#help-0
1 messages · Page 137 of 1
yes, so f(x)=x is a fixed point
Okay
Let p be the solutions to x = ax^2 + bx + c, which makes it the fixed points of Q(x)
okay, I am not sure how that will help.
That's what the question tells you to do
Then the question wants you to prove some cases for p
If you plug p into Q'(x) and it gave 1, then prove that it is not attracting when you use fixed-point iterative method.
to confirm, fixed-point iterative method would mean I would show |Q'(p)|>1
Hmm
In the question, it tells you to prove that when Q'(p) = -1, then it is attracting and for Q'(p) = 1, then it is not attracting.
Closed by @empty forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does something mean when it is "lying strictly between x and y"
$x\le \text{something} \le y$
oh thank you
no
tysm
also, it's possible that y < x
im trying to prove that for x, y in set Q there exists some number that is strictly between x and y (when x not equal to y
wdym by this?
Q = rationals?
"between x and y" doesn't necessarily mean x < y
oh sorry, more specificially its lying strictly between
what's the simplest rational you can think of that's guaranteed to be between x and y?
assuming x and y are themselves rational
x/y?
Not quite
oh wait thats a good strategy
can you think of a rational number between 1 and 2?
like 1.5
yeah perfect
well if x = 1 and y = 2, thats specifically x + y / y
yea in this particular case (x+y)/y works
what if y wasn't 2 though
3/2 is midway between 1 and 2
how would you find a number midway between x and y
for arbitrary numbers x and y
like x + y / 2
i need to use the definition of a rational number
which i know is two integers expressed as a / b where b not eq to 0
yea, can you explain why (x+y)/2 is rational if x and y are?
a rational number divided by any number is still a rational number
by any rational number
yes
so what reasoning can you use here
that explains why it lies strictly between x and y
because they are already rational numbers
defined
like id be like fix rational numbers x, y e Q right
because ive defined it
x+y
isnt that closed
is the sum of two rationals still rational?
i could be off base but i suspect that whoever is asking this will want you to prove this carefully
the answer is yes, but i dont know how to prove this
i appreciate suggestions (im new to this type of mth)
math
i would go back to the definition
if x is rational then i can write it as a/b where a,b are integers
if y is rational then i can write it as c/d where c,d are integers
now find x+y as a function of a,b,c,d
see if i can express it as a ratio of two integers
ahh the goal is to show that it over all ends up being sum thing / another thing right
i think it comes out to like (ad) + (cb) / 2 (bd)
yes!
and the numerator and denominator are integers
ad + bc = integer
2bd = integer
so when you divide them you get a rational number
.close
Closed by @sour swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the point P on the line y=5x that is closest to the point (52,0) . What is the least distance between P and (52,0)?
WHY IS THE WORK NEGATIVE
its asking for the closest point please help
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
i dont understand
Please use a new channel:
#help-13
Closed by @eternal kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it got drowned below the rubble
gotta refresh the feed
.close
Okay lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
−3x+5>x−19 is not (6, infinity) ?
Remember to flip the > sign if you divide by a negative number
@strong geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
p(p^2+3)=12+p^3
What are you asking?
I need to solve this question
my problem is i dont know how to factor p into the parenthesis
Distribute
yes
okay so then it turns into 3p=12
now divide
then divide by 3 on both sides and get p=4?
Yes
yeah
That's it
idk why math solvers are making it so complicated
it says the answer to the problem is 3p^3
my brain was exploding
ty !
Then you typed something wrong
.close
Closed by @sudden gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just to make sure - what's X tilde g here
I believe it is the permuted elements of X tilde
maybe the subscript has some special group theoretical meaning I'm not aware of?
I'm 99% sure it's fixed points
it seems weird they don't introduce it
I use different notation personally lol
oh well that would do it, wouldn't it
Okay wait yeah I get what this is saying lmao this has to be for some burnsides theorem thing later on
or wait maybe not idk
Are you comfortable with the proof of 14.21
why didnt they just call it stabG(x) lmao
NEIN

Okay wait let me try to write this out then
ye so a fixed point of g is a function where "applying g to the domain" doesn't change the outputs
hence f(2)=f(4)=f(5)
since if we apply g, f(2) becomes f(4)
This is such a bizarre formulation to introduce an entirely new group rather than just describing how the action of G on X extends to functions f:X -> Y
with the first equality holding specifically because f is a stabilizer

@ornate condor Has your question been resolved?
