#competition-math
1 messages Ā· Page 33 of 1
if you want to groupsolve you are welcome to, just uhh i am slightly busy
,ti
The current time for lyheart is 12:39 PM (GMT) on Thu, 17/07/2025.
hm
Oh yes do you know
The montenegro #2 hard carried

@high goblet this is the British score btw
yeah i saw
that's quite good for the UK
he taught me olympiad geom for a while btw
lmao what
hey LY!!
yes
hi!
he taught us how to complex bash
lol how do you know him?
nice teacher
hatewatch moment
some tuition centre posted him in our lesson
for marketing

pro
took over from geoff smith who was busy running IMO for the last few years lol
pog
singapore has quite a few
there are 3 good schools and each school has one good math oly teacher
the rivalry is insane
of course i orz my own schools teacher
i think he is the best of the 3 in terms of personality

get ghost pinged
what
I remember usa2
ong bro
what
these random ahh pings
its just a whoph whop wweowoeow eowo whopw ehop weow eowhop
mbmb
huh why does this take me to the main imo page?
website's currently down it seems
who do u think wins
surely china right?
i mean US have 0 P6 solves, china have 2 iirc
how do u know
live scoreboard, except it seems to be down rn
no all chinese
tho
they just all asian
thats like the same with like every olympiad
It's a contest; if it was not difficult there wouldn't be any clear winners, just a whole bunch of participants who all get perfect scores.
just focus on solving problem sets and read/rewrite solutions until you understand them
generally you shouldn't need much theory but if you don't know like special right triangles u should focus on that lol
Does your school have a math team?
how do i start getting to a level to a point i can speedrun papers and get 90+%. (currently getting 60% on FM core pure šš)
what is FM?
further maths
what country r u from?
usa
i presume amƩrica?
got you
so thereās A-levels in UK. the 3 subjects i pick are maths, further maths and physics. Further maths is just maths on steroids. much harder. but i struggle so much with it
and i want to get to a point where im getting 90% at least on papers
but 3D vectors keep bending me over
I only learned about 2d vectors so far
wht grade are you in?
donāt do 3D, that shi will send you sideways for months
iām in year 12 which i THINK is grade 13
already created a 3d replication of Pascals triangle
well iām going into the next year in september
oops
do you know about dot product?
Yeah
okok thatās used in 3D vectors often
tbf iād like to know how the content differs from Uk to USA
IDK im in 9th-10th grade rn
I think it's easier in the US but I honestly don't know
I tend to just not pay attention in math class until the day before the quiz where I see if there is anything I don't know
gcse or whatever is definitely harder than the SAT for instance
I'm not sure about class difficulty though
yeah the SAT looks easy
yeah id agree with that
math part at least
turtle are u typing a paragraph?
yeah I kind of forgot how to use derivatives a bit
I wasn't typing lol
I tab switched it probably said I was typing
oh
dang really
yeahhh
lucky smh
if iām honest, how do i differentiate the difference between calc and non calc
I haven't taken calc so if ur asking that it probably means they're all too hard for me but
but like
lims/derivatives/integrals
yeah
maybe but I could solve this one
assuming I'm allowed to use sum of consecutive squares that is
never really knew only knew how derivatives worked, so I couldn't use the integral well
itās proof by induction, so you treat is as if you know nothing and you prove true for letting n=1, Assume true for n=k and therefore prove true for n=k+1 by subbing into both sides and getting them equal
i quite like that topic as it follows the same steps each question
thatās if itās a series question tho, if itās prove that something is divisible by an integer, you follow different steps
guys where do i go to ask for math tips
wym divisible by an integer
can't u just plug it in
no
okay! uh. so hi guys is it okay if iām in middle school iām barely gonna start 8th grade and iām really struggling in 7th grade math. i got masters on my texas starr test for reading but did not meets on my math. any suggestions?
you have to prove it
you follow the same steps by subbing in n=1 and showing thatās divisible by 5 for example for both sides. then you assume true for n=k. then for n=k+1 you set it as a function. you minus the f(k) function from f(k+1) and eventually it will be divisible by 5
sure
right this makes sense
and is induction required for problems like this? because I would just synthetic divide if it's polynomials or use some other method if possible
okay how can u help
it tends to state āprove by induction that f(āfunctionā) is divisible by 5 (for example)
with what?
so then the only way would be by induction
are u going into algebra or prealgebra
rightt
gn
no
bet
If there is a problem you don't understand and it isn't an official test then spend time figuring it out.
otherwise just move on
yeah some of ur problem solving should be focused on solving harder problems, and for the rest of it you should time yourself and treat it like a real competition
uhh I mean idk work on what you struggle with and understand concept
Try to figure out reasoning behind stuff(for longer than youre comfortable with), but if you canāt ask gpt
^ and if thereās specific stuff you dunno just send it into help channel or here and someone will explain it
Not sure what level of math you are at, but from the rough grade range Iād highly recommend going through AOPSās Prealgebra book (and by go through I mean actually read the book like a normal book and attempt to solve all the practice questions). This will serve as a very solid foundation for late middle/early high school math
Hi guys,
Are there any math olympiads for high schoolers that have past papers that I can use for practice, I'm preferably looking for a website with a lot of these olympiad-style questions,
Cheers.
