#help-4
1 messages · Page 58 of 1
👍 so how does all of this help me move forward from this
There'd be an (x - 5) multiplied to the 2x
Yes, (2x(x - 5) - 4x²)
Just to be sure I keep the other stuff too or no
Just his
Yes yes, keep it outside
This
The (x - 5)³
Yeah that's fine, now you can take -2x common from (-2x² - 10x)
So you can take it out
Whoops, it'd be +5, we've already taken the minus sign outside
Yes it is
Anything I can write to show how I went from the first part to the second
I know that I will look back and be confused on how I went from point a to point b
Well, the first step shouldn't be there at all
The second step should be the first step
Also if it makes it easier for you, then you can make the (x - 5) inside as (x - 5)¹
Yes, also close the bracket after 4x²
Well, you've taken (x - 5)³ common
Not 4x² too, 4x² remains inside, like that's why we take something common in the first place
So like that then
No mate, the bracket is after 4x² and before (x - 5)³
Sorry mate, I gotta go now
It's getting pretty late here
That’s alright thank you I was just tryna make sense of what u meant here
Alright mate
Im js mathed out thanks for helping out being so patient
No problem dude, maybe consider taking a break
Kinda hard when I get assigned so math work a day half of it my teacher explains horribly
Damn man, well we're here to help you, and there are people better than me here, but still consider taking like a 15 min break or something
Yeah still got 5ish problems left and I will Ty
U had a lot of patience today that I don’t have
😭
Well I shouldn't be helping people if I'm not patient :)
For that I thank you
Have a good rest of your night
Have a nice one yourself mate
Fixed my step 1 with the brackets n stuff
Time for number 19
I should start first by looking for a GCF
Where I’m at
First bracket is a sum of two cubes
Second bracket is a difference of two squares
?
Can someone let me know if I did this right?
Number 19
@wintry cape Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> ?
Yes it's alright
But did u need to expand the sum of cube and sum of squares?
Omg I can go further still 😭
Fed up with factoring so don’t mind me
But do u hv the choice to not expand this and keep it as is for an answer
2y(27x³+y³)(9x²-4y²)
I circled my answer
Look under that
I did go further
I know that u went further and u did right
Really 😭 thank you
I’m sorry I am really exhausted with this worksheet
Right after I finish these last 2

Let’s attempt to do them on my own first
Good luck on that
Turns out I’m forgetting how to count
3 problems left
Did I do number 21 correct
U r forgetting the y⁵ at the beginning
That’s all I forgot right
Yippee now I can say dos problems left
I probably did this wrong but I’m unsure
Where to go with this
Number 22
Notice that u can take 2(x+4)⁵ common from each term
Ok what do you do with the left ^2
Expand,most likely
Explain more on this 😭
$2(x+4)^{7} -36x(x+4)^{5} =2(x+4)^{5}[(x+4)^{2} -18x]$
vικτιμιζερ
$2(x+4)^{5}[(x+4)^{2} -18x]=2(x+4)^{5}[x^{2}+2.4.x+16-18x]$
vικτιμιζερ
Now factorize the 3rd bracket portion
Ok so start with this
What happened to the -36
Can u mark the part u dont understand
You made the 36 into 18
Wouldn’t the 2 also change to just 1
It change to 1
Lemme write it down ig
👍
See if u get it now
If not mark it
If yes,then proceed with factorizing x²-10x+16
Yes
I still don’t really see how you went from this to that
And also what do the 3 lines supposed to show
Do u see that
And (x+4)^2 is?
U have a line under that too
Tbh I’m a lot more confused now 😭
Okay see 5xy-10x²y
The gcf is 5xy
So u write 5xy(1-2x)
That's what i m doing
Do u know this that x⁵.x⁶=x^(5+6)=x^11
It's the same (x+4)^7=(x+4)^(5+2)=(x+4)^5 .(x+4)^2
I took the (x+4)^5 common
Which leaves a (x+4)^2
. You mean multiplying right
Ok
I see
U just broken it up
But going back to the 36 and 2
See 2y -36x
Gcf is 2
So 2(y-18x)
Right?
