#help-0
1 messages · Page 59 of 1
square root?
r = G x m1 x m2 : F
u can create a channel
What happened to the square root?
.
idk can you help?
No
You're just taking the square root of both sides
r² becomes r
And you just take the square root of the entire RHS
okay
Then all you need to do is plug in the values to find r
what was G again
6.674 x 10^(-11) * 1kg * 1kg : 9,81 then?
Where are you getting 1 kg from?
And why are you setting F = 9.81 for?
That's one of the masses
And don't forget to square root everything
No, only one mass is 5kg
The two masses are the object and the earth respectively
What's the mass of the earth?
Don't forget to square root the answer as well
,calc 6.674 * 10^(-11) * 5 * 5.972 * 10^(24) / 24.53
Result:
8.1241598043212e+13
,calc sqrt(8.12416 * 10^(13))
Result:
9.0134122284516e+6
so thats the distance
Looks right, except it's 9013412.22
That should be the distance, measured from the center of the earth, in meters
okay thank you, can you help me with another question, thats way easier i guess
Sure
Calculate the force with which a body with a mass of 1 kg is attracted when it is 20 000 km above the earth
Well, what's r?
okay
20 000km plus 6000km then
also 26 000 km then
i think i goot use F= G * m1 * m2 : r² again
so F= 6,674*10^(-11) x 1kg x 1kg : 26 000²
i thnik#
You're making the same mistake with the masses
The second mass is the earth
Also, you need to convert 26000 km to m
26000000 then
Yep
Yes
aight now calculate, correct?
If yes, may you do that in the chat right here, please.
,calc 6,67410^(-11) x 1kg x 5.972 10^(24) : 26000000²
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Unexpected operator , (char 2)
oops
6,67410^(-11) x 1kg * 5.972 10^(24) : 26000000²
calc, 6,67410^(-11) * 1kg * 5.972 10^(24) / 26000000²
ycalc 6,67410^(-11) * 1kg * 5.972 10^(24) / 26000000²
,calc 6,67410^(-11) * 1kg * 5.972 10^(24) / 26000000²
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Unexpected operator , (char 2)
bruh
,calc 6.67410^(-11) * 1 * 5.972 * 10^(24) / (26000000^2)
Result:
7.5483720574152
Result:
0.5896024852071
no no worries
thank you
i apprechiate you, gotta go to sleep now, tomorrow i have an english exam
its 18 21 for you now, right? for me its 00 21
good night ❤
,close i guess
@ashen scaffold Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ashen scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve without using L’hôpital’s rule
Idk what that is
Just using algebra
yes
Havent learned that
wow wrote out all
Cot0 is undefined
Oh, you can just divide the top part by tanx
Should be xcotx+cosx not xcotx+x
Then you find the limit of xcotx
Which you just have to know is 1
And cosx is 1
There are some ur steps which I don’t get
A lot of it is just trig identities
Closed by @night mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$z^4=17-12\sqrt2$
do ive to show algebraically how to find the roots
seems bit hard to find the 4th root
how wld i do it if i wanted to show algebraically that one of the roots is sqrt2 - 1
and well the rest wld b arg(pi/2, pi, -pi/2)
yeah that seems good
you write z=re^ic
then r= (......)^1/4
some (a+bsqrt2)^2 = 17-12sqrt2
and c is in U_4
polar coordinates are fren?
a^4+12a^2b^2+4b^4=17
yea but
i mean to get exact real val
is hard
unless u guess the ans n work backwards
oh you want a neat form
yea so this is the 1 bit
the sqrt2 bit will be
4a^3+8ab^3=-12
quite ew
so if i was working nromally id prob find
z^2 first?
my answer would have just been this z=(17-12sqrt(2))^1/4 *e^(i k pi/2)
its ugly yeah
i kinda wanna show its <1
which isnt rly straightforward in that form
and when i wanna sub it into later bits i cant exactly use that
,calc 12 * 1.4
Result:
16.8
17-12sqrt(2)<1
i beg to differ
yeah
(17-12sqrt(2))^1/4 = sqrt(2) -1
but is there an easy way to show that without working backwards?
