#competition-math
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
And my parents are well...
Don't let that demotivate you
not pleased
The more you let externalities impact you the more toxic your mindset will get and the less you will improve
I know it's hard but just focus on the math
No problem
Very wise words indeed
I was 1.5 points away from AIME qual this year in 12B
What can I do to qualify next year
Lock in next year
I meant what should I study
Bc I exhausted most of the previous tests already
Btw are the current cutoffs on aops official
i was surprised at 10a scores
the difference between 10a and 10b was huge
had I only got 4.5 marks more....
😭
thing is i have no life
better no life than no skill
My parents are really mad which only makes it worse
if you took the 10 that means you have a few more chances
They were just like "This is completely your fault."
bruh 😭
This one kid in my garde who I beat last year got Honor Roll on 10
And my parents keep comparing me to him
the specific problems on the test are out of your control, you can be the most prepared you could possibly be
and get blindsided by some really nasty tricky problem
it's happened to me a few times too many 😔
I somehow got 3 of the last 5 right but missed the 5th question
:o
If I'd gottn all 18 questions I attempted right I would have definitely made AIME
But no
Ofc I get 3 wrong
did you leave a lot of blanks in the middle questions?
Yep
i get the sense that those questions especially
I only got like 3 of them right
have been creeping up in difficulty the last few years
and sap your time so that the end becomes even harder bc time pressure
If I'd gotten more of the middle questions
I would have made AIME with flying colors this year
What makes it worse is watching other people celebrate because they made AIME even though I beat them last year
Cool
Where are you now?
3rd year of college
Nice
and even worse is the fact that some of these kids make fun of me and my friends in nsfw ways
which is why I ditched everyone in my school on discord
ikr
but alas the stereotype of the antisocial math nerd is not without its basis in reality 
i knew a few such assholes myself while in middle/high school
You'd think they were just quiet and calm
But some of these kids start verbally attacking you
i used to be a bit of a self-absorbed asshat myself lmao
My parents are like "If they really say things like this online, how do you explain their results in competitions"
but got humbled pretty quickly once i got destroyed on my first few contests
people can be book smart but absolute assholes (not social smart) at the same time
not rocket science 😭
Fact is the guy in my grae who made honor roll for amc 10 this year scared my friend into keeping her mouth shut after saying creepy things to her in both dms and gcs
aw hell nah what 😭😭😭😭
I saw the things he told her and she won't even let me tell a teacher
She's that scared
Yet if I try to stand up to some jerk after finally cracking
Then their "protectiveness" comes flying
ANd hits you in the face
is there a teacher that you or your friend trust to talk to about this or nah
Nope
man
Too scared
😔
i get it yea
i hear it's gotten way worse post covid
yep
i was in late HS already when it happened so i dont think i really saw the full extent of what it did
for the younger kids
I was in like elementary school post covid
damn
And some boys were trying to trick me into calling one of them "daddy"
This was 5th grade
It gets worse
In our school Nationla Science Bowl server
These idiots added an e-girl bot that says weird nsfw stuff
I left that server a while ago just to get away from these idiots
😭 bruh
y'know how older people are always like "omg we're so worried about the younger generation?"
They have a right to
now im starting to see why 😭
when they focus their energy on academic stuff
it can come at the cost of their social development
actively antisocial
This is purposely trying to disturb people just to get a rise out of then
ye
exactly
Yk about gartic phone right?
Like a game here?
yeah i've played it a couple times
These kids
drawing lewd shit?
A month or two ago
😭
Exactly
About my friends
And describing this stuff
My friends who were being described were traumatized
damn
They literally compete for who has the most trophies on brawlstars
And they each have like 50,000 trophies
how about people outside their immediate circles
where talking that weird shit is
not accepted
evidently not
😭
Because if they did
Everyone would figure out that soemthing is up
With their studious nerd facade
does your school try to restrict cellphone usage during class
They try
But tbh the tecahers do not care
then what's the point of such a policy 😭
Kids can literally curse and say b-word
if it isn't even enforced
And they do nothing
Ikr
They just take out thier phones in class and teachers might say
"put your phone away" and gove up
The only teacher who actually tries is the art teacher
and he already is a major target for the "popular athletic boys"
oh god that kinda student 💀
Why do they even bother taking certain classes I wonder
yea i tended to just avoid them while i was in HS
i didn't really see them much anyway bc i was APmaxxing
Sadly my art class is full of them
Yeah in hs
These idiots tend to pop up less in more academic settings
Since they are grade level their whole life
ye
Yeah
Idk
I'm in a ranting mood today
Really sorry if I bothered you
thanks though
npnp
practise olympiads instead
the common trap ppl fall into is that they keep practising for their current stage
but this has diminishing returns
when u've done all the past papers for ur current stage, u should just start doing the harder stage
i'm not american, i've never done any of the american competitions but if AIME is next then probs start preparing for that even though u haven't qualified yet
i'll link the british maths olympiad here, BMO1 isn't too hard and should be doable (i'm not sure how this compares to american competitions tho)
practise
$\frac{(a/2R)^2 (b/2R)^2}{(c/2R)^2} = \frac{a^2 b^2}{c^2 (4R^2)}$
south
I'm kinda interested on this one
it's from my country's math olympiad of the national stage
Inequality spam
Write it as a product, if it's a positive integer then there will be n+1 factors of 2 on the top.
