#help-0

1 messages · Page 174 of 1

whole shell
#

you have the values at say f(5) = 6, and f(6) = 7, so you use interpolation to guess what f(5.5) would be

#

but if it was continous

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

whole shell
#

you would already have the information for f(5.5)

#

there would be no jumps

#

you would know what f(5.000000000000000000000000000000000000005) would be

#

now that you know discrete vs continous

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

whole shell
#

the integration symbol is used like the summation symbol

craggy nebula
#

I don't see why continuous data doesn't use linear interpolation though.

whole shell
#

you would have no reason to use interpolation

#

you only use interpolation to interpolate because you dont have the information

craggy nebula
whole shell
#

no, i probably shouldnt have used f(x) twice

#

but i meant, if f(x) was continous, you would have no reason to use any sort of interpolation

#

since you would always have the information for any number to use in its domain

craggy nebula
#

So which data type do integrals use?

whole shell
#

continous

craggy nebula
#

Both?

#

Oh ok.

whole shell
#

summation

#

sigma

#

.

craggy nebula
#

How is it used in a context though?

whole shell
#

uses discrete

craggy nebula
whole shell
#

the integral is the continuos version

#

of the summation symbol

#

integration litearlly just adds up a bunch of very small stuff, to find the overall thing

#

the very small stuff are infintessimally small

craggy nebula
#

You must use a variable like n with integrals, right?

whole shell
#

yh, integration is usually in the form of $\int f(x)dx$

ocean sealBOT
#

doctor99268

whole shell
#

in this context

#

you would imagine

#

a rectangle,

#

where the base

#

is dx

#

as in very small

#

but the height is the value of f(x)

#

at the location the rectangle is in

#

@craggy nebula

#

like this

craggy nebula
#

Yeah. Thanks.

whole shell
#

then

#

for some reigion

craggy nebula
#

I don't see dx here though.

whole shell
#

we are getting there

#

if we pick some reigion, say between x = a and x = b

#

we can add up all those very smol rectangles

#

and those would add up to the area under the graph

craggy nebula
#

Mustn't we use the symbol?

whole shell
#

i dont partically like using set symbols

craggy nebula
whole shell
#

imagine, that rectangle

#

was located at x = 3

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

whole shell
#

and then we have another rectangle right next to it, at x = 3.000000000000000000000000000000000....000000000001

#

and so on

craggy nebula
#

Yeah, infinitesimals?

#

Isn't this infinitesimal calculus?

whole shell
#

pretty sure calculus is always infitessimal to begin with

craggy nebula
#

How can we determine the value of f(x)?

whole shell
#

we already know it

#

its like a given thing

#

if f(x) was x^2

#

now, if youre gonna wonder why, the process of integration itself

#

is the reverse of differentiation

#

that is something that confused me when i first learned about it

craggy nebula
#

So derivatives are the opposite?

whole shell
#

yh

#

integration is otherwise known as

#

the anti derivative

quasi vector
craggy nebula
whole shell
#

infact, what integration actually does itself

#

is said

#

in its name

#

integrating

#

as in bringing things together

#

adding up small things to become one thing itself

#

those smol rectangles, coming together to combine to be the area under the graph

craggy nebula
#

Why is the slope so oddly formed, and what determines its curves?

lament forge
#

that's just what f is in this case

whole shell
#

thats not the oddest slope, plus i think thats just a random graph theyve drawn

#

@craggy nebula imagine, you were given the derivative of a function

#

so dy/dx

#

you were given the gradient at every single point

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

whole shell
#

since the gradient is rise over run, if you times the gradient by run, you get the rise right?

#

in this case, our run is just an infitessimally smol change in x, called dx

#

so the rise would be $f'(x)dx$

ocean sealBOT
#

doctor99268

craggy nebula
#

What is d?

whole shell
#

dx means very smol change in x

#

like how $\Delta x$ would mean a sizable change in x

ocean sealBOT
#

doctor99268

whole shell
#

if we add up all the continous f'(x)dx for a certain reigion of a to b

#

so like, if you were walking down the street at t = 0 to t = 1 seconds, and i added up all the teeny bits of distance you have moved from then on

#

the total distance that i added up, would just be the distance you managed to walk from 0 to 1 seconds right? @craggy nebula

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

whole shell
#

in this case

#

if we add up

#

all the smol f'(x)dx

#

which we know that f'(x)dx is the very smol change in height, at each x location

#

the total number we get, would just be the difference between height (which is f(x)) at the start (so f(a))

#

and the height at the end which is f(b)

#

$\int_{a}^{b} f'(x)dx = f(b) - f(a)$

ocean sealBOT
#

doctor99268

whole shell
#

to go from f(x) to f'(x) you differentiate

#

so to go from f'(x) to f(x) which we have defined to be integration

#

the process would be the opposite

craggy nebula
#

f(x) and f'(x) are different? 😳

#

Is f'(x) the opposite?

whole shell
#

f'(x) is the derivative

#

of f(x)

#

so the gradient

#

youre thinking of

#

$f^{-1}(x)$

ocean sealBOT
#

doctor99268

whole shell
#

that is the opposite of f(X0

craggy nebula
#

All right.

whole shell
#

@craggy nebula another thing about integration is that

#

its not only used for finding the area under the graph

#

or finding the total height change if we are given the derivative

#

if you have something youre interested in finding out that is from a continous function, you can make it infitessimally small, and then sum it up.

