#competition-math
1 messages · Page 28 of 1
@dapper magnet
Posted
Does anyone know a good resource for learning projective geometry?(Book, website, video)
What's a nice fact about Telescoping series and products?
Yeah, im asking stupid stuff but I wanna know if anyone is knowledgeable about telescoping
cuz its super fun :DDD
where
@sleek ivy
#latex-help
yea m8 that aint helping you just put it in the exact same format
HahalolXD
maybe start by finding f(x), it looks like a very simple integral
Yeah
CONTINUE then
you don't need to differentiate the inverse function
why not
plus FTC
tells us we can compute the derivative of f^-1 directly from what we have already
like, if the radius of the second circle is x^2 = (10sqrt2 - 5)^2 what happens
don't get it
what is (x+5)^2 + (y+5)^2, geometrically?
the minimum distance between (x,y) and (-5,-5) after the power of two
oh, you edited it
that's correct
what happens
that is the answer
idk, i don't get it
why do they give the first circle
no i totally get it now, it was simple
is best to think about the second expression as the power of 2 of a distance of (x,y) and (-5,-5)
that
my English sucks
also, if we find the minimum distance between (5,5) and (-5,-5) and we subtract the radius of the first circle we get 10sqrt2-5, which is the minimum distance between (-5,-5) and the first circle, then if we think as the second expression as the minimum distance squared between (x,y) and (-5,-5), we would need to square 10sqrt2-5 to get the smallest value of the second expression
they give the first circle because the minimum distance from (x,y) to (-5,-5) cannot be 0 because then (x,y)=(-5,-5), we need (x,y) to lie in the first circle , so basically it's asking for the minimum distance from a point on this circle to (-5,-5)
anyways, simple but cool problem bro
huh
i got pi/8 + 512/pi^3
Set $y = f^{-1}(x)$, then $x = f(y) = \int_0^y \frac{t^3}{t^4+1} , \mathrm{d}t$
impract1cal
If $y$ is invertible, then $\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} = \frac{1}{\frac{\mathrm{d}x}{\mathrm{d}y}}$
impract1cal
A fairly straightforward computation shows that y is invertible
now, $\frac{\mathrm{d}x}{\mathrm{d}y} = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}y} \int_0^y \frac{t^3}{t^4+1} , \mathrm{d}t$
impract1cal
which is just $\frac{y^3}{y^4 + 1}$
impract1cal
nah his answer was right
Can I get the hardest Problem to solve yet
why?
u probably aren’t at that level
How could you say ??
Explain that
One sec
Yeah go on
r u sure
don't complain now
Ok. Prove or disprove: Do there exist real numbers $a_0, a_1, …, a_{2018}$ with $a_0 \neq 0$ such that the roots of the polynomial $P(x) = x^{2019} + a_{2018} x^{2018} + … + a_1 x + a 0$ are $a_0, a_1, …, a{2018}$?
oh hn not number theory
hockeydude85
I get your point
But I would try Solution Tommorow
Making an Availability for it
I got your Solution
Texit is Doing it I mean its converting it
man you guys should take a look on this kid
<@&268886789983436800> very off topic
@rare bluff please don't post off-topic images like these in math channels
Wait the image is a 9 years old kid that solve integral
what "off-topic" images r you guys talking about?
nah bro there doesnt exist any numbers a0.......a2018 such that they are the roots of that polynomial
the product of its root is always equal to the the term with x^o divided by the coefficient of first term
here if we multiply all the roots that should be equal to a0
now if a0 x a1 x ....... x a2018 = a0 here this is only possible when a0 =0
but in the eqn it is given that a0 is notequal to 0
hence there doesnt exist any roots such a0......a2018
why can't you have something like 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1, etc that multiply to 1?
then a0 * 1 = a0
but they all are distinct
sure, if you want distinct then let's do 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5. ... etc. and then the final one can be the one that makes the product 1
then it will equal to 1 not 1/2
we want it to be equal to 1
no you take a0 1/2 thats why it should be equal to 1\2
try it with just a0 and a1, and see what happens
??
(x-a0)(x-a1) = x^2 + a1x + a0
Where is this problem from? The answer is ||no|| since ||there doesn’t exist a real polynomial with degree 5 or higher that satisfies the property that the coefficients are it’s roots||. You can have a look at the first answer of the following link: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2689332/monic-polynomials-whose-roots-are-their-remaining-coefficients, which finds polynomials that work for degree 4 or less (note that there exists only one 4th degree polynomial that works which is nontrivial). As mentioned in the answer of this link, for the proof of the uniqueness of this 4th degree polynomial and the || non-existence of any polynomial with degree 5 or more ||, head over to this link: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2315341?origin=crossref, which should proof these things. However though you will need to log in through your institution there, which is why I cannot access the article
Its from the CMC mock USAMO
this is their proof (he asked for something hard)
trivial inequality 😭
what?
From which year?
