#help-4
1 messages · Page 31 of 1
Thanks🎀
@random hull Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @random hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! Why does n turn into 2pi/n in the limit? Thank you!
supposed to be 2pi/n —> 0
typo
and then apply lim x -> 0 sinx / x
Closed by @ashen wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
would you mind giving me some tips for integrals for you seem to be a very open person in math :3?
Saran, this is not the place to ask that - for one this is not an open channel, and for two that's an open-ended question best served in a non-help channel such as #calculus
ah i apologize for that! Will make sure it doesn't repeat again
"it doesn't happen* again" 👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(c) 4p / (q - r), if p=6, q=5, and r=2
do you want to solve for the expression given p,q,r?
yes
what haave you tried
what do you mean
Have u tried to solve it
show us your thought process
yes
Let's look at the expression and explore a wrong way someone might evaluate it, and then understand why it's incorrect.
Given expression:
$$
\frac{4p}{q - r}
$$
Given values:
- $p = 6$
- $q = 5$
- $r = 2$
Step-by-step incorrect thought process:
-
Substitute values incorrectly:
Someone might plug in the values like this:$$
\frac{4 \cdot p}{q} - r
$$❌ Mistake: They inserted the values into the wrong expression by changing the structure. They treated the denominator as just $q$ and subtracted $r$ afterward.
Resulting expression:
$$
\frac{4 \cdot 6}{5} - 2 = \frac{24}{5} - 2 = 4.8 - 2 = 2.8
$$ -
Alternative mistake – wrong order of operations:
Another mistake might be evaluating $q - r$ incorrectly:$$
q - r = 2 - 5 = -3 \quad \text{(wrong order: used r - q)}
$$Then:
$$
\frac{4 \cdot 6}{-3} = \frac{24}{-3} = -8
$$❌ Mistake: Subtracting in the wrong order (r - q instead of q - r).
Correct way:
$$
\frac{4 \cdot 6}{5 - 2} = \frac{24}{3} = 8
$$
So, the correct answer is 8, and the incorrect methods usually come from:
- Misplacing parentheses or rearranging the formula,
- Applying wrong order of subtraction in the denominator,
- Incorrectly applying the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS).
Let me know if you want help with spotting more of these kinds of errors!
You place the values of p q and r in the corresponding places and follow bimdas
Spiritless30
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
so, what have you tried?
Its fine but chatgpt doesnt rly know what you are thinking
wanna be my friend homie
are you going to try it yourself?
yes, that's correct
correct
thank you
4-2=3
you mean 5-2?
yes
@fervent vault Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed by @fervent vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Find the solutions to the equation x^n + y^n = z^n for any integer value of n > 2.

any restrictions on x,y,z?
because uh
In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation an + bn = cn for any integer value of n greater than 2. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 have been known since antiquity to have infinitely many solutions.
The proposition was ...
are x, y, z integers?
"In Fermat's equation, x, y, and z represent positive integers. It's about whole numbers, not fractions or decimals."
so like are x,y,z integers or not
huh this is pretty cool
whats the proof
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
google andrew wiles proof of flt lol
don't troll
.close
Closed by @wraith heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i think imma leave it..way beyond my scope
i thought it would be simple
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @opal pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
200 - 2 * 5 is not zero and 220 - 2 * 15 is also not zero
show the original question
then do this and show the rest of your work
you probably have a mistake earlier
you're leaving out a lot of details so it's impossible to find your error until you show the original question
¯_(ツ)_/¯
need original question
!vol
Helpers are just people volunteering their time to help you. Be polite and patient.
i asked ehre
and here
doesn't seem rude
yes after your insult here
imagine insulting someone and then begging for help afterwards
Closed by @prisma flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i odnt know what im doing wrong
this problem should be straight forward but im not getting the expected answer
basically
you just subtract 0.18 from 54.5
that gives the length of the two sides of the triangle
and the base is 49.6
to find the area, you can use the Hero's formula
this should be it right?
that's the formula i used to calc the area of the triangle
that sounds right to me
yea but my answer is not matching the MC options
Can you show your work
I'm getting A
ok what am i doing worng?
sorry wrong \question
Lol
Rip
i think it's right man
ok i think that was my mistake....ok theres another quesatoin thats tripping me up
similar
Ah
when they say area of the facade, its basically area of traingle + trapezoid right?
minus the area of square
make another square here
Yes
man i will show you later
900 square inches isn't 75 square feet
i am now busy with my physics
1 square foot is 144 square inches
hey guys do you know something about reflection of lights?
