#help-0
1 messages · Page 119 of 1
yh so from my understanding
let us say we have a function h(x) and we want to find fourier transform of this
Yeah
well what I actually mean is we want to approximate the FT for N frequencies with Nyquist frequency
you know what Nyquist frequency is right?
yes
so let us space the time lets say t_n where $t_n=n\delta$ so equally spaced
3.141593
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
n=0,1,2,3,4,....N-1 is the usual convention (we start from 0)
so in other words we are sampling h(t_n) for n=0,1,2,... N-1
okay so we need frequency to be within nyquist frequency so $f_n=n/(N\delta)$
3.141593
so the discrete fourier transform plugging it into integral $h(t)e^{-2pif_nt}$ and then using riemann sums to approximate the integral
3.141593
yeah im with u so far
actually Im not too good with latex I have some very good notes on this from my lecturer
Ill send you it
coz I cant write integrals and Sigma sum signs using Latex lol
but it is very clear so you will be okay
its okay
\int and \sum btw
and just put _ and ^ for lower and upper bounds
thanks!
alright thanks lots!
will look into it i think i figured out my question
will give ur notes a shot too
thanks again
actually its page 30 onwards
Closed by @sullen badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
got it!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain what splitting the middle term is
writing x^2 - (a+b)x + ab as x^2 - ax - bx + ab
Closed by @rustic junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it should be x != 2
not just below 2
think the question a bit wrong
if x = 2
the denom would be 0, and answer would be undefined
would that be the range as well?
it is greater than 2 because anything below 2 is put in f^-1(x) than the function will be negative and in question it is clearly stated that the function f(x) that is always positive
x > 2
right
ok thanks
.close
Closed by @surreal oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@glad osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
With the derivative of the fonction f(x) (with an optional y ) show that :
@ancient ivy Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got a basic equation but can't find someone who solves it without log its 2^x+2 = 12 how can i solve for x (x+2 is the power)
use exponent rules like $a^{b}\cdot a^c=a^{b+c}$
Jigglyproff
this makes it very easy, but 'in your head' you will still effectively use log
ok i'll try
use () around the exponent. 2^(x+2)
@charred cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @charred cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would love some help on this
out of these three examples why does my formula not hold true on equation 1?

Why was it marked incorrect?
logically thinking if you were purchasing something for 15 dollars with 72% tax it wouldnt cost 53 dollars
should be closer to a fee of 10.80 so a total of 25.80
my forumla allows this to be true for the other 2 equations but not when the % is higher
show the question to these calculations
Ill send the example they gave
This is the equation exactly as they wrote I was basing my math off of
its the calculation of a fee on top of the purchase price in % form
then translated back to a dollar amount
question states "what is the offering price that you would pay per unit"
I dont think this is the solution to your question as I don't understand but you can play around with the slider here if it helps visualize stuff https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jxppgqkwyr ,
it holds between a VERY
low percentage
like above 6% it breaks
like the formula is only true up to 6% ish?
yes
thats so dumb
go on that link and slide the a bar
its extremely unlikely but technically this product could have any % of front end load fee
sounds like a question for google
im reading it cant go above 8.5%
perfect good to know
.close
Closed by @weak widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is it 36^6-26^6
I understand that 36 is 26 letter + 10 digits
But why did we have to subtract 26^6
Nvm
I got it 😭
.close
Closed by @autumn sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
** I can't, partly, understand the logic behind this-**,Correct me if i'm wrong, in this case, we are dividing a whole number by a fraction. The method this girl uses explained (correct me if i'm wrong) Is to get 1 / fraction. Which, logically, because it is how many times the fraction can be inside 1 - (atleast rethorically, because its likely not going to be a whole number) -, when its multiplied by 8 in this case, it's going to give us the answer for the division. However, later in this video, she explains that we can simplify this method by only multiplying the number by the fraction reciprocal. However, this would mean that 1 / (any fraction), is always a reciprocal of the original. I can not understand why this is. And that is what I would like to be explained
So you're basically asking why 1/(a/b) = b/a ?
In this example with a = 3, b = 4
And then multiplied by 8
Exactly
It should be true in all cases
It is
Assume that 1/(a/b) can be represented as a fraction c/d
Then multiplying by a/b we get 1 = c/d * a/b = ac/bd
Therefore c = b, d = a is a solution as ab/ab = 1. So are a bunch of others like 3b and 3d, but they all make the same fraction.
