#help-0
1 messages · Page 218 of 1
you're not trying to find one solution, you're trying to find a range of solutions
i'd assume
i know that but how do i said it
you can certainly use this property for 93 and 94
by getting the numerators as 1
for question no 96 i got value like -3,-2,-2/3 all greater then equal to what should i do?
no wait just greater then
x > -3, x > -2 & x > -2/3
i didn't use that property in that question isn't x should be in the middle so i just solved by multiplying by x^2
you can use that property though
like by dividing through the whole inequality to get 0<1/a<1/b
give me a minute to process
well
you can do the same as divide through everything by 2
to get the first fraction as 1 in the numerator
one quick queston
then by 3 to get the second fraction as a 1 in in numeator
can we do 2 * 1/x < 3/5
2*X < 3/5 ?
close
is it in form of 1/a if we divide by 2 i mean to say
the left side is in the correct form, but the right isnt
do u understand what i did in the pic
yessir
this is correct
if we take right hand side value to left hand side then?
you can combine the fractions but i think it'd be easier to do this way
okay i give up
teach me
I think it would be easier to use the following : if $a < b < 0$, then $\frac{1}{b} < \frac{1}{a} < 0$
rafilou2003
You can start back from this line here
The 2nd line
thats your teachers job :)
self-studying
no a math book
Let's go back to $\frac{1}{3x+5} \leq -\frac{3}{2} < 0$
rafilou2003
okay
That's brave
been a two months
i mean try khan academy
Ok, I don’t know if you've seen this rule with inequalities before, but this is an important rule :
i have account but video and exercise are to passive this book have tons of question and well written
okay
If $a \leq b < 0$, then $\frac{1}{b} \leq \frac{1}{a} < 0$
rafilou2003
yeah I get that
1/2 > 1/4
Yeah but be careful this is when both a and b are of the same sign
explain
This rule only works if either both a and b are positive or they are both negative
okay
Can you think of an example where this rule becomes false ?
oh so that why < 0 and > 0 are there
For example, a = -1, b = 1
i got so that 0 at the end is it for that reason ?
a < b, however 1/a < 1/b
Yes
okay
if they are of same sign
Let's now apply this rule to here
I took example a = -1 and b = 1 so in this case it didn't work
Now, can you apply the rule we just saw to this ?
they are of same sign since they both are less then zero
but there is -3/2 do we have to somehow make it -1/2 ?
okay then b?
rafilou2003
What can we deduce from this ?
so
$$ \frac{1}{\frac{-3}{2}} \leq 3x+5 < 0 $$
something like that
never use latex before : PP
JXHN
Yes
$$ \frac {-2} {3} \leq 3x+5 < 0 $$
Nice
JXHN
now we just solve for x?
yeah but be around here I still have some doubt that i am unable to clear out but first let me solve this
$$ \frac {-2}{3} - 5 \leq 3x < -5 $$
$$ \frac{-2-15}{3} \leq 3x < -5 $$
$$ \frac{-17}{9} \leq x < -5/3 $$
JXHN
okay i think this just about right even if it's not in standard form of inequality
It is correct !
@pallid scarab i just realized the problem we have don is 92 but there is < 0 did we just have to added it according to our intutative?
intuation(i can't spell it)
The problem if you don’t add the < 0 is that you would lose information
When you solve inequalities like this, you have to work your way with equivalences, the symbols that look like "<=>"
This symbol means that we can freely go one way or the other without losing information
hmm i don't get it what are u saying
anyway one of my friend here in server have me taught another that was not in my book but your process seems helpful since i was able to use the thing from the book that i learned
- Ann
anyway x is already in middle here
question no 93,94,95,96
This is another way
i understood that process but gave me lot of confusion since i didn't learn that way
intersection something
as i was saying all x are in middle and there is another property here should we seprate the inequality and solve them separately
i did that and got many value
Here is a better property that gives you more information :
If 0 < a < b, then 0 < 1/b < 1/a
If a < b < 0, then 1/b < 1/a < 0
for question no 96 i got value like x > -3, x > -2 & x > -2/3 in this case what should i do
but this is done onely to take x(unknown range) in middle right?
and then solving it
for the question i am doing all are in middle
or am i being dumb please continue explaining if u want
u are really helpful
Well I'm sure you could apply this property I just showed you to exercices 93-96
You just have to let a = ... and b = ... the correct values
correct values?
