#help-4
1 messages · Page 18 of 1
so thats really cealn
so the answer is
1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5
damn thats a cool problem
are you sure thats the answer?
adding a 1/6 to this gets us to 2.45
I might be wrong tho
but this is what i was told
yeah but minimum
says
its including
the 5 roll
whihc means the minimum cannot go above 5
so ur 2.45 might be
not including
the 5 roll
i really don't know. Can you explain me your solution
I have not studied this expected value stuff
do you see why this would be true?
acutaly theres an additional constraint whihc is that P(X > N) = 0 and P(X < 1) = 0 and X discrete
yupp just 1 min
i think i got it
(i took the starting value n = 1 here)
but yes i get what you are saying
now if we pair up terms on the right, we'll get this expression
yep exactly
totally makes sense
liek each >= is just hte sum of the equalities
yes and each term will have n copies of itself
got it
so knowing
that we only
ahve to find a way
to calcualte
P(min >= x)
and the probelm is solved
so for min >= x
u have to have some number of rollls
= x
and a final roll of 5
so for a length n sequence
u have n-1 rolls >= x and a final roll equal to 5
also those n-1 rolls do not equal 5
so that leaves u with 6-x possible numbers to roll
like each one of those rolls should show a number on the die that is >= to the minimum
yes
and the chance u roll something >= x and not euqal to 5 is just (6-x) / 6
so u do that n-1 times with a final 1/6 chance to roll a five
yes
gives you the probabliltiy for any length n sequence
yupp
u add taht up, giving u this forumula
okay makes sense
and qed
we add that up
then u geometric series to find its just 1/x
yes i will simplify that part
and i totally got
i got how we found this
but what i dont get is
P(min >=5) + P(min >= 4) + P(min >= 3) + P(min >= 2) + P(min >= 1)
this
how does this give us the expected minimum
can you explain it a bit intuitively if you have time?
here i will write it more explicityl
like i totally get this part
this is simple
but why are we adding these in the first place? how do these give us the expected value?
P(min >= 1) = P(min = 1) + P(min = 2) + ... + P(min = 5)
P(min >= 2) = P(min = 2) + ... + P(min = 5)
P(min >= 3) = P(min = 3) + ... + P(min = 5)
P(min >= 4) = P(min = 4) + P(min = 5)
P(min >= 5) = P(min = 5)
u get that?
I mean it was simple to prove😭
oh lol
totally get that
if u add all the equations
up
thats how i was able to prove that thing
u get our sum
=
1 * P(min=1) + 2*P(min=2) + ... + 5*P(min=5)
whihc is exactly
the definition
of expected value
okay thats what i didn't know
and why is it defined that way?
so its bsaiclay an average
yeah a weighted avberage
cuz think of it like this
lets say u ahve a coin flip with 80% heads
then your expected number of heads
is
0 * .2 + 1 * .8
because tails = 0 heads
and heads = 1 heads
ig thats not a very good example
but its just a weighted average
okay its like we want to know how many heads do i get (given that i know how many percent i can get or like the probability of a head)
now since i want to know the number of heads, i put tails = 0 and multiply probability of getting 0 tails with 0 and add that to probability of getting heads * 1
something like that
did i just write a lot of nonsense
no ur right
but heres a better example
liek lets say you pull a ball from a box
50/50 chance theres two balls
but one ball is 10kg and the otehr is 1kg
then whats the expected weight of the ball
would be
10 * .5 + 1*.5 = 5.5
10* 1/2 + 1 * 1/2
yeha
yep exaclty
and also the reason its litearlly a weightred average is because
sum of probabilities = 1
cuz normally in a weighted avg u have like
(ax + by + cz) / (a + b + c)
is the weighted average of x,y,z with weights a,b,c
but in probablilty, the probablilites act as weights, and since they sum to one the denominator is 1, which is why there is no denomintaor
in this case we actually referred to the value or measure of the object to be the weight
not the probability
so is it the probability that acts as the weight?
i guess that makes sense
like if we increase the number of 10kg balls to 2
then 10 * 2/3 + 1 * 1/3
the probabilities change but the objects remain the same (i.e. the 10kg and 1kg balls)
well the weight was just my example
so value would be a better word
so yes, the weights in the wegihted average are the probabilities
hmm makes sense
and so we generalised this definition of expected value just like that?
