position
...i'm not really sure what that means?
x is the horizontal position, and f(x) is the vertical position
Right
That’s what I said right maybe I might have said it wrongly
@lament forge I might need some help
In like few questions
Want to go into dms
we can stay here
this channel might close if we stop using it but if it does you can just open another one
Okay
@lament forge there u go
Is this as x approaches infinity, f(x) approaches neg infinity
yes
Mk
There you go
That's f(x) = -x^2
That graph approaches -∞ no matter if x goes to -∞ or ∞
So is this right
@alpine sable
as x approaches negative infinity, f(x) approaches infinity
...how did you get that?
...yes it is
so why would that mean f(x) is approaching infinity...?
Wiat it’s the last
It’s the last
yep
correct
Wait crimson
Is it not ll the last one tho
No
It's not the last one
Graph y = 1/2 x^2
Oh yes
I’m just so new to this lesson
That’s why I’m just kinda needing help
You're new to limits at infinity?
I just started learning this
Like 2 weeks ago
Lmfao
All you have to know about limits at infinity is
Look at the graph and the x-axis
Yes
But some times there isn’t a graph yj
As you move left on the x-axis, you approach -∞
Yes
As u move to the right
It’s positive
+∞ yes
So if I’m right on this
It should be positive
Right
Graph 5/4 x^3
Right
X is positive
If x goes to +∞, f(x) should go to +∞ as well
Yep
So everything’s positive then
Wait
What about if x goes to -∞
Negative cubed is negative
Thus, f(x) → -∞ as x → -∞
Yes
The cubed is not negative tho
That’s the thing
In this case the cubed is positive
That’s what I also got
When I used desmos
The graph I showed you is 5/4 x^3
Yep
Look at the direction the graph is heading
Rigt
It’s going toward the right side
That's going from -x to +x
But what happens if x approaches ∞?
If x = ∞, f(x) = f(∞) = 5/4 ∞^3 = ∞
Right
If x approaches neg
Then it’s positive tho
Right
Look again
Start at x = 0
Oh shoot mb it’s postifie
Then move left on the x-axis
Posit
You can clearly see that f(x) = 5/4 x^3 approaches -∞
Right
Cuz it’s going toward the left side
Ergo
So it’s this
Is this what the answer is
$\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{5}{4} x^3 = -\infty$
crimsondevil_rias
Correct
There you go
Yes
So wait my answer is right then
@alpine sable
It’s that or it’s
I mean C
Yeah
Cause the roots are where the graph crosses the x-axis
Wait it’s C right
It is C cause you're referring to the equation of the graph
Yep it’s a W
Yep
The answe is C
y = (x - 4)(x - 1)(x + 2)(x + 5)
But in actuality
?
Yeah, that equation is off
What is C? The highlighted answer?
Yes
No no
@alpine sable this one
the one which is highlighted nis w
Is C
Yes
That's the correct one
Yep
x = -4, x = -1, x = 2, x = 5
That's where the graph crosses the x-axis
But be careful of double or even triple roots
Is it the one which is highlighted
I think I’m getting a hang on this
Just a bit more practice and il be good to go
Yes, that's correct
But I have to warn you about double and triple roots
Sometimes the graph will touch y = 0 at a certain x
If that's the case, that root occurs twice
The question is in photo 1
Answer in photo 2
Correct
Because x + 4 = x - (-4)
And x = -4 is a root of the graph
You're getting the hang of it!
Ok
Is this right
7
Ohhh
This is gonna be tough
You have to look at the roots of each graph
And then work out their equations
Okay
I’ll do that
The first one on the top left has roots at x = -8, x = -3, and x = 2
Yew don’t worry about it
I think I got it
So the equation of that one is y = (x+8)(x+3)(x-2)
The same applies for this question
But you see how the graph in this question touches 0 then goes away at 2 points?