Art of Problem Solving has AMC and AIME
also you could try Mathiscool
its gone now
fair
Im an Italian 9th grader, i want to train for next year olympiads, I have some experience in the Bocconi's circuit but im not that good. Where do i start from?
aops
thanks
Something happened with their domain
oh thatās really unfortunate
Yeah, I think their https expired at some point and they had to renew it
guys how old should i be before preparing for maths olympiads, and does anyone have any tips in practicing?
Can someone help me with this question?-How many ways can you pick three different numbers from 1 to 1999 so that any two numbers in the chosen set are at least 9 apart?
Im getting 71732 and im not sure if this is correct
Earlier, the better
ive done some thinking and i think the answer is 1980lowercase sigma + 1979lowercase sigma ... until its 1 sigma but after that im not sure how to solve it
do lots of problems
also while the most prestigious contests tend to be high school level
if youāre in middle school Iād recommend looking around for contests at that level too
the earlier you start exposing yourself to these contest problems the better
my school isnt the greatest for that and im in uk so tutors or mainstream is practically impossible at my fianancial state
ive done lots of uk maths challenges for my age group and i typically score close to full marks
but i dont have insighful methods for harder olympiads at my age group which holds me back and im basically smarter than my maths teachers in highschool now which leads me into my dilemma
have you looked at the contest collections on AoPS? thatāll be a huge wealth of practice material
I doubt this is correct, as you have over 1,000 options for the third number considering the first 2 are the smallest, and another 1,000 for the other 2
so at least 1 billion
Yeah i misread the question on that one, it should at the "most" 9
ohhh
at mosr
I was thinking it was 19811980/2 + 19801979/2 +... 2*1/2
I forgot Discord doesn't like the * symbol it thinks we are italicizing
"olympiad-style"
I got 161589, IDK if it is correct tho
and a lot of national olympiads too
popop614
I aspire to do the smae
is in team usa
no way
this is prob the first and last time someone from jtoh will ever make it to an intl competition
ngl
wat is jtoh
i used to
ah. Whats ur hardest?
topz
nice. Mine is only ToTL
planning on jumping to ToRER tho
Why did you leave, and why don't you think anyone else from JToH will be on the team?
fair, has been a bit since I played
I play jsab :D
whas tha
Just shapes and beats
oh a rythm game?
I used to play FNF
They made some nice updates
use divisibility rules for 9 and 11 basically
Alternatively: When there's an odd number of digits, reversing them moves each digit by an even number of positions.
Moving a digit d from position m to position n corresponds to adding dĀ·(10^n-10^m).
If n>m, then 10^n-10^m written in base 10 looks like 99...9900...00 with n-m nines and m zeroes; when n-m is even this is obviously a multiple of 99.
If m>n, then subtract dĀ·(10^m-10^n) instead, again a multiple of 99.
In other words we want combinations of p and q such that p+q | 100p+q. That is the same as p+q | 99p. But if p and q are coprime, then p is also coprime to p+q, so that means p+q | 99.
We want the largest possible p, which means we ought to look for p+q=99 with q as small as possible.
q=11 doesn't work, we get p=88, not coprime to 11.
q=12 doesn't work, we get p=87, not coprime to 12 (both are divisible by 3).
...
(100p+q)/p+q is an integer basically, each digit is 1-9
how did you get p+q | 99p from p+q | 100p+q?
If 100p+q is a multiple of p+q, then 100p+q-(p+q) is also a multiple of p+q.
what do y'all think of deepmind getting a gold
smart
It is tempting to view the capability of current AI technology as a singular quantity: either a given task X is within the ability of current tools, or it is not. However, there is in fact a very wide spread in capability (several orders of magnitude) depending on what resources and assistance gives the tool, and how one reports their results.
One can illustrate this with a human metaphor. I will use the recently concluded International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) as an example. Here, the format is that each country fields a team of six human contestants (high school students), led by a team leader (often a professional mathematician). Over the course of two days, each contestant is given four and a half hours on each day to solve three difficult mathematical problems, given only pen and paper. No communication between contestants (or with the team leader) during this period is permitted, although the contestants can ask the invigilators for clarification on the wordiā¦
how did they calculate area of isosceles triangle
didn't you ask this exact question before
anyways because CEF is isosceles, you have FX = XE
but by similar triangles, say CX = XE
so FE = 2 * CX
area = 1/2 * CX * FE = 1/2 * CX * (2 CX) = CX^2
cut that triangle in half and arrange the pieces to form a square of side length CX
What do i have to find in the figure, the area of pentagon or the area of circle
the maximum possible area of a circle inside the pentagon, rounded to the nearest integer
aka literally what it says in the problem statement
39
U guys are smart
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Oops. Should I not have done that? Was it correct?
