#help-0
1 messages · Page 175 of 1
Closed by @serene junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I am having a difficult time understanding a problem. First we represent a 10 by 10 square and a circle. The circle fits perfectly into the square (Figure 1). Let's say we take off a 1 by 1 cube off of each corner of the square.(Figure 2) The second shape has the same perimeter as the original square. Both have a perimeter of 40. Now let's say I repeat the same process of taking off squares a bunch of times.(Figure 3) It should still have the same perimeter as the original square. If we do this and infinite amount of time to get to the exact shape of the circle wouldn't that mean that both the square and the circle have the same perimeter. Obviously this is wrong, the square has a perimeter of 40 and the circle of 10 x pi but I can't figure out how it's wrong.
But if you do it an infinite amount of time.
it's representing a circle
What do you mean?
the circle is not perfect
but you can understand
Btw the drawings are not precise. I've simply drawn them for better comprehension
yes, I understand them
The process isn't continuous. Taking length and then taking the limit is different from first doing the limit and then taking the length
Could you explain it differently, I am not quite sure I understand what you mean.
When doing stuff infinitely often you can't expect that everything works as nicely as you would hope
As another example, if you take a sequence of rational numbers and take their limit, that limit can be irrational even tho all of the numbers in the sequence are rational
this is similar to trying to find the length of a diagonal by taking smaller steps to the side and up.
i don't know a rigorous way to prove it but basically the reason is that every step you take towards your 'limit' has to change in some way
Ok I think I understand.
if every step is constant then you're not 'correctly' looking for the answer
if that makes any sense
.close
Closed by @oblique meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if y=-x+4 is tangent to y=(x-a)^(2)+3, what is the variable 'a' equal to
Find the derivative of y=(x-a)^2 + 3
Closed by @hazy silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why was n = mi+1 used instead of l = (m-1)i+1 ?
This is the rule:
A full m-ary tree with i internal vertices has n = mi+1 vertices, and l = (m-1)i+1 leaves.
Thus, when m is known and the tree is full, we can compute all four of the values e, i, n, and l, given any one of them.
^ (e)dges, (i)nternal vertices, (n)odes, (l)eaves
I have this:
(3-1)*(100+1) = 2*101 = 202
@floral willow Has your question been resolved?
@floral willow Has your question been resolved?
@floral willow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to find the volume of the specified area while it rotates around x=-1
i set up the integral but i think im supposed to include -1 somewhere because of the gap between x=-1 and x=0
idk where im messing up
yea
can you tell which way you need to be integrating?
i mean dy or dx
sometimes these are easier if you sort the direction first, then try to make radius functions
dx
sorry tea
so, so i'd think of these as inner and outer radius
does that make sense?
your inner radius is where the volume "starts" as you head outwards from x=-1
and the outer radius is where it "stops"
yeah, inner being from x=-1 to x=0 and then outer from x=-1 to x=2?
sort of
first off radius is always positive
if i told you inner radius is 1, does that make sense?
yea
as in, if you rotate this thing
you have to go 1 distance to reach where the solid shape begins
from -1
the outer radius isnt so easy, its a function of x, right
right
if we start at x=-1 but y=0, itll be a different radius, than if we start at x=-1 but y=2
but you know some things about it
like at y=8, its 1
wwhat should it be at y=0?
3?
wait so
when we say x is the distance from rectangle
is it from the rectangle to the y axis
or all the way to the axis we rotate upon
cause if its to the y axis then it would be x+1 correct?
oh wait am i doing the dy way 
i thi nk thats where i messed up
sorry im kinda sleepy 
no youre good haha i think i just solved my own question
take two cylinders
height 8
one radius 1 and one radius 3
concentric
less the volume of the 1 radius from the 3
then divide it by 2
thats your answer
yes be sure
which is uhh
80pi/3 is what i got for volume
$\frac{8(\pi \cdot3^2-\pi\cdot 1^2)}{2}$
nice answer
jan Niku
fÀf
@buoyant pulsar Has your question been resolved?
