#help-4
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
Interesting
ABSOLUTELY
How much did it cost you?
.close
Closed by @inner mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
A similar thing happened to me on an exam, it was infuriating because I think it cost me the perfect score
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ello
exponential => a^x
linear => ax
linear is like
exponential is R = 4^t
yes
Hi
hi crystal
both linear and exponential where a is positive increase as t increases
so the argument isnt the clearest
But our question is exponential
Oh no I don't have any idea about English maths. I study in my language. I've to learn English
the nature in which they increase is different for each
are there other choices
other than a and b
aight
factor as in multiplied factor
Aha
4, 4 * 4 = 16, 4 * 4 * 4 = 64, ...
any jee aspirants here
if someone messes with professor k ima mess with him
cool ig
Them*
k
What does
Percent mean
In math
like
15% of 120
Is it like
15/100*120
Or how exactly
per cent is from 'per centum' meaning 'out of 100' in whatever language
Mhm
so its like
of means *?
if the thing is divided into 100 pieces
u take x% from it
say i want 10% of 1000 bananas
10/100
mhm
10/100 * 1000 = 100
love u k
its like saying if 1000 bananas is divided into 100 groups (each containing 10 bananas). if i pick up 10 groups, i will therefore have 100 bananas
read the graph
Closed by @merry geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this saying its wrong
x^5/2
What does the power rule say?
Closed by @whole plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is 3!^sqrt((((phi!)!)!)) irrational?
I called this my number
by ! you mean the gamma function of phi, the golden ratio?
Surprisingly my number ± 0.1 is rational
gl proving irrationality or rationality
you know
e + π hasnt been proved irrational yet iirc
we dont even know that pi^pi^pi^pi isnt an integer
Is it the gamma function?
you cant just do a factorial of a non natural number
I was thinking, since it has phi in it, it has to be irrational
dosent necessary work like that
are you familiar with the gamma function
(an extension of the factorial function)
what do you mean by this
- 0.1 is 172913923/24839361 and - 0.1 is 410991793/60786029
so you're saying there exists a rational less than 0.1 away from your number in either direction
do i understand your claim correctly? y/n
are these just numbers your calculator spit out?
that doesnt mean shit
calculators have limited precision
yes
all numbers in a calculator are rational numbers
I used Wolfram Alpha
ok then in that case
the same claim is true of literally any real number.
you need the gamma function
thats one possible way to generalize the factorial to non natural numbers
anyway, I dont know what you did to WA so that it spit out a rational number for you, but you probably messed up somewhere
just checking, you mean this
$3!^{\sqrt{((\varphi!)!)!}}$
Element118
well, firstly we can simplify 3! to 6, that's obvious
yeah
so the question is whether there are integers $a,b$ where
$\sqrt{((\varphi!)!)!}=\log_6(a/b)$
Element118
Wolfram Alpha says it is unknown.
pulling away the square root is probably pretty hard
how?
hello and welcome to the server
if you want to just chat, go to #discussion or #chill
#book-recommendations also exists
OK thanks
one would have to deal with a product of logarithms, there's not many identities about that
oh
and then getting all the way into phi would be another issue too
factorials are pretty much only known to be nice on integers
maybe factorial of a rational has a closed form
$79445709/81494272 + 1/10 = {\sqrt{((\varphi!)!)!}}?$
F
unlikely
probably easy to prove that is wrong with sufficiently precise calculations
Wolfram Alpha said that ${\sqrt{((\varphi!)!)!}} - 0.1$ isn't irrational
F
it could be a coincidence that it happen.
the way it tries to detect rational numbers is probably by continued fraction
I dont know what you messed up, but WA does not say that
did you compute the first part first, then take the result of that, copy paste it in and subtract 0.1?
oh it isn't lol
The Gamma function turning irrational numbers into rational ones would be such a breakthrough
idk what for but still
well given that its continuous, very likely happens from time to time
the second alternate form is scary
but for specific irrationals probably not
It's only rewriting the gamma form as a factorial, using the definition of phi = 1/2 (1 + sqrt(5) )
ok
Ugly though it is, that is precisely what's being computed
a natural number to the power of an unknown can be irrational.
also a natural number to the power of an irrational is irrational.
like the Gelfond-Schneider Constant.
sometimes it's rational
example?
