#precalculus
1 messages Ā· Page 289 of 1
If it explains how the function is differentiable at zero
not once did i mention epsilon or delta
(f(x)-f(0))/x has a limit as x goes to zero and that limit is 0
I don't get it
how do you get that limit for the function bounces from one point to the other
you can apply the squeeze theorem
that's the easiest way to show that this limit exists
okay i'll see that
does anyone know how to do this?
I know how to do it with just the arcsin, but I'm confused now that arccos was added it
*in
$\tan(\theta-\varphi)$ and use compound angle
moshill1
@noble plume
With the arccos function, you can refer to that as if it was a cosine function but instead of the angle being the value, you just put the adjacent over the hypotenuse ratio.
I'm kind of confused
tan(theta - p) and use compound angle?
yes
would the triangle be in quadrant 4
since you can easily find what tan(sin^1(4/5)) and tan(cos^-1(5/13)) is
It really depends on the angle
so am I supposed to find those two separately and subtract??
yes, then use compound angle for tan(A-B)
$\tan(A-B)=\frac{\tan(A)-\tan(B)}{1+\tan(A)\tan(B)}$
moshill1
I'll try it š
If you construct the triangles you'll see that this holds true
$\arcsin \frac{4}{5}=\arctan \frac{4}{3}$
osmium
$\arccos \frac{5}{13}=\arctan \frac{12}{13}$
osmium
$\arctan(A)-\arctan(B)=\arctan\frac{A-B}{1+AB}$
osmium
then you can apply this formula which you can derive by yourself
and since both the angles lie in first quadrant you can simply plug in the values
just letting you know this
Draw a diagram for 6
For 7, Solve for sin(Īø) and use double angles
- Split cos^2(2x) into cos(2x)*cos(2x)
- Use half angles
@noble plume if you donāt know there identities you should learn them
I solved #7 for now š
a,b, and c
trying to do 8 atm
Good work
ty š
I'm sorry for bothering u, but do you have any idea what property I need to look up for #8?
I've been searching, and still can't find it rip
Itās all good
Do you know any double angles?
Double angles are just nice angle sum ones
Like $\cos^2{2x}$ is just $\cos{2x}\cdot\cos{2x}$
AyeWaddup
And $\cos{2x}=\cos{(x+x)}$
AyeWaddup
Plug that into the cos sum identity you get $\cos^2(x)-\sin^2(x)$
AyeWaddup
Which can also be written as $2\cos^2(x)-1$ or $1-2\sin^2(x)$
AyeWaddup
Using the Pythagorean trig identity
tysm!
so 2cos^2(x) or 1-2sin^2(x) is the answer?
isn't the cos supposed to be to the first power
Yo anyone in here able to help me with a question
If you had posted the question, sure.
hate to ask, but does anyone understand limits with square roots lol?
i can't seem to understand when the sign is supposed to be positive or negative depending on the where the square root is and which infinite its going to
@here
i believe i can break it down to:
sqrt ( 1 - 0 ) divided by 3 + 0
but i don't understand how to radical affects the sign of the equation as well as the limit to infinity
for square roots just apply it to the highest term
so like the top is approximately x^4
because sqrt(x^8)
sqrt(x^8) = x^4
yea
how come sometimes it becomes like: x^2 = - sqrt (x^4)
let me see if i can find an example
@bitter nova
even tho x^5 = sqrt(x^10) --> why does it become negative?? is that because we're finding the limit to negative infinity
that's a really weird way lol
x^5= - sqrt(x^10) because the square root is always positive
and a negative to the 5th power is negative, so you add a minus to make the signs the same
I'd look at it as a minus sign from the x^5 on top, even though that explanation puts it on the bottom
by adding a negative in front of the sqrt, it makes it negative i understand, but ig my question is why am i adding the negative
because the sqrt is in the denom??
uh it's trying to divide by x^5
and to convert it to something similar to the bottom you make it like sqrt(x^10)
because they're equal
but x^5 is negative so you add a minus sign
is there a rule as to why x^5 is negative? would x to the power of an even make it positive?