It cycles through a,b,c in that order
(a,b,c) -> (b,c,a) -> (c,a,b)
E.g. $\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}} a^2b = a^2b + b^2c + c^2a$
daniel
what about 4 tuples
then it's (a,b,c,d) -> (b,c,d,a) -> (c,d,a,b) -> (d,a,b,c)
ohh
im thinking about using that notation for symmetric polynomial
is it applicable
for that you can use $\sum_{\mathrm{sym}}$
daniel
but it's not exactly the same as symmetric polynomials
sym means go through all permutations
so e.g. $\sum_{\mathrm{sym}}a^2b = a^2b + ab^2 + b^2c + bc^2 + c^2a + ca^2=\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}a^2b + \sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}ab^2$
daniel
I don't think there's any established notation for it
I just think of it as the sum of every product involving $k$ distinct elements
daniel
Ofc bruh
The thing abiut symmetric notation is that
It gets complicated after 4 terms
It's easy to prove by induction that (2^n-1)!!=(2^n+1) mod (2^(n+1)). Just partition it into pairs (2^(n-1)-a)*(2^(n-1)+a) for n>2.
Source?
if y'all need some competition math
What level MATHCOUNTS is this?
For how many natural numbers less than 100 is the product of the number's distinct prime factors equal to 6?
what is necessary and sufficient for the product of the distinct prime factors to be equal to 6
yes
so how many numbers less than 100 are only made up of 3's and 2's
just count that
How
What 3^4=81?
, calc 3^4
Result:
81
Sorry that's true
So just add 1 to the cases 3^3, 3^2, 3^1, since 2*3^4 > 100
can you help me compute the combinations

You want to count how many twos you can add before it exceeds 100
3^2=9, if we multiply this by something greater than 11, it's gonna exceed 100
So how many powers of two are there less than or equal to 11? 2, 4 and 8
So there are 3 valid numbers with 3^2
Repeat this for the others
,calc 3^3
Result:
27
,calc 2^4
Result:
16
Result:
72
,calc 3 * 2^5
Result:
96
- 3^1 up to 2^5
i) 3^3 up to 2^1
ii) 3^2 up to 2^3
iii) 3^1 up to 2^5
@prisma loom
is i) ii) and iii) correct?
how do we know we are not double counting?
theres only one way to write a number as its prime factors
okay so let me see if I did it right
i) 1 x 5
ii) 3 x 1
iii) 1 x 5
or am I tripping?
@inner ermine
my badd
wait what?
how is that related
1 is the number of 3s
or the number of 2s
basically 1 x 5 + 3 x 1 + 1x5 numbers that have a product of distinnct prime factors that are equal to 6
which are less than 100
i) 3³ up to 2¹ ==> 3³ x 2¹ = 27 x 2 = 54
ii) 3² up to 2³ ==> (3² x 2³) + (3² x 2²) + (3² x 2¹) = (72) + (36) + (18)
iii) 3¹ up to 2⁵ ==> (3 x 2⁵) + (3 x 2⁴) + (3 x 2³) + (3 x 2²) + (3 x 2¹) = (96) + (48) + (24) + (12) + (6)
so in total is 9 numbers, right?
Yeah sounds true
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
can I get some hints?
You need to find the greatest power of 10 that divides this number
Well I know it is 20! but how do we get the answer without a massacre of numbers
Think about which numbers in the product 20! contribute towards the power of ten dividing it
there will always be more 2s than 5s
so the trick is to count the number of 5s, then there will always be a corresponding 2 to make 10
also you don't have to worry about 5^2 = 25, whereas you do need to consider powers of 5 for other questions
random sample
can some one sovle this
i dont get the notation on the first line
which argument is the base of those logs?
the x or the x_i?