$3^{\log_32}$
Element118
hmm.
anyway if you want, I can probably show you what you need to learn in order to prove that this is false
ok.
so firstly, you would probably need to know some programming language
Python should be enough if you already have that
assuming you have that, the next step is learning how to compute gamma of an input to an arbitrary precision
I used Python before. But I don't remember how to make a file on IDLE.
um....
oh, got it
so what do I do?
kinda the difficult research step
here's a list of options, you'll have to read through to see which meets your needs
which likely, you would want to find an implementation that can hit thousands or millions of decimal digits
and you'll have to implement that yourself in the programming language of your choice
also you need an algorithm to calculate phi, Babylonian method for square roots should be enough
that's C++
Python is probably a good idea because you can use the big integer or decimal library
C++ should be also fine if you are familiar enough with it
WA computes to arbitrary precision. just click on "more digits" until it doesnt fit anymore
shouldnt take more than once or twice
time to boot up Unity
no floating points so no mes
and so far, with all the steps I outlined here, you should be able to formulate a pretty convincing demonstration of two numbers being different
the fine print to make it a proof that the two numbers are different is to do the numerical analysis to bound your errors for all the computation
how am I going to write the code for it.
I'm looking at this.
if you prefer proofreading code, you can get an LLM to help you write
but you'll be stuck proofreading code so, take your pick what you want to do
I don't want to write the code because it will take a long time.
but I don't want to use an LLM to code it for me because of errors
yeah, it might not be a problem worth it to tackle with limited time
well I sometimes I have java homework because I am taking summer classes (yes I do it online)
maybe I should close this?
.close
Closed by @little pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
there the pin msg by bot
Can you help me solve the problem?
So they are asking q for the largest r?
yes
you can bruteforce this with some code
but i don't think that's the intended solution
that's solvable for an ioqm problem 😭
It's a maths olympiad question, I don't think they allow computers in there
r = 100p + q and then some divisibility/gcd stuff
you need to rewrite 100p + q into a form that involves (p + q), i believe
Yeah thought the same
actually how far are you in, OP?
p+q can either be 33 or 99 I think
but first how much does OP know
Ye
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
I dont know where to begin
write r in terms of p and q
ive tried using chatgpt
its giving wrong answers
and i also tried to solve it myself but couldn't
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
What is the answer it's giving?
that's why i'm giving you steps to try
I can directly tell you answer because Ik what the answer is
the answer is 13 but chatgpt is telling 60
13
then do you know why it's 13?
not much point knowing the answer but not how to get there
Huh?
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
well i mean noans is kinda pointless here because you have the answers, but you're looking for the steps and i would like you to work it out yourself with prompts from us
and btw, you can write latex with texit
but i told you how to?
How did you approach the problem at first?
yeah maybe let's hear your initial approach
what i did is fro mknown given i found out that r=100p+q
and from there
I used modular arithmetic
Can you specify what you did?
and took 100p+q/p=q and tried to input values from 99< and then i didnt know what to do further
yea thats what i told i couldn't find what to do further
then you probably should have said you got r = 100p + q
yea i said the same
i didn't see any hint of you saying you got there
cuz you replied to me saying you used gpt
but anyway
^
ye i asked that half an hour ago sir hahah
im telling you my approach
nvm, forget it
this is your next step here
so i write r-99=p+q
don't think that form is exactly right
Idk its an ioqm problem
i'll give you a hint
Yes we can see
so according to it seems to be right
you need a 100q to show up somehow
so that you can factor 100p + 100q
you need to get a 100q from the 1q that you have
but wouldn't that create a loophole
no
Are you in 9th or 10th rn? Just asking
move the 99q over, but don't simplify the 99q with the 100q
I'm in 11th preparing for ioqm
then i factorize?
