#competition-math
1 messages Ā· Page 31 of 1
ye
apparently its like a way of, acc I didnt understand any of the wiki page
"example: this can be applied to problem 6 of IMO.." yeah I will never need this
lmao
not like im getting into imo anytime soon
lol
i doubt usamo either
my goal is to get into USAMO and then I'll probably get a 0 š„
goodluck !
thank you šāāļø
woah
just realized u were talking about usamo
the geometry problems on there are hell
lmaoo that's my worst subject too
honestly I haven't given any of them an honest shot. I probably never will
right. i hate geometry too
whenever i see geometry problems on my olympiads i usually do those last
š
very reasonable
theyre lowkey fun
once it finally clicks !
but hell to understand
it depends on the problem for sure
I think when it's more than just "here's a bunch of shapes that share some vertices" they can be fun solves! the problem is usually, that's exactly what they are
truth..
I will say geometry when it involves other subjects are some of the most fun and unique problems Imo. i love the combinatorical problems and the ones involving probability (esp. with moving points or something)
right, but when its pure geometry its just tedious
š

agreed
i forgot about you guys
sorry
there are some who enjoy this sort of stuff
š
Me be wondering why ppl from the past didnt massacre mathematicians cos of the torture tat math gives u
they were probably burned at the stake

Archimedes lmao, some roman soldier killed him by accident
hypatia of alexandria
wasn't pythagoras' whole thing getting thrown into the ocean for suggesting sqrt(2) is irrational
no
am I thinking of someone else or did I just hallucinate that
I swear I've heard it somewhere
????
story is that some dude whom he rejected from his school
rebelled against his followers
and they burned his school
so he died
Hippasus
ohhhh I wasn't too far off lmao thank you
yeah lmao
apparently the pythagorreans were the ones who killed him
evariste galois
younge dude
killed at 20
i think in a duel
that's interesting
ye idk
math torture lmao
im pretty sure galois got involved in some politics stuff
cos i think it was the french revolution time?
idk
yeah that's what the wiki said
crazy actually at 20 solving a 350 year old problem and then becoming a revolutionary
these are the people my parents compare me to
he got expelled from school too cos he wrote an article abt his school not letting him become a revolutionary
and making him do school work
lmao
hey guys
hii
I think it's good that our current mathematicians don't seem as mentally insane as our old ones
ye lol
apparently alexandr khazanov another 20ish yr old dissappeared
at 22
yrs
ppl think suicide
acc wait, lets move tis conv to diff channel
tis is comp math channel
Galois died in 1832, several decades after the French revolution -- but French politics was quite unstable and violence-prone for pretty much the entire 1800s, or at least its first half. Galois himself managed to get arrested and jailed (as well as least expelled from his school) for political activism.
oh i see
but he died in a duel
or so the story is
Yeah, but the circumstances of exactly why (and even whom) he was dueling are rather murky.
Unrelated to yalls mathematician discussion lol, but I solved this problem and have a question abt it
my sol - ||assuming all angles are 160 -> then 2080 degrees total, but the sum of all angles in 13-gon should be 1980, so there is an excess of five sets of 20 degrees. Assuming this is compensated by the a 140 and b 120 degree angles, then we have a+2b=5.||
Thing is I kind of just ignore the entire part about the polygon being equilateral, is there a way to know for sure that the problem's unique equilateral polygon is in the set of poylgons I considered(those with angles 160, 140, 120)?
Thanks š
Hmm, we can imagine making the 13-gon by taking a regular 18-gon (with all internal angles 160) and deleting 5 sides -- but the sides we delete, viewed as vectors, should sum up to 0 so the polygon still its together after we delete the sides.
Hi
The only way to achieve that seems (much handvawing here!) to be deleting two parallel sides and then three other sides that make an equilateral triangle together.
Having one one of the internal angles be less than 120 would require deleting three or more sides in sequence from the original 18-gon, but that cannot happen if you delete a pair or parallel sides, and three sides that make an equilateral triangle.
I trust this source:
https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Galois/
I havenāt heard details about the person he was dueling being uncertain, but I havenāt looked into it so much
I based my remark off Wikipedia saying:
As to his opponent in the duel, Alexandre Dumas names Pescheux d'Herbinville,[15] who was actually one of the nineteen artillery officers whose acquittal was celebrated at the banquet that occasioned Galois's first arrest.[22] However, Dumas is alone in this assertion, and if he were correct it is unclear why d'Herbinville would have been involved. [...] [E]xtant newspaper clippings from only a few days after the duel give a description of his opponent (identified by the initials "L.D.") that appear to more accurately apply to one of Galois's Republican friends, most probably Ernest Duchatelet, who was imprisoned with Galois on the same charges.[23] Given the conflicting information available, the true identity of his killer may well be lost to history.
Instead of the handwaving, one could say something like: If we do delete three consecutive sides from the 18-gon, we have lost a total distance of 1+2cos(20°) in the direction of the middle deleted side. Since 1+2cos(20°) is more than 2, there'd be no way to make up for that by deleting just two more sides anywhere in the 18-gon.