Weird, for number 96 I find x > -1
Let's do it together to find out what went wrong
So we start with $0 < \frac{1}{3x+6} < \frac{1}{3}$
rafilou2003
let me do some step
Try to use this useful tool
$$ 0 < 3x+6 < 3 $$
JXHN
JXHN
Correct!
do we know 3x is negative or postive?
since it < 0 it have to negative rightL
$$ 0 < 3 - 3x < 6 $$
JXHN
$$ -3 < -3x < 6 -3 $$
JXHN
$$ 1 > x > -3 $$
JXHN
@pallid scarab i think i did some mistake somewhere i don't know where this is heading
This was correct, why did you subtract x ?
From here you can subtract 6 and then divide by 3
so,
$$ -2 < -1 < x $$
JXHN
JXHN
i want to take it middle to solve it
It isn't always the case
suppose the i have two inequality and solving in one big horizontal line if i want to add +3 to any side do i have to add it on all side?
Yes
Closed by @real cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The cosine is confusing me is it $\cos{\frac{\pi}{2}}\times(t-2)$?
based off the assumption that the stick is submerged at midnight since idk how tides work, you should be able to just solve for t by plugging in 72 for d
okay cosine is like that but same thing should hold true, plug in d and solve for t
I got something around 3.9 but I don't think that's quite right if the wave is traveling to the right
@rigid fog Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried solving like this, is it correct?
@trail cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what happens in the final line? i dont get how they get the vector eqn
@last saddle Has your question been resolved?
q = 2
@last saddle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@last saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @last saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this for x and y? I tried to use sin58 to get x value but it was clearly wrong any suggestions?
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
it stucks at ×=10/sin58 I tried to get sin58 to get x value
Because you set up the equation wrong
Do you know SOH CAH TOA?
Like can you set up the proper equation?
you mean opposite/hypotenuse
Yes
So you know that sin theta = opp/hyp, correct?
correct
If you fill in what you know, what is the equation?
sin58=×/10 , I want to find x so it should be 10 times sin58 right?
I dont know the value of sin58
Use a calculator
8.5 ish then
Yes
.close
I did same thing as before but couldnt solve it is there something different?
,tex .sohcahtoa
riemann
identify the adjacent side to angle = 31
I tried this but I get like 0.33 for y value
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
,calc 5/sin(59 deg)
Result:
5.8331669860767
,calc 5/sin(59)
Result:
7.8525232418039
i have no idea how you get 0.33
but also you used the wrong trig function
read this again
and answer this question
@visual zealot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was doing this problem, and thought I had the right answer.
I got this
However
The judge said that the answer was 2-cbrt8y instead of just cbrt8y, and I don't know why.
picture of graph^
The shell is a cylinder with radius y, and height 2 - ³√(8y)
One side of the cylinder touches the green line, the other side touches the blue curve. So, we need the length between those two.
That's where 2 - ³√(8y) comes in
how is the height 2 - ³√(8y)?
i just dont understand where the 2 comes from.
Oh wait
it's the x=2
and it doesnt affect the bounds, since those are just 0 to 1
is this an accurate representation of why?
Perfect
Closed by @daring eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello everyone, I'm seeking methodical advice, more specifically I'm reading Serge Langs calculus book (its worth mentioning that Im calculus beginner - i understand some important concepts but calculus-computation-wise im a beginner) And i stumbled upon a practice problem which says " Prove the following inequalities for all numbers x, y. 22. |x+y| ≥ |x| - |y| [Hint: Write x = x + y- y, and apply Theorem 2.3, together with the fact that |-y| = |y|. Theorem 2.3: |x+y| ≤ |x| + |y| " My question is: how should I approach this problem/how should I go about proving/disproving it?