Open a different help channel
If you need help
im converting inches to feet right?
there are so many shits maths sorry
You're converting square inches to square ft
ok sorry
square inches?
wait
lets do it one step at a time
is my triangle area correct?
and area of trapezoid?
i hav e some math problems?
so its actually 900 square inches right?
Open a new help channel
Yes
so im actually converting 900 square inches to square feet?
Yes
sorry for everything actually i am totally new here
so to do the conversion?
Mmm np post your question in #help-22 or something
If you have any
Yeah
6.25
If you want to convert square inches to square feet, you need to divide by 12 twice
Yes
If you want to convert that to feet, its 30/12 by 30/12 ft
yeah
(each side length is 30/12 ft)
dude i just wanna know where are you from?
So the area in square ft is (30/12)×(30/12)
how do you remove this guy
remove me quickly guys .
But do you get it
Up to here
i don't know why you guys are so angry?
So the area is (30^2)/(12^2)
i just want to know about yourselves and those maths
Go to #discussion
This isnt the right channel for that
i know
ignore him...he has no life
i have a cancer already
after someday i will leave this world. sorry please forgive me
you are right
how do you block?
Think about it this way
If you have one square foot, its like having a square that with side length 1ft
Which is equivalent to having side length 12 inches
ok
12 inches on each side, so there are 12^2 square inches
Yes
ok i get it i think
lets move on
so then
i just need to subtrct 6.25 from the area of the triangle and trapezoid
Yes
891
Is that one of the answers
Seems like it
do you have time for a few more geo questions?
ive got a test on thurs and need to nail this
I don't but someone else might
try to find the length and width of the centre rectangle 
yea that was my plan
- the area of the top rectangle is given as well as its length so we can find its height (we call this a)
- we can find the height of the bottom rectangle using the same method (we will call this b)
- by taking a and b from the length of the whole object we can get the heigth of the middle rectangle (we will call this C)
- knowing the bottom rectangle is equally split, we assume that 6/3 is equal to the width (we will call this D)
- we find the area of the central rectangle with CxD
- we add the areas of all the rectangles together
oh ok so
to get the height of the the top rect
its A = b x h right?
so its basically written as 28 = 7 x h
tthen we can just solve for h to find the height?
yup
yes
the length and the height are both in cm
so in terms of units we have:
cm x cm = cm ^2
you can also apply this for volume to get its unit too
ok
let me try to work oiut the rest of hte problem
ok
so area of that middle rect is 16cm^2
so total area of that shape is 16 + 8 + 4
28cm
why 8 and 4?
you sure?
read the question again
check the problem text again
yup
good job
amazing
i cant believe im doing it
A 😁
is my visual representation correct?
seems right
@halcyon lintel Has your question been resolved?
thanks
if you're done with this channel, you can .close it 
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello there
so im trying to solve this problem
my initial reaction is to try to solve the missing side of the upper most trapezoid shape
so to get the height of the trapezoid, you just do 113-58-32 = 32mm
h = 32, length_a = 120
wat nevermind.
i think my steps is incorrect
Where is the 115 coming from?
sorry, should be 113
And it’s not -58mm bc the line doesn’t go in the right direction
You have to use pythagoras
but it shows 58mm poiinting to the blue dotted line
isnt that the height
oh wait
i see what you're saying
thats the height of the triangle shape
not the actual height of the diagram
i think thats what you mean
Ye
yea so i first use py. theorem to solve for the height of that triangle
Idk, didn’t know how to say it
ok so first step is to solve the height of that triangle
cool
step 2
this is where im still kinda lost
my first instinct is to solve the missing side on the top trapezoid shape
the line that is parallel to the 120mm
the blue dotted line
Yes and you know the height of the trapezoid
yea
oh ok
so then i can use py.theorem again to solve for that missing triangle base?
