#help-4
1 messages Ā· Page 26 of 1
Whole question ^
I was thinking of finding the relation between distance , and then just using basic 1d
@dusky pulsar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do a simplex tableau by pivoting?
@midnight pier Has your question been resolved?
Google Gemini 2.5 pro answer to get you started
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
Why chatgpt and ai cant solve math
Well well well
Gemini is always my first ask. It's really smart at math actually.
though it is occasionally wrong
Depends on the level
Of analysis
Needed


stop spamming OP's channel
@charred sinew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get the 2nd value of r
@ornate sequoia Has your question been resolved?
two points:
- you are intended to do this problem by hand, not with a calculator
- your use of the calculator is not correct. r = 21 is not a correct value of r, neither are p = 6, q = 1 valid values of p and q
expand (px + 3)(qx + 4) and compare coefficients to 12x^2 + rx + 12
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im back
ok for this you need a horrible trick
do you know ptolemy's theorem? it makes the question very easy if you do
ummm
can't we just use pythagorus twice
?
I assume that you can use trigonometry, right?
ok now im curious lol
ye,wat do we get
D is used already by the way : )
lol
me being an idiot lol
ye
why are they congruent
SAS
I am curious about how you checked that the angles are equal. It took me some time to realize that
carbonized you are a genius
u play obe?
i am not
yeahh
top 5% in TSA is nothing impressive
first time someone commented on it and identified it correctly lmaoo
clarinet
n o
uh top 5% here means u know how to add
ok let's get back to the problem
k
and?
idk how to explain rlly
but you get my idea
ye
now there's one more pair of sides that are equal
hmm
hint:
AC BE?
CE mb
8
alr so you can get AC now
4root(2)
Closed by @fleet stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
if i see this sort of problem i'd def use Ptolemy
yeah
i think i may have started a war in the discussion because of my bio lmao
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The circumference of each circle is pix^2 + pi4x^2 + pi16x^2
if we call the radius of A to be 'x' then B has a radius of '2x' and C has '4x'
circumfernce is 2pi * radius
That's the area, not the circumference
Closed by @winter wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know how the calculation works to get a answer? I didnāt pay attention now Iām cooked
(Algebra 2, Logarithim)
@foggy thistle Has your question been resolved?
Are you referring to the calculation of logarithm?
think about where 0 should go
Closed by @foggy thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am currently smooth brain, is the matrix
[0 1
1 0]
invertible or no
things in my head:
there is a pivot in every row and column
thus, it is invertible
does this logic work or no
what is a condition that the matrix is invertible

wait- so while im here, when can I use the diagonal to find the determinant of a matrix
when a matrix is upper (or lower) triangular, its determinant is the product of the diagonal entries 
Closed by @languid copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i can help if u want
uhh yeah basically i'm not that familiar with functional equations (like i know the basics of substituting "nice" values and stuff but the f(30)=1 is kinda throwing me off ngl
that would be great thanks
you want result or how to do it?
how to do it
alr
like im trying to learn as much as i can š
Sure okay uhh lemme look at the screen shot
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
:p
is this solved
not yet :p
er whats ur progress
so i think the reason im finding it tricky is because
its not like a typical functional equation
like the conditions are kinda weird lmao and so im not really sure how to make progress
:p me too
f(30)=1 seems to be the starting point to use the first condition
like f(30)=f(30)f(1)=f(15)f(2)=f(10)f(3)=f(6)f(5)=1 implies f(x)=1 for x=1,2,3,5,6,10,15,30
Yeah that makes sense
and yeah f(stuff ending with 7)=1
f(10k+7)=1 k\inZ+?
yeah pretty much
skul skul
this question is cooked lmao
So I think you could do something with prime numbers here
mk
Think about how integers are built out of prime numbers
oh so like instead of factoring you kinda build out?
so like f(10k+7)f(x)=f(x) kinda thing and if
yea
and the rest of the question is proof by contradiction
There's a way to do this by looking at last digits of numbers instead.
assume that f(y)=n not equal to 1
e
then theres probably some factorisation argument or smth with primes or idk
wait this is helpful
alr i'll see if i can take if from here
:p
thanks for the help!!
emm
@sick sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this the right channel tho?
wiat what channel is this
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #āhow-to-get-help for instructions).
U want checking?