Well what have you tried and we’ll give you a hint
No point solving it for you
I believe it’s base 10 I.e just lg
It’s log(x * x1)
i tried graphing |lnx-lnx_1| +(|lnx +lnx_1|
thats it
and
yea
idk what to do next
i am soo confused @deft wraith
try bounding the LHS using triangle inequality?
alr
use taylor expansion of e
WTH
break your term into three parts and compare coefficients of each part with above
simplify the expression
you can either use taylor series or only partial fractions
for prime $p$, find all positive integers $(a,b,c)$ such that
$$a^p+b^p=p^c$$
Skissue ping4response
by fermats little theorem, a+b mod p=0
for p=2, we see that (1,1,1) works, WLOG a>=b, since a+b mod 2=0 thwn either a,b is even or a,b is odd, if its even thwn we can take out a 2 to make it such that arleast one of them is even, if both of them arent even then a+b mod 2=/=0 so we can factor out 2's so that they are odd, (from the image) mod 4 we can get 1=3 mod 4 (for c>1) which isnt true, for c=1 then it would hold, which only happens at a=b=1, note that since we factored 2's from the start, we can multiply them by say 2^n and it would still hold, thus one of the solutions are (2^n,2^n,2n+1) for p=2, and those are the only solutions for p=2
not sure how to continue this, by lte lemma $c=1+v_p(a+b)$
Skissue ping4response
#help-28 message
theres some ideas thrown around here
Bound using this
Also that only holds when p doesn't divide both a and b
So you need to consider that case as well
How do we get this?
The lifting the exponent lemma
if p divides both then you can divide it out, and subtract it from c
Yes but then you don't necessarily have that p divides a + b
once you have a solution (a,b,c) then you can make more with (pa, pb, c+p) so you can boil it down to these types of solutions
we do
Why
reduce a^p+b^p=p^c mod p
oh yea I'm a moron
all good lol
I suppose jumping off and expanding from here with other stuff we can make these solutions: (ap^n, bp^n, pn+1+v_p(a+b))
but not super exciting without a "primitive" solution to start from
I think technically some of the LTE is part of factoring for odd p
since a+b=p^i and a^{p-1} - a^{p-2}b + ... - b^{p-1} = p^j with i+j=c
kind of vaguely relates to the proof of LTE if I remember
To end in a zero you need a factor of 10
Prime factorising it, we get 5 but 2 isn't there which is needed, so it isn't going to have da zero
can anyone give me a neat problem?
Prove that if you have a sphere tangent to a plane then the projection through the north pole of any circle on the surface of the sphere not passing through the north pole to the plane is a circle
any neat non bashy solution?
(i want to find the minimum top length, the top is parralel to the bottom, but the method i thought of is too bashy)
so you have a cone
through the northpole
no
not a cone
a slanted cone?
let us take any random point as the north pole
and the bottom plane as the plane
a circle on a sphere is the intersection of a plane and the sphere
let us look at it in the other way
we have a circle
and we have a plane
true
and we want the set of points that will take the circle to a circle on the plane
i saw this question in aops
want the solution?
sure
meth>maths
wish they would focus on this problem 🥹
doesn't zsigmondy work lol
if p | a+b, then a^p + b^p has a prime factor not equal to p (apart from some specific counterexample) - qed
otherwise if p | a & p | b, then i sps you can factor out the p until one of them is coprime to reduce to the p | a+b case
True
Here is a solution without zsig: We have $\nu_p(a+b)= c-1$ as discussed above, hence we are assuming $p\nmid a,b$. Let $a+b = p^{c-1}k$. For $p\ge 4$, we have $a^p + b^p > (a+b)^2$, hence we get $p^c > (a+b)^2 = p^{2c-2}k^2\implies 1 > p^{c-2}k^2$, contradiction. Hence $p<4$. The case $p=2$ was already solved above. Hence let $p=3$. Then $a^3 + b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab + b^2) = 3^{c-1}\cdot k \cdot(a^2- ab + b^2) = 3^c\implies k(a^2 - ab + b^2)= 3$. Hence either $a^2-ab + b^2 = 1$ or $a^2-ab + b^2 = 3$. It is easily seen that the only solutions to $a^2-ab + b^2 = 1$ is $(a,b)=(1,1)$. But that gives $2=3^{c-1}$, contradiction. Hence $a^2-ab+b^2=3$. Again it is easily checked that the only solutions to this are $(a,b)=(1,2)$ or $(a,b)=(2,1)$. This gives $a+b = 3\implies c=2$, so the only primitive solutions for odd primes are $(a,b,c,p)=(1,2,2,3)$ and $(a,b,c,p)=(2,1,2,3)$. (which are precisely the exception to zsigmondy)
daniel
thank you
not quite the same lol
that's p!, not p^c
It's completely different in fact
oh wow thanks, that makes alot of sense
i had a feeling finding an upper bound was key but couldnt think of how to make it
Find all sequence a_1, a_2,... of integers such that for all k≥2024, the following expression is an integer.