I suspect that this was originally checked with a computer. If we ignore the equilateral part then there are only 7 different ordered 13-tuples giving 13-gon whose angles are multiples of 20:
[60, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
[80, 140, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
[100, 120, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
[100, 140, 140, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
[120, 120, 140, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
[120, 140, 140, 140, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
[140, 140, 140, 140, 140, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160, 160]
Further, It's not hard to search through all of the angles permutations to find that the only one equilateral 13-gon is this one (with exactly this ordering):
[120, 160, 160, 160, 160, 140, 140, 160, 160, 140, 160, 160, 160]
That's how it looks:
woa cool approach
i think that makes sense to me (?) will needa read it a few more times lol
O I see
Tyty yall
can someone explain this solution to me?
At the end, when it gets to the 39 part I don't understand
if one set of 2 circles is on the same side (makes sense), shouldn't the other be too?
otherwise if one was opposite sides and one was same side circles, wouldn't one of the smaller or larger circles have to overlap?
Why not just have both on opposite sides and make the answer 78?
doesn't that also work
I thought it should look like this but the ending part confused me
sorry, swap A and B and D and C
because B and D are supposed to be the larger ones
ohhhh
if one pair is on opposite sides then they have different radii comparitively to the pair that is same sided
but why cant both pairs just be same sided like in my drawing?
ohhh
congruent means that they are the same radius, I thought it meant same place and radius
that's why I was confused
I see
this an AMC 12?
why doesn't the bee just spin in a 12gon here
It gets bigger and bigger
Can u do it with arithmetic geometric series and complex numbers faster
because the distance increases each time
yes you can
yeah it was
ohhh I see
guys how prestigious is the american math olympiad
(as an international student)
Idk but don't do olympiads it's trash
How to do olympiads ?
š
lmao what
is the American math Olympiad different from usamo
true terence tao didnt get 42 points so IMO is trash
Tao himself says that olympiads are not real math
One should more focus on building strong theoritical skills rather than doing "tricks math" , during his highscool
There is plenty of mathematicians who have this view
Serre said that contests are good for enjoyment but real math is totally different
Do you not share my point
Ģ?
i donāt
itās good for developing problem solving skills and to say that it doesnāt teach you math is just dumb
no oneās saying to do elementary number theory when youāre in uni
itās high school math for a reason
do you think all of high school math is a waste of time?
I mean I don't think it's useless but I feel like a good highscool student have more to gain to dive into abstract stuff than doing what he already can do pretty well.
My point is that knowing that higher math is difficult to have good intuition on, a young mathematician should use his cerebral plasticity for that.
Problems solving skills are good but are not to prioritize over structural comprehension , imo.
Unless you 100% want to be an engineer
Of course not
i hate to state the obvious but you get better at math by solving problems and in particular, hard problems
thereās no reason to jump on the bandwagon and hate competition math just because itās a "competition" which is discouraging for people who didnāt get into it or did but didnāt perform as well as they wanted to
And that's my point I think those hard problems a highscooler should do is on analysis or abstract algebra
Or any uni math
i mean the kids i know who did well in comp math knew loads of analysis and abstract algebra in high school
I think to restrains themselves to basics things, no matter how hard we make them to them
Is not optimal
And barely a waste of time
some of the ideas are transferable too
Is getting better not the primary goal of these guys
maybe itās just a passion of theirs
not everyone does comp math for the sole purpose of awards
Sure but people do contests in order to get better at math too and I think if IMO was not considered as the most elitistic thing a lot of them would not even participate and would just do uni math because they would know it is what is optimal
i think thatās why youāre so bothered by it
Not particularly the awards but there is competition among friends and stuff
Wtf ?
you donāt think people like luke robitaille are brilliant?
I don't know him that's how I care about IMO so your try to make me look insecure is lowkey patethic lmao
ironic
Well I don't think I ever looked like I just wanna mess
In this conversation
you do come off as insecure when you speak like this lmao
like it just isnāt that deep
let people have fun
Well I never said it is that deep I was just having a casual conversation wtf ?
youāre sat here trying to undermine it as if itās "fake math" or reduce it to "just tricks"
Yeah and that's just my opinion seems like the one who cares too much about it is you
š¤£

ragebait
if not: I'm actually not really sure what your point is, because competition math might be indisputably the best thing a high schooler can do to prepare for higher math. it's fun, social, it draws parallels to problem solving techniques, and it helps you learn theory.
like if your take is "Olympiad don't help you much with higher math" ok maybe you can justify that. probably not. but you opened with "don't do Olympiads" as a blanket statement which is weird
lol genuinely

critical thinking and problem solving skills are just "tricks" nowadays
people are just insecure lmao
typical people who said that those problems have 0 applications in life so they're worthless
certainly some level of problem solving is important, competition math to some extent gives that and with harder concepts that are simply skipped over in school
Okay if 4 people told me that then I assume I made a mistake in my formulation, so excuse me for that.
I'm not a native english speaker so my language is probably very little idiomatic.
That said I will clarify my thoughts.
I indeed think that competition math is absolutely not the best way to get better at math, but I didn't say that olympiads don't help you much with higher math. My take is ensencially that one should not prepare himself too much to higher math, but rather do the actual higher math. I feel like your arguments in favor of contests are not exclusive to them, I mean I don't find any added value on olympiads compared to other ways of doing math. Problems solving skills and critical thinking can be developed in hard hitters books (spivak, rudin, lang, hartshorne), as for the social and funny part of it, I don't deny it, but my point is that if you wanna just get better at math, it is far more rewarding to dive into uni math than doing IMO exercises. And I even think that doing both is not optimal.
