#help-0

1 messages · Page 119 of 1

alpine sable
#

but from what i am seeing online

#

it boils down to convention or whatever

waxen osprey
#

yh so from my understanding

#

let us say we have a function h(x) and we want to find fourier transform of this

alpine sable
#

Yeah

waxen osprey
#

well what I actually mean is we want to approximate the FT for N frequencies with Nyquist frequency

#

you know what Nyquist frequency is right?

alpine sable
#

yes

waxen osprey
#

so let us space the time lets say t_n where $t_n=n\delta$ so equally spaced

ocean sealBOT
#

3.141593
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

waxen osprey
#

n=0,1,2,3,4,....N-1 is the usual convention (we start from 0)

#

so in other words we are sampling h(t_n) for n=0,1,2,... N-1

#

okay so we need frequency to be within nyquist frequency so $f_n=n/(N\delta)$

ocean sealBOT
#

3.141593

waxen osprey
#

so the discrete fourier transform plugging it into integral $h(t)e^{-2pif_nt}$ and then using riemann sums to approximate the integral

ocean sealBOT
#

3.141593

alpine sable
#

yeah im with u so far

waxen osprey
#

actually Im not too good with latex I have some very good notes on this from my lecturer

#

Ill send you it

#

coz I cant write integrals and Sigma sum signs using Latex lol

#

but it is very clear so you will be okay

alpine sable
#

its okay

boreal verge
#

and just put _ and ^ for lower and upper bounds

waxen osprey
#

Page 32 onwards

waxen osprey
alpine sable
#

alright thanks lots!

#

will look into it i think i figured out my question

#

will give ur notes a shot too

#

thanks again

waxen osprey
#

actually its page 30 onwards

alpine sable
#

have a nice one :))

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sullen badge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rustic junco
#

Can someone explain what splitting the middle term is

ruby current
#

writing x^2 - (a+b)x + ab as x^2 - ax - bx + ab

rustic junco
#

Thanks

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rustic junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

surreal oracle
lone heartBOT
surreal oracle
#

why is x > 2 ?

#

not x > 1

#

i dont get it

keen mason
#

it should be x != 2

#

not just below 2

#

think the question a bit wrong

#

if x = 2

#

the denom would be 0, and answer would be undefined

surreal oracle
#

would that be the range as well?

plush wagon
#

it is greater than 2 because anything below 2 is put in f^-1(x) than the function will be negative and in question it is clearly stated that the function f(x) that is always positive

surreal oracle
#

x > 2

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @surreal oracle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glad osprey
lone heartBOT
glad osprey
#

is this working out right so far

#

this is the question

lone heartBOT
#

@glad osprey Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ancient ivy
lone heartBOT
ancient ivy
#

With the derivative of the fonction f(x) (with an optional y ) show that :

lone heartBOT
#

@ancient ivy Has your question been resolved?

formal obsidian
#

Hi

#

Can someone help me

#

Please

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

charred cobalt
#

I got a basic equation but can't find someone who solves it without log its 2^x+2 = 12 how can i solve for x (x+2 is the power)

royal plank
ocean sealBOT
#

Jigglyproff

royal plank
#

this makes it very easy, but 'in your head' you will still effectively use log

charred cobalt
#

ok i'll try

mortal trellis
#

use () around the exponent. 2^(x+2)

lone heartBOT
#

@charred cobalt Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @charred cobalt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

weak widget
#

would love some help on this

lone heartBOT
weak widget
#

out of these three examples why does my formula not hold true on equation 1?

outer lark
weak widget
#

sorry one moment

#

ill repost

outer lark
#

Why was it marked incorrect?

weak widget
#

logically thinking if you were purchasing something for 15 dollars with 72% tax it wouldnt cost 53 dollars

#

should be closer to a fee of 10.80 so a total of 25.80

#

my forumla allows this to be true for the other 2 equations but not when the % is higher

tacit arch
weak widget
#

Ill send the example they gave

#

This is the equation exactly as they wrote I was basing my math off of

#

its the calculation of a fee on top of the purchase price in % form

#

then translated back to a dollar amount

#

question states "what is the offering price that you would pay per unit"

outer lark
#

it holds between a VERY

#

low percentage

#

like above 6% it breaks

weak widget
#

like the formula is only true up to 6% ish?

outer lark
#

yes

weak widget
#

thats so dumb

outer lark
#

go on that link and slide the a bar

weak widget
#

its extremely unlikely but technically this product could have any % of front end load fee

outer lark
#

sounds like a question for google

weak widget
#

I've tried that haha

#

thanks for your help though

#

i appreciate it

outer lark
#

im reading it cant go above 8.5%

weak widget
#

perfect good to know

outer lark
#

from 'FINRA' rules

#

👍

weak widget
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @weak widget

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

Why is it 36^6-26^6

#

I understand that 36 is 26 letter + 10 digits

#

But why did we have to subtract 26^6

#

Nvm

#

I got it 😭

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @autumn sun

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

carmine kelp
#

** I can't, partly, understand the logic behind this-**,Correct me if i'm wrong, in this case, we are dividing a whole number by a fraction. The method this girl uses explained (correct me if i'm wrong) Is to get 1 / fraction. Which, logically, because it is how many times the fraction can be inside 1 - (atleast rethorically, because its likely not going to be a whole number) -, when its multiplied by 8 in this case, it's going to give us the answer for the division. However, later in this video, she explains that we can simplify this method by only multiplying the number by the fraction reciprocal. However, this would mean that 1 / (any fraction), is always a reciprocal of the original. I can not understand why this is. And that is what I would like to be explained

marsh rapids
#

So you're basically asking why 1/(a/b) = b/a ?

