#competition-math
1 messages · Page 26 of 1
kangaroo 2024
oh really
it's what gamba said
it's easier than what you seem to imply
well ok, there's maybe a trick with 8
I know. I wanted to give a way of how to go about solving similar problems
that 8 makes it easy here, but its not reliable to depend on such stuff everytime
what do you mean 8 makes it easy
i meant that you can't tell that 13 is what's under 8, maybe 8 is upside down in pic 2, but it doesn't cause problems because we can also tell that the "wrong number" is 34, so 13 is right
8 clearly shows 34 and 13 are opposite faces, and similarly shows 22 and 5 are opposite to eachother
coz the 8 is oriented like that
If there were some symmetrical figures, it would make this tougher
Imagine the faces were painted instead of printed
in that case you gotta rely on information of adjacency
that's not an 8 thing, it's like you're correctly saying the numbers make it easy but you call it "8 makes it easy"
yea, mb. Its not an 8 thing
the same applies to 22 and the rest
I got baited into thinking that by this /j
yeah a trick in the opposite direction, 8 is almost a painted side
math kang is like a logic comp ngl
yo does anyone want to work on some problems together?
I'd like to try
Where are these problems from?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Ohh mb
<@&268886789983436800>
yeah true
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
???
well we know that it's 13 on the left dice because we can see from the rightmost dice, and for the middle one it's 22 on the table from the left dice. we know that for the right dice, it's a 8 on the table. hence it's 43 (i think?)
Why mods being pinged everywhere what's going onnnnn even i had to report something recently
we ping mods when there's some particularly egregious shit going on
like someone posting obvious scam links
in which case mods immediately swoop in and ban the offending user once we ping them
I have been seeing way too many of those recently
Every channel
well yea the scammers spam their links in every channel they can get to
it never fools anyone
lmao
What
Mega Angelo13
Looks like a geometric sequence
0 - 1: 1
1 - 4: 3
4 - 8: 4
8 - 16: 8
...
wait
Is this
$2^{n-1}$
Shawn
where the first index starts from 0 and so forth to 0,1,2,3,4,...
And that's the thing! Does a formula for the series 0, 1, 4, 8, 16, ... exist or not? With every natural number being possible?
$(n-1)^2-(n-2)^2 \cdot \frac{1+(-1)^n}{8}$
Civil Service Pigeon
,w (n-1)^2-(n-2)^2 \cdot \frac{1+(-1)^n}{8}, n=1
,w (n-1)^2-(n-2)^2 \cdot \frac{1+(-1)^n}{8}, n=2
,w (n-1)^2-(n-2)^2 \cdot \frac{1+(-1)^n}{8}, n=3
,w (n-1)^2-(n-2)^2 \cdot \frac{1+(-1)^n}{8}, n=4
,w (n-1)^2-(n-2)^2 \cdot \frac{1+(-1)^n}{8}, n=5
Oh my god
That's incredible
Civil Service Pigeon solved my question! Not only did he found a formula, he also found a different then mine! Congratulations!
Um, @ivory ember can I use your formula in my personal math book?
All imma say is “check out oeis”
Yeah I found it out 3mins ago from a different server...
T(n) = 2^(n-1) - max(0, 2-ceil(n/2))
T(1) = 2^(1-1) - max(0, 2-ceil(1/2))
= 2⁰ - max(0, 2-ceil(0.5))
= 1 - max(0, 2-1)
= 1 - max(0, 1)
= 1 - 1
= 0
T(2) = 2^(2-1) - max(0, 2-ceil(2/2))
= 2¹ - max(0, 2-ceil(1))
= 2 - max(0, 2-1)
= 2 - max(0, 1)
= 2 - 1
= 1
T(3) = 2^(3-1) - max(0, 2-ceil(3/2))
= 2² - max(0, 2-ceil(1.5))
= 4 - max(0, 2-2)
= 4 - max(0, 0)
= 4 - 0
= 0
what formula?
No no I misunderstood
6th degree polynomial can obviously fit this but that's essentially trivial
i mean $2^n - {1}_{n \leq 1}$ lol
LY
i mean u can always find a formula for whatever sequence you want lol by doing smth dumb
So you can really find a formula for the series 3, 7, 1, 9, 6, 283, or what?
Ok how tf
bro doesnt know the secrets of the sums
I do but it's crazy to see it
e.g. 8, 19, 18
the difference is 11 and −1
the difference of that is −12
divide −12 by 2, means it starts with −6x²
that would start as 0, −6 so −6x²+17x
makes 0, 11, 10
−6x²+17x+8 is the formula
4 numbers would have an extra step with cube term etc.
i used this calculator https://polynomialregression.drque.net/online.php for yours
Reposted: #prealg-and-algebra message
is it just 19 + 18 + ... + 1?
then -1
ah no im getting something wrong
oh it's 18+18+17+16+...+1
so yeah it is 19+18+...+1 -1
this is because it starts with 1-18, then 20-37, then 40-56, ...
which is 18 + 18 + 17 + ...
thats why its -1 because there is no 0
is there a mu alpha theta discussion?
hi guys,
I want to participate in purple comet contest and I want to make a team. Is there anyone interested?
Do you still need?
No, unfortunately, my classmate gathered a team
np, good luck
How to prove?
fill up the bottom layer with height 1 unit and you'll quickly see that you need 4 blocks that are standing vertically, with heights 4 units
alright, so using this method, you can definitely pack 36 bricks into a 6x6x4 box
then repeat the same process, repeating the bottom layer twice, but now there will be a hole you cannot fill
if you're clever, you can realise that 53 bricks is 1 short and so trying to put a 1x1x4 hole in the brick is impossible without creating a 1x1x2 piece
Make a checker board pattern where each color fills the 2x2x2 box. Now every piece will hit the same number of black and white cells. WLOG there are 8 more white cells. So after 52 pieces there are only 8 white cells left, therefore we can't place the 53th piece anywhere.
yo i need help
You are in a high school competition math channel, please send your question in #calculus or anything more appropriate than competition math
mk i did
It is competition math tho 🤔
Yeah
(this must be a very old problem that occured in the year 1311 cuz all competition math uses the year it occured when it has a 4 digit number)
It’s fine
Like Putnam problems are fine here too
yk on my 2022 TST this question came up
and i was like "what's the significance of 1829"
"surely this isn't some super old contest problem from 1829 is it"
(fyi 1829 is the year abel died)
i was wondering if there are MAA official solutions for AMC 12/AIME after 2007
like the contest problem book
idk i really liked those solutions
anyone got a good tutoring service for amc 10
preferably 1on1 but if its a really good group class then thats fine too
not sure you’re gonna find anyone here
you're supposed to say "a 700 year old problem pog"
whoever invented it had a vision of integrals
bro was ahead of his time
which solutions?