I'm not close minded and I don't understand why some people call me insecure ? About what ? I don't envy those prodigious kids wtf, I don't even like math I use it as a necessary tool for quantum information, so I definitely don't want to be at their place lmao
Can't we just learn those concepts on a random book, why competition math specifically ?
Well I mean pretty few books teach it. And if u were asking those questions even in a non-competition setting, here is still the appropriate channel
I feel like a decent amount of books teach it, and even if it's not the case I don't really get your point, even if there is only one book that teaches it, why not study it ?
No I mean competition math in general exposes u to problem solving and also interesting math at an approachable level
I would also add to that, that euclidian geometry is purely useless at a higher level, it's principally for a pedagogical purpose, and for the geometrical intuition yes but there is no need to master it to have one.
That's true
For the accessible part of it
I think it is actually a good argument
Why is Euclidean geometry useless
Well it is not a powerful tool for more complex problems
Differencial geometry or complex geometry are more adequate to them
Euclidean geometry is a pretty good tool for hard geometry problems
Since complex geometry is basically a dlc of euclidean geometry I don't see what is the actual value of using it rather than other geometries
there are still several open problems in Euclidean geometry
You're right but the tools used to try to solve them are from other geometries
Mainly algebraic, projective or complex
No researcher use only euclidean geometry concepts in order to solve problems of this field, but rather generalize the problem to more powerful geometries in order to use their tools for solving it
such as?
i'm sorry euclidean geo is like literally the least useful part of competitive maths
i mean almost all the euclidean geo problems i can think of off the top of my head are sort-of combinatorial in nature
and you study all of them using other methods, not like angle chasing etc.
euclidean geo (like proving XYZ is congruent to etc.) is pretty much dead as a research field
sure, if you like, itās more like ācombinatorial geometryā
Which parts are better?
i mean it's still very far from like actual research/uni maths, but at least with something like combi you are thinking about combi
or like with algebra or NT you often have to derive ad hoc bounds for ur arguments, which are useful skills to have
wdym?
as in like you often come up with like inequalities
or you get a feel for how fast certain functions grow
which can be kinda useful
i mean overall the useful part of competition maths that ur trying to extract for like uni/research will just be the problem solving skills and the resilience to try a problem for a very long time
but yeah as in like the actual content u need for euclidean geo just does not come up at all
Do u have an example? Just wondering
Sure
No wait what about constructions
and like constructibility
uhh not off the top of my head
but just like in general, knowing that this function grows faster
and like vaguely knowing how you could bound XYZ is a good skill to have
i mean that's all extremely well understood
also you don't use euclidean geo at all for that, u use galois
ppl got stuck on i.e. squaring the circle or trisecting the angle for too long bcus they were too focused on euclidean geo
when ppl finally brought in galois theory that solved a lot of these problems
I donāt see how that comes up
Ok true
this is reasonable, but still "don't do Olympiads" is not a good way to present yourself
ragebaiter:
does anyhone have any resources for late aime problems
real
like late alg geo and nt
i think ill prob just do mont for late nt
and egmo for geo
but what about late algebra?
it's a little disrespectful when you're telling someone directly not to do Olympiads imo
i dont get the hate on ollympiads
one can still do ollympiads and study higher math later...
Oh hey man
Toxic and misrepresentative of how math is actually done
Of course if you avoid both of these things then its fine
yes
you have to have a healthy relationship with ollympiads
The problem is that too many people dont
People thinking not getting gold for IMO or smth like that means they arent cut out for math
When in really higher math success is driven by hard work and determination more than it is intelligence
is that really so different from Olympiads though? if I took the AMC half a year ago, my score would be half of what it would be if I took it today
I'm asking this genuinely, because I'm not sure if progress keeps scaling like this
Sure but thats for different reasons than practicing higher math does
I suppose you could argue that both comp math and research math need memorization for improvement
But I would argue that comp math is more tunnel visioned in this way
any good books for math olympiads
if u are looking for one that has all the concepts(aime- mid usamo level), then u can try pathfinder for olympiad mathematics
is challenges and thrill of pre college mathematics good
yeah
if u are aiming for national olympiads, tis won't be enough
btw
you'd need to do several topics based books
like titu andreescu's number theory structures and problems
EGMO by evan chen
u can check out the aops olympiad books recommendation website
yea thanks
so is comp math
people grind all day for years
math is in general
no reason to exclude comp math just because its "toxic"
what makes you think academia isnt toxic
š¤
It definitely is
But the kind of toxic that comp math is causes people to have incredibly incorrect perspectives about math readiness or whatever
i agree that having an imo medal doesnt mean youll have such great success in math and that people shouldnt be so disturbed if they dont have that same success but i also dont think that means we should just try and undermine any form of competition math
I am really curious how strong the correlation is between competition scores and research abilities now lol
I don't suppose there are any papers on this?
they just end up being a quant
Assist lads
What must the determinant be?
Don't have an idea, but that the question
Only that info was given
Yes and I'm hinting you
If det A = 0 and det B = 0, what must det AB be?
Ohh sorry didnt notice
It gonna be zero
98% highest aggreagate yall!!!!!!!
Yep so now just replace B with A and you get det(A^2) = 0
So det(A^2) = 0 and det(A) = 0 implies det(A^3) = 0
Repeat until det(A^2013) = 0
Implies det(A^2013) = 0 right?