Okay, it’s very surprising because I understand the entirety of the proof, but thought that the solution would be actually harder than this. Indeed every step that they did is correct, and it’s a very nice proof. It’s just that I would’ve not thought about doing all these steps and using inequalities along the way, because it seems like it needs a lot of time. But again, wonderful proof, and if you are unsure about any part of the proof, I am happy to help
lmao imagine this situation
i thought i was gonna have till friday to study for a stupid competition
starting today
turns out the test is tomorrow
im dying
yeah u completely bs'ed this no offence
does anyone have an olympiad math formula sheet /notes. I'm sitting an open book exam soon and the only thing that I really needs is circle geo ( like circumradius =abc/4A) notes and inequality notes
ANYONE PREPARING FOR IMO
NO
RECOMMEND NOT MESSAGING IN ALL CAPS
IT MAKES YOU SOUND LIKE YOU’RE SHOUTING WHEN YOU DON’T NEED TO BE
why are u asking these questions? U didn’t solve my question
sorry i will not do such things from now on
i didn't understand it
can you elaborate it a little bit
Ok I’m not trying to be mean I don’t rlly understand the solution either
Hi!
How do I deal with Telescoping Equations?
Because I think its just the same as Telescoping Series
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BwL9ye4_4E&t=1256s
Referring here atm
Mastering AMC 8 book: https://www.omegalearn.org/mastering-amc8
The book covers the most important concepts on the AMC 8 contest, and includes video lectures for every chapter, formulas for every topic, and hundreds of examples and practice problems with detailed video solutions.
Mastering AMC 10/12 book: https://www.omegalearn.org/mastering-am...
The solution you provided just before?
🤨
Can you give a example for a telescoping equations?
sum r = 1 to n 1/r - 1/(r+1)
Not telescopic sum but telescoping equations he is talkin about
if you actually read what they were asking about you'd see that they're two different names for the same thing
👍 😂
I will say post your exact question for help!
i've never heard anyone call them "telescoping equations" but "telescoping" in the context of computational contests can only really refer to one class of series problems
where almost everything cancels
How are you @pallid tundra ? long time no see
I see
the most common lazy way to do it is partial fraction decompositions like the classic 1/n(n+1)=1/n-1/(n+1)
endless pain and suffering 
Is there any other effective way to do that?
pfd is an extremely standard technique though for some reason US schools usually delay actually teaching it until calc2
basically it's common denominators in reverse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fraction_decomposition#Procedure see the "illustration" for an example
In algebra, the partial fraction decomposition or partial fraction expansion of a rational fraction (that is, a fraction such that the numerator and the denominator are both polynomials) is an operation that consists of expressing the fraction as a sum of a polynomial (possibly zero) and one or several fractions with a simpler denominator.
The i...
how does this help us do telescoping sums? if the factors in the numerator are all linear polynomials then potentially you can get lots of cancellations to happen
yeah I see
But I am asking that, Is there any other effective method to do telescopic sum as you say it's a common lazy way?
partial fractions is the most common method i've seen
but there are other ways to make telescoping sums
lemme find another example
In mathematics, a telescoping series is a series whose general term
t
n
{\displaystyle t_{n}}
is of the form
t
…
op the Wikipedia page has a few good ones
it also mentions the fundamental theorem of calculus as an extension of that telescoping idea
Are you asking how to invent a problem where there’s a sum that telescopes?
No no I am asking him for some different approach as he says pfd is a common lazy method.
Huh. Perhaps he's saying that if the problem author is lazy and want a sum that turns out to telescope, partial fractions are a common principle?
yea that's what i was getting at
I see
from imc 2024
are you asking for advice on how to do it?
||partial summation 1log1 + 2log2 + ... + nlogn||
thanks
guys try this
😭 (for pfp)
bro u def didnt think u were the only one with that pfp
lol
i love luffy so i search in google luffy and its give me this in the first one
How do I express the denominator?
My idea was something like n(n+1)/2 + 1.... idk why I had my intuition set to that
Update on this, nevermind
Had to take a break for a while and realized its (n+1)(n+2)/k
you could also add +1 and -1 in the numerator and sperate it intro two terms
option D
yeah i did also like that
every term will cancel out and we left with 6\210
which is 1\35
can you elaborate a little bit
correct!
nope, the correct one is 1/7
it is 3/5 * 5/7 * 7/9 * ... * 19/21=3/21=1/7
so, it is (c)
You need to be bit careful when reading the problem. That would’ve been right if the numerator and denominator each fraction were increased by one number from one fraction to the next, in which you can cancel like that, but the numerator and denominator keep increasing by TWO numbers each time you move on to the next fraction. For example, numerator in first fraction is 1+2+3 and the numerator in the second fraction is 1+2+3+4+5 (an additional 4+5, not 4). Same thing applies to the denominators. Use algebra to find that each fraction can be simplified to n/(n+2), only then you can cancel across and simplify
sorry i messed up
how do i qual to aime?
all good
top 2.5% in amc10 or top 5% in amc12
that is around 100 in amc10 and 90 in amc12
How to do this? I’m stuck
That didn’t work
Nope
Because either of those trivialize the problem
Then youre cooked
Go learn mass points
Its quite easy once you get the hang of it tbh
I don’t know if that helps or not
well first do you know how to find [DFC]?
Use ratios
do it rq
32/3?
well the denominators right but not the numerator
how'd you get it
WAIIITI
wait
nvm
How'd you get that
This
I think I see what's happening there but I think it would only work if you had a diagram like this
Let me show you how you would find the area
Given that BH is the height of ABC and BCD what is the area of ABC and BCD in terms of h
Yeah
you know this?
Have u figured out the answer?
ye
What is it
well here's my work I do believe it's correct
So far I get is the total area is 200/3
But the answer is 40/3 though.