Can anyone assist me in my calculus work?
I'm learning about l’hôpital’s rule
I have no idea what I'm doing
And I'm so shit at derivatives
#calculus , also you don't have to ask to post a problem 💀
lol hi viper
lol hi how are ya
💀
dang it
you ca'nt cross out skull emoji :l
dang bro, how far in? (I say like I would even know anything about the answer you give)
we’ve been covering rings and fields
most recently we’ve been speedrunning introductory linalg again lmao
is it like when they review something right before they do something that uses it? or are they just covering it more "rigorously" or with a new perspective or smthn 💀
how can you say wlog there are 8 more white cells left, when each piece covers both equal number of white and black cells
The 6x6x6 cube is broken into 27 2x2x2 cubes. Then, the checkerboard pattern is applied on these 2x2x2 cubes (and not the 1x1x1 cells), so one of the colors will occupy 14 2x2x2 cubes, and the other 13 2x2x2 cubes. Since each 2x2x2 cube contains 8 individual 1x1x1 cells, whichever color (WLOG white) has 14 2x2x2 cubes will contain 8 more cells.
Initially, only one elf is in a good mood. Every day, a cheerful elf has a chance to make a grumpy friend smile (and thus become cheerful) with probability p (not equal to 0). The elves form a complete graph, meaning every elf is friends with every other elf.
A grumpy elf becomes cheerful if at least one cheerful friend smiles at them. Importantly, an elf in a good mood can smile at multiple grumpy elves in the same day.
We define τ as the total number of days required until all n elves are cheerful. Compute E(τ).
I found some weird sum at the end by considering the variable giving the nb of days to go from k-1 cheerful elves to k cheerful elves, but Python simulations give me another result.
For p=1/2 and n=10, simulation gives 2.07 and formula gives 9 and decimals...
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
hey what do u think this year's kang will have?
can u tell me the things that repeat that i should review please?
Anyone who sees this message, and thank you so much i have the competition tomorrow
how did i fnd 54
hm yea
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
what’s obvious
by symmetry all four trapezoids have the same area
(100-16)/4=21
the area of two of them is 42, which is 42% of the square’s total area (100)
I can’t read Spanish so no it’s not obvious lol
Oh actually I sorta understand mb
Actually I don’t understand bc I can’t apply the 10 and 4 :/
yeah i took it like a couple weeks ago
i cant rlly say
well i dont remember but
you should try to do some mock tests to see the level
then plan how much you will spend on each
and try not to spend too much time on each questions
but imo math kang is rlly ez
just do ur best its not life changing
Ok the only thing that i actually know how to do in this problem is understanding Sn
just a compliance way of saying:
S0 = 1 S1 = x_1+x_2+... +x_n S2 = x_1x_2 + x_1x_3 + ... + x_(n-1)x_n ... Sn = x_1x_2... x_n
idk how to solve the problen doe
wait is this actually n E N
Should be, but excluding n=1
its not spanish😭
i see thx
whatt how is that possible??
it should be secret
ive
blud I did
<@&286206848099549185>
💀
eeeeeeeeeeeewa
f
wesg
erg
er
hrt
jhry
j
ytj
tyj
ty
kj
rd
@everyone
lol
@dawn gyro
wtf was this
Wait then what language was it?
bud its french
Math Kang isn’t very formal
And isn’t considered as important as like amc 10 12 aime Olympiad’s etc
Just like amc 8 it doesn’t lead to anything
So score doesn’t rlly matter
Also did u do good?
in spanish there is plenty of j and the n have accents like this ñ. In french we have a lot of agcents on the es
if you see el or los it's definitely not French
how can I dumb this down cause I know a fair few Romance languages
cause "de" absolutely exists in both Spanish and French, but only French has "de le -> du", and similarly only Italian and Portuguese have "de la -> da"
probably just look at all the words that don't end in a vowel
grand, not grande
deux (-eux is very French), not dos
sur and not sobre
instead of French pourcentage, you would have porcentaje
instead of French est, you would have es or está (estar)
instead of centre you would have centro
I would have thought that the feel of French and Spanish is very very obvious
certainly Italian can get confused for Spanish if you don't know a whole lot
It doesn’t look Spanish or Italian
exactly
it's trying to explain how Romance languages work at a beginner beginner level that's the challenge
@surreal willow
What's the harder between USAJMO and ELMO ?
i did okay, (but i hope i did good)
Did not answer everything but that can be good
cuz wrong answer -1
no answer 0
I think it’s ELMO
ELMO
usajmo leads to MOP
and ELMO is in MOP
ELMO definitely
Thanks
n^3 + 9 = n(n^2 + 13) - (13n - 9) for starters
then you must have |13n - 9| >= n^2 + 13
oh yeah and of course Euclid's algorithm for the gcd of numerator and denominator
yeah next
numerator must be greater than denominator in absolute value
otherwise it'd be a fraction not an integer
yes
(or equal to)
you don't know what Euclid's algorithm is?
yes ik
it is dividing remainder till you get 0
a=bq+r
ohhh
so u were saying division lemma?
yes
if you do it right you should get that 13n - 9 must divide into 2278
ohk ill have to attempt it once more
ok nw
Can someone help me with this question🥲
notice how in $\triangle OFB,$ $\overline{OD}=\overline{DB}$ and $\overline{FD} \perp \overline{OB} \iff \triangle {OFB}$ is isoceles
parabolicinsanity
honestly i'd go on by assigning a radius $r$ and then noticing that $\ \overline{OC}, \overline{OD} = \frac{r}{2}, \overline{OE}, \overline{OF} = r, \overline{FD}=\sqrt{\overline{OE}^2-\overline{OC}^2}$
same for $\triangle DFA$
how do i exactly master no.theory
Guys, what books do you like for studying geometry? I think introduction to geometry by aops wouldn't fit perfectly for me
Did you try the ioqm paper ???
Euclidean Geometry in Math olympiads by Evan Chen, A beautiful journey through Olympiad geometry by stefan would be two great books
With the latter having beginner as well as advanced concepts
Does anyone have book recommendations for graph theory for math competitions?
Interesting, going to check these latter, thanks a lot
What about combinatorics? I was going to read the introduction to combinations by aops, what do you think about this one?