@ornate condor Has your question been resolved?
@ornate condor Has your question been resolved?
this is why any f must have the same value on each cycle
@ornate condor Has your question been resolved?
ok i shld look at it now
ok so um
the cycles have 4 unique values, each cycle has a unique value
and there are 3 options
but why 3^4
what does that represent
hm
is there a more
visual example
idk relate a square or triangle, with3 colors coloring mayb
prev eg they gave was a square w 2 colors, D4
is that related? na?
let A be a set of 3 colors
a way to color vertices of a square can be thought of as an ordered quadruple: (color 1, color 2, color 3, color 4)
then, valid colorings are elements of A x A x A x A, which has a cardinality of |A|*|A|*|A|*|A|, which is 3^4
wait
what happened to permutation groups and cycles
why did they take the order of um idk n how does it relate to ur eg
cuz for them they used some cycles thing right
Hey I was wondering if I could get help with some programming in python!
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
And please check out #old-network and computer science server
Thank you
@ornate condor Has your question been resolved?
ok nvm
i dont get a lot of things
this is another ill pass on
lol
thanks all
thanks
snow
moni
lyra
vulcan
activemental
i love you snow
.close
Closed by @ornate condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help please, this was a question in my recent mock exam and i got 3/5 marks for it
So first I believe you have to calculate the angle at DCB
yeah, i’ve calculated that to be 30
yes that's correct
i can send the working out i did on the test that got me 3 marks
go for it
but it’s messy
Is this GCSE?
yeah
alright sick I can help with this
you from the uk too?
oh damn
do you see what you did wrong with your working ?
i’m aiming for a 9 i got an 8 in my recent mocks
if you got an 8 just now you'll get 9 for sure
hopefully, i’ve been making a tonne of silly mistakes lately
alright so once you got your angle you're right in doing cosine rule
okay
the length opposite the angle we worked out?
yes the final side of the rightmost triangle
okay i got that correct too
and then you're gonna have to do cosine rule again to calculate the angle opposite the side we just worked out in the second triangle
and I think this is where you made your mistake
so you know when labelling angles the capital A is always opposite to the side a
you have three sides here so it's doable for sure
so we are going to work out the angle labelled DAB
yeah i labelled the triangle myself, i ignored the labels given in the question
yeah that's what you should do
okay so do you remember the equation for the angle from cosine rule or do you remember cosine rule and rearrange it yourself to get the angle
i rearrange it myself
Yeah I don't think that's correctr
yeah that’s exactly where i went wrong then
$(b^2+c^2-a^2)/(2bc) = cos(A)$
Karatesam100
Do you want me to go through the steps for that
yeah please
$a^2 = b^2 + c^2 -(2bc)(cos(a))$
Karatesam100
so that's where we start from right?
yup
obviously a meant to be A at the cos A bit
yeah
first I would move the b^2 and c^2 to the side with a^2
okay
$a^2-b^2-c^2 = -2bc cos(A)$
Karatesam100
yeah
at this point (this isn't necessary) I multiply by -1
this gives you
$b^2+c^2-a^2 = 2bccos(A)$
Karatesam100
agreed?
it makes it much easier to look at
and then you can do the rest
also what you did from this point was correct but it could be done more easily
you tried to find one angle and then did sine rule right?
yeah
so you can, instead of doing that, just set your angle A as the angle you're trying to find, and then name your side accordingly
just skips a step
oh
DW about it though, you're in year 11?
ohhh waitt
i think i done that way but i rearranged the formula wrong
and that’s why i got the maths error
so x = A in your formula ?
yeah
yeah
you'll 100% get the hang of it, you got like 95% of the way there before making a mistake
and you probs only did non-right angled trig only recently
yeah literally don't worry then you'll do fine lol
good that you asked for help though
yeah i’ve got 3 other questions lmao but i’ll use another channel
if you want you can ask here
thanks a ton for your help dude
I'm not busy
did you get anywhere with this or were you just stuck completely
i got two marks for this question but it was clueless me in the exam trying to get any marks i could
alright no worries
that was my working out
edexcel ?
yup
alright
I hate this question we don't do anything like this in A level
if you don’t know what to do it’s completely fine dw
it’s cool
if i get somewhere i'll dm you
yeah
these questions are hard man what's with edexcel
i could do this with A level maths
but I'm trying to do it a way that you'd do in gcse
they are rough
they’re horrible ibsr
how many marks is this one
what equations and stuff do you know for vectors from edexcel
i did aqa so im not sure what edexcel people are meant to know
no equations whatsoever
just that they have direction and stuff
you're not
oh damn
i tried doing differentiation to work out one of my ones i dropped a mark
got the q right though
??