Yep
So basically i should just calculate det and equate to zero and solve for x ?
Yes!
That's what I wanted you to figure out
Shoutout bro, highly appreciate it
Please assist with these
Q4 could u let g_1(x)=sin(x), find g_1ā(x) then let g_2(x)= g_1(g_1(x)) and find g_2(x) continue this i assume there must be some sort of pattern or cyclical behaviour as sine is periodic
also if no pattern doing it like this will make the brute of it easier as u can just use the derivative of the last term when doing the chain rule
Yeah induction is super useful
But you don't need to formally prove it to problem solve
Hello guys, I am a 9th grader in India preparing for IOQM (for those who donāt know itās the first step of many to get selected to represent India in IMO) does anyone know any good channels to help me prepare from zero?
Disrespectful to who ?
Is this a prank of something
Sure there is probably a correlation but it's because prodigies are pushed by teachers to do contests
If one is a prodigy then he will succeed regardless of if he did comp math or not
Hey @abstract aspen can you help me out if you donāt mind?
So even if comp math is not the best efficient way to do math as a highscooler there will always be that illusion that it is.
I don't know much about olympiads I never really did
Oh, which country are you from?
France
Oh got it
from what i know india has a different curriculum compared to other countries
I just thought of how every undergrad who comes into the discussion share my opinion and how everyone who defend IMO and accuse me of ragebaiting are the highscholers who do IMO...
I feel like some people should be more open minded
Yeah IMO I mean comp math
mmm iād say competitions have their fair share of pros and cons
though based on my experience theyve helped alot
you do have a point
I donāt know about other countries syllabus but the most important topics I can tell you are algebra, geometry, number theory for ioqm
i see, it shouldnt be too hard honestly to brush up on those
So if you know some good materials or yt channels pls do share
here u go man
hmm for number theory i'd probably go watch prime newtons
Ig there are only PYQs in it but I need someone to explain concept pretty well
also michael penn, if you're able to understand notations
Which notations like example?
You mean sigma notes?
Sigma and Pi notes is a concept I am exploring rn
nice !
I have a book if you wanna know the topics you can check itās index
sure, if you'd like* to share
It is Pathfinder by Prashant Jain for Ioqm
sounds fun man, good luck !
I really donāt know how I will perform since the exam is in less than 2 months atp
hmm i see
And I really donāt understand the creativity to solve those problems
that is tough
Yk just randomly multiplying with a random variable in the middle of the solution to get the answer
hmm
Guys I am searching for someone to do group study on regular bases.
Topic - Differentiation.
Anyone down? Plz DM me..
Yea, do you know how to improve it?
what i do is solve olympiad questions from my countries papers
even if i am not able to solve them, i take a look at the solution
try to understand the reasoning behind the steps others have done
dont worry man, confidence builds over time
no worries, goodluck mate
Thanks mate, bye
does anyone know the formula for arithmetico geometric series like s(n) = a^n * (b+dn)?
You roll into a channel dedicated to a particular hobby and aggressively tell the people in it that their hobby is useless and they should be doing something else instead.
It beggars belief that you cannot see how that is ragebait.
You could be saying analogous thing in a channel for tennis players or stamp collectors (hmm, do stamps even still exist in 2025?) and get a similar reaction.
you don't like olympiad math?
It's probably one of the things in math I like the most doing it
you don't like math competitions then?
No I'm just saying that it is not suitable for optimal training and some psycho-rigid guys make me a lawsuit
okay
but it is very good to learn problem solving
Why does a hobby people have fun with need to be "suitable for optimal training"?
You seem to have a really bizarre set of requirements for which kind of fun you can abide people having.
idk, there will always be people looking for "optimal" method but usually the people who just go through things with a good procedure overall get more done
I think most of people would not do it that much if they would know that it rather hinders the progression
Are you trolling ?
You think most people would choose not to have fun with the thing they have fun with, just because you hate on it?
how does it hinder anything
you get worse at math from doing competition math?
That's what I said you're psycho-rigid, you're not even trying to understand me
Apparently spending any time on an activity Tenzr doesn't approve of "hinders" someone's time to do things Tenzr does approve of.
wait this explains a lot
hahaha
lolol
Why should people even care about whether you have something against the activity they choose to spend their free time on?
No but it will make your progress slower than if you just directly dived into higher math
You're making me say things I didn't ever say
So you have something against people doing anything that is not rigidly forcused on "progress" towards a goal that you approve of.
well yeah because you aren't studying higher math for competition math
You're the one who rolls into this channel and try to tell people they shoudn't be having the hobby the channel is about.
I'm genuinely interested to discuss about that to find what is true and I'm not close-minded.
On the other hand you just want to make people look like evil while nobody cares or at least should care
I swear you are the one who is agressive on the language
studying for competition math is more studying for problem solving abilities and maybe getting really good at like combinatorics and number theory for the higher math part
ye fr
you right about that one
And you are the one who is aggressive on substance when you swoop into a channel dedicated to a particular hobby and tell people they shouldn't be having that hobby.
but I think your premise is flawed
Telling people you disapprove of them having fun tends to make them push back. Whoda thought?
no
What?
I agree but I think some other ways are better for this purpose.
I made a more developed message a bit ago I will find the link
He is assuming that people do competition math to progress towards higher math, this is not the case. People participate in competition math probably more for the competition, problem solving, and general math ability.