It does a good job explaining, but it is too basic for olympiads
If you feel like the book is around your level, then do have a read at it; for combinatorics it’s mostly about solving problems. I feel like doing the problems in chapter 1 of “principles and techniques in combinatorics” by Kim should be enough to lay a strong foundation
After this move on to doing problems
Sure, thank you
Probably that is why so many people recommend the art and craft of problem solving by paul zeitz and problem solving strategies by arthur engel
Problem solving strategies is good if you know the content already — it is like a buffet of classical problems about the topic. It skips through the examples fairly quickly and its main focus is on problems
then i should know the content first. are you studying for math olympiads either?
Yeah, I am. The content for combinatorics isn’t too much, the first chapter of “principles and techniques in combinatorics” should be enough to get you started.
After this, learn the various applications of “pigeonhole principle” and you can start doing the problems. Doing problems is very helpful because it gives you hands on experience, it builds your intuition which is very important.
I want to participate in purple comet contest and I want to make a team. Is there anyone interested?
I'd use thales theorem ...
ill try
tho im not the best mathematician
thats honestly one of the best
art and craft is a bit too surface level for my taste
it was written only a few years after the original art of problem solving texts by rusczyk and lehoczky
before targeted contest prep books that went into lots of depth on more specialized topics were a thing
My question is how can you come out or observe that the sequence a is slightly larger than n/2 and come out with that solution 🤔
Is there any trick to do so or it’s just observation and imagination?
Thank you
Take years to do so?
I think there will always be some logic behind these sorts of situations but I always can’t figure it out 🥲
I see, do you like any specific combinatorics and number theory books?
let's go
Combinatorics — “problem solving methods in combinatorics”. Number theory — “modern Olympiad number theory”
Sure, just asking to know different opnions. I am aware that there isn't the best book, but it is nice to know different books and different arguments
Do you know 104 number theory problems? People say it is a good book for number theory either
I have heard of it, but I haven’t seen it yet
Introduction to Theory of Number by G.H.Hardy 😎
$lcm(x,y) - gcd(x,y)=243$ Solve in $\mathbb{N}^{*}^{2}$
whoami?
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
don't expect us to do the whole question for you
i have an idea
let d = gcd(x,y), x=dr, y=ds
then use lcm(x,y) = xy/gcd(x,y) and substitute
you get d(rs-1) = 3^5
then you can solve this but i think you get extraneous solutions
i think you have to keep in mind r,s are coprime in order to avoid them
Even if you solve for r and s coprime you’d still get 20 couples
I was wondering if there’s any way to make it easier
me when there’s actually 20 solutions
Idts, I don’t think there is any fast way
Well, if d=3^k then rs=3^5-k + 1, so then rs=3^i+1 for the same range of i. Now just partition prime factors of 3^i+1 since r,s coprime
Oh nice
common sense maybe?
Is x and y coprime?
Oh yeah it is
Wait but if d(ab-1)=243
So then d and ab-1 are integers
Can't you do all combinations of integers that multiply to 243
Then consider when X and y are coprime
x and y aren't necessarily coprime, for example (6,123) is a solution
I was preparing for this exam and came upto this problem can anyone help me
alr lemme try solve
👍 if u solve please explain in easy language my english is little bit poor
it will be solved using telescoping identity
product to sum
Divide and multiply by sin(pi/6)
Take the numerator sin(pi/6) inside the summation ( as it's constant ) and rewrite it as sin ( { π/4 + [(k-1)π]/6 } - { π/4 + kπ/6 } )
Call the bracket of π/4 + [(k-1)π]/6 as A and π/4 + kπ/6 as B
=> you have Sin(A-B) in numerator
Which can be expanded via the identity sin(A-B) = SinACosB - CosASinB
When you you will write it this way and split the denominator as :-
[ (SinACosB)/ denominator ] - [(CosASinB)/denominator ]
And now you just have to notice that the denominator is SinASinB
So on writing it this way, you'll be left with CotB - CotA
And now you can expand the summation and all the guy above said it is sort of a telescopic series
Sort of because usually telescopic series go upto infinity or n
But yeah..things will cancel out and you'll get a nice answer
Here's a nice riddle:
Is there a set of sets of natural numbers A, such that for any two sets, one must be contained in the other, while satisfying the property that |A|=|R|?
Why this is the maximum?
Find how many prime squares are of the form 2p^2-1.
Pell equation
How would i start preparing for international math modelling competition???
I am in grade 11 rn need beginner book or courses to make my foundation strong
stop spamming this question across multiple channels.
hey yall, what are some good slightly-beyond-beginner practice questions for calculus (specifically integration)? I find a lot of them are either way beyond me (the ones from my local math competitions) or use targeted techniques (I've been practicing on khan academy)
like places where I could find them
Same im in gr 11 too and looking into math contests but i am BEYOND cooked school did not prepare me for ts 😭
honestly it's kinda too late for u to start rn
in my country its normal
What is math modelling
$$xf(x+yf(xy)) + f(f(x)) = f(xf(y))^2 + (x+1)f(x)$$
saintyzy
find all functions f: IR -> IR
maths fashion show
R being the set of reals?
and contain meaning subset?
Ts pmo rn ong fr fr
first let us construct such a set which is maximal (as in any subset of N, B, either belongs to A, or there exists an elemnt of A, C, such that B is not a subset of C, and C is not a subset of B) (we can do so by axiom of choice)
the answer to this question is yes If and only if this set can have cardinality |R|
this means if X,Y belong to A, then X union Y belongs to A, and X intersection Y belong to A
hmmm
let us define X-Y, as the set of all elements in X not in Y unioned with the set of all elements in Y not in X
the answer is no
i just have to formalise my proof to make sure it is correct
For now I haven't seen reason why no
For q^2 - 2p^2 = -1 it gave 7 and 41, the next few don’t work, what do I do after? Are there no more solutions after, I don’t know how to proceed
where did you get this problem from?
A math teacher in my school gave it to me
And I thought about it
And I assumed the answer to be yes
Although it's counter intuitive
And then I found out the solution a couple of hours later
I mean, consider a set of even numbers, a set of multiples of 4, one of multiples of 8, etc...
In general let A_n be the set of multiples of 2^n
Let A be the set of those A_n-sets
@dire portal Can I ask if that was the approach you had?
ah fair
it's just that this was on one of my first year problem sheets so i was curious
This doesn't work
It's not even a set of sets
I mistyped
it's countable
i can list them: multiples of 2, multiples of 4, multiples of 8, ...
you need an uncountable collection
Ah, this is an enlightening puzzle. ||Pick an bijection f: ℕ → ℚ and for each a ∈ ℝ, let X_a = {n : f(n) ≤ a}. Then A = {X_a : a ∈ ℝ}, essentially because a < b ⇒ X_a < X_b. Basically X_a shows that you can "represent" real numbers by sets of rational/natural numbers "faithfully" (without "losing information").||
Gg's
bump
do you have an example?