oh
i mean i would rather know how to do something and get marks for potential workng out and an answer tbh
so i’ll probably start teaching myself vector methods
yeah that’s just stupid ibsr
i think the answer is 3/7
you’re probably right atp
I'll keep working on it let's close the channel i'll dm you if i get it with gcse
alright
that’s fine, thanks a tonne for your help
icl idk if random people can message me but you can try
see ya in a bit, maybe
if ur in the server
Closed by @cerulean goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
I need help, I have a reasoning problem
so i have to work with Q(X) = constant where Q is a polynom in Rm+1[X]
and Q(X) = a0 X1/1 + a1 X2/2 + ... + am Xm+1 / m+1
a0,a1... in Rm+1
in fact Q(X) = f(0) where f is a continuous function in [0,1]
the question is, determine the biggest m in N verifying this equality
and my brain tell me it's 0
(i'm fr so my mathematic english may be horrible)
so i don't know how to tackle with the pb
$Q(x) = a_0 \frac{x^1}{1} + a_1 \frac{x^2}{2} + \ldots + a_m \frac{x^{m+1}}{m+1}$ or what?
Denascite
yes it is
and this is supposed to be constant?
= f( x=0 ) where f is a continuous function on [0,1]
the right term is evaluated on x = 0, and the left one is for all x in [0,1]
do you not know yet that only polynomials of degree 0 are constant?
so the biggest m in N verifying this equality is 0 ?
but Q(x, m = 0) = a0 x1 / 1 which is not equal to a constant in [0,1]
that's my pb
well then no m satisfies this equality
not sure why you start with a_0 x^1 instead of a_0x^0
and what if all x = 1, like a0 / 1 + ... + am/m+1 = f(0), how can i determine m ?
it's from an integration
can you show the original problem statement
ok something something quadrature
yea
ok, so the point of quadrature is to approximate the integral int_0^1 f(x) dx by evaluating f(x) at certain points and then taking a linear combination of those, yes?
i guess, it's the first part of the pb
what exactly do you mean with pb
it's a 39-questions pb
is problem not accurate in english ?
exam
hw
i dunno lol
oh it's just short for problem? ok
e(f) define its associated error
and generally a measure of how good these formulas are is to check for how many polynomials they are accurate
good, so we want to know for which polynomials this particular formula is accurate
in other words, if $Q(x)$ is a polynomial, when is $Q(0) = \int_0^1 Q(x) dx$
Denascite
and the first question is to determine the biggest m in N where the quad formula is accurate so the biggest m in N where e(P) = 0 where P is in Rm[X]
hmm no, f(0) = int(0,1) Pdx
P in Rm[X]
but f is P
i didn't understood this way
oh
so f is polynomial..
so the biggest m where e(f=P) = 0****
here f(0) = a0 for sure
no. e is the error
the biggest m so that the integral is equal to f(0)
do you know that these quadrature formulas are linear
what do you mean by linear
if you want to approximate int f+g dx, you have I_n(f+g) = I_n(f) + I_n(g)
oh sure but are we using it for the first question?
so if you can approximate both f and g already, then you know that you can also approximate f+g
the point is that for polynomials this means we only need to approximate x^k
we don't have to worry about all polynomials, just about a basis
i do not understand your idea
like
to sum up
we have f(0) = a0 = int(0,1) f
if the formula is accurate
and where f = a0 X0 + a1 X1 + a2X2 + ... + am Xm
so we have a0 = a0 1^1 / 1 + ... + am 1^m+1 / m+1 isn't it ?
when you integrate between 0 and 1
the point I want to get to is that we don't have to worry about these big ass sums
they are annoying
if the quadrature formula is accurate for $1, x, x^2, \ldots, x^m$, then it is also accurate for any linear combination $a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+\ldots+a_mx^m$
Denascite
that means we only need to test for x^k
ok i understand that point
which is much easier
ok so we have to check if e(x^m) = 0
so we can find the biggest m verifying this equation
Denascite
yes bc Q(0) = 1
Q(x)=1 so yes Q(0)=1
ok good
so the formula is accurate for 1=x^0
next k=1
if $Q(x)=x$, is $\int_0^1 Q(x) dx = Q(0)$ ?