Similarly 2(x+4)⁷ -36x(x+4)⁵
=2(x+4)⁵[(x+4)²-18x]
There is no 2 in front of (x+4)²
Got it okay
I know your saying you just did 2(y-18x) and it makes sense like that but nothing is written like that in what you broke down here
Okay note that the y in the example i showed is (x+4)² ,now do u see anything?
I think u should try to solve it urself,and then u will understand
Which example
I’m so lost on solving it myself 😭
The 2(y-18x)
@wintry cape Has your question been resolved?
I need to finish this 😭
But I really wanna understand what I’m doing
What do you need help on?
take 2(x + 4)^5 common
I’m looking back is this basically what im doing
xfilin
These a class notes btw
To simplify the expression $$2(x+4)^{7}-36x(x+4)^{5}$$, we first look for common factors.Identify the common factors: Both terms have a factor of 2 and a factor of $$(x+4)^{5}$$Factor out the common terms: We pull out $$2(x+4)^{5}$$ from both parts of the expression.$$2(x+4)^{7}$$ divided by $$2(x+4)^{5}$$ leaves us with $$(x+4)^{2}$$$$-36x(x+4)^{5}$$ divided by $$2(x+4)^{5}$$ leaves us with $$-18x$$So, the expression becomes $$2(x+4)^{5}[(x+4)^{2} - 18x]$$Simplify inside the brackets: We expand $$(x+4)^{2}$$ which is $$x^{2} + 8x + 16$$Now, the expression inside the brackets is $$x^{2} + 8x + 16 - 18x$$Combine like terms: We combine the 'x' terms: $$8x - 18x = -10x$$The expression inside the brackets is now $$x^{2} - 10x + 16$$Factor the quadratic: We need to find two numbers that multiply to 16 and add up to -10. These numbers are -2 and -8.So, $$x^{2} - 10x + 16$$ factors into $$(x-2)(x-8)$$Final Answer: Putting it all together, the simplified expression is $$2(x+4)^{5}(x-2)(x-8)$$

xfilin
Brodie💀 I think I’m locked in
How do you type so fast..
Typing club 😭
3 minutes is a long time,
But anyway What will the answer be then?
How do you go from there to there
Welcome back 
Dude did you take a break yet😭
That's the opposite😭
And I’ve went do a lot of other work
Cus I’ve been on the same math worksheet for hours
And my teacher is practically impossible to understand and deal with
Oh well
@rigid pivot @marble arch
Yes?
I've honestly got no clue dude, who wrote it?
Also can you guys see this class notes and see if that’s what we are doing here
Maybe I learned it another way and you guys are showing it another and I’m confused that way
OR
it’s just a complete different topic and I’m sleep deprived
But how did you go from 2(x+4)^5 to ^7 part
xfilin
I’m still on abt the -18x bc Im not grasphing that- how did you get that
xfilin
Did we divide the whole equation by the common term?
Wow r we on the same math now
Huh
R u done with 22
Still are on the same equation.
If that’s what u mean
I think I’ve figured out this is the same thing as u substitution
You guys were showing it to me a different way then I learned it
Oh so plug in x+4=y
Doesnt hurt to learn both ways
Yeah I did all of that
Yeah of course
But that’s why I was so unfamiliar
Good so far,factorize the last portion as well
Yep working on it
I get it
That thought crossed my mind but i thought would be increasing steps for no reason
Can’t thank all of you guys enough omg
For your helpfulness and support
I appreciate it plenty
At the end it was u who solved it tho
😭 still
I hope to develop the amount of patience you all have
Yes dude that looks correct
just coming in to say, well done!