Therefore 1/(a/b) = b/a
@carmine kelp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is the inequality and the PSD matrix equivalent statements? I don't see it
I doubt this is needed for my specific question since it's probably something obvious i am missing, but this is from this wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevanlinna–Pick_interpolation
.close
Closed by @next pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
confused on how they got this line
wdym fixes them
1.9a and 1.9b
ae=a
then do appropriate substitutions for a as indicated
Oh, it's just proof that u can't have two identity elements in a group
sry im a bit confused
yh
similarly, e_1*e_2=e_2
yh
so e_1=e_2
yh
So, let's say in ur group, u have two identity element e_1 and e_2
yh
since we just said that a•e is a
We can say that
a•e_1 = a and also
a•e_2 = a
Right ?
So, in the end, we have a•e_1 = a•e_2
Okay ?
"in a group A closed for operation * it holds that the group only contains one and only one identity element"
When u try to force two identity elements like e_1 and e_2 u just end up with them being equal
also what does it mean for an element to be unique?
distinct, basically separate from each other
I can give few examples of it but do u know multiplicative group of real numbers for it then ?
i think so
just give the examples
Well, distinct means unique, for example we have axiom states that every element has a "unique" inverse
If I pick any number, let's say 3 from muktiplicative group of real numbers, it's unique number will be 1/3 since multiplication of them will give me neutral element
Similarly 4 will have inverse 1/4 note that when u change the numbers, the inverse also changes, that's what it means for inverses to be distinct
Technically, I could also say that inverse of all elements is 0
3×0 = 0
4×0 = 0
......
But it's not "distinct" it's just 0s
i see
dj khaled anoda one
What is the identity element of multiplicative group of real numbers ?
Same with 0, multiply anything by 0 u get same result
3×0 = 0
4×0 = 0
5×0= 0
trivial
But it doesn't satisfy the a*e = a
If you took e = 0
Yep, but there's also a fundamental identity it breaks
Apart from a•e
And the identity it breaks is also the reason why 0 is not e
And also, that identity will explain what "unique" means
Another way to say would just be set of all a is bijective to set of a^-1
That's one way to say what unique invserse means
Hmmm fair fair I guess, maybe I'm just tripping on reading that, knowing how it should look
Is this always true for addition and multiplicative groups?
Yeah
That's generally how you'd write the identities and inverses
@steady basin are u in university ? 
ye
1st year
semester 1
That's wonderful ^°^
hbu
I wanna go to uni too ❤️
Of course, there's e.g. S_n, the set of permutations of a set n, but I haven't seen it written like the multiplication way w/ "e = 1"
Senior Year Highschool in India ❤️
Thank you ^°^
Groups 
@steady basin Has your question been resolved?
im trying to do this question
so first off imma show if its abelian
which means that the operation X is commutative correct?
What a complex question 
thats not the same as the question is it?
since ad - bc is not the same as bc - ad
ie doesnt that mean that it isnt Abelian?
or have i made a mistake
?
Hmmmm 
this is even more funny now
lol
u get my point tho right?
,w (a+bi)*(c+di)
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
Anyways think they should have that def as (ac-bd, ad + bc)
My saviour 
Yeah voting
on their definition
r u taking the piss
not u chartbit
look at this
and i just solved the associativity thing
...
so i gotta do it again now
You know what, I can never say I’m bad again after seeing that
Even I’m not that bad 😒
Like how long does it take to check the product of complex numbers ffs
lol , SA is very anger , relax man 😆
it's happened
You have to hope that they don't make any mistakes on the exam paper


so im trying to prove G1 associativity
is this correct?
but anyway is there an easier method
seems like ms did an easier method
Hmmm, imo not really, unless you spot things? What did they do, skip steps?
Skip some steps it is then
imo just expand those you have there and they should be "obviously" the same
If you show they get to the same thing then you're done 
so for G2 which is identity element
do i do (a,b) x (1,0)?
and (1,0) x (c,d)
?
to both
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Yeah, hmmm 
so (a,b) times something has to equal (1,0)
in terms of the group definition of X
hmmmm
cuz (a,b) x inverse = (1,0)
Yep, that already looks like pain to try and find that way tbh 
hmmmm
I wonder
Think about it for a bit
Remember the whole mention of complex numbers and everything
What's the inverse of a + bi as a complex number?