I made a small mistake
Bro are u sure that will works?💀
But see if you know what's happening here
Well [CDF]=8
But the area is not 8
You use 20/12= [AFB]/[ADF]
The length is 8
The problem is structured so that it is
You get [CDF] = (DC/AD) * [ADF]
That general two
When two triangles share that same height
The ratio of their areas = ratio of their bases
The reason why your method doesn't work is because ADF and CDF don't have the same height as CBA
does that make sense or should I show you why
American maths competition is crazy geez
Why u use 20/12
Not smth like 8/20
Could u show me how to do that using mass points ?
I want to see multiple solutions for a question
Let us call a random triangle ABC for example. Draw a line segment from B onto any point on AC and let this new point be called point D. Let us say that this divides AC into a ratio of AD:DC = x:y. Then what is the ratio of areas ABD and CBD?
Do u mind if I ask u to show me a full solution? It’s like 0am now my brain aren’t working, I will probably understand ur move in the morning
Okay
If you need a hint for the question I asked, let me know
I think you should just following adin
He'll probably walk you through it better than I can
Okay
9;4?
Don’t use the numbers or the original problem. I created a sub problem just so that you can understand the idea behind what we’re doing.
Oh.
Also this is correct
X^2:y^2
Ik im just trying to understand
Not really
Yes, that’s good
No
I’ll give a hint. So we know that the area of any triangle is it’s base * it’s perpendicular height. Draw the perpendicular from B onto AC and let’s call this meet point E. What’s the perpendicular height of triangle ABD and CBD from AD and CD respectively same as?
You do applied maths?
Is that in high school or a uni thing?
I skipped 3 grades so that I can take applied maths💀
At grade 12
My school offers that
Ah, I don’t really know the system in Canada, but skipping 3 grades is bit risky lol. But then that means that you’re capable of taking applied maths
Yeah exactly.
May I ask what are the other type of maths that they offer there?
I didn’t do a lot of competition stuffs
Essential, applied and calculus
Oh, I did some competitions, so I have an idea on how to solve these problems most of the time
What’s the difference between taking applied and taking calculus? Sorry if I’m acting stupid
You get to take group theory at the end of high school?
Applied is like for solving real life problems
Ohhh ok
Nonnonono
I will failed
I hate that thing
Group theory sounds interesting, but I thought it’s only usually offered in uni though
I will faint if I see that
Yeah but a uni teacher came to my school
And she starts teaching that
That’s really lucky. For us we have to wait until uni to start group theory
MY SCHOOL PAID MORE THEN THE UNI PAID HER
That is all OUR MONEY NOT SCHOOLS
50k-70k per year bruh
It’s honestly unfair. No wonder why they moved. Why have I heard a lot of the time that unis are underpaying their teachers/professors (that’s actually really scary cause I plan to be one)
Who pinged me
Wow that’s a lot
Ahh okay. Wait, is your school private?
Yeah.
Ok makes sense now
I’d take calculus and applied maths and physics at the same time
They connect to each other
It’s like ok for me
Hmmm. And btw how do you find applied math? I’m just wondering
No pressure on that
Combination of calculus, physics and some competition maths
Probs a lot of pressure
Mainly similar to physics
Wait what. All of those things are in applied math? That’s interesting
Yeah weird stuffs
I don’t even know I can use calculus in physics
Since when is competition math part of the school curriculum? Id wish it were the same over here
And applied maths too
Yeah
Mandatory.
I’ve not really even seen calculus in physics yet. I’m waiting to though
Only Canadian competition thou
That’s lucky. Competition math should be mandatory everywhere (jk)
I’ve seen some Canadian math comps, they look good to me
If u are in the highest level class then it’s mandatory
Oh ok
I can show u some
Maybe in dms. That would be great
Uh did you try the hint from the below message from the one that I’m replying to?
Idk
Did you first draw the triangle and the points?
So you drew triangle ABC, points D and E on AC and drew AD and AE given the definitions I gave previously? Now what do you notice about the perpendicular height of the triangles?
okay I’m going to bring up this diagram for a new reference. What is the height of triangle ACB and DCB here?
Did any one here participated in the IMO or passed it?
If there is please how was your study schedule Iean is there any daily recommended amount of time to do it
14 hours a day on weekdays, 16 hours on weekends and 21 hours on holidays
Hahaha that's super funny
yes pls share what study materials should we follow
NOT AN IMO PARTICIPANT
Usually, what you want to do, is to just stop asking questions, and start grinding.
Books for competition math, starting the IMO journey, is to start with really awesome books like AoPs and MathDash!
These materials help you prepare for like AMCs, USAMO, AIME, etc. Internationally, this would also imply to other math competitions.
IMO GRINDSS
Read loads of textbooks, solve imo problems, learn how to prove, and uhh learn super advanced topics that a typical hardcore math professor would be
okay, TL;DR Just start grinding
can you send pdf of books??
thank you so much
CL to E2 are your skill levels
CL being the classroom level -- standard highschool curriculum math
A1 - E2 being the starting competition maths to IMO level
Should I take notes when reading comp books or do I grind problems and those are the notes
Preparing for the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is a significant and rewarding challenge that requires deep understanding, problem-solving skills, and consistent practice. Below is a detailed study plan, broken down by phases, topics, and weekly routines, adaptable over 6-18 months, depending on your current level.