$\int \frac{\sin(x)}{\sin(x) + \cos(x)} ,dx$
hockeydude85
yeh, it was unable to formalise my proof
Not that ridiculous
This idea is not new
interesting
will do
that seems to be around the difficulty I can probably manage lol
skul
<@&268886789983436800>
Find all functions f: Z-> Z such that if $a+b+c=0$ then $f(a)+f(b)+f(c)=a^2+b^2+c^2$
Eric
All I could deduce is that f(0)=0 and f(x)=x^2 + kx, k integer, is a solution
You should be able to derive some more consequences, e.g. a relation between f(a) and f(-a).
Or, if your hypothesis is that f(x)=x²+kx are the only solutions then set f(1)=1+k for some k, and see if you have enough to derive the values of f(-1), f(2), f(3), ...
A pattern should show up.
i think those are the only solutions
using f(a+1)+f(-a)+f(-1), f(a)+f(-a), and f(1)+f(-1) you can find the recurrence f(a+1)=f(a)+2a+f(1)
then you can show by induction that f(a)=a^2+a(f(1)-1) holds for a >= 0,
and you can use f(a)+f(-a) to show it holds for negative a
so f must be one of the functions you described
Imkoma
For a polynomial $P(q)$ with real coefficients, find $12a$ where $a$ is the coefficient of $x^7$ and $P(n) = \sum_{k=1}^{\n} k^8$ where $n \in \mathbb{N}$ ($0 \notin \mathbb{N}$)?
```Compilation error:```! Undefined control sequence.
l.49 ...icient of $x^7$ and $P(n) = \sum_{k=1}^{\n
} k^8$ where $n \in \mathb...
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
Preview: Tightpage -1310720 -1310720 1310720 1310720
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2023/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}{/usr/l```
For a polynomial $P(x)$ with real coefficients, find $12a$ where $a$ is the coefficient of $x^7$ and $P(n) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} k^8$ where $n \in \mathbb{N}$ ($0 \notin \mathbb{N}$).
How do I solve this?
Imkoma
P(n) can be computed directly for arbitrary n
Yes, but how would that be done?
I’m going to sleep so can’t fully explain rn but have a look at this wiki page and see if it helps
Thank you
I see how you could compute the problem with this! Thank you. But how do you even know these formulas? I never even heard of them before. Is this something like you're just supposed to know?
Hi guys its my first high school year and I have just entered 9th grade and want to give prmo/ioqm which is the first stage of math's Olympiad in India I am starting and wanted to seek help of someone more experienced than me in preparation for math's Olympiads pls dm if u can help
Tysm
I mean it was literally a google search

they’re not covered in standard curricula besides the easy cases (p=1,2,3)
there are a couple ways to derive those formulas, one involves another similarly obscure result known as “Newton’s little formula”
when doing comp practice problems what should i be analyzing and taking note of in the solutions for future reference
certainly don't read line by line, just look for the key steps
is it fine i have no idea what the example is talking about
evan writes these mostly for advanced olympiad-level problems but the same advice is still applicable to entry level computational contests
look for the key step from which you can finish the solution on your own
does this guy post his olympiad training materials
he has this whole paid program that he runs
he has some resources on this website
he has a few excerpts available for free
but you can probably find lots of student written resources (of varying levels of quality) on AoPS
the main draw of that site is their huge collection of actual past contest problems
say say must explain
Er
Isn't this live?
While this isn't a qualification exam, I'm not sure whether this would count as cheating per se
For what it's worth, this doesn't mean you're violating anything; this is more a heads-up as to why someone might be reluctant to do this for you
If you have any work done on these, and you want someone to check your working out, I think people here would be more likely to help in that regard
You may use resources such as textbooks, library books, calculators or computers. However, except for your partner, you may not seek help from other people, including people whom you could contact via the internet. Your teacher may discuss your progress with you from time to time.
<@&268886789983436800> potential cheating
The challenge is live from 3 March to 27 June of this year. This is cheating plain and simple.
But that's the equivalent of breaking the volume dial
then they shouldn't have tried to cheat in the first place 🤷♂️
Our future upstanding members of society
He's becoming a lawyer
Chatgpt help me defend my client ass
unironically
one time i was sitting in my dorm lobby
and a buncha sleazy ass business students
were rehearsing a sales pitch for
an aI lEgAL wRitiNg tOOl
🤮
these people have no shame.
You guys seen that clip of "If it may please the court" and it did NOT please the court?
i.e. that obvious AI lawyer introductory argument
I think this was like last week or sth
In unrelated news, that one of the mod's names is "Omnipotent Entity" is major nominative determinism 🤣
(assuming he didn't change his name to that after becoming a mod lol)
I consider $x+y-1 ,\vert, x^2+y^2-1 \implies x+y-1 ,\vert, 2xy$ then
$$ x+y+1 ,\vert, 2xy $$ and
$$ x+y-1 ,\vert, 2xy $$
I consider $ gcd(x+y-1,x+y+1) = 1,2 $
which case 1 is failed
case 2, I got
$$ x+y-1 = 2k $$ and
$$ x+y+1 = 2k+2 $$
I have pairs $(x,y) = (1,2),(2,1)$ for solutions but I don’t know if it’s just fakesolved
Sea
||BMO2 2011 round 2|| for those who want the source
this question too
I given p is prime such that $gcd(a_i,p) = 1$ for $i=1,2,\dots,m$ and given f(n) for " "by FLT I got
$$ f(n+p-1) \equiv f(n) ,(mod ,p)$$
then if $f(n)$ is divisible by some $p$...
but I don't know how to show here
Sea
for stronger bond I have $f(p-1) \equiv f(k(p-1)) \equiv 1 (mod ,p)$
thus $$f(n+k(p-1)) \equiv f(n) (mod, p)$$
Sea
Stuck to prove f(n) con 0 (mod p) for some p ...
It's a mock from my national MO, there's no solution yet
Here is a hard riddle:
Riddle 3.0: Pythagoras's Revenge
A Queen, mage and a goblin are trapped in the top room of a very very high tower.
Below the window, there is a pulley with a rope around it covered in a shield so it cannot be touched.