1/a+bi?
make the denom real?
wait sry gimme sec chartbit
might have a method
had a lightbulb
moment
@pseudo ice
how do i solve this sim eqs lol
That's pretty peak imo, wouldn't do that tbh
it is solvable 
ok chartbit
lets go back to ur method
lol
My guess is that you're to notice the above, but...
...I'm interested now 
That said, via mine, you're matching (a,b) to a + bi and so on
,w rref {{a, -b, 1}, {b, a, 0}}
it's right 
Oh damn fair enough 

Yep that gets you there, whatever way you get there tbh
they did difference of squares 
note how its exactly the same as how they make you "discover" complex inverses (ie. multiply by conjugate, notice that its real, and scale down by appropriate factor)
copypasting my messages into here 😭😭
eh?
you know what youve done.
if i speak i am in big trouble
?
?
?
?
??
he asked me the same question in a diff server and then cross-posted something i said
is it now
im only pretending to be mad about it i dont really care but it is very very funny to me
lmaooooooo
@magic haven if u multiply this inverse by (c,d) tho, it wont give (1,0) will it?
Closed by @steady basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand why we lost a sec^2(x)
I understand the trig substitution and the U-sub, but why did that second sec^2(x) just vanish from the equation?
well what does sec^2(x) =
What's derivative of tanx?
its a trig identity
sec2 x = tan2x + 1
no bc
ooh yeah
sec^2(x) = tan^2x + 1
I see, so it would be (tan^2x +1) tan^6x(tan^2x+1)?
Good good, so the website that is showing the steps is incorrect?
Why would it be incorrect
What can u do with this if u wrote it like this
dx -> du ...
since it doesn't square the tan^2x+1 to accomodate having two sec^x
wait
where does the other sec go
yes bc they are subbing in u for tan
OH we forgot lmao
so u = tan
Yeah
therefor du =...
LMAOOO
Closed by @warm socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i need help with a very large matrix equation that I am not sure can be solved, Im using google sheets to do it in: its a matrix equation of a 1x23 * 23x5 = 1x5 matrix and i need to find the 1x23 matrix(for my purposes its amount * mods = values and i need to find amount)
Im not sure where to start, as i have a very basic understanding of linear algebra
and i cant do non square matrices
there is no unique solution
oh absolutely
but i personally dont know of any software that can handle this size
im sure it is out there
Closed by @vestal adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@plain flame is there an algorithm i could do in google sheets?
unfortunately i have no experience with that
Closed by @vestal adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@heady berry Has your question been resolved?
@heady berry Has your question been resolved?
please help 🥺
@heady berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please help
lim (A + B + C) = lim A + lim B + lim C
But note something about each fraction
What's true about the denominator versus the numerator
You remember what you can do if you have limits to infinity?
You can erase low order terms
Each fraction essentially becomes n/n^2 = 1/n
kk
@signal mountain Has your question been resolved?
question seems a bit dodgy, how many terms are represented by the ... ?
and how does 1/n fit the pattern ?
$\frac{n+k}{n^2+k^2} = \frac{1 +k/n}{1+(k/n)^2}\cdot \frac{1}{n}$
riemann
should be able to turn that into a riemann sum now
@tacit arch sum
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oh
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@signal mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if I were to pay for a service that costs 170.823 USD / hour, how much would it use that service for 45.123 minutes?
@velvet kernel Has your question been resolved?
well an hour is just 60 mins
u can express it the cost per hour as a fraction/ratio
and that would be equal to the ratio of x dollars per 45.123 mins
@velvet kernel Has your question been resolved?
~128.5 dollars
Closed by @velvet kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have some trouble computing the integral $\int_{\gamma} \overline{z}\ dz$ where $\gamma$ is the line $\gamma(t)=t+it$. The result I got from this is 1.
Doing the same integral but for $\gamma_{1}=t$ and $\gamma_{2}=1+it$ I dont get the same results
econo
econo
shouldve been \overline, my bad
my question is: why aren't they the same?
im thinking theyre analytic and should be the same according to the independence of path
what do you think is analytic?