yeah
i dont think so
I mean this one makes so much sense for this example
like EV is defined to be the weighted average with respect to probabilities
nothing more nothing less
but I still can't wrap my head around the die problem
its just what it is
well
its hte same idea
like take expected value of just a single dice roll
each value 1,2,3,4,5,6 has probabliltiy 1/6
so its just liek drawing weighted balls
aucaltly the idea of EV also
is that
if u repeat
the trial
an infinite number of times
then EV is the average value you will get
so in your original problem
there maybe liek a 20% chance u get a minimum of 3
so if u reapeat ur problem an infinite number of times and note the minimum each time
and average them up normally (not weighted) then u will get teh EV
yes, in that given probelm
and the value 2.2833 lies in the middle
its the average for infinite number of trials
lets assume a very simple model for this problem
yes
since they want an average or expected value
so in the 20% of 3 case, 20% of all ur trials
will return a 3
and so it makes sense to assign it a weight of .2
we are actually multiplying each number in this by some weight
yes
and those weights are the probabilities for getting that respective number
yes
because probalbitly is the frequency/proportion
of ur infinite
trials
that will give that value
also to clarify, in this case, a single tirla is one sequence of rolling til u get a 5
(1 * P(1) + 2 * P(2) + 3 * P(3) + 4 * P(4) + 5 * P(5) + 6 * 0)/6
no
not /6
becuase u divide by the sum of the weights
which is 1 due to how probability works
yes makes sense
hmmm
i need to think more
thankyouu ^^
yeah just sleep on it
okay your answer is right
2.45 was wrong
wrote this code and ran it for a million trials
@night patio Has your question been resolved?
@night patio was aa2 able to explain this problem? If not I can try to solve it
You can probably get away with a tail sum
$$E[X] = \sum_{i = 1}^{5} \mathbb{P}(X \geq i)$$
he explained it to me
utop!a
alright :)
the final answer came out to be 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5
@tender field can you confirm it
thankyou for confirming :D
yea learned a lot. @fleet junco explained well
@night patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @night patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.
hold up lemme word this right
So for the second question in using chain rule u integrate it right?
What is the integral you wrote
Split it and use the chain rule yes
and this is the answers
To compensate
Did you computed the first integral setup?
I thought we needed to multiply it by 3/2 by 3
I am confused as why there are two integrals on your scratch paper
Bad working sorry
Becasue when you use the curve above subtract the curve below at point of intersection it should give you the correct result, there is no change order of curve
[ \int_2^6 (3x-2)^{1/2} \dd x]
Let ${u = 3x-2}$. Then ${\dd u = 3\dd x}$, so ${\dd x = \frac{1}{3}\dd u}$
[ \int_{u=4}^{16} u^{1/2} \left(\frac{1}{3}\dd u\right) = \frac{1}{3}\int_{4}^{16} u^{1/2} \dd u = \frac{1}{3} \left[\frac{u^{3/2}}{3/2}\right]^{16}_{4}]
Simplifying,
[ = \frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3} \left[ u^{3/2}\right]^{16}4 = \frac{2}{9} [u^{3/2}]{4}^{16}]
So you set up the integral or you can’t compute?
Why are there 2 integrals
cuz ones the curve others the line
You don’t need a second integral
Ohhhh ok thank you so much
Your first integral include the correct and sufficient information
I think I finally get it
u need to use chain rule no?
k
There we go
Closed by @quick mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo anyone here ?
Question plz
are u math expert?
No... But we will try our best to help
it really depends on the question
,
Oh...
Bruh
...
!close
Do you want a question?
But I need ur helps when I will be in class 9th
So u have a question😭
What kind of paradox is this gng💔
Future prep
Yeah.... We will help you with your problem when u have one
Booking a channel
.close
Closed by @noble anvil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Come when you have a question
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i do not understand how to solve this nor this solution? Could someone explain how is the 2nd step of the solution equal to 1, 3rd to 5?
ohh
Do u understand
Yes
Closed by @night peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let x,y,z>0. Prove that (x+y)/z^2 + (z+x)/y^2 + (y+z)/y^2 >= 2(1/x+1/y+1/z)
What have you tried?