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

#

This is very confusing to me though, sorry, I seem to be missing the basics and I am taking a large step if you know what I mean.

#

I don't really know how derivatives work. 😅

whole shell
#

if it makes you feel better

#

derivatives are eaasier to understand

#

than integration

craggy nebula
#

Isn't it the opposite though?

whole shell
#

yh, but the concept of derivatives is pretty easy

craggy nebula
#

I haven't even learned about limits yet. flonshed

whole shell
#

derivatives are easier to do aswell

#

there are some things that you flat out cannot integrate, but all things can be differentiated

#

the video that was linked earlier, from 3blue1brown

#

is a great one

craggy nebula
#

Yeah.

whole shell
#

he has pretty good visuals and everything

#

my only issue was that he never showed me as to why the process of integrating is the opposite of differentiating

#

i had to figure it out myself

#

but he does clearly show what integration actually is

craggy nebula
#

Thanks a lot for your time and explanation.

#

I'll have a look.

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @craggy nebula

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jaunty sedge
#

hi can someone help me get the answer to this? watching a yt video and i'm getting a different answer to his

vale wigeon
jaunty sedge
#

my thought process was that since it was sold for 5% less in 2019, i add 5% then take away 20% to get the original price of the house

whole shell
#

no

jaunty sedge
#

but that method did not align with what he was saying

whole shell
#

as it shouldnt

jaunty sedge
#

thought you were about to explain why

whole shell
#

well its best if i explain how to do it, then youll see

jaunty sedge
#

yes please do

whole shell
#

lets say the house alice bought

#

had a price of X

#

if she were to sell it for a 20% gain

#

then in 2014 the price of the house would be (1 + 0.2)X

#

you agree?

jaunty sedge
#

yes

whole shell
#

now lets call that price Y

#

so Y = (1 + 0.2)X

#

if the house was sold at a 5% loss

#

then the price of the house would be (1 - 0.05)Y right?

jaunty sedge
#

not sure

whole shell
#

we are following the same logic

jaunty sedge
#

oh yes

#

i get it

whole shell
#

now that we know what the final price of the house is

#

we can find Y

#

since (1 - 0.05)Y = 182400

jaunty sedge
#

we do the opposite?

whole shell
#

yh

#

so what is Y

jaunty sedge
#

191520?

#

?

#

is that wrong

#

i'm adding 5%

whole shell
#

no

#

what you do is

#

as in, yes thats wrong

#

because

#

youre not supposed to do 182400 * 1.05

#

but rather

#

182400 / 0.95

#

you dont reverse 5% reduction with 5% gain

jaunty sedge
#

i see

whole shell
#

because

#

thats just not how it works

#

for example

#

if you had 10 things

#

and you reduced it by 50%

#

so now you have 5 things

jaunty sedge
#

so to reversing reduction, i don't use a multiplier

whole shell
#

to go from 5 things to 10 things, you need a 100% gain

jaunty sedge
#

ohh i see

#

yes continue also thanks for the help

whole shell
#

you dont really need to think about it that hard

#

we just established that

#

0.95 * Y = 182400

#

then Y = 182400 / 0.95

#

so what is Y

jaunty sedge
#

160000

#

?

#

192000/1.2?

whole shell
jaunty sedge
#

x

whole shell
#

yh

#

that is what you would do

jaunty sedge
#

the original amount

whole shell
#

y = 192000

#

1.2X = Y

#

1.2X = 192000

jaunty sedge
#

i understand

whole shell
#

X = 192000/1.2

jaunty sedge
#

thanks!

#

have a nice day sir

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jaunty sedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tired drum
lone heartBOT
tired drum
#

I found the equation of the tangent

#

And found the equation for the area of between the functions

#

But h is not 1/tan(h)

lone heartBOT
#

@tired drum Has your question been resolved?

tired drum
#

<@&286206848099549185>

gray isle
#

!show

lone heartBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

alpine sable
#

okay uh

#

show your work

tired drum
#

Is there anything wrong in my working

#

<@&286206848099549185>

gray isle
#

you're missing 1/2 in the area of a triangle
where are you getting the numerical values for the max

#

since the area under the cos curve is constant you don't really have to worry about that
after getting the expression for area,
differentiate that wrt h
to determine when local extrema occur

gray isle
#

where are you getting the numerical values for the max
i don't see any attempt anywhere to determine when the min area occurs

tired drum
#

I found the expression for area by finding the area of the triangle

#

And minusing the area under the curve

#

I found the upper and lower bounds by finding the x and y intercepts of the tangent

#

You can see, where I let x=o and y=o that was me finding the values for max

#

But like there’s no point in finding those bounds

#

Because im finding the area between the two functions by finding the area of 2 seperate shapes

gray isle
#

why are you typing the letter o for 0...