Sure
Bottom no. 1
And 2
For the table, arenāt there 10 eqs
No 7 seems problematic (table)
@midnight pier Has your question been resolved?
I asked her what it's supposed to say
?
?
Check how u solve the ineuqality
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wha
?????
@midnight pier Has your question been resolved?
k
@midnight pier Has your question been resolved?
i JUST USE dESMOS
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me slve this question?
What did you try? Can you show your work?
i dont have my phone w me rn, but i was able to simplify down to integral tan theta
but chatgpt shows the limits changing, which is why im confused
like after i asked for help
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
By the way, why are you confused about change of bounds? Isn't it the standard process when doing substitution?
yeahh so would it be lower and upper 0 and pi/6 respectively?
fr though gpt's not that great at math
Yep correct
@heady egret Has your question been resolved?
Guys is it fine if I ask 10th grade physics?
in another channel, please
Okey
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If x = 1 - ā2,find (x - 1/2)³. How do you solve this?
just plug in and compute
@half arch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it true or false?
What is meant by rational function?
rational function is continuous
if P and Q are polynomials, a rational function would be P/Q
what do u think
true
why true
bcz it is continous
right
Closed by @sage kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Not true like if the denominator has a root it isnāt continuous
It being continuous is equivalent though, so thatās circular reasoning

composition of continuous functions make it continuous tho
You mean quotient?
This isnāt composition and the inverse function is not continuous
Yeah, thatās a more insightful answer
I am not saying you are wrong
my wording hasnt always been the best. i understand 
Itās okay
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A circular loop of wire with a radius of 0.1m lies on a uniform magnetic field that's perpendicular to the plane of the circular loop. The magnetic field changes uniformly from 0.3T to 1.2T in half a second.
What is the magnitude of the induced emf in the loop?
how do i set up an equation for this
faraday's law of induction
[ \varepsilon = -\frac{\Delta \phi}{\Delta t}]
Note ${\phi = A \cdot B}$ in this instance
k
Closed by @turbid wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(for those reading after, no, this is not a dot product. it is the product of the magnetic field strength and the area of the circle)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
have you drawn a diagram
can't send an image as I'm currently not operating my phone
wait I'll scrap this and solve it later
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Let m, n be natural numbers such that m + 3n - 5 = 2LCM(m, n) - 11GCD(m, n). Find the maximum possible value of m + n.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not really sure where ive gone wrong here
can someone help
i just used the jacobian to transform the integral
into the form in the image
then i tried integrating it and just ended up with zero
hello mr chomper
jacobian is correct
r dr dtheta dz
x^2 + y^2 <= z^2 => r^2 <= z^2 becomes a cone
are u sure abt the bounds for r?
hmm
lemme think for a sec
is it between -sqrt(x^2+y^2) and + sqrt(x^2+y^2)?
but then again ig thats just -+z
think aboout the diagram
ah wait no it is this right?
because its <= z
so its included everywhere within the cone
as a function of (x,y)
im not following
r^2 = x^2 + y ^2
yup
so r = +-sqrt(x^2 + y^2) ?
oh but z is >= 0
so r is between 0 and sqrt(x^2+y^2) ?
r is between 0 and z
oh ig that is fine then as this is just equal to 0 and z ?
i think i was just overcomplicating it
[ \int_0^1 \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^z]
k
this yes
yh alr thanks
that makes sense
ill try finish the rest of the integration
also is there any easy way to check answers to these using wolfram alpha or smth
dont ur book have an answer key
oh yh acc i can just use that
that would be easier probably...
uhh ok so ive done the integration
but im p sure ive done smth wrong
as im getting 8pi ( ln(1) - ln(0))
in the end
should get -5pi/9
thats the correct answer
,w int from 0 to 1 int from 0 to 2pi int 0 to z ln(r^2) r dr dtheta dz
wa the goat
ln(0)?
yh š
u did smth wrong defnly
okie
ignore the bounds -z and +z in the top line
wait ive just clocked
i mustve messed up the first integration step
bc theres also another ln(0) error before
${u := r^2}$?
k
oh yh ima dummy
how did u do u:= ln(r^2) sub
theres no 2/r
oh my gosh
in the integrand
theres only r
yh idk why i did u = ln(r^2) š
so use this 
yh yh
im assuming the rest works out nicely
is there any point in me doing the rest?
wdym
not sure, havent thought abt the rest yet
its just pluggin in bounds right
i just wa'ed it
ill do it anyways quickly then
plugging in bounds + trivial integration
okie
@glass kelp thanks for the help, i should be good now!