I tried Cebishev
and rearranging inequality
this one
i think this one might work
oh
It was at the inequality theorems chapter so i thought i should use one of those
ok
the left hand side will be (x+y+z)(1/x^2 + 1/y^2 + 1/z^2)
yep
then AM-HM
yeah
divide both sides by 3(1/x + 1/y + 1/z)
no problem
.close
Closed by @polar jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
have you tried anything? 
nope I have no clue
what does it mean for f and g to have an intersection point? 
of course, their graphs intersect at an intersection point, but what does it mean algebraically? 
I got k>√(2)-3 and k<-√(2)-3
i have a feeling you will have to consider the fact that those two graphs can intersect twice, meaning you may need a quadratic if you didn't use that already
@desert idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @desert idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me with this question? Im having trouble dealing with area under the curve for polar coordinates
At which points do they intersect?
pi/2
This is how it looks like on desmos
Im confused with the constant and bound for integration
yea if its in a normal cartesian plane i could integrate it normally but idk how to deal with polar plane. the 4 axis on this plane is 0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2
Let us prove the formula for the area between two polar curves ( r_1(\theta) ) and ( r_2(\theta) ), where ( r_2(\theta) \geq r_1(\theta) ) on the interval ( \theta \in [a, b] ).
In polar coordinates, the area swept by a curve ( r(\theta) ) from ( \theta = a ) to ( \theta = b ) is given by:
[
A = \frac{1}{2} \int_a^b r(\theta)^2 , d\theta.
]
This comes from approximating the area of a small sector as:
[
dA = \frac{1}{2} r^2 d\theta.
]
Now, the total area enclosed by the outer curve ( r_2(\theta) ) is:
[
A_{\text{outer}} = \frac{1}{2} \int_a^b r_2(\theta)^2 , d\theta,
]
and the area enclosed by the inner curve ( r_1(\theta) ) is:
[
A_{\text{inner}} = \frac{1}{2} \int_a^b r_1(\theta)^2 , d\theta.
]
Therefore, the area between the two curves is:
[
A = A_{\text{outer}} - A_{\text{inner}} = \frac{1}{2} \int_a^b \left[ r_2(\theta)^2 - r_1(\theta)^2 \right] , d\theta.
]
Clint
Closed by @trim belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why solve the negation? something to do with the equal-to? i got the same answer either way
no it's rather that |A| < B is somewhat easier to handle than |A| > B
oh ok yeah i see now, i wrote -3>...>3 in my second step and didn't notice that that makes no sense, it just happened to work out
thanks!
.close
Closed by @dusk cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve this question? I don't know how to factor.
Has your teacher gone over how to factor yet?
He/she should have, if you're getting these types of problems.
An alternative is using long division for polynomials, but I doubt you'd know how to do that if you don't know how to factor.
No, I'm applying for college. I am very rusty. I haven't done math since high school.
I think easier way is to consider zeros
yeah there are a few ways to do this but focus on factoring
But polynomial long division should be a standard skill
I don't know how to do any of that. I was attempting to solve it using PEMDAS but I ended up very confused.
I see this and im like... ||just use quadratic formula||
I skipped math class like every day in high school too on top of that... 😭 💀
I regret it
yeah this might be the easiest way
yeah def
but OP should still learn to factor and do polynomial division
teach me
you can use khan academy
khan academy is good
in this case its quite easy to factorise but if it isnt, use quadratic formula
for this particular case id immediately factorise
so how do you factor?
right now, if you want to avoid factorizing and polynomial division, just find the roots
For this case ill immediately use quadratic formula. If it doesnt immediately pattern match something I can factor, i just take out the foolproof method
Watch a YouTube video instead of trying to learn from us
since every quadratic is in the form (x-r1)(x-r2) where r1 and r2 are its roots, you can just find the roots and get the factors
Much less confusion
^^^ for factoring
yeah
3x^2 x -18? = -54....
27 x -2 = 54 the number we just got and also 27 + -2 = 25
3x^2 + 27x - 2x -18
@glass finch Has your question been resolved?
No but you can go ahead and close it anyways
click on the ❌ to keep your help channel open
wait you want to close it, bruh i’m tired, you can type .close then
I guess I'll keep it open if any one decides to help me
not this?
tbh either one
yeah what everyone else is saying tbh
you would do this with factor by grouping
if you are lost by all the suggestion, i would say prerequisite knowledge is multiplying (foil) and adding polynomials, evaluating them (x^2-1 at x = 2 is 2^2-1 = 4-1 = 3), then the fact that if the polynomial p(x)=0 at a certain value « a » called a root, then you can factor a linear factor (x-a) out of the polynomial perhaps using long division example x^2-1= (x+1)(x-1). Then realizing this fact imply that finding the roots help you factor. then learning about the quadratic formula giving you the roots directly.