#

anyway where you let x=0, y=0

#

that doesn't find the max

tired drum
gray isle
#

that determines the x and y intercepts of the tangent

tired drum
gray isle
#

you're the one using max

tired drum
#

Wdym by max?

gray isle
#

when i say it doesn't find the max, i mean it doesn't find anything close to what max could mean

#

whatever you meant when you said that

#

You can see, where I let x=o and y=o that was me finding the values for max

tired drum
#

Oh

#

So what do I do

#

If that doesnt find the max

gray isle
#

anyway where you let x=0, y=0
that determines the x and y intercepts of the tangent
which leads you to an expression for the area of triangle in terms of h

tired drum
#

Ye

gray isle
#

since the area under the cos curve is constant you don't really have to worry about that
(when finding the max area)
so the main focus would be to minimise the area of that triangle in with the restriction that it is in Q1

#

after getting the expression for area (in terms of h),
differentiate that wrt h
to determine when local extrema occur

tired drum
#

Oh

#

So i need to minimise the area of the triangle

#

And not the expression for the entire area

gray isle
#

you only need to the specified condition of the location where it occurs

tired drum
#

Mhm

#

Then what do I do?

gray isle
#

after getting the expression for area (in terms of h),
differentiate that wrt h
to determine when local extrema occur

#

don't make me copy paste again

#

And not the expression for the entire area
you could incorporate the area under the cos curve but its pointless as that area is constant and has no impact on optimisation

tired drum
#

Ok

tired drum
gray isle
#

consider the condition that the triangle is in quadrant 1,

#

and you'll get what's being asked

#

to make your work less clunky and save ink you could do stuff like
let s= sin(h)
let c = cos(h)

tired drum
#

Ok thx

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tired drum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

nimble fern
#

hello there!

#

! status

lone heartBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
nimble fern
#

have you learnt how to find volumes?

#

i see

#

so, you can try using the method that you've learnt to start with (c)

#

i see

#

I'll check

#

oh, you didn't change the subject correctly

#

y=x²/2+1
2(y-1)=x²

#

otherwise it's good

#

you're welcome!

alpine sable
#

Hey

#

i need help with this function question

#

after you find the gradient of BC

#

and convert it to find the gradient of L

nimble fern
lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

!help

lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

sorry Ryoka

#

my question is incomplete tho

#

that looks right

#

mark scheme here

#

but i dont undersatnd

#

waht did u do after u found gradient

#

yes

#

yes

#

yes

#

to get M of L

#

yes

#

then what

#

yes

#

yes

#

bbut why do u put it into like that

#

y not put points A into Y = mx + c form

#

like what did u input the point a into0

#

ohh u did use y= mx+c

#

wha did the markscheme use tho

#

y-20=3(x+2)

#

where did that come from

#

yh me too

#

akrgiht fine thank u very much

#

u appreciate it

#

thxxxxxxx

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @charred maple

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

hi

lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

How do u do part b ii.

#

I figured out the first two parts

ocean sealBOT
woeful pulsar
#

the regression line passes through (mean child age, mean adult age)

alpine sable
#

So to get mean child age I add 2+6+7+10+18/5 right

#

But what about mean adult age

#

Note that this is a non calculator exam

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

graceful quail
#

When I'm using calculator in degree mode I'm still not able to get this answer

graceful quail
#

Is the book wrong with this

#

I can calculate A and B with law of cosines but when it comes to C

#

It becomes a problem

last ether
#

c = 7.2

#

It gives you

hard inlet
#

^

last ether
#

What c is

graceful quail
#

I know the formula

#

When I key it in

#

I'm getting different answers

gray isle
#

can you show what you're entering

graceful quail
#

Oh I see it now

#

I had the same numbers just different sign

#

So is it only law of cosines that we are able to take inverse negative of

#

Or is it possible with law of sines too

gray isle
#

you can take the inverse sin of negative values,
it just won't ever pop up when applying the sine law

graceful quail
#

Oh

#

So only with law of cosines

lone heartBOT
#

@graceful quail Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe sail
#

can someone determine the validity of this statement?

∀n ∈ N. (n ≥ 6 → ∃x ∈ N. ∃y ∈ N. 3x + 4y = n)

safe sail
#

<@&286206848099549185>

timber needle
#

yea you can do it by induction

#

start by saying it's true for n=6

safe sail
#

should i then look for x and y that will make 3x+4y=n true for n=6?

timber needle
#

yea start by doing that

#

have ytou ever done induction?

safe sail
#

not really

timber needle
#

you basically show that a statement si true for your first rank

#

then you show that for any k (you suppose that it's true) above or equal to that first rank

#

k+1 is true aswell

#

thus the property is hereditary

#

and since it's true for the first rank it's true for all of them

#

so when n=6 you can find x and y that will give you 3x+4y=6

#

with x= 2 and y = 0

safe sail
#

yeah i tried that a while ago. the problem is that x and y must be natural numbers, so y=0 is nope...

timber needle
#

0 is a natural number

#

it's N here not N*

#

so you can take 0

safe sail
#

oh, okay i was thinking about like the counting numbers 1,2,3

#

okayyy, i think i get it now

#

thank you so much

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @safe sail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

last ether
#

I got another notation issue 💀

If I have a condition where z > -3 then something happens, and z is an element of [-2, 0], whose elements are all greater than -3, do I say:

z ∈ [-2, 0] > -3

last ether
#

Something about that seems janky

rose sigil
#

no i wouldn’t write that loll

last ether
#

How would I write it

#

Just say that the elements of [-2,0] are all greater rhan -3?

rose sigil
#

z \in [-2,0] so z > -3?