All of you are amazing 😭 thank you so much
I am happy to say
U can close this ticket
You gotta do it mate
It's fine
Closed by @wintry cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a most curious math problem appeared on the server some time ago and filled me with zeitgeist. i finally found an equation for the answer but im not sure how to unravel the trigonometry. any hints would be appreciated orz $\frac{\sin(3x)}{\sin(135-3x)} = \frac{\sin(x)}{\sin(45-x)}$
Plvzfq_rit
(have to solve for x)
Have you tried opening sin(3x)
like thru a trig identity?
i havent yet no
Whoa, that might just do it I realised
hmm lemme try that, as well as open out the other stuff
Alright sure, let me know once you get it (which you should unless there's a gimmick or I'm missing something)
ok... i think i mightve gone astray and did something wrong with my calculations
first i tried to expand the stuff at the bottom
$\frac{\sin(3x)}{\sin(135)\cos(3x)-\cos(135)\sin(3x)} = \frac{\sin(x)}{\sin(45)\cos(x)-\cos(45)\sin(x)}$
Plvzfq_rit
then those constants have special values, so i could do...
$\frac{\sin(3x)}{\cos(3x)+\sin(3x)} = \frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)-\sin(x)}$
Plvzfq_rit
hmm from there i tried expanding the left hand side with the reduction formula so...
No no
sin(135 - 3x) = sin(3(45 - x))
That's also sin3, well, let's say y, that's also sin3y
No problem mate
Plvzfq_rit
hmm i think i got it
yep this should be good
thanks again doctorstrangejr!
.close
Closed by @river arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I show a causal link between data using a line graph?
you mean linear regression? 
nah just have to prove that there is a link between hours of studying and the grades using "appropriate visualisations"
ya but I need to show using an appropriate graph "Create appropriate visualisations (e.g., scatter plots, histograms, etc)"
@scenic zealot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @scenic zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it was supposed to be a 3 letter code and i thought the one for bifid was the easiest. However, i think i messed up since i got tabonexo myosorfs for the qclxqjpo poojjsrc
im stuck on deciphering this
First part just looks like binary numbers that presumably correspond to the alphabet
Ohh what i did was converting them to denary then counting the individual letters 😭 maybe thats why that part went wrong too
110 = 6,
1 2 3 4 5 6
a b c d e f
@lime dome Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lime dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ignore hte numbers and letters (its from a random youtube video)
the circle on the left is split into many (proper) triangles like shown on the left. then its rearranged to from that rectangle... yeah, if hte radius is 10, how much longer will the rectangle be from the circle?
so he wants to compare between the diameter of the circle and the longer length of the rectangle. the diamter of the circle is 2r., and the longer length of the rectangle is basically the circumference of the circle (this is my thought process, not stating facts)
so that should be 2 pi r - 2r ---> 20 pi - 20 --> which has pi...? the answer doesnt have pi in it
or thats how it was shown in the video.
the answer is like... 20?
where did i go wrong
the answer doesn't have pi in it
uhhh what. 20???
you're gonna have to link the video cause you're not making any sense rn
I changed the given information so ignore the 20.
the rectangle, if we imagine its imperfections to be small enough not to matter, has height r and length pi r
it sounds like the definition of pi to me? 
Maybe they round up the answer so pi isn't in here?
the video is random and embarassing nobody judge me 😡.
i mean we're trying to get to the bottom of your confusion not judge you
why do you think the answer has no pi in it?
the video
give me one second
ill link it
im just finding the proper timestamps
15:22 for the question
18:01 for the right answer (10)
i changed the context from diameter to radius but that shouldnt add a pi
Migaku is offering a 50% discount on their Lifetime subscription, along with an additional free month on Standard and Early Access subscriptions: https://migaku.com/CantoMando
We are switching things up a bit! This week we are putting Sheldon, a Mechanical Engineer, up against a Chinese 5th grader to see who is smarter? Chinese kids have been k...
if you comment on the choice of video
i will find you,
Okay
hm
ok so the English of this problem ain't so great
but what i THINK is happening
is that they're asking for the difference between the shapes' perimeters.
would that justify the existance of pi
and this difference, to put it simply, consists entirely of the 2 vertical sides of the rectangle.
so the answer really is 2r
the perimeter of a rectangle...?
