#help-0
1 messages · Page 32 of 1
?
well ok
so
since be is
b is
(-2, -1)
and m is
(4, 2)
the difference is
6 and 3 right
so C is
(10, 5)
wait am i right or
omg
bro its the first time
im right
for like
10 fuckinf yeras
i was always wrong
iwas in extended maths my entire life
you're doing really well
and i was shit idfk how i even
passed i wanted to
kms so many times cuz
i couldnt getthsi shit
😭
I'm barely doing anything except tiny hints
ok so
to prove its right angle
i can prove that they are
perpendicular
to prove they are perpendicular i need to rpove that
m1 * m2 = -1
right
so slope of AB * slope of AC = -1
AB slope = 1
i just have to prove that AC slope = -1
so
that's one way to do it
A (7, 8) C (10, 5)
you can also try out pythagoras
8-5 / 7-10 =
and see if it applies here
yep
that's the first question solved
pythagoras
and many others probably
pythagoras is slower though
so yours was the fasters
ok lets do 2
on to the 2nd question
idk about the symbol
yes
i mean that doesnt help
cuz 2 variables
and AB = CD
😭
it doesnt help either
fuckkkkkkkkkkkk what do i do
start with CD
o ok
21 = 20/-13 (2) + c
21 = 40/-13 + c
273 = 40 + 13c
233 = 13 c
c = 233/13
uhhh
brb
do what
but then he had to go
:/
i thik he said like
AC = AD or something
ok ineed to do someting for around 10 mins sprry
that is far from correct
ping me when you're back
yea
a - 1 / -16
slope of BD is
b - 2 / -21
a-1/16 = b-2/-21
20/-13 = a/b+1
so uh
tytgfrtyuj
AD = -3 / a - 21
no
where does this 16 come from
AD = a - 21 / -3
AB = CD
b - 1 / -a = 13 / - 20
the solution
heres how my teacher did it
whats the short way
(0-a)/(b+1) = -20/13
yes
but is there like a way to prove it
cuz like
-20/13 can also be -40/26
and then a and b wouldnt work
i mean they would but we cant find the exact values then
ofcourse
we know how CD looks like
now draw AB
with your points
and see if it's as long as CD
it looks like this
they must be equal length
too lazy to connect AD and BC
yea
cant we just find midpoint of AC
AB = 5/4
BC = 32/11
so
now
AB = y = 5/4x + c
4 = 5/4(3) + c
one sec
the easiest way to do it
is finding the midpoint of AC first
breh
28 + 14 / 2, 24 + 36 /2
I'm a bit behind
o
fuc
but let me introduce you a faster way
y = 4/5x + c
hold on
find the midpoint of AC
first
and use D = (u, v)
to find the midpoint of BD
everything will become clear
so uh
yes
but you skipped this
i found it
here
here
okay is correct
yes
wasn't that the last part of the question
AC and DB
BD*
oh
wait we need the intersection too tho
so to find intersection we need to find
equaiton of
yea but that's at (21,30)
we actually used that fact to find D here
yea
i. c
ok i might have to gtg
im gonna brush my teeth
and then we can do the rest on phone
worksheet 2
worksheet 3
ok thats it theres more but they are more easy ones
wanna do this in dms
sure
so that i dont take this help space?
ok add me
im gonna brb in 5 minis
u might have to graph since ill be on phone
kk
@formal hornet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @formal hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close.
@royal tapir Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @royal tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i want to learn Karnaugh maps but i dont know how, any good learning resources for it?
i understand basic programming, and boolean algebra and how to simplify boolean expressions
karnaugh maps dont seem too difficult, its just that there are some minor things that i dont understand that are blocking me from learning it
Karnaugh maps are great, I suggest learning them if you like logic boolean algebra
there are some minor things that i dont understand that are blocking me from learning it
What exactly?
To ask for resources, #book-recommendations may be a better channel (it's fine for non-book resources too)
this video states that because all outputs are 1 when A is 1, A should be part of the expression. However that's inconsistent because that would no long be true if every output in the map was 1
Every group that you make represents a term, then the simplified boolean expression is the sum of these terms. Each term is the product of the variables that don't change in its group
@olive citrus Has your question been resolved?