#

idk depends what you’re trying to say

heady pollen
#

$[-2,0]\ni z > -3$

ocean sealBOT
#

~Martin

heady pollen
#

🙂

last ether
#

That looks cursed

heady pollen
#

it is haha

mortal trellis
#

$[-2, 0] \subseteq {z: z>-3}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Denascite

last ether
#

I have to use subset?

mortal trellis
#

$z\in [-2, 0] \implies z>-3$

ocean sealBOT
#

Denascite

mortal trellis
#

give proper context about what you actually want to say

last ether
#

Well basically I have a 3D vector field whose divergence is 12 + 4z. And then I have a sphere whose radius is 1 and the center is (0,0,-1)

#

And so z is an element of [-2, 0]

#

And I have to explain why I predict the net flux of the field across the sphere is going to be from inside to outside

#

My teacher wants me to explain fully so

#

I'm trying to explain as much as I can 💀

#

Because his definition of "fully" is vague

rose sigil
#

just add one or two english phrases like so, since, we have, if then, implies, etc to “z \in [-2,0]” and “z > -3” that make it sound good

last ether
#

Alright then

#

Hopefully that's enough

#

Imma keep this open in case something real stupid happens

rose sigil
#

maybe you can even add

#

z >= -2 > -3

last ether
#

Although maybe I could word it out

#

z in [-2,0] whose elements are all less than -3

#

It just sounds nasty

rose sigil
#

i feel like i’ve told you before you shouldn’t be afraid to write words

echo socket
#

"If it's greater than -2, then it's greater than -3"?

last ether
#

I also wanna practice my understanding of symbols since things like this pop up

mortal trellis
#

as z is in [-2, 0], it is greater than -3 and therefore ...

last ether
#

Yeah that's what I did

#

I resorted to words when referencing sinks and sources in the field

mortal trellis
#

unbelievable, using words in math. imagine that

echo socket
#

Using only words or only symbols for a proof is hard

last ether
#

No I used both

rose sigil
#

not using a lot of words for a proof is hard

last ether
#

But then sentences :///

rose sigil
#

yes, writing sentences is part of math

echo socket
#

Just noticed this is help-0

#

The legendary help channel

last ether
#

Yeah I snagged it for funnies

#

Anyways ty

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @last ether

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

last ether
#

I hate writing sentences

rose sigil
#

too bad

last ether
#

I almost microwaved a fork 💀

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vivid quiver
#

.reopen

ember sigil
#

How do you call this rule? Or how do you do to get this ?

heady pollen
#

$(33)^{3/2}=(33)^{1+1/2}=(33)^1+(33)^{1/2}=33\cdot\sqrt{33}$

ocean sealBOT
#

~Martin

heady pollen
#

i would call it power properties maybe

ember sigil
#

Oh wow, thank you, that's better to understand

ember sigil
#

It shows this answer

#

We used lcf, but why 33 sqrt/ 33 didn't change?

#

Like just the other 1/9 changed to 1 because of the factorization

heady pollen
#

lcf?

#

also, are you sure the answer is true?
it looks like they messed up a minus

#

we can use the distributive rule here
if that looks weird, we can also write a+ab as a⋅1+a⋅b=a(1+b)

heady pollen
#

nice integral btw, classic case for substitution

ember sigil
#

it's a fun one, I just always have trouble at the end

#

Thanks bro

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ember sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

alpine sable
#

What is l'Hopital's rule for limits?

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ember sigil
ember sigil
ember sigil
#

Check this, this page is really helpful

prisma elbow
#

there are most than just 0/0 or inf/inf

ember sigil
prisma elbow
#

there's like 7 in total

ember sigil
#

Like how, I've just learned this lol

prisma elbow
#

if i remember correctly

#

0/0 and inf/inf are just most common

ember sigil
#

Now I'm curious, I'll search

alpine sable
#

Sorry to bother but are 0/inf and inf/0 determinate?

alpine sable
ember sigil
#

0/inf should be 0? Not 100% sure

ember sigil
alpine sable
#

And if it oscillates around 0, then it would be indeterminate

#

So, all of this put together, inf/0 is indeterminate but gives you more information than 0/0 or inf/inf

ember sigil
#

Hmm, I understand, I should check all the indefinite forms, sounds interesting :)