and here me trying to be half as good as you
i figured its $\pi\int _0 ^8 \qty(1-\frac y4 )^2 \dd y$
jan Niku
I got the same answer as Dariush tho
although I'd like for someone to confirm cuz we both may have done the same mistake 
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone please show me how to integrate ln x, this is what I have so far and I think its wrong
uv-vdu
you accidentally did uv-dvdu
(sorry, i don't know how to use the rich text bot here)
it would be xln(x) - int(1)dx
= xln(x) - x
ach no
sorry
It's okay
yep
i got confused there because you wrote v = int(dx)
i normally write dv instead of v for that step
I understand my mistake now, but could you please tell me how you would solve it?
Like
I feel like I get so messy
because really this is only one part of a bigger question
instead you just wrote x
Do I need to do by parts twice here?
what is the upper bound there?
e^2
gotcha. let me do this one myself real quick
Thank you!
also, is that the natural log cubed of sqrtx or the natural log of the cube root of x
x^(1/3)
gotcha
okay. let me see if i can work this rich text bot real quick
forgive me if i mess this up
$1/3intxlnx$
well that didn't work
I did integration by parts twice, but not sure if it was necessary
Yes I learned that today, but tbh I don't know what is really considered what
Like
What is x?
From liate
alright. LIATE is the order for which you choose u for integration by parts
Yes
x is algebraic
Ohh
for this, u would be ln(x)
and not x
Would u be ln x^(1/3)?
Ohh
to just 1/3lnx
yeah
Thank you so much
np
no problem. should be fairly quick now that the u's and dv's are good.
Yes, thank you again
@ivory gull Has your question been resolved?
How can I make this
Look like this?
I know I have to factor out a 1/4
But because there is that e^4
It makes me confused a bit
Nvm I think if I just get the common denominator it will be clear to me
lmao im so stupid
.close
Closed by @ivory gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone give me the answer to all the questions with solution...
they're all just finding the area of the separate shapes and either adding or subtracting
Yo can you show the solutions? From number 1 to number 3 with answers im pretty confused with our topic on math rn...
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@spare moss Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can I please get some help on this question
(this question is in the topic of proofs- math ext 2 year 12-australia)
also this one pls
okay so are you generally familiar with the structure of an induction proof?
yes
so what will your base case be?
1?
wait, can we please look at this question first please?
yep, since we're showing this for positive integers n. can you verify that the base case works when n = 1?
ok sure
thanks
what are you not sure about on that one?
I am not quite sure where to start
is it possible for you to write (hand write in fine) me a working out so I can ask questions to you within the working out?
sure
so what inequality could be useful here, when comparing two sides of a triangle to the third?
"triangle inequality" should ring a bell
yeah yeah, that one
the one with absolute values
oh right, so we start with this one?
yeah, this means that the sum of two sides of a triangle is always greater than the third side (if the three points aren't collinear)
here, what are the candidates for longest side?
not sure
well it definitely can't be $log_{10}(19)$ right
lyra
depending on $n$, would you agree that the longest side has length either $log_{10}67$ or $log_{10}n$
lyra
?
$log{10}n$?
Mastermind_879
wouldn't this be just the question
đ¶ is it possible for you to this for me?
đ sorry for my lack of knowledge at my own school topic
no need to apologize
can you write a handwritten/typed working out for me?
yeah working on it
thank you
thanks, I will try it out
sounds good, let me know what you get
@limber vapor Has your question been resolved?
yeah, I was able to find it đ„č
but since N is an integer but N>67/19
but 67/19 is not an integer
is the possible values just all the integers inbetween them
thank you for helping me with this question btw
can you maybe help me with this one now, if you're not busy
yes, you just want to find the integers n that satisfy this - it's fine if the bounds aren't integral, just take the least/greatest integers that do satisfy them and everything in between
sure i can help w that
so we said base case is n = 1. can you check that this works?
in theory it wouldn't work, and log 1 is 0
why's log coming into the picture? we just want to check if the formula proposed in the question works for n = 1, i.e. take the first derivative of sin ax and check that it is equal to the right-hand side
how would I try it out without knowing what constant "a" is?
