#precalculus
1 messages · Page 300 of 1
thanks for the help
It’s 1:33 AM now xD
,w limit of (sqrt(1-sinx)(tanx-(1/(sqrt2tanx))),x->pi/2
Hmm
Probably
ok bye and thanks
Ur welc
Well using a+bi, you'll see that a has to be equal to 3 and y has to be equal to -7
I meant x has to be equal to 3 lol
Can someone help me start this?
ty, ig i was overthinking it
just sketch it in a program
hello anyone pls help
So I need to find all complex solutions for the following equation: 4x^4-25x^2+36=0
From synthetic division I found that -2 is a zero. And I got the following equation: 4x^3-8x^2-9x+18
$(4x^3-8x^2)-(9x+18)$
caley
$x^2(4x-8)-9(x-2)$
caley
but i'm struggling to get further from this to find the other solutions
write $x^2(4x-8)$ as $4x^2(x-2)$
Ann
should be of some help
,tex but how did you get this $$ 4x^2(x-2) $$
caley
Knowing that:
Show that the expression below is convergent towards a limit gamma in the interval (0, 1)
so basically the harmonic series H(n) - ln(n)
as n goes to infinity
I'm only allowed to use sequences, so all of this is not in a continuous context
Do you know monotone convergence theorem?
no, can you tell it briefly?
A sequence that is bounded and monotone (increasing or decreasing) is convergent
How is that relevant to this question?
So showing that a(n) is monotone decreasing and finding a lower bound for it is enough to prove it converges
I believe it is increasing not decreasing
oh yes, the difference is increasing
oh ok
how should we approach that with the starting inequality?
There is a clear relationship between terms of the form 1/x and ln(x) with respect to integration
So look at left/right riemann sums that approximates an integral of 1/x that evaluates to ln(n)
of couse, knowing that area under ln is 1/x
problem is i cant really use that knowledge into this, im supposed to just use the inequality
Oh, I didn't see the given inequality
Can you show it is decreasing using that inequality?
|| Take a_n and use the given inequality to replace ln(n) with something smaller that results in getting a_(n+1)||
well using inequality we'd have: ln(n+1) - 1/n < ln(n) < ln(n+1) - 1/(n+1)
so replacing ln(n) to get smth smaller we use ln(n+1) - 1/n+1 and the new series is smaller than a_n and we get a_n > a_n+1 so monotone decreasing
are you doomed to fail if you aren't familiar with trigonometry and algebra formulas? In precalculus.
yes
learn them immediately
especially for limits
when u will start limits, knowing how to factor is a must
its essential
wait, limits is precal or cal 1?
limits is cal 1
anyway
you will learn limits anyway so ye you need to know ur trig and algebra
Is there like a AIO formulas sheet preparation
well like for the start of precal u need to know that cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 and ur trig identities and also double angles
and also ur factoring formulas
like diff of squres
diff of cubes
sum of cubes
etc etc
how to factor by grouping
u need to know how to deal with abs functions
how to deal with rationals
and square roots
there isnt rlly a formula sheet...
its pre cal
in pre cal u get into limits and derivatives
and u stop there
ALL memorized?
I have a hard time on trig identities without looking at the formulas. Although I do see a very similar relation compared to algebra factoring formulas like a^2 + b^2. Maybe I need to find a way to relate to them easily in my own way.
yes
technically u just need to memorize the first trig identity
cos^2+sin^2 = 1
the other are derived from dividing by sin^2 and cos^2
Hi, I have a question with regards t setting up a precalc problem
Steve and Elsie are camping in the desert, but have decided to part ways. Steve heads north, at 6 AM, and walks steadily at 3 miles per hour. Elsie sleeps in, and starts walking west at 3.5 miles per hour starting at 9 AM.
This is supposed to be solved on a two axis coordinate plane
But I see 3 axis
N/S, E/W, and time
How do I set this up?
Damn, these math problems are so dry even the cactus would of died. It's no wonder how the math department isn't able to get anyone interested in mathematics lol.
Ok and?
Are you mistaking me for attacking Speedbird48's question where I am only address the concern of dry math problems in general?
No, I just dont see a need for a comment like that
There's no need for a comment in search for a better way to learn mathematics?
learning and educating are different things, your comment leans more toward a comment on education in my interpretation.
#math-pedagogy is also a more apt place to discuss.. pedagogy
Sure, so what's there a no need of?
and that's determined by you?
respectfully of course.
And in what way is your opinion on math problems relevant in any way?
Consider setting the place where both are camping at the coordinate point, up would be North, right would be East. Does that help?