#

In this example with a = 3, b = 4

#

And then multiplied by 8

manic jasper
#

well b/a = 1.3 recurring

#

wait im confused it makes sense

carmine kelp
#

It should be true in all cases

marsh rapids
#

It is

#

Assume that 1/(a/b) can be represented as a fraction c/d
Then multiplying by a/b we get 1 = c/d * a/b = ac/bd
Therefore c = b, d = a is a solution as ab/ab = 1. So are a bunch of others like 3b and 3d, but they all make the same fraction.

Therefore 1/(a/b) = b/a

lone heartBOT
#

@carmine kelp Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

next pulsar
#

how is the inequality and the PSD matrix equivalent statements? I don't see it

next pulsar
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @next pulsar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

steady basin
lone heartBOT
steady basin
#

confused on how they got this line

alpine sable
#

e is the identity

#

so if you multiply one identity with the other, it fixes them

steady basin
#

wdym fixes them

alpine sable
#

1.9a and 1.9b

#

ae=a

#

then do appropriate substitutions for a as indicated

#

Oh, it's just proof that u can't have two identity elements in a group

steady basin
alpine sable
#

e_1 * e_2 = e_1 because e_2 is an identity

#

this comes from 1.9b

steady basin
#

yh

alpine sable
#

similarly, e_1*e_2=e_2

steady basin
#

yh

alpine sable
#

so e_1=e_2

steady basin
#

ight ok

#

think im overthinking it

#

tbh

alpine sable
#

well basic

#

a•e = a right ?

steady basin
#

yh

alpine sable
#

So, let's say in ur group, u have two identity element e_1 and e_2

steady basin
#

yh

alpine sable
#

since we just said that a•e is a
We can say that
a•e_1 = a and also
a•e_2 = a
Right ?

steady basin
#

ye

#

agree

alpine sable
#

So, in the end, we have a•e_1 = a•e_2
Okay ?

steady basin
#

ye

#

then the a's canel

#

so e1 = e2?

alpine sable
#

Yep

#

This basically proves that

steady basin
#

yh kl

#

easy

#

lol

alpine sable
#

"in a group A closed for operation * it holds that the group only contains one and only one identity element"
When u try to force two identity elements like e_1 and e_2 u just end up with them being equal

steady basin
#

also what does it mean for an element to be unique?

alpine sable
steady basin
#

just give the examples

alpine sable
#

Well, distinct means unique, for example we have axiom states that every element has a "unique" inverse
If I pick any number, let's say 3 from muktiplicative group of real numbers, it's unique number will be 1/3 since multiplication of them will give me neutral element
Similarly 4 will have inverse 1/4 note that when u change the numbers, the inverse also changes, that's what it means for inverses to be distinct

#

Technically, I could also say that inverse of all elements is 0
3×0 = 0
4×0 = 0
......
But it's not "distinct" it's just 0s

steady basin
#

i see

limpid spade
#

dj khaled anoda one

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

It can also be 0

steady basin
#

everything times 1 gives the same result back

#

everything times 0 gives 0

alpine sable
steady basin
#

trivial

pseudo ice
#

If you took e = 0

alpine sable
#

Yep, but there's also a fundamental identity it breaks

#

Apart from a•e

#

And the identity it breaks is also the reason why 0 is not e

#

And also, that identity will explain what "unique" means

#

Another way to say would just be set of all a is bijective to set of a^-1

#

That's one way to say what unique invserse means

pseudo ice
#

Hmmm fair fair I guess, maybe I'm just tripping on reading that, knowing how it should look

steady basin
#

Is this always true for addition and multiplicative groups?

alpine sable
#

Yeah

pseudo ice
alpine sable
#

@steady basin are u in university ? pandaThink

alpine sable
#

That's wonderful ^°^

steady basin
#

hbu

alpine sable
#

I wanna go to uni too ❤️

pseudo ice
#

Of course, there's e.g. S_n, the set of permutations of a set n, but I haven't seen it written like the multiplication way w/ "e = 1"

alpine sable
steady basin
#

danggg

#

gl

alpine sable
#

Thank you ^°^

pseudo ice
#

Groups catlove

lone heartBOT
#

@steady basin Has your question been resolved?

steady basin
#

so first off imma show if its abelian

#

which means that the operation X is commutative correct?

pseudo ice
#

What a complex question KEK

steady basin
#

thats not the same as the question is it?