correct
Yes
Nah no prodigy
Yes
what do you think you will get?
because i dont thhink that will change any thing
write down the current form of r first
ok wait don't go
you can assume anything you want after writing it down
100(p+q)-99q
there we go
now, you said this won't change anything
i'll tell you what this changes
r = 100(p+q) - 99q
we know p + q must divide r
p+q obviously divides 100(p+q)
agreed?
yes
oh yes
so we know p+q must be a factor of 99
but before we consider which factors
let's consider the range of values of p+q
or rather, p and q separately
p and q are 2-digit numbers
so they are at least 10 and at most 99
??? I don't get this
p+q does not share any factors with q
because p and q are coprime
so for p+q to divide 99q, p+q must divide 99 if it cannot divide q
aight back to the issue at hand
.
we know that the minimum value of p+q must be 11+12 = 23
yes
p and q cannot be 10 because neither ends in 0
and if p = 11, q cannot be 11 because of relative coprimeness
so what are the factors of 99 that are greater than 23?
33
and?
good
so we need to consider p+q = 33 and p+q = 99
but here's the thing
if p+q is 33
we said earlier that the minimum p or q is 11
so the maximum p can be is 33 - 11 = 22
yes
compare this to p+q = 99
the maximum p can be is 99 - 11 = 88
since p forms the first two digits of r, larger p = larger r
so we focus on p+q = 99 because that will give us way larger p to work with
yes
so from here it's kind of enumaration/bruteforcing
we start from p = 88 and go down by 1
then check every possible p
let's start with p = 88
we try to substitute values/
is p = 88 possible?
because if we divide 8811 by 99 it doesn't give us a natural number
as the question clearly states that p+q divides r
why?
because 87 and 12 are coprime and they 8712 is divisible by 99
whats going on
its not coprime
good
i rushed
yes
p = 86?
it is
13
we know 13 is prime
yes
no
and does 8613 divide p+q?
99 divides 8613
I WAS STUCK ON THIS PROBLEM SO LONG
.close
nps
Closed by @halcyon plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry
anyways
im pretty certain there's a way to use cauchy schwarz here
but idk how
express f(1) in terms of f’
and express f’ in terms of f’’ to get f(1) in terms of f’’
and use cauchy schwarz
$f(1)=\int_{0}^{1}f'(x),dx$
TargetVN
yep
with an integral
idk how to express myself without giving the answer lol
like use FTC
im a bit confused here :L
$f(x)=f(0)+\int_0^x f’(x)dx$ right
tm
yes $f’(t)=f’(0)+\int_0^t f’’(x)dx$
tm
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
so do i do it like this
$f(1)=\int_{0}^{1}\left ( \int_{0}^{x} f''(t),dt\right ),dx$
TargetVN
yes exactly, but we would like a single integral to apply cauchy schwarz
rewrite f(1) as a double integral over a triangular region
huh??
the idea is that to use cauchy schwarz we would like to get $f(1)=\int_0^1 g(t) f’’(t)dt$
the thing is that that's calculus 2, whereas the problem is from calculus 1
tm
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
tm
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
i mean, i can understand why since i learned the basic of calculus 2 in advance
though, is that allowed in calc 1?
idk the programs sorry
but i don’t think lol
I also thought about the Lagrangian but I don’t think it’s in calc 1 
I can't see any other method than swapping the order of integration and using cauchy schwarz 
apparently i realized we had always been stupid
just ibp this LOL
$f(1)=\int_{0}^{1}f'(x),dx=\left [ f'(x)(x-1) \right ]{0}^{1}-\int{0}^{1}(x-1)f''(x),dx$
TargetVN
yeah but where did it come from lol
it's just there to cancel out the uv
u took u’=1 and v=f’(x) right
i might be wrong but the formule give me $f’(1)-\int_0^1 xf’’(x)dx$
tm
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
because u chose v=x
no i integrate 1
okay and now u apply cauchy schwarz
alright
I’d never have thought of integrating v’ with a non-zero constant
$f(1)=\int_{0}^{1}(1-x)f''(x),dx\leq \left ( \int_{0}^{1} (1-x)^2,dx\right )\left ( \int_{0}^{1}[f''(x)]^2,dx \right )$
TargetVN
bro u also taught me something new 😭
so we’re fair 😌
Closed by @vestal merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
cauchy schwarz for integral doesnt have square on the lhs??