Here's an example with a table with all 1s as output, you can group them however you like as long as you respect the pattern™
(and group all the 1s of course)
@olive citrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is my work
the question is
Laura, Henry, and Carlos have a total of 106 in their wallets. Carlos has 2 times what Henry has. Laura has 6 more than Henry. How much does each have
.close
Closed by @drifting walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey how can I find the local extrema of this function?
I believe local extremas occur when the derivative of the slope is 0 ? but not sure what to do otherwise
"the derivative of the slope" doesn't make a lot of sense here
you'd just want to refer to either the derivative or the slope
oh
I meant when the derivative of the function is equal to 0
would the x value for that be the place at which a local extrema occurs?
the values that I will get for x?
if you want to know if one of these solutions is a maxima, you need the second derivative
so I need to set the second derivative of the function equal to 0 and solve for x?
for turning points the second derivative is 0
for maxima the second derivative is negative
for minima the second derivative is positive
first you need the first derivative
set that to 0
to find all extrema
then you put these in the second derivative
youcan also analyze sign of first diervative
maximal points first increase and then decrease
i.e. positive first derivative than negativer
calculating the 2nd derivative is unnecessary
not really
if you want to know if it is a maxima or a minima, then the second derivative is the best way
Matter of viewpoimnt
i know there are functions where that is obvious but calculating is advised i would say
only true with simple functions
I think first derivative sign analysis is faster

to each his own
which ones easier to calculate haha?
First derivative sign analysis
You should definitely understand both
and then you see when this is zero...
which will be at x=6/78
and then you analyze signs of all factors around this
exp is always positive
6 - 78x is positive before 6/78
nd negative afterwards
-> maximum
I guess the caveat with the sign approach is that you need the function to factor be easily able to tell the sign
Maybe someone else can explain it more throughly if I was not descriptive enoguh
I will try it in a few , will let you know if I get it
@edgy sand Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We want to divide $a^2(a^{2n-2} +1)$ by $a^{n+1}+1$.
yeah sure, but this is indeed the wrong lace to ask this lol
All I did was substitute b
hoping for more insoriation by seeing it written a nice way
M8732
ye
try small n... n = 0 would work but I think it might not count as positive enough for you. n = 1 does not work. n=2 also does not with a=1
Latex requires {} for grouping terms
$a^{long\ long\ exponential}$
yeah I think it is a bit contentious but I am pretty sure it is not intended for your task lol
I think it is just naming.
You need positive numbers or zero much more ofdten than strictly positive (which is waht people say that believe in zero being positive)
anyway we are digressing
Number theory is not my area but I think it might be very challenging
actually maybe we can find a reason why starting some n it cannot work anymore
which fraction?
btw you are missing a 2 in the exponential
(as I did before I corrected it)
okay so if we consider a prime
then $(a^{2n-2} +1)$ is divisible by $a^{n+1}+1$
M8732
spraguese
Just factoring thouh
There are letters are exponentials
German keyboards have keys for these even
he he he
My question is ... are we allowed ot choose a different n for each a?
a^{n+1}+1
just a^{n+1} is divisible by a
but with +1 you will always get reminder 1
so a is not a factor of it
needed to be prime anyhow for what I was saying
so just to be clear... what I was saying is that if it is going to work at all then I think this must work as well for a prime
however I think it is definitely impossible to find a single n that works with all a
hm
however let's just consider a=2
it is already not easy!
Where does this question come from?
I suspect the answer is (E)
now I am actually not 100% sure IF we allow choosing n depedent of a
but all those fixed choices given DEFINITELY don't work
you can just try with a=2
That was mean to cut away the answer options 
Closed by @toxic axle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No problem 🙂
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is there to "simplify" here to find q and r
only thing would be to factor out and divide both sides by 5 again, which isn't what it's asking
it already said 5m was wrong for q though
@grim delta Has your question been resolved?
@grim delta Has your question been resolved?
He answered you already, you need to close it
@grim delta Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are you missing the chain rule here
looks like you crossed wires maybe
you picked up a constant from the chain rule but it was the wrong one?
or it was the one as if you had pulled out the 1/2 constant
but youve already multiplied it through
you may want to explicitly write out the u-sub to track the constant error
its only off by that afaict
the error is in the substitution
oh
in their result, with ln(10x-2), you should have 3/20
their answer is incorrect
u can simplify it gets absorbed in C
👀
(3/10)ln(10x - 2) + C = (3/10)(ln(2) + ln(5x - 1)) + C = (3/10)(ln(5x - 1)) + M
right but you need to simplify
so both answers are correct
what is the + M?
some other constant
where did that ln(2) go?