Okay
All of that is still a really rotten excuse for telling people they shoudn't be having fun with the stuff that's fun for them.
That might be so, even for the skills like problem solving, but I don't believe there are any competition-based programs that help work on these abilities too as well developed as competition math is.
He never said that but ok
strawman or smth
That's his entire point!
Then it is probably a cultural thing in France and you were right about that, but out there everybody does it for the sake of competition
Yeah definitely a strawman of his point
I see, that makes more sense from your perspective then
don't do olympiads it's trash
Bad opening, he further explains his point later
I agree, that is a bad way to start though
"Don't do olympiads it's trash" was literally the guy's very first post in a channel dedicated to likers of competition math.
I mean I aleready explained the motivation of this one.
But I just don't understand all the hate, even if I was indeed a piece of shit then who cares just ignore me I really don't get it.
All of the subsequent posts have not presented a single good reason why you think people shoud "don't do olympiads" and the thing they choose to have fun with "is trash".
Because when you attack something people like, most people automatically feel offended personally and feel they need to defend it
Calling people's chosen way of fun "trash" is inherently a way to pick a fight withe them.
Then you misunderstood me because I think I was as clear as I could
90% of people are close minded and won't listen to you if you are immediately on the attack
There are not a lot of ways to understand "don't do olympiads it's trash".
Yes there are, for example:
"Why do you think that?"
And the explanation we got at lengths is that apperantly Tenzr considers any activity "trash" if it is not strictly focused on becoming better at higher math, or something.
That's anyways not what I wanted when I said that so all of your accusations fall appart
Yeah I see
What did you want when you rolled into a channel to call people's hobby "trash"?
Does "trash" somehow have a meaning in your language that is not an attack?
That is not correct. From his cultural perspective (I assume), competitive math's focus in France is mostly on reaching towards high level math. Now, this is not the case in most of the world I believe, and that's why there is a disconnect between your two perspectives. He sees it this way, rather you see it as just a hobby that you like to do and have fun with. That's why a point he thought was pretty reasonable makes you so angry.
He's French
Does "trash" mean something positive in French?
š
Does "trash" even mean something it's remotely okay to like in French?
I would definitely change the tone next time since people seems to not have the same philosophy of debate as me.
As I said it is my way of communicating, I'm more dialectical than diplomate so I usually don't really care about the form.
But even if they are way too psycho-rigid it's not my intention to hurt anybody so I guess I would make some efforts.
Calling people who disagree with you "psycho-rigid" does not really win you any points either.
Doing it in the same sentence as "it's not my intention to hurt anybody" evidences a certain chutzpah, though.
No I don't call people who disagree with me psycho-rigid I only call like that people who take it personally
Like you
There was some people who didn't btw
I'm not taking it personally, but I'm totally flabbergasted at how you don't see it enrages people when you call something they like "Trash".
And that's why you're psycho-rigid, being flabbergasted by this sound crazy to me, I'm a random guy on a random channel of a random discord server, take it easy man
Again with the insults.
Are you joking or something
Why would I be joking?
I didn't insult anybody the other guy is right about strawman
You've at least two time written "you're psycho-rigid"
I'm wasting my time good afternoon
And then you propose it's a joke to call out those insults?
holy shit this guy
if you dont like ollympiads dont do them
dont come to the ollympiad channel
and constantly talk shit about them
you're so annoying
like we get it
you're not making us stop doing ollympiads
well maybe because this channel is for competition math and he just said competitions are trash
i wouldn't assume anyone would be happy if i said that chess is trash in the chess channel
please do
I would ask you to not ping me if you want me to do not talk here
So who's ragebaiting now
ngl you showed up to "#competition-math" saying "don't do competition math" did you expect us to agree with you š
fr
<@&268886789983436800> pretty sure this is not the most appropriate nickname; they're trying to ragebait
Please keep channel on topic, thanks
can someone explain how the answer isn't 67
i basically did 2(2x+z) + 3y = 2009
so 2(g) + 3y = 2009 (g = 2x + z)
and uh now one solution is g = 1003, y = 1
now the standard step i subtracted the coefficients of y from 1003 and added coefficient of g to 1 until g>=1
which gave me 334 sols
same with the other equation which gave me 333 sols and adding both we get 667 = 67 mod 100
the answer is apparently 68 but i would appreciate if anyone can answer where i went wrong
18 and 20 are very easy for me, can anyone assist with the restšš¼šš¼
Sounds like you're only counting one solution for each value of g?
yeah
i couldnt figure out another way
i porbably undercounted
g=1003, y=1 alone is 501 different solutions for x and z.
i see any idea how to approach as to count all solutions?
would i multiply 501 * 334
to get number of solutions for g
No because g=4, y=667 is only one solution, namely x=1, z=2.
Not immediately sure what a smart way to count would be.
I wouldnāt trust GPT for either reasoning nor arithmetic here, but eighty-odd thousand sounds like the right ballpark.