🔍 Phase 1: Foundation Building (Months 1–3)
🎯 Goals:
Solidify core mathematical concepts.
Develop mathematical thinking and proof-writing skills.
📚 Topics:
Algebra: Equations, inequalities, polynomials, functional equations.
Number Theory: Divisibility, congruences, modular arithmetic, primes.
Geometry: Euclidean geometry, similarity, circles, angle chasing.
Combinatorics: Basic counting, Pigeonhole Principle, inclusion-exclusion.
🗓 Weekly Routine (10–15 hours/week):
Day Task
Mon Topic Lecture (e.g., Algebra) + 2 Easy Problems
Tue Solve 3 Problems from previous topic
Wed Topic Lecture (e.g., Number Theory) + 2 Easy Problems
Thu Solve 3 Problems + Review solutions
Fri Rest or light reading (e.g., problem-solving strategies)
Sat Mock test (3 problems) + Discussion of solutions
Sun Review week’s work + Fill knowledge gaps
🚀 Phase 2: Intermediate Problem Solving (Months 4–8)
🎯 Goals:
Begin solving intermediate-level olympiad problems.
Refine techniques and learn multiple approaches to problems.
📚 Topics:
Deepen understanding in all four main areas:
Algebra: Inequalities (AM-GM, Cauchy), symmetric polynomials.
Number Theory: Diophantine equations, Euler’s theorem, orders.
Geometry: Inversion, transformations, angle bisectors, Miquel Point.
Combinatorics: Graph theory basics, invariants, recursion.
🗓 Weekly Routine (15–20 hours/week):
Day Task
Mon Topic Study (1–2 hours) + 2 Problems
Tue Problem-Solving Session (2 hours, timed)
Wed Topic Study (1–2 hours) + 2 Problems
Thu Mock test (2 problems) + Self-review
is this chatgpt
Fr reads like it but i didnt wanna say in case it might offend them
The emojis are overkill
Especially the first sentence
i dont ever see myself saying that line
99.99% confirmed!
there is a competition math site for coding ?
A website dedicated to the fascinating world of mathematics and programming
These aren't great for competitive math, but certainly are for competitive programming
there is math here ?
Where?
in codeforce?
Of course, a lot of math
Competitive programming has a lot of math
so why is not good
Because competitive programming involves programming, algorithms and computer science, things that doesn't appear in competitive math
yea i want comp prog
There indeed is math in competitive programming, but if you want to study for math olympiads, competitive programming aren't the best resources
This discord server ain't really focused in competitive programming, there are certainly more focused servers
can you send me?
Don't know any at all, but with some searches you can find some certainly
For the problem "How many triples of three-digit palindromes have a sum that is also a three-digit palindromes?" would you use PIE to account for overcounting?
how would you even overcount
anyone planning for imo?
did u make imo?
or are u likely to make it?
u mean the international math Olympiad?
yeah
^
if not this is getting ridiculous. (Of course) I haven’t made it but there are way too many questions about this then
6 people get selected from each country
If two palindromes are the same you could have P, P, Q, P, Q, P, or Q, P P
should I say unordered to clarify that
I can but I'd like to know if PIE is applicable
Partially because I made the problem and I don't want a messy and fallible solution
I study maths in french 😭, I am really struggling with materials mentioned by you
I have a question
Is mathtraining website good
I mean I started learning and I was able to solve a national level problem on angles and triangles
It also teached me how to think like do first of all angles chasing than start to break down the problem
mathraining is a good website, I have seen its questions and theory, I personally think it is a good website, but it is your choice. ("mathraining est un bon site web, j'ai vu ses questions et sa théorie, je pense personnellement que c'est un bon site Web, mais c'est votre choix." in french if you understand french more.)
Hope this helped you!
Answer:
I need help to understand why ∠EBM = ∠FDB. I haven't read the entire solution yet, just read the beginning to try to discover the other informations. But I don't understand why ∠EBM=∠FDB
It is a standard property of the angle between a tangent and a chord to the point of tangency.
It is called alternate segment theorem
https://thirdspacelearning.com/gcse-maths/geometry-and-measure/alternate-segment/
Dang it
I didn't about this theorem, thanks a lot
Why is MA = MD? As it said in the end
MD is a median in the right triangle ADC
cana nyone help me with 2021 putnam B1 ||
I drew this and got x(theta) = (1 + cos theta - sin theta)/(2 cos theta)
Then integrated the square of that expression by 0 to pi/4 and finished by multiplying by 8/pi but im getting the wrong answer, it seems that instead they just integrate the square of
(1 + cos theta - sin theta)/2
Why am i missing random cos theta factor?||
theres an amc problem that looks like ts
it was like last year right?
there was another one
don’t remember it
The diagram looks similar, but the problem it accompanied is completely diffetent ...
yea i know
why bother with comp maths then
comp maths is meant for training your brain
- you're in the wrong channel
- you should show what you tried if you want other people to help
- follow the instructions in:
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
what’s the method to prep for amc 12
Hello, is study around 3 hours maths per day, is it enough to be good in competitive mathatics
Mathematics*
imagine 2 squares side to side, now draw a random line which has to go through the 2 squares, now, what is the probability of the ratio between the areas of one of the squares split in 2 by the line, to be the same as the other?