yeah i think 39 is correct
Certainly not correct -- the correct answer has to end up being pi times some algebraic number.
you can use trig to find the radius, the rest is pretty simple
rounded to the nearest integer though
oh. I did it algebriacly
with substitution
I guess they overlap, pythagorean theorem and memorizing the special triangles
yay i did q1 and q2 of 2012 imo in 1 hour
yayayayayayay
q1 was trivial took me 45 min
got lucky for q2
Yessss
Could someone offer me a hint on how to go about this
based on the question I know there's a maximum value of n after which we can always find a counterexample
so I thought of reciprocals like 1/a 1/b but that didn't lead to much
now I've not really got a clue
wait I'm confused. Shouldn't it be infinity, because the higher n is the lower the right side of the equation is?
that's why I thought of reciprocals
yeah, lets say it is 1,1,1, then n could be literally any integer and the right side would be lower
sqrt(1+sqrt2)ā„nth root of1, any root of 1 is one
or is it saying every value of a,b,c
It is
oooooh
I get it, the higher n is when 1ā„a,b,c, tte higher the value if the right side is
its all or nothing, if n gets too high, the lowest the right side can go is 8th root, so when n increases, I think it doesn't stop
pretty sure it is infinity, as even with the lowest value on the right (c ā„ b ā„ a), which would be sqrtc 4th root b, and 8th root c, if you had an n higher than 8, it would be smaller (without the multiplying), if we consider multiplying (abc) to a max of cubing the largest number, then n=24 would be the lowest, 24/3=8, and keep one variable, with the lowest being c with 8th root. From then on, the right side would be less than the left
ayyy nice
tbf IMO 2012 Q2 is ||easier the less theory you know lol||
||i mean it's just AM-GM, but the results don't seem to suggest it was that easy, so maybe ppl just wasted time trying other approaches lol||
but yeah no gg
yes i got lucky
||i was gonna sleep and just wanted some random progress so i used amgm||
š
Anyone in here doing MAT ? UKMT ? BMO1 ?
I have like ~ 3 months before Iām fkd š„²
gl for the MAT!
i mean SMC/BMO1 are just for fun so don't stress over it
BMO1 and TMUA here
Iām trynna get into Oxford i need to stress for everything ngl š
Nice nice
SMC ?
Yeah
Sent friend request we can help each other out !
SMC/BMO questions can be asked here, FWIW
I mean, this is literally what this channel is for
JOIN FTW GAME PLS
HIIII im looking for some help regarding a maths olympiad i am participating in and wanted u guys's helpp
? What help bru
!da2a
No need to ask āCan I askā¦?ā or āDoes anyone know aboutā¦?āāitās faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
MAT and hopefully BMO
SMC--->BMO1
Unlikely but bmo2 asw
basically do you guys have any idea abt ioqm
??
like ioqm is Indian Olympiad Qualifier in Mathematics which is the first stage in reaching IMO
and this is my first time giving that exam soooo i need help with materials and topics and all
just a thought maybe we can split sqrt(x) into sqrt(x)/2 + sqrt(x)/2 so am-gm removes the sqrt
i think by repeated am-gm we get RHS >= a/2 + b/4 + c/8
and then more am-gm gives us a/8 + a/8 + a/8 + a/8 + 4(b/16) + 8(c/32) >= 12 * 2^-16 cbrt(abc)
so then we can do some stuff
Go look at past contests
And see what itās like
hey! Same here, if you find anything useful please do let me know
my teachers told me to mainly just focus on 12th grade chapters
thatās all
how is pre college mathematics for ioqm?
i'd say its very much doable compared to other olympiad papers
one of my friends (benchmate) has cleared ioqm in the past and he was saying that learn the basics from VOS (vedantu olympiad school) and then solve rmo pyqs because they are the most relevant for ioqm or smthing
absolutely can i dm you cuz he sent me some resources
yes please!
Can someone solve me the problem 8x²-y²=7 (x,y non negative integers)
difference of squares
maybe
@obsidian plank 8x**2 = 64 - 7 = 57. So X would be 64 and Y would be 7 (square root of 57)
so X, Y = 64, 57 or 8x, 7
there are decimal points
but it says integers only
No, because both factors become irrationals
Thereās a solution at ||x=y=1||
Anyways I solved P vs NP guys and sent it to clay mathematics institute and CST2025: https://www.academia.edu/130474412/Solution_to_P_vs_NP_by_John_Mathews_Hearle_12271997
pretty scary the peasants don't know this
no way thats real lol
Orz
Yeah but I need all the solutions
On mine????
I call
yes
No it's real
Itās obviously correct bro
its 200% correct
1 mil dollars!!!!
yeah sorry for doubting the guy
I solved all the other ones too lol
vythan!! the absolute goat!! solving all the millenium questions
I mean they not hard actually
š
for example poincare
piss cannon
a rose ellipse does not match a 3 circle
and yetis closed and smoth
š
because when you rotate it 30 degrees the radius is no longer the same
so broke that one too in bout 5 minutes
absolute stud !