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ember sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

river canopy
lone heartBOT
hard inlet
#

!status

lone heartBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
whole shell
#

@river canopy

#

find the angles in the order

#

that i listed

#

acc

hard inlet
#

1->2->3->x

whole shell
#

the order doesnt even matter

#

you can go 1 3 2 x

#

or 1 2 3 x

#

2 and 3 are independant of each other

#

but 3 needs 1

lone heartBOT
#

@river canopy Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

primal galleon
#

,, \begin{gathered}\int^{}{} \left( 2x+3\right)^{2} \ln \left( 2x+3\right) dx\\ \int^{}{} udv=uv-\int^{}{} vdu\ \left( 2x+3\right)^{2} \ln \left( 2x+3\right) -\int^{}{} \ln \left( 2x+3\right) \frac{\left( 2x+3\right)^{3} }{3} dx\ \end{gathered}

ocean sealBOT
primal galleon
#

Can someone tell me if this is the correct?

quasi vector
#

well it is

#

but

#

you're just making things more complicated for yourself

#

you can just use substitution

#

infact

primal galleon
#

@quasi vector Initially I started with substituting 2x+3 with u

quasi vector
#

what you wrote is also wrong

#

I just noticed

quasi vector
#

what did that get you

primal galleon
#

So I kinda tried the DI method that you told me yesterday

#

and LIATE

#

I took the integral of (2x+3)^2 <=> u^2 = u^3/3

#

and then the derivative of ln(u)

#

I stopped at the first row

#

And got what you see on latex

quasi vector
#

that's correct

quasi vector
primal galleon
#

You mean I should've gone for more rows?

quasi vector
#

no

#

you stop at one row

#

but your multiplication is wrong somewhere

#

can you show me how you did it?

#

on your paper or whatever

primal galleon
#

Ok one moment

#

We start by making the substitution $u = 2x+3$. This means that $du/dx = 2$ and $dx = du/2$, so we can rewrite the integral as:

$$\int (2x+3)^2 \ln(2x+3) dx = \int u^2 \ln(u) \frac{du}{2}$$

ocean sealBOT
quasi vector
#

that's correct

primal galleon
#

Now, we focus on solving the simpler integral. We'll use integration by parts, with $u = \ln(u)$ and $dv = u^2/2 \cdot du$:

$$\int u^2 \ln(u) \frac{du}{2} = \frac{u^2 \ln(u)}{2} - \int \frac{u^2}{2} \frac{1}{u} du$$

From the formula $$\int^{}{} udv=uv-\int^{}{} vdu$$

quasi vector
#

well

ocean sealBOT
quasi vector
#

since you're already using u, using u for the IBP is kinda wrong

#

but glossing over that, your first term is wrong

#

$$\int^{}{} udv=uv-\int^{}{} vdu$$
Here, $$dv = u^2/2 \cdot du$$ as you said
so $$v = \int \frac{u^2}{2} \cdot du = \frac{u^3}{6}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

kheerii

quasi vector
#

so your first term has to be u^3ln(x)/6

#

and similarly for the second term

#

$dv \ne v$

ocean sealBOT
#

kheerii

quasi vector
#

to get v, you have to integrate dv

#

also, you're already using u for your substitution, so u = ln(u) doesn't make sense

#

either use a different variable for your IBP or for your substitution

primal galleon
#

Okay I will need some time to process this, I will open another ticket if I'm still stuck.

lone heartBOT
#

@primal galleon Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vague coral
#

you can take a counterexample i guess

echo socket
#

Pick a_k = (-1)^(k + 1)/k

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tiny mango

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rotund shoal
#

How many unqiue number plates can there be in the form XXYYYY wher X represents a number from 0 to 9 and y represents a letter from the alphabet?

rotund shoal
#

Would the answer be 10 x 10 + 26 x 26 x 26 x 26

#

Is there meant to be a + separating the digits and the letters since they don't overlap

#

as in, the digits are set to be on the left side of the numnber plate only?

#

I cannot decide if there should be a plus or multiplication separating the 10 and 26

quasi vector
#

since the two probabilities are different, it would be a x sign

#

it's the same as why you have done 26x26x26x26

#

since they are all independent events

rotund shoal
#

I see. In what case would it be a plus?

#

Could you give an example?

quasi vector
carmine reef
#

If you could choose either a 2-digit license plate OR a 4-letter one

#

then it would be +

rotund shoal
#

Ohh right okok

#

since they are separate?

carmine reef
#

since it's or

#

or means +

rotund shoal
#

ohh right or/and

carmine reef
#

and means *

rotund shoal
#

gotcha

#

thank you

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rotund shoal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

carmine reef
#

no problem

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vagrant lantern
#

what single equation could i use to calculate a value between 0 and 10(y) to smoothly convert to a value 0.3333 to 1.5(x)?

vagrant lantern
#

im programming in python and normally id just solve this with several expressions but i need to optimize as much as possible and express it as one value. the expression im modifying is dynamic_weight = 0.5 * ((running_avg / weight) - 1)

#

or
0.5 * ((A/B) - 1) = Y if that makes it any easier to read

#

and if one of you hugebrains happens to be experienced with ai stuff, google is not great when it comes to notation regarding the effects of modifying the l1 regularizer value after its been put through the lambda function on over/underfitting

marsh rapids
alpine sable
marsh rapids
#

you call it whatever you want

alpine sable
#

idk if thsts related to the question being asked

lone heartBOT
#

@vagrant lantern Has your question been resolved?