There is an equal weighted basket at each end of this rope. They managed to escape by using this and a weight they found in the room. As well as a weight on the ground. The rope cannot be handled.
They cannot remove weights without getting in the basket, but they can drop them in.
**The weight on the ground, is in a secure unmovable box, only opened by the mage.**🧙♂️🔒
When the weights are equal, the forces exactly cancel out, due to the frictional lock.
With an imbalance, the extra weight moves the system fully, causing one to go down and the other one up.
It would have been extremely dangerous and too fast if any of them were lowered down weighing 15 lbs more than the contents of the other basket.
In summary (all you need):
One basket coming down brings the other up. Baskets weigh less than 5lb.
When the weights are equal it arrests the motion of the baskets.
Weighing upwards of 15lb more than than the other basket is dangerous. +15 = fine.
Dropping weights onto the ground and not a basket will smash them and spill their water weight everywhere. No removing weights without being in the basket either.
The 15lb can must be obtained by the mage first.
The rope cannot be climbed, nor anything else except climbing out the basket into the window. The mechanism cannot be stopped by jamming.
The Queen weighs 195lb, Mage 165lb, Goblin 90 lb,
The objects weigh [room] 75lb and [ground] 15lb, 🧙♂️ 🔓 but the 165lb Mage must unlock them first.
How did they do it? What steps did they take to all get down from the tower?
I can tell you these things:
The 75lb object was put into the upper basket. For some reasons it doesn't explode. Then the goblin goes into the new upper basket. He gets to the ground, still in the basket, he could leave or stay. <- It's a hint.
It would be helpful if you are able to solve and give me the solution how you did in the next 2-4 hours
If a basket is on the ground, can you throw weights or people in it from the top of the tower?
mb, thats a stupid qs, obv no
No
Here's a question: Prove [(5^100) + (5^75) + (5^50)+(5^25) + 1] is composite.
it's a geometric series
yea bro, ik that its equal to [(5^125 - 1)/(5^25 - 1]
its a pth cyclotomic polynomial problem
Oh right sorry
and u can't whip out wolfram alpha during an olympiad
you have to prove it
not necessarily factorise it
Here you go buddy (Ik this is absolutely useless)
thanks, but yea
,w 3597750 prime factors
RIP
Here's another one: Find all primes p and q s.t. p^2 + 7pq + q^2 is the square of an integer
Finite answer?
In a functional equation, why can't you always assume $f(x)$ is constant and solve for that constant?
ProjectTime
I haven't heard anything of it in my textbook
Bcoz, functions are not necessarily constant? duh
yea, obv p = q is a solution for all integers, but are there any for p not equal to q
because its often times not???
you need to find all solutions to a functional equation
It definitely almost always says this but often times doesn't list the constant solutions
constant solutions ought to count, in my opinion
got it! || (3,11) ||
i think that's the only other one
hmm there's a problem with my argument, i'm missing the p=q solutions
oh i see i missed some cases
ok yeah there's no other solutions
|| (n+p+q)(n-p-q)=5pq ||
|| n+p+q | 5pq, so n+p+q ∈ {5,5p,5q,pq,5pq} (assume n>= 0 wlog) ||
|| case 5pq: so solutions ||
|| case pq: (3,11), (5,5), (11,3) ||
|| cases 5q,5p give p=q ||
|| case 5: no solutions ||
yeah, nice
Sure it does
Here
Quick question: is there a general form/fast way I can compute the possible moduli of $x^n \pmod{a}?$
For instance, $n^2 \equiv 0,1 \pmod{4}$ or $n^3 \equiv -1,0,1 \pmod{9}.$ I can compute the values using some algebra, but it is time consuming. Any answers appreciated, thank you!
Imkoma
S'ABCD=121cm2 and S'AGC=82.5cm2 , S'EFGH=441cm2, FIND S of ABE
S(AEC)=S(AGC) since GE||AC. And S(ABC)=S(ABCD)/2. So, S(EFGH) is not necessary if ABCD and EFGH are known to be squares.
wait im slow
can you explain S(AEC)=S(AGC)
they have common base AC and equal heights because EG||AC. Therefore have equal areas.
wait youre right
bro solved this with a single braincell
this makes so much sense
thx
i have 1 more thing to ask
the quickest way i can think of is to just square 2...n-2 mod n
hello, is there any roadmap for learning mathematics?
which level are you at now?
what are you studying / what have you previously studied?
I just realized this is supposed to be a college guy server but I am at grade 10, have completed everything of grade 10 with a lot of time to focus on maths. I was looking fo r a roadmap (I lack guidance)
nope! we do all levels of maths on this server
you're talking in the competition maths channel
do you want something for comp maths then?
yes sir, it will be great. I am sorry for my misconceptions.
here is some general information about Indian olympiads
I am not familiar with those, so I'll refer you to the American olympiad instead
https://artofproblemsolving.com/store - here are some books you can buy
Buy print or online math books for gifted students. Purchase a full math curriculum plus math contest preparation for elementary through high school.
but there are a lot of free resources too on AoPS
there's also this which has examples of questions by difficulty, from basic level to IMO
Evan Chen's EGMO is really good for Olympiad geometry
thank you, it is really helpful. I will surely go through it.
no worries!
still better than whatever I was trying to do for half an hour. Thanks.
Hello, how does hmmt registration thingy work?
Some1 help I’m supposed to make an answer sheet for a competition that my non-profit is hosting but idk how to do one of the questions.
Freddy exists in the coordinate plane and is currently at the origin Freddie can make hops from (x,y) to (x+1,y) or from (x,y) to (x,y+1). If Freddie can never go above the line x=0.5x. How many ways can Freddie reach to point (10,5). Note that Freddie can touch the line y=0.5x
you really couldn't have googled it?
LMGTFY
does anyone have free online resources specifically targetting intermediate to hard logartihm and exponential problems?
i would greatly apreciate ti
that does not require calculus to solve
Ty
AIME often has a log problem early on
MadAsMaths is goated
do you have China MO resources? or other is fine
You can find past questions on AoPS
nope
Hey is there anyone here who ever partcipated in IMO??
Could u gave me tips how to be Excel at math where do i have start ???
,w 1 prime factors
o
1 isn't prime lol
actually WA never said that 1 was prime if you read closely
ohhh thanks for pointing out
im not gonna lie, how does one cheat on a homework
i mean technically its not a test
You can still cheat yourself out of the learning experience it would be to try to figure out a solution yourself.
(There are also places where homework solutions are graded and contribute to the student's academic scores).