#

since ad - bc is not the same as bc - ad

#

ie doesnt that mean that it isnt Abelian?

#

or have i made a mistake

#

?

pseudo ice
#

Hmmmm thinkies

steady basin
#

lol

steady basin
pseudo ice
#

Yeah I see what you mean, it shouldn’t be that way though

#

Unless I’m being slow haha

steady basin
#

imma prove its a group at least

#

then ill show the mark scheme

pseudo ice
#

,w (a+bi)*(c+di)

ocean sealBOT
pseudo ice
#

Damn you Wolfie 😒

#

Didn’t need you anyway, can work on paper, how bout dah

minor needle
#

for it c is speed of light

#

xd

pseudo ice
#

Anyways think they should have that def as (ac-bd, ad + bc)

limpid turret
pseudo ice
pseudo ice
steady basin
#

r u taking the piss

#

not u chartbit

#

look at this

#

and i just solved the associativity thing

#

...

#

so i gotta do it again now

pseudo ice
#

Hahah, see how all of us spotted that they were wrong 😂

#

They’re really violating

steady basin
#

now this

#

...

pseudo ice
#

You know what, I can never say I’m bad again after seeing that

#

Even I’m not that bad 😒

#

Like how long does it take to check the product of complex numbers ffs

hollow sparrow
#

You have to hope that they don't make any mistakes on the exam paper
opencry

steady basin
#

true

#

lol

pseudo ice
steady basin
#

so im trying to prove G1 associativity

#

is this correct?

#

but anyway is there an easier method

#

seems like ms did an easier method

pseudo ice
#

Hmmm, imo not really, unless you spot things? What did they do, skip steps?

steady basin
pseudo ice
#

Skip some steps it is then

steady basin
#

how do i make this thing

#

look like

pseudo ice
# steady basin

imo just expand those you have there and they should be "obviously" the same

steady basin
#

or vice versa

#

ok

pseudo ice
#

If you show they get to the same thing then you're done QED

steady basin
#

do i do (a,b) x (1,0)?

#

and (1,0) x (c,d)

#

?

pseudo ice
#

catYes to both

lone heartBOT
steady basin
#

ok ive done identity element

#

that was easy

#

now G3

#

which is inverse

#

hmmm

pseudo ice
#

Yeah, hmmm thinkies

steady basin
#

so (a,b) times something has to equal (1,0)

#

in terms of the group definition of X

#

hmmmm

#

cuz (a,b) x inverse = (1,0)

pseudo ice
#

Yep, that already looks like pain to try and find that way tbh ded

steady basin
#

hmmmm

pseudo ice
#

This chat makes interesting reading tho hahah

#

cough cough

steady basin
#

lmao

#

any idea then?

#

or u wanna see MS

#

?

pseudo ice
steady basin
#

ok

pseudo ice
#

Think about it for a bit

#

Remember the whole mention of complex numbers and everything

#

What's the inverse of a + bi as a complex number?

steady basin
pseudo ice
steady basin
#

wait sry gimme sec chartbit

#

might have a method

#

had a lightbulb

#

moment

#

@pseudo ice

#

how do i solve this sim eqs lol

pseudo ice
#

That's pretty peak imo, wouldn't do that tbh

keen plinth
#

it is solvable thinkspin

steady basin
#

lets go back to ur method

#

lol

pseudo ice
#

My guess is that you're to notice the above, but...

pseudo ice
pseudo ice
steady basin
#

might cba in like 5mins

#

spent way too long on this and need to move on lol

keen plinth
#

,w rref {{a, -b, 1}, {b, a, 0}}

keen plinth
#

it's right thinkspin

pseudo ice
#

Oh damn fair enough KEK

steady basin
keen plinth
pseudo ice
#

Yep that gets you there, whatever way you get there tbh

keen plinth
#

they did difference of squares catGiggle

steady basin
keen plinth
#

no normal people just rationalise the denominator

magic haven
steady basin
magic haven
#

you know what youve done.

steady basin
keen moss
#

?

steady basin
#

?

keen moss
#

?

steady basin
#

?

keen moss
#

??

magic haven
#

he asked me the same question in a diff server and then cross-posted something i said

magic haven
#

im only pretending to be mad about it i dont really care but it is very very funny to me

hoary heron
#

lmaooooooo

steady basin
#

@magic haven if u multiply this inverse by (c,d) tho, it wont give (1,0) will it?

magic haven
#

What

#

no, bc its the inverse of (a,b)

steady basin
#

ok

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @steady basin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

warm socket
lone heartBOT
warm socket
#

I don't understand why we lost a sec^2(x)

#

I understand the trig substitution and the U-sub, but why did that second sec^2(x) just vanish from the equation?

manic jasper
#

well what does sec^2(x) =

limpid spade
#

What's derivative of tanx?

proper dust
#

sec2 x = tan2x + 1

warm socket
#

wouldn't we have two of them then?