If a^2+b^2=c^2. Then a^2+b^2=E/m
E as in energy?
that's just saying E1+E2 = Etotal
But E = MC**2 is not correct because E = V*C and while the mass contains the multiplied voltage and current x mass there is a F = MA which takes movement into account for energy which is equal to voltage which is force and acceleration which is not necessarily related to current.
movement is actually related to frequency
so a large star will pull in a another star based off it's FREQUENCY not it's voltage or current
In otherwords a tiny UV radiation star will easily dominate the electromagnetic field of a low frequency star like earths sun
<@&268886789983436800> troll
Not a troll, I'm just not a robot.
Unlike you, I invent like einstein, not just read einsteins math and take it for granted.
Please keep channel on topic, thanks
generalized Pell's equation
E = gamma mc^2
you should be able to find 2 recursive series
who knows the rule
How do you do this
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
kinda looks like they make that special rectangle in every row
probably something with that
what property does the segment EF have
I don't think a large improvement over public models is really indicative of much at all
there's definitely reasons to be skeptical of this result specifically though -- I saw somewhere that it's worse at non-IMO problems of a similar difficulty
looking for it
theres another bot??
The exact new unreleased OpenAI's and Google's models? Would love source for that. I would update then. Afaik the only currently public results are the IMO gold medal results.
the terence tao analogy is great
more people should read this
property of chords: the perpendicular bisector always passes through the center
thales' theorem: if two points lie on opposite ends of a diameter and a third point is chosen, the triangle connecting those three points is a right triangle
I don't like these problems
pattern recognition problems are icky
not real math
<@&268886789983436800>? canāt tell if this is just a scam but either way clearly off topic
Where can I find a list of competition inequalities with solutions (that are sorted by difficulty)?
Hello, may I get a hint for this problem? Source: problem 319 Putnam & Beyond
I have tried proving it is monotone by induction without success
Maybe not sorted by difficulty but I have a pdf of inequalities: https://artofproblemsolving.com/articles/files/MildorfInequalities.pdf
Make the right triangle by connecting AF and then realize the answer
I know the rule
Top triangle on the 4 8 3 diagonal, bottom triangle on the 1 6 8 diagonal, top line on the 3 5 7 diagonal, bottom and top line on the 2 5 7 diagonal, side lines on the 2 5 9 diagonal, bottom triangle on the 1 5 9 diagonal
That should cover it
So 9 should be bottom triangle side lines
best i can think of is making the log to log_3/2(4/sqrt2*2/3) then take out the 2/3 and rationalize the denominator to get log_3/2(2sqrt2)-1
then add 6 at the end to get 5+log_3/2(2sqrt2)
I have no idea what u mean
wana vc?
Number the squares 1-9 like a keypad
thats what I mean
hmm
but this is just combining it
I think there is supposed to be a way to remove the log
@unkempt dove
i don't think there is one
Yeah me neither
The infinite square root would simplify to
X = (ā4-1/ā3 x )
So now we can square both sides
X²= 4-1/ā3 x
X² + 1/ā3x - 4 = 0
Now this is a quadratic
Idk
What to do next
Maybe solve the quadratic
But I am getting it wrong
what
wdym we already did this
We already simplified the infinite sequence
Does the solution want you to remove the log or is it good enough as just one log
oh oh oh
I know the problem
I missed something when I converted it into latex
There is another 1/3sqrt(2) on the outside of the big sqrt
Ok lets do it again then
-3sqrt(2)(18S^2-4) = S
54sqrt(2)S^2+S-12sqrt(2)=0
108S^2+sqrt(2)S-24=0
S=(-sqrt(2)+sqrt(2+96*108)/216
uhh
S = (sqrt(2)(1+sqrt(5185))/216
6+log base 3/2 (1+sqrt(5185) + log base 3/2 (sqrt(2)/216)
smth like that
10370 = 61 * 17 * 2 * 5
wait thats all wrong
18S^2 = 4-S
oops
18S^2+S-4=0
(2S +1)(9S-4)=0
S=4/9
@unkempt dove
The answer was 4
š¤¦āāļø
Anyways the important part of this kind of problem is just to know how to find the answer of an infinite series
its pretty simple if you arent dumb like me
Haha it's india
So you shouldn't be š
Surprised
woah
Thanks for the help
What is the most efficient way to break a triangle into rectangles is what its asking basically
from an imo problem
Imo?
olympiad
bye
God bless you
Ye nothing is hard for you fr
I mean in context
like p3 is a monster but this one doesnt seem as bad
wait.
this is a lot harder than I thought
because there could be a better setup than diagonal squares
yeah there definitely is because this setup only needs
wait.
its the same?
p6?
both require 8?
cambridge?