(3/10)ln(2) gets absorbed, as stated
absorbed?
I haven't learnt u-sub
the textbook doesn't go over u-sub at all
no need
ur answer is correct
however it can simplified
thats all
I think first time when doing integrals u just guess it out than doing u sub
but if I were to substitute x in with something, i get different answers
like?
like x = 2
u are forgetting there is a +C
oh so would the c be different for the two answers?
yes
o
actually its giving a general for a family of anti derivatives
so is the c on the right side a different value?
yes
but they are both constants
right
so we just use same variable name
oih
i think i'm getting it
so basically, i can just simplify anything and put it on to the constant?
why don't we simplify it to 3/10ln(2) + c instead?
U can
but its not compulsory
which would be the 'simpler' way?
if I were there I would have probably left it like that
so is the textbook just being lame?
nah its just a simplification of the answer just 2 more steps
really doesnt matter for most part
cool okay, that makes sense
thanks for the help. that question really confused my sexual identity
❤️
.close
Closed by @valid stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I solve this?
do you know any limit laws?
such as limit of a sum, or limit of a product, or limit of a fraction...
no
so you do not know, for example, that $\lim [f(x) + g(x)] = \lim f(x) + \lim g(x)$?
Ann
now i do
look up "limit laws calculus"
i don't believe that you actually did as i told you in all of 1 minute
it takes <10 secs to search limit laws
well then apply your newfound knowledge
and if you find that you cant then show what it was that you found so quickly but didnt manage to understand
right
so, yes, apply those here
find the limit of (f(x)+g(x)), then find the limit of 5f(x), then verify that the latter isn't zero, then find the limit of the whole fraction
@vale wigeon
got it
and using the first rule
it would just be the fraction right?
since theres no x?
...??
@sick notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sick notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
Idk
If you factor out the -1, you'd get $i \sqrt{x+3} + 2$
tatpoj
which, yeah, that's as "simplified" as any other expression
That's what I said before
you said x-3, not x+3
i dont understand
Oops my bad
$$\sqrt{-x-3} + 2$$
$$=\sqrt{-1(x+3)} + 2$$
$$=\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{x+3} + 2$$
$$=i\sqrt{x+3} + 2$$
i understand the math
but do they graph to be the same thing?
the original and the simplified equation
because my calculator is not graphing the simplified version for some reason
Do u know complex nos eddie
tatpoj
Graphing calculators don't really like complex numbers
Lol
You need three dimensions to graph a real input and complex output
so a calculator with a 2d screen can't do it
but yes
damn
so anytime i get an equation like this and i am asked to graph it, i shouldn't simplify it??
you were asked to graph y = sqrt(-x-3)+2 ?
yes
Then, forget the complex numbers. Just take the real numbers
wdym
It sounds like your domain is just the real numbers, not complex
So, in that context, sqrt(-x-3)+2 is only defined for x <= -3
If the problem asks you to graph, you can trust your calculator.
Your calculator doesn't like complex numbers, but your teacher isn't going to ask you to graph complex functions
ok thx bro
No problem
@delicate lake Has your question been resolved?
yes babe
Closed by @delicate lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m new to college and haven’t been in school for a very long time and I’m struggling with putting nouns into equations such as 1 of something - 9 of something = 2 of something as well as 1 of something - 23 of something = 60 of something
<@&286206848099549185>
I'm not really sure what you mean (maybe someone else is?) but if you have 5 of one thing like apples minus two of another thing like oranges it doesn't really work cuz u can't compare apples and oranges
Closed by @wooden gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question: Let the graph of g be a translation 2 units left and 3 units up, followed by a reflection in the y-axis of the graph of f(x)=x2−2x. Write a rule for g.
I am confused on how to add the 2 units left and 3 units up to this given equation.
Ive tried converting it to vertex form
but i get y=x^2
so when i add the rest of the translations
i get y= (x+2)^2 +3
I changed x to -x
but when i simplify i get y=x^2 -4x +7
i think im converting it wrong
but idk how to convert
<@&286206848099549185>
nvm i figured it out
.close
Closed by @simple idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is g'(x) the same thing as g(x)'
Well that , isn't '
o:
maybe they wanted to wrote $h(x) = \frac{1}{g(x)}$ , then h'(1)
does that mean it's not g prime
Shihab
you see ?