I am being helped in another channel but I greatly appreciate you offering help
I was confused about where to put questions
Sorry about that
No worries
I am simply pointing out how math can be uninteresting in hopes someone who understands more in math can challenge my idea into a more well-rounded mindset. So that those who share the notion of math not being very interesting can better understand how to learn math in a more fun or productive manner.
In a way you can say I'm also seeking for help, but just not directly correlated to specifics of a math problem.
Challenge these views somewhere else, these are question channels and there are rules on how a user must behave. Consider looking into the social channels
Again, the pedagogy channel is a place for discussion on pedagogical practices, or any of the discussion channels. I'm not saying I'm the leading figure in pedagogical practices for math, I'm just a teacher candidate.
i'd like y'all to drop this. the instigating comment itself was unnecessary but blowing up chat over it is much worse
Hey all!
I wanna learn calculus but not sure what prerequisites I should know
Im good in my algebra, meh in my geometry and have no motherloving clue about trigonometry
What should I learn?
definitely trig
geometry doesn't matter too much when starting in calc, but trig is very important
so if you don't know that, i suggest learning trig before you start with calc
So, what good trig books must a high school sophomore student who studies under a mediocre education system get in order to progress?
honestly i'd suggest youtube over books
not only is it free but it's probably easier to understand
well in my experience, I just jumped right in lol
Ah, i see
and just learn anything that you need to learn as you go
Well, i have thomas calculus...
you'd need decent knowledge of coordinate geometry
is it one of those huge books?
I heard its one of those introductory books, actually
I mean in size
Nah, im not sure. Ive got a pdf of it and its 800 pages

"introductory"
hmm probably also has stuff like multivariable calc and DE's near the end
😔 Wish i knew what all that meant
me too dude
But is there at least like a list of things to know before I jump in?

have you taken precal?
nO
I mean obvious ones being coordinate geometry, and other things you've learnt at school
Yeah... But...
trig is pretty important but I just learned it while learning calculus
i'd suggest precal before calculus lmao
tbh introductory calc really doesn't need that many prereqs ... like the most important would be a good understanding of coordinate geometry and algebra
pre-calculus
So... Is precalc all ill need 😔
it will give you a strong foundation, yes
yea but if you feel like jumping right into calculus to test the waters then why not
ofc since you don't have the knowledge from precalc it can be quite hard but the internet is a mans best friend
though i definitely don't suggest it
...
Im a man of challenge
but I also take precautions
ill do both
Ill learn just enough that I feel comfortable getting in
But ill also explore the ideas more and interpret what I can from them using my knowledgebase
trying to learn calc before getting a foundation isn't much of a challenge, more doing yourself a disservice
Also there's no point in reading books if you don't also practice
you can find many excellent problems to solve on the internet
if it's a good intro book, the early chapters should give you some decent reciew
yea the book I started out with had a whole chapter on trig and functions and all precalc stuff before beginning
Ive got one last request...
Throighout my high school years we've NEVER dived into graphs
Not one but
Bit*
but if you have no experience in any precalc topic, you're better off finding a resource designated for precalc
oof
So...
Im worried about my algebra
What I already dont know
Im thinking of this
I need to get:
- a good algebra book
- a good precalc book
- a good trig book
Is this a good approach to this?
everything you can find in a book you can probably find on either the organic chemistry tutor's youtube channel or on khan academy
but if you really want to buy books, go for it
don't need an algebra book unless you're doing linear algebra (in which case you'll be using a more advanced one)
Buy?
BUY?
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zlibrary was my best friend from the day I was born
yeah, im sorry, man. But I just dont have that kind of finances on me
Im trying to gather what I can and honestly, pdfs are the only thing im educated from
khan academy is free
Yeah, but many steer me away from it
and an amazing resource
just so you know it's against discord TOS to encourage pirating
is it?

who steers you away from it?
Ive got a friend of mine whos into calc alrsady
He says the calc material in there isnt tip-top
ofc one shouldn't rely solely on khan academy but it's a very great resource

you shouldn't rely on it completely,
but it's decent enough for an intro into the topic
rely? no
well precalc covers most of early algebra
༎ຶ‿༎ຶ
those will be extremely important when doing calculus
So, so.