the easiest way i can think of is completing the square twice
yeah if i had to i would do this too
i think this is the only way
except it's ^4 and not 2
🥣
yeah this is a way that will yield results for this for sure
ye
but i think you knew that
oh yea
completing squ twice
czu the ^4 is horrible
unless thrs a nice shortcut to that
i havent heard of any
yea it's not like gonna take you all day hard, just mind numbing algebra
Closed by @ornate condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
i am reviewing
and this is what i got
the Amp =1 period =2pi and phase shift 3
and when i try to graph it like this
oh wait
i never saw that pi
.close
Closed by @calm willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got a question about finding the domain of a function where f(x) = x^2/|x+1|
does this just mean find the inverse?
i think it means maximal domain in which f can be defined
or what values of x it can take in
normally it just means watch out for division by 0s
or
so find the limit of the inverse function?
what i need to do is find the vertical asymptote so finding the limit would make sense
|x+1|=0
is when x=-1
so u just
f is just defined on R\{-1}```
all points except -1
only point f is not defined
thus this will be the domain
i dont really understand what you mean
so u mean x is real where x cant be -1
yes
ok makes sense
kinda
R excluding 1
-1
but close
what is the difference
I would just write it as
$\left{x\in \mathbb{R},:x\ne :-1\right}$
Caleb.
ye that works
k ty
.close
Closed by @barren rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
31times lol
came looking for help

So
Well its better then saying sad so its appreciated
Word word
so it would be 2sqrt(34 on the bottom right?
thank you guys
was that right?
yikes i was losing my mind over something so small
ill check it right now
Yup
Jesus christ cant believe it was just that
ah, simple mistake lol
preciate you @snow furnace @alpine sable lmaoo much love
you guys should be ranked helpful 😭
@stray remnant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so I have a FOV of angle x, pointing directly (centered on a point, (p,q))
is there a way to calculate the height, from the horizontal, of angle X, that would have a FOV length L ?
x, (p,q), L are all given
what i'm thinking is to have the FOV X slide on the line (that points to (p,q)) until we land on FOV length of L
but i don't know the mathematical solution to that
the coordinates of angle X is also always (0,0)
.close
Closed by @storm plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I go about doing these questions. For A. I determined the answer was zero because I plugged zero where t was, but when I was doing B. I tried plugging in infinity, but how would you do e^infinity. I am quite lost, please help
@hexed cipher Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@hexed cipher Has your question been resolved?
Is this a test!
@hexed cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey yall, can someone help me figure out the right answers here
and why mine are wrong
and which of mine are right/wrong lol
explain how younfound each
can’t confirm deny
ok
looks like test so
yeah if they get feedback on whats right/wrong prob not a test
ok good
yes
same for 2, it goes to -1 from the right
indeed
not entirely sure how to do #3
a limit has to be unique
Hey I need help with Rational and Irrational numbers:(
please ask in an unoccupied channel
k
do you know about epsilon delta definition of a limit?
I do not
ok so the rule is
for the general limit to exist
it left and right limit must be the same
so here itd not the case
but they aren't the same, so does it not have a general limit
Closed by @slow canopy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Good day guys, looking to find height in this problem....
I already have all the vertex/distances. I just lack the height since I do not know and I am not familiar with doing it on a parallelogram
the heighr?
Yes bro
In Euclidean geometry, the distance from a point to a line is the shortest distance from a given point to any point on an infinite straight line. It is the perpendicular distance of the point to the line, the length of the line segment which joins the point to nearest point on the line. The formula for calculating it can be derived and expressed...
@alpine sable
How do I know where specifically? because I could just draw a completely straight line and don't know if it's correct
the distance is implying the shortest distance
so its the distance to the orthogonal projection
that makes a right angle with the line
So you're saying we can do a straight line from a point downwards?
wdym
@atomic horizon Has your question been resolved?