š
.close
Closed by @graceful merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
addition is repeated successor functions
multiplication is repeated addition
exponents are repeated multiplication
following this pattern we next get tetration, pentation, sex?tation, and so on
what if anything comes before successor functions in this pattern
hyperoperations i think is the general name for these
or knuth arrow notation
oh yea guys
im trying to create my own axioms based off Peano's
i successfully defined addition and subtraction
but not multiplication and division and stuffs
off topic
#math-discussion or open your own channel
...
...
alr now close...
don't hog somebody else's channel.
Plz no get too hyped
if you keep insisting you might get somebody calling the mods at you
Why should something come before successor?
Hey I'm getting the answer as I=-(5pi)/9
all the hyperoperations you mentioned take in 2 inputs, except for successor
i cant even imagine how that would work
it's called the successor. something has to come before it
you mean to say hyperoperations in the negative field
uhh.. in the negative field?
What is that supposed to mean
wait I kinda get the pattern, so if we were to extend the hyperoperation hierarchy downward, it would be:
H(-1,a,b) = b --> the identity function - no change basically
holy crap i left for 15 minutes and ppl are all over this
That's the fun part of Maths, a topic can be spoken on and on about and it can never end
λx.x is my only real hypothesis
although lambda calculus is not necessarily the best thing to communicate with
it's like asking if you can finish a game in negative hours and not just 1 or 2
i dont know what that is but this sounds very lambda
its fine @viral idol you can blab
the pattern implies its existence
it's like an expansion of the peano's axioms
probably move to #discussion
How can unary operation be repeated anything
well ish
ish
bSUCC(a) doesnt equal (b)(SUCC(a))
it equals a+b
which is kinda sirta ish how itd go but idkkk
what
bSUCC(a) doesnt even seem like a well formed expression
at least to me
b and SUCC(a) are both terms
what operation combines those 2 terms
yea but this is the fabric of math
negative time is abt as validly real as white holes ig idk
unary?
oh like one input?
yes
exactly
bSUCCa
i just said that
its the successor of succA
SUCC is a unary function?
and in this case it's applied on a
so its essentially b(a+1)
what's meant by that
whatever
bsucca is binary
succa aint
ANYWAY
thats not the point
i have never seen a notation where bSUCCa is to be interpreted as a + b
no
oh okay
so you just made SUCC a binary function with a dummy variable b which does nothing
so it's only essentially unary
its weird
(b)(SUCC(a)) IS NOT bSUCCa
its dumb
so bSUCCa = a + 1?
who said its like that?
i dont fucking know
the internet because math is an autistic obsession of mine
then it seems like you misinterpreted some of the notation (or you read some terrible notation online and you should read better books)
i knew the peano's axioms because someone posted a video about > 300 page proof of 1+1=2
š
imo it should be expressed with a pre-exponent thing
like cubed roots or tetration
so a+b = ^b SUCC(a)
but its not expressed like that sadly
a + b should just be expressed as a + b
i dont see anything wrong with the symbol +
about my axioms, it didn't go really well
if we want a notation uniting all these so-called "hyperoperations", then we might use $H_n(a, b)$ or sth
MathIsAlwaysRight
i know lambda calc bc whatever his name is made a video titled what is plus times plus
o h
ill say it in #serious-discussion
im not arguing against +
lololol
math discord is for autistic ppl who get frustrated with eachother for asking for help in the area for asking for help
lol
Well, i dont get what you're expecting
why should all patterns be extendable in both directions?
you get a gold sticker
why cant you have a starting point somewhere
In mathematics, the hyperoperation sequence is an infinite sequence of arithmetic operations (called hyperoperations in this context) that starts with a unary operation (the successor function with n = 0). The sequence continues with the binary operations of addition (n = 1), multiplication (n = 2), and exponentiation (n = 3).