x^5 is negative because it's a limit to negative infinity
and 5 is odd
square root is sort of ambiguous because like 2 times 2 equals -2 times -2
then how come in the previous example i posted it was to the negative infinite but i didn't make the sqrt neative
but we chose the sqrt(x) notation to always be positive
the one before had a 3x^4
this one is x^5
like in the end all you need to know is the sign of the final limit
so like x^5/sqrt(...) is negative for x-> -inf
and sqrt(...)/3x^4 is positive for x-> -inf
yea x^5 goes negative for x<0
x,x^3,x^5,x^7... work like that
thats a pattern i noticed, when x < 0 ... the y was negative
when the power was odd
so when the power is odd and i'm going to the negative infinite, then my sqrt will be negative
right?
x^13 going to negative infinite would give a negative sign in the fraction because x<0 gives negative values for y
but if the exponent is even then any value would be positive, keeping the fraction positive
yea
Specific Keyboard
hi
um i need help with a question
so i have to determine the value of x
for sin 8pi/23 =sinx
however the catch is that xā 8pi/23
so idk how to solve that
gotcha
i dont know how to do this
@noble plume Do you know about power reducing formulas? The power reduction for cos is (1+cos(2x))/2
yeah, I think I know that, but I can't imply it into the cos^2(2x) š¦
actually, I didn't know that
would this just be cos(5.3), or is the angle something different?
@noble plume I'm not quite sure what that one is asking...It just looks like something that would need to be evaluated, so I'm not really sure. Maybe it's talking about trigonometric form?
maybe, I don't know either rip
@granite crescent This seems like a rotational type of question...For example, say you're solving sin Ļ = sin x, but x can't equal Ļ. If you simply add a full rotation, you're now at 3 Ļ (because a full rotation is 2 Ļ). So, x = 3 Ļ in this case, which would make it at the same angle, but rotationally different so not actually Ļ. Does this help?
can someone help me convert r=6cos(2Īø)sin(2Īø) to rectangular form and explain the process?
i know how to convert polar to rectangular but the 2Īø is really getting me
yes 4.1+1.2=5.3
for 6 you can use sohcahtoa
could you please elaborate
yes
the arcsin(x/y) means that sin(theta) where theta has sides x and y as opposite and hypotenuse (respectively)
so in this case
I have a question : how can I find the derivative of the cubic function from the square function ?
4 is the side opposite and 5 is the hypotenuse
so 3 would be the final leg
and so we have a 345 right triangle
which have specific angles
the same idea holds for arccos(5/13)
so for sohcahtoa we have cah
so arccos(x/y) yields x as the adjacent and y as the hypotenuse
so we have a 5 12 13 triangle
which has specific angles which you can find
visual of Petter's ascendance
ok, I'll try to understasnd what you just said
no, he said no calculator
yeah so what i just said probably wont work hold on
rip š
I'm not using a right triangle to solve it if I do that though right
what is this called in math ? An amount ?${ā2ā¤xā¤2,ā2ā¤yā¤4}$
zeffs
shit you're right
an interval?
Inequality?
Yes
Well you can use the definition of a derivative to find it, $\dv{x} f(x) =\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h}$$
visual of Petter's ascendance
Well you can use the definition of a derivative to find it, $\dv{x} f(x) =\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h}$$
```Compilation error:```! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
$
l.56 \end{document}
I've inserted something that you may have forgotten.
(See the <inserted text> above.)
With luck, this will get me unwedged. But if you
really didn't forget anything, try typing `2' now; then
my insertion and my current dilemma will both disappear.```
lim xā>5
((2/x+3)-1/4)/x-5
I can find it with a calculator easily ig but I wanna know why it equals -1/32
Algabraically
really don't know what you did
Ik
but do you have any ideas on how you can algebraically manipulate the numerator in any way?
I canāt plug in the limit because it equals out to 0/0
I mean ādirect substitutionā
Iāll use the right terminology
yeah that's the first thing you usually want try out when encountering a limit.
but i'm not talking about that
i'm talking about algebraic manipulation.. are you able to come up with any ideas to algebraically manipulate the numerator?
,rccw
When I multiply 2/x+3, does that multiply the denominator by (x+3) as well?
Honestly, I think Iām probably going about this the wrong way.