@glass finch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glass finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You roll a standard 6-sided die repeatedly until you get a 5. What is the expected value of the minimum value rolled before (and including) the 5?
@fleet junco Hi. I needed to discuss about this problem
Can you help please. I had a doubt.
Sure
this was the expected value right?
What if we calculate the P(1)
and P(2)
Like all these 5 terms
I basically thought of this
to get the probability of getting a minimum of 1 and an n length sequence
Now to calculate P(min = 1), I summed P_n (1) from (n = 1 to inf)
I get P(1) = 1/2
so is this correct?
Is that n or m length sequence?
it is n
Also we did solve this question yesterday using another method
.
simplifies to this
@night patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @night patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yes that is one way
to do it
but
its way harder
no actually
it was not that hard
obviously your method was easier
but this works too
had to think about it a lot haha
oh wow ok
but liek yeah thats really good
but liek yeah, these sorts of problems are always about splitting
into simpler cases
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to understand how vector rotation works and im trying to rotate <1,0> by any angle, i found out that there is multiplication matrix thing. Anyways im trying to figure out the math way to do that but i always get cornered by sin(theta) and cos(theta). I dont get it how to get the value of sin or cos in a math way
you mean how to get a numerical result for cos(theta) and sin(theta)?
yes, not the calculator way
θ
well there are only a few special angles where you can get an exact number, and even those will require a calculator if you don't want to leave it in terms of sqrt(3) etc
I know that there is for triangles
Ok I already answered that one
I want a math solution, like in algebra, plug the values and get back a single digit in that case x,y of an angle
is there no formula for that?
i only know cos, sin, tan for triangles where the adjacent, opposite and hypotenuse is used
Im so confused
I mean there is taylor expansion
just because you need a calculator doesnt mean that its not "a math way"
the formulas for sin and cos are just more involved than all the other stuff you have seen
so you do not ever want to do them by hand
Think about it, where can you find a right triangle? Inside a circle
well i want to do in programing but if you say so i guess i just use like math library, i just like doing things from scratch
Start by drawing a circle on a graph centered at the origin 0,0 and let its radius be r
Then just pick any one x,y on that circle
Then draw a line from that center which was 0,0 to your point, that's your hypotenuse, and length between them is your radius r
I mean, did you also implement things like sqrts and other roots yourself?
or did you let a math library handle those
same thing
i was planing do all things 
What are you confused about now
i only understand how i could use cos sin if i got 2 vectors on unit circle, than i could think about a triangle between <0,0> start and 2 vectors
anyways, my only issue is that i wanted to calculate cos and sin in a formula way to get that value between 0-1
here are the formulas you need
the series are infinitely long but the later terms are tiny so you can cut them off
the first 15 or so terms will be enough by far
First it's a value between -1 and 1. You're already ngmi if you think it's just 0-1.
Yeah as he said what you're looking for is the taylor series expansion
It's a way to calculate this stuff with just basic arithmetic, you just have to do it a bunch of times
oh right the dark moon side is -1
And x has to be in radians not degrees don't be a normie @sour dune
ok buddy, im europian xD
You do understand what the ! means correct?
Factorial?
Anyways thanks for help, ill try to implement tailor series and make a vector rotation from scratch.
but the more i do the more precise it is?
yes
you can just do a while loop depending on the precision you want
tho of course you will run into issues with double/floats anyway
@sour dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sour dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me simplify 52!/5!47! without the use of a calculator, my answer is 2, 140, 320 while my calc says 2, 598, 960. i simplified the 47 factorial first leaving 48 x 49 x 50 x 51 x 52 in the numerator and 1 x2 x3 x4 x5 in the denominator, so i cancelled out 2 with 48 which leaves 24, 3 with 51 which leaves 14, 4 with 52 which leaves 13, and 5 with 50 which leaves 10. this leaves me with 24 x 49 x 10 x 14 x 13 in the numerator which equals 2,140,320??? why is this wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
What school is that
wdym?