Try
prepping for amc 10, which aops book (intro to counting and probability, geometry, algebra, or number theory) should I start with
you can get through all by the time it rolls around
i would start with algebra tho
true there are like 9 months left
also if you dont mind would you also recommend which one I should do after algebra
once you've gotten a baseline level of theory that you need the best practice is just drilling lots of problems
idk man
its been like half a decade since i did those intro books
js learn the stuff
you should be able to finish all of them
and then volume 1 of aops is good
Alright tysm for the help
Yo
topic channels usually aren't very active but you can post some problems here and spark some discussion
k
as long as you're exploring new problems and topics and you're enjoying it
you'll start to see some improvement quickly :)
i would have no idea how to do this, if it didn't basically just follow the proof of wolstenholme's theorem
common denominator?
that would be the first step
you know that all denominator in the LHS do not have p as divisor
if you try an do it
it becomes something like $((p-1)!)^p\cdot\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}(i^{-1})^{p}$
buboblakistoni
and then use something with mod inverse maybe
yeah wait
you just need $\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}(i^{-1})^{p}\equiv 0\pmod {p^3}$
buboblakistoni
yes
however
you have inverses since gcd(i,p)=1 like you said
note that each term has a different mod inverse
so you now just need $\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}i^p\equiv 0\pmod {p^3}$
buboblakistoni
i think the mod would need to be p for that to work
yeah
and you know that p>3
im thinking that you can generalise it
playing around with small numbers i get:
$\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}i^p\equiv 0\pmod {p^{p-1}}$
buboblakistoni
let p=3, then (1/1)^3+(1/2)^3 = 1+14^3 = 18 (mod 27) but 1^3 + 2^3 = 9 (mod 27)
so you can't change the sum of i^-p to a sum of i^p (mod p^3)
you can do it (mod p) and that is part of the solution later
first you need to || pair ith term with (p-i)th term ||
Hey, I am trying to collect people that are interersted in joining a study group for the AIME. I am looking for people who live in the bay area and can meet every weekend. I am currently working on problems 1-6 on the AIME, and am looking for someone who is on my level or above so that we can pace and push each other. respond to this, or dm me if you are interested-bay area preferrably a high schooler as well please
Should I study/know Legendre's symbol? For context, I won't be taking a number theory course anytime soon but I want to know if I should learn it for math competitions.
And quadratic reciprocity
If you are going to, it goes hand in hand with this
I've seldom seen applications of these in a comp problem tho
Thank you
Theres is some ISL N9 that gets nuked by Legendre symbols I think
Hi sir does anybody have good dpps or sheets for maths advanced level
Any specific topic???
Is N9 a difficulty rating?
mod means modulo?
yeah
you meant to shortlist?
imo shortlist
9th number theory problem in isl
oh thanks
Find max |z|=4 of |(75+117i)z+(96+144)/z|.
it's not nuked by legendre symbols, there just happens to be a 1 line soln using legendre symbols
IMOSL 2022 N8 is still insanely difficult tho
in recent years they are trying to avoid problems that are insta nuked by advanced theory
it could be somewhat useful
i think in general learning a bit of in depth NT can be quite useful for developing intuition etc. for working mod p
normally you don't really need Q.R. for oly problems but this depends on the olympiad
for example, balkan MO and RMM tend to use more theory than IMO
you can read about legendre/jacobi symbols in evan chen's otis excerpts https://web.evanchen.cc/textbooks/OTIS-Excerpts.pdf
I agree
Is a one line solution not a nuke though even if it’s not the intended solution
I find that USAMO and USTSTST/TST also can be quite theory heavy but yeah RMM is the main one
oh right that's what u meant
i think in my mind if a question is nuked by X then there's an easy to spot fast solution that uses X
the question look so innocent but …
yeah that should be the aim for all competitions
also hi LY!
2016 USAMO hook length formula controversy 
when you try your best but you don't succeed
Prove that the green shaded area is the same as the orange shaded area.
k=4 is an counterexample lmfao
i don't understand hint 66
why should || (p-2)^(p-1) not be congruent to 1 mod p^2 ? ||
isn’t this the pizza theorem
I need to know other opinion about this problem: Given a square ABCD and we choose three random points XYZ on the the sides of the square, M-masscenter of triangle XYZ. We need to find the area of geometric place of M(assume that side of the square equals 1). I think that the answer is this kinda cross, but im not sure.
yes,sorry, forgot to mention
I thought this way and assumed that by the symmetry we got the cross, but i didn't check it actually
dang this problem is insane
it seems right to me
Nothing to prove just look at it and you will know
pay attention to the definition of A. If a number x is not in A, that means x^(p-1) is congruent to 1 mod p^2.
the hint is saying that p-2 and p-4 cannot both simultaneously not be in A. that is, at least one of them must be in A.
i can explain how you finish the problem from these hints if you would like
yeah, that matches with the stackexchange post i found
hint: whenever you are adding two complex numbers of fixed magnitudes, the maximum will occur when they have the same argument. (it helps to think about it geometrically - this is just the triangle inequality)
it says let (p-2)^(p-1) = 1 (mod p^2) and then simplify and square this equation
then let (p-4)^(p-1) = 1 (mod p^2)
is that what you had in mind?
or if you have another approach i'd be interested to hear it too
yes, i think so
you get something along the lines of 4^(p-1) * (p+1) = 1 (mod p^2)
this whole part of the solution is essentially black magic
it feels that way to me too
i can try to explain some motivation if you would like
yeah sure
let's say a number a is good if a^(p-1) = 1 mod p^2
hint 1 tells us that a and p-a cannot both be good
or in other words, if a is good, then p-a is bad
yes
the goal of the problem is to find 2 consecutive bad numbers
so a good thought process is to proceed by contradiction
assume that from 1 to p-1, no 2 consecutive numbers are good
if a,a+1 are 2 consecutive good numbers, then p-a,p-a-1 are 2 consecutive bad numbers
so now we know no 2 consecutive numbers are good and no 2 consecutive numbers are bad
and since 1 is good, this means numbers alternate good-bad-good-bad-... from 1 to p-1
at this point, the "main part" of the solution is completed
starting from a relatively week assumption, we deduced exactly which numbers must be good and bad
and all we need to do is force a contradiction somehow
I have to eat dinner but I'll check this later, thanks
now, which of "good" and "bad" is a stronger condition?