- learn precalc
- learn trig
practice both
And research the topics in calc if I have no idea what theyre on about
pretty much yeh
Will my algebra be sufficient, i wonder
6
yoo wtf
how did you do that
can you help with this too
hmm
im not 100% sure about that one
oh
i got 64 for this but im not 100% sure
it worked
oh
omg
your so good
do you know how to do this one too
legit i simplified it
and it still gives me something with log in it
do you want me to give my working out for q2 or do u want me to do q3
w3
q3
1/4
do u want the working out for q3
yeah can you do these two tho
those 2 first or the working out for previous questions
second one is kinda wierd tho i think it either means 5^3-log_5, 7
those 2
or it means 5^(3-log_5, 7)
40
125/7
damn
yoru smart
do you know if the domain is all real numbers
im pretty sure its allrealnumbers
but it don't work
domain and range is my weakness
oh
im pretty sure x can be all real numbers in any logarithm
the base is >0 and != 1
yes
so doesn't that mean x = allrealnumbers
for domain
my guess would be x=3/2 since log2(2sqrt(2)) = 3/2
im not 100% sure though
yeah i got the answer
i know its x = 3/2
but its asking for domain
it thinks domain is wrong
i think the domain is only x=3/2
i cant do it too hard for me
sorry
oh alright
its okay though
you helped a lot
thanks
no problem
do you still want the working out for the previous questions
or do u want me to skip them
its fine you don't have to do it
im gonna spend some time thinking about the domain
alright
@small tree have you made any progress so far?
no i m working on it
okay. can you post your attempt once you're done or stuck?
use trig
when it gives u degrees, use trig
angle a is 35 deg
u know x = 14
therefore AC = 14 +r
u want to find r therefore we have
$sin(35) = \frac{r}{14+r}$
IAMTHEFARMER
because $sin\theta = \frac{opposite}{hypthenuse}$
IAMTHEFARMER
IAMTHEFARMER
IAMTHEFARMER
then u solve
Are there no ways to find out the equation of a hyperbola if the only given were the center, the vertices, and the transverse axis length?
oh lmao let me take another
also I'm being asked to simplify
Basically this
I got this far
I’m stuck
consider conjugates and pythagorean trig identities
I'm not very well versed yet lol, we got this hw after a hour session, this is completely new to me
so like
cos^2x + sin^2x = 1 and such?
yes
start by multiplying the numerator and denominator of your initial fraction by
1 + cos(x); which is the conjugate of the denominator
and you can apply cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1
to simplify the denominator after that
we can but they should mention the axis of hyperbola are x and y axis!(then we can exactly say the equation of not there exists many hyperbolas with different axis)
Yeah a correction was given to us regarding the problem, now I finally solved it
yes
u can sub tan x=sin x/cos x
can i check for this qn right, i could come up with three equations
- cos theta = x / L
- 1.8/(2.4 - x) = y/ x
- x^2 + y^2 = L^2
so i can manipulate till it’s left with theta and x in equation 1 or theta and L (with two variables)
doing dL/dtheta = 0 would give the correct ans, but does dx/dtheta work? thanks!
for differentiation optimization qn, the dy/dx, must the y be referring to the actual thing like here since we wanna maximise length so y has to be L
did you survive the squid game?
Reposting as requested by Ryam.
And at the end you just differentiate L(θ) and find the maximum
You'll end up with something like: tan^3(θ) = 1.8/2.4
Posting as requested by Ryam to copy and paste his image and text.
when finding the limit as x->inf (sqrt(x+1)/x) we get a case of inf/inf. so at that point i tried dividing each term by the highest term in the denominator which is x
which gives inf/1 = inf
but this is wrong
because apparently i need to rationalize the numerator first
is there a rule that i basically need to always rationalize the numerator before applying the division by highest power method?
help appreciated
can someone help me with a problem
can no one answer mine?
in a polynomial, can the number of points of discontinuity be defined by the degree of the polynomial? example does the function 4-x^2/4x-x^3 have 3 points of discontinuity?
what did you get after dividing each term by x?
might you have fucked up at that stage?
Think about when this function is undefined. This occurs when the denominator is equal to 0. So find solutions to the equation 4x - x^3=0
you see x(4 - x^2)=0
So the solutions are x =0, and the solution to 4 - x^2 = 0. Isolating for x gives x = 2, x=-2
But the problem is after doing that you end up with the same expression again.
You can push that x inside the sqrt making it x^2 and then the whole inside approaches 0 so, the limit of whole expression is 0.
Hello, I was just wondering. I’m solving a proving trigonometric identities question, it is 1-tan^2x/1+tan^2x= 1-2sin^2x. I took the pythagorean identity for the denominator so it became 1-tan^2x/ sec^2x. Is it right if I separate these to become 1/sec^2x - tan^2x/sec^2x? For it to become cos^2x - sin^2x ➡️ 1-sin^2x-sin^2x ➡️ 1-2sin^2x ?
parentheses!!!!!!!
but yes, aside from the lack of parentheses with plaintext fractions what you're doing is correct.
Okay, thank you for the reminder!
can someone please help me integrate this
ohkayy.. thank you very much
How will I know if two angles are coterminal? I'm given 185 degrees and -545 degrees. Should I subtract 185 to -360 and add 360 to -545?
subtract your angles from each other
then see if the difference is a multiple of 360°
if it is then your angles are coterminal, if it isnt then they are not
Oh okay, I got -360°. What if I get negative answers but they're multiples of 360°, they wouldn't be counted?