OHHHHH
I get you
like it's a comma separating the definition of h(x) and then it's telling me to find h'(1)
yes
thank you!
nope
I mean it makes sense since I have to use a table
yes
oh woah
Closed by @hollow dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help explpain this? 🙂
Why do 1/(2-x)<3 become 1<3(2-x)
they multiplied both sides by (2-x)
Ah thanks for help 🙂
Why is there 2 cases?
I would have come to (-∞, 5/3)
and stopped there
.clos
.close
Closed by @tulip gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@boreal stag Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@boreal stag Has your question been resolved?
Anyone help?
Could you please zoom in a little bit - my eyesight is very bad.
what dont you understand
to get to X after one throw, do you need to go counterclockwise or clockwise from W
(clockwise)
given the rules, you need to throw a 1 OR a 2
therefore since the probability of throwing a 1 OR a 2 is 2/6 = 1/3, the probablility is 33.33% or 1/3
to get to Y after two throws
what are the two options you have
go counterclockwise on both or go clockwise on both, correct?
the probability of going clockwise on both is (1/3*1/3) = 1/9
the probability of going anticlockwise once is 4/6 (can get 3,4,5, or 6) = 2/3
so the probability of going anticlockwise on both is (2/3*2/3) = 4/9
1/9 + 4/9 = 5/9
is this good explanation? @boreal stag
Closed by @boreal stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, the trig idenity says sin^2 u + cos^2 u = 1
Yep
Yes, in that case u=t/2
@vernal dragon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vernal dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i int e^2t * sin(2t) dt
@vernal dragon Has your question been resolved?
Integration by parts
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Andrea276
wait
what if x^-1 in the denominator is used as the numerator like this
(-1)+1 = 0
x^0 = 1
You can't bring x from the denominator to the numerator like that
why?
It's a sum, not a product
so it has to be a number?
No, you can't do that in general
If you have $\frac{2+5}{3+6}$ you can't bring the 3 up and do $\frac{2\times \frac 13+5}{6}$
Try to rewrite all x^-1 and y^-1 this way
yea but the ^-1 becomes ^1
Andrea276
Doesn't change
You can't do that
You have sums, not products at the numerator & denominator
.
$\frac{\frac 1x + \frac 1y}{\frac 1x - \frac 1y}$
Andrea276
Can you see how you could simplify numerator and denominator even further?
Try to find the common denominator between the fractions
Andrea276
hmm
Try to rewrite the fractions at the numerator with a common denominator, then do the same for the fractions at the denominator
like rationalizing?
Andrea276
No I'm just talking about adding two fractions
Add those like you would add 1/2 and 1/3 in this example
Andrea276
alr wait
xy at the denominators is correct though
Yw
Closed by @tight herald
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$5sin\left(5t\right)-\frac{5}{2}Q=\frac{dQ}{dt}$
Alkose
Hi all, need help finding a solution to this differential equation using the integrating factor method
What have you tried
I'm not really sure where to begin, since all the other examples I've done so far were in the form
f(t) + g(t)Q = F(t, Q)
However I'm having trouble finding where the g(t) is, since it doesn't appear to have a g(t) and to me looks like it's in the form:
f(t) - Q = F(t, Q)
Yeah okay, so that means the next step should look something like this?
Alkose
So what would it be instead?
Alkose
Like this?
I(t) is the integrating factor, which is used to solve differential equations via the integrating factor method
It's a linear differential equation
In a differential equation dy/dx + f(x)y = g(x), the integrating factor is e^∫f(x)dx
This is taken from my textbook, would it be this?
That's not the integrating factor, no
But you'll use it later
This calculus video tutorial explains provides a basic introduction into how to solve first order linear differential equations. First, you need to write the equation in standard form [y' + P(x)y = Q(x)] and then identify the functions P(x) and Q(x). Next, you need to determine the integrating factor I(x) using the formula I(x) = e^(integral o...