(general question, not meaning to say it isn't possible)
well it doesn't matter what a is to find the derivative of sin ax (it will depend on a, but that's fine)
oh
I don't think it is
the answer is negative to the original thing... I might have made a mistake
as far as I know cos(x+90) doesn't equal to sin(x)
did I make a mistake?
well on the right-hand side you'll get a*sin(ax + 90), which simplifies to what?
a*cos( ax)
yep, and that's also the form we want from the derivative right
OH
but it is still neg to what we want tho
how? the derivative of sin ax is a*cos(ax), which lines up with what you got
brain fart. yes. you're right
lmao all good
okay so now we can carry out the induction step: how would you set this up?
in this why are we not considering log 67 + log n> log 19
sorry to disturb you guys but I had that doubt
assume true for n=k
then prove true for n=k+1
or do you mean for me to write the actual thing
not sure how true your statement is
but even if it is true, this lovely helper already presented enough to answer the question
as in you want me to write it?
log 67 is already greater than log 19, so this is true for any n
i think this would help yeah
okay
oh thnx man
really sorry to disturb you guys again but I just wanna check the final answer of this question. Mine is coming out to be 1270
sorry for the wait btw, just working on it
@desert crane I am stuck on proving k+1 is true
I tried differentiating f^k(x) to get to it to prove it
but am having trouble, am I going towards the right direction?
@limber vapor Has your question been resolved?
resolved
do you want to learn multiplication with the fast fourier transform
yes pls
@limber vapor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @limber vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my solution wrong?
In this section we will continued examining sequences. We will determine if a sequence in an increasing sequence or a decreasing sequence and hence if it is a monotonic sequence. We will also determine a sequence is bounded below, bounded above and/or bounded.
I used the method here at the last example
Why do you think its wrong
It looks fine to me
they give you this checklist.
You could re-state the boundary over which the sequence decreases.
But It also increases over second boundary, which you should add.
@true sandal Has your question been resolved?
where do you get this
from the webpage you linked. paul's online notes
why is it blue
it might be because of my addon that forces dark-mode on sites
@true sandal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @true sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
On the first trip, the car spent 0.375 parts of the gasoline that was in the tank and another 5 liters. On the second trip, 80% of the remaining gasoline and the last 4 liters. How many liters of gasoline were in the tank initially
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
yes
yeah so that would be the remaining gasoline after the first trip
20% of that minus 4 liters would be 0
80% of that minus 4 liters would be 0
no to that
So whole solution is
x-0.375x-5-(x-0.375x-5/2)-4=0
can you rewrite it
misplaced (),
don't use cross for multiplication
you want something representing 4/5 being multiplied to the whole x-0.375x-5
not just the -5
x-0.375x-5-(x-0.375x-5) * 4/5-4=0
no i do not
Well I meant u know now then
and solve that equation
Closed by @tulip hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
show that;
ignore the fraction line in the n-1 over k part
i tried expanding everything first,
n!/(n-k)! x k! = (n-1)!/(n-k-1)! x (k-1)! + (n-1)!/(n-1-k)! x k!
does this look correct?
@fierce delta Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fierce delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i find the x intercepts and domain of a sin graph
When is y=0?
First find domain I'd say
alright
how do i know when y=0?
when y=0 x=0 too?
oh like that
and to find the domain what do i do
find the derivative?
why would x=0 when a denominator can't be 0
no clue, just a guess
so, y=0, making it 0=sin(1/x)
and now what do i do to find a domain
a domain is the ~"height" right?
ohh okay
Domain is basically all the values of x for which the graph is not undefined if it correct
how do i find all the values for x
Hmm ok so what value of x would leave the graph undefined or the equation undefined
As u can see itâs 1/x
What would x need to be for 1/x=undefined
y = sin(1/x) oscillates infinitely many times between -1 and 1 as x approaches zero, but it never touches or crosses the x-axis.