i... dont understand what is unclear
cant we consider the perimeter of the rectangle to be the hypotenuse of two lengths r and 2pi r
that still gives pi
hypotenuse of the 2 lengths r and 2 pi r?
like a right triangle in the rectangle
what hypotenuse
there are no right angled triangles in this problem
from a right triangle that splits the rectangle in half
afaik there arent even triangles in this problem
the angles of a rectangle arent 90s?
look at what the kid draws
I'm sorry but what exactly are you talking about?
see how his sides are bumpy
he claims that the 2 bumpy sides are just the exterior of the circle
nice.
so they will be just the same as the circumference in length
so the difference will just be the extra 2r pieces on the 2 ends
so the differences is 2r = d = 10
oh yes i messed up on that its only pi r for each
the kid spoke too quickly.
it helps that i understand whats hes saying rather than the shitty subtitles
why did they give him this misleading shape
ya the question was bad
i understand what comes after this
but not it exactly
wdym the diameter is equal to the circumference in length
isnt that the whole point of pi that they arent
i did not say that
my bad! please elaborate
i said
the 2 bumpy sides of the rectangular looking shape is just the exterior of the circle
so they have the same length
hence the difference will be the 2 ends of the rectangle looking shape
which has length r on each side, so together it's 2r = diametre = 10
oh my god i thought perimeter meant diameter
but for rectangle
this was all a miscommunication bc english si trash
yes
Closed by @lusty bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You can beat the kid keep going 

isnt this frame from a video , i remember watching this a while ago , like a compedition between a 5 y old chinese? vs older?? 😭
i just scrolled up , im sorry for the ping
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question:
If I have the set A = {1, 2, 3} and I have the relation R = {(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (1, 3)} (hope my notation is correct), does that mean the relation is reflexive? Or is it not reflexive because we have that (1, 3) in there?
It was something that confused me during lecture
reflexive means it contains (a, a) for every a
it doesn't make sense to disallow any other pair to be in the relation. As this forces any reflexive relation to be the identity
Closed by @light egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
brandon
it's an if and only if, so it depends on which direction you do first
if you wanna start with the -> direction, then you assume that phi is an automorphism and prove that G must be abelian and has odd order
you probably only used the fact that phi is a homomorphism for now, so now its porlly time to use the fact that its also an automorphism
what does that mean? What can you infer about phi?
into itself
but thats obvious in this case
the important part is bijective
try using the fact that phi is bijective, to prove that G must have odd order
might be useful to look at some groups of even order and find out why squaring isnt bijective for them
(ping me if u need me)
indeed
or wait
if such element exist, then it's not bijective
but i'd go for contradiction here. Assume it's even, prove that such g exists, get a contradiction (phi is not injective) and conclude it's odd
lagranges theorem is more relevant for the other direction tbh
at least i think so
do you know what order of element is? Do you know that it divides the order of the group?
minimal n
and do you know that order of any element g divides the order of the group G
or that order of any subgroup of G divides order of G itself
oh now thats even better
think about how u could apply it here
and think about how this relates to order of element (how u could rephrase it in terms of orders)
soo...?
yeah, and as you said before, g^2 = e gives you contradiction (bc that means phi(g) = g^2 = e = e^2 = phi(e), which contradicts injectivity)
and so the first dir is done
yep
the fact that its a homomorphism is quite trivial, so the only difficult part is gonna be the bijectivity
good thing is that for functions G -> G for finite G, injectivity = bijectivity = surjectivity, so for the other part you're just gonna have to prove injectivity
well, to start, id try reducing it to something^2 = e, youve already dealt with that once and its generally a bit nicer
(i.e. always look at the Ker to prove a homomorphism is injective)
do you know what a kernel is?
kernel is basically the set of all inputs to a function, which result in e when plugged in
i.e. {x | f(x) = e}
and to prove that a homomorphism is injective, it suffices to prove that the kernel is trivial (i.e only contains e itself)
but if this is all new to you, dw about it
just do this
and once you're done, dig deep in your memory or notes and try to recall the lagrange's theorem. Im fairly sure you already know it, since you know cauchy's theorem.