Bots...
ty
Ty guys
Nvm
no, you want to make mathematically valid steps, and you can't just multiply $\frac{2}{x+3}-\frac14$ by $x+3$ just because you want to. yes, the idea you had is what we want, to do common denominator, but that is not how we want to do it. instead of pulling out a $(x+3)$ in the numerator out of nowhere, think of multiplying essentially by 1, which is mathematically valid step as you are not changing the value of the expression by multiplying it by 1. Focusing only on the numerator we have: $$\frac{2}{x+3}\cdot \overbrace{\color{green}{\frac44}}^{1}-\frac14\cdot \overbrace{\color{blue}{\frac{x+3}{x+3}}}^{1}$$ and this way you can use $\frac{a}{b}+\frac{c}{b}=\frac{a+c}{b}$ to do common denominator.
2-1 over (x-5)(x+3)(4)
Alšdium
Iāve never really been good at working with fractions like that. Where you have multiple fractions in the same equation
But thank you for taking the time to explain it to me
Making the numerator have common denominators makes more sense to me anyways than what my friend tried to explain
i'm glad to hear
now, are you able to simplify: $$\frac{2}{x+3}\cdot {\color{green}{\frac44}}-\frac14\cdot {\color{blue}{\frac{x+3}{x+3}}}$$
Alšdium
good job.
but use proper parenthesis () to indicate what's the numerator and denominator, like this:
8/( 4x+12***)*** -( x+3***)/(*** 4x+12***)***
in plain text, \verb|a+b/c| actually implies $a+\frac{b}{c}$ instead of $\frac{a+b}{c}$
Alšdium
and now, try to simplify further from: $$\frac{8}{4x+12}-\frac{x+3}{4x+12}$$ considering once again $\frac{a}{c}+\frac{b}{c}=\frac{a+b}{c}$
Alšdium
Itād be (8 - x + 3) / (4x + 12)
almost.
be very careful with the $\color{red}{-}$ in front of the second fraction, this is actually a very common mistake in algebra and you may want to start avoiding it now: $$\frac{8}{4x+12}{\color{red}{-}}\frac{x+3}{4x+12}$$ $$\frac{8{\color{red}{-}}(x+3)}{4x+12}$$
your mistake was not putting () around x+3, in short.
Alšdium
Now it turns into: (8-(x+3)) ÷ (4x² -8x - 60)
wait why is it 4x²-8x-60?
Doesnāt this still have the x - 5 underneath it?
Because we only make the numerators have common denominators
.
yeah we do.
$\lim_{x\to 5}\frac{\frac{8-(x+3)}{4x-12}}{x-5}$
Alšdium
yeah but the common denominator is 4x-12 not any other
when writing up the actual steps remember to always add the "lim" part until you've actually evaluated the limit.
but yeah, this is what we are at right now.
are you able to simplify 8-(x+3)?
ok i see what you're doing, whenever you are doing simplification, usually you want to keep it as (x-5)(4x+12).
ok, so i shouldn't simplify that much
no, it's about leaving it in the form that is more easily simplifiable.
can you please answer my questions?
it's not +5
it's 8 - (x+3) with x being 5 which simplifies to zero.
yeah. +3
8 - (5+3) ==> 0
don't go too quick.
ok
Ahhhh
it turns into 8-x+3 because there is a -1 in front of the parenthesis
i completely forgot about that lol
is that what you're talking about
so it's -x +5
no, be aware of distributing - properly, 8-(x+3)=8-x-3=5-x
yeah.
reminding you what we have right now:
$\lim_{x\to 5}\frac{\color{green}{-x+5}}{{\color{green}{(x-5)}}(4x+12)}$
(-x+5)/((x-5)(4x+12))
Alšdium
idk how to write in the language for the bot
can you notice something?
they're going to cancel out aren't they
yeah, it will end up cancelling but right now we can't.
(-x+5)/(x-5) isn't exactly 1
can you algebraically manipulate (-x+5) in a certain way so that we can cancel it with (x-5)?
let me emphasise this:
-1(x-5)
Whoops, wrong sign
are you able now to cancel and plug in 5?