Like what if I got -720 degrees? it's still wrong?
You subtracted 185 and -545 and got -360? Idk how you did it, but no, it doesn't matter
It just means you subtracted the larger one from the smaller one, instead of the other way around
If you did it the other way around, you would get the same number but positive
Yes, I subtracted 185 and -545 and got -360. Was it supposed to be -545-185?
So if it doesn't matter if I get an answer that is a negative multiple of 360°, it would still be coterminal then?
Whoops it's supposed to be addition that's why haha
thank you for the help ^^
,calc 185 - (-545)
Result:
730
Thank you!
have you learned about factor theorem
use synthetic division, create the factorable poly, then find the zeros
(x-1)(x+2)(cx-d) = Ax^3+Bx^2 +x+6
Expand and compare coefficients
beep boop
Can someone explains this for me?
(a-2b/a+b) - (2a-b/a+b) = -1
so since the bottom denominators are equivalent, you have: [a-2b -(2a-b)]/a+b
then for the numerator: a-2b-2a+b = -a-b = -(a+b)
bring that back in
-(a+b)/(a+b) = -1
Wait let me think about that a sec haha
The y will be whatever the x going through that comes out as so at -2 it is (-6+2/-2-3 -> -6+2/-5 -> -4/-5 -> 0.8) then -1 (-3+2/-1-3 -> -3+2/-4 -> -1/-4 -> 0.25) 0 is (2/0-3 -> 2/-3) 1 is (3+2/1-3 -> 3+2/-2 -> 5/-2 -> -2.5) and I will finally do 2 (6+2/2-3 -> 6+2/-1 -> 8/-1 -> -8) now you may also notice that 3 is undefined for this function if you wish you could try to use a limit to get what happens as x approaches 3, but I am not going to, so to graph that function you would do exactly what I told you with theoretically every x now this is normally what the calculator is supposed to do for you, but for some reason it seems you want to try it yourself? Either way good luck!
How did you get '-a-b '?
a-2a is -a, b-2b is -b
And since it’s a-2a + b-2b
You collectively get -a-b
Ah thank you!
No worries
$csc\theta = \frac{1}{sin\theta}$
IAMTHEFARMER
@fathom phoenix
Hey can someone help me study for my math exam :D
<@&286206848099549185>
Right now I'm struggling with this question
Can someone explain;
(x^3-3x^2-10x)/(x+2) = x(x-5)
how far have you gone with this problem?
look carefully at the x variables on the numerator
see how you can get stuff to move around on the top
Yeah i'm trying different things
just to start you off, notice how we have x in each term on the numerator
which allows you to take out x
so you'll have x(x^2 - 3x - 10)
on top
next step would be to reformulate that expression so a (x+2) can pop out and it cancels out with the bottom
and your leftover would be (x+5)
so you'll have to factor
Okay i'll let you know
thats just a graph what is the question
.
Can someone show me how to do this?
you would need to determine these things:
Period
Amplitude
An y-intersection
your equation should be in the form Acos(ax+b) or Asin(ax+b)
sometimes the a factored out
but anyway
the period is to find a, a=2pi/Period
the Amplitude is to find A, A=Amplitude
and the y-int is to find b, y-int=Acos(b) or Asin(b), depends on which equation you use
in some cases, you could also use the x-int to find b, but usually y-int is used because its easier, and quicker
It is merely the result of cross multiplication and collecting it into a polynomial in x
That is what I suspect
no black magic really
how the hell... i dont get it
OK Thank goodness
hey, so
For a function f(x), you know that f(3) = -8 and f(4) = 3. One zero of f(x) would be located between x= and x= ___
aight ty
how do you apply the 6 circular functions (e.g., cos, sin, tan, sec, csc, cot) in real life ?
many ways
as one example, consider a building of some height and some distance from you
it is possible to (relatively easily) measure the angle of elevation to the top of the building
then, if you know either the distance to the building or its height, you can find the other via multiplication by tan(θ) or cot(θ) respectively
@hearty wolf does this answer satisfy you?
in the question - "at what points on the curve x^2 + y^2 - 2x - 4y + 1 = 0, is the tangent parallel to the y - axis?" ; does " when tangent is parallel to y - axis " indicate that the derivative should be found with respect to y?
or u can realise that the curve is a circle and centre-coordinates ± radius for x-coordinate is the answer
How do I solve this? I figured since they were telling us cosΘ is .25, to convert to radians we'd just multiply .25 by (180/pi) but that gives none of the answers in the choices.