I would like to understand each step and logic behind each step so I can replicate the same logic as I continue reading
I tried bunch of nonsense thats probably not even worth mentioning since I doubt it classifies as "my work" but I tried squaring both sides, i tried subtracting and even splitting into two equations
Where am i stuck? at the beginning, I have no idea how to begin solving the question. One of the things I tried and forgot to mention is that I posted the question into ChatGPT chatbox and I found out that it sucks at basic arithmetics and generates logical fallacies like " 1 ≥ -1, is not true therefore |x+y| ≥ |x| - |y| does not hold for all x,y in R"
Its worth mentioning that I understood everything clearly, prior to this practice problem in the book, even the proof of previously mentioned Theorem 2.3 and absolute value axioms
this is equivalent to solving |x| \leq |x+y| + |y|
might make it easier to see why their hint is useful
could you please rewrite the equation since i dont understand the "\leq" parameter
$|x| \leq |x+y| + |y|$
michαel
use the first hint on the |x| part
hmm surprisingly i did not think about this possiblity, thank you very much for pointing me the correct direction i will give it a go surely.
.close
Closed by @astral lion
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
?
Closed by @tacit arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
6
please expand on that

Has anyone ever actually said 6 to this before? How do we go from here

1
there was that mom that was getting answers for their kid lol
first principle means chain rule correct
no
oh
No, means the limit definition
It is that, haha
oh
With a lim on the beginning of it
And over an h
So it's kinda like that. A little bit.
Yes that looks right
ok is the answeer 1/sqrt 2x +1
are those all the correct steps
I was under the impression you didn't send all of your work
I mean as long as you know what each step is doing, you're good
alright thanks
@verbal harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @verbal harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with this
i got to here
what do you want to do with the derivative next
What info have you been given instead of points
horizontal
means x = 0
no
what
that's not what horizontal means
That is a point
That’s a point
Not a line
,w horizontal
What can you tell me about the slope of a horizontal line
oop
yes
so i put 0 = 2cosx(1+sinx)
now i solve for 2cosx and 1+sinx
yes probably
i get (pi/2 , y) ( -pi/2,y)
if by solve for them you mean what I think
how do i get the y
what did you do?
ah
= pi/2
I see
Note that cos and arccos are not exactly the same
Arccos is only defined for the principle domain
Those are indeed only some of the points
What do you know these points have to satisfy?
can you explain this point
wdym
That’s exactly what we’re about to do
You’ve found the x value by constraining “the tangent line needs a slope of 0”
What other constraint do the points have?
oh you mean they exist at each 2npi?
@grizzled zephyr Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hmm try using the addition formula for tan ( x + pi/4 )
you also didnt get anything wrong
you can evaluate sin(pi/4)
you can evaluate trig functions when given a value
what is tan(pi/4)?
You can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of 1 - tanx
1 + tan x
When you multiply you should get (tan x + 1) (1 + tan x) / (1 - tan x) (1 + tan x)
you can simplify the numerator and denominator
You can simplify to get (tan x + 1 + tan^2 x + tan x) / (1 - tan^2 x)
did you not just evalute tan(pi/4)
Closed by @hollow wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I begin proving this? This has to do with Euler's Theorem: phi(n) is the number of relatively prime numbers between 1 and n
And phi(n) can be calculated by $\phi(n) = n(1 - \frac{1}{p_1}) \cdots (1 - \frac{1}{p_r})$, where each p is a prime factor of n.
Minighost
So, it makes sense intuitively that each p prime factor would come in a pair... But how do I prove that?
I will be working on some other problems in the meantime, please ping me if you respond!
Yes!
ok
so a factorization of totient(n) would be as you showed above
one thing we can do is break down the factors of n and distribute them into the other factors to clear the denominators
are you following so far?
Yes, I think so...
for example, totient(12)=12(1-1/2)(1-1/3)
so we can take a factor of 2 and 3 and distribute them in
you get 2(2-1)(3-1)
which gets you 4
does that example make sense?
I think so? You make 12 into 2 * 2 * 3, then distribute 2 and 3 into the other terms?
yes
Ok!
one thing you notice is it makes the expression $(n_{new})(p_1-1)(p_2-1)...$ for any number
GarlicBredFries
with p_n being prime
you can take this even further by writing $n=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}...$
GarlicBredFries
do you know what that would make n_new?
Woah, wait, how'd you get to the $n=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}...$?
Minighost
Did you mean writing n_new like that?
GarlicBredFries
if you think about it, any prime must be used once in order to clear the denominators
Once you do that, n_new will be whatever's left after taking all the prime factors out of the original n.