Lagrange's theorem says either one of the following:
If H is a subgroup of G, then |H| divides |G|
or
If g is in G, then ord(g) divides |G|
to elaborate on why is that: f(g)=f(h) if and only if f(g)f(h)^-1 = e and since f is an homomorphism this is if and only if f(gh^-1)=e <---> gh^-1 in ker(f)
this is usually proved very soon after introducing subgroups
yeah, thats essentially it
since G has odd order x=e
This is the step which uses lagrange's theorem btw. G cant have element of order 2, because then 2 would divide |G|, but 2 cant divide odd number
>>> something
or just > something for one liners
np
yep
you're welcome :)
Closed by @tawdry lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please do not provide complete answers to helpees; and do not use AI generated work as your own to answer other's questions
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
claim
.close
Closed by @distant galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ummm another google sheet formula question welp sorry lol
Option 1 works, but I can't make option 2 to work
for example
works
but if I try sum countif it only reads -1 not 1 cells
Where is this from exactly?
the formula works in excel, but google sheets does not have exactly the same syntax as excel so it doesn't work
@amber gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sqrt(x)(2x^2+3(x-(2x+1)))
I'm not sure how I can simplify the above problem, mostly because the parentheses seems to soft lock me into the things I'm allowed to do to equation.
I've managed to get it down to
sqrt(x)(2x^2+3x - (6x+1)
by distributing the 3 but I dont know where to go from here
!original please
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Just to be sure that you're writing it correctly for us
Xavier 🌺
mmm thers nothing i can do with this here right, I mean maybe distribute a negative 1?
x -2x -1
-x-1
Xavier 🌺
-3x-3
sqrt(x)(2x^2-3x-3)
Yes
I mean you could leave it like it is too
What's your end goal here
simplify the expression
I hate that sentence cuz it's not explicit
I'd call what you have here simplified enough
But sure you could distribute the √x
Closed by @fast bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel like I did something wrong
,rotate
heres the question
can someone explain what i did wrong or how i can get to the right answer
U pulled out dy/dx from (y^2 + 2xy*dy/dx + 4*dy/dx) even though the y^2 part doesnt have dy/dx
@regal topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @regal topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @regal topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys I need some help understanding this
Its asking to evaluate each limit with power rule
So what's the context of power rule, do you know?
You bring down the exponent to the coefficent and if there is one already you multiply them together and subtract one from the exponent
Are you evaluating the limit or tryna find the derivative?
sorry, accidentally hit my keyboard.
Says to evaluate
Just evaluate? Nothing specific?
From the first principle definition of a derivative this limit is equivalent to f'(5) where f(x)=x^(1/3)
That's question 32 no?
yes
Ain't this qn 31
So yea clue here
f prime of x is 1/x^3 right?
denzio321
Power rule:$f(x)=x^n$ $f'(x)=nx^{n-1}$ where n is a constant
denzio321
so f'(x)= 1/3x^-2/3?
What went wrong
@green steeple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is incorrect apparently
you forgor the chain rule
or rather you didn't differentiate x^(1/2) correctly for it
let me try again
derivative of x^(1/2) is not "just 1/2"
Yep
Closed by @north scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
apparently the answer is 17, how to get there
am i tweaking or drawing that equal 18?
or am i geeking
oh nvm
i am
tysm sir
and or mam
.close
Closed by @mint slate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yep
That looks correct to me
Where’s the final answer
I’d suggest doing cos^2 x - sin^2 x identity
Solve the whole thing and lmk if you get stuck again
Not stupid. Just learning.