Denascite
no
so we get m=0
yes
ohh okkk
the formula is only accurate for constant polynomials. which is pretty shit but then again if you just take f(0) what really do you expect
so if i want to right it correctly
I_0 (f) = f(0) means int(0,1) {a0 + a1X + ... + amXm} = f(0) = a0
<=> f = a0 for all x
which is logical but i could not correctly establish my reasoning
well written like this it's not true
the integration formula will still be true for some polynomials of arbitrary degree
namely if the sum of the a_i just happens to be equal to a0
the point is that you want it to be true for arbitrary polynomials
yeah but int(0,1) {f} = int(0,1) {a0 + a1X + ... + amXm} = a0 + .... + am / m+1
and also equals to f(0) = a0
only if m=0
or if the a_i just so happen to satisfy this
a1=2, a2=-3
but how can i dodge this issue
give an explicit counterexample of a polynomial for which it doesn't work
which is what we did
it works for q(x)=1, but not for q(x)=x
yes
this example is imo a tiny bit too simple to completely see the picture. but you'll probably do other examples later
could you write properly your path of thought ?
like 1. understand the pb , 2. see that the formula is linear ... ?
well I mean mostly I remember it from doing it before
so not exactly sure what you want to hear?
the way you thought abt giving a counterexample
it's a brilliant idea i would never have had it
which counterexample?
but again, I know this stuff already
it's something I've done before
in this way
oh ok so i guess i will be better in maths w/ the experience
thank you for helping me
.close
Closed by @austere linden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got this wrong… not sure why
hi
Hello
ur so smart
no sarcasticly
idk how to do that
Neither do I lol
heavy
heavy
we all know what you mean even without the dx
but your teacher will deduct points for it
Oh you just started caring about the notation finally Heavy 😏 Good !
Yea bad habit
On the second line, shouldn't you square 10/4?
you applioed the right substitution
On the left
A* right substitution 🤓
By saying "the", you are assuming that only one substitution is working here
I don’t think so. That would make it 1000 and then I couldn’t pull it out of square root
x^2 is (10/4 sec(theta))^2
Also, you didn't compute the square correctly in the square root
Oh
Look out at how you applied the squares, and look at at the brackets in the square root
(so 3 mistakes actually 👀)
But I am sure you can correct them easily
I see it
Thank u
@jagged forge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @jagged forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the integral of $\frac{t-i}{t^2+1}$
dabble
i would like to simplify by t-i and integrate to get ln(t+i)
but i believe i do not have the right to do that since the logarithm of a complex number is not defined
So what do i do?????????????????????????????????????
what do i do then
i am trying to solve a differential equation and i need to integrate this somehow
Split your fraction and you should get inverse trig integrals if my intuition is correct
,w derivative atan(x)
idk what that means
lol i was going to do partial fractions
Split your t and i into separate fractions
yeah ig so
,w derivative ln(t^2+1)/2 - i*arctan(t)
,w integral of (t-i)/(t²+1)
okay ill see if it gives me a good answer
,w log(a+b*i)
mmm... okay ill try both
lol
Just do matrix odes
yeah i am doing that
Replace current nightmares for new ones
Solodes are interesting but oh so much work
I fucking hate them
it's a time black hole
You spend hours staring at equations you're sure you can solve them BUT there's always this tiny fucking detail you missed

@high ether Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @high ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it possible for me to manipulate $1 + (1 + \lfloor log_2(n) \rfloor)$ into $1 + \lfloor log_2(n+1)\rfloor$?

my bad
Smish
there we go
that seems false
Closed by @tardy flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Smish
still false
sadge
its probably true for a very small region around 1
heavy
Real question : why?
actually i think one of those ends of the interval is open
anyways
I'm trying to prove the correctness of an algorithm for all n greater than one
with induction
just master method it
It's not divide and conquere
what exactly is the alg
i dont see how this cant be done with the master method
first you prove the recursive formula
I don't think I know master method
Have you mapped out what you get for several values?
yes
Also I have to do it with induction
What do you believe the function does?