Wouldn't that also be a prime?
it wouldnt be a prime
it would also be written as prime factors
each prime factor is used once to clear denominators
so $n_{new}$ would look like $p_1^{a_1-1}p_2^{a_2-1}...$
GarlicBredFries
Wait, you mean like, we're now at $\phi(n) = n_{new} (p_1 - 1)(p_2 - 1)...$, but $n_{new}$ is equal to what you just typed?
Minighost
I don't know.
There has to be an odd number of factors?
Oh! All of its factors divide 3! (Or, at least, all p_i - 1 | 3, for all i = 1..k)
Man, that took me way too long to realize...
Ok, I think I got the proof done.
.close
Closed by @mighty berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So you know the arc length is 8.73 in and the radius is 10 in. Is there perhaps a formula for the angle?
formula isnt provided
Mhm. But there is one.
there is
Yes.
what class is this for?
ok perhaps this formula is in your notes?
nope
is it the angle sector formula
yes
ok
ok
but if you are trying to find the the angle can you manipulate the formula a little bit to give you what you want?
so intuitively, that shouldn't make sense
ya
493 is more than a 360 degree circle
yup
ok
how did you get 493
um 8.73/20*pi is not 1.4
8.73/20pi is not 1.4
let me do that again
also is this supposed to be in radians or degrees
20 * pi is a bit more than 60
so 1.4/(20pi) should be a small number close to 1.4/60
aka if you're getting anything larger than 1 then something went wrong
so it's first doing (8.73 / 20) then multiplying by pi
you need to do 8.73 / (20 * pi)
Closed by @chilly idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I got this wrong on geometry test
I was trying to prove its a trap because only 1 set of paralell sides / same slope
Now im forgeting how to get the slope on that
This feedback doesnt help me at all
Wouldnt the slope for QU be 3/5?
if not how would I find it
y2-y1
6-9=-3
it would be odd to have positive slope for QU when its going down right
yes
it technically is but i like looking at it that way
do you mind helping me with another?
I thought I got this one right I just didnt do it the simple way
I know how to do distance formula but wouldnt I still be correct?
oh i thought you were asking that i havent read your thing 2 sec
yes but dont convert to decimals
alr thanks for the help im going to see if he can change my grade
$\sqrt{40}^2+\sqrt{10}^2=40+10=50$
Køter
and then sqrt(50) ofc
sure you can do that
seems kind of odd yea to grade that wrong if they didnt explicitally ask for distance formula
so when it says simplest radical form I can say $\sqrt{49.999}
oh nvm simplest radical form
its not sqrt(49.999) though its just because you converted to decimal midway
which you should never do btw
its sqrt(50)
.close
Closed by @fast lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@feral sonnet i never heard of simplest radical form before so i just looked it up
apparently it you cant have a square number as a factor in the radicand
so sqrt(50) is not simplest radical form
because 50=25 * 2 and 25 is a square number
would it be 5sqrt2
Closed by @fast lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How should I start this?
Do you know what f'(x) is
derivative
and you know how to find the derivative of a function right?
yeah
But finding f’(x) and f’(-1) are different things right
because $$f(x)$$ is not $$f'(x)$$
Brandon H
If they're not the same how would they be the same?
sin(pi/2)?
is f'(pi/2) = sin(pi/2)?
of course not
f'(x) = cos(x)
f'(pi/2) = cos(pi/2)
$f'(x) \neq f(x)$
riemann
maybe it's easier for you to understand that if it's on one line with a not equals sign
but here if I’m just finding f’(-1) all I do is sub in -1 for x?
what is the derivative of
$$f(x)=2x^5-7x^3+5x-4$$
Brandon H
Yes
yes. into the derivative
that's why this was asked
then this was instructed
order matters
Closed by @wheat isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @final sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've been trying to solve this but im really stuck, I need help
It's been hours and i'm not joking
What is the question!
I have to prepare this for inverse laplace
I can't find a way to modify the denominator properly
Partial Fraction Decomposition?