(Namely about half of 501Ć334)
15.) sin(3x)/sinx = [sin(2x)cosx + cos(2x)sinx]/sinx
= [2sinxcos^2(x)]/sinx + cos(2x)
= 2cos^2(x) + cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)
= 4cos^2(x) - 1
given: cos(3x)/cosx = 1/3
[cos(2x)cosx - sin(2x)sinx]/cosx = 1/3
cos(2x) - [2sin^2(x)cosx]/cosx = 1/3
cos^2(x) - sin^2(x) - 2sin^2(x) = 1/3
4cos^2(x) - 3 = 1/3
4cos^2(x) = 10/3
sub into previous expression;
sin(3x)/sinx = 4cos^2(x) - 1 = 7/3
19.) defining s_n := x_n/(1 + x_1 + ... + x_n);
(x_n/s_n) + x_{n+1} = (x_{n+1}/s_{n+1})
(x_n/x_{n+1})/s_n + 1 = 1/s_{n+1}
s_{n+1} = x_{n+1}*s_n/(x_{n+1}*s_n + x_n)
we note x_n > 0 so s_{n+1} < s_n; therefore s_1 is the largest number in the sequence s_n
hence we maximise
x/(x+1), 0 <= x <= 1
= 1 - 1/(x+1)
maximum occurs when 1/(x+1) is smallest, at x = 1
1/(1+1) = 1/2
z = 1/2
hello,just curious but what exactly was your percentile?
Thank you so much, highly appreciate it
- Let X,Y~U(0,1) and suppose (wlog) max(X,Y)=X=c. Then, Y<X necessarily occurs with probability F_Y(c)=c. There are 2!=2 ways to arrange the max (either X or Y), so the density function of the maximum will be
f(c)=2*F_X(c)*f_x(c)(note that F_Y = F_X as they both follow the same distribution), soE[max]=integral(c=0 to 1 of c*2*c*1 =2c^2)=2/3.
General remark, the density function for the maximum of n observations from one continuous random variable, X, is always n*(F_X(x)^(n-1))*f_X(x) and can be easily shown by induction on the argument above
yo hello
Don't crosspost between several different channels. It's wasteful because people risk using time on typing answers that have already been posted elsewhere.
a solid 30
itās in 4 months
any tips to prepare
all I want is AIME qualification
for AMC 10/12? I'd say that's probably the bulk of it
i was in the same boat about 6 months ago (maybe ~10 higher) and now I think I'd get a 110-120. I would start by going through the tests on aops and solving them under time pressure.
you probably shouldn't need to learn many theorems but if you look at a solution on aops and it uses a strategy you don't understand I would try to click thru any of the hyperlinks to see what you're missing
tldr just do practice tests
cc @true grotto
actually 10 correct was probably higher than what I wouldve gotten so u got this
not aops books?
do you have any idea of by which grade the average student qualifies for AIME?
if they do
not sure how much they help but they're definitely not required
still, you should probably ask someone who's actually read them
I was wondering this too actually
I don't think there's data on it. pretty much all we have is the score distribution and none of it is aggregated by grade
yeah that's completely fair
you definitely will learn as you just do the problems. they're quite similar, generally
lmao I have the book in front of me rn
for 10 it's alg 2
going into precalc next year but I know ~all of the content I need for AIME
generally you should know the trig functions, logarithms and some basic properties, and product/sum notation ( represented by sigma and capital pi)
you too š
Iāll just try them once by buying maybe one
thatās true, kind of unfortunate, if they did I would have an idea of the competition there is
oh shii, which one?
do you guys think a person could finish all aops intro books in 4 monthsā¦
alg intro, but i alr know evrything in it, so im jst doing it for fun
YES!!
no wayā¦
im done with a little more than half of the first one and i started like june 20ish
intro to alg
its the bigst one
nah the intermediate algebra one is
but tats not the intrio books
thatās like 25 days ago, but I have 4 months until AMC10
yea true
yes grind
ill do it with u
im tryna finish bfore school starts
I'm curious would u say the book has helped you?
nope
atleast not the intro books
but if u want like acc comp stuff then do the aops comop math series
ive finished the last one, rlly helpful
yeah I've heard they're like AMC 8 level, would u agree with that
ye
i took amc8 last yr
im going 9th rn
what'd u get
higher than I ever got lmfao
5th q
i was one point away from DHR š
dhr was that high??
lol
23
but i guessed last question and got it right smhow
right
i mean 17 aint tat bad
yeah but I mean I would probably be doing a lot better rn if I started taking comp math seriously in middle school
ye, i wish i had started off more seriously in like 6th and 7th grade
r u gonna take amc 10 or 12??
next yr
do they still offer it online?
if so you might want to ask around and find a school offering it
if you have a lot of time yes
maybe 2 hours p/day everyday
dont do just theory for amc10
you should focus on doing lots of problems
and if you realize you're getting questions of the same theory wrong a lot
then learn that theory
you need to do WAY more problems than you need to learn theory
learned this the hard way after wasting half a year and honestly learning nothing for actual problems
well, that is if amc10 is similar to the brazilian math ollympiad
yeah nevermind amc10 is multiple choice
but still, solving problems is number 1 priority
idts
mine doesn't either, check local colleges
I emailed MAA asking for locations and they gave me a list of local ones. there's also a website that shows local spots but it's been down (they said it'll be back up in some weeks)
ah was it just a covid thing then
I remember doing it online my junior and senior years (feb 2021 and nov 2021)
oh I see!!
im prob gonna ask one of the other hs in my area who do offer it, or go to a private org
like aops or think acadermy or smth
we were supposed to but the proctor wasn't able to get it running so we just did it on paper loll
if amc was online then cheating š
There's already massive cheating in for example, Mainland China so...