nvm
yes but i think he did it with his head
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is 2^2^-1? I thought it would be (2^2)^-1, or 0.25, but Google calculator seems to think it's 2^(2^-1), or root 2.
$2^{(2^{-1})}$ or ${(2^2)^{-1}}$
calculators generally read exponentials right to left instead of the usual left to right
k
so 2^2^-1 = 2^1/2 = sqrt(2)
it depends on what u're trying to say
if its this, ye
I'm working on a calculator project, so I'm wondering which I should implement
for exponents reading right to left is standard
Closed by @light pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Good luck on your calculator project!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explains what this answer means😭
i suck at reading math notation
(i dont think i have to translate it since its pretty universal)
do you have the problem to go with this answer?
do you know what the notation means?
Let $\mathbb{N}_0$ be the set of nonnegative integers. Find all functions $f:\mathbb{N}_0\rightarrow\mathbb{N}_0$ such that $$\ f(m+f(n)) = f(f(m)) + f(n)$$
Copter
i know what each symbol means yeah
just not like "the big picture"
if you could, do you mind translating the stuff, because there's a lot that's just written out and not notation
sure
we just need the parts that aren't in english, the notation is fine
f(i) = ... for i = 0,1,..., a -1 where a in N, and n_0,...,n(a-1) in N0, and f(a+n) = a + f(n) for all n in N
therefore f(ap + q) = a(p + n_a) where q in {0,1,..,a-1) and p in N0
@marsh forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @marsh forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, here is aproblem. i don't need the solution just to know how to find it.
absolute values and what they do to inequalities conceptually is confusing me
$|x|<a \Rightarrow -a<x<a$
Alexis_Fx
a >=0 ofc
think of |x| <= a as the set of all points with distance to the origin less than a
and |x| > a as the converse
hmm
i will think about this give me a moment to ponder
distance to origin
seems useful
way of thinkingabout it
you should get x is ||from -a to a||
and this is just everywhere else, so you obviously get x > a, and x< -a
oh my god i got it
you are a gentleperson and a scholar
i was breaking into two inequalities when turning it into one is easier for this situation
for me anyway
well is your question answered?
Closed by @whole ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
inequality issues again 😭
same situation as before, but the -5 outside the absolute value symbol makes me think adifferent emthod is necesary
Just add +5 to both sides and continue from there?
Cheers
Closed by @whole ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\text{Given a polynomial} $P(x) = a_1 x^n + a_2 x^{n-1} + \ldots + a_n$. \text{Prove that if} ${a_n}$ \text{is a positive, real valued, non-decreasing sequence then} $P(x)$ monotonically increases on $\mathhbb{R}$
AvidDavid
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I'm just conjecturing this
i think your numbering is a bit off
kinda want to explore more about this and get it on a high-school research competition
also you dont need those \text commands
if you're indexing the coefficients starting from $a_1$ like this then the last coefficient will be $a_{n+1}$
Ann
can u pls see if it's alr been done before
oh yeah
so maybe you wanted $P(x) = a_0x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + \dots + a_n$ ?