I came up with this problem myself.
So if this is terrible you know why.
FFJM and three days ago I decided to start a journey hoping to qualify to the national Olympiad that makes me qualify to the IMO, I am from Tunisia by the way
This happens only is the line is horizontal or passes exactly through the midpoint of the side the two squares share.
You don't say which probability distribution you're choosing your "random" line with, but if it's a reasonable, continuous distribution, the probability of "horizontal" and "passes through the midpoint" will both be 0.
Depends a lot on a lot of things: how long have u been studying, how much time u have, how do u study..... But it isn't really possible to say if 3h are going to be enough. Focus more on studying correctly, if u really like math, eventually u will want to study more and need to study more.
show me how to integrate non elementary integrals my goat
Which
college is uni
pre means before
so the answer was yes
What
😂
who's gonna know
you're pre ?
pre birth
Don't know how to start
To start with, even n are impossible, because the sum of all the numbers is 0 (mod n), but for even n, the sum of the specified column sums is n/2 (mod n).
can someone help me w this problem
ik its a d=rt problem but i cannot figure out how to interpret anything
I think ||all odd n ought to be possible||, though.
I don't really understand why, even though the total sum is 0 mod n, the sum of the numbers inside a line aren't necessarily 0 mod n, right? What did I miss
it's possible to arrange the numbers to make mod for both row's and columns 0, but arranging for Distinct seems not possible
like for n=5,
I tried with n = 4 and indeed it seems to be impossible, but i dont understand the relation between the sum of numers inside a line and the total sum
The row sums are all required to be different, so they are exactly all the residue classes mod n. For odd n they all cancel out against their negatives, but for even n, n/2 is its own negative so doesn't cancel.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
5, 1, 2, 3, 4
4, 5, 1, 2, 3
3, 4, 5, 1, 2
2, 3, 4, 5, 1
this arrangement will give all mods as 0
Sorry, i don't understand
The row and column sums are all equal there. They were required to be different modulo n.
What do you mean they cancel out
a + (-a) = 0
exactly, it is possible to make the sum equal, but impossible to make it unequal
Right, but the numbers inside the board are all from 1 to n, so how is it possible to be a negative number
I have a family of solution with distinct row/column sums.
would like it if you could share it
It's negatives in modular arithmetics where multiples of n don't matter.
So if n=15, for example -6 = 9.
For example, for n=7: ||```
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
6 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 3 4 5 6 7 1
4 4 5 6 7 1 2
3 5 6 7 1 2 3
2 6 7 1 2 3 4
1 7 1 2 3 4 5
Or, perhaps nicer looking: ||```
6 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 4 4 5 6 7 1
3 4 2 6 7 1 2
4 5 6 7 1 2 3
5 6 7 1 5 3 4
6 7 1 2 3 3 5
7 1 2 3 4 5 1
You can either write down a lot of equations with a lot of unknowns, or cut it down to a simpler fact: going 80 miles at the initial speed is 1 hour quicker than going the same 80 miles at the reduced speed.
Then there's just one unknown to solve for.
I'll have to do a check later on
@near hill in the second case is the accident occurrence considered exactly after 1 hour? (Sorry, English isn't my first language)
I understand it as: in the second case the speeds are the same, but the accident happens whenever the train reached 80 miles past the point where it broke down in the first scenario. Those 80 miles do not necessarily take an hour to drive.
got it
So if the track looks like
Aytown ----------- C -----80mi----- D ------- Beetown
and the accident happens either at C or D, the train spends:
Either one hour A-C then 30 minutes stopped, then C-D at reduced speed, then D-B at reduced speed.
Or one hour A-C, then C-D at full speed, then 30 minutes stopped, then D-B at reduced speed.
The one hour, 30 minutes, and D-B segment are the same in both cases, so the only thing that makes a difference for the arrival time is whether the 80 miles from C to D were run on full or reduced speed.
you are very good at explaining
Thank you.
(if my mental arithmetic is right, the train's full speed is ||20 mi/h||, which sounds pretty pitiful even by 1955 standards...)
i have the first case as 2 + (d/r) = (r/r) + 0.5 + (d-r)/[(4/5)r] and second case as 1 + (d/r) = (d + 80)/r + 0.5 + (d-r-80)/[(4/5)r] according to ur logic above
Sure. Now if you subtract those equations from each other, many of the terms disappear.
In the second equation, I think you mean (r + 80)/r rather than (d + 80)/r.
thats frickin awesome
planning to do any amc?
i need to prep for amc 12 but feel so overwhelmed
idk where to start
have been learning number theory for a few days
I got 20mph tysm
Why is my train moving at negative mach 17
imagine a cube of cubes made up of 1000x1000x1000 cubes, and you are on top of it right in the middle, now shoot a beam right below, it will go through 1000 cubes to reach the bottom, now, if you hold the beam at an angle with respect to the initial position, it will go through more cubes, now, find a general equation on how many cubes the beam will go through, and how that amount changes as you change the angle on x and z axis.
it will go through 4000 cubes cuz in middle means you be standing and shooting in the middle of 2x2 square
try to imagine yourself standing at top in the middle of a 2x2x2 cube
i will rotate it so the plane projected above it, the middle will line up with- you know what, who cares, there are 1000 cubes anyway, not 2, it's close enough.
i mean on each axis
1000x1000x1000
And no don't make the engineering joke
i think you've to think more along the lines of the edges of the cubes than the cubes themselves
since if it hits within one cube it is guaranteed to hit all cubes in the diagonal
hollup lemme make an illustration
don't forgot about the other axis.
you not only have to account for x but also z.
i was just thinking, you can rewrite it as, imagine a 1x1x1 cube, with a laser being shot from the above, vertically inside the cube. If the sum of reflections it made from above and below face = 1001, the box breaks. If the sum of reflections it made from any side face and its opposite side face = 501, the box breaks. How many reflections would it make before the box breaks?