Paper does disincentivise cheating
But if students are so fixated on cheating out of desperation (a lot of Asian unis give preferential admission to Olympiad winners) then it's hard
Can someone draw a quick diagram or explain this because I'm unsure how this is possible
?
thoughts?
yea problem solving helps a lot
To reinforce concepts
for sure
and if there are small gaps in knowledge
they get filled through lots of problems
no clue how helpful this is, but it may be worth trying to write a_n explicitly (which seems very doable) and then some kind of induction argument from there on a_(2n)*b_(n+3). It is likely helpful to note that the numerator of the b_(n+2) recursive step can be factored via sum of cubes
can u even do 12 as a freshman
I mean regardless you should do 10
yes, you can always test up for amc
ik i did
I assume it's not really worth your time?
its good practice ig
unless you wanna do usamo instead of jmo ig
but you can't do both 10 and 12 right?
hmm okay I was unaware
as they are tested at the same time
and you get fully registered for both so you can qualify further?
that's cool if so
yep! so if the cutoffs for aime are more friendly for the 12a instead of the 10b, you can qualify thru the 12a
cool!! that actually helps a lot lol AIME should be a lock if I do that
thank you šāāļø
this reeks of some fibbonanci stuff, just try to shove fibbonanci into it and pray it works
yeah a_n is just k^(nth fibonnaci number) i think
Yes. I could not solve k=1 case without a_n anyway.
But the $b_n$ are weird. If we write $c_n=k^{F_{2n}}b_{n+3}$ (which is what we're supposed to prove is an integer) and translate the recurrence for $b_n$, I get
$$c_n = (k^{F_{2n}-3F_{2n-2}+F_{2n-4}}) \frac{c_{n-1}^3 + k^{3F_{2n-2}}}{c_{n-2}}$$
where the initial factor of $k^{F_{2n}-3F_{2n-2}+F_{2n-4}}$ is always $1$ and drops away.
Troposphere
Interesting. Looks like the right move. It still reduces to b_n in the k=1 case. I suspect that case is not too difficult but my number theory is poor so I could not do it.
If we're lucky, each c is just an integer polynomial in k. The degree of c_n would end up being 3F(2n+2), meaning that the k^3F(2n-2) gets added in the middle of the terms of c_{n-1}^3 ... which doesn't really seem to bode well for this approach.
Actually, since only a_2n matters, the important thing here is probably really the recurrence for even Fibonacci numbers: d(n) = 3d(n-1) - d(n-2), and d(0)=0, d(1)=1.
Starting with hand-computed facts
c_0 = k³+1
c_1 = (k³+1)³+1 = k^9 + 3k^6 + 3k^3 + 2
we then have, assuming it is true that c_n is always an integer polynomial in k:
- the degree of c_n is 3d(n+1)
- the leading coefficient of c_n is always 1
- the constant term of c_n is 2^d(n)
(still not sure if this leads anywhere, though)
Does anyone have any resources for late aime problems
Like the number theory theory for late aime
bruh I know where you get this from
yea you must think about using the google lens to find its origin
aye smth like that āļø
What does \sum_{eye} mean, anyway?
Ah.
what is this š
zawg
nah they forgot a negative sign
can someone help me with question where it is like minimise something given that the variables satisfy some other equation
eg
But this one idk
This ones easy I did it with trig y=Rsin(m), x=Rcos(m)
,w factor x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz
Use that ^
wth
Umm maybe look into AM GM HM inequality
Cauchy schwarz
and also try random algebra manipulation stuff if needed to get it to work
yeah you prob need AM-GM for this
i know AM gm where AM> GM but how does that help can u like run through the problem for me
šļø
oh thatās interesting
Yeah and then itās typical AM GM like you said
Big hint: ||u=x+y+z, v=x^2+y^2+z^2||
hello
do you guys know if they release the scores for mathcounts if u didnt make states
These questions keep going in circles #competition-math message
#bruhmoment
lol
Hey guys!
welcome
Heyy, I'm in grade 10, and my math teacher signed me up for a math contest against our province, and I was wondering what do y'all think I should review ?
mm depends on where you're from
if you can i'd look for past papers on that contest
but if you can't i'd focus on number theory
also brush up on geometry theorems + combinatorics
nothing, who cares
like it sounds this is your first time, just see how you do with no preparation
i went to state comp with no preparation, not in math though
it's still good to study
i think if you want to see how well you do just use a past paper and time yourself
combination and Newton's binominal sum seems quite easy but geometry seems little hard
anyway
I need an expert to explain about this intricate integeal
ya just mock past tests prob
hola
aw hell nawww
<@&268886789983436800> random things???
This doesn't look like competition math
this sh* scared me
you should follow @orchid linden 's advice and go to a help forum
okay
wait whered you go to get access to this channel
dont see it in the roles
cause im wondering if theres linear algebra lol
p sure you just need the undergrad role
use power of point S to prove āSAP and āSPB are similar
then it's just angle-chasing to prove angle KCM = LCM
you dont actually need the role btw
can just add the channel
are you smurfing in the math discord
no one here is gonna help you bro šš
people do help actually
with a calculus problem in the channel for competitions which pretty much never require calculus?
nah i think they genuinely want to know cause they sent it into the multi var channel afterward lmbo
or maybe just smurfing idk
keep maintaining on main topic pls
I'm asking in wrong channel and don't wanna break the topic you guys know, it's quite embarassing for me.
my bad bro
š
I dont think it gets much easier
in terms of comp math
like wdym
i heard amc 10 is pretty easy if your ahead of the curve
oh nvm i was reading it wrong
yeah i did its lowkey light
<@&268886789983436800> here too
how long did it guys take you to go from scoring low on amc 10 to qualifiying for AIME?