That's the "double root" I warned you about
Double roots are roots that occur twice in the equation of the graph
For example
(x-2)^2
Okay
Right
Oh yes I remember
This is the graph of (x-2)^2
Or in expanded form, x^2 - 4x + 4
Right
Alrt thx man
I got the practice right
I got 100% man
Thx a lot for ur help crimson
Now I’m ready for the test
I hope I can get a good mark on my test
Good luck man
@alpine sable thx 4 everything man
Thx bro
👍
Alrt I ama go have fun now
I’ll do the test late
I’ll let yk what I got for my test
In dms
If you need more tips, you can always DM me whenever I'm free
Which is
What time for u now
It's currently 5:15 PM for me
Oh Alrt
And no
Where u from
I do not live in Australia
Oh where do u life
I’m from India
No no
I came for summer
I’m here for summer vacation
Guam
I c
Alrt I’ll msg u in 2 hours then
Thx have fun bye
Shoot
.closw
.close
Closed by @primal hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reppen
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have 2 variable, namely a and b both variable can be negative or positive, it can also be fraction, but it is always real number. I want it so that when both a and b have value of between 0 to 1 the function will give 0 value, if any of the value in a or b is not in between 0 to 1, then the function will give 1 as value
can someone think a function that can do that?
yes it's the function that takes two inputs a and b, both real numbers, and outputs 0 if both a and b have a value between 0 and 1, and outputs 1 otherwise
you know such or similar function Hayley?
what i mean is - you've already defined such a function
but I don't know how to write them...
how?
$f(a,b) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{ if } 0 < a < 1 \text{ and } 0 < b < 1 \ 0 & \text{ otherwise } \end{cases}$
Hayley
maybe something that don't use if? I can't use if here
maybe something with multiplication, mod or something?
can you use floor?
testing $\floor{x}$
Hayley
ok good
$f(a,b) = \floor{|a|} + \floor{|b|}$ correctly outputs 0 for 0 < a,b < 1 and outside that region outputs a positive number
Hayley
$g(x) = \frac{\frac{\floor{2x-\frac12}}{|\floor{2x-\frac12}|} + 1}{2}$ maps 0 to 0 and all positive numbers to 1... i think
Hayley
this is a very normal math formula
wait which one is a and b?
none, we're going to take the output of f(a,b) and put it into g
it will be a mess
this is the output of f(a,b) btw
did you include the absolute value
yes
I can also use clamp which force any value to be between 0 to 1, like -5 will output 0, and 4 will output 1.
I just can't use if
can we do it?
idk
hmm...
what else can you use?
-
-
- / *
-
- sqrt, square
- abs
- clamp
- floor, ceil
oh it's just flip the order of the floor and abs i think
try $f(a,b) = |\floor{a}| + |\floor{b}|$
Hayley
wow amazing
thanks! ❤️
that was fun!
i'm glad you didn't have to implement this disaster
lol
@civic flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @civic flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When we arrange numbers in that format, the first number would be the lesser of the 2
.close
Closed by @sly mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How many solutions does the equation 2x+3(pi)sinx = 0 have? between 0 and 2pi
@jagged plume Has your question been resolved?
this looks so hard
what have you tried
or even
what can you use?
true
i kinda cheated and use Desmos to draw it out, looks like it has 3 roots in [0,2pi]
but I'm still thinking how to proof that
@jagged plume Has your question been resolved?
$$2x + 3\pi \sin(x)=0$$
To figure out the number of roots, you must consider how many times this function crosses the $x$-axis over the interval $[0,2\pi]$. \
First, let's verify the most obvious solution which is $x=0$.
$$f(x) = 2x + 3\pi \sin(x)$$
$$f(0)=0+0=0$$
So, we already know there must be at least one root over this interval. Now, since we have implied this crosses the $x$-axis once, we need to consider if it turns back to cross it again. So we need to look for a stationary point.
$$f'(x)=0$$
$$f'(x)=2+3\pi\cos(x)$$
$$f'(x)=0=2+3\pi \cos(x)$$
$$\cos(x)=\frac{2}{3\pi}$$
Over the interval $[0, 2\pi]$, the above mentioned equation will have at least two roots. And we know they will definitely not be $0$ or $2\pi$. \
We know $f(2\pi)>0$, f(x) does cross the $x$-axis at least once and has two stationary points over our given interval. So, we can conclude it will have 3 roots.
brotherimusttalk1234
@jagged plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jagged plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ have the joint pdf shown below: \
$f(x,y) = \begin{cases}
cxy^2 & 0 \le y \le x \le 1 \
0 & otherwise
\end{cases}$\
a) Find $c$. (solved; c = 15)\
b) Find the following probabilities: \
i. $P(X < 1, Y < 0.5)$ (solved; $P(X < 1, Y < 0.5) = \frac{5}{8}$)\
ii. $P(X + Y < 1)$ \
c) Find the marginal pdfs for $x$ and $y$. (Solved; $f_X(x) = 5x^4, f_Y(y) = \frac{15}{2} (y^2 - y^4)$ \
d) Are $X$ and $Y$ independent? (Solved; No, since $f_{X,Y}(x,y) \ne f_X(x)f(Y_y) \forall x,y)$\
e) Find the expected value of $Y$ ($EY$). \
f) Find the conditional probability function of $Y$ given $X = x$ is defined ($f_{Y|X}(y|x)$).