Ah, I see. Duh lol. They would of given the degree symbol or just said degrees. So, I can just use arccos(.25). The answer is D.
Thank you.
the outputs of trig functions are rarely if ever interpreted as angles in their own right
I think I'm missing the trick here.
Translation: Given y, How many integer m in [-6,6] such that y has 4 asymptotes?
So for sure, y has one asymptote, but now I will have to find a condition for m such that the denominator has 3 unique roots and none of them is x=3. I seem to have hit a roadblock there
I mean i do know there is a discriminant for a cubic but i would really really want to stay away from that
The denominator is always zero for x=m, perhaps factor it out and see where that leads
In either case even when you factor it, you will still have to check each factor so you don't have (x-3) at the bottom
oh, how did you obtain that root? rrt?
I mean that was the first thing I thought of doing, because of the (2m^2 + 1)x term
oh right
hmmm yeah, did not catch that
alright, so its just factoring and checking, thank you
np
Use rational root theorem
And the factor out polynomial of second degree
I graphed the function and none of these possible roots are true
are you asked to find the roots?
bc it does seem like you're out of luck. all three roots here are kinda nasty
i had a similar issue from a previous test but this problem is asking for something different
You don't need the roots then. You need to know Vieta's formulas @robust star
Which tells you what the sum/product of the roots are in terms of the coefficients
Is there a way to find the roots?
Not really a nice systematic way
I mean there are formulas but none that they would expect you to know
So it's possible to find them, but you don't need to
I ran into the same issue during a test where it asked me to find the roots. I guess i have to talk to my teacher about it. ty
@robust star you are not asked to find the roots
You can do the question without finding them
That's the point
ik i don't need to find the roots for this problem but in the past I was asked to find the roots.
Then possibly there was a way to find them in that question
ill look into it
👍
mechap
mechap
I figured it out :')
(x^m)^n = x^mn
Aslan
Lol
i dont like this notation
why would you want to do that
idk if i trust mashing together set and interval notation but uhh im just a dumbie so idk 😄
^
no braces
your thing is valid as-is but it'll just evaluate to R because (-∞,5) is not a member of R
y=-f(x+1)-3
the - negative symbol in front of f is reflection across the x axis?
so it would be (-x-1, y-3) for mapping notation?
Did you reason through the meaning of the negative symbol or are you asking because you are seeing if the rule you remembered is right?
seeing if i remembered the rule right @red tree
Ah well the rule actually follows from the definition of a function and the definition of a graph
without any further memorization
ok but did i get it right
Not sure, I forgot the rule

F(x)=(x^2-7x+6)/(x^2-2x+1)
Where is the graph above the x-axis in interval notation?
(-inf,1)?
And below? (1,+inf)?
F(x) = (x-6)(x-1)/(x-1)^2 = (x-6)(x-1)
It will be above the x axis if x-6 and x-1 are either both positive or both negative
And it will be below the x axis if the one is positive and the other is negative
So your answers should involve both q and 6, not just 1.
guys i dont understand log much but our class almost have a test so can u guys explain for me what is log?
inverse of exponent
The definition is
The logarithm to the base $a$ of a number $x$, denoted $\log_a(x)$ is the unique number $y$ such that $a^y=x$.
Icy001
So like, everything you need to know about what log means is in the definition (that's how math works)
ty
Cool problem. Did you cover the definition of the derivative yet?
common denominator
The wiggling emogis on this server are creepy.
okay then why did we multiply (3n+8) by (n+8), why not (n+7)?
...common denominator
You're just mixing up what's new, look again
r u talking to me
omg pls help i still dont get it
like we multipled everything by n+7 but why did we multiply by n+8
common denominator
recall the basics for combing fractions through addition/subtraction
the LCD is (n+8)(n+7)
yep
the frac on the left was multiplied by (n+7)/(n+7) to get that denominator
similarly the frac on the right was multiplied by (n+8)/(n+8) to get that same denominator
?
im confused like on the right fraction for the numerator we multiplied by (n+8) and for the left one we multiplied by (n+7) why not the right fraction multiplied by n+7?
im sorry man im just forgot the common denominator cuz we didnt take this since grade 7
because the right fraction already had (n+7) in the denominator
and forgot it
because (n+7)(n+8) = (n+7)(n+8)
recall the basics for combing fractions through addition/subtraction
starting with something a lot simpler like:
$$\frac 12 + \frac13$$
ohhhh
ℝamonov
the domain for f(x)=3(x-2)^2-5
the domain is {x e R } and range is {y e R | y greater or equal to -5}
is this correct?
Disorganized
aka $(-\infty,\infty)$
Disorganized
...but you know this, just...I just don't want to do my homework.