The amplitude of the oscillations also increases without bound as x approaches zero.
at x=0 ?
and domain is intuitively all real numbers except for x=0
which means it doesn't have x intercept
The domain would either be in set notation set builder notation if Iâm correct
it does have x intercepts
so essentially its all real numbers excluding 0, written sa (-â, 0) U (0, â) ? (using interval notation.)
Uhh yes I would think so
ye 
Closed by @silver zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do i do
should i take y common or smt?
or should i consider the lcm of their denominators?
y is supposed to be 0 i dont exactly know how
what are you trying to do
find y
factorisation helps
can u see why 0 is a solution?
should i take y common
yeh
its the equation given?
and then what
try writing root{8}y with root{2} denominator
what do you have after taking y common
then you get the answer
just time sqrt 2 on both sides
y = 0 !!!
damn i didn't see that immediately.
Closed by @solar trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this? the answer to b) is "no"
did you get
the answer for a
what is it
ig introduce coordinate, (0,8) is vertex, and one of the point on the graph is (6,0)
@alpine sable now
that you have the answer for a
what you do is
since the truck is 3.9 wide
it means its
0=a(6-0)+8
and find a and expand to get A
sub in 4.8 to the quadratic to find the width of the tunnel at the height
also im pretty sure
As usual, you're not helping
just ignore him he's a troll

you said (0,8) is the vertex, so you know that the quadratic starts from the middle
yet you said (6,0)
and not (3,0)
also, making f(x) = 4.8 is unnecessary
its easier to find the height at the width you have, than finding the width at the height you have
both works
u should prob test both, but one being not fitting is a sufficient condition
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this question?? a ball has a radius that is 5.2mm what is the volume
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
V = (4/3) * Ï * r^3
is the formula
just plug radius in
,w (4/3) * Ï * (5.2 mm)^3
did Mr ou need to help with that one
OP is nowhere to be seen đ»
maybe pi is just rational after all
,calc 590/(5.2^3 * 4/3)
Result:
3.147047109695
588.977413115
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@potent ferry Has your question been resolved?
@potent ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I need help with last question. The answers for the first few questions are
A)The median height: 35cm
B) the first and third quartile are 30cm and 39 cm respectively
C) the 30th percentile is 31cm
D) 4 plants.
I need help with 4 ii)
@turbid root Has your question been resolved?
@turbid root Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There are not many Arabic speaking helpers
unfortunatelyđ
dw im just missinf arounf i dont need actual help thank you though
? Why waste time
trying to find arabic helpers
so we can discuss something
also if ur curious
the problem here is
x^2+4x+4đđ
we're not if you don't need help. just close
.close
Closed by @tacit arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me understand how they got final answer?
Like,.I know they plugged asin(pheta) in for x..
But somehow they got (1-sin^2(pheta)) afterwards
theta* đ
factorization
Shouldnât it be (1-cos^2(theta))
aÂČ-aÂČsinÂČ(theta) = aÂČ(1-sinÂČ(theta))
cosÂČ(theta)+sinÂČ(theta) = 1
cosÂČ(theta) = 1-sinÂČ(theta)
so aÂČ-aÂČsinÂČ(theta) = aÂČcosÂČ(theta)
God Iâm confused on this..
Itâs just factoring trig functions are a pain..
Hold on
How we get 1?
I said you factor
@high wolf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you really shouldn't be mean
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
people say you are how you act when no oneâs looking. just because you think we canât see it doesnât make it ok. consider this a warning
2
provide what you have tried
Could you show what you've got so far?
i like cat
and what your confusion is
i got none
i didnt know what to do
You said you got stick midway 
Anyways, start by calculating how much area do the walls have in total
what do i do to times it
Perhaps it would be nice to know how much area does just one wall have
Any idea on how to get that given each wall is 2.7m high and 4.2m long?