"good" is much stronger, since it tells you something is equal to 1 rather than not equal
so at this point it makes sense to focus on the good numbers
one property you can observe is that good numbers are multiplicative. that is, if a and b are good, then ab is good
this isn't very useful for small numbers, since we have 1,3,5,7,... are all good and multiplying 2 odd numbers just yields another odd number
but for numbers close to p-1, multiplying and expanding can yield nice identities
for example, p-2 is good --> (p-2)^2 is good --> 4p - 4 is good
and eventually you can use such identities to force a contradiction
also, because of how strong the condition here is, there is a wide variety of ways to finish the problem
for example, one strategy might be to multiply together odd numbers < p to produce an odd number slightly over p^2, which turns into an even number upon reduction modulo p
let me know if you have any other questions!
thanks
Thanks, the answer was quite ugly so I was suspicious
did u get an answer yet?
As i said, i think that answer is 5/9 for square with 1 side lenght
so ur finding the centroid of a triangle
yes
so what do u need help with
I dont know am i doing right or not
It seems like okay but i noticed that thing only in geogebra and not properly sure
THANK YOU
Hello, I have proved an inequality using the "tangent line" method (basically it's a plane), but I am not sure if my approach is correct given the fact the function i am using is not convex. I described by problem here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/5063308/proving-a-three-variable-cyclical-inequality-using-the-tangent-plane-method-e . Anyone can give an opinion is my reasoning is sound.
I have a question, still working on it.
go back to jail! 
Show your work
Twin primes are like 27 and 29 right?
indeed
No, 27 isn’t a prime
twin prime conjecture is about actual primes
so like 29, 31
@high goblet they don’t understand 🙁
Indeed
Well well well, who do we have here?
I think we know us in a parallel universe
Yeah... are you from the crank server?
Huh? No?
I might have confused you with someone else
i mean the neo-pythagoreanism one
It looks kinda like this
I don't remember joining the server... Yeah that has its reasoning
😭
do you guys hate irrationals then? 🤔
Not me, but they do
It worked, the answer is indeed 40, but the time it took, would probably not be possible if i was taking the olympiad.
How could I solve this one faster? ( I used chatgpt only to translate the problem, the translation is correct )
My method was to see, with each one of the seven possibilities when n = 3, how would the winner team change the other teams depending on its results
which book is this from?
modern olympiad number theory
Do you like it? I am eventually going to need some better books in the future
isn't that supposed to be a good thing
if you don't do hard problems you're not pushing your abilities
i wonder if i'd learn faster by doing problems of intermediate difficulty
actually the problems in MONT have a range of difficulties
some are easy
i think it's a pretty good book
i learned a lot of my number theory by working through it
yes, it's indeed not obvious
at this point, the problem has been reduced from a number theory problem to a combinatorics problem. specifically, a graph theory problem
suppose you construct a graph in which you connect two pairs whenever they're congruent
then the vertices will be grouped into connected components for each remainder, and each connected component will moreover be a clique (although we won't actually need this ladder fact!)
so we just need to show that in a graph with p vertices and at most (p-1)/2 edges, there are at least (p+1)/2 connected components
and this is now a general graph theory fact that has nothing to do with the original number theoretic phrasing of the problem
in general, a graph on n vertices with k edges has at least n-k connected components
why? start out with the empty graph, and add in each edge one at a time. the number of connected components decreases by at most 1 for each edge, done.
nice!
that's elegant
does anyone have any idea on why i wouldn't read the entire solution, as said by evan chen? Maybe I solved the problem using a worst method, and by reading the entire solution, i would understand a possibly better method, wouldn't i?
i know that he said that remembering only the core of the solution is easier than remembering everything, but as i said, i might learn more knowing a better method told by the solution than sticking with the method i proposed, that might not be the best, right?
well i think if you notice the key idea, that might be enough to see if they used a similar approach to you, or if it's a better method.
but i also don't think reading the whole solution is necessarily bad
he's saying you shouldn't read line by line
if you're reading line by line then either:
- you didn't try the problem, in which case ur not really gaining anything - the steps you read will be unmotivated and you won't understand where they're coming from since you didn't attempt the problem
or - the problem is way too hard for you and you can't pick out the key details
there's nothing wrong with reading solutions to a problem after you've done the problem
you might have a worse method and it might shed some light on what could've been a better solution
but crucially, ur doing problems to improve & get better next time
after you've given a hard problem a proper attempt, you might then read the solution and it might say "we prove that ABCD is cyclic" or "we claim that quantity X is non-increasing"
for someone experienced, that should be all they need to finish the question
you should then think about how you could've come up with those steps yourself
hard questions are normally never literally packed with all hard ideas, usually they only have a few key results that you need to prove to finish the problem
have you read his article in full? i thought it gave a pretty good explanation of what he meant with some illustrative examples
Yes I did, indeed his explanation was pretty good
There is this article here that is pretty interesting either https://blog.evanchen.cc/2014/07/27/what-leads-to-success-at-math-contests/
help pls
There are several approaches for this, you could coordbash, or use properties of median in right triangle + Stewart’s theorem on AGC
Here is coordbash:
||
Let B=(0,0), A=(a,0), C=(0,c). Then len BG=len G-B=len G.
By definition of centroid, G=(A+B+C)/3, so G=(a/3,c/3)=(a,c)/3. So our goal is sqrt(a^2+c^2)/3.
Connect C to midpoint M_AB=(a/2,0) similarly B to M_AC=(a/2,c/2) A to M_BC=(0,c/2)
We are given 3=len GC, so 3^2=9=len^2 GC. But GC=C-G=(0,c)-(a/3,c/3)=(-a/3,2c/3), then:
9=(a^2+4c^2)/9
Repeat with 4=len GA, so 16=len^2 GA=len^2 (a-a/3,c/3)=len^2 (2a/3,c/3)
16=(4a^2+c^2)/9
But now we can get len G by adding the equations:
5(a^2+c^2)/9 = 25
(a^2+c^2)/3^2=5
len G = sqrt(5).
In general,
len BG = sqrt((CG^2+AG^2)/5)
||
Here is Stewart’s:
||
Let x=BG. Note that the median from B has length 3x/2 (centroid) so AC has length 3x (right triangle median to hypotenuse).