Ann
you're given that 0 < a_0 < a_1 < ... < a_n then and you want to show P(x) is a monotone increasing function
not strictly less thatn
it just needs to be non decreasing
0 < a_0 ≤ a_1 ≤ ... ≤ a_n
if they're all constant then it's a geometric series and that's monotone increasing
yeah
for odd n btw
oh so we also know n is odd, ok
well the obvious idea is to look at P'(x) and attempt to show it's positive
the coefficients of P'(x) would be a decreasing sequence and the largest value will dominate
wait what
there'll also be a constant at the far end
since when do we know the coeffs of P'(x) are decreasing
oh sry i was working w the case that a0 = a1 = ... = const
and nvm i found a counterexample
hell
yea i mean this is obviously false
it’s very easy to construct p satisfying your conditions but having a turning point
yea i just constructed one
it works with a lot of stuff so i still have some hope of refining the conditions
it’s pretty clear when this would happen no? you just need to avoid turning points
yeah im trying to describe that rigourously
seems like we need to make P''(x) > 0 too?
no
you just need the roots of p’ to be of even multiplicity
and the leading coefficient of x^n to be > 0
your example of the coefficients being in some sequence is just refining it even more
which is aside from the point of what you’re trying to get at
backtracking this condition would be tough...
then don’t write the polynomial in standard form just write it in factored form
but having the factored form of P(x) doesnt yield the factored form of P'(x) easily no?
sure
i was more so saying the derivative but honestly i’m failing to see what’s interesting about this
why are you unsatisfied with "the roots of p’ need to be of even multiplicity"
Won't it be "increasing" in place of non-decreasing ?
constant sequence works
im just trying to look for interesting things lol
i doubt there’s a nicer answer in terms of coefficients
anything involving roots with n degree polynomials is just not going to go great
yeah, makes sense
x²+4x+4 = 0
Oh, i see.
@frozen ledge
yes
you’re saying this is sufficient?
Cuz turning points are caused by changes in concavity
that would be a point of inflection but what does that have to do with the coefficients?
That’s what im trying to figure out
alr lemme try some
for simplicity just take it to be 1
then you also need to take a_2 satisfying your conditions but of nondecreasing
it’s simplest just to consider n = 3 btw when you’re looking
the derivative is a nice quadratic and you can use the discriminant
@slim fossil Has your question been resolved?
So I’ve tested with a lot of stuff
And I found that all powers of x work
Nested logarithms work
Polynomials fail
If the nth coefficient is the nth prime then it also works
constant works
nth fibonacci also works
Tried with lots of sequences from oeis, as long as there are no “sharp” points it works
So both convex and concave
Even the nth harmonic number, if it’s the coefficient of x^n+1
<@&286206848099549185> any clues pls
what is your question
I’m seeing a pattern about odd degree polynomials, about its coefficients and the polynomial’s monotonicity
I thought it works for every non increasing sequence for its coefficients but it isnt
Ive been trying with diff things to try to come up w a condition
What is your pattern
if it the coefficients make up a sequence that grows nicely then the polynomial is monotonically increasing
im struggling to rigourously state the "grows nicely" part
we can't invent things I think there is no link with the growth of a polynomial function and the growth of this one on the other hand we could look at a condition of the roots of the polynomials in itself there is necessarily a link you will tell me because the coefficients of your polynomial function and your roots are linked but the formulas are horrible and irregular so we can't get much out of them
all the sequences i tried have polynomial/exponential/factorial growth and/or linear combinations of em
well not all polynomials work but im guessing something
if i define the coefficient $a_k = f(k)$ then if $f(k) >0$ and $f'(k)$ > 0 then shit works
AvidDavid
im trying to look into this
Proof
im trying
@slim fossil Has your question been resolved?