imo p6 2025
Wait a minute
is it always the same no matter the configuration you pick?
maybe
im edexcel, just finished igcse's
I think it might always be n-1 * 2 for any odd sized grids
or maybe for any grids in general
no matter what squares you pick
if you use a greedy algorithm
ohhhh I figured out why
because when you pick a square, there is the section above and below, right and left
and if that section is 0, thats why its n-1 * 2 no matter which square you pick
but proving that could be hard still idk
ohhh maybe you could prove it by saying that the above below left right sections are different for every missing square so it has to be n-1 * 2 because there are only 2 0 distance outliers for each direction and they can be the same too
because if you go up down or left right rectangles or big or small it doesnt matter
hi
<@&268886789983436800> advertising
guys can you tell me if this proof is correct
Basically Iām trying to prove the sum is equal to 2^m times n choose m
I think you got the right idea, but it's not complete. For example, you didn't explain why you chose k out of n instead of m.
Also, in general, you didn't explain the role of n.
The first analogy doesn't make much sense
the second one does
Where is your proof of this?
actually this looks really fun to try and prove
Wow
I think I found something useful
Here is something I have proven on the way to the final conclusion
wait a minute
bruh
Just prove this one instead
ok
well
that makes it a lot simpler ig
wait I found a way easier way to prove it
proved it.
these are combinations right?
yeah
ty
yes that's the joke in competition math
thinking
as soon as I realized you can just shift it up to become the same as some pascal row above it becomes trivial
yes it is correct
if you want the proof for sum k = 0 to m of m choose k = 2^m that is pretty trivial
just use pascals to see that each row doubles the amount of 1s or smth
Yes it's a very interesting problem to prove though!
thanks for the problem
Can you explain what the sum is supposed to mean in context of a problem?
I'm not sure how formal it is, but this can be proven combinatorically very easily
because the sum represents all possible subsets of a list with m elements
& each element can either be included or discluded
wtf no??????
it's like one hardest IMO p3/p6s in the last few years
Did you find it?
This is rage bait
well that's what i've heard
haven't actually attempted the problem, but like the stats show like really not that many ppl solved it
and like P4 and P5 really weren't that hard this year
can anyone give me a roadmap for exams like imo or jee if someone know as it would be beneficial
Prepare for jee i would suggest
Imo in india is more of a gamble
The team has like 4-5 members, and the syllabus doesnt even allign with jee
Focus on Chem, Physics and Astronomy Olympiad tbh
Zero risk High Reward
@austere nimbus what do you study?
Pcm
I got approx 50 in NSEP in 10th
98.6 in boards
So i g i m a reliable source
class 11 or 12
1 and 2 chapters are easy
Bro i have done almost full 11th in 10thš
i am starting 11 in 9th
Im just practcising now and revising
done 2 chapter and trigo
Good move
I would advise you to do quadratic in math aswell
And pnc
i was doing polynomials in maths and starting linear equation in two variable but started sets and logs
that was easier
I dont even consider linear eq in 2 var a chapter bro
Its a pre requisite
Also how much are u getting
In tests?
11th wale tests mai?
me 9th me hu
Hey guys
hello
Bro pdhne se kuch nhi hota
Tests toh de
11th ke tests de
Kahi test series lag walo
What is bro studying ?
which books
cengage and all
bruhh cengage is boring asf
Bro waise tumhe yeh sab apne teachers se ouchna chahiye
So they can see ur level and reccommend books
I mean hes a beginner
my teachers says ncert exampler
These books make Math look dull , i would recommend starting with TAACOPS by Paul Zeitz
Woh hone lage toh aur ache level ki krlo
i do rd
Never heard if it so cant comment on it
Though A DAS GUPTA is a gtreat problem book
Jee adv type
What is your motivation for studying Maths >
Not good for jee
i do that for school lvl
Yes
Bro why are u pushing JEE onto this guy
Coz he was asking?
yup
May i ask you why does JEE interest you ?
maths is good at jee lvl
and i find maths fun
Your fav problem if any
In which class are you in though?
11th
Nice
you ?
Same
What are your interests /hobbies ?
Watching tv
Anything specific
I am like 90% sure you havent watched breaking bad
i have
Which stream though?
How much are u getting in ur coaching tests?
boards me 98 kese aagaye?anything specific??
Nah
Just books pdhli
Ncert
10th is not tough
Neither is 11th
Bro in which state are u?
Nhi
Free ke number bat te hain
Though dont become overconfident
me underconfident rehta hu
PCM
Which state though?
up
Coaching ke test mai kitne aate hain?
Not good enough
Waha pe facilities achi hai by gods grace, toh sabko easy lgti hai 10th
Which Coaching do you study in
None
Just
Local coachings
For mainly tests
Adv level
Which books are you currently reading ?