2.7 times 4.2m ????
also this question is weird lmao. Did they include the door part to exclude it or include it with the walls? since I don't see many people painting the doors themselves
But we need to account for the door
so i times
Would be nonsensical to mention the door only to include it
How much area does the door take?
1.6
Right, so we will have to subtract that from this
so 45.36 subtract 1.6=43.76
You should get 43.76
Yeah
So we need to have an area of 43.76m^2
Let's now evaluate how much litres of paint that is
87.52
Each litre of paint can cover 15m^2 of wall, so we will have to divide 43.76 by 15
And, yeah, not multiply
2.197333333333333333
2.197333333333?
Yeah
And since 1.4litres of paint costs 12pounds
Each litre of paint should cost 12/1.4 pounds
okay
Or 60/7 pounds
Meaning we have to multiply what we got by 60/7
And that should be the answer
420
You got 420?
Times 60/7
what is it
ohh
is it 2.19333333 times 60/70 which is fraction
Yeah, 60/7 though
You can just multiply by 60 and then divide by 7 if you are using a calculator
18.8??
You should get 25
so is 25
Yes
ok
Does it show the solution? Cause I don't see what's wrong with my reasoning
no
it just shows answer
so what is answer
@echo socket so its 52.5m times 2
its wrong
how do i do it
its not 105
@echo socket what is it
Tom is applying for a visa.
He has to pay ÂŁ1,500 for the visa as well as a 8% charge on the visa price for an on-the-day service.
If Tom has 1 year to save, how much money should he save per month to be able to cover his costs?
Round your answer to the nearest ÂŁ10.
.close
Closed by @twin haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
â
@twin haven Has your question been resolved?
So how much area needs to be painted?
i dont know
i tried to find out
okay
But we don't want to paint the door
So we remove the area of the door from the total
ok
So 2.4Ă5.2-2Ă0.8
s0 8.384?
That's for the one with the door
Then we have 3 normal walls
Which will just be 3(2.4Ă5.2)
ok
what i do next
So we know one tin is 2 liters and that will cover 24m^2
okay
so 48
or is it 24 squared
if it is so 576
okay
okay
okay
Any questions 
so the answer is 30
I believe so
Where did you get any of these numbers from
9.45
1.62
right?
@twin haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the derivative of ln(x) 1/x ? I'm only asking because desmos doesn't show 1/x when getting the derivative
ln(x) is only defined for x > 0, so the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x for x > 0
but when solving should i just consider it 1/x ?
solving what?
you need to be more specific really
like this
My guy, write down what's correct
finding the derivative
well that function is defined for all $x \neq 0$
ÎŁAC
well obviously there x can be less than 0
Yes this is the so called natural domain of defintion
The domain and codomain are part of the definition of a function
Which is not specified here but that's fine
Closed by @celest stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
why did they multiply 12 and 80
12(lb)*80(dollars/lb)=960dollars
Since we are looking at cost, the unit is dollars as expected
@vapid steppe Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vapid steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont get how to do this inductive proof
were you able to do the base case
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Yes sorry
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, can anyone please give me a hint why this proof is wrong? Personally, I think m/pn is just a specific case and therefore not representative for other cases.
@simple gull Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So far I've just tested basic points like -3, -1, -2, 0, 1, 2. I know that 0, 1 and 2 are all =. However when I tried [-1, 1] it said I was wrong. Don't understand why and how to fix it
well the interval you just wrote includes
-1, 0, 1
which you've just stated are values where |x| = x^2
yeah
but negative and positive numbers wouldn't work because of the exponent
it would be helpful to graph these two functions
no
no
can you indicate the locations where the red graph of |x|
is above the blue graph of x^2
x>-1 and x<1?
not quite, you forgot about exclusion of zero there
(-1,0)U(0,1)
yes
Closed by @brazen osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where is x^4 in the denominator for your planned decomposition coming from?
and also the degree of 4x^4 is still higher than that of x^2 - 4
so you should continue with your long division
i was adding the x^4 and getting the lcd for the equation i had but i now see what your talking about
so i keep going until theyre arent equal ?