#

like (tan^2x +1)^2

manic jasper
#

no bc

proper dust
#

ooh yeah

manic jasper
#

sec^2(x) = tan^2x + 1

warm socket
#

I see, so it would be (tan^2x +1) tan^6x(tan^2x+1)?

manic jasper
#

yeah but

#

most likely be writting as

#

(tan^2(x) + 1)^2 tan^6(x)

warm socket
#

Good good, so the website that is showing the steps is incorrect?

limpid spade
#

Why would it be incorrect

limpid spade
outer lark
#

dx -> du ...

warm socket
#

since it doesn't square the tan^2x+1 to accomodate having two sec^x

manic jasper
#

wait

outer lark
#

no

#

it does

manic jasper
#

where does the other sec go

outer lark
#

its changing from dx to du

#

the integrand is with respect to x

manic jasper
#

yes bc they are subbing in u for tan

proper dust
manic jasper
#

so u = tan

limpid spade
#

Yeah

outer lark
#

therefor du =...

manic jasper
#

OOOO

#

YEAH

proper dust
#

LMAOOO

manic jasper
#

no you right

#

when i saw du i thought u = x and idk why

warm socket
#

Ohh i see

#

that helped

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warm socket

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vestal adder
#

Hi, i need help with a very large matrix equation that I am not sure can be solved, Im using google sheets to do it in: its a matrix equation of a 1x23 * 23x5 = 1x5 matrix and i need to find the 1x23 matrix(for my purposes its amount * mods = values and i need to find amount)

vestal adder
#

Im not sure where to start, as i have a very basic understanding of linear algebra

#

and i cant do non square matrices

plain flame
#

there is no unique solution

vestal adder
#

yes i know

#

is there a way to find all solutions?

plain flame
#

oh absolutely

#

but i personally dont know of any software that can handle this size

#

im sure it is out there

vestal adder
#

ok thanks

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vestal adder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

vestal adder
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

vestal adder
#

@plain flame is there an algorithm i could do in google sheets?

plain flame
#

unfortunately i have no experience with that

vestal adder
#

shoot ok

#

ill figure something out thank you

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vestal adder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

heady berry
lone heartBOT
heady berry
#

Please help with part B

#

thanks

lone heartBOT
#

@heady berry Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@heady berry Has your question been resolved?

heady berry
#

please help 🥺

manic jasper
#

good luck

lone heartBOT
#

@heady berry Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

signal mountain
#

please help

lone heartBOT
last ether
#

lim (A + B + C) = lim A + lim B + lim C

#

But note something about each fraction

#

What's true about the denominator versus the numerator

signal mountain
#

riemann series

#

?

last ether
#

You remember what you can do if you have limits to infinity?

#

You can erase low order terms

#

Each fraction essentially becomes n/n^2 = 1/n

signal mountain
#

kk

lone heartBOT
#

@signal mountain Has your question been resolved?

naive valley
#

question seems a bit dodgy, how many terms are represented by the ... ?

#

and how does 1/n fit the pattern ?

tacit arch
#

$\frac{n+k}{n^2+k^2} = \frac{1 +k/n}{1+(k/n)^2}\cdot \frac{1}{n}$

ocean sealBOT
#

riemann

tacit arch
#

should be able to turn that into a riemann sum now

modern topaz
#

@tacit arch sum

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

signal mountain
#

oh

lone heartBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

#

@signal mountain Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

velvet kernel
#

if I were to pay for a service that costs 170.823 USD / hour, how much would it use that service for 45.123 minutes?

lone heartBOT
#

@velvet kernel Has your question been resolved?

sonic ridge
#

well an hour is just 60 mins

#

u can express it the cost per hour as a fraction/ratio

#

and that would be equal to the ratio of x dollars per 45.123 mins

lone heartBOT
#

@velvet kernel Has your question been resolved?

desert iron
#

~128.5 dollars

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @velvet kernel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

serene lava
#

Hello, I have some trouble computing the integral $\int_{\gamma} \overline{z}\ dz$ where $\gamma$ is the line $\gamma(t)=t+it$. The result I got from this is 1.

serene lava
#

Doing the same integral but for $\gamma_{1}=t$ and $\gamma_{2}=1+it$ I dont get the same results

ocean sealBOT
serene lava
ocean sealBOT
serene lava
#

shouldve been \overline, my bad

#

my question is: why aren't they the same?

#

im thinking theyre analytic and should be the same according to the independence of path

worn fox
#

what do you think is analytic?

serene lava
#

$f(z)=\overline{z}$

ocean sealBOT
worn fox
#

its not analytic

serene lava
#

oo

#

from C-R eqs, right...

#

thanks !

worn fox
#

yep, not differentiable

serene lava
#

saved my sanity !

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @serene lava

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

How do I solve q 12?

lone heartBOT
alpine sable
#

Why are we omitting R0 here btw?