crimsondevil_rias
I'm still stuck on part B, ii
This is what the region looks like for P(X + Y < 1)
Had to consult WolframAlpha to confirm, since Desmos cannot handle 2 chained inequalities
y can't go above 1/2
How is it supposed to look like then?
Consulted libretexts, this is what 0 <= y <= x <= 1 looks like
Honest to goodness truth
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help understanding the second fundamental theorem of calculus
What are you not understanding ?
the whole thing
Do u know what an integral is?
This theorem merely states that F'(x) = f (x)
I don't get the parts where f(t) is introduced
ah I see
the integral of f(t) between x and a is F(x)
and the derivative of this results in f(x)
so the main point of the theorem is that the derivative of F(x) results in the original function
I understand now, thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @chilly pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Yeah exactly and this will be the main way to compute an integral
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know that sin(2pi) = 0
so we can neglect the fraction inside hte logarithm
but what do I do next
what is this monster
Just start simplifying
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rigid kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so what is x here
Sorry
.close
Closed by @scenic wing
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t understand
So in integration
Dx means integrating in respect to x
But in integration by part
I can integrate stuff and differentiate in respect to that
While I can also differentiate stuff to integrate it
It’s so confusing
are you confused about integration by parts?
integration by parts is really just the product rule reversed
no, I understand the concept
I think this can help me explain
What I don’t get is
Why can I integrate e^-x
And make the integral to be I respect of -e^-x
I understand we need it in this form for integration by part to work
But I want to know why we can do so
what happens if we integrate both sides
It is reversed?
just answer me
yeah
you forgot brackets
I think I kind of get it
Give me a second
Ah
thanks I got it
I think so
.close
Closed by @keen furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no lol
I was looking through my books
because
When u gave me the tips
I just kinda referred back to a chapter in my book
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please explain me what is factor theorem
please
i am so confused so heres the definition i found, if in any polynomial x=a=0, then z-a is factor of that poly
poor description / mix up with variables
but lets say x-4 be a polynomial and we know x=4=0 then x-4 shiuld be factor which is not
x-4 is a factor of itself
don't conflate =0 with is a zero
how
x-4 = 1 * (x-4)
wut is this
x-4 is 1 multiple of x-4
yeah but if we put x-4=x in the polynomial x-4 we dont get 0
if x=a is a zero of a polynomial p(x), p(a) = 0
and (x-a) is a factor
bad notation + you're confusing factors with roots
what a factor
then
isnt factor=value whjich we put in pooly to get 0
no, those are roots.
a factor is itself a polynomial by which your polynomial is divisible
huh
the polynomial $\blue{x-4}$ being divided by $\red{x-4}$:
$$\frac{\blue{x-4}}{\red{x-4}} = 1$$
ℝamonov
by factor theorem, since x-4 is a factor of the poylnomial,
x=4 is a zero of that polynomial,
when x=4, the polynomial x-4 will be 0
subbing x=4
gives 4 - 4 which is indeed 0
thanks @vale wigeon @gray isle i get it i was confusing factor with roota this all time
.close
Closed by @mint jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is 2(a) correct? ive checked multiple times but i dont think the answer can possibly be 0. sorry if im bad at understanding partial differentiation as im new to it, thankss
^the question reads "Use chain rule to find ∂z/∂r and ∂z/∂θ for the following functions:"
ohh thanks guys
but how can the rate of change possibly be 0? im really confused sorry
oh
for total differential of f(x,y) must i write total differential = (∂f/∂x) dx + (∂f/∂y) dy?
or is it (∂f/∂x) ∂x + (∂f/∂y) ∂y?
Closed by @flat roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is really weird what im going to ask
Weird is fine. Inappropriate is not.
Ask it, no problem if it is weird (and also if it is related to math)
So im on a grade 6 level right? i was wondering if you could give me some practice questions on Algebra. The stuff im doing is like: 2+X =5. Like that but a bit more complicated
Are you in 6th grade?
yes
You are comfortable with multiplication and division?
yea
umm... do i have to answer?
Yes
3x + 7 = 5x - 4
5 * x = 20
6+3=1
12
bye
Sorry
4
Bro I struggle with equations with variables on both sides 💀 I'm going to attend University next year 💀
ya how do i do this
Sorry Lil bro you can't use discord yet, so you will probably be banned
Make the x on the same side
add/subtract same value on both sides to isolate a term with x
Yes subtract both sides by 3x
no im 12 turning 13 in october
According to discord tos, you have to be 13 before you use discord
<@&268886789983436800> tos violation.
we can get into 🔥💧
they'll probs have a reasonable response
would the answer be 11?
no
?
wait for it
ℝamonov
oh ok
have a great day
Closed by @warm bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a quite large question, I encourage anyone who would like to help me solve it to read the whole question before responding, just to avoid clutter
I have a fun but light differential geometry question for anyone interested in helping me, the first premise goes…
“You're standing on the surface of the Earth. You walk one mile south, one mile west, and one mile north. You end up exactly where you started.
Where are you?”
You are obviously at the North Pole. After further thought, you realize that this works anywhere on the planet. Any square that is formed on a sphere (definition of square being all 90* angles) has 3 sides. This introduces premise 2…
“On any spherical geometry, following the edges of a 3 sided square will always result in the return to the original point in 2 (90*) turns”
Because of this we can reasonably infer that this would work on any spherical geometry, including earth, at any scale. If we define a distance for each of the legs of our triangle as x and then take the limit as 1/x goes to infinity, we see smaller and smaller 3 sided triangles (which are navigable) are produced. With this logic, we can claim that standing anywhere on a sphere and walking x distance, turning 90* walking x distance, then turning 90* and walking x distance, will result in you standing in the same spot as you started. This should work for even the smallest possible distances as we proved earlier.
Yet in practice it doesn’t… this might seem jarring after we mathematically proved it. To anyone who doubts that this doesn’t, I challenge you to get into your car and repeat the process for any given distance, I guarantee you won’t end at your starting point. If you can’t drive currently, then go into an open room in your house and try it with distance x = 2 meters.
The point is it doesn’t work even after it mathematically should. Why is this? As a pure math guy, I immensely struggle to see why this doesn’t work!
Lol
It’s a very good question though
It's literally wrong lmao
Yes but why?
I don't think the premise is correct, start at the equator and go north, 2 90 degree turns aren't you going to get you back where you started
it's simple generally if you walk south 1 mile, the west 1 mile, then north 1 mile it doesn't form a triangle/square or whatever you want to call it
You are
Yes
That’s the point
I don't know what you're asking then
I am asking why there are discrepancies between the pure math and the real world
Where is my math wrong
what does it mean to walk east on a sphere
Turn 90* from when you originally walk south
You've taken the fact that a specific set of moves from the north Pole gets you back to where you started and jumped to the conclusion that 2 90 degree turns from anywhere and equal length walks will get you back with no justification
There is no east or west pole
I claimed only that triangles on spheres are 3 sided
Assuming that they are navigable
Where should I go to solve this then lol?
imagine starting like 10 feet south of the north pole and walking east
you dont have to be here. go away if you are annoyed by math
<@&268886789983436800> someone named Hitler just posted and deleted something? not sure didn't get a look at it
Oh boy
This was it
(already banned in other thread)
anyway @pale mason think about what it means to walk east along a line of latitude
there's something strange about "lines of latitude"
By the way stop advertising your channel in other people's help channels.
If you're not helping, then don't post in this channel
Anyway, here’s the og problem
Please read it before bsing lol
I have a fun but light differential geometry question for anyone interested in helping me, the first premise goes…
“You're standing on the surface of the Earth. You walk one mile south, one mile west, and one mile north. You end up exactly where you started.
Where are you?”
You are obviously at the North Pole. After further thought, you realize that this works anywhere on the planet. Any square that is formed on a sphere (definition of square being all 90* angles) has 3 sides. This introduces premise 2…
“On any spherical geometry, following the edges of a 3 sided square will always result in the return to the original point in 2 (90*) turns”
Because of this we can reasonably infer that this would work on any spherical geometry, including earth, at any scale. If we define a distance for each of the legs of our triangle as x and then take the limit as 1/x goes to infinity, we see smaller and smaller 3 sided triangles (which are navigable) are produced. With this logic, we can claim that standing anywhere on a sphere and walking x distance, turning 90* walking x distance, then turning 90* and walking x distance, will result in you standing in the same spot as you started. This should work for even the smallest possible distances as we proved earlier.
Yet in practice it doesn’t… this might seem jarring after we mathematically proved it. To anyone who doubts that this doesn’t, I challenge you to get into your car and repeat the process for any given distance, I guarantee you won’t end at your starting point. If you can’t drive currently, then go into an open room in your house and try it with distance x = 2 meters.
The point is it doesn’t work even after it mathematically should. Why is this? As a pure math guy, I immensely struggle to see why this doesn’t work.
Lmaooo
have a fun but light differential geometry question for anyone interested in helping me, the first premise goes…
“You're standing on the surface of the Earth. You walk one mile south, one mile west, and one mile north. You end up exactly where you started.
Where are you?”
You are obviously at the North Pole. After further thought, you realize that this works anywhere on the planet. Any square that is formed on a sphere (definition of square being all 90* angles) has 3 sides. This introduces premise 2…
“On any spherical geometry, following the edges of a 3 sided square will always result in the return to the original point in 2 (90*) turns”
Because of this we can reasonably infer that this would work on any spherical geometry, including earth, at any scale. If we define a distance for each of the legs of our triangle as x and then take the limit as 1/x goes to infinity, we see smaller and smaller 3 sided triangles (which are navigable) are produced. With this logic, we can claim that standing anywhere on a sphere and walking x distance, turning 90* walking x distance, then turning 90* and walking x distance, will result in you standing in the same spot as you started. This should work for even the smallest possible distances as we proved earlier.
Yet in practice it doesn’t… this might seem jarring after we mathematically proved it. To anyone who doubts that this doesn’t, I challenge you to get into your car and repeat the process for any given distance, I guarantee you won’t end at your starting point. If you can’t drive currently, then go into an open room in your house and try it with distance x = 2 meters.
The point is it doesn’t work even after it mathematically should. Why is this? As a pure math guy, I immensely struggle to see why this doesn’t work.
@stray turret shut UP
Bro plz stop
@stray turret I told you to stop posting here
(that was roketto lol, not gonna take the credit)
That was epic
Anyway, this has been dog shit lol… everyone have a good night!
.close
Closed by @pale mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
think about the question i sent you...
The original east west question was a rhetorical one to lead the reader into thinking about 3 sided squares
You should post this on the Math Stack Exchange rather than here. The question is quite long. And Discord is designed to be more quick.
True
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find volume?
What have you tried?
Alright
this my first time doing this so not much
Think about this 2 dimensionally first
ok
We have a rectangle on top of a triangle
If we solve for the area of the rectangle and triangle then multiply it by 9 we get our volume
Does that help so far?
kinda
Where are u stuck
volume
Area is 2d and volume is 3d
For example, if I have a square inch of something, I can place that on a price of paper
Yet if I have a cubic inch, it takes up physical space
So for the house, we see the rectangle is 8m by 7m by 9m, what is the volume of the box?
508
504
@silver quartz Has your question been resolved?
can you solve it for reference
@silver quartz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! Ive been doing proofs but have been struggling. This is the problem on a clean pdf, I have already done the Understand the Problem and Make a Plan, however, for the Solve the Problem (Statements and Reasoning) I think my answer is incorrect. Please let me know how to fix it :))
This is what I have for my proof so far.
@ripe comet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
hi
hello, do you know how to solve?
@ripe comet Has your question been resolved?
no but I’ll keep trying myself
Closed by @ripe comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What did I do wrong?
I am basing my answer on this example that my teacher did in class
@ivory olive Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ivory olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
common denominator of the numerator and then (a/b)/c = (a/bc)
ok look at the numerator first
1/(x+h) - 1/x
slap that into one fraction by finding a common denominator
how do you find the common denominator? (x+h) x = x (x+h) right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-Y0Kvcnw8g , I would suggest knowing how to do that before looking at first principles of derivatives
i do
i probably just forgot
but let me watch that video asap
okay i remember
let me try it
okay i got x-(x+h)/x(x+h)
clarkie.
what do you mean
by rotating the top fraction?
no, (a/b)/c = a/(bc)
multiplication is associative and commutative which means if we were to take x = (a/b)/c , then that implies xc = a/b or (xc)b=a, which can then be written as x(bc)=a or just x=a/(bc)
hmm okay
how does this become the 3rd part?
by simplifying with what I just wrote
your a is x-(x+h) , b would be x(x+h), and c would obviously just be h
okay let me take a look
oh
so what you basically did is you multiplied b with the numerator and denominator?
sure
okay lets continue to the 4th part
thats just distribution and simplification
yeah i see it now lmao
let me just do it then if i get stuck ill come back here
okay im good
but i have one last question

when do i know when to use the first principle of dervatives?
like if i told you to differantiate f(x) = 1/x
you won't use the first principle
it's used for proofs
like proofing the product rules and chain rules
or trying to prove that d/dx x^n = nx^n-1
or prove that d/dx sinx = cosx
Closed by @chilly quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Sorry bout that
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can you identify a 30 60 90 triangle without any angle values?
calculate the angles using trigonometry
sidelengths have a specific ratio
Rust Oynuyorsanız MUTLAKA Bilmeniz Gerekenler! videosuna hoşgeldiniz iyi seyirler diliyorum.Bu tarz videolara devam mı edeyim yoksa gameplay videoları mı çekeyim yorumlarda belirtirseniz ona göre devam etmeyi planlıyorum. Ayrıca videoyu beğendiyseniz beğenmenizi rica ediyorum.
?
Don't clog help channels with yt links
ok, heres the question for refrence
im supposed to solve for a
which, according to the 30 60 90 rule, is 4.5 X sqrt3
unfortunately none of the answer choices come up
<@&286206848099549185>
9/25 is the slope
no its the slope
it has 36% slope
then the version without ramp 0% slope
36% slope means 36% slipped down
so what would be A then?
It was 90 degrees, if it slides down 36%, then we have 90-32,4 degrees?
lol
b = 57,6° and a = 32,4°?
sin(32,4) = 4,5/x
x = hypotenus
wow it is
it got complicated
..
did we make a mistake
what does the commas stand for
ohhhh
do you understand
buttttt, the answer choices dont make sense
yes
dont know
oh nvm solved it
since the rise in the slope is 9
and the value of B, aka the rise of the ramp is4.5
multiply by 2
just devide 25 by 2
and you get 12.5
alr
Closed by @grand falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
9/25 slope
slope
the slope is merely a ratio
if the true height is 4.5
and the rise factor of the slope is 9
as in 9/25
the slope can also be 4.5/12.5
yes
because 4.5/12.5 as a fraction is equal to 9/25
but how did you reconcile the slope with the length
so A, which is the x value of the slope
is12.5
as you can see in the diagram
the triangle is the slope
yes
the length of b, which we know as 4.5, is the y value of the slope
and the y value of the slope is 9, in 9/25
what is the y value
How do you know
according to the picture i sent
the length of b is the y value
How would you respond if someone said to you that "the hypotenuse is the slope i think"?
yes
thehypotenuse is the slope
wait
lol
hold up
okay
b is the y value
we know that
and a is the x value
so apparently the pythagoremtheorem
okay but b/a is not hypotenus
okay
screw the hypotenuse
we are solving for a, the horizontal line
so since 9 is the y value of the slope
ok but the slope is 9/25
and 25 is the x factor
not b/a
but the triangle itself is acting as the slope
How, is the bottom base of the triangle slope?
now i draw you any triangle
Can we say that the short right side divided by the long right side is equal to the hypotenuse?
so it doesent matter
because we can expand the same shape
and we can get different lengths with the same angles, right?
I think we should focus on the angles, I don't know if I'm right..
itsn ot about the angles
its about the side lengths
in this contexxt
the side lengths are all we get
we dont get any angles besides one, and that one is a right angle
we know the vertical side of the right triangle is equal to 4.5 feet
which in the slope is equal to 9, as in 9/25
since the slope is a ratio, we can assume that 9/25 is also equal to 4.5/12.5
which according to the side length of B, the vertical side, is congruent
so since we know that the vertical side length is 4.5
the horizontal side length we are solving for, a, is 12.5
SIDE LENGTH SLOPE
vertical=4.5 Vertical=9
Horizontal=12.5 Horizontal=25
slope, once again, is a ratio
notice how, if you devide the vertical of the slope by 2, you can acheive the side length
consequently, wecan do the same for the horizontal
@heady egret
yup
what is hypotenus?
okay but what is 9/25
ther ratio
so I don't understand how the short side divided by the long side gives the slope
it can be the opposite