Yes
yea makes sense....appreciate it. thanks 🫶
Okay, you could post your result so I could check, if mine is the same
k one sec
thats the height of the trapezoid shape on the top
now to find base of that triangle
That can’t be: 110-80 is not 75
the 75 is just the length of that missing triangle
this one
oh wait
x cant be longer than the hypotenuse
no wait
im confused
But 113-52-32=29, not 75
51,84 is the length of that missing side from that triangle
That’s right
75 is the height of that trapezoid shape on the top
29.16
how tf did i get 75
When is there going to be a math lecture
?
which square?
yea seems to be good
yea i have lots of questions
but i dont want to take anymore of your time
appreciate it. 🫶
Ok, then could you close the channel please?
.close
.close
You have to write it
@golden cloak hey sorry
if you could help with one other question, i just realized i got one of my other quesetions wrong and not sure why
if you cant help its ok but ill post it if anyone can take a look
this was my solution but it appears to be incorrect
@everyone
6th aug,2026
U r a year too early
Go back to sleep
im still here if anyone can help thanks
Procedure seems right
Idk abt the calculation
Calculation seems right too
Why do u think so
im trying to upload a screenshot that shows my answer is incorrect but library wifi is slow af
sorry
np i'll wait
63.98?
that is the closest number to your calculation
doesnt it say to round to nearest dollar
?
find to the nearest dollar
ok i think i get what it means
thanks
.done
That is ur calculation
yea
Yes if u had 64 ,u would be rounding it to integer
It didnt ask for rounding it to an integer form
i guess they wanted to the nearest dollar without going over?...
i dont know
i dont know actually
they just trying to make it confusing for you
all good though
It says rounding it to nearest value as in rounding it to lower decimals i suppose
Alr if done then .close or .solved
.closed
@halcyon lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @halcyon lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to indenify what I'm solving for . Cos,Sin, Tan
Do u have a specific question
sin is opposite/hypotenuse, cos is adjacent/hypotenuse and tan is opposite/adjacent
"If it says how much height did you gain" what is it, is it tan,cos or sin?
"The side opposite to the angle is opposite "
draw it out
it will help
Depends on angle
Ok
youd slip and fall if it was 20° to the vertical
far too steep no
That how?
Draw the figure
Idk how to do that...
^^
Draw a path going upwards
To vertical?
yh defo 20 to the horizontal
But the vertical as in opposite is the height
so tan
Yea
or wait
Yes so put in the angle
ye
I don't have protracter
The moutain is 20° with horizontal
just label it
its not scale
Uh
now solve
Ok
j personal preference ur fine dw lol
you have an angle, and two sides, what are those two sides?
the possibilities: adjacent, opposite, and hypotenuse
not quite, correct that sin is opp/hyp, but you plugged 100 into the opposite, 100m is not on the opposide side of the angle
yes
in SOH
it means
sin = Opposite/hypotenuse
Its 34.2m
yes because you also messed up your algebra
Right?
Sad
technically right
Yes
but try to find your error
the two mistakes cancelling out here was concincide and may not work in general
nah
its sin
because you have the hypotenuse
and are working out the opposite
Ohh wait
mb
I am right?
yes
😁
i got confused
because you labelled the 5m on the hypotenuse
So 5m is vertical?
no
And hypo is opp?
5m is horizontal
no you are trying to work out opposite
you have adjacent and the the angle
Tan
yeah well done
yeah
Yipee
thats the right answer
✅ ✅
Now I can rest in peace
well done vro
@rare sleet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rare sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where are u stuck
the tangent line should be parallel to QP?
where the line just touches the circle?
yea but what does the QP is the tangent to the circle mean?
is that what they mean?
not exactly.
The line QP only touches the circle at Q
draw a line from Q to P, then it's indeed tangent to the circle
and perpendicular to OP
yes thats tangent to the circle.
its actually QO
not QP....my bad
ok
one sec
where is P?
ionly see Q and O
am i supposed to solve for P or something?>
Can you not see P in the picture?
no
i see only Q and O
my eyes are bad
is the point in the middle of the circle supposed to be a P?
I would ask your teachers for a larger print, this sounds like a genuine issue you could have with your education
There are many issues but I won't go into it atm
Ok so the tangent line would be from q to p points?
Yep
Correct
angle QOP is 32.8 deg
Mhm, so draw that on
Yep
Mhm
is this a trig problem?
Yep
so basically, this is whats given
my first instinct is to try to solve for the radius
caues that would give me a second length
of the triangle
and i dont see how the angle given helps me
is angle OQP supposed to be a right angle or something?
honestly, this question is supposed to be strictly related to circles
so im going to assume that i need to use formula for area or circumference of a circle but i dont see how any of these formulas apply to this scenario
This question revolves around you noticing a right angled triangle
so OQP is indeed a 90deg angle?