Also find an equation for how many reflections will it make before the box breaks when shot at an angle.
same logic for the z-axis, but idk how to proceed with the fact i just explained
it it's 2 other cubes you didn't draw
i don't think a reflection mechanism is mentioned.
i mean both questions are equivalent, not same but the answer to both questions is same
? i think those are sufficient to show my point, no?
i thought about this problem myself randomly idk if it's somewhere else but it sounds like a math comp question.
But i am WAY too dumb to solve it myself.
idk what u mean by this btw
what if we try to find how many faces it will intersect? is that possible? if so we can convert it to how many cubes.
i'm pretty sure the question you've formulated is wrong in the sense it should be 1001*1001*1001
since there is no "middle" in the current case
you get better by solving problems, simple 😂
jkjkjk, anyway, i would recommend solving riddles, puzzles, you could find some here in ted ed https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJicmE8fK0EiFRt1Hm5a_7SJFaikIFW30&feature=shared
you can also learn concepts from
https://brilliant.org/
these help improve your imagination
that said, the number of possibilities are (1001)^2. Idk how you can derive an equation in theta and xyz for the current problem since even for different values of theta or x,y,z you can have the same case happening.
Are you by any chance Indie?
I am preparing for GATE, and doing some courses
I see
Are you by any chance tamil?(If no nvm)
why the skull?
Can't detect anyone's level lol
maybe mathematical level
i am not tamil !! 😂 curious why you thought that tho
Obviously your name lol
my name is of bengali origin
I see
so, are you tamil?
you asked about JEE so...
I see
I know someone with this name preping for JEE in my batch
that's why I asked
GL then
Thank you!
Have a good night!(actually I wanna say day but it isn't sadly)
you too^^
What the hell with your banner? lmao
I have a bad mind lol
oh lmaoo
sorry if it is not something I thought
its not any hentai dw
💀
You've cracked it?
shii was traumatic
that was?
wrote this year?
lastt
had 6k in adv
lmao idk cause I am not here in those days
fr, GREAT!
nahh
i shat
after mains
don't do tht
Had .66 in mains
Could've gotten better
But slacked
likee
how do o say
many people after mains
Go chill
I ws one of it
don't do that
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyygggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooodddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Sure!(I always hold words of my seniors)
wbu now?
Hello everyone I am from Tunisia and most of my time I ama struggling because I study from random websites I don't't even have a single maths book that has problems within for competitive maths, I usually find problems on random websites and try to solve them
This is a one
Let a and b be distinct natural numbers. Show that there exist infinitely many natural numbers s such that a + s and b + s are relatively prime.
Can someone rate the difficulty of this problem
I hope also my English sounds good cause most of it I learned through listening to streamers
Or reading novels
Anyone please rate the difficulty of this problem
How are you going to prove this goofy thing?
Nah but going to
something called JEE
ye
Like waht
The books?
I mean the titles of books
Or the resources
I really lack them a lot
It can't be bought anywhere sorry
even if it is I can't right now
'cause they are my Institutional books
I understand
There are no exams I just wanna reach level of competitors in maths so I can be at the same level, I wanna by anyway improve my life and escape from my country there is nothing good here and it is very hard to find a teacher
They really ask for huge amounts of money so they teach you for 4 or 8 sessions
The only exam I am taking is kinda of mix of games of maths and logic
I see
What is your math level or grade?
Because Tunisia is francophone country
I am at the second year of secondary education
But you know
What abt your school teachers?
Hhhh there only 4 maths teachers
I told you they offer very expensive private lessons
I see
And at school is usually get full marks or 90s without even putting some effort
Is it that ez for you?
Is there anyone here that did the IMO by anychance
Not that much but kinda of
because our country selection test will be the by the begining of 2026 it will be such a great achievement to do well without a teacher that guides me
Wish you all the best in JES
JEE*
Thank you so much!
why you giving them permission on behalf of someone else lmao
This is exactly what got you into trouble yesterday 
I don't get any trouble lmao
what is it?
When you pinged tropo
I ain't
Or shubham did idr
This isn't trouble at all lmao
I am iron man lmao
I like that opencry
I feel sorry to myself for that reaction
That is not competition math though
are you doing limits?
I see you came back to dc 
i am not sure if this can be counted as a proof
but we can say that there are infinitely many primes so infinitely many numbers of this form
is that correct ???
I think it's easy
just take s=p-a, where p is any prime greater than max(b-a, a) (in case b>a)
Tha ks
I want a daily schedule recommendation
Like is 2/3 hours daily goos
good*
it doesnt really depend on the time as long as your problem solving improves
initially 2-3 hours is quite good
Ok
Hello guys
I have this problem i’ve trynna solve
I know the answer and it’s quite obvious as we are driven by intuition to find the answer the question remains how to prove it without supposing elements in the sets
Here’s the problem i’d like you to gimee sum hints i haven’t gave up yet
Don’t use complex concepts tho
What exactly is N* there?