has anyone here ever solved all imo questions in a comp setting
imo perfect scorers?
i did nto get the last line of this
i mean how a1 is divisible by every prime greater than N hwo didi they deduce that
Because k doesn't divide (k-1)!, if k is prime, hence it must divide a1
Because we can take k to be arbitrarily large primes, a1 must be divisible by arbitrarily large primes, hence it's zero
ohhh
i did nto get it what did they do with p taking common out
sorry i am not familiar with number theory and proofs
I don't get what you mean
what did they do after p>N,m line
It's just factoring and creating common factors
Why can't I analogously prove that ai=0 for other i=2,3,... like I prove a1=0
Oh ok I just realized
Umm
So since p is prime
Unless it's 2
It can be factored
Yeah irdk
wtf am i looking at
im genuinely so cooked
the shit im seeing in this server looks like something from another planet
i can barely do the simplest things
lwk it's not that deep
Not everyone is good at NT
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
Can I get some hints
I guess one way is extended euclidean algo to solve 3b+2a=1, get all the solutions to that, then multiply through by 8 and then check the condition
might be quicker ways than that but I think that would get it done at least
why 3b+2a=1
and then multiply by 8, also idk extended euclidian algo, is it possible to learn or do I need math maturity
I think you just have to learn the algorithm, I guess to elaborate what I'm really talking about is Bezout's Identity if you want to look that up
basically the idea is 3b+2a=gcd(3,2) is solved by the extended euclidean algorithm, and it turns out there are infinitely many pairs (a,b) that you can get once you have one solution
then multiplying through by 8 means you get a solution to the original problem you asked
hi guys how do i learn competition maths
Look for competitive exam first? Olympiad perhaps?
Googling itself will help a lot, or if you have decided to prepare for a programme like olympiad as I said, specify your interest first... there sure will be a lot of people who could help you
You can evaluate the sum, write it in sigma notation
If you haven't done it before, look at how to evaluate: $$\sum_{k=0}^{n} k^m a^k$$
Max
||Integrate wrt a, then multiply by a, then integrate wrt a, then multiply by a... do this k times||
where have you been
before whenever I looked at this channel at any given point of time I saw at least one message from you
Let m,n be integers greater than 2. In a m×n grid, floor(mn/3) -1 of the cells are marked. Prove there exists a 3×2 subgrid which contains at most 1 marked cell.
what grade are you in at school
grade 10
Blud did not react to my essay though
didn't see this mb
hmmmm
Read now atleast
i would reccomend the aops books https://artofproblemsolving.com/store/list/aops-curriculum?srsltid=AfmBOor6REpa6LO5kiB8jWTbKnXZhNg6zYMvS6BJBg_hp_sitNnIp89_
Our complete math curriculum challenges high-performing math students in middle and high school to apply new problem-solving skills to difficult problems.
i mean yeah but how do i know learn how to do the questions (responding to bakuza)
What are you trying to crack??
how do i actually learn how to do the problems, thats the question i intended
Kay... for your school exams?...
You guys call it graduation right?
After 10th or 12th...
I don't think 10th grader in any country need calculus ?
@barren grail This is how I would start off, once you have completed these books then you'll be able to understand most other advanced materials. All books I am referencing can be found here (https://artofproblemsolving.com/store/list/aops-curriculum?srsltid=AfmBOor6REpa6LO5kiB8jWTbKnXZhNg6zYMvS6BJBg_hp_sitNnIp89_)
Algebra
- Intermediate Algebra. (start with Introduction to Algebra if this is too hard).
- Precalculus
Combinatorics
- Introduction to Counting & Probability
- Intermediate Counting & Probability
Number Theory
- Introduction to Number Theory
Geometry
- Introduction to Geometry
Our complete math curriculum challenges high-performing math students in middle and high school to apply new problem-solving skills to difficult problems.
My bad, when I revisited the website, I noticed scroll too hard at the first time
what books do u reccomend
Since I'm not from any western country, I have no idea about the level questions asked in there
So I don't
the level of questions asked in what
In schools of your country
I'm talking about IMO and competetive math preperation
I just know that the syllabus is same for all
I've never prepared, infact I'll start after some time when my teachers say that we have our basics cleared
Idk much about olympiad and all also
When will bmo1 results come out 
thanks man
Somebody?
Please write the question a little more readable way
Somebody?
Im failing the aime
what?

if tan is -ve it means it is either in 2nd or fourth quadrant
so cos can be -ve or sin can be -ve
if cos is given to be +ve and tan is -ve it means angle is in fourth quadrant
At least you didn't miss it by 4.5 points
can i get some help
like I tried to learn extended eulcidian but maybe I lack the mathematical maturity
Suppose that $a$ and $b$ are integers such that$$3b = 8 - 2a.$$How many of the first six positive integers must be divisors of $2b + 12$?