$f(z)=\overline{z}$
econo
its not analytic
yep, not differentiable
Closed by @serene lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve q 12?
wdym omit R0
Closed by @soft ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @mild grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me out with this question
Looks correct
so how would I represent it as an inequality
As a singular inequality?
bad!
-8 >= x >= 2
this is bad. don't ever write self-contradictory inequality chains like this one.
when you chain several inequalities together, they are joined by a logical AND, not by a logical OR.
can you show the instruction video and timestamp
ok
i think there might be an important difference between your current problem and whichever ones are shown there
so is this correct?
You are saying that there is some value x that is lesser than -8 but also greater than 2. Does that make sense to you?
No number satisfies that double inequality
One of the thing that it implies is that -8 > 2
ah see
the thing is
inequalities that look like |x| ≤ a and those that look like |x| ≥ a are actually quite different in the nature of their solution set
oh ok
the solution set of |x| ≤ a is an interval, while that of |x| ≥ a is a union of two rays.
but the shot from the instruction video does not help illustrate that difference.
although, i suppose that solving it the way they've shown, where you first find the points at which equality happens and then draw it on a number line, is valid...
it feels a bit too mechanical
oh I see
although according to my working x > = -8 and x >= 2
So x can be in all numbers from 2 to infinity ?
but it does not appear on the selectable answers
It does
There is indeed an option in the ones u r given where x is between -8 and 2
brb
Is it too bad if I am watching Lex Podcast rn too ?
hahahah that's all good just try not to fall asleep
you should show how you came to this conclusion, particularly how you decided if its <= or >=
ok so as per my working I didn't divide by a negative number hence the inequality sign shouldn't change right
Bigger number gets the bigger side
Smaller number gets the smaller side, don't forget
your working is you solving an equation which is fine
but you haven't shown how you've concluded your answer for the inequality
I think ur answer is correct in terms -8, 2 but what ur problem is how u use ≤ and ≥
yeah I'm pretty confused
how did you arrive at x >= -8?
your right hand side should read $-(3x+9) \geq 15$
ΣAC
and then if wanted to move the negative to the other side your inequality sign would flip
Oh true I forgot about that
But this question for instance
Just has the product as negative on the second equation (right)
How would I know whether to make the whole equation negative vs just make the produce negative?
i want to say something but it feels like theres a lot to address here.
go ahead
i feel like the issue will be with them not really understanding what abs is doing
your school, lex, would apparently have you believe that inequalities are just broken equations and can be treated as equations with an extra complication regarding the sign in the middle.
More or less yes, although I do know that certain algebraic operations may alter the inequality.
well for shame
this kind of thinking betrays you when you try to apply techniques from absolute value equations blindly to absolute value inequalities
are you familiar with the geometric meaning of absolute value?
The distance a number is away from zero on a number line?
Ok, so in the context of this question what am I missing?
Yes
well, you're missing the fact that the inequality |3x+9| ≥ 15 has precious little to do with the inequalities 3x+9 ≥ 15 and 3x+9 ≥ -15.
you could commit yourself to casework, but it requires careful manipulation and thorough understanding of what you're doing. not mere treating-inequalities-as-broken-equations.
this is the kind of picture that i think would be helpful for you to have in mind.
of course, your inequality will require some adjustment to be put into one of these forms (and even then there will be a tiny difference)
from |3x + 9| ≥ 15, divide both sides by 3 to get |x + 3| ≥ 5.
and then realize that x + 3 is the same thing as x - (-3), thus the inequality can be read as "x is at least 5 units away from -3"
does this make sense to you?
Somewhat
can you point to a part that does not make sense?
How would I find the exact inequality of x with the information “x is at least 5 units away from -3”?
so the part that doesn't make sense is "but how do i proceed further"...?
Yes
okay, but is there anything in what i've written that requires elaboration?
No
right
well, i'd like for you to draw a number line
mark on it the point -3
and then mark off points that are 5 units away from it in both directions
do this and show me the result
you forgot the absolute value bars in that inequality
it's |x+3| ≥ 5, not x+3 ≥ 5
anyway
Right
can you now take your number line and illustrate on it the set of all points which are 5 units or further away from -3?
But I just did?
no, you did not. you only marked the points which are exactly 5 units away.
i want you to shade in the points that are 5 units or further away from -3.