So like this ?
.close
Closed by @simple zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the formula has (1/2)at iirc
so you should have -4.9m/s^2
wait a second that's wrong I think xD
displacement is given by Vot+1/2(a*t^2)
you divide by two after you square
@thorny moon
note that it says 30degrees from the vertical
oh from the vertical lol
they can't use this formula because they don't have delta x right
that's what is being asked
max height is when derivative is 0
and then use the formula you posted?
they all are deriving the general displacement equation
the only problem they made is velocity reference
@thorny moon Has your question been resolved?
whaatt the heeel is vot
this
what are those equations?
post them
you are working with acceleration the equation i posted is something you should be familiar with
all equation you posted are deriving 1 equation
they are put in a way to help you find what you need faster
last column explains that
yes
"variables not in equation"
you can use equation 2
literally means this variable is missing so probably you are looking for it
i mean we basically have vi
this is the reference
thats what i used but i got the wrong answerrr
idk what being launched from the vertical is
đđ
you did used the wrong value for v
you got the wrong answer because you calculated with wrong Vi
no
30 degrees from vertical
the angle is from the vertical not the horizontal for some reason
meaning you aim up and tilt either right or left with 30degrees
whats the difference
that's the meaning of referece from vertical
so use cos(30)
this
what if i said from the horizontal
just referencing to trick students
than you either aim right or left doesnt matter
and from there you tilt 30 degrees up
cause down is the ground
you can think of it as 60 degrees from the horizontal if you want
so basically it doesnt matter if u launch from vertical or horizontal it would give u the same?
OH
acc?
thats legal?
oh it worked
people learning physics only to pass
đđ
ofc it did
yessir
U NEVER MENTIONED IT WAS THE OPPOSITE đđ
:{
mauskateer op
what mmamađđ
;-; lance noticed the vertical thing
acceleration is in vertical plain yes
i assumed it was horizontal when i read question xD
yes that means people never deccelerate in X plain
that's something to keep in mind when you get into X,Y physics
when problem asks to find displacement vertically and horizontally
wait
basically the equations you have only work when there is acceleration
whatever ask again when you get to them
but start learning physics with more practicality it will get much easier
IF HORIZONTAL PLAIN IS THE OPPOSITE THEN I GOT THIS QUESTION WRONG TOO
wellđđ
but one of the equations doesnt have acceleration
it does, you are just solving for it
what i mean no acceleration i mean that a = 0
i did this
i think im confused on what launching vertically means
cuz what the hell
dina do you VC?
im so laggy but i can try
go in the call
@thorny moon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this?
I started with doing nPr(26,6)*nPr(6,2) but apparantly thats wrong
@celest stump Has your question been resolved?
but then why multiply by 8!
im tryna figure that out
wait if igured it out
it doesnt matter what order you picked out the red/black cards
but it does matter what order they are on your hand
i think thats why
maybe
tbh i just learned the intro to combinations tdy ask someone else
đ
@celest stump Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @celest stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am confused about this, because I do not know where to go from aftter finding the second derivative of e^5x(25x^2+20x+2)
what do you check for concave up?
open intervals
I mean what's the condition for f' and f'', do you know them?
no, i am confused about it
did you do something where you try to find points where f'(x)=0?
no this is for f''(x) > 0 and< 0
yes that's what I'm asking for, what did you try?
e^5x(25x^2+20x+2) > 0 and e^5x(25x^2+20x+2) < 0
im confused on how to find that tho
im stuck there
you got f'' but you still need to find values for which it's positive and negative
i dont understand
first you have to do this
check the procedure if you have a solved example
ok let me see if i can find any
okay thank you
How to find intervals of a function that are concave up and concave down by taking the second derivative, finding the inflection points, and testing the regions
found this video
you can ping me in case of doubt
yes
i am im doubt still
once i set it equal to 0
what do i do
to factor out the possible critical points?
for concavity
hi