(assuming you haven't been doing comp math for a while)
Need a lil advice:
I mainly do aime problems
Sometimes I like to try olymouf problems
But sometimes, even after looking at the solution, all I can do is say WTF
Idk why phone make its all caps
But like, I wonāt be able to think of a single step in the solution
U gotta learn concepts first and (very importantly) understand why they work the way they do
Conceptualizing problems is probably the most important thing here
i know the stuff ig
but its just like
the manipulation
this is an example fro mtdy: N7 (RUS) Let P(x) = anxn + anā1xnā1 + Ā· Ā· Ā· + a0, where a0, . . . , an are integers,
an > 0, n ā„ 2. Prove that there exists a positive integer m such that P(m!) is a
composite number
my friend asked me this problem from imo shortlist
and the only tool i could think of was using b-a | P(b) - P(a), and I was trying to get some contradiction by assume all P(m!) were prime
but the solution involved a lot of what felt like random manipulation
O dam go you š
what math are you taking right now
i finished alg 1 and geo in school math
im reading aops intro books rn
before starting comp math i took an amc 10 and got 49,5
once you take alg 2 at least for my school you get a lot of insight on number theory and a lot of sub topics ig if you can put it that way
im assuming ur like
9th or 10th grade
rising freshman
prolly try to qual aime before u do amc 12
mhm
at least geo is still fresh in ur brain
but uh
u might need to self study alot of alg 2 topics
like all the functions
radical, rational , quadratic, polynomial yk stuff like that
but one thing is
im just curious bc idk - how does that help (genuinely asking)
wdym
im not very experienced but i heard comp math is very diff from school math
amc 10?
its not that different
my school did not give me anything to work with for comp math
i was thinkin ab studying alg 2 anyways so i could skip precalc
my school has never had an aime qual
O lmbo
bro what
broo what
IM SERIOUS
Wel I can see it a little
so if i study hard and learn a lil alg 2 yall think its possible?
yeah practice practice
dont lie btw
Like the last maybe 3 questions on the sat math portion are comparable to like question 7 on the amc10
yeah module two like last problem or so
lol
i should reconsider
Well like
trust i will qual 'jmo 10th a
practice a ton
fr
me personally i do usabo
why are u tryna skip pre calc
š i need that luck too
yygs calling my name
all the prestigious math summer programs (PROMYS, and a few others) have ppl finishing high school math in 10th
i wanna get in
so hopefully i take calc bc in 10th
yeah sumacs out of the question for me
someone i met doing some harvard class got into sumac by "listing some medals"
lowkey just erase me now
im trying so hard not to compare myself to others
lowkey same
ur one year younger than me
insane work
i was not try harding freshman year
i realize i be putting my selfworth on my accomplishments - but there will always be someone better
so atp im just in a trap
š„
well if it helps im a rising junior and have yet to qualify aime
š„ 94.5
WE all qualifying AIME this november
fr
we are scoring 130
bc ive always wanted to do cs but that got oversaturated
then ai but also got oversaturated
and now quant which is cooked also š
i only care ab college bc im scared i wont get a job
me neither
dang u should def start learning alg 2 and beyond
someone check me on this
isnt there precalc on amc 10
there is but prob not necessary
nah technically idt so
i think amc10 is only supposed to include up to 10th grade math
but knowing above helps a lot
i heard that with enough higher education (calc+) u can brute force half problems
hm
like area questions
i learned everything through aops so freshman year I just jumped from math 2 -> calc ab
in my school you needa take AB before BC
š
what is math 2?
oh
ur school sucks
idk
i skipped it so idc
fr
private or public
me too
linear alegbra š
lol
i thought you wanted a job 
^
every single job (yes, every one) thats STEM related is at risk of AI
i might as well choose the job tha pays the most and interests me before ai fires me
CS majors getting cooked
fr
i used to wanna go into cs
realistically
worst case scenario i js get phd in math and then become an actuary
how is that the worst scenario
yo mark cuban told me actually the job market is not cooked
I feel like quant has to be cooked
š
moreso than everything else
more than cs?
I mean math specifically
the only thing more cooked than cs is art history major or gender studies major
not software engineering jobs
at LEAST quant isnt oversaturated. sure its hard asf to get into but they still need ppl. unlike cs, where theres too many applicants
bro, he said that everyone is overreacting abt AI and that many STEM jobs ( literally only doctors) won't be fried
anyone here doing HVTSp
if u look up "mechanical engineering job market" youll find a reddit post saying it sucks
iirc
id air on the side of taking the part about "overreacting" with a grain of salt
if you look up jobs for physics or math majors, some of the top results are usually engineering jobs
._.
š
cause AI progress is probably a lot faster than a lot of people think
if there existed a button in front of you that would destroy genAI forever would you guys press it
engineering is the safest major ( am i cooking)
no
people just dont talk about it because slowdown -> less profit
and no
I think AI progress will slow such that each of us will have at least a chance of entering the job market, but it's still a big threat