Jd lee
Same here
I mean its too good , do u read the original one
cool
Knowledge is never enough
I mean if youu are getting low marks in tests
First thouroughly read coaching notes
And then practice
Then move on to extra books
"Extra " books , books are my primary source
Okay then thorughly follow them
Thiugh jd lee orignal isnt that syllabus oreinted
I recommend you to read sm other thing aswell
I am reading the Sudarshan Guha one
Maybe jd lee sudarshan guha
What abt Maths and Physics'
Math i just do my coachuong assignemenrs and black book
Phy i do my coaching suirs book
which coaching
What is your fav subject ?
some local one he says
Local
Math
Nice
Same but lately Physics interests me more
Phy was my fav last year
im going to pace rn
Though it changes
Which coaching are u studying in ?
Pace
nice š
Which state guys?
maharashtra
Hmm nice
you?
Haryana
nice
so ur prepping for jee too?
Hmm
what chapters do you like
Its fun ig
ok lol
Yeah the reason why it doesnāt have many people solving it is because it is so thinking based
just like last years problem 5 had an unusually low amount of solves for such an easy logical reasoning/strategic thinking problem
this kind of problem 6 relies more on visual spatial reasoning and thinking rather than the typical problem which can be solved with tons of experience in traditional competition math.
But it is a very beautiful problem for these exact reasons.
Itās the kind of problem that is likely also much harder to prove than to solve
Itās just more of the problem I think is a lot more accessible and good for the kind I like most to solve, so I think itās easier than most other p3/p6ās
Somewhat similar in difficulty to the p3 from last year, but slightly easier I think
Aalag banda hai bhai
only the prodigies remember me
the openai IMO news hit me pretty heavy this weekend
ļøļø
ļøļøi'm still in the acute phase of the impact, i think
ļøļø
ļøļøi consider myself a professional mathematician (a characterization some actual professional mathematicians might take issue with, but my party my rules) and i don't think i can answer a single imo question
ļøļø
ļøļøok, yes, imo is its own little athletic subsection of math for which i have not trained, etc. etc., but. if i meet someone in the wild who has an IMO gold, i immediately update to "this person is much better at math than i am"
ļøļø
ļøļønow a bunch of robots can do it. as someone who has a lot of their identity and their actual life built around "is good at math," it's a gut punch. it's a kind of dying.
ļøļø
ļøļølike, one day you discover you can talk to dogs. it's fun and interesting so you do it more, learning the intricacies of their language and their deepest customs. you learn other people are surprised by what you can dā¦
i solved imo p1
I AM OFFICIALLY BETTER THAN A PROFESSIONAL MATHEMATICIAN
that would double count words that have multiple As
it double counts the 75 words of the form AA_, A_A and _AA. and then it triple counts the single word AAA
which is why itās off by exactly 77
interesting
so I'd have to consider the cases of A's frequency separately
,calc 25^2 * 3 + 25 * 3 + 1
Result:
1951
alright ty
complementary counting (which is what they did) is probably easiest bc it removes casework
bc what if it was like 7 letter words š¬
yeah I just got a more lengthy question
learnt it the hard way
how
professional mathematician my ass
1959 imo p1 š„
"i dont think i can answer a single imo question"
right because professional mathematicians are expected to know every single IMO question from every year
that's on the professional mathematician entrance exam isn't it
you see these people crying about AI and how it's gonna kill us all and then you check their bio and see they're building it lmao
yeah it is
think he means recent ones
i mean this guy is at paradigm so he doesn't fit that archetype but it is funny
what web do you use for these problems?
But isnt the IMO for high schoolers? I tough it was easy for atleast college student lvl
unfortunately idk what that is I just looked at their most recent rt and it was about building math ai
Olympiad-style problems often depend of fairly esoteric tricks that most professional mathematicians have no particular reason to know by heart.
Math knowledge areas are not linearly ordered.
?
Bro there is so much wrong with this post its insane
IMO and competition math require a completely different skillset and abilities than most college+ math does
Well I doubt most IMO participants know all of them either, all you really need to know is some theorems which comes with experience, and then the rest is problem solving ability
(in certain cases some tricks could still be very useful though)
Did you guys ever compete in imo?
Skilled or intuition
I didn't.
Sadly me too
But after hearing this i think i can train for it even if i dont compete ill try atleast
š
explain
What country are you from
Morroco
Thatās where you live?
Okay then it wonāt be impossible to get into the IMO like for countries like India, USA, China
But it is still very difficult
Its too late man i just finished high school
wdym you would try then?
I think the way it's taught in school "advanced math" is seen as higher level math but in the context of math competitions it means something completely different (ie very complex problems & solutions) so going through a college curriculum won't help enough to make IMO problems "easy"
The only way to be chosen in my country is to be one of the 6th first in the country in national olympiad and then they can chose you but in orther to compete in naitional olympiad u need to be atleast in first or second year of high school
Math competition math is completely different from higher/advanced math
yes
Yeah same for us too
Actually idk what the min age here is though
Its 20 ig
I don't think we have one
Here its 16
what
didn't tao compete at 11?
hes from australia
oh I didn't know lmfao
are you in high school?
yeah
gonna try to compete up to usamo or imo?
just usamo lol I'm not good enough for imo
wbu?