#

I got all the answers right by omitting R0

worn fox
#

wdym omit R0

alpine sable
#

Sorry I just realised my mistake

#

Thx

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @soft ether

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mild grove

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spare fern
#

Could someone help me out with this question

spare fern
#

Here is my working

#

I'm just confused on how to represent it as an inequality

lyric stream
#

Looks correct

spare fern
#

so how would I represent it as an inequality

lyric stream
#

As a singular inequality?

spare fern
#

like the selectable visible answers above

#

alright

vale wigeon
#

bad!

lyric stream
#

oh ic

#

sorry

spare fern
#

-8 >= x >= 2

vale wigeon
#

this is bad. don't ever write self-contradictory inequality chains like this one.

#

when you chain several inequalities together, they are joined by a logical AND, not by a logical OR.

spare fern
#

?

#

I just followed what the instructional video did on past example questions

vale wigeon
#

can you show the instruction video and timestamp

spare fern
#

ok

vale wigeon
#

i think there might be an important difference between your current problem and whichever ones are shown there

spare fern
spare fern
alpine sable
# spare fern -8 >= x >= 2

You are saying that there is some value x that is lesser than -8 but also greater than 2. Does that make sense to you?

tacit arch
#

No number satisfies that double inequality

alpine sable
#

One of the thing that it implies is that -8 > 2

fallen verge
#

oh yooo riemann you got honorable?

#

v cool

vale wigeon
#

the thing is

#

inequalities that look like |x| ≤ a and those that look like |x| ≥ a are actually quite different in the nature of their solution set

spare fern
#

oh ok

vale wigeon
#

the solution set of |x| ≤ a is an interval, while that of |x| ≥ a is a union of two rays.

#

but the shot from the instruction video does not help illustrate that difference.

#

although, i suppose that solving it the way they've shown, where you first find the points at which equality happens and then draw it on a number line, is valid...

#

it feels a bit too mechanical

spare fern
#

although according to my working x > = -8 and x >= 2

alpine sable
spare fern
#

but it does not appear on the selectable answers

alpine sable
#

It does

#

There is indeed an option in the ones u r given where x is between -8 and 2

vale wigeon
#

brb

alpine sable
#

Is it too bad if I am watching Lex Podcast rn too ?

spare fern
#

hahahah that's all good just try not to fall asleep

worn fox
spare fern
#

ok so as per my working I didn't divide by a negative number hence the inequality sign shouldn't change right

alpine sable
#

Bigger number gets the bigger side
Smaller number gets the smaller side, don't forget

worn fox
#

your working is you solving an equation which is fine

#

but you haven't shown how you've concluded your answer for the inequality

alpine sable
spare fern
#

yeah I'm pretty confused

worn fox
#

how did you arrive at x >= -8?

spare fern
#

hold on I'll send more working

worn fox
#

your right hand side should read $-(3x+9) \geq 15$

ocean sealBOT
worn fox
#

and then if wanted to move the negative to the other side your inequality sign would flip

spare fern
#

But this question for instance

#

Just has the product as negative on the second equation (right)

#

How would I know whether to make the whole equation negative vs just make the produce negative?

vale wigeon
#

i want to say something but it feels like theres a lot to address here.

worn fox
#

go ahead

#

i feel like the issue will be with them not really understanding what abs is doing

vale wigeon
#

your school, lex, would apparently have you believe that inequalities are just broken equations and can be treated as equations with an extra complication regarding the sign in the middle.

spare fern
#

More or less yes, although I do know that certain algebraic operations may alter the inequality.

vale wigeon
#

well for shame

#

this kind of thinking betrays you when you try to apply techniques from absolute value equations blindly to absolute value inequalities

#

are you familiar with the geometric meaning of absolute value?

spare fern
#

The distance a number is away from zero on a number line?

vale wigeon
#

yes

#

or, more generally, |a-b| is the distance between a and b.

spare fern
#

Ok, so in the context of this question what am I missing?

vale wigeon
#

|3x+9| ≥ 15

#

it's this one that you're doing, yes?

spare fern
#

Yes

vale wigeon
#

well, you're missing the fact that the inequality |3x+9| ≥ 15 has precious little to do with the inequalities 3x+9 ≥ 15 and 3x+9 ≥ -15.

#

you could commit yourself to casework, but it requires careful manipulation and thorough understanding of what you're doing. not mere treating-inequalities-as-broken-equations.

#

this is the kind of picture that i think would be helpful for you to have in mind.

#

of course, your inequality will require some adjustment to be put into one of these forms (and even then there will be a tiny difference)

#

from |3x + 9| ≥ 15, divide both sides by 3 to get |x + 3| ≥ 5.