Chill, not a big deal, happens with all of us
Can i correct one more thing?
yeah
I think its 10cosx
ah
i got the right answer yay
it took me 4 tries to do this question man
thanks
.close
Closed by @final swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
All good
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve the konesinberg bridge therrrom
Theorem
eulers criterion
that there exists an eulerian path <==> exactly 0 or 2 vertices have an odd degree
I think he means how to solve the particular case the Königsberg problem. The euler's criterion is the general theorem to prove to solve it so applying it without reasoning is an act of faith in this case. I suppose he is interested in the proof of the criterion
i believe it comes from handshaking lemma and def of eulerian path
So first thing you have to realise is that you can represent the problem with a graph
The problem is solved if you can find a path on the graph that passes through every edge just once finishing in a distinct or the same vertex
Are you there?
So suppose a general graph and a path on that graph for which that holds. The vertices in the middle can only be connected with an even number of edges (even degree) because when you go into one of them you always go out. This means the only vertices that can have an odd number of edges are the first one and the last one (two vertices of the graph)
A graph is eulerian if and only if it has 0 or 2 vertices with odd degree. (If it has two, every possible path goes from one of such vertices to the other).
Every vertex of the Königsberg has an odd degree, so one cannot find an eulerian path on it
@fathom narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could you post the question as is?
81pi/5 is correct
although, if you use shell method, you dont have to covert everything wrt y
OH youre saying you didnt get 81pi/5
sorry
so, the shell method says that if we rotate about $x=h$, then $$V=2\pi\int_a^b(h-x)f(x)dx$$ for $a<b\le h$
i would use this method instead of washers and chasing y around
Cycadellic
i think we didn't learn this one
hmm
but this is the entire setup to a shell integral
i mean, we can do washers anyways
if i use the shell method is it $$V=2\pi\int_0^1(2-x)(27x^3)dx$$
Ana
yes
also, if you want to stick with washers, your setup is wrong
we subtract 2, not add it
why subtract
so the line we rotate about is moved to 0
if that makes sense
then its just usual washer from there at 0
hence $$V=\pi\int\left(((h-R_0)^2-(h-R_1)^2\right)dx$$
Cycadellic
i see
.reopen
@final swift Has your question been resolved?
i tried both methods but i get a wrong answer for the washer method even tho i should get same answers
this is another question, same type but different numbers
Oh
The setup is correct
The problen is the second step
You say
3-y^(1/3)+1/4 y^(2/3)
when it should be
3-2y^(1/3)+1/4 y^(2/3)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain why this is logically true?
the pr0of is just expanding it
sure is.
that's it.
I mean sure, algebra itself is a logical argument
maybe you want a combinatorial proof ?
sure ig
I meant do you really want that since combinatorial proof can get a bit tricky compare to the algebra one
then no need
still thanks tho
can i find it in youtube>
lol i just proved this problem 1 week ago in math lesson xD
I'm not sure
you should've seen my classmates face
its actually easier
you just need pascal triangle for that
can you please
logically is just pascal triangle
Why u need any reasoning?
have you learnt pascal triangle?
just curious
no
ok then
I have rCn+1
its a triangle of which all the lines depends on the previous one
essentially just the 2 numbers above added together
On the other hand, I divide this into 2 cases
who shd i listen to?
1 that in r elements i choose, there is element a
i think mine is simpler
I'm talking about a proof atm
ok you first then
Yeah but it requires pascal triangle
ping me when you're done
tbh not interested in knowing the reasoning now
anyways thanks and osrry you two
.close
Closed by @turbid pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
that fair
✅
.close
Closed by @turbid pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(1-sqrt(u))(1+sqrt(u)) is not 1-u^2 its 1-u
Closed by @marsh star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, my lecturer give me a method for this exercise but i quite don’t get it. Can anyone help
You got A as
$ \begin{pmatrix}
2020 & 1 & -2020 \
2019 & 2 & -2020 \
2019 & 1 & -2019
\end{pmatrix} $
Βαχτερ10Φρ4γ
and you need to find B according to the hint, can you do that?
indeed
So what will I do next
your teacher also told you B^2 or B^3 = 0
you can try to find what exactly is the B matrix, and what powers of B are all 0
and replace the values in the expression you have to find
Hm how can i find it
just calculate this???
What about B^2 and B^3
now can you do B^2?
notice how all the rows are identical?
that would be helpful for the matrix multiplication
@cursive ridge Has your question been resolved?