for n=3, we first assume P(x) = a₀ x³ + a₁ x² + a₂ x + a₃ is increasing without any extra conditions, then find out the minimum requirements for the coefficients
P is increasing iff its derivative P' > 0
so 3 a₀ x² + 2 a₁ x + a₂ > 0
a quadratic is non-negative iff its leading coefficient > 0 and it does not have two distinct roots
or that ax² + bx + c > 0 for all x iff a > 0 and b² - 4ac < 0
using this, 3 a₀ x² + 2 a₁ x + a₂ > 0 shows that
3 a₀ > 0 and (2a₁)² - 4(3a₀)(a₂) < 0
so a₀ > 0 and a₁² - 3 a₀ a₂ < 0
so a₀ > 0 and a₁² < 3 a₀ a₂
so P(x) = a₀ x³ + a₁ x² + a₂ x is increasing iff a₀ > 0 and a₁² < 3 a₀ a₂
the requirement a₁² < 3 a₀ a₂ can be rewritten to be easier to understand
since a₁² > 0 and a₀ > 0, we know a₂ > 0
but notice we ignore the sign of a₁ due to the requirements squaring it away
so a₀ x³ + a₁ x² + a₂ x is just as increasing as a₀ x³ - a₁ x² + a₂ x
we can then consider something nice which works if a₁ is not 0
if a₁ = 0, then a₁² < 3 a₀ a₂ is already true, so a₀ x³ + a₂ x is increasing iff a₀ > 0 and a₂ > 0
if a₁ ≠ 0,
a₁² < 3 a₀ a₂
|a₁²| < |3 a₀ a₂|
|a₁|² < 3 a₀ a₂
|a₁| < 3 a₀ a₂ / |a₁|
|a₁| / a₀ < 3 a₂ / |a₁|
now this can be easier read as:
(the ratio from a₀ to |a₁|) can only be as large as 3 * (the ratio from |a₁| to a₂)
so for a₀ x³ + a₁ x² + a₂ x + a₃, all you check is
- that a₀ > 0 and a₂ > 0
- if a₁ ≠ 0, that |a₁| / a₀ < 3 a₂ / |a₁|
nah i give up this is beyond me
As I told you, I don't think we can find anything satisfactory. It could even be false. We'll spend hours trying to find a counter-example.
well, it was worth working on. i thought i was onto smth for a while. thanks for the guidance
hope you have a great day
.close
Closed by @slim fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
U can try this if u want challenge Let ( P \in \mathbb{R}[X] ) be a non-constant polynomial such that ( P(x) \geq 0 ) for all real numbers ( x ). Show that there exist polynomials ( A, B \in \mathbb{R}[X] ) such that
[
P = A^2 + B^2.
]
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Clint
do you also mean nonnegative?
No P>0 but A and B not necessarily
can you use the fact that R[X] is a ring over + and *?
to establish closure and existence
Idk Wdym but go
oh we would be going backwards
I don't know, try and tell me if you need any clues, I'll just give you some. ping me.
Here is a hint: we can start by showing that there exists a polynomial ( C \in \mathbb{C}[X] ) such that ( P = \overline{C} C ).
Clint
using the FTA we can factor it into a bunch of linear factors (with even multiplicity because P is nonnegative, hence square) and quadratic factors
then for the quadratic factors $x^2 + px + q$ substitute $a = sqrt{\Delta}$ and $b = x+ \frac{b}{2}$ they become $a^2 + b^2$
AvidDavid
repeatedly applying $(a^2 + b^2)(c^2 + d^2) = (ac+bd)^2 + (ad-bc)^2 $and we're done w the quadratics
let
let b = 0 and apply this to the linear factors repeatedly and we're done
i didn't use complex conjugates but ig it's implied in the substitution step?
Yep great idea
What is c and d ?
other quadratics
I don't see how you conclude on that.
like one we can write it as (a^2 + b^2) the other we write it (c^2 + d^2)
Okay
then it's of this form, which is again sum of 2 squares: (a^2 + b^2)(c^2 + d^2) = (ac+bd)^2 + (ad-bc)^2
mistyped the sign there
mmh ok clever
just one fact not to forget is to prove that the dominant coefficient is positive
ur complex conjugation thingy is encoded in there somewhere right
oh yeah, that follows from the fact that P is nonnegative
Yep ur décomposition is clever but it’s exactly what we do with the conjugate
when i did it i just factored out the coefficient c then work w the monic linears and quadratics for simplification's sake
It's not easy to prove the same for multiplicity, I don't know your level but these are still non-trivial things.