#

and then realize that x + 3 is the same thing as x - (-3), thus the inequality can be read as "x is at least 5 units away from -3"

#

does this make sense to you?

spare fern
#

Somewhat

vale wigeon
#

can you point to a part that does not make sense?

spare fern
#

How would I find the exact inequality of x with the information “x is at least 5 units away from -3”?

vale wigeon
#

so the part that doesn't make sense is "but how do i proceed further"...?

spare fern
#

Yes

vale wigeon
#

okay, but is there anything in what i've written that requires elaboration?

spare fern
#

No

vale wigeon
#

right

#

well, i'd like for you to draw a number line

#

mark on it the point -3

#

and then mark off points that are 5 units away from it in both directions

#

do this and show me the result

spare fern
#

Okay

vale wigeon
#

you forgot the absolute value bars in that inequality

#

it's |x+3| ≥ 5, not x+3 ≥ 5

#

anyway

spare fern
#

Right

vale wigeon
#

can you now take your number line and illustrate on it the set of all points which are 5 units or further away from -3?

spare fern
#

But I just did?

vale wigeon
#

no, you did not. you only marked the points which are exactly 5 units away.

#

i want you to shade in the points that are 5 units or further away from -3.

spare fern
#

Including -3?

vale wigeon
#

what do you mean, "including -3"?

#

do you think the point -3 fits the description of "a point that is 5 units or further away from -3"?

spare fern
#

No I mean I’m just used to illustrating open and closed circles when representing inequalities, hence it’s easier for me to use that notation.

vale wigeon
#

ok sure but

#

(a) you have not yet shown any intervals on the number line

lavish sky
vale wigeon
#

(b) the question of whether to use open or filled circles at the endpoints really is answered by the statement of the task i gave you

#

but

#

(c) -3 is not an endpoint

#

so asking "do i include -3?" is a bit nonsensical

#

the point -3 does NOT belong to the set of all points that are at least five units away from it.

spare fern
#

So do I just add to arrows on each opposing side of the number line

vale wigeon
#

no you do not "just add arrows"...

vale wigeon
spare fern
#

Then?

vale wigeon
#

you're supposed to highlight a subset of the number line

#

do it in a way that makes it obvious what is highlighted and what is not...

lavish sky
spare fern
#

Oh I see

#

That seems a lot more intuitive

vale wigeon
#

i suppose that could work. but then you risk agonizing over which one you're supposed to flip and which one not.

lavish sky
#

Look, in the absolute value, the coefficient is just an obstacle, you should simplify the parentheses as much as you can. But don't be blind to addition and subtraction.

#

On the other hand, when the sign is towards the absolute value, we consider the outer 2 roots....

spare fern
lavish sky
#

You remember this?

#

If the sign is on the side of the number, the number goes between the absolute value. If the sign of the side is absolute value. The smaller number is equal to the absolute value along with the negative and the larger number is equal to the absolute value

#

It's a kind of formula. Try it and you will see that it will not go wrong

lone heartBOT
#

@spare fern Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

I'm doing the advanced euclidean algorithm
but for some reason it just won't work

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tFqTZvXmbf-Ib0IVbuPV3FJWlpdCZt063xrQid-Yaxc/edit?usp=sharing
Google Docs
advanced euclidean algorithm example
a=11 b=7 q=1 r=4 i a b q r x y 1 11 7 1 4 2 7 4 1 3 -1 3 4 3 1 1 1 -1 4 3 1 3 0 0 1 ggT(11,7)=1 Xi+1 - (qi * yi+1) = a * x + b * y = ggT(a,b)

here's the table
the formula ax*by=ggT(a,b) is valid all throughout until I get to the second last line and I don't get why
can someone explain what I'm doing wrong?

lavish sky
#

Hi

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

alpine sable
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

alpine sable
#

do you know what I did wrong

#

<@&286206848099549185> someone help out please sadcat

rancid vault
manic jasper
rancid vault
#

fractions

#

every kind of fractions

manic jasper
#

go to ur channel

rancid vault
#

addition subtraction multiplication divison

#

mixed

#

simplifying

manic jasper
#

go helpv9

limpid turret
#

@alpine sable if you still need help in 10 hours I'll check it out

lone heartBOT
#

@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

viral pine
#

Balls

lone heartBOT
viral pine
#

could anyone give some pointers on how to go about doing q4i

wanton pebble
#

equate left and right side

viral pine
#

how do i get rid of the power

viral pine
wanton pebble
viral pine
#

epanco*

#

expnd*

#

expand*

wanton pebble
#

10x-6= A(5x-2) +B

#

find A B

#

that was the question right

viral pine
#

wait

#

I wasn’t supposed to equate the

#

y = (10x+6)/(5x-2)^2 together?

wanton pebble
#

noooo

viral pine
#

Ok solved it

#

2 and -2

wanton pebble
#

see equate constant terms and terms with x seperately

wanton pebble
viral pine
#

is part two correct

alpine sable
#

man that's a lot

wanton pebble
#

no

viral pine
#

why

#

how wher

wanton pebble
#

if are using product rule atleast find derivative of both terms

#

(uv)' = u'v+ v'u

#

or u can use quotient rule

#

and yo have to integrate y

#

not the result you got from differentiation

#

and for integration you have to simply y by using value of 10x-6 in first part

alpine sable
viral pine
#

@wanton pebble is it possible to do them using neither product / quotient rule

#

because we weren’t taught those

wanton pebble
#

i dont know

#

these are basic rule

#

so you were taught integration but not product rule?