vagrant lantern
#

sorry

#

got sidetracked there

#

@marsh rapids maybe? dunno, i dont have big mathbrains at all. im kinda dumb tbqh im just looking for a single equation that i can convert into a python expression to translate y into x

marsh rapids
vagrant lantern
#

if what i described is that then yes

marsh rapids
#

passing through (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is the line y(x) = y1 + (x-x1)(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

vagrant lantern
#

not ignoring just trying to sort and test

#

x and y in that example = x and y in mine?

marsh rapids
#

you might want to review basic algebra and more btw

vagrant lantern
#

thanks for the advice

#

so i end with
x = 1/3 + (7/120) * (A/B - 1)?
i feel like ive screwed it here

marsh rapids
#

I guess

vagrant lantern
#

you know, rather than being condescending id rather you just let someone else try to help

#

would have saved the both of us some time and effort

marsh rapids
#

not as in "you messed up"

vagrant lantern
#

sorry, im fried out right now i misread the tone there

#

my bad, ive been wrestling with overly complicated programming stuff all day every day for like four days and im getting frustrated with myself because im getting worse at simple stuff the longer i keep going for

#

but the worse i get at it the longer its taking

marsh rapids
#

take some rest

vagrant lantern
#

yeah, i know but im so enamored with the project im just obsessing over it when im not working on it

lone heartBOT
#

@vagrant lantern Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @vagrant lantern

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

vagrant lantern
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

vagrant lantern
#

i thought i had it down but testing is showing that im not getting expected values

#

dynamic_weight = 0.5 * ((running_avg / weight) - 1) is the expression i started with

#

or y=0.5*((A/b)-1)

#

combined with this to find a line for variable y
x = 1/3 + 7/6 * y / 10

#

using this formula y(x) = y1 + (x-x1)(y2-y1)/(x2-x1

#

to convert y into a spread of numbers ranging from 0.3333-1.5

#

with a tolerance for y to be between 0-10

#

i simplified it into this string

#

dynamic_weight = 1/3 + 7/60 * (0.5 * ((10 / 5) - 1)

#

or

#

x = 1/3 + (7/120) * (A/B - 1)

#

with x being the new variable created from calculating the previous dynamic_weight(y) variable

#

the issue im having is my own fault because i asked for the wrong expression
im trying to figure out how to phrase the expression i need

#

assuming y calculates at most to 7 and at minimum to 0.1428 how can i apply this so that the resulting number lands between 1 and 0.3333 for values under or = 3.157 and between 1.0001 up to 1.5 for values over 3.157?

#

the formula for y being y=0.5*((A/b)-1)

#

the key here is that im trying to express the entire calculation, including the one for y in a single expression

lone heartBOT
#

@vagrant lantern Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@vagrant lantern Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@vagrant lantern Has your question been resolved?

violet flare
#

I'm having a bit of a stroke and if someone could help me with this quesiton would be much appreciated. f(x) = x if x εQ, and |x| otherwise

#

the range would be -infinity, infinity right?

#

.open

#

@lone heart

violet flare
#

ah, thank you

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

keen trellis
#

I need asap help for c), d), e)

lone heartBOT
surreal meadow
#

can you take a guess at the domain of f o g?

violet flare
#

lmao

surreal meadow
#

whats qld

violet flare
#

misspelt

surreal meadow
#

!nosols

lone heartBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

violet flare
#

ah whoops

surreal meadow
#

that’s not quite it btw

violet flare
#

ok how would you solve it then?

surreal meadow
#

i’ll walk the asker through it if they come back

violet flare
#

now im curious

surreal meadow
#

can you del this

#

ty

violet flare
#

yes

#

why did you want me to delete it

surreal meadow
#

because it has a good amount of the answer in there

violet flare
#

ha

#

*ah

#

can you walk me through it

#

im curious now

surreal meadow
#

i’ll just dm you

violet flare
#

ok

lone heartBOT
#

@keen trellis Has your question been resolved?

keen trellis
#

@surreal meadow hi

#

How did you get fog as well?

surreal meadow
#

do you have any guesses as to what the domain would be

keen trellis
#

All real?

surreal meadow
#

yes

#

and how about the range

keen trellis
#

The same?

surreal meadow
#

not quite

#

can you think of any numbers that give you -1 as an output?

keen trellis
#

I’m having trouble understanding how you find fog cuz it’s a pie wise function

surreal meadow
#

think about what happens when you plug in a number in either of the pieces

#

i.e. a rational or an irrational

keen trellis
#

Well if it’s rational it be psoyive or negative

#

Can only be irrational positives

surreal meadow
#

well let’s take it step by step

#

f o g (x) = f(g(x))

keen trellis
#

Yeh

surreal meadow
#

let’s say we plug in a rational number

#

what is g(x) then?

keen trellis
surreal meadow
#

i assume you mean |x|

keen trellis
#

Yeh

surreal meadow
#

then yes

#

and is |x| rational or irrational (given that x is rational)

keen trellis
#

Rational

surreal meadow
#

yes

#

so we get f(|x|)