we generally use analysis results for this if two functions are equivalent in the neighborhood of a point then the sign of the two functions in this neighborhood is the same
Use this result on +- inf for an and on a root for the multiplicity
odd multiplicity = change signs. P stays nonnegative => must only have even multiplicity roots
that was my intuition
Yep idea not a proof
i mean it's sufficient as a proof isnt it
No
if there exists a root with odd multiplicity then P will change signs at that root
but P stays nonnegative (no sign changes)
therefore no such roots
Why
💀 my teacher said so
ig we could go deeper and prove that
but idk lol
but you're right, eh, but you have to see why you do not have to accumulate knowledge of results without knowing how prove it. There are two ways to prove it, one as you stated: Let ( P(x) \in \mathbb{R}[X] ) be a real polynomial.
Suppose that ( a \in \mathbb{R} ) is a root of ( P ) with odd multiplicity.
Then we can write:
[
P(x) = (x - a)^{2k + 1} Q(x)
]
where ( k \in \mathbb{N} ) and ( Q(a) \neq 0 ).
We now study the sign of ( P(x) ) near ( a ):
- When ( x < a ), the factor ( (x - a)^{2k + 1} ) is strictly negative.
- When ( x > a ), the factor ( (x - a)^{2k + 1} ) is strictly positive.
- The function ( Q(x) ) remains either strictly positive or strictly negative in a neighborhood of ( a ), since it is continuous and nonzero at ( a ).
Therefore:
- If ( Q(a) > 0 ), the sign of ( P(x) ) is governed by ( (x - a)^{2k + 1} ), and thus ( P ) changes sign at ( a ).
- If ( Q(a) < 0 ), the conclusion is the same, but with opposite signs.
[
\Rightarrow P(x) \text{ changes sign at } a.
]
This contradicts the assumption that ( P(x) \geq 0 ) for all ( x \in \mathbb{R} ).
Hence, all real roots of ( P ) must have even multiplicity.
Clint
Let ( a ) be a root of ( P ) with multiplicity ( m ).
We know that:
[
P(x) \sim \lambda (x - a)^m \quad \text{as } x \to a,
]
for some ( \lambda \in \mathbb{R}^* ).
If ( m ) is odd, then ( (x - a)^m ) changes sign when ( x ) crosses ( a ), and thus so does ( P(x) ).
This contradicts the assumption that ( P(x) \geq 0 ) for all ( x ) near ( a ).
Therefore, all roots of ( P ) must have even multiplicity.
Clint
isn't this the same as the one above
just stated a bit more compactly
No, here there is something hidden, it's what I said above, two continuous functions have the same sign in a neighborhood when they are equivalent in this one.
the first is an algebraic proof using the factorization theorem and the second using analysis
well i haven't learnt analysis yet. intuitively they both conveys sort of the same idea
Yep
@slim fossil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slim fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Translation : Suppose f(x) is continuous on its domains and has the following table of variations (on the right).
Examine the function of g(x) = f(-x^2+3x) and draw its table of variations.
(yes, it is a multiple choice question but i want to know i should go about doing this generally with excerises that gives higher degree nested functions and/or higher derivatives.)
What I did is finding g'(x) zeroes like so :
If f'(x)=0 means that x is either -4 or 0, then that means g'(x)=f'(-x^2+3x)=0 has to mean -x^2+3x has to be equals to either -4 or 0. This turns out to be x=-1, x=4 or x=0
What I am having trouble with is how should i go about telling if g'(x) is larger or smaller than 0 in the domain from (-infinity;1)
@sick fossil Has your question been resolved?
@sick fossil Has your question been resolved?