It returns the number of digits it takes to convert a decimal number into binary
I did some searching around and found that the pattern was $\lfloor log_2(n)\rfloor$
n=0
Smish
the binary representation of the number 10 is 1010 which is four digits
sry my bad $\forall n \geq 1$
Smish
You're given n=0 tho
I asked my professor and they said I can return 0 for the base case even though it is undefined for formula
.close
Closed by @tardy flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why if the sum of the coeficients is 0 then e^x is a solution
.close
Closed by @high ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got 3/2 but i dont know what im doing wrong
Closed by @versed loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what variable am i supposed to derive with respect to?
...
do you guys know how to solve this?
@torn prairie this channel is occupied, please move.
@honest umbra Has your question been resolved?
@honest umbra Has your question been resolved?
Looks like the subscripts define the index of which variable to choose
That is my guess at least
@honest umbra Has your question been resolved?
the subscripts r 0 and 1 tho?
@honest umbra Has your question been resolved?
In the screenshot I see 1 and 2 for the derivatives and 0 for the point of which the neighbourhood is taken
Closed by @honest umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this look right?
Yep looks good to me
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Perfect thanks
Closed by @wary hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys, how would I know which rule to use for this differentiation question?
product rule and a little chain rule
I rewrote it as 3x(4-2x)^1/2
but how would I know this?
It is the product of two functions and there is a function to the power of something
u can see theres a product involved
I know it is a composite function since it is to the power of 1/2
hence I use the chain rule
although how do I know I'm supposed to use the product rule?
Use that rule when you see something like h(x) = g(x)f(x)
When a function is being multiplied by another function so : 2xlnx or xsinx or in your case that function
so in my case I have f(x) = 3x(4-2x)^1/2
does this mean it is a function of a function?
the (4-2x)^(1/2) does need ⛓️
So f(x) = g(x)h(x) in your case
oh ok is that because of the 3x or (4-2x)?
and do I use the chain rule first or the product rule first?
product rule coz its a product of two functions
Well you use the chain rule within the product rule
and to differentiate one of these two function u use the chain rule
ok so after differentiating I got this
-18x(4-2x)^1/2 * 1/2(4-2x)^-1/2
can anyone verify if this is correct?
@median rain
@pliant cedar
Holdup
Nah something wrong with your stuff
If you can show your work ill tell your whats up
I dont understand your last step
And your x variable being similar to your multiplication sign isn't particularly optimal
I just did 3x * 3 * -2 = -18x
You cant do that since these arent multiplicators in both terms
Id put your terms in fractions
-2 , 3x and 1/2
-2 and 1/2 cancel out to make -1
so -3x
Not quite
What is wrong?
Here your first term isnt on the same denominator as your second
Therefore you have to put it on the same denominator
Do you know how to?
yes
Great do that and try again you should be able to get the right answer
why is it -3x?
shouldn't your drawing on the left be -3x
and the right should be positive 3x
Also I hope you know this is not correct, you did uv and not u'v
His x variable and his multiplication symbol can be confused for each other he did that right
No
I'm confused
As to how to put on common denominators or how i got to where i am?
Yeah
hmm
ok so basically let's start from over here f'(x) = 3 * (4-2x)^1/2 + 3x * 1/2(4-2x)^-1/2 * -2
when I multiply 3 * -2 * 1/2 I get -3 correct?
That's how that simplifies
You put the negative with the wrong term
It's 3x * 1/2 * -2 = -3x
Yep youre putting your neg to the wrong term
You were referring to the second term
Yet you put the negative sign on the first time
oh I see
my bad
just curious though why can't I multiply all of them together 3, 3x, 1/2 and -2?
cause 3 is being multiplied, 1/2 is being multiplied, -2 is being multiplied
and isn't 3x being added?
The 3x is part of 1/2 and -2
All getting multiplied
The 3 is on the first term
Separate from 3x, 1/2, and -2
@spare fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Dy over dyx
Derivative at a point gives us slope of tangent line
Is the point pt. Of tangency ie lying on curve
Or any point even outside curve?
the point of tangency lies on the curve
The actual question is can i find slope of tangent passing through a point not lying on curve using differentiation
?
there may be multiple answers
So differential method wont work?
well i can't say for sure. i know it'll sometimes work, and sometimes there just won't be a line
i don't know if for your purposes that counts as "not working"
Thanks
consider the slope of your sought after line in two different ways
let P(p, f(p)) be the point of tangency and Q(q, f(q)) be the point not on the curve
equate f'(p) with slope of PQ from slope formula
@reef karma
@reef karma Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let b represent Bob's current age
and k represent Karen's current age
Can you write an equation or two that relates them based on the information?
consider this
if b is bob's current age, then (b+3) is Bob's age in 3 years
The first sentence could be re-written:
"(Bob's age in three years) is twice (Karen's age in three years)"
What do you fill that chart in with?
variables or like actual constant numbers?