Including -3?
what do you mean, "including -3"?
do you think the point -3 fits the description of "a point that is 5 units or further away from -3"?
No I mean I’m just used to illustrating open and closed circles when representing inequalities, hence it’s easier for me to use that notation.
Anyone problem from this?
(b) the question of whether to use open or filled circles at the endpoints really is answered by the statement of the task i gave you
but
(c) -3 is not an endpoint
so asking "do i include -3?" is a bit nonsensical
the point -3 does NOT belong to the set of all points that are at least five units away from it.
So do I just add to arrows on each opposing side of the number line
no you do not "just add arrows"...
look at this
Then?
you're supposed to highlight a subset of the number line
do it in a way that makes it obvious what is highlighted and what is not...
i suppose that could work. but then you risk agonizing over which one you're supposed to flip and which one not.
Look, in the absolute value, the coefficient is just an obstacle, you should simplify the parentheses as much as you can. But don't be blind to addition and subtraction.
On the other hand, when the sign is towards the absolute value, we consider the outer 2 roots....
Why did the signs flip on the last line?
You remember this?
If the sign is on the side of the number, the number goes between the absolute value. If the sign of the side is absolute value. The smaller number is equal to the absolute value along with the negative and the larger number is equal to the absolute value
It's a kind of formula. Try it and you will see that it will not go wrong
@spare fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm doing the advanced euclidean algorithm
but for some reason it just won't work
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tFqTZvXmbf-Ib0IVbuPV3FJWlpdCZt063xrQid-Yaxc/edit?usp=sharing
Google Docs
advanced euclidean algorithm example
a=11 b=7 q=1 r=4 i a b q r x y 1 11 7 1 4 2 7 4 1 3 -1 3 4 3 1 1 1 -1 4 3 1 3 0 0 1 ggT(11,7)=1 Xi+1 - (qi * yi+1) = a * x + b * y = ggT(a,b)
here's the table
the formula ax*by=ggT(a,b) is valid all throughout until I get to the second last line and I don't get why
can someone explain what I'm doing wrong?
Hi
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
yes hi
do you know what I did wrong
<@&286206848099549185> someone help out please 
what are you struggiling with
go to ur channel
go helpv9
@alpine sable if you still need help in 10 hours I'll check it out
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Balls
equate left and right side
how do i get rid of the power
why did you do this
was I not supposed to econs
epanco*
expnd*
expand*

noooo
see equate constant terms and terms with x seperately
yp
10 hours?
man that's a lot
no
if are using product rule atleast find derivative of both terms
(uv)' = u'v+ v'u
or u can use quotient rule
and yo have to integrate y
not the result you got from differentiation
and for integration you have to simply y by using value of 10x-6 in first part
@wanton pebble is it possible to do them using neither product / quotient rule
because we weren’t taught those
i dont know
these are basic rule
so you were taught integration but not product rule?
they aren’t included in the syllabus im being taught
okie
Combining the Product and Quotient Rules Differentiate Techniques
I should be able to solve the question
without using any of the two
rules

what’d I do with x next
@viral pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
dwdw
right lets start from the beginning and note down
what we know
so lets give AC and AB's length the variable y
We know m = 15 degrees
so what do we notice about
triangle ACE and triangle BDE
they're congruent
so what rule do we apply
uhhh
there are 4
you mean angle angle angle?
so for the SSS rule to apply
what do both triangles need to be
ill give you a website to refer
so you want to apply the AAA rule
this is the only option i see
well
we know both are right angle
and none of the triangles sides are equal
we have to use the AAA rule
yea
so we know both shapes have the angles 15,90 and 75 in them
Now we move to the triangle
ABE
what angle can we first find out
AEB
and what would it be
105
y
good
as you said earlier. though i dont really understand how did you find out CAB was isosceles
well
lets apply pythagorus theorum then
so we know
the hypotunese
is 2y
so c^2 = 2y^2
wait... what triangle are we talking about now?
ACE
ill show you why
so we know c = 2y
and we know both angles
so what rule do we use to find out a and b
SAS?
i mean ASA
uhh
hint: sin tan cos
oh
do you know?
no im afraid i dont know the sines theorem
thats it here
ight
so what one can we fill out
wait
no im being stupid im
im being dumb
you were right
we use sohcahtoa
yipee
dwdw mbm
so we know the hypottunese
we know all the angles
what side we finding
AC?
cos15?
but we're left w 2 variables now
well no lengths are given
no measurements are needed if we make y = something
bc no matter what we make y the equation will work
hm
i think there is a way to solve this without trig
it's from a 7th grade math book
there is
y know how?