#

where |x| is rational

#

so what is f(|x|)

keen trellis
#

Uhhh g(x)?

surreal meadow
#

sort of

#

f(x) = x when x is rational

keen trellis
#

Yep

surreal meadow
#

so f(|x|) = |x|

#

when x is rational

#

so f o g(x) = |x|, when x is rational

keen trellis
#

Oh okay

#

So when it’s irrational it would be x?

surreal meadow
#

let’s do it step by step again

#

f(g(x))

#

when x is irrational, what is g(x)?

keen trellis
#

x

surreal meadow
#

so what is f(x)

keen trellis
#

x

surreal meadow
#

no

#

look at the definition of f(x) again

keen trellis
#

Oh so |x| again?

surreal meadow
#

yes

keen trellis
#

When irrational

surreal meadow
#

so f o g(x) is always = |x|

#

so what’s the range

keen trellis
#

[0,infinity)

surreal meadow
#

yes

keen trellis
#

That was a huge help

#

So then with fog it is multiplying by x?

#

For the next question?

surreal meadow
#

for d or e?

keen trellis
#

D?

#

D*

#

Wait no

surreal meadow
#

d is asking if it’s one-to-one

keen trellis
#

Yeah

#

And then e is multiplication

surreal meadow
#

e is multiplying the two functions yeah

keen trellis
#

So how would you multiple a piece wise

#

It’s the piece wise part that confuses me

surreal meadow
#

multiply it piecewise

keen trellis
#

When doing all this

surreal meadow
#

multiply the rational parts and the irrational parts

keen trellis
#

So x^2 and

#

No wait

#

Bruh I’m so dumb

surreal meadow
#

you’re not

#

what would the multiplication be?

keen trellis
#

x|x|?

surreal meadow
#

yes

keen trellis
#

For both

surreal meadow
#

and for the other piece?

#

yup

#

do you know how to show if they are one-to-one?

keen trellis
#

I think so

#

You sub in numbers right?

#

To prove that x1 and x2 have the same values

#

Or not

surreal meadow
#

that’s to show they are not one to one yeah

keen trellis
#

Yeh I’ll give them one to ones a shot on my own

#

Can I dm you if I get stuck?

surreal meadow
#

ask here

keen trellis
#

Alright

surreal meadow
#

i’ll help if i’m available

keen trellis
#

You’ve been an amazing help

#

Thank you

lone heartBOT
#

@keen trellis Has your question been resolved?

candid obsidian
#

Hello anyone can please solve this question?

keen trellis
#

@surreal meadow I’m having touble with the 1-1

surreal meadow
surreal meadow
keen trellis
#

The x|x|

#

And the |x|

#

@surreal meadow

surreal meadow
#

for the |x|, find 2 different values of x that give the same output

#

for |x|x, you’re not asked to prove it, so i’d graph it and check whether or not it is one to one

keen trellis
#

For |x| tho it’s 3 makes

#

How would we write it so it’s worth 3 marks

surreal meadow
#

if it’s one to one then f(x) = f(y) implies x = y

#

so find two different x and y such that f(x) = f(y) that’s all there is to it

keen trellis
#

So any negative and positive value have the same y values

candid obsidian
lone heartBOT
surreal meadow
#

specifically, x and -x have the same output

candid obsidian
surreal meadow
lone heartBOT
wraith bramble
surreal meadow
wraith bramble
#

If you want the specific solution, I will be writing it

keen trellis
#

@surreal meadow also (e) actually does say to prove it, I cut it off in the photo

#

I’m v confused how to do that

surreal meadow
#

suppose |x|x = |y|y. then (|x|x)/(|y|y) = 1

#

squaring you get (x^2 * x^2)/(y^2 * y^2) = 1
so x^4 / y^4 = (x/y)^4 = 1, so x/y = +-1

#

then either x = y or x = -y, consider what happens when x=-y with the original function. it’ll be an extraneous solution (unless x = 0), so the only actual general solution is x = y, but you need to show that