🤔 okay... but Karen's current age is what we want to find, so surely that should be our variable, not her age in three years
This seems like an awfully convoluted way to do this lol
what would you usually do from here?
like in the two years ago column would you do 3y and y ?
Closed by @onyx goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can't even start
try expand and factorise the whole thing
The quadratic they gave you is not in a usual form. Maybe if you expand the brackets and simplify it, you'll be able to factor it
@cosmic crow Has your question been resolved?
I'm not able to factorise it
what equation did you get?
simply (x-7)(x+8) - 34 .... then factorise it again
u'll get ur answer
use prime factorisation
u get 2^a x 3^b x 5^c x 7^d
so the no. of divisors will be (a+1)(b+1)(c+1)(d+1)
I still don't get it
The options are 130 , 330 , 210 , 303
The answer dosent match
what are u getting after prime factorisation
2^8x5^2x3^2x7
6^4 = 2^4 x 3^4
Yeah
Guess I'm just dumb
Then what
use this
10+1 x 2+1 x 4+1 x 1+2
use m = sum of terms/ no. of terms
hmm
And after the subtraction 7 =x
Then the total number of divisors = 2??
Am i right?
x = 6 🥹
Right ???
Closed by @cosmic crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I take scular product between u=(1,2,3) and n=(4,1,-2)
\begin{gather*}
\mathbf{u} = \langle u_1 ,u_2 ,u_3 \rangle \quad \mathbf{n} = \langle n_1 ,n_2 ,n_3 \rangle \[3mm]
\to \mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{n} = u_1 n_1 + u_2 n_2 + u_3 n_3
\end{gather*} If i understood what you mean?
Lixera
no, it means they are perpendicular.
Oh yes ofc
cosA = 0
and the dot product of these guys is indeed 0.
But the question was if U was parallel with my pi
then u must be orthogonal to the normal vector! so the scalar product must equal zero
.close
Closed by @paper sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it's the area of the two green regions above the x axis, minus the area of the middle green region below the x axis
Closed by @zealous kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! very simple question, what would be the formula to solve this?
I'd first evaluate S(10k) + S(10k + 1) + ... + S(10k + 8) + S(10k + 9) for a digit k
Should be k + (k + 1) + ... + (k + 8) + (k + 9)
(k + k + ... + k + k) + (1 + 2 + ... + 8 + 9)
So 10k + 45
(The first sum contains 10 k's and the other is just 9*(9+1)/2)
So we're adding 45 + (10 + 45) + (10 * 2 + 45) + ... + (10 * 9 + 45)
Which is 900
yeah thats what we thought before but i was just seeing if theres a shorter formula of some sort lol
thank you so much!
.close
Closed by @vapid zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello:)
could anyone please help me find my mistake?
send along with question
Send a question and we’ll try our best to help
A soft ball has a mass of 0.25 kg and is thrown horizontally with a speed of 110 km/h. At the moment the ball hits a plate, it has already lost 10% of its speed. Estimate the average force of air resistance during the throw, assuming the distance between the plate and the batter is approximately 15 m and ignoring gravity.
the bottom picture is the correction key, i understand their way of doing it but not sure why mine wasnt right
did you change the velocity you were given into meters per second?
Yes i have
i got a very different number for mv^2/2
well very is a strong word
off by a factor of 100
which i assume is the only issue
since 1.47 ~ 1.5
for mv^2/2 i had (25)(27.5)^2/2
don’t be
Closed by @gusty coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused about this question
Do you know what domain and range is?
the domain is restricted to -1,1
and the range is -pi/2, pi/2 right?
so arcsin(theta) must be in that range
I am pretty sure domain is incorrect...
if the domain of sin is -pi/2 to pi/2
then the domain of inverse sin would have to be -1 to 1, no?
so the inside function must comply with that domain, right?
as the overall function is arcsin(x) ?
Oh sorry, you are right
how would i go about finding the domain of the inside function that complies with the outer function?
-1 < cosx < 1
right?
so arccos(-1) < x < arccos(1) ?
i dont know if im on the correct track?
@queen raven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi how do I prove this?
@oblique knot Has your question been resolved?
Denascite
now you can split this up into three sums
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello