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
maybe this problem is too much for my level of understanding of number theory?
how do I know if I am not good enough?
this was suggested in alcumus as the next exercise to solve , should be appropriate but idk, why is so hard
This is too much effort. Best bet (this is a general problem solving strat) is to try to narrow down your possibilities off the bat with a simple pair like when a=1.
Then you can consider those possibilities instead
Hint: ||parity (aka whether something is even or odd)||
try modulus??
That normally works for divisibility problems
LIke find a(mod 3) and then fond b(mod 3)
because we like know that a and b are integers
yes
theres a list of them
how
when a = 1
3b = 8-2a
3b = 8-2
3b = 6
b = 2
so b is even?
Concluding that in general based off of one case isn't a sufficient proof, but it's easy to show by ||taking both sides mod 2||.
yeah I am trying to take both sides mod 2 but I am having trouble with the modular arithmetic
3b mod 2 = 1b, for left hand of the equation?
like if we divide 3b by 2 we get remainder 1b
or at the very least dividing 3 by 2 leaves remainder of 1, idk what to do with the b tho
like for the right hand side
8 mod 2 = 0 because 8 is even right?
and for 2a:
2a mod 2 = 0
aswell because 2a is always even right?
like substituting back the results after taking mod 2 I get
1b = 0 - 0
idk what to do with that though
is someone following? I think I might be tripping here
@ivory ember
did you give it a try hypercube?
$3b \equiv b \pmod{2}, 8-2a \equiv 0 \pmod{2} \implies b \equiv 0 \pmod{2}$.
Civil Service Pigeon
This is too much effort. Best bet (this is a general problem solving strat) is to try to narrow down your possibilities off the bat with a simple pair like when a=1.
using this, you should get that the only possibilities after this are 1, 2, and 4
1 is obvious
2 is also obvious
for a = 1 , b is even
For 4, b being even -> 2b is a multiple of 4, and 12 is also a multiple of 4
and b is also even for all values of a
when a = 2
3b = 8 - 2a
3b = 8 -4
3b = 4
b = 4/3
not even
wait but 4/3 what is it
what is 3/2 supposed to mean here
typo, I was trying out a =2
.
b is integer
yeah
so how is this relevant?
a = 2 doesnt work ig
because b is integer
I might be tripping
when a = 3
3b = 8 -6
3b = 2
b = 2/3
b is integer a = 3 is useless
0 is even
Recall that a number n is even iff n=2k for some integer k
since 0=2(0), 0 is even
ok thanks
how did you got that b is divisible by 2
am I reading correctly?
-
3b mod 2 = b
-
(8 -2a) mod 2 = 0
2.1) 8 mod 2 = 0
2.2) (-2a) mod 2 = ((-2) mod 2) * ((a) mod 2 )
2.3) (-2) mod 2 = 0
2.4) 0 * (a mod 2) = 0 -
==> b mod 2 = 0?
yeah
This is too much effort. Best bet (this is a general problem solving strat) is to try to narrow down your possibilities off the bat with a simple pair like when a=1.
when a = 5
3b = 8 - 10
3b = -2
b = -2/3
b is integer a = 5 is useless
when a = 6
3b = 8 -10
b = -2/3
b is integer a = 6 is useless
if b is even
then 2b + 12 is even
and thus 2b+12 is only divisible by the values of a such that b is even since 8-2a is even
for a = 1 b is even
for a = 2 b is not even
for a = 3 b is not even
for a = 4 b is even
for a = 5 b is not even
for a = 6 b is not even
we know 8-2a is even because we showed that in 2 to 2,4
idk really tbh
Let b=2k for some integer k
here you are assuming b is even
We legit proved it earlier
yeah, seems like a legit proof
but idk, I lack math maturity
I cant tell if its legit
also I never understood why we took cases a from 1 to 6
so we can see if b is even or odd
but then we proved it
I mean it feels surreal, I am new to modular arithmetic sorry if I sound like a clownass
???
This is too much effort. Best bet (this is a general problem solving strat) is to try to narrow down your possibilities off the bat with a simple pair like when a=1.
We have the pair (a,b)=(1,2)
So 2b+12=16 for this case
My point doing this was that we can immediately exclude the possibilities of 3,5,6 being divisors since they don’t divide 16
And can just consider 1,2,4
1 is obvious
For 2, note that 2b+12=2(b+6), hence 2b+12 is always even
For 4, note that taking both sides of the equation modulo 2 yields b=0 mod 2 (we did this earlier).
So, b=2k for some integer k -> 2b+12=4k+12=4(k+3), hence 2b+12 is a multiple of 4
ok
thank you for the help, I think I got it, I appreciate it
If the qth term of an AP is p and the pth term of an AP is q then prove that the nth term is p+q-n
Challenge!!
erm what
the words are not wording
hint: let q = p + n
you cant just do that
q,p and n are all given to you
oh right
just write the pth and qth term of the AP
you got 2 eqns and 2 variables
the first term and the common difference
solve for them then it just plugging in the values in a_n
I guess then, in q - p terms the difference is p - q, so the common difference is -1
Mod 3 and mod 4
Not yet
I was grinding physics
I'm trash anyway
this isn't really modular arithmetic, the problem itself isn't really that challenging, it's more testing ur mathematical maturity to understand what you have to do
the problem asks which of the first 6 positive integers must always be divisors of 2b+12
so we need to see if 1,2,3,4,5,6 always divide 2b+12
a=1 gives b=2 so that tells us that 3,5 and 6 cannot always be factors of 2b+12
obviously 1 and 2 are factors of 2b+12
then just taking mod 2 => b is even, so 4 is always a factor of 2b+12
so the answer is 1,2,4
Perfect
Perfect
any tips how to prepare on math olympics?
study
but there is so much

There is not that much
study yor weak spots
hmm
do a practice test
then geometry ig
see what you SUCK at
I did, I am waiting for results
ok
anything for first class of gymnasium?
just do problems
start with easier olympiads then make ur way to harder ones
it'll be slow at the start but it'll be worth it
If you're looking for a start point:
Set y=0 and x=-f(0)
You'll get f(-f(0))=0
Then set x=y=-f(0), you'll find that
f(0)=0 or 1, consider each case separately
Not sure how to prove the f(0)=0 has no solutions as the function does not necessarily need to be continuous, if it was continuous you could show the only possible function is the 0 function which ofc doesn't work
||the only solution is f(x)=x+1 ?||
Nvm I got it, lmk if u want a full sol
yes
where's the problem from may i ask?
huh ic ty, not aware of that competition
np
First set $y=0, x=-f(0)$, you get that $f(-f(0))=0$ as already discussed. We can make use of this by setting $x=y=-f(0)$, the equation reduces to $f(0)=f(0)^2$, so either $f(0)=0 or 1$.
Consider Case 1: $f(0)=0$.
Set $x=0$, you get $f(f(y))=f(2f(y))$, inductively you can hence show that $f(f(y))=f(2^nf(y))$. Set $c=f(y)\in\mathbb{R}$, you hence have $f(c)=f(2^n c)$. (Made a simple flaw in my proof, I think this is only valid for natural number $n$, if we could show that it was valid for all integers $n$, you could make a continuity argument arguing that we must have either $f(x)=0$ or $f(x)$ is piecewise constant, both wouldnt satisfy the original equation)
Consider case 2: $f(0)=1$. Set $y=0$, you get $f(x)+f(1)=f(x+2)$. In other words $f(x)$ must be linear. So set $f(x)=ax+b$, input this into the original equation and compare coefficients (as both sides must be equal for ALL x,y), solving you get $a=b=1$, so $f(x)=x+1$ is the only solution.
Max
ur deduction for f being linear isn't quite correct
since f : R -> R rather than f:N -> N
Yep, but I have made the sturdy assumption that we have continuity otherwise the question wouldnt have a satisfying answer
you can prove f(x) = x+1 without assuming continuity
i'm kinda tired rn, maybe even slightly ill so i can provide more detailed suggestions tmr if u want me to
but you have an exposed xy - you should be able to prove f is injective
once you have f is injective, plug stuff in to prove f(x) = x+1
you can use the fact f(0) = 0 or 1 to get 2 cases
also f(x) + f(1) = f(x+2) doesn't imply linear even for continuous functions
i.e. something like f(x) = cos x but you need to shift stuff and stretch stuff so everything works
Yeah now thinking about it I havent used the xy fact apart from comparing coefficients which isnt really significant enough
If that were true it would be written in the problem statement
ik im making a joke lmao
Ok sorry
nah its fine, but its true, the solution will likely be continuous or at the worst piecewise discontinuous
yep
my face when:
no it's just that this is like a functional equation on a shortlist
||that has uncountably many points of discontinuity lmao||
||in fact, the cardinality of the set of solns is 2^|R| lmao||
Is it ISL?
yh
also like this is one of the hardest FEs that exist lol
What year is it?
2004 A6 i believe
this one is probably really nice, but on the face of it cancelling things looks like a pain because of the squares
No, ones that exploit the Mobius transform trick are the hardest 
No I am still in high school
I will probably next year and year after that since my country is quite easy
ah fair, gl!
Thank you
i almost did IMO but didn't quite make the UK team, my years were fairly competitive
the UK does fairly well in competitions so it's on the harder end to get in
So f must be even or odd
that's not necessarily true
there exists a non-even non-odd function that satisfies the FE
f(x)=0 :3
Welp I'm stupid
oh wait nvm
So people who go to IMO use China TST to practice?
Unless it's the sleep derprivation:
$$f(x^2+y^2+2f(xy))=(f(x+y))^2$$
Set $x=y$, you get:
$$f(2x^2+2f(x^2))=f(2x)^2$$,
Then set $x:=-x$, you also get:
$f(-2x)^2=f(2x^2+2f(x^2))$$
So $$f(2x)^2-f(-2x)^2=0 \Rightarrow f(2x)=-f(-2x) \text{ or } f(2x)=f(2x)$
$
Max
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
AINT NO WAY
I'VE HEARD OF THIS GUY
MY FRIEND WON'T STOP TALKING ABOUT HIM
Seriously why is this wrong? Or am I losing my mind
it's the piecewise trap
you've shown that for every value of x, either f(2x) = -f(-2x) or f(2x) = f(-2x)
Ah
but that doesn't exclude i.e. f(1) = f(-1), f(2) = -f(-2)
Helloings chat
Hello
Damn
IMO
I just bought the AoPS textbook, i really wanna do the AMC10 next year
So yeah i suck basically
no wonder bro is so damn cracked
lol ty
i mean... a lot of my friends actually did IMO
cus like the entirety of the ppl who made IMO/almost made IMO for the UK study maths at trinity cambridge lol
Where do you find your friends😭
i mean i met them at the selection camps so that's a bit cheating
but like we all study at cambridge together now
The only place where i've met people interested in maths is that one summer camp at UChicago
Awesome experience tbh, sadly i doubt that i will get accepted into the actual university
No shame in that, it's a very good uni, but just hit the grind and see if u can improve ur odds
Probably what i'll be doing for the next 3 1/2 years of my life
Without a calculator find the leading digit of 9875^24
Uhhh
Real
Anyone wanna give this a go?
partial fractions I guess... 😬
I think so lol
counting gotta be harder than calculus man
source
2004 ISL A6
Damn
IMO has always been my dream
Terence tao thought 27 is prime
Any non bashy ideas? (this is a russia problem, so there is a non bashy soln)
Seems like smth with trig
We could make an equation for finding alpha and beta based on time by using trig and the height of the plane
grothendieck thought 57 was prime
Ha i’m better than Terence
Say that $a_0$ js the initial angle from point A and $a_1$ is the angle from point A after one second.
Then, $|a_0-a_1|= a$
for later use in trig, we can drop the absolute values since most trig functions are even
$a_0 - a_1 = a$
That’s what i came up with
Epic latex fail
Oops
(use backwards slashes)
Bible Camp Victim
Bruh i forgor i’m on my phone
hm
hint: prove that the minimum base in that trapezoid is when the angle between its diagonals is 90-(alpha+beta)/2. The rest is easy.
geogebra 🙂
first i fixed smaller base. Then the problem is equivalent to maximizing the larger base. Then we have a common chord for two circles with inscribed angles alpha and beta. And then I just used coordinates to find that the radiuses of these circles to points A and B should be parallel. That is a fairly short solution. tho it still requires finding the derivative. So, it's not purely geometric
maybe
in my solution the key point is the fact that if f(x)=sqrt(x^2+2ax+b), then f'(x)=(x+a)/f(x). So if you manage to interpret this geometrically then you are done. Or probably there is some other more pleasant shortcut.
hm
i got it
no one sec
I'd say combi algorithms are def harder
Yea
Find, without a calculator, the leading digit of 9875^24
You can mess around with logs but that seems really cumbersome
it's ~5 operations to do ^24
so maybe you can just do it, multiply the first digits and ignore the rest somehow
could it work?
taking first two digits didn't work
well it did i guess
you get 7744
and the right asnwer is 7
it works if you start with 99
and doesn't if you start with 98
very coincidentally right
Anyone here good at geometry
Landmark results in geometry and number theory marked an exciting year for mathematics.
Geometry is Pure Mathematics
amc scores for those who qualified came out
Is this solution for imo 2010 p1 valid?
Did I pass pointwise problem with this solution?
question:find 2-6+12-20......-9702+9900 and my answer is 7352 is that correct
your soln is fine, but i do have some comments about your write-up
- you should probably almost always start your write-up with "we claim the functions which work are [etc]"
- clearly plugging them in we see they work (or whatever)
if you don't highlight that you've checked ur functions work, u'll lose 1 mark
(just look at 2010 P1 results and see the number of ppl on 6/7)
starting off a write-up with like "we claim these work, clearly these work" is like a really nice way to guarantee you don't forget
i'd probably put slightly more detail on why floor(f(y)) = 0 means f(x) = 0 for all x, it's not immediate
and also probably be a bit more explicit with why C has to be 1 <= C < 2
Hi
hi! 