So in my case it would be?
dQ/dt + f(t)y = g(Q), the integrating factor is e^∫f(t)dQ
No
You have to write the differential equation in the form dQ/dt + f(t)Q = g(t)
In the video, y was the function you were trying to solve for
In your problem, it's Q
Okay thanks, I'll rewatch the video and see If i can do it
@fleet edge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\sqrt{x^2}$ should be $\pm x$ no?
help
help
no
its |x|
sqrt(4) is 2
no
why isnt it -2 tho
^
in a square root you take the positive
$\sqrt{x}$ is principal square root
the square root that you are using is called the principal root, this is defined to output a positive value
4 has two roots, 2 and -2, but if you do it as a term, a term always has just one value
Analytic Continuation of zeta
this is why i said earlier sqrt(x^2)=|x|
yeah and that got me confused
principal square root over reals is defined to always take the non negative value
if i want it to get a + - what is the square root called
if youre solving x^2=4 it might look a bit different
its called splitting into two terms
well, unfortunately, there isn't explicitly such a thing. If we do use it, we will specify that we are using a multi-valued square root
x^2=4 <=> x=2 or x=-2
this is especially useful when working with complex numbers, where square root can be ill-defined
oh ok i think i get it
i just remembered that i explained this thing to someone 3 months ago
lel
my brain is lagging from learning quadratics
like 2 months ago
anyways..
thanks
.close
Closed by @languid bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What did I do wrong? Supposed to be: (0,1]
Send the problem
is there a reason why you refused to simplify x+1-2x into 1-x?
What the question asks
assuming solid means + and dashed means -, you have the signs the wrong way around for (1-x) @tulip gazelle
the question asks to solve the inequality (x+1)/x >= 2
@vale wigeon So minus should be positive?
@stark ermine Cause im a bit tired. Didnt get much sleep when I fucked your mom all night
@stark ermine What your mom also told me
@stark ermine To bad this question isnt as easy as your mother
@stark ermine please stop harassing other users.
calm down yall
you are insulting other users for no reason. you are being rude.
@tulip gazelle the (1-x) thing should have its signs reversed
in the future maybe it's best to ignore things like that
Yeah im sorry about the jokes, just had to
I inverted mb
wait
\begin{equation}
\frac{x+1-2x}{x} \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{-x+1}{x} \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow -x²+x \geq 0 \Rightarrow x≠0 \Rightarrow [1;+∞]
\end{equation}
everytimecrusader
\begin{equation}
-x²+x \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow x \geq 1
\end{equation}
everytimecrusader
X cannot be 0, since division by 0 does not exists
and X assumes values greater or igual 1,
it isnt x>=1 though
how
it should be 0 < x <= 1
this was said when the question was asked too
The inequalitie was $\frac{x+1}{x}-2 \geq 0$
everytimecrusader
X cannot assume 0
-x^2 + x >= 0 gives you 0 <= x <= 1
then you remove 0
not that the method is particularly great
-x²+x>0 then x²>=x then x>=1
|| (x+1)/x = 1 + 1/x >= 2 implies 1/x >= 1, this can only hold for positive x so then 0 < x <= 1 ||
thats a much more direct method
X need to be different then 0
well i didnt include it
X>0 do not include negative values
\begin{equation}
\frac{x+1-2x}{x} \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{-x+1}{x} \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow -x²+x \geq 0 \Rightarrow x \leq 1 / x≠0
\end{equation}
everytimecrusader
$[1;0) \cup (0;-∞)$
everytimecrusader
?
the answer is (0, 1]
Yeah
you can graph it out and check for yourself
Wich is this
im not sure why you have -infinity there
Becuse it can assume all negative values
it cant
How
im saying the answer is only (0, 1]
this is the explanation
what doesnt make sense to you
My doubt is this x>0
|| "1/x >= 1, this can only hold for positive" ||
x needs to be ≠ 0
yes x cannot be 0
but the inequality is not satisfied when x is negative
hey there my rotund friend @ornate condor
You are right, i was forgetting to relate the conditions both nominator and denominatior.
gonna review this topic
大家好!
sorry i dont speak chinese
same
@tulip gazelle Has your question been resolved?
@tulip gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to start with
idk where to even start solving this simultaneous equation
ok
with square roots you always wanna try to isolate that term on one side of the equation
so in this case you can just do -y on both sides
and end up with sqrt(x)=7-y
well try putting all the y on one side
and all the values that don't have y attached on the other