Yes
As QP is perpendicular to the radius
and we're just supposed to know that?
And we are using the radius as one of the lengths of the triangle
And perpendicular lines are, by definition, at right angles to eachother
this looks so wrong
It's a property you have to memorize
Whenever you connect a radius to a tangent line, it creates a right angle
No need to use the theorem of cosines here
so a tangent line will always have a 90deg angle?
Only if you connect a radius to it
QP^2 = PE * PO
This is another property you have to know
so only the end of the radius that connects to the edge of the circle right?
where it will form the 90deg angle?
What do you mean?
This is actually wrong
never from C to B
You have to extend this to a secant
what?
So this picture that we have
Perhaps, I'm just showing you an easier way
From this. QP^2 = PE * PK
is this a shorcut?
It's a helpful theorem
so line AB in my drawing is not a tangent line?
oh ok but back to my original question
the 90dg will always be from A to B
never from C to B?
This is how the angles are being made
Every time you connect a radius to the tangent line
It creates a 90 degree angle
ohhh ok that makes more sense
yea so its the radius on the edge of the circle that forms the 90deg angle
thanks for clarificatoin
hopefully my finall answer is correct
appreciate it
🫶
It's also helpful to know that if they make a 90 degree angle on 1 line, they are parallel to eachother
It's not drawn correctly, but you get the idea
yea got it....
i was just expecting this answer to be less about trig and more about using circle formulas
but i was wrong
thanks
.closed
@halcyon lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @halcyon lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just checking to see if my homework is good my work is the last image
,w sin(x)=-0.23, 0 \leq x < 2pi
This is fine
,w (180/pi)arctan(1/5)
This is fine to the nearest tenth
,w 4sin(pi/2 * x)=3, 0<x<10
,w 3sin(2w)+5sin(w)=0, 0 \leq w<2pi
,w sin(165 deg)=(sqrt 6-sqrt 2)/4 true or false
Checks out
Changed 2.55 to 2.56 and rounded correctly everything else solid
Thank you for the help!
Was there anything else I missed?
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @royal basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok my adventures into PDEs continue
I want to solve this problem
$u_t + (x^2-1)u_x = 0$ with the boundary condition $u(0, x) = e^{-x^2}$
frosst
following Oliver's intro to pdes book, we find c and 𝛃 accordingly
$c(x) = x^2 - 1$, $\beta = \int \frac{1}{c(x)},dx$
frosst
@pine prairie Has your question been resolved?
oh i forgot about this
do the integration we get $\beta(x) = \frac{1}{2}\ln\left|\frac{x+1}{x-1}\right|=t+k$
frosst
and then im a bit lost
chatgpt says you let $t = 0$ and $x(0) = \xi$ but idk why you'd do that
frosst
Generally, how we approached this sort of thing in engineering was we assumed u(t, x) = T(t) X(x). So du/dx = TX', du/dt = T'X, so we have TX' (x^2 - 1) + T'X = 0. We can isolate. T'/T = (1 - x^2) X'/X. The left hand side is solely a function of t, and the right hand side is solely a function of x, so the only way that these can both be true is if both sides are constant. So T'/T = C, and (1 - x^2) X'/X = C, and we just have two ODEs now.
However, I was never really happy about the first step where we assumed the form of u(t, x) was decomposible like this.
I don’t think that’s right
The solution is $u(t,x) = \exp(-\left(\frac{1+x+(x+1)e^{-2t}}{1+x-(x+1)e^{-2t}}\right)^2)$
does that satisfy the boundary condition? It looks like if t = 0 you get exp(-(x+1)^2), should the numerator have an (x-1)exp(-2t) instead?
frosst
Oh it’s + on the bottom
wouldn't the + on the bottom give you a div by 0?
@pine prairie Has your question been resolved?
Errr let me check
Oh you’re right
I think you get x-1 instead of x+1
It said to do this
Then sub x = xi and t = 0 into here to solve for k in terms of xi
Then plug it back into this equation for an equation of x, t and xi
oliver gives you this
Solve for xi then plug it into f from here
Okay but also the next line in here says this formulation isn’t particularly enlightening
But I also tried to graph this for other examples above and those worked
So I’m not sure what isn’t enlightening about it
I think Oliver is wrong and it is very enlightening
.close
Closed by @pine prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need some help understanding this proof
I understood the first line, basically the big rectangle within [x_(j-1), x_j] is the same as thinner rectangles within summed up, but how does the upper inequality happen?