R doesn't include -inf or inf
How sure are you about the order of these things?
order ? @red tree
domain.
compression by 0.5
oh!
yeah, round braces, scuse me
aaaand the LaTeX won't update. My sins on display forever. ~~
wait no
horizontal stretch by a 1/2
all x co ordinates divided by a 1/2
so they are all multiplied by 2
so u can instead say its a compression by 2
wait
either works
yes the x co ordinates
so 1/2(x +1.5)
so if a point on the curve was (1,5) then itd become (2,5)
Yeah, the order in which you wrote the transformations
why 3 left not 1.5 left
this
whats the original function that they want to be transformed to this
stretches first then translation
and anyway you wouldn’t multiply 1.5 by 2, one transformation doesn’t affect the other
the transformations only affect the graph you’re transforming
so the compression by 2 wouldn’t affect the other horizontal shift to the left by 1.5
well that’s what my teacher wrote
Vertical stretch by a <-> left composition with multiplication by a
Vertical shift by a <-> left composition with addition by a
Horizontal stretch by a<-> right composition with multiplication by 1/a
Horizontal shift by a <-> right composition with addition by -a
is the horizontal shift 1.5 units to the left?
I haven't looked at it closely, although I could figure it out myself. Do you know how to figure it out yourself without appealing to remembering what the teacher said?
It's quite possible you never learned how to
ye its whatever is added to x
u go left by x units
and if something is being minused from x then u go right by x units
so for this @red tree is it left 1.5 units
If you figured it out why are you asking me like I have the answer lol
im double checkin if its right
im not the one who asked the question so i dont know what the original function was
bruh keep up
Well then the whole question is not well defined and your teacher needs some reprimanding, isn't that the conclusion
its not my teacher i didnt send the question
Let's say for the sake of the argument that the original function is x^3
Do you know what the original function was?
what
Translations and dilations are transformations from one shape to another shape
They aren't just properties of a shape
if you ask the same question with parent function (x-1)^3, you'll get a different answer
Lastly, I said that the meaning of the correct answer is visible if you plot the two functions
So consulting the answer key or teacher isn't the main way to check a problem like this
(there could be ambiguity in which a horizontal dilation is equivalent to the inverse vertical dilation but you can readily see the functions are the same in these cases)
what r u trying to say i dont get it
what
one of the roots is 0
are you telling my match teacher who has a math and teaching degree shouldn’t be consulted for asking for help and getting answers?
i don’t know what you are even saying
No, depends on the problem
This is one of those where you should be able to make sense of how to check your answer independently
actually this isn't even in the ballpark of what I said
I'm talking about problem solving strategy and you're talking about credentials
why are trig graphs so insane
@prime steeple do you still need help with this?
okay
because i have quiz tmr and i cant understand this
do you know what a geometric sequence is?
yes
okay, what is a geometric sequence?
we don't give out solutions
find a1?
anyway, i'm questioning you because i want to find out where exactly you are stuck
or have you decided to forfeit the previous question and will instead demand help with this one first?
yes i need help with this
so you no longer care about the geometric sequence question?
yes maybe
so is that a yes or is that a maybe?
maybe
so you have no recollection of seeing such a diagram before?
no
can u just tell me what is this
like
what is the teracher trying to explain
hm
maybe those words could remind you of something
explain more?
there's nothing more to explain, really...
is it a common multiple?
your last question makes zero sense lol
k
you're reading too much into this.
with so little detail and such a barebones (literally) diagram there is really nothing more that can be said
You need to post the complete problem statement if you want help.
You cant drop in on your doctor, show them a picture of the sidewalk, and say "I need help with this". They're not gonna know wtf you are talking about. And neither are we.
BTW the geometric sequence question was solvable, she was just asking what you remembered because she knows what you need to remember to solve that problem
yeah but somalicock is above such peasant methods
I feel like this account is a troll account designed solely to get people to say somalicock
Lol!
I'm not ready to make that judgement because a disturbing number of students on the internet post incomplete math questions with no context. Asking complete questions is a skill we might take for granted
You might be right, @LunasongtheSupergay!
We should ask @JoeBiden or @XiJinping
shouldn't it be 2^3 and 2? how did they distrbuite the 3rd power to the 2 and it became 2^2
$\left( \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \right)^3 =\left( \frac{\sqrt{2}^3}{2^3} \right) =\left( \frac{\sqrt{2}\cdot \sqrt{2}\cdot \sqrt{2}}{2\cdot 2\cdot 2} \right) =\left( \frac{2 \sqrt{2} }{2 \cdot 2^2} \right) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2^2}$
peaceGiant
how do i graph Quadratic Functions
m(2)=?
thats everything that was given
yes, what is m(2)
7
32
n(32)?