1 trò khá là mẹo ông có thể làm là giải phương trình hàm để tìm f(x)
sau đó ông lắp f(-x^2 +3x) vào ra g(x)
lúc này có g(x) rồi thì tính đạo hàm của nó đơn giản
giả sử f(x) là đa thức thì mọi thứ đơn giản th
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This questionMathematical Olympiad National Round of this year of my country. So the question is,
There are infinitely many positive integers called a, b, c, d & e such that ab+4, bc+1, cd+49, de+25, ea+1 are perfect square numbers. Now,
a) Find such 3 positive integer solutions of a, b, c, d & e.
b) Prove that, there are infinitely many positive integers, such that ab+4, bc+1, cd+49, de+25 & ea+1 are perfect square numbers.
On the exam itself, I found a single solution for a, b, c, d & e. But since then, I tried to find more through trial and error but failed.
<@&286206848099549185>
hmm, oh i see something
difference of squares hmm
think about that
from there it should be trivial
Btw, does the proof require finding patterns between solutions? Cause taht's the only thing I could think of while finding the proof.
i guess not necessarily
So there are other ways?
the difference of squares thing
so you understand what relation there is between a and b
So we have to use Pell's Equation?
factor $x^2-y^2$
Element118
I got to this :
(k-√4)(k-√4) = ab
(k-√1)(k+√1) = bc
(k-√49)(k+√49) = cd
(k-√25)(k+√25) = de
(k-√1)(k+√1) = ea
wouldn't it be nice if the two products corresponded
Ye
what if they did
For ab + 4 = k^2
Then a could be = k-2 and b could be = k+2
Or a could be = 1 and b could be (k-2)(k+2)
@small marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
Closed by @hollow cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Set of all bijective function composition over a finite set what is the identity of this group?
the identity map?
@merry crystal the waht
id(x) = x
Closed by @slate basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There are four sockets on a bookshelf, each numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and eight different books. An (a name) divided all of the eight books into the four sockets such that each socket has at least one book, and the books are arranged vertically in a horizontal row with the spines facing out on each shelf. When done, An's two methods of arranging are similar if they satisfy the following conditions at the same time:
- For each socket, the number of books in that socket in the first method is the same as that in the second method.
- For each socket, the order from left to right of all the books is the same in both methods.
Call T the number of ways, different from each other (way 1 != way 2 != … idk the word in English lol), that An can arrange the books. What is the value of T/600?
Can someone please help guide me through this, i'm so lost T.T
@spark gull Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Why is this so similar to the one in the Vietnam national exam
cause it is lol
i just don't get how they figured out the way to do it, thought I would ask here for help
do you have link to original question?
Okay, so from the given condition we know the order in each "socket" does matter
That means we will need to use permutations
ok
here if u can read vietnamese
Let's do a smaller problem, we have 6 books a,b,c,d,e,f
How many ways can we arrange these 6 books into 4 "sockets"
6p4
=))))))
Bây h nha
Có 4 ngăn đúng k
Tức là có 3 vách
H tìm số cách đặt 3 vách đó vào khoảng trống giữa cách quyển sách
V có bao nhiêu khoảng trống trong 8 quyển sách ở đầu bài
7
thanks
Chọn 3 khoảng trống trong 7 khoảng trống có bn cách?
7c3
Oke, h xử lí vụ hoán vị này
Vì ta tính cả hoán vị trong cả từng khoang chứa sách
Nên ta chỉ cần hoán vị cả 8 quyển
hmm
là 7c3 x 8!
à à à ok
tức là hoán vị 8 quyển sách
sau đó đặt các vách vào giữa chúng thôi
nhanh gọn v
bn lớp mấy v
Năm nay lên 12
=)) ok
xin típ tư duy mấy bài xs được không :V
ý là ní nhìn rùi lm sao biết cách lm á
chắc lúc thi đến bài n là áp lực r nên nhìn cái đề hết muốn lm bỏ luôn T.T
Nếu xong rồi thì đóng kênh này nhé:)
Closed by @spark gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Cái bài tổ số tam giác sài chia hết
à bài đó t ngồi đếm =))
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hông mấy chỉ cách đó luôn ik
Closed by @spark gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this🙏
hello "susgusinabus"