After that, the se...
why do negative numbers exist
what number is successor in the pattern?
do we know for sure its 1?
best you can do is check some defns here and try to see what happens when you plug in e.g. n = -1
...............
does this have an equation for that
-
negative numbers exist because someone found them handy and interesting enough to define them
-
in what pattern?
it has a recursive definition
which includes an equation
hand through head soyjack
- pure mathematics/logic doesnt care what we can percieve, nor what can exist in this universe
- the pattern of succ + x ^ ^^
if you mean the succ, +, *, ^, tetration, pentation, ... pattern, then the generalization upward is pretty obvious and follows the recursive rule above
notice that $H_n(a, b) = H_{n-1}(a, H_n(a, b-1))$ essentially captures the "repeated operation" part of these hyperoperations
MathIsAlwaysRight
MathIsAlwaysRight
MathIsAlwaysRight
or simply $H_{-1} = H_{0}$
MathIsAlwaysRight
not very interesting
yea i know
i csnt read that yet
we have successfully proven that unsucc = succ
lol
tf this mean
is
is H0 succ
yes
H0 is succ, H1 is addition, H2 is multiplication...
every time i hear succ i think of that weird filthy frank video with the alien saying give me the succ
well i cant check if thats right bc i cant read it yet
but that is a dissapointing answer
also one i dont like
repeated H^-1 cant be itself when its SUCC bc repeated SUCC is +
that
seems to be broken
OR
in the sense of lambda bc we are menipulating and disecring functions....
MAYBE
its the same function
but a different number or order of INPUTS
i have not seen it
succ is funny and sounds derogatory in my head tho lol
damn you had an acc for 6 years and have no pfp
tf
sometimes i'm indecisive
right like
ok
in lambda calc
0 = the false function
which is just
if we put in a, then b, we will get b back
its useless by itself
but 0 becomes a very different thing when we change its application
the problem is that SUCC is a unitary operation, and unlike addition and higher operations, it doesn't take two numbers as input, where the second one is the number of times to repeat the previous operation
looks like this lol
ā¬ā¬ā¬
ā¬ā¬ā¬
ā¬ā¬ā¬
ā¬ā¬
so if you were to hypothetically define H_{-1}, you would have no way of indicating how many times you can repeat it in the definition of H_0 = SUCC
yea ik that
well yea
thats what i didnt get
thats why i asked
its hard to go backwards in the order
There is not much else to get. Now we know that we cant really meaningfully extend it backwards
so we move on
i think it might be possible to force it to work anyways
and do sth else
H{-1}
naw
another more handwavy reason is that there's quite literally nothing between the number n and the number SUCC(n) when hou work within the naturals
it's a bit of yippy yappy
so if you really insist, you should try and look into is not working within just the naturals
then like how did this happen
did MAR miscalculate this
bc now we have this dilema
but the successor function isn't particularly special
#latex-testing has it
they didn't
it is to me a little
its dumb and insignificant
but extremely relivant and rarely taught
sorry i mistyped
i cannot check thooo
i meant outside of naturals it isnt special
within the naturals it is special indeed
wym natruals
i mean it almost took down discord's limit
$\bN_0$
artemetra
non-negative whole numbers
in our country
yea
$\mathbb N$ are natural numbers from 0 and so on
don't even start
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
$\mathbb N^*$ are natural numbers from 1 and so on
how does everyone know how to use the bot
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
WE USE N*
practice and that's it, it's not super hard
oh yea #latex-testing has it
you find what each character is called and you use it
weird
oh you have a github
interesting
indeed i do
bro messed with polynomials in one python file š
H{-1} cannot equate to H{0} thats not right that doesnt work
maybe that's the contradiction you were seeking all along?
i thought that's the best suitable channel that no one's messing around
bro's actually stalking
but yeah that code is old as hell
if H{-1} = repeated H{0}
and repeated H0 is H1, so on and so forth, addition equals multiplication
which is wrong
uhm move to dm
iirc it has a bug in long division lol
sure
so maybe the assumption that H_-1 exists is false?