viral pine
wanton pebble
#

okie

viral pine
#

the calculus im being taught is actually really easy

wanton pebble
viral pine
#

without using any of the two

#

rules

wanton pebble
#

yes

#

put 10x+6=2(5x+2) -2

#

the solve

#

then*

viral pine
wanton pebble
#

see then it become 2/(5x+2) -2/(5x+2)²

#

then u can the u can diff. them separately

lone heartBOT
#

@viral pine Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lilac iron
#

help pls

lone heartBOT
manic jasper
#

so

#

whats the angle rules

lilac iron
#

1 sec

#

this is as far as i got

#

sorry for my handwriting

manic jasper
#

dwdw

#

right lets start from the beginning and note down

#

what we know

#

so lets give AC and AB's length the variable y

#

We know m = 15 degrees

#

so what do we notice about

#

triangle ACE and triangle BDE

lilac iron
#

they're congruent

manic jasper
#

so what rule do we apply

lilac iron
#

uhhh

manic jasper
#

there are 4

lilac iron
#

you mean angle angle angle?

manic jasper
#

so for the SSS rule to apply

#

what do both triangles need to be

#

ill give you a website to refer

manic jasper
lilac iron
#

this is the only option i see

manic jasper
#

well

#

we know both are right angle

#

and none of the triangles sides are equal

#

we have to use the AAA rule

lilac iron
#

yea

manic jasper
#

so we know both shapes have the angles 15,90 and 75 in them

#

Now we move to the triangle

#

ABE

#

what angle can we first find out

lilac iron
#

AEB

manic jasper
#

and what would it be

lilac iron
#

105

manic jasper
#

okay good write it

#

and we know the base of that triangle

#

what is it

lilac iron
#

y

manic jasper
#

good

lilac iron
#

as you said earlier. though i dont really understand how did you find out CAB was isosceles

manic jasper
#

well

#

lets apply pythagorus theorum then

#

so we know

#

the hypotunese

#

is 2y

#

so c^2 = 2y^2

lilac iron
#

wait... what triangle are we talking about now?

manic jasper
#

ACE

#

ill show you why

#

so we know c = 2y

#

and we know both angles

#

so what rule do we use to find out a and b

lilac iron
#

SAS?

manic jasper
#

no calculation rule this time

#

what equation

#

do we use

lilac iron
#

i mean ASA

manic jasper
#

So

#

what would the equation be

lilac iron
#

uhh

manic jasper
#

hint: sin tan cos

lilac iron
#

oh

manic jasper
#

do you know?

lilac iron
#

you mean soh cah toa?

#

oh sines theorem?

manic jasper
#

yes

#

so we know sinA/a = sinB/b = sinC/c

lilac iron
#

no im afraid i dont know the sines theorem

manic jasper
lilac iron
#

ight

manic jasper
#

so what one can we fill out

#

wait

#

no im being stupid im

#

im being dumb

#

you were right

#

we use sohcahtoa

lilac iron
#

yipee

manic jasper
#

dwdw mbm

#

so we know the hypottunese

#

we know all the angles

#

what side we finding

lilac iron
#

AC?

manic jasper
#

yeah we can do adjacent

#

what angle would we use then

lilac iron
#

cos15?

manic jasper
#

yes

#

cos15 = 2y/the adjacent

lilac iron
#

but we're left w 2 variables now

manic jasper
#

well no lengths are given

#

no measurements are needed if we make y = something

#

bc no matter what we make y the equation will work

lilac iron
#

hm

#

i think there is a way to solve this without trig

#

it's from a 7th grade math book

manic jasper
#

there is

lilac iron
#

y know how?

manic jasper
#

yes

#

i can show you

#

@lilac iron

lilac iron
#

oh no thanks, i figured it out

#

i appreciate your help

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lilac iron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

prisma laurel
#

bro all these math equations are too complicated for me i joined because i thought i was gonna get sum yr 7 math💀

prisma laurel
#

whyd it pin

vague mirage
#

Don't text in this channel

gray isle
#

the auto pin by the bot is intended to make it convenient for helpers to keep track of the original question

vague mirage
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vague mirage

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

vague mirage
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

vague mirage
#

@prisma laurel wait do you have any questions?

prisma laurel
#

yes whats pi?

gray isle
#

pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter

prisma laurel
#

uh i dont understand so im going to google how to explain pi for 6 year olds thank you though

keen mason
#

which is mainly why ppl join

lone heartBOT
#

@prisma laurel Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

polar breach
lone heartBOT
polar breach
#

How do I do 4

wanton pebble
#

calculate 2a+2b and 2a-2b

#

first

lone heartBOT
#

@polar breach Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lavish sky
#

What it wants? Because u can give any N number

ocean sealBOT
#

Intru[S]