Probably just usamo too but I can try š
maybe ill make it if I grind hard enough
what grade are u in
I really appreciated some recent videos by Timothy gowers going through some of the recent imo problems cold but using just natural problem solving ideas. I mean he is a former gold medalist and field medalist but those videos are actually really instructive on how you could in theory approach these problems. They did take him much longer like near 2 hours to solve a problem but I don't think he keeps up with any of these types of problems in his research and his approach again was using really natural approaches nothing fancy.
What I'm saying is I think a professional mathematician could solve these problems it would probably just take them longer. Research problems are way harder.
stupid combi
this is not at all related
problem 5 had few solves because it's an anti-problem and tricked many experienced contestants under time pressure
not because olympiad contestants are incapable of simple logical reasoning
this is not completely true
most top math olympiad contestants are bright enough to excel in pretty much any undergraduate math program
however the reverse statement is probably a lot less true
how to start adv maths
tbh i thought the number of solves for P3/P6 for recent years was higher than i thought but i've just looked at it and the # of solves for P6 was quite low for last year & the year before
i mean P3 last year just has more solves, but i haven't done this year P6 so i don't really wanna comment too much on the difficulty
btw that's not the right answer
Art of Problem Solving
Alcumus
Welcome to mathcord @signal rain
thanks! is it good?
yeah it has a lot of resources, but it lags sometimes i think
it is quite fun!
Hmm ok
Yeah because the skills that competition math teaches you are very useful and applicable to a lot of things
I think competitors are getting better is the reason why
Ooh I watched the video and now I really see why this problem is so hard
it makes more sense now š
yeah i think it's like bait because most people would directly think of a diagonal
Is it a good idea to do Uni Proof textbooks problems to practice for USAMTS? Like are they similar difficulty
I'm honoured
to be associated with math
as in ||that's not the right answer||
i know, i just watched the video
Hey I am really confused about consistency like I can't practiceaths daily so do you recommend any documents for the IMO
I have two years and I 'll be 19 and go to university so 2 years is the maximum timeline
Jensen + Titu
I did it with AM-GM + Titu only
I know what it is but I haven't studied Jensen's inequality yet
good job
what is titu?
what is titu?
Here's my solution by the way, I was pleasantly surprised by how smoothly it went (and how quickly I came up with it). I know nothing about LaTeX so this was a pain 
||PS: The second line is what LHS becomes after my subsitutions, I applied Titu's Lemma to it, forgot to type that in the code
||
which program do you use to type this?
I'm on mobile and there's this app called VerbTex which takes in LaTeX code and outputs a MS Word file (or other files, I picked MS Word) from that code
Yea it's pretty neat
Jensen + Titu seems shorter:
You can use the Mathpix service to convert handwritten math into latex pretty cleanly.
bro it took you only 10 minutes to do all of that and the expanding and stuff?
danggg
that's fast
what happened from step 2 to 3?
multiplied numerator and denominator by the same number
yep
nice
hi
for this problem I first noticed that whatever position you start with, if you consider the pivot colorless, then the number of points on each side of the line stays the same, then I figured that okay this line will certainly rotate a full 360 degrees, switching pivots during this rotation but in 'the lab frame', it will rotate 360 degrees.
Now each pivot will be 'responsible' for a certain fraction fo this full rotation, for example if you had 3 points placed as if they were vertices of a triangle, and the original position of the line was such that it goes through the triangle but only through one vertex (so it has one point on either side), that 'state' will stay the same, and as the process occurs, certain vertexes will 'own' certain parts of the 360 degree rotation.
(img 2)
So P1 might be the pivot for angles (measured from the -ve vertical) 30 to 150 then if we switch over to P2 it will cover some angle and so on, and none of these will overlap (if you draw a line for every point from P1 to PN on a number line that goes from 0 to 360 that represents how much of the number line it covers, these wont overlap (except for I guess when they switch the pivot from one point to another for like a really tiny instant, but we'll ignore that).
Now if there is no overlap that means that for every pivot there is a unique range of angles that only it can cover, given an initial state ( a points on one side of the line and b points on the other side). Okay. Now we have to prove that the windmill uses each point an infinite number of times. I guess if you prove that it hits every point at least once and eventually returns to the original point after hitting them at least once, then it will hit them infinitely (process will loop).
now just consider the fact that this line will rotate a full 360 degrees, so if you imagine it like a mop sweeper, it will cover the entire plane, of which S is a subset of. so isn't that enough to imply it will hit every point at least once?