So can i minus row to row so that i will get more 0 entries?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you can also notice that the sum of all the row elements (2019 + 1 + (-2020)) is 0
.reopen
✅
Closed by @cursive ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the formula to find the area of a circle is πr², but what do I get if I just use r²? i asked AI but it confused me more
... you get 1/π of the area of the circle
You get the area of the square whose side is r ?
What are you trying to achieve ?
the circle is π times of square?
Yes, the Area of the circle is π times of the Area of the square
You also get the area of that smaller section of the circle, where the arc BC has length 2AB (in other words, angle BAC is 2 radians)
That area and the area of the square from @outer belfry are equal
π is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, how multiplying the square area to π gives the area of circle?
sorry for these stupid questions but i really want to understand it
You can find lots of proofs of that online; not sure anyone can explain it clearly without using a proof
ok thanks
Here's a simple argument for example:
The area of the regular polygon is OA times its perimeter, because each of these triangles have area OA times the side length divided by 2, and there are as many triangles in the polygon as the polygon has sides
As you increase the number of sides, OA approaches the radius of the circumscribed circle, and the perimeter approaches the circumference
So the area is simply the radius times the circumference divided by 2
-> r * 2πr / 2 = πr²
In our local primary school textbooks, they usually have similar "diagram" like these to "explain", non-rigorous of course:
Closed by @candid granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
show steps of solving this binomial theorem problem
Do you see how to set up two equations?
no
Do you know the general formula for the binomial expansion?
\li \ [(a+b)^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}a^{k}b^{n-k}] i.e. for the first you have [(ax^3+b)^{8}=\sum_{k=0}^{8}\binom{8}{k}a^kx^{3k}b^{8-k}]
Kepe
Do you see now what k you are looking at when x^(3k) = x^6?
i dont understand what steps ur taking
Do you agree with the picture I posted?
Just that those equations hold
i do
Alright. Well, now on the right side there is the binomial expansion of the left and we want to see what coefficient $x^6$ has. The right side looks like [(\text{some coefficient}_1) x^0 + (\text{some coefficient}_2) x^3 + (\text{some coefficient}_3) x^6 + \dots][ + (\text{some coefficient}_8) x^{24} ]
Kepe
I.e. we just want to look at that one summand with x^6, right?
And ignore all the rest
So we are looking for (some coefficient_3)
got it
The second sum here represents this addition of all the coefficient * x terms
We just need to find what k we should be looking at
Well, when is x^(3k) = x^6, for what k?
what
what did you do
I wrote out (ax^3 + b)^8 using the formula for binomial expansion
@neat tusk Do you know the binomial expansion?
i do but i dont understand why there's k's now
Can you write it here or send an image? It will be good if you write the binomial expansion of (ax³+b)⁸
i cant write it
you just need to write the first 2 terms and then the last term and use "..." between them
Why?
i just know the formula i dont know how its applied
[this is what the notation with the Sigma (looking like an E) does in a short form; the k's are running from 0 to n, but if you hadn't had it then yes, write it as you know it]
can u write the general formula you know
binomial expansion
@neat tusk We can continue after you send the general binomial expansion formula which looks something like (a+b)ⁿ or (x+a)ⁿ. It should be present in your notes or in your book.
@neat tusk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help checking Q from H/W
Looks correct 
There is a Euler circuit if and only if there are 0 or 2 odd degrees
G1 does not have an Euler circuit, because the degree of vertex E is odd integer and-
what next
0 only
2 allows an euler path but no circuit
what
oh okay
wait whats the diff betwwen path and circuit again?
whether you finish back where you started
and Euler circuit you meet every point only once?