#

Intru[S]

#

Intru[S]

#

Intru[S]

wise comet
#

What's wrong with $n=1$? Then the inequality is true for each fixed $\varepsilon>0$.

ocean sealBOT
#

RiemannZeta

wise comet
#

To clarify, I understand the question to be:

Fix $\varepsilon>0$. Does there exist an $n_\varepsilon\in\Bbb N$ such that $\frac{3}{10}-\varepsilon<\frac{3}{10^{n_\varepsilon}}\leq\frac{3}{10}$?

ocean sealBOT
#

RiemannZeta

#

Intru[S]

wise comet
#

I'm not sure your question makes much sense. Once $n=2$ or larger, you're looking at $3/10^2=0.03$. In order for this to make sense, you'd have to take $\varepsilon$ larger (as opposed to smaller). So $n=1$ is the only sensible choice.

ocean sealBOT
#

RiemannZeta

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vagrant sand

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

acoustic compass
#

How do you do 49 ^ .75 without a calculator?

minor needle
#

use properties of exponents

alpine sable
#

0.75=3/4

boreal verge
#

rewrite .75 into a fraction and properties of exponents

acoustic compass
#

so just make it a fraction?

#

jeez I hate fractions 😔 alright

#

thanks yall

median osprey
#

You will have to calculate square root manually in the end

#

By the standard method

gray isle
#

supposedly the goal is just to simplify (and not give a decimal approximation)

acoustic compass
#

oh wait that gives me 343

#

thats correct

median osprey
#

(7²)^3/4= 7 ^3/2 = 343 ^1/2

acoustic compass
#

but nvm becuz I can't get that

#

without a calculator

median osprey
#

Now you will have to calc √343

#

Which can be easily done manually

acoustic compass
median osprey
#

To 343

boreal verge
#

$49^{\frac{3}{4}} = \sqrt[4]{49^3}=\sqrt[4]{7^6}=\sqrt{7^3}=7\sqrt{7}$

#

how did you do ordered roots again

ocean sealBOT
#

Kel.plush

boreal verge
#

there

median osprey
acoustic compass
#

wait so how do u get 7 * sqrt(7) without a calculator

boreal verge
#

its 7²*7

#

so 7 * sqrt 7

#

and sqrt 7 in decimal value you gotta use an algorithm

#

i did one last year that i completely forgot unfortunately

gray isle
#

note that you didn't have to explicitly cube 7

boreal verge
#

did as in learned

median osprey
#

√(7×7×7)= √(7×7)×√7=7√7

gray isle
#

considering exponent laws again,
7^(3/2) = 7 * 7^(1/2)

acoustic compass
#

wait wait let me explain the original problem was this 49 ^ 3/2, I don't like fractions so I turn them to decimals in my head automatically which is 49 ^ .75 it says answer is 343 which is correct

#

but the only problem is I can get that answer easilly

#

with a calculator

#

but this is just practice for the test, of which I can't use a calculator

median osprey
#

3/2=1.5

#

Not 0.75

boreal verge
#

yeah 3/2 is 1.5

median osprey
#

You made a mistake in converting it into decimal

acoustic compass
#

oh wait ye I'm thinking about 2/3

boreal verge
boreal verge
acoustic compass
#

it's fine I got 1.5 the first time I jsut for some reason remembered and typed .75

acoustic compass
#

so I literally cannot do it that way

#

😔

#

Oh thats y i said .75

#

49 ^ (2*.75)

lone heartBOT
#

@acoustic compass Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rugged pebble
#

how do i find the range of p:x ->-2|x+4|+10

outer lark
#

notice how -2|x+4| is always negative

#

so you want an x value that makes this 'least negative'

#

and that will give you your maximum value.

rugged pebble
#

x is not always negative

#

that a modulus

outer lark
rugged pebble
#

there is a pciture of the graph which looks like a upward arrow, like -x^2 but pointy

outer lark
#

-2 * |x+4| ...

rugged pebble
#

?

outer lark
#

is always negative..

rugged pebble
#

so it would be 2|x+4| +10 and -2|x+4|+10

outer lark
#

huh

rugged pebble
#

as it happens when you calculate a function with a mod

outer lark
#

if given -2 |x+4| + 10

You can see from observation that IF THERE IS ANY VALUE INSIDE THE ||

then we will be subtracting from the 10

#

10 - 2| SOMETHING |

#

if something is 0

#

then we have a maximum of 10

#

this will then piss off to negative infinity on both ends

#

,w plot -2|x+4|+10

outer lark
#

hence your range is (-inf,10] ig

alpine sable
lone heartBOT
#

@rugged pebble Has your question been resolved?

rugged pebble
#

yes i agree

#

the answer says p(x) <= 10

#

which i guess makes sense

#

thank you

lone heartBOT
#

@rugged pebble Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.