You have to do that
But before that, you need to find the poles of your transfer function
there should be a way to turn it to that
yeah yeah, you have a third order system
I see
I'll check that out thanks
Do you know how to solve 0.5 s^3 + 1.5 s² + s = 0
To determine the poles
Okay try!
not really
I've realized that im extremely rusty
at basic algebra
like factorization and stuff
No no haha
It's third degree polynomial
No formula
Well, there is, but too complicated to be used
So, we look for trivial roots
oh I see
substitute by values like 0, -1, 1, 2, -2
Maybe you get lucky and find a root
Then you factorize
3rd degree polynomial = 1st degree polynomial * 2nd degree polynomial
Does this ring any bells?
Allright, I'll let you work a little
Focus on finding the poles
We'll talk about the partial fraction later
ok, thank you so much
@rain kraken Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $F$ be a field, and $a\in F$, with $a\ne0$. If $n\in\mathbb{Z}^+$, prove that $a^{-n}=(a^n)^{-1}$
Platinum_Saber
1/a^n?
@mint glen Has your question been resolved?
But isn't division defined to be multiplication with the multiplicative inverse
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tardy quartz Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed due to the original message being deleted
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would I start this questions
let the equation of your double-tangent line be y = ax + b
you want the equation x^4 + 2x^3 - 7x^2 + 11 = ax + b to have two double roots
since this is a 4th degree equation, and two double roots counted with multiplicity already gives 4, you can say for sure that there are no more roots
so x^4 + 2x^3 - 7x^2 - ax + 11 - b = (x-r)^2 (x-s)^2
Expand the right hand side and compare by power of x: this gives you equations for a,b,r,s. For example, the term proportional to x^3 gives you the equation 2= -2(r+s). The term proportional to x^2 gives you -7 = r^2 + 4 r * s + s^2 etc.
,w solve {2 == -2 (r + s), -7 == 4 r s + s^2 + r^2, -a == -2 r^2 s - 2 s^2 r,
11 - b == r^2 s^2}
@noble notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @noble notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's wrong with my answer?
Closed due to the original message being deleted
what's wrong with my answer?
idk why they expect me to do 14.5cos(2pi(t-206/365))+63.5
what's the difference if the results are the same
Did you notice that t is to be measured in years, not in days?
well I guess the period IS defined as "1 year"
smh.. lol
.close
.close
weird
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@grizzled garden Has your question been resolved?
@grizzled garden Has your question been resolved?
clarify the question first
Closed by @grizzled garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! Need some help on an integral for sin^3x dx using u=cosx thanks!
.close
Closed by @safe tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone walk me through step by step on how to do this please
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
i just did it so that another helper doesnt have to ask
idk how to solve ur problem, sorry
what does each integral mean
idk
if you were to read it out in english
i still dont know
the first one is the area under the curve from -3 to 6
yes
and so on
i dont really understand what im supposed to find
it tells me
idk how to solve actually
@copper delta?
the area under the curve from -3 to 6 = area from -3 to 0 + area from 0 to 3 + area from 3 to 6
you have everything to solve now
what do i do with the numbers
5+2+x = 10
7 - 10?
oh
7 + x = 10
so x = 10 - 7?
that would be 3 but the answer is suppose to be -3
how do i get -3
$\int^3_0 f(x) dx= 3$
Poelymole
lmao yeh mb
lol
but we have $\int^0_3 f(x) dx$
Poelymole
which is kinda like the inverse
huh
cus ur question sucks
not in my hands
ok idk if this will help but the top one would be found as $\int f(3)-\int f(0)$ but the bottom one is $\int f(0) - \int f(3)$
obviously +c but we dont care
Poelymole
shouldnt the answer be 3
wait no
-3 because a = 3 and b = 0 right?
it would be 3 if the numbers were switched?
a = 0 b = 3
this question is so dumb
if the question wasnt a trick question it would be 3 but bc they switched the top and bottom in that last integral the answer is -1x3 = -3
so because its switched, the answer is -3 but if it was normal, it would be 3
yep exactly
wow
hence
do you think you can help me with another question
try me
ok immediately i want to get rid of that root x at the bottom
$\frac{x-1}{\sqrt{x}} = \frac{x\sqrt{x}-1\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}\sqrt{x}}$
Poelymole
holy
so yeah times top and bottom by root x
imo ignore that for the moment
rearrange to make it nicer
then try and integrate
bc x-1/sqrt(x) is an awful thing to integrate
if it were me i would be removing the root x from the bottom ofthe fraction by timesing top and bottom by root x
so does the bottom cancel out
to make x yep
so its just x - 1?