Does Cam do anything special for Xmas
cambridge term finished like ages ago lol
our term lengths are 8 weeks 8 weeks 7 weeks which is like :zoom:
but we have bridgemas which is on nov 25th lmao
anyway yeah there's like bridgemas/xmas related stuff near the end of term, i don't think i really did any of those tho
Olay
Yeah I wrote it hastily I forgot several things😅
Thanks 👍
LY is not that old
nw!
wait what was the original message lol?
Did you do the 2010 IMO or something
Ask them
oh ahaha lmao
,w \sum^{99}_{n=1} (n^2+n)(-1)^(n-1)
Would solving math Olympiad problems make me a better problem solver (in general, not just in math)?
could I guess
Ofc
Mostly in stem fields tho prob
Yeah I’m a CS student and a decent programmer
does anyone want some free MO handouts?
i have 2 handouts that have AIME problems
i think they also explain the answer
I didn't make AIME but according to my sources, my score is high enough that people who would get a score similar to mine almost always make AIME the next year
So yes please
Maybe not 2025 AIME
But if I prepare from now I can cook on the 2026 AMC and AIME
what have you tried so far
i feel like a nice factoring will be possible with a bit of manipulation
maybe subtracting the equations
hello!
my score on the amc 10A was an 85.5, and I was wondering how I could improve that in time for next year?
any ideas?
Prove that there are infinitely many pairs of positive integers $(x, y, z)$ such that:
$$x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + xy + yz + zx = 6xyz$$
saintyzy
ive seen a solution using pells equation but i think theres a way easier solution
They say if you do all AMC practice tests, all AIME problems in last 40 years(4x from what i've heard), all Intermediate level algebra, comb, number theory, and geometry problems on AoPS, and all ARML/Purple Comet problems, you're guaranteed 130+ score next year and maybe even USA(J)MO
I got 100.5 on AMC 10B so I missed AIME by 4.5 points
I'm planning to try it it, and if it works, then we'll know for sure
It seems like a tall task, but you'll end up becoming so orz it will seem like the same problem at some point
Then you know you have become orz
Of course the solutions must be read and understood in detail, and you need to know every single one
But uh I mean I am an 8th grader and I haven't made AIME myself as of now so I might not know what I'm talking about 🤷♀️
square both sides????
alr I’ll try that ty
Anyone got hints?
What grade are you in just curious?
It's ok if you're not comfortable sharing
Write out a few terms?
Like
rationalize the denominator
Interesting
I think it was like 1,2,5/2,29/10,941/290 or something
$x_{n+1} + 2 = (sqrt(x_n) + 1)^2$
THESE {}
Ah ty
oh yeah
no wait
Hypercube
XD
not like we have any better ideas 
sqrt(x_n) + 1/sqrt(x_n)
My parents are gonna deconstruct my toilet if I don't solve this problem
wait yall literally a cube and hypercube
what was i actually thinking ☠️
das crazy
It's a coincidence
Hey

It's supposed to be an AMC level question
The 25th one apparently
I wasn't even close
Get that one outta here
chatgpt came up with an absolutely beautiful solution
Actually crazy
what is it?

Chatgpt using calc
this aint involve calculus doe :l
$x_n>8$, $x_{n-1}+1/x_{n-1}>8$, so $x_{n-1}>4+\sqrt{15}$
Cube
How nasty would the recursion get
LAS PERSONAS QUE SABEN
RESUELVAN
AHORA
AHORA
$x_n>a, x_{n-1}+1/x_{n-1}>a, x_{n-1}>\frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4}}{2}$
Cube
Cube
Cube
Hint: Consider $x_{n+1}^2$.
Civil Service Pigeon
I'll try it but I resolved the answer came about through estimation or calculus
How would that help ?
Same bro
Hi
Its my first year in math comps but j rlly enjoy studying for them
Been doing them since 8 yr old
same
Singapore stuff
Nicee
do you guys reccomend RSM for AIME. I want to quali for USAMO in 2026
What rsm
Idk sorry
so I really need something that can boost me
no its in the U.S
the name of the school is just russian school of math
My goal is to get a medal in the national olympiad since its my first year and frmn next year maybe compete in the jbmo
nicee
rooting for you
im just tryna get AMO
USAMO
because I dont think I have time for it
def not a medal
but maybe a qualification
I would be happy with that
Ure a junior too right?
ofc a medal would be amazing
sophmore
I live in Singapore