I made a drawing and it seems to make sense
Closed by @ivory valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
trick is to draw lines trough the center of the circles
@tardy hamlet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tardy hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with the approach
I needed help
helps to know all small primes
with combinatorics
thats the issue
idk how to deal with big primes
there must be some technique or approach I'm unaware of
btw
But when Ill have to reach bigger primes what do I do
worry about that later
its combinations and permutations and as a whole they are called combinatorics
permutations are arrangements
combinatorics include permutations. if you mean combination vs permutation, combination doesn't care about order
ohh
what is combinatorics means though?
the study of combinations and permutations
OHHH
Basically whole things is about arrangements and combinations
parent branch of what exactly
cuz like Trigonometry is litterly combinations of both geometry and algebra but its pretty diff
like number of ways you can pair your sneakers with a cool jacket or stuff
Both Combinations and permutations
yes factorial
i think you might want to open a new help channel for this
there's quite a bit to talk about
yes
Really?
arent the definitions of combinations should be pretty simple
you can talk abt it in general or discussion channel
this channel belongs to brischkl at the moment
That is true, sorry for my rudeness
judging from your curiosity (which is all good!), i sense a lot of questions from you

so best to open a new channel so we can answer your questions without bothering OP
What can a prime number end with ?
they just don't end with even
jwait i'm computing them
@ebon glade I can't solve it
Hmmm what about 1 digit primes
2 ways
can you list all 1 digit primes
2,3,5,7
so what color do those digits need to have
when one of them is blue its 2 ways and when one of neither of them is blue its 3 ways
total 5 ways (probably)
What can we say about the colour of 2
2 ways
1 possible way for 2 then
lets think about 22
it isn't a prime tho
but it is composite
?
You said this earlier
So how many colours can 2 take
it can be red or blue
22 needs to have a digit that is not green
yes
so what color can 2 have
lets think about 33
so 33 can have either red or green too
it can have 5 ways in total
when one of them is blue
I have no clue how you arrived at 5
the digit 3 cant be blue
but also it cant be green
cause its contained in 33
Wait I think you are misinterpreting the question
when you exclude blue you get RG,RR,GG and with one of them blue BG,RG
We don't have to find the ways in which each number can be represented
total 5
all 3s have the same color
We have to find the ways to colour just the digita
will it be so??
you cant have the first 3 be red and the second one be green
No need to count the ways of each number
We need to eliminate possible colours of digits
the digit 3 cant be blue cause 3 is prime and cant have a blue digit
the digit 3 cant be green cause 33 is composite and cant have a green digit
so what color is 3
5 is prime so RG
lets think about 55
It'll be only red
so for which digits do we know the color now
single digits and multiples of 11
do you know what the word digit means
what other digit is also easy
7 I guess?
and we realized along the way that numbers consisting of only one digit are interesting
so what about 11
11 is prime and it's digit is 1 so if we consider 1 as prime we get RG
and it isn't composite
what about 111
111 is divisible by 3 so it's composite and it can have R
so 1 is red
yep
so now we know that all numbers that end in 1,2,3,5,7 are fine
cause no matter whether they are prime or composite, they contain a red digit
yep
what about numbers ending in 4
they are composite so for them it'll be (RB)
so 4 is either red or blue and no matter what, every number ending in 4 is fine
what about 6
same for 6
what digits are left?
we are left with 8 and 9
0?
kk
8,9 are slightly difficult
@halcyon plank Has your question been resolved?
8 is easy
9 seems to be very difficult actually
unless I'm missing something
well I suppose 4,6,8,9 as a combination is very difficult
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
what's your question?
If α and β are the distinct roots of the equation x² - 3¼ x + 3½ = 0, then find the value of α⁹⁶(α¹²-1) + β⁹⁶(β¹²-1) and I did it using Newton's formula and also playing with sum and product of roots but my friend said complex numbers could be used to solve this question but I don't understand how
the descriminant of the quadratic is less than 0
so the roots are on the complex plane
if the two roots are in the complex plane then they are conjugates of each other
That much I know