A calculator would get hard time while doing that 😭
But wait lemme think
prob rewrite 49*51 as 50^2 - 1
woudlnt that complicate it more? i dont think its a good idea to add an exponent into the equation
51/3 is not 14
@karmic hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
it'll close by itself, just leave it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
feynman's trick for integration
can someone explain it to me as a high schooler
Say you have an integral with set bounds (finite or infinite) and want to compute its value
Say $\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x}dx$
Raphaelisius Maximus MMIII
It would be easier to compute this if, say, the 'x' stuff wasn't there or was replaced with some exponential or trig function
Feynman's trick is you introduce an outside parameter
So that when you differentiate with respect to it
The problem part of your integrand goes away
So what if we defined $I(t) = \int_0^\infty e^{-tx} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx$
Raphaelisius Maximus MMIII
As when we differentiate by t
Some x gets outside, and will cancel with the x on the denominator
So we find $I'(t) = -\int_0^\infty e^{-tx}\sin x dx$
Raphaelisius Maximus MMIII
So now remember we're looking for this integral
Which is just a particular value of this family of integrals at t = 0
Now, the idea is FTC (fundamental theorem of calculus)
To find I(0)
Find I(some appropriate value of t)
And find I'(t) for all t
Since we find that I'(t) = -1/(t²+1), I(t) = -arctan(t) + some constant
Here the interesting t value is "t = infinity"
Then the computation you can do on your own, but that's the gist
@sick kernel Has your question been resolved?
@sick kernel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let KAM be a right triangle with angle K being right angle, side k is 24 cm and side m is 7 cm. Determine the length of side a correct to one decimal. Enter numerical value only.
What do we do when we are given two sides of a right angled triangle and asked for the third?
If you have a picture that'd be great
this is all it says
ive been doing these questions for like 3 hours i cant get them
It'll be the right angle with side K being the hypotenuse
its always off by a decimal or something
Yeah that makes sense
this sounds like it's calling for a certain law
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
uh 3
Show work
a
2
=k
2
−m
2
𝑎
2
24
2
−
7
2
576
−
49
527
a
2
=24
2
−7
2
=576−49=527
𝑎
527
≈
22.9
cm
a=
527
≈22.9cm
Yeah, can you tell us what your answer was and how you got there?
why did it do that
oh my goodness
Lmao
i tried to copy paste what i typed in
Send a screenshot
Well that's essentially what I got
oiaky wait
How are you supposed to submit the answer to this question?
it says
Is it possible it wants you to enter it exactly? Like sqrt(527)?
correct to one decimal
Ah
numerical value on;ly
Well
thats all
,calc (527)^(1/2)
Result:
22.956480566498
im suppsed to write that whole thing ?
no
Nonono
round to nearest tenth
5 rounds up
your final answer is xx.x cm
23.0
wait but what didi do wrong withrounding on the question
you rounded down
Oh well look at the 2 decimal places, 22.95
To round to 1 decimal place we round up, since the last decimal is 5
So 22.(9+1) -> 23.0
what is this picture tooken on
My local calculator app, Qalculate
taken
oh ok then
ooh ok thanks alot
how do you guys know so much about math
Lots and lots and lots of practice
how old are you guys
personally, practice, good out of school teachers, practice, friends, and more practice
28
and books
i'm their age, halved, plus 1
High school 
oh damn im only 15
oh hey, a peer
i turned 15 on the 13th
Yeah don't worry about being behind, I was a terrible student until I was like 23 and now I'm doing fantastic
Welcome to mathcord btw royal 
yeah thanks i appreciate iit
thank you
yeah lol
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @noble anvil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you solve E5=M^A if A=E
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
post the original question exactly as it was given to you
so they are just variables
what do u have to find M in terms of
cause it wont be a constant value as we dont know the values of anything here
i meant M^A
so can you help me?
ive been stuck on this question for a couple 2 days
so far this is just a bunch of nonsense
there is a lot of context missing
from E5=M^E and E5=E1+E2+E3+E4 with no other relationship between all those variables you can do absolutely nothing
who's "he"
do you have a picture or screenshot of the question? yes or no.
can you contact him again to ask for a clearer statement of the question
He then said M=4 billion kg
Well I dont know how he got that
I think Im missing some info
And he said 4 billion kg is a approximate that rounded up
So can we backtrack to see the missing info or no?
Hi, can you screenshot the message between your tutor and you? We’d like to check out his clarification.
he wants his info disclosed
The information is kinda scattered rn, it’d be better for you to rephrase and stick all of the information together.