Is there a formula to draw the line. I am not asking about the formula to measure the line
click the link
.
and to draw the line just draw the line that goes to two vertices
consecutive vertices
@atomic horizon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @atomic horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Heyo. I need help.
what is the value of B in x^2 - 49 = 0?
wait but what is B
so does that mean that I will be using 0 for the b?
i meant to ask OP but anyways ig it’s clear to them
.close
Closed by @vast ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i do not understand this explanation.
this is my problem and i do not know how to solve it
or where to find how to solve it
Building a valid argument using rules of inference for quantified statements.
Textbook: Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 7e
Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLl-gb0E4MII28GykmtuBXNUNoej-vY5Rz
ive been using this
or this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oasIqX74Mhc&list=PLl-gb0E4MII28GykmtuBXNUNoej-vY5Rz&index=15
Building a valid argument using rules of inference for propositions.
Textbook: Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 7e
Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLl-gb0E4MII28GykmtuBXNUNoej-vY5Rz
what type of problem is this called. I know what a resolution is but never did anything with compounds like this
(p V q) and ( NOT p V q ) ---> q V r
thts the resolution formula
we will take this as the premise , and if we can conclude F from it, then we have proven this =- F
wait so
if the compound proposition is equivalent , then the compound position is not satisfiable
??
srry im confused
so the steps are
<@&268886789983436800>
so i have a problem i did before
can i show you
bc i need a reference in terms of wht theyre asking me to do
- simplify the premise
- resolution from ur step 2 to 3
- use idempotent law in step 4
- simplify
- resolution
- idempotent law
- conjunction
- negative law
you will come to deny the compound proposition and therefore not satisfiable
i will show u the step
okay
is it okay if i can look up what a negative and idepotent law is
bc i didnt learn that yet
i was using the videos
ok
so i guess she didnt cover it yet
ok srry
wait
.. when they say negative law
does tht just mean the not thing?
F
yeah
false
srry i think ik wht you mean now
i just didnt recall the name
you can continue srry
er i did that didnt i
wait no no
srry im just trying to udnerstand..
i never did a problem like this tbh
only this
this is the closet
i did tht though
o lol
im so sorry but ._. can you take a bigger picture bc i cant see the text as much
your notes
in terms of how you did it
ik the first thing is simplify
i think ill just write it in this format

thank you so much, i see why
may i show you what i did for 24 then
to see if i got the idea right?
U can send it over
we also know that a person y exists such that H(y) is true
however we do not know if person y is lola as it is possible for person y to not be Lola
So we cannot conclude H(Lola) nor the "lola is happy"
So i would say that we do not know that lola is the person for which H(x) is true
why?
oh wait
H(x) be "x is happy" is the same as H("x is happy")?
not H(x) is happy
?
ok
its saying if sometimes x is happy AND lola is happy, THEN lola is happy
youre saying that lola has to be someone
so we assume h(x), this particular x here is happy, and we have the premise where her existentially each affects what we are given, so we assume this is true
but we dont know if the person y is going to be lola
.
but the question doesnt mention y
mm ok lemme explain it like this
as per argument, there exists an X for which H(x) is true , which will indicate that x is happy
yes
in this case we have arbitrarily selected a person named Lola, and thus H(Lola), for which this statement can be either true or false
as per argument, it means that there exists an x and not for all of x
ok
so its saying x is happy, and lola is happy, therefore lola is happy
i still odont understand
lola would be happy regardless of the situation
seomtimes x is happy
and lola, is happy
so bc someone is happy and lola is happy, lola is happy
..?
zzzzzzzzzzzzz idk how to make it clearer
we know that this particular x exists, which makes H(x) true,
but we cannot conclude that Lola , in this case H(Lola) satisfies this outcome
are you saying that lola has to be x for both the first argument and the second argument?
in order to show that lola is happy
?
ohhh
which goes back to this point
okay i see
i think
H(lola) isnt the same as Lola is happy?
wait.. no i still dont get it
H(x) is saying that x is happy
H(lola) means that X is lola
?
yes
But we cannot know that H(Lola) is H(x)
H(x) can be true
But H(Lola) may or may not be true
.. so H(x) is x is happy.. and H(lola) is just lola.. not lola is happy bc we dont know is lola if x
?