like the only case where it will leave some area out would be if like it rotates and changes the pivot every time it is tangent to the vertices on the 'perimeter' of the polygon formed by the points (e.g. start with say a triangle and the initial position is such that it doesn't pass through the triangle, only touches one vertex, then it will rotate 'around' that triangle), but even then it touches every point, besides we have freedom over the initial condition so we can just make sure it goes through the outermost polygon formed by the vertices or something (this is handwaving ik, im just hoping someone will correct me here if they notice something)
if not, then why, but if the above is true:
Now I said that there is a unique range of angles corresponding to each pivot, which it 'owns'. So if we pause the process at some moment, and then translate the line so that it's pivot goes from P to P' (but the lines orientation is the same, since we are translating) then this new position will not obey our state invariant condition, so it will be invalid. This means that once we are done with the 360 degree rotation, and we arrive at 0 degrees. We must be at the same point that we were on the previous run, so we are again at that same instant and the process will loop infinitely so it hits every point infinitely
It's cyclic so I didn't have to expand them all, that made it a lot easier
Thanks, i'll try that
Nice solution. It's a middleschool math problem so I did not think about Jensen's. Also I only learned the special case of Jensen's when the weights are all equal to 1. Reading this solution opened my eyes to new approaches
do you have an explanation of this theorem? when i searched it up i only found the jensen's inequality for graphs i think
oh wait nvm it's just that the process of finding if a function is convex or concave takes a long time right?
Not really. You just take the second derivative and check whether it's positive (or negative) on the interval in question.
positive means that the set above the graph is convex
p3 from last year had 12 solves and p6 from this year had 8 solves
it's not that different
although fundamentally i would say they are difficult for different reasons, since p3 from last year had a lot of details/small steps while p6 from this year has one large central idea
the set above the graph?
but it's hard to actually compare the difficulty even though they are both combinatorics
yep
could you explain what that means?
The set of points on the coordinate plane lying above the graph of the function f(x). That is, the set of all points (x,y) such that y>=f(x).
ngl, this is a roundabout way of saying that any segment between two points on the function lies above it
i suppose it does show where the term "convex" comes from which is pretty neat
but for beginners it's probably not the best way to explain it
I think this is an easy way to memorize which is convex and which is concave. And the definition is ok, but actually we check if the function is convex by computing its second derivative which is not obviously connected to the definition with segments.
i'm kind of getting it now though
but how about for functions like x^3 where f''(x)=6x? is it convex for x>0 and concave for x<0?
exactly
how would it affect the inequality? is it just considered convex since the weights a_i>0?
convex or concave changes the sign of the inequality.
yeah, but i mean how would you use x^3 for that inequality?
you take f(x)=x^3, weights are 1/3, 1/3, 1/3. and points say x1, x2, x3>0. then we have 1/3*(f(x1)+f(x2)+f(x3))>=f((x1+x2+x3)/3), since f(x)=x^3 is convex for x>0. That is, (x1^3+x2^3+x3^3)/3>=((x1+x2+x3)/3)^3.
so the only restrictions are x1, x2, and x3 have to be greater than 0? and if x1, x2, x3<0 then 1/3*(f(x1)+f(x2)+f(x3))<=f((x1+x2+x3)/3) ?
yes
oh ok, i get it now, thanks
Here are some more problems that can be (more or less) quickly solved using Jensen's inequality.
wow, thanks for the resources. i'll try solving them
ooh I remember this problem, it was very fun
what is cyclic? š¤
basically symmetric for all variables i think
like xy+xz+yz=0 is cyclic but x+y^2+z^3=0 is not
Cyclic and symmetric are very different
ab+bc+cd+da is cyclic, ab+ac+bc+cd+bd+da is symmetric
ah I see
how do I solve the first one? using Jensen's and AM-GM I only simplified to $\begin{aligned} & \frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i} \leq \frac{1}{n}\left(\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{1+x_i}\right) \ & \frac{n}{1+\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i} \leq \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{1+x_i} \ & \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{1+x_i} \geq \frac{n}{1+\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i} \leq \frac{n}{1+\sqrt[n]{x_1 x_2 \cdots x_n}}\end{aligned}$
MarvinA
You need to choose an appropriate function. You see, there is a product there. And Jensen's inequality is about some sums. So, you should choose something that transforms products into sums or backwards. For example, you can prove AM-GM with Jensen: choose f(x)=ln(x), and weights 1/n,...1/n. Then
ln((x_1+...x_n)/n)>=(ln(x_1)+...+ln(x_n))/n
which is exactly AM_GM if you apply exp on both sides.
could you give me another clue? i tried $f(x) =\ln \left(\frac {1}{1+x} \right) but i got \ln \left (\frac {1}{1+\sqrt[n]{x_1x_2 \cdots x_n} \leq \sqrt[n]{\frac {1}{(1+x_1)(1+x_2) \cdots (1+x_n)$ and I don't know if I'm going in the right path
try ||f(t)=1/(1+e^t) with t_i=ln(x_i) and weights 1/n||
whoops uh idk how to fix this latex thing but thanks for the clue
oh, with that clue seems like i get the answer basically immediately, which is that ||the inequality was false||
but also, the x_i in [0,1] wasn't used for anything right?
nope, the inequality is always true for 0<=x_i<=1 š