36
congrats
then how come i got that wrong
my module said the answer was 38
thank you very muchhh
38 is not right
ill probably just suck it up and understand that the module can be wrong sometimes
thank you very much tho. didnt clearly understand it.
The graph is in radians of course. I know the formula y = Atrig(Bx-C)+D. Where A is amplitude, B is the Period, C is Phase Shift, and D is vertical shift.
What I don't know, is what x/2 could possibly be.
x/2 is the product of 1/2 and x
Ah, yeah, that would make sense. Thank you.
How would I turn 12/sin60 into it's radical form? The answer is 13.856406460551, but I have no idea how to turn this into it's radical form (8sqrt3).
Assuming it's possible because all the answer choices are whole numbers lol.
Did you ever learn what sin(60) is?
apply that and simplify the fraction
simplify further
$$= \frac{12}{\br{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}}$$
ℝamonov
Just to ask, is it that you considered doing this but thought it wasn't allowed?
I considered this, but got stuck on 24/sqrt3.
24/sqrt(3) is progress, and there is a technique called rationalization of the denominator
Yea :/, so there is.
Forgot all about it because I had to learn it from the internet instead of my teacher.
Teacher didn't teach it?
Nope. Not a lick. And then decides to toss all whole numbers into the answer choices.
I think she assumed this because most current day calculators tell you 12/sin(60) in radical form already, so I can't blame her.
I personally don't have one of those calculators.
Anyway, I'd get 24sqrt(3) over 3. Then just divide the 24 by the 3 and get 8sqrt(3).
Pretty much
Thank you.
Natural draft cooling towers are often shaped as hyperboloids of revolution. Each vertical cross section of these towers is a hyperbola. Suppose that a natural draft cooling tower has the cross section below. Suppose the tower is 450 feet wide at the base, 275 feet wide at the top, and 220 feet at its narrowest point (which occurs 330 feet above the ground.) Determine the height of the tower to the nearest foot.
Need help ^
What is the question?
What have you tried?
After you share the original question, please share the work you have completed so far; this will allow someone to help you with wherever you are stuck with the problem.
Can we pin this somewhere? lol
that is the original question
u are supposed to solve and find the answer
crap
i didnt writei t correctly
here it is
we need to solve
i know the answer is 1
but im not sure how they got 1
I’d put csc and sec in terms of sin and cos and use a sin(90°-x) identity and simplify. And do something similar for the tan and cot thing
I don’t care to work through it but that’s the path I’d take to solving it
another way you could do is to apply product to sum identity and simplify
we haven't learned that yet
i'll take a look into this
@cursive imp what is giving you trouble here?
is it that the equation of motion as written is actually nonsensical if you think about it physically?
(and also that the precision asked for in part b uses the wrong units?)
i think i know how to solve part a but i don’t understand part b.. i got -8.7 as the answer but idk if that’s correct (i substituted x=1 & x=1.01)
the ball is kicked at t=0, not at t=1.
sounds like the nonsensical nature of the question went over your head huh
what .. so u mean i should used h(0) instead of h(1) for iroc
bro shut the fuck up just answer the question next time
- there was no need to be this rude. besides, i very clearly gave an answer of 'yes' to your question.
- please don't call me 'bro'.

why are you being impolite to people helping you
you get a temporary mute for now, but this type of behavior won't get you very far here
I agree with that decision, but I think saying “the nonsensical nature of the problem went over your head” multiple times can definitely be misinterpreted as condescending. I’m not condoning his response, just saying that I understand why he might have been provoked
How do I go about solving part two of this question? (I don't want the answer; I want guidance)
A good showcase of an effect of “When good teaching leads to bad results” (I just read that paper yesterday!)
oh? can you link the paper?
Sure give me a couple of minutes
http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/TiMER/Schoenfeld (1988) Good Teach Bad Results-2.pdf @willow bear got the link
ty
What's the formula for compound interest if the money is withdrawn earlier? I forgot.
say:
5000 for 6 months with 4.4% yearly
i guess i just halve it?
If there is a withdrawal, I'm pretty sure you can just decrease the balance according to the amount withdrawn
see
5000 for 6 months with 4.4% yearly
we have a yearly interest, but the money is withdrawn in 6 months
how do I calculate it?
normally the formula is
A = P(1+r/n)^nt
for:
A = amount
P = principal
r = interest rate in decimal
n = number of times interest is compounded per t
t = time
If t = 1 year, then n = 2 times
there's nothing said about n, though?
we only care about whatever is left at the end of 6 months
i mean
i suppose it is implied that n = 2
but you still have to calculate only the amount that is left at the end of the 6 months
Oh, if this is a rate at which money is withdrawn, then I imagine the rate would be negative
Could you please expalin to me what don't you understand?