Thus by Stewart’s theorem on AGC, man+dad=bmb+cnc
(3x)[(3x/2)^2+(1/2x)^2]=(3x/2)(3^2+4^2)
x^2 (9/4+1/4)=25/2
x=sqrt(5).
||
You can also notice that || the distance from one of the vertices to the centroid is 2/3 of that of the median coming through the same vertex. Then you have the lengths of two medians and have to find the third one which comes of vertex B. Use the formula for length of a median in terms of sides of the triangle, and then add the squares of all three medians of the triangle. Then use properties of a right triangle which are Pythagoras theorem and the fact that say BG extends to meet AC at X, that X is the circumcenter of triangle ABC. Then you can find the length of the median coming from vertex B and finally multiply back by 2/3 || to find what BG is, which is || sqrt5 ||
Putnam 2015 A2 ^
In many solution writeups i see ||By induction, a_n = ... but how do they get this form for a_n, do they use the characteristic equation thing for linear recurrences or are they just like doing it by inspection lmfao||
If anyone cna help ^ IT would be appreciated. Just about one small part of the solution not the whole thing
||yes, it is the characteristic equation thing||
crazy they omit these things in the proof lol i must just be that noob
Hmm, but those characteristic roots don't even look very promising for prime factors ...
Hmm, in the first writeup I could google, the Binet-like closed-form solution to the recurrence is the least opaque step.
Ah, there was one with a better-explained reasoning.
What does "calculating prime fact" mean there?
like uhhh
wait I cannot rephrase my question lol
Okay
Imagine you have a really large number, let's say a million. Find the prime factors of 1 million.
2^6·5^6?
What I want to know here is what's the fastest way to calculate for the prime factors of 1 million (and some numbers)
I think you're trying to ask for efficient algorithms to factor arbitrary large numbers.
Yes
There's no (non-quantum) algorithm that's known to complete in polynomial time.
But it's an area of intense research and lots of work on getting up to several hundred digits in a feasible time (with computers), not least because the assumption that factorization is hard is the key assumption behind RSA-derived cryptosystems.
For numbers in competition problems, trial division is usually the best feasible way. (And have the prime factorization of the current year and a few numbers on each side memorized...)
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Has anyone tried an AoPS course, what was it like, do you think they're worth it?
lol ty
i js used pythagorean theorem tho
cuz i was scared to use it
i have a bad history with 2 varialbe squares
tysm
what do you mean by opaque fact just curious
Hard to understand.
The solution I found first just derived the clised formula and then immediately observed, "because a2015/a5 is both rational and an algebraic integer ..."
That it is an algebraic integer may be an easy consequence of some standard ANT fact, but not one I'm actively aware of...
Later I did find a more accessible walkthrough pointing out that if we use the binomial theorem on each (2015/5)th power, the terms with sqrt3 in them would all cancel out pairwise.
i thought it was because the quotient must be of the form a + b sqrt(3) but since it is the quotient of two integers, it must be rational, so b must be 0 and the quotient must be an integer (this was my impression after looking at the solution)
That seems to assume you already know the quotient has the form a + b sqrt3 with integer a.
Without further, the most I can see is that it is in Q[sqrt3].
(And of course in Q itself, so that in redundant)
did you see the solution here https://kskedlaya.org/putnam-archive/2015s.pdf
No, that was not among the writeups I found.
ohh ok
i think this makes it maybe more clear for you not sure
i was just wondering because i myself didn’t see anything with the binomial theorem
Yes, that makes perfect sense.
The one with the binomial theorem went, roughly:
$$ a_{2015} = \frac{(\alpha^5)^{403}+(\beta^5)^{403}}{2} $$
with $\alpha^5 = 362+k\sqrt3$ and $\beta^5 = 362-k\sqrt3$ conjugate in $\mathbb Z[\sqrt3]$. If we use the binomial theorem on each of the to 403th powers, each of the terms with an $\emph{odd}$ power of $k\sqrt3$ is canceled by the corresponding term on the other side, and all the terms that are left has at least one factor of 362.
The one you link to is more straightforward, I think.
Troposphere
ah i see
(I suppose the term-for-term cancellation is not even strictly necessary here, because we know the terms with odd powers of sqrt3 must cancel out taken all together because a2015 is known to be an integer, hence rational).
Is Putnam worth preparing for
most of the MIT kids who dominate the putnam each year don't actually seriously study for it
they coast on their prior olympiad training
unless you're gunning for a top score probably not worth imo
i took like 3-4 aops courses in the past 1-2 years
they're good but you just really need to actually spend time to study the topics on your own
or else you're just wasting money
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
hmm i'd suggest trying to draw in some extra lines and see if you can get anywhere
i'm trying this problem out myself too
ok hint: gonna need some trig
oh so draw the altitude of aeh to ae
and u get a 45 45 90 tirangle
and call the point x
so hxe is scongruent to edf
hx = 4 and ax = 4
xe - 7-4 = 3
3^2+4^2 = 25
oh smart
i went full trig bash mode 😭 found cos GHC=sin AHE and then law of sines'd it
Which ones, how were they?
I used to really good at math used to solve questions in my head when i was little now i can't even count
Really good to see people being competitive in math
lowkey I forgot MATHCOUNTS is sponsored by RTX now after Raytheon dropped their sponsorship 
(the national countdown is going on rn)
Raytheon is the subsidiary I think
It’s either that or they changed their name in 2023
c & p, number theory, pre alg B, and mathcounts/amc 8
they were good
Which numbers have this fact?
Take the sum of the number. (x)
Take a divisor of that number. (y)
Do this: y - x. The result has to be a divisor of the number. Let's call them Wood Numbers!
Anyone good at ap physics 1 that can help me study or give me tips
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Good math = good physics 😔 or so I thought
Physics is so humbling
you might get better results asking in the physics server
invite link can be found in the #old-network channel
true but nobody can help you unless you ask smthn
anyone giving IMO?
Help me please to solve the problem, A* is reflection of A against IO, we need to proof that YDA* are collinear, i tried to do smth, but only figured out some inscribed quads and i tried to prove that D lie on radical axis YA* ,but stuck, also, i figured out that D is radical center of (ABC), (XYA*) and (BIC) circles
Help
well all these points are at the same height: where FP cuts AG, where PE cuts GD, and where PH cuts GC
yeah it's super hard to find the exact boundaries of the region: this is my best guess
I just stuck on finding the intercepted volume
Ik but the problem is how?
similarity
ah consider the face BCHG: then you know that PH must cut GC
because B, C, H, G, P lie on the same face
similarly, B, D, E, G, P share the same face, so PE cuts GD
I don’t think it apply to this question
it does!!
like the question is of course how exactly you use it
We can’t prove that they are similar
Then which part should we use
yes we can
also another helpful thing is that y = 3 - x intersects y = x at (1.5, 1.5)
(parallel lines/planes can make a lot of similar triangles appear)
yes then you can show that these three intersection points do in fact form a square
consider face by face as I said