Non zero postive integers
Well if you want answer i can say it
How about ||A=3N+1, B=3N+2, C=3N||?
Exactly
The question remains how to prove it
And it doesn't just want one solution, but all solutions.
The one I showed isn't the only one; at least we can swap A and B.
Swap A and C , B is stable
Otherwise you don’t have the a+c thing
No -- C is distinguished by being the numbers you can add to an a or b and not get out of A or B, respectively.
Yeah exactly
That’s the only two solutions btw
||(A,B,C)={(3N + 1,3N+2,3N*),(3N+2,3N+1,3N*)}||
Do you have any hints on how can i proceed to make a clean proof?
When you say
prove it without supposing elements in the sets
do you mean we can't start by saying "let c0 be the smallest element in C", for example?
Oh no no it’s okay
I meant like we can’t say
Suppose 1 in A
I would say something like:
Let c0 be the smallest element in C.
Then 1, 2, 3, ..., c0-1 must be divided between A and B. And because we can add c0 to anything from A or B without leaving that set, this settles the fate for any number that is not a multiple of c0.
Assume without loss of generality that 1 is in A.
Then clearly the smallest number that can be in B is c0-1; otherwise the two smallest numbers in A and B would add up to something smaller than c0.
But that means (once we have excluded c0=1 or c0=2, which is easy) that c0-2 is in A, so (c0-2)+(c0-1) = 2c0-3 must be in C.
We've already seen the only numbers that can be in C are multiples of c0, so that means 3 must be a multiple of c0, which means c0=3.
And every multiple of 3 must be in C, because they can all be made as 1+(2+3+3+....+3).
Thanks man i’ll use this smallest number thing
broo i already sent u my perfect guide. every imo participant has followed it. hear it is again good sir
Preparing for the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is a significant and rewarding challenge that requires deep understanding, problem-solving skills, and consistent practice. Below is a detailed study plan, broken down by phases, topics, and weekly routines, adaptable over 6-18 months, depending on your current level.
🔍 Phase 1: Foundation Building (Months 1–3)
🎯 Goals:
Solidify core mathematical concepts.
Develop mathematical thinking and proof-writing skills.
📚 Topics:
Algebra: Equations, inequalities, polynomials, functional equations.
Number Theory: Divisibility, congruences, modular arithmetic, primes.
Geometry: Euclidean geometry, similarity, circles, angle chasing.
Combinatorics: Basic counting, Pigeonhole Principle, inclusion-exclusion.
🗓 Weekly Routine (10–15 hours/week):
Day Task
Mon Topic Lecture (e.g., Algebra) + 2 Easy Problems
Tue Solve 3 Problems from previous topic
Wed Topic Lecture (e.g., Number Theory) + 2 Easy Problems
Thu Solve 3 Problems + Review solutions
Fri Rest or light reading (e.g., problem-solving strategies)
Sat Mock test (3 problems) + Discussion of solutions
Sun Review week’s work + Fill knowledge gaps
🚀 Phase 2: Intermediate Problem Solving (Months 4–8)
🎯 Goals:
Begin solving intermediate-level olympiad problems.
Refine techniques and learn multiple approaches to problems.
📚 Topics:
Deepen understanding in all four main areas:
Algebra: Inequalities (AM-GM, Cauchy), symmetric polynomials.
Number Theory: Diophantine equations, Euler’s theorem, orders.
Geometry: Inversion, transformations, angle bisectors, Miquel Point.
Combinatorics: Graph theory basics, invariants, recursion.
🗓 Weekly Routine (15–20 hours/week):
Day Task
Mon Topic Study (1–2 hours) + 2 Problems
Tue Problem-Solving Session (2 hours, timed)
Wed Topic Study (1–2 hours) + 2 Problems
yeah this is nice cause b cant be a multiple of a + s = p by the setup
like actual limits or just random computational rules?
what is this chatgpt ahh guide
highkey
you cannot do a routine for math
yeah. thats the point ||it is chatgpt (obv)||
what do you mean by that. how we supposed to then
Could you not?
Fr
Chatgpt just assumes peak excellence from everyone and gives you a guide that no one can follow.
limits! anyways wdym by random computational rules?
Like this is the same for competitive programming
If you are trying to do a routine it wont work
Because you often fall behind with problrms that have bugs
where can i find problems
Can i use induction ?
That would be the natural choice for several of the subproofs here, yes.
Okay thanks
i mean for comp math
Probably this is the biggest collection of competitive math problems you can find https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c13_contest_collections
The olympiads from your country must have some sites either, where you can find past problems with solutions
anyone free?
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
yes i am send question
Just talk what you want, sis!
cause these kind of questions are not liked by this server lmao
@pure yarrow You may look at schoolhouse of KA but it for precalculus
anyway check it out!
i needed to interview someone, but it's settled now
Hello, tomorrow I have a make-up exam for the entire math course. It includes Real Nouns, Fractions, Proportionality, Scales, Statistics and Probability, Algebraic Language, Grade 1 Equations, Tales, and Pythagoras. Could someone help me with this? Regards.