keen trellis
#

I’m very confused on this question

#

How do you work out x1, x2

#

@surreal meadow

surreal meadow
#

i’m confused what are x1 and x2

keen trellis
surreal meadow
#

your x1 and x2 are my x and y

keen trellis
#

Can you step me through how I’d do it

surreal meadow
keen trellis
#

Why Are we diving it to prove 1-1

surreal meadow
#

to show 1-1 you show f(x) = f(y) implies x = y

#

the steps we did let us arrive at the conclusion that x = y

keen trellis
#

Which prove it’s one-one

surreal meadow
#

yes

keen trellis
surreal meadow
#

if x = y we’re done, it’s 1-1

#

then we need to test the other case

#

so we assume x = -y

#

plug that back into |x|x = |y|y

keen trellis
#

-x = -y

#

X = Y

surreal meadow
#

|-y|*-y = |y| * y

#

so |y| * -y = |y| * y

#

suppose y is not 0 so we can divide by |y|

#

then -y = y

#

what is the only solution to this

keen trellis
#

So your saying x1 = -x2

surreal meadow
#

yes

keen trellis
#

Why is it |y| * y

surreal meadow
#

so

#

when we did the calculations

#

we arrived at 2 possibilities

#

either x = y

#

or x = -y

keen trellis
#

Yeh

surreal meadow
#

if x=y then it’s 1-1

#

so we consider the other case

#

x=-y

#

or x1=-x2

#

so we go back to the original assumption

#

|x|x = |y|y

#

and plug in x = -y

keen trellis
#

Yep

surreal meadow
keen trellis
#

Oh right

#

Okay

surreal meadow
#

read on from there

#

you get up to -y = y

#

what’s the only solution to that

keen trellis
#

Does that mean it’s not one to one

surreal meadow
keen trellis
#

0

surreal meadow
#

yes

#

so if y=0

#

then x = -0 = 0

#

so x = y

keen trellis
#

So one -one

surreal meadow
#

yes

keen trellis
#

Ahhh alright

#

Thank you

candid obsidian
keen trellis
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @keen trellis

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dry tartan
lone heartBOT
dry tartan
#

Someone help me with this question pls

lone heartBOT
#

@dry tartan Has your question been resolved?

dry tartan
#

<@&286206848099549185>

exotic belfry
#

!show

lone heartBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

dry tartan
#

completly stuck

#

why is A1 = 1.002

#

where did it come from

exotic belfry
#

first think of this: what is the amount at the end of the week, when starting with 100 and a weekly compounded interest from 10.4 percent?

lone heartBOT
#

@dry tartan Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@dry tartan Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@dry tartan Has your question been resolved?

exotic belfry
#

@dry tartan

lone heartBOT
#

@dry tartan Has your question been resolved?

mystic kestrel
#

help

slate monolith
lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

covert cobalt
#

claim

lone heartBOT
covert cobalt
#

i think in english name of cours is Straight in plan

#

but in french droite dans le plan

marsh rapids
#

or lines in 2D

covert cobalt
#

yes

#

i have course next week but idont know what i do here

marsh rapids
#

AM = M - A

covert cobalt
#

it is that u vector = M ?

marsh rapids
#

no ?

#

u is a fixed vector, M is a point. There's no way they can be equal
Also M isn't fixed so since u is, there's no way u = AM could always hold

covert cobalt
#

i think AM = xA i + yA j

marsh rapids
covert cobalt
#

aah yeah

#

AM =(xb - xa ; yb - ya)

#

AM = xi +yj

#

AM=(1 i + (-3) j )

marsh rapids
#

do you know how to find a vector from 2 points ?

covert cobalt
#

yes

marsh rapids
#

so why are you struggling

covert cobalt
#

doing the same projction

#

no just puting my ideas there 💀

#

like to try

#

im working just from pc no paper

marsh rapids
covert cobalt
#

fr im in another exercise

lone heartBOT
#

@covert cobalt Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @covert cobalt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

languid barn
lone heartBOT
languid barn
#

help

#

guys

plain flame
#

$a^x = e^{\ln (a) \cdot x}$

ocean sealBOT
languid barn
plain flame
#

excuse me

languid barn
#

not you brother

languid barn
plain flame
#

its how you initiate a math environment in LaTeX

#

which is documentation software

languid barn
#

oh

plain flame
#

which is useful for math notation

languid barn
#

ok

plain flame
#

hence this server has a LaTeX bot

languid barn
#

I need to solve this before I eat my lunch

plain flame
#

$e^{\ln (x)} = x$

ocean sealBOT
plain flame
#

and more generally

#

$e^{\ln (x) \cdot c} = (e^{\ln (x)}) ^c = x^c$

ocean sealBOT
plain flame
#

which you know how to intergrat

lone heartBOT
#

@languid barn Has your question been resolved?

harsh dome
tacit arch
lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tacit arch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

last ether
#

D is the entire circle?

#

Also shouldn't they be double integrals thinkies

vale cliff
#

im not completely sure

last ether
#

Hm well I'm assuming they're supposed to be double integrals because like

#

Yeah

vale cliff
#

why

last ether
#

Or are they path integrals?

#

It wouldn't make sense to single integrate a region and have dA

#

Typically dA is for double integrals

#

$$\iint_D\dd A$$

vale cliff
#

hmm

ocean sealBOT
#

Umbraleviathan

last ether
#

This just measures the area of D

#

$\int_D \dd A$ to me, makes no sense

ocean sealBOT
#

Umbraleviathan

tacit arch
last ether
#

Well @vale cliff I think you can answer the 1st question. The second one, I would sketch out the region it's being integrated over, and then sketch the integrand if need be

#

But notice how the region is R (which is all positive x values), so 5x within R must all be positive

vale cliff
#

hmm okay

#

ty

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vale cliff

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cursive cosmos
#

can i have help

lone heartBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
#

@cursive cosmos Has your question been resolved?

serene junco
#

@alpine sable Someone else opened this channel before you. You should ask your question in one of the channels in the available section (although I'm not really sure that's a math question but whatever)