lol
well maybe
but again
i dont know how to do this shit
which is why im here
what the hell is # latex testing
well i am confirming that the idea of H_-1 isn't very well defined
at least with the way H_n is defined
i need to make a labda calc block for tetration
maybe thatl be the project for the next few days
and i believe you
i made the peano axioms simulator in golang
i just dont know what conclusion to come to yet
oh it's slow as hell
I'm sure there's some alternative system where it makes sense
but definitely not like the usual succ + * ^
i am by no means an expert in that tho
im half thinking of this in lambda
and idk if you know what that is actually
but i think itd make a ton of sense for it to work and also not work/exist in lambda
yea
i know what lambda calculus is
can you do lambda calc
a little bit
can you read/decipher/convert john tromp diagrams
this is λx.x in the john tromp crap
which is [false,0]
except as ive found (unless im doing it wrong) the 0 doesnt work completely as 0
that no
its λx.λy.y
i said it wrong
don't apologise lol
its really weird shit
and raw logic is helpful here and almost needed to do this
although i do find it weird
this uh
ok
in order of how complicated the functions are (ammount of details most to least)
it goes like
addition, successor, multiplication, exponent
im rather certain
tetrations GOTTA be smaller than + and biggerr than ^ tho
im tired as crap tho
so ill likely figure that out tomorrow or at least try
i know a little abt how it should be structured
@timber echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @timber echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with d). Feel free to speak out if I made a mistake on a previous question too but rn Iām struggling with d)
g is the derivative of f
yes
so f''(x) is g'(x)
In my head i was thinking that it would be when the graph of g crosses the x axis, however im not sure when exactly that would be
how do we find point of inflection
when the slope changing from increases to decreasing so in this case when g crosses the x axis?
or vise versa
g stays at y=0 from -1<x<0, how would i go about that
does it change from increasing to decreasing or vice versa?
it would be decreasing to increasing
so when it wants to know the x-coord of the point of inflection, its any point on that interval -1<x<0?
no
so is any point in this interval a point of inflection
so from the graph wheres the point of inflection
hmm. that seems really weird..
lemme refresh my brain rq
we are looking at f''
which is g' not g
@plucky grotto
fucking hell, im high
wait
so would it just be when g changes from increasing->decreasing or dec->inc
that just clicked
went from 2 to 0
but never went decreasing
yeah i suppose, not until x=3 but im assuming it must go directly to decreasing after x>1
what
oh ye
for it to be point of inflection, yes
i did some searching
its the uhh
ap calc ab 2018 frq #3
u can go check that out in case i am blurry
and my answers wrong
Closed by @plucky grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if E is a vector bundle of rank k over a fixed space M, must every vector bundle over M be of rank k? 
my assumption is no, but I'm really not sure
okay, it's indeed no
we can take the Whitney sum of E with itself
.close
Closed by @next vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
13th one
u sub first?
${u := \frac{1}{x} \implies \dd u = -\frac{1}{x^2} \dd x}$
@timber swan
k

then u do conjugate and stuff

? 
What will this sub do
reduce to the thing to radical only
will become
[ \int \sqrt{\frac{1-u}{1+u} } \dd u ]
k

.close
Closed by @timber swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Folded under exam pressure
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys..m new here
Hi
Welcome
#discussion for discussion
#math-discussion for math discussion
If u wanna ask, a problem feel free to drop it here
@modest anvil do you have a question to ask right now? if not, then you should type .close here. @glass kelp outlined channel usage above
@modest anvil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@obsidian ginkgo Have you drawn the FBDs?
Typical jee studs
do you have progress so far? y/n
yes but cant solve pls provide me the solution there is no solution for this question
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
so help me
well can you show me the FBDs
yes let me send
4.0 m/s²
!nosols also don't blurt out answers anyway
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
,rotate
you're not confident on the direction of friction?
in both the fbd
also in the question cofficient of friction is given so there should be two f max right
and my friction direction right
Yeah just assume that for simplicity
You also don't need to worry about the direction of friction
Since when you solve the equations the sign will tell you
$$F - (2T + f_1) = m_1a$$
$$f_2 - T = m_2a$$
maison
yes just in eq two its + T
okay that should be fine then
maybe you made a mistake in your calculations
nup
Okay let's do it then
$$93 - (2T + 0.2 \cdot 2 \cdot 10) = 2a$$
$$0.2 \cdot 6 \cdot 10 - T = 6a$$
maison
did I get any of the values wrong
Ohhh wait
I made a mistake
The acceleration won't be the same because of the pulley
It will be 1/2
why
maison
nup i dont know this
our eq s are same but only in second eq its +T
WHAT SHOULD I DO
there should be something like this in that module

@obsidian ginkgo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
nup
ask it again
when the bot asks has your question been resolved you need to click ā
@obsidian ginkgo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need help with 51 b. I dont know how to include the transformation on the x axis in the new equation
I know how to include the translation of y-axis which is just adding how many it went up by from f(x) i just dont knwo how to do the horizontal translations
for every x in f(x) put x-a
-> f(x-a) = (x-a)^3 - 3(x-a)²
it shifts a to the right
Closed by @limber sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could I be walked through this problem?