No that's both
okay ty
thing is that if your graph has 2 odd-degree vertices then an euler path must start at one and end at the other
"G does not have an Euler circuit because the degree of at least one of its vertices is odd"
If that's what you meant, then yes
Closed by @wet sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i found alpha = sqrt(2) by putting it in the curve
now im thinking i differentiate the curve twice? but im getting such an annoying expression
and im not able to do anything
unfortunately I don't see another way
😭
,w (2x + 2y * u) + 5(x^2 - y^2 - 1)^4 * (2x - 2y * u) = 0, solve for u
u = y' btw
sigh, I'll just use Symbolab to confirm your 1st derivative
yeah okay if the 1st derivative is still that impossible, hmmm
I think it's a product rule in disguise, yeah
hm?
u didnt put x,y=sqrt(2)
differentiate wrt x?
what will that do
for the second derivative, you can't sub in numbers too early
thats what the que is asking?
you have to algebraically find the 2nd derivative and then sub in
its pretty easy just see x as constant
no i mean we can find y' by putting x,y=sqrt 2..and then differentiate are curve twice and we will get some y' terms which we can then put as the y' we found
apparently it's like this
yeah
is there any better way?
unfortunately, no
this dosent look humanly possible to calculate 😭
esp under time constraints
but i guess my q is clarified
thank u
how is the question asking that 😭
its asking 3y'
y' = dy/dx
why would u differentiate wrt y
and even if we do
why would we treat x as a constant
.close
Closed by @opal pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a,b,c are natural numbers
Suppose that
a²+3b²=2c²
Prove that b is divisible by 9
First I tried doing mod 3
So that
a²≡2c²
Every square number have either 0,1 mod 3
If a²≡1
1≡2
Is wrong
So a,c ≡0 [3]
So I wrote that
a=3k
c=3m
9k²+3b²=18m²
Devide by 3
3k²+b²=9m²
are you guys math majors discussing these
Take mod 3 again i suppose
instead I'd note:
b^2=9m^2-3k^2=3(3m^2-k^2)
So b²≡0
So b≡0 [3]
oh wait I see, okay 
Also work
also small nitpick 18/3=6, not 9
Right
Then again I suppose b=3n
So b²=9n²
Back to this
divide by 3, you have the original equation back
note that that's your equation again, just divide by 3
try contradiction?
$2m^2$
Miyagi
Yeah
K²+3n²=2m²
well you've shown that we can write (a^2+3b^2=2c^2) as (k^2+3n^2=2m^2) after taking out a three factor from all terms
PajamaMamaLlama
Can u show ?
Hmmm
PajamaMamaLlama
Ok
we get from (a^2+3b^2=2c^2) to (a_1^2+3b_1^2=2c_1^2)
PajamaMamaLlama
with (b=3b_1)
PajamaMamaLlama
repeat the same argument as before to get (a_2^2+3b_2^2=2c_2^2)
Ohhh
then it must follow (b=3b_1=3(3b_2))
PajamaMamaLlama
So just take mod 3 again?
PajamaMamaLlama
What happens if you repeat the process indefinitely?
x,y are non-negative integers.
Prove that we can write any non-negative integer as 5x+3y, except for these numbers (1, 2, 4, 7).
You'll get stuck after the second one from looks
You can use the properties of the GCD I think
How
The GCD of any two numbers x, y can be written as ax + by
you've constructed an infinite descent of integers so no natural satisfy the equation, kinda like the sqrt(p) irrationality proof
Yk the proof?
Yes
What is it
I'll link a video if you're interested
Suggest a problem: https://forms.gle/ea7Pw7HcKePGB4my5
Please Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/michaelpennmath?sub_confirmation=1
Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/michael-penn-math
Personal Website: http://www.michael-penn.net
Randolph College Math: http://www.randolphcollege.edu/mathematics/
Randolph College Math and Science on Facebook...
Then wat
I'll take a different approach actually
So it's obvious that 1, 2, 4, 7 are the only numbers under 10 that can't be written as 5x + 3y
We have 8 = 5x1 + 3x1
9 = 5x0 + 3x3
10 = 5x2 + 3x0
Also, if n can be written in that form, then n+3 can too
So by induction, all numbers greater than 8 satisfy the result
Does that make sense
@cosmic lichen Has your question been resolved?
Can u repeat