Appreciate it, big thanks 
E5=M^A if A=E E5=E1+E2+E3+E4 then if we know M=4 billion kg in the equation
E5=M^A
is that enough info though?
there's not even a question to answer
and then what would the mass be then? if E5=M^A
well apparently the mass would be 4 billion kg
since that's what you said 3 messages ago

but still dont know how he got the answer
yeah….better screenshot the messages. It’s alr for you to hide his identity.
It’s not gonna work with these information
my guy this is just absolute nonsense
We know 0 context dude, what energy? Mass of what? What even was the original question? All we have is 2 equations including letters that werent even defined
we cant help with this
either you have to provide more context, or ask your tutor
then said E= energy so E1 is E
im so sorry
We've been telling you this from the beginning
No, don’t apologize. Let’s just make things clear. Is this question assigned by your tutor?
By any chance, could you provide the original question?
nah he just said its a challange question
It's not because we don't want to answer, but rather because we can't
We are not prophets 😭
I assume neither are you
And so??
i mean he said it a simple question
so did your tutor give you the question? Or did you send the question to your tutor asking for help? What's the source of the question?
nah he sent it to me
in text or pic?
Can you either ss the message (censoring the sender ofc) or write it word for word in here?
i cant because of the private policy contract would be violated
Then we CAN'T solve your doubt.
Well
Hmm, if everything is supposed to be private, i dont think we can help
Unfortunately
we cant help with a private question we cant even see
You'll have to ask your tutor about it
You should understand by yourself that the "info" you've given about the context is too little to understand what you're doing
Im sorry for the confusion its just always on my mind
Because my tutor said that if I get one of the questions of that equation right then I'll easily pass his teachings and wouldn't need anymore tutoring
The question is figuring out what the question is 
In the same boat as yall
But atleast we know that acceleration is apart of the equation of energy ...right?

I mean energy5
No, nobody knows anything like that because you haven't explained anything about the problem whatsoever
What is energy 5 
No….there is 0 progress
Energy5=energy+energy2+energy3+energy4
Is this related to kinetic energy?
He said yes
I mean he did say that when he sent "now find energy"
Do i have to use chat gpt?
Alr so, just for these information, what does “E” stand for?
Energy
Are you looking for E? Or E5
Yea
I mean no actual
Because where would E5 be in the equation if we just swapped it out
yeah, I revised it
Okay
Is there anything missing?
E1 is E and thats why we needed E5
Damn….you didn’t mention this earlier
You see where it gets confusing?
But sure, lemme update the information
Too many variables.
What’s your native language btw
So (4 billion)^E = E + E2 + E3 + E4
Yea
What’s your mother tongue
I see
I keep connecting them to each other
But can we answer the equation? Or do we have to ask for more info
We need more information
Better screenshotted originally from your tutor.
You gonna go back to class and the tutors gonna say it was a test to see if you could realise if the info is sufficient or not 
I've tried that method and it didn't work:'"
I go up to him and ask that question of is the info sufficient or not?
And if that was the question but he didnt answer
Also he then said that ^E=Mlog7
oh great a random 7 from nowhere
that makes even less sense
Why do you think im so confused
what is a big 7 
presumably log_7 vs log(7)
Log(7)
I cant with him sometimes you know?
He changes his mind so many times because it used to be log_7
get a different tutor then
But I do get what hes trying to teach me
Also is that enough info?
I feel like it is
this is still nonsense
no
Do we times the M with Mlog(7)?
Or what do we do
Because im out of ideas
Wait he got me more info and said that if ^5=Mlog(7) then E=Mlog(7) times the original equation
Are we getting somewhere?
Hire @noble anvil as your physic tutor
Closer and closer, but still not enough
So then the original equation was where A wasn't apart of the power
the pain
Can yall put that in one equation for me please I got so sidetracked with the messages that I forgot what the original equation was
And the he said E5=28th of the number of Mlog(7)
Number
I meant 28th number
a random 28th. it gets better
on the off-chance that you arent trolling, just fire your tutor
nothing of what you said made any sense
I mean and then he said E5=28th number in Mlog(7) I put the wrong info in
That's why
That mean we know what E5 equals so then we have to find out what E+E2+E3+E4 is doing in this equation
Wait one min while I find out what E2,E3,and E4 is doing
..were cooked
We are cooked
you've been cooked from the beginning
now you are utterly charred
you've become a lump of carbon in the oven
a very well done steak
etc
just fire this tutor😭
So basically what he said was that these are all similar equations that equal to a similar rule of the temperature of the sun is the power of all of them in different times zones
Of that supposed sun
this is nonsense or bullshit or both.