H(Lola) is either happy or not happy we dont know
why wouldnt we know is its saying that x is happy
and that lola is x
you plug her name in the saying
(x) is happy
lola is (x)
thts wht H(lola) is
?
v_v...
@green marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @green marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve (x^2+2x)(x^2+x) = 0
I tried foil and got x^4 + 3x^3 + 2x^2
then i took out an x^2 from it
so it became x^2(x^2+3x+2)
then i tried to use quadratic completion on the function inside the paratensis
x^2 + 3x + 1.5^2 - 1.5^2 + 2
so it became
x^2((x+1.5)^2 + 2 - 1.5^2)
IIts easier if you keep the parenthesis
How should i solve it?
The idea is that if you multiply two parenthesis with each other, the only way you could get zero, is if one of them is zero
so, eaither x^2 + 2x = 0
or x^2 + x = 0
Solve these equations, and you have all your solutions!
Iota
but not only -1?
i thought it would be x^2 = -x
then divide by -x on both sides
The easiest way is to put x outside of a parenthesis. That would give you for the second
x(x + 2) = 0
ops thats the first but oki
second one would be x(x+1) , so that would add so we just add the x3=-1
perfect
Thank you very much!
I see
Do you have any tips on where to start when solving such equations?
Actually i got stuck again on another equation
(2x - 4)/(x^2+4x+16) = 0
i took out a two from the upper part so it became 2(x-2)
i tried to do quadratic completion on the lower part so i got (x+2)^2 - 20
your excercises seem harder than they are!
You have a fraction there
How can a fraction be zero
if the upper part is zero?
right! So that makes it an easy equation!
And then you have to remember checking just 1 thing.
so the sloution is just x=2?
Right! And then you should check that 2 is a possible solution.
You are not allowed to get zero under the fraction, so check that 2 is allowed!
If that makes ssense to you?
all right1
Can i ask as many question as i like here? Because i get stuck on almost every exercise
Now i am stuck on x^2 + x - 1 = 0.
I treid quadratic completion, and the pq method and one another method i learned which i do not know the name of but it is like this x= (-b +- sqrt(b^2-4ac))/2a
I either did wrong somewhere or the solution is none of these methods
ye
ask away
or open a new one for a new Q if ud like
u want to find x for
x^2 + x - 1 = 0
?
,w solve x^2 + x - 1 = 0
I actually got this solution
What about 2 + sqrt(x+10) = x ?
How should i square the equation? The only way i can think of is foil
um
u multiply the lhs n rhs by themselves?
2 + sqrt(x+10) = x
sqrt(x+10) = x -2
sqrt(x+10)sqrt(x+10) = (x -2)(x -2)
x+10=x^2-4x+4
then u bring all to 1 side n use ur quadratic formula
I got x= 5/2 +- sqrt(59)/2
,w solve x+10=x^2-4x+4
Is the pq method appliable to all second grade equation?
We call it the pq formula
,w what is pq formula
So the quadratic fomula is the -b +- sqrt .... formula?
well
Yeah, i have this in my book too, but i do not know when to use pq and when to use quadratic
its
since both is applied to second grade equation
the same
always use quad
only quad has an a in front
if u div the a u get that p q formula
pq is a special case of the quadratic formula which is used for a=1
u can say quad formula generalises pq formula
I see
What about the second grades that are not perfect sequares, can both be used then too?
I do not get where i did wrong in the former equation, i got x^2 -5x -8 = 0
then i proceeded with pq formula, 5/2 +- sqrt((5/2)^2+8)
then i got 5/2 +- sqrt(59)/2
and i could not do anything afterwards
so i do not know where i got it wrong
which
x+10=x^2-4x+4
this?
yes
oh that would become -6
Now i got the right answers
i do not know where to go from here
I see
It is not telling me to solve x^2 - 2x - 1 = 0 without using the formulas
i tried to use the perfect square method (a-b)^2 = a^2 - 2ab + b^2
But it doesn't really work
i guess if u want, u can simplify the sqrt45 and fraction, but apart from that questions is done
u have to solve x^2-2x-1=0 without using the formula?