The sqrt(36-36sin^2) one?
Well that where I ended up from the very top integral using trig sub.
One might start by factoring out the 36
It has now been factored out. Look like Pythagorean Identity = cos^2x.
Indeed
So once we use this, we get...?
Seems we've dropped the square root somewhere
Well Cos over Sin is Cot, but the square root...maybe not the right track
You're on the right track
How might we easily simplify the square root
Turn into exponent then distribute across the two terms?
Buzzing Hornet
oh
So, simplifying this gets us?
Integral 6 CotxCosx dx
Right
But looking at this as cot is actually not quite as nice
Do you notice anything if you write it in terms of sin and cos instead
well if we go back a step, then I suppose we could multiply the two Cos terms together, then use the pythagorean identity.
Right, do you see why that's going to be nicer?
Well, It would allow cancelation.
integral 6 - 6sinx dx
yee one moment
Well there's actually not much to show, I thought the 36/6 = 6. And Sin^2 x / Sin X would reduce to Just Sin X.
As the saying goes, algebra is the hardest part of calc
Though uh I have no idea why those are 36s instead of 6s
We were good up here
the more you look at it the more you find lol
So as you've observed this is $\int \frac{6(1-\sin^2(x))}{\sin(x)}dx$
Buzzing Hornet
Now we can pull the 6 out of the integral to disregard it for now
Is 6cos x time 6 cos x not 36 cos^2 x?
This expression is correct
And it expands to this
Which you've (sort of?) observed
Oh ok sorry I see
I thought we had cancelled those 6s
Ok I will point out that everything is simpler if we realize that 6/6=1 and that we can pull the remaining 6 out of the integral
Which gets us $6\int \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{\sin \theta}d\theta$
Buzzing Hornet
yah
Ok so do you get how we got here
Right
then cancel a sin x?
So then the expression inside the integral is $\frac{1-\sin ^2\theta}{\sin\theta}$
Buzzing Hornet
Now, remember that $\frac{a+b}{c}=\frac{a}{c}+\frac{b}{c}$
Buzzing Hornet
So how do we simplify?
Well, 1/sinx is Csc. And Sin^2 x / Sin x = Sin x.
6 integral Csc x - Sin x dx
Well for Csc x I'm not sure.
Hmm I was thinking you'd have this off of the top of your head
I can walk you through that if you'd like
But are you sure this isn't in your book already?
I'm learning all of this litterally just last week. From dereivatives.
I would like that.
Alright so I'm not really sure how to socratic method this one since it's not an easy trick to see
So I'll outline some steps and have you fill in the details
yee
We start with $\int \csc xdx$
Buzzing Hornet
The key insight is that we can multiply by 1 to get $\int \csc x \left(\frac{\csc x-\cot x}{\csc x-\cot x}\right)dx$
Buzzing Hornet
well it would distribute in then reduce to Csc x - Csc x / 1 - 1?
I'm not very goood at algebra.
Def gotta work on that.
Uhh ok so we have an expression which looks like $a\left(\frac{b+c}{d+e}\right)$
Buzzing Hornet
When we multiply this out using the distributive rule, what do we get?
Well the top would be ab + ac
d + e
Right
you would be multiplying by 1 because a / 1.
So going back to this, what happens when we multiply this out?
Well, Csc^2 x - Cot x Csc x / Csc x - Cot X
Right
But the terms on the bottom make me want to reduce.
Mm you'll want to resist that instinct
Do you have a guess at what integral technique we might apply here
Pythagorean I guess
Well this is difficult so it's fine that you don't see it
We're going to use u sub
Specifically, we'll use $u= \csc x -\cot x$
Buzzing Hornet
Do you think that you can work out the rest of the u sub?
Perfectly done
So now, how do we finish up?
Though I guess we should be using theta instead of x
I didn't distribute properly.
Mhm