Then he gave me time zones
or maybe you could finally give us some screenshot of the tutor's message instead of continuing to play broken telephone!!!
Ann just give up. its pointless
.close
Lemme finish these please stop texting for a little so we can get all of this in one part of the messages
Closed by @noble anvil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
uh
Thanks
✅
Okay so E2=24 and we have to use the time zone of 12:00 July 15
As for the rule
Then E3=52 and the time zone for the rule is June 7th 12:50
2024
Then E4=8 and the time zone fo the rule is August 7th 12:30
Okay
Then he said use our sun of our solar system for a eazy estimate
August 2024 for the E4=8
Then we calulate
Okay I think we can talk now if this gave us all the info for E5=E+E2+E3+E4
To slove
their all am
amd E2=24 has the year of 2020
thats all the info i think
i need to go calulate all of this
wish me lcuk
he said it should take a couple hours to a month at least for one of these equations
i accidentally did 12:01 am July 15 time zone
:"""""
and used 2019
What does it mean?
Alr alr, can you put every current information together?
We have to accumulate every piece of them
that was the only one but it was actually E2=24 time zone of 12:00 a.m. July 24 and they are all a.m not pm
and at the year of 2016
I assume it’s not a pure physic question, more like a riddle
Do you contact your tutor in English or Vietnamese?
Hmm….
How about this, you copy your tutor’s message instead of screenshotting them
Messages regarding the question ofc
cuz we have helpers that speaks French
you sure i cant just translate it? because his "French" is too old that i had to ask a special translator to change his wording into actual reading words in english
he's even using slang that is not in date with the new ones
Don’t tell me the special translator is AI
We would be upset but at least this explains why the question looks so scattered brain
i pay extra for a translator in Canada to tell me what he's saying and sometimes she doesn't even know some of the time
of wwhat hes saying
so what do we do now?
yeah, we’re not buying this.
Unless we get full content of the question, we’re not going anywhere. Sorry for your inconvenience.
bro
if the question is supposed to be private
why r u telling us thi
why r u asking us
bruh this guy is obviously trolling
but not have it were he could take leagal action
its a new account
since when is he gonna take legal action over a fucking math problem
First day on discord and this is what you decide to do
because he is a troll
so i cant show his contract? but yall call me a liar
show it
I've been stuck with this crazy guy for so long trying to get at least one question right so i can leave his stupid tutoring
i made it my goal to atleast answer one question
and this one wa the most simple of the bunch
should i answer it my own?
these goofy-ass questions can honestly go fuck themselves
get a better tutor with better questions
ima try to answer it bymyself
trust that ima be back in about 3 years with the answer
just make sure the timezones of the energies dont change during that time
@proper marten I think the complaint is just simply that you're not explaining the question clearly, and in fact, you actively refuse to
mathematics is more collaboration than competition
if you can't help us help you, it will never work out
.close
Closed by @drifting hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
lmao
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The integral on the right has a_k complex numbers so what would its integral be some solutions use just ln and not complex log
,w int(1/(x^24 +1)) dx
Here for example it uses half csc half of the logs (assuming complex ones mixed so thst its real inside )
But from what i see here there isnt no i arg
Oh conjucatives might cancel Im parts
I guess you could say they are similar, but $\int\frac1{x-a_k}dx\neq\ln|x-a_k|$ apparently
;(
Yeah
It is
But ln isnt real ln its complex ln
When lnz = ln|z| + i arg(z)
Yes, that's how wolfram treats it
Of course mse lies to me
I asked the exact same question and they said this, so I gave up
@open niche Has your question been resolved?
If its refered to complex z then it is
To answer the question, it depends on the notation that you're using (e.g. ln and log can be mixed up), and I would say that if it uses ln in the real sense, there would not be a proper integral
What form of roots should i use
When expanding this
e^iθ or csc
Whats best form you can use for representing all roots ak
e^iθ or csc
For easier expansion
i would say something like
$\eta_k$ with a note "where $\eta_k, k=0,1,...,23$ are the 24th roots of -1
gfauxpas
@open niche Has your question been resolved?
Thats what it says lol
Just instead of η i have a