Yes, without using any formula
okay so note that (x-y)^2=x^2-2xy+y^2
can you manipulate x^2-2x-1 to have an expression containing the form of (a-b)^2 + smth
pay attention to the -2x to find what a and b would be
Correction: without using any quadratic formula*
yeah we wont use any quadratic formulas for the solution
think about completing the square
almost correct, but it should be (x-1)^2, not just x-1
(x-1)^2 = 2
x-1 = sqrt(2)
x= sqrt(2)+1
Indeed,
x1 = 1 + sqrt(2)
x2 = 1- sqrt(2)
yup u got it
Closed by @sturdy harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys
Deep.
the reason why is X's value is 1 and -X value is -1?
no x can be anything
can -x be any integer thats not negative?
yes
can -x be 0?
-x can potentially be any integer
yea
x can be pretty much anything you want (within reason)
x can be any number you want it to be
even absolute infinity?
what is it
As long as x has an additive inverse
ok i have another question
second thing ive always been thinking
what is the half of zero?
if u have 0 cake n u divide into 2 parts, each part is still 0 cake
mathematically speaking
0 x n = 0, 0 x 1/2 = 0
a*1/2 = a has one solution: a=0
ok thanks
third thing that im wondering
because we are having like coordinates or smth
what is the value of a straight line?
.
what does value mean?
like we had a thing about slopes and all that where
it was like
y - y, = m(x-x,)
It says the value of a coordinate
oh you mean equation of a straight line
yes
it basically states the relationship between the input x and output y
y = 0×x+0 =0
find the slope and y-int of the line
there is no meaning in your question
and use y=mx+b
To draw a line you need a fixed point and how much it rises. The fixed point is where it crosses the y-axis and the slope is the number in front of the x, that tellse you how steep the line is.
value of line doesn’t mean anything
what if theres no slope
tf
Then the numebr infront of the x is 0
ok
fourth thing ive been wondering is
what is the highest number
that is not infinity
^
oh
@silk frigate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somevody tell me what im doing wrong with 3E in figuring out if its a minimum or a maximum?
HUTAO
Yess ahhaha
NO MIKU
HAHAHAH
I simplified haha
Ajhaha its a pfp suggestion from a friend, trio matching pfp
the -4
💔
To -1 and +4
im so confused
thrs no -4 riginally
also if u factorised it shld be
something(somethingelse)
miku is bac
to crash
- find first derivative
- set first derivative to 0
- factor
Closed by @fervent fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
btw
whats 1st derivative test
isnt it
2nd derivative
for nature of stationary pts
yeah then find 2nd derivative
:o
also
whats with
factor
factorize ?
yeah
ig that cld work
idk the factorised is horrible to find derivative of tho
n normally u just quadratic
ok
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When you are integrating 1/ x*sqrt(5x-2) for example, why would you set u as the whole sqrt(5x-2) and not just the 5x-2 inside? I know one works and the other doesnt but for future questions what makes you want to set u as the whole thing including the sqrt? Because usually with substitution you set only the inside of the sqrt as u
.close
Closed by @woeful wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think its possible just looks like torture
yhea
i don't know how
ah yes
Can u show ur work and where ur at?
anyone know what I-2I-I-5I is?
@left bronze Has your question been resolved?
@left bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @left bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t know how to approach this
pretty sure it helps that X can be written as (10^k - 1) / 9
for any k in Z
*N
$\frac{10^{k}-1}{9}$
Jelle
for example if k = 1 then X = 9 / 9 = 1
Yep makes sense
$p\left(\frac{10^{k}-1}{9}\right)^{2}+q\left(\frac{10^{k}-1}{9}\right)+r=\frac{10^{l}-1}{9}$ and maybe multiply by 81 and do mod 10
Jelle
where was this problem from?
@remote bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Deep.
the last two