The money is deposited for 6 months
The interest rate is 4.4% yearly
You have to calculate how much money will you have given this interest rate after 6 months
I'm asking what's the formula
A = P(1+r/n)^nt
for:
A = amount
P = principal
r = interest rate in decimal
n = number of times interest is compounded per t
t = time
I think this is right, but idk why you're withdrawing money (usually these types of equations don't involve withdrawal)
Do you have a picture of the original problem?
The original problem isn't in English. I have translated it
the principal is 5000
the time is 6 months
the interest rate is 4.4% yearly
calculate the amount after 6 months
Oh okay
In which case there is no withdrawal
Just compounding interest: no money is being removed from the bank account
If it's compounded yearly, then after 6 months, the balance won't change.
The balance will first change (in other words, be different than the initial amount of 500) after 1 year (or 12 months)
in such case the question doesn't make sense
so it must be something else
but regardless
thank you for your help
i'll ask my teacher about it
simple interest or compound interest?
Mosh
$a-b = -(b-a)$
EndTimes
@bleak lance that's how you find the zero
for the number line
my teacher just plotted random points that’s greater than 4/3 and less than 4/3 ?
then she use points like 2 and 3 using driscrimnate equation?
I would have to say this isn't the best way to present the solution to the problem
even though it is pretty step-by-step
There is too much "process" here and it obscures the logic
Hi
Could I get help with creating conic sections equations
<@&286206848099549185>
I am actually here to learn calc but good luck
Key 𐂂
I got that for the circle
its center is (-1,7)
my bad its supposed to be (x-1)
The r=2
$(x+1)^2+(y-7)^2=4$
Key 𐂂
my bad. thats the equation i wrote
or =2^2 but 4 works too
Im pretty sure that is correct, nut i really don't know about the parabola
I don't have to find the directrix or the Focus
<@&286206848099549185>
Oh wait
0iq
I just have to work backwards
Thanks for helping me
, me
No problem
Hi can someone tell me what i did wrong pls
@viral copper your numerator has higher degree than the denominator
so to do a pfd you would need to do long division first
i.e. express (x^3+2x^2-1)/(x^2+x-6) as the sum of a polynomial and a proper fraction
where 'proper fraction' means a fraction where the degree of the top is strictly less than that of the bottom
ohh ok
tysm appreciate it
Did you try to find the common denominator?
how do you solve this by hand?
That's equal to log2(12^2)+log2(5^3)-log2(15)-log2(150)
which is equal to log2(12^2*5^3) - log2(15/150)
which is equal to log2(10*(12^2 * 5^3))
Apparently not
the answer comes out as 3 on my cas
but that doesn't equal 3
equating the question and your answer returns false
do you know your log laws?
specifically stuff like power law, sum to product, difference to quotient
(the other person messed up the order of operations)
what is the formula of finding chord in a parabola?
there is no formula and you should not look for one
or are you expected to do problems like this in under 10 seconds?
I already graph the parabola
if you're able to find the focus of the parabola then i fail to see what could trouble you about this
my problem is that I could not find the other endpoint of the chord
have you found the focus?
so have you found the equation of the chord?
the other endpoint of the chord is (8,16/3)
and i could not find the other endpoint
no
okay why not
it goes through (8, 16/3) and the focus.
and it is a straight line
why were you unable to find the equation of the chord?
that sounds like a thinly veiled "fuck off" to me
How do I get a formula of a function from a partially filled table, i.e. (lhs is x, rhs is y) 0 = -2, 2 = 0, 3=5 4=9 7=12
Do I just guess or is there some method to it
Function f assigns every natural number n the number of digits required to write it in decimal form, e.g. f(7285) = 4
Give all the arguments n < 3000 for which the following equality holds f(n+1) = f(n) +1
No idea how to do it
Function g assigns every number x in [-5, 6] the smallest integer n such that 3n > x
What's the root of the function?
The answer given by the book is -3, but I think it's also -2 and -1
@surreal crest
you can't, unless you have some more info about the function beyond what the table gives you.
f(n+1) = f(n) + 1 means that n+1 requires one more digit to write than n. when do you think this happens?
You can use lagrange polynomial interpolation.
And just hope
That it's right
(it won't be)
so the book claims -3 is the only solution of g(x)=0?
it says that
the increasing function f: {0,1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} -> C has been described by the following table.
a) fill it
b) find the roots
c) find the argument a for which f(f(a)) + 2 = 0
Also zoosmell pooplord is better than troll
C?
it means Z
Polish?
yeah
so you are told that it is increasing.
sometimes C is used instead of Z
C isn't used for Z anywhere beyond highschool
Infuriating
so do I jsut guess it?
check Zs
oh right
and you're told the values of f at everything else