Interview? lmao
practice on Khan Academy
the relevant sections will be in Algebra 1 and Geometry
oh wait a lot of is Prealgebra as well
South, How many hours are you active on discord?
Like how many hours got you very active role
I have no idea
but you'll get *very active soon I bet
lol
undergrad but not maths
You studying math yourself?
You're just helping with your knowledge of math you have lol 
What is your major, if you don't mind?
sociology!
there's no contradiction lol
okay the story is I was doing a maths degree but switched out
there you go
What a sad story in my pov!
,, \prod_{k=2}^{\infty} \left(1- \frac{1}{k^2} \right)=\frac 12 ?
Monkey•D•Luffy
do you need very active role?
not badly If I can, I wanna
suggest me, come on!
boboblakis
toni
@soft vigil
Howdya got emeritus?
just talked
i didnt even need to get active or very active for it
yes
why
the math to sociology pipeline gotta be rare
Didn't enjoy having to grind STEM
DONE should i send solution??
Hello?
is there a channel dedicated to putnam
i think the prerequisite is olympiad
r u on it
I want to let you know that sending a solution to a question to others is against this server's policy.Also I am asking that is that infinite product correct!But it is fine now(Thank yor for your consideration ❤️)
Yes
bro i was just asking if i should send the sol or not
okay i never did prepare for olympiad i want to solve real analysis of putnam
I see.I appreciate your consideration! But I have understood it already!
you can set this equal to something, log it, then write the argument of the log as one quotient, apply log rule, factorise, apply log rule again, and i think it will telescope
A good start would be to find the measure of the visible angles not involving the short line between square and nonagon.
Also hint: draw this line. Notice anything in particular about the long thin triangle?
samuel
Is it 85
NAHHHHH you're a genius or I'm just dumb how did you make it that easy
oftentimes geo problems are solved by drawing something extra
Yeah but it was just one line away
Nah you did
I drew a shit ton of lines and then realised all the lines are equal
Which means equal angles
Where is J
so what if show that the altitude intersecting withTI
be the point
J'
and show that J'D is parallel to FI
and then you are done
Hi?
can you clarify the solution?
The two triangles on each side of the red line are ||both iscosceles||.
ah
why though? how do we know for sure?
All chords that span 3 corners of the nonagon have the same length, and all sides of the square have the same length too.
oh duh
Hi chat!
How do you guys learn stuff intuitively by not like applying theorem, rules, etc and random stuff?
how do you ask a non vacuous question?
without throwing around buzzwords that show you don’t know what you’re talking about?
“intuitive” “concept” “rigorous”
when you’re reading a math text don’t do so passively
have pencil and paper to write stuff down and work the examples and end-of-chapter problems
ask yourself “why is this true” for anything that doesn’t seem immediately obvious
it’s a slow process but rewarding
that is how you deeply build your understanding of a topic
re intuition:
having good examples to fall back on is especially important once you get into more advanced topics if you want to hone your intuition
hey guys quick question is it correct that there are 90 four digit palindromes?
Sounds right, if you don't allow leading zeroes.
Then the first two digits can be anything from 10 to 99, and those two digits then determine the last two digits.
k ty 🙏
yep that's what I did
One message removed from a suspended account.
no anwer?
Is it bernoulli number?
nope, it's Beta function
The numerator and denominator are just integrals of x^p (1-x)^n and x^n(1-x)^p over [0,1] (which is a definition of beta-function)
You may not even know about beta-function. Just change variables t=1-x in one of them to see that they are equal
wdym by changing variables?
change of variables in integral
yep, but in fact, you don't need this to find k.
I need some help on my mathematical conjecture
might be too specific but anyone know about the amc?
iykyk it's coming up soon
australian math competition
I know I'm like 2 days late, but to be sure, you can prove that TI is perpendicular to AD, implying that J is the orthocenter of triangle ATD.
Indeed, I found that either, but now I have to prove that TI is tangent to (AMN). Any idea?
I have a solution that works, but it's kinda.. weird.
Let (I) touch BC at a point, AD intersect (ABC) at another point
Those 2 points and F are actually collinear.
We can use that fact to find the angle TID more easily
help pls ;-;
Forget for a moment that the area of ABCDEF is supposed to be 1 and just concentrate on finding the ratio between the side lengths of the two hexagon.
(For this purpose it may help to pick a different scale such that the side length of the green hexagon is 1).
bro i got
√3/3
and then some horribly complicated number that i dont want to type
but √3/3 isnt correct
Exactly what is √3/3 supposed to be? The ratio I suggested you start by finding?
no the answer
That's not the answer I get either.
ope
aaaaaa
hold on lemme try the ratio thing
i got √3/3 before i asked this
ok first of all the side length of the big abcdef is √(2√3/9) right
sqrt{2sqrt{3}/9}
a
how dy type latex in this
Just surround it by dollar signs.
no stop
You still need to type the same backslashes as you would in actual LaTeX.
Anyway, it looks like you don't like my suggestion -- which is your right -- so I'll just wish you good luck.
wait i wanna use ur suggestion
tryna f ind the smaller hexagon's side length
i got the larger one but idk if its right
My suggestion was to set the side length of the smaller hexagon to 1.
$\frac{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3}}{9}$
Indeed. And that means that the ratio between the areas of the two hexagons is ...
samuel
1/3 then?
Yes.






😆