Closed by @lilac iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bro all these math equations are too complicated for me i joined because i thought i was gonna get sum yr 7 math💀
whyd it pin
Bro this is a help channel
Don't text in this channel
Read #rules
the auto pin by the bot is intended to make it convenient for helpers to keep track of the original question
.close
Closed by @vague mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@prisma laurel wait do you have any questions?
yes whats pi?
pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter
uh i dont understand so im going to google how to explain pi for 6 year olds thank you though
True but u can ask for help too
which is mainly why ppl join
@prisma laurel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do 4
@polar breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's wrong with $n=1$? Then the inequality is true for each fixed $\varepsilon>0$.
RiemannZeta
To clarify, I understand the question to be:
Fix $\varepsilon>0$. Does there exist an $n_\varepsilon\in\Bbb N$ such that $\frac{3}{10}-\varepsilon<\frac{3}{10^{n_\varepsilon}}\leq\frac{3}{10}$?
I'm not sure your question makes much sense. Once $n=2$ or larger, you're looking at $3/10^2=0.03$. In order for this to make sense, you'd have to take $\varepsilon$ larger (as opposed to smaller). So $n=1$ is the only sensible choice.
RiemannZeta
Closed by @vagrant sand
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do 49 ^ .75 without a calculator?
use properties of exponents
0.75=3/4
rewrite .75 into a fraction and properties of exponents
Express 49 as 7^2
You will have to calculate square root manually in the end
By the standard method
supposedly the goal is just to simplify (and not give a decimal approximation)
I'm not understanding, generally 49 * 49 would be 49 ^ 2 right so how is 49 ^ .75 not just 49 ^ (2*.75)
oh wait that gives me 343
thats correct
(7²)^3/4= 7 ^3/2 = 343 ^1/2
wait why would I have to square root I'm confused
$49^{\frac{3}{4}} = \sqrt[4]{49^3}=\sqrt[4]{7^6}=\sqrt{7^3}=7\sqrt{7}$
how did you do ordered roots again
Kel.plush
there
Yea it's better to reduce √343 as 7√7
wait so how do u get 7 * sqrt(7) without a calculator
its 7²*7
so 7 * sqrt 7
and sqrt 7 in decimal value you gotta use an algorithm
i did one last year that i completely forgot unfortunately
note that you didn't have to explicitly cube 7
did as in learned
√(7×7×7)= √(7×7)×√7=7√7
considering exponent laws again,
7^(3/2) = 7 * 7^(1/2)
wait wait let me explain the original problem was this 49 ^ 3/2, I don't like fractions so I turn them to decimals in my head automatically which is 49 ^ .75 it says answer is 343 which is correct
but the only problem is I can get that answer easilly
with a calculator
but this is just practice for the test, of which I can't use a calculator
yeah 3/2 is 1.5
You made a mistake in converting it into decimal
oh wait ye I'm thinking about 2/3
also i dont think theres a human way to compute decimal exponents
thats 0.66666....
it's fine I got 1.5 the first time I jsut for some reason remembered and typed .75
But okay so this is the problem
so I literally cannot do it that way
😔
Oh thats y i said .75
49 ^ (2*.75)
@acoustic compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the range of p:x ->-2|x+4|+10
notice how -2|x+4| is always negative
so you want an x value that makes this 'least negative'
and that will give you your maximum value.

there is a pciture of the graph which looks like a upward arrow, like -x^2 but pointy
-2 * |x+4| ...
?
is always negative..
so it would be 2|x+4| +10 and -2|x+4|+10
huh
as it happens when you calculate a function with a mod
if given -2 |x+4| + 10
You can see from observation that IF THERE IS ANY VALUE INSIDE THE ||
then we will be subtracting from the 10
10 - 2| SOMETHING |
if something is 0
then we have a maximum of 10
this will then piss off to negative infinity on both ends
,w plot -2|x+4|+10
hence your range is (-inf,10] ig
If you pull the - out or even expand the function you have to remove the mod.
@rugged pebble Has your question been resolved?
@rugged pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