$\frac{x\sqrt{x}}{x} - \frac{1\sqrt{x}}{x}$
Poelymole
x * x^1/2 = 2x^1/2?
no
x^3/2
1sqrtx is just sqrt x right
i have ((x^3/2) - (x^1/2)) / x
@serene isle is this right?
and i start getting the antiderivative
i split these into two fractions for a reason
integration is so much simpler if you treat them separately
the first one xs cancel giving just sqrt x
the second root x / x = x^-1/2
((x^3/2)/x) - ((x^1/2)/x)
so overall its just $x^\frac{1}{2} - x^{-\frac{1}{2}}$
Poelymole
and then finding antiderivative is a peice of cake
so bringing the x up makes the exponent subract by 1?
Poelymole
and then now i get the antiderivative right
i got 40/3
at long last
thank god my 6 hour study session is over
6 am
thank you
so much
goodnight
.close
Closed by @weary abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't know where i did wrong
the answer is -6 btw
the solution just canceled the $\frac{81}{4} x^4$ out of no where
yomiko
looks like it’s because they are using small angle approximations, so some things are negligible
in the working out you showed, they keep using ≈
My teacher would have bitten me for writing sin(x) = theta
May I be your teacher?
sure
LoL
i get that x is really small that 81/4 x^4 would be negligible, but that means that -9x^2 is also negligible? no?
In the small angle approximation, higher order terms (like x^3, x^4, etc.) are usually ignored because their contribution becomes negligible for very small x
Yeah, looks like they assumed the x⁴ term to be extremely smol so they neglected it.
in the step where they cross out the fourth power, you can expand it out yourself and see that in the end it is -6 plus some x terms
Yep. What they showed is a bad practice
But what is really happening is
That
They were neglecting all the x² and higher terms
In the end
So like
[(1-9x²+81/4 x⁴)-1]/(3/2 x²)
= (-9x²)/(3/2x²) + (81/4 x⁴)/(3/2 x²)
= -6 + umm 27/2 x²¿
But as x is small, x² is super small ≈ 0
So in the end
≈ -6
This is what I assume your answer provider did
$$ \frac{(1 - \frac92 x^2)^2 - 1}{\frac32 x^2} \newline = \frac{-9x^2 + \frac{81}4 x^4}{\frac32 x^2} $$
l33t_syncopations
After this step, you can divide both numerator and denominator by x^2
And then you get $$-6 + \frac{27}2 x^2$$
l33t_syncopations
oh so $\frac{27x}{2} -6$ x approx = 0 so its just -6
yomiko
Closed by @surreal oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont quite get why this is the result
i thought it would be
is it meant to be dw/dr
what is even the difference between the partial derivative of w and the derivative of w wrt r
@hidden heart Has your question been resolved?
huh
- #❓how-to-get-help
- you can talk about it in the relevant channel, like #get-advanced-access
try in #discussion or #math-discussion , or others
@hidden heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
googling does not seem to give any results
did you have a math problem which used those terms?
no i am simply trying to figure out what that is as its mentioned in my admission course test
can you show the test...?
i havnt given it yet, its part of the course
also wrong channel
ok but theres some kind of written document which mentions these "INS and PNS number systems"
yes?
Provide the image of the text where you saw those terms.
Show the whole context.
are you from pakisthan
I don't see any reason to hide information. Show the whole image.
INS seems to be International Number system , and PNS Pakisthani Number System
last i heard, there is no letter h in the name Pakistan
but also yeah this tells us nothing
Anyone know what the tilted < on m<C= means ?
What does the symbol mean
The help thing said to reply to math 0 which is this tab sry it looks like it’s busy
channel taken, read #❓how-to-get-help
@gaunt gust #❓how-to-get-help
i'm from bordering state of pakistan and we write it rajasthan insted of rajastan
ye
its the symbol of angel
.close
Closed by @turbid wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, does 2a=2nd term
for the equation: tn=an^2+bn+c
Show the original question.
you didn't answer any of my questions...
sorry