Sorry for taking sm time and having you guide me thru it but it really means a lot to me
for the record, i'd recommend reviewing algebra specifically fractions/manipulating them, you are going to need them.
don't be sorry for taking time, that's totally fine, you're welcome.
also, I solved #9, but I'm not sure if the sin, cos, and tan are + or -
is complex numbers regarding modulus and argument considered precalculus?
yes
These are what I got for 8 and 9
I'm not sure if I got either one correct, actually think I got both incorrect
hi i really need help iām failing my math class rn and thereās 3 weeks left of school and iām a senior and itās the only thing thatās gonna stop@me from graduating
does anyone have a help video or soemthing that can help me with this
Quiz 2 
yeah iām not asking anyone to do it for me i just need a tutorial video or something so i can do it myself
if it matters that much iāll just send a different problem on a hw assignment
So for the quotation rule right?
in the formula of
Can you use v and u interchangeably
forexample for the question such as
can x-1 be v as well instead of x+1
Wait so in the proof, it was using turning the denominator into v(x)^-1 which means that the denominator must be the v
yes the bottom function is v
hey, can anyone help me figure out how to get the equation for the parabola from the graph?
can you show the graph?
I'd use vertex form, y = a(x - h)^2 + k. You know where the vertex is, at the point (h, k). You know where a is positive or negative based on whether the parabola curves upwards or downwards respectively. The only annoying part is figuring out a, which you can do by plugging in x = h+1 (whatever h is). You know which y value this should be equal to from the graph, and you'll get a very nice equation which tells you a in terms of y and k.
(then if you need to convert from vertex form back to standard ax^2 + bx + c form, just FOIL (x-h)^2 and simplify)
any self-learnining course you know is good? edx, coursera, udemy?
I personally like coursera
it has a lot of free courses
(not everything is free though)
udemy has more paid courses than coursera, but the quality is good
however, I'm not familiar with edx, I'll check it out
@potent drift
I have signed up for two in EdX - algebra-like there seem to be more (or at least more structured!) - let me know if you see any interesting @clever pecan pls
thx for the suggestion
Do the negative three in the numerator and denominator cancel out first?
Plugging in equals zero so direct substitution doesnāt work
<@&286206848099549185>
you get a 0/0 situation
This leads to L'Hopital's Rule
Note: when differentiating the numerator, expand the polynomial and use the power rule
@pure dragon this help?
you dont actually need L'hopital like it suggests
How can I graph this
First I'd find x intercepts and y intercept
Can anyone help with this please?
I tried evaluating it and trying to simplify it but its even more complicated, any tips?
not legible unfortunately
@mild swan it's the limit as x approaches infinity of $$x^2\left(e^{2/x}-e^{2/(x+1)}\right)$$
nas
ā * 0 situation i see
maybe bring the x^2 in the numerator into a 1/x^2 in the denominator and try lhopitals
that would definitely work, sadly lhopitals is not accepted in our education system
rip
hmm
can you maybe look at the exponents, create common denominators, and then factor?
I didn't really understand your point
if you try to rewrite 2/x and 2/(x+1) so they have the same denominator, then maybe you can factor something out
like rewrite 2/x as $\frac{2x+2}{x^2 + x}$
Lighthearted Sand Crab
and like rewrite 2/(x+1) as $\frac{2x}{x^2 + x}$
Lighthearted Sand Crab
Maybe you can factor out an $e^{\frac{1}{x^2+x}}$
Lighthearted Sand Crab
i have no idea
lemme try this myself
wait, what if you split it up into two limits
distribute the x^2
not working for me
Same! this is really confusing
idk which grows/decreases faster: x^2 or e^(1/x)
tempted to use lhopitals or desmos bu there's gotta be a way
what was the original problem?
got a picture?
wait nvm lol it was just evaluate the limit
were you given any other information?
Anyway, the result will definitely be positive since $e^{\frac{1}{x}} > e^{\frac{1}{x+1}}$ as x goes to infinity.
Lighthearted Sand Crab
from desmos, the limit equals 2 but i can't figure out any way to come up with such result
not at all
oof
probably lhopitals
that's the only way i can think of doing this limit
try asking in maybe #calculus
double angle formula for sin in reverse
3sin(10x), you should then get.
what is the square root of -1+\sqrt(3i)
so there are two ways you could do this:
#1 set sqrt( -1+ sqrt(3)i ) = a+bi, square both sides, match real and imaginary parts to make a system of equations, and solve for a and b
#2 convert -1+sqrt(3)i to polar form, then halve the argument and take the square root of the modulus to get a new number in polar form which you then convert back to rectangular (a+bi) form
ugh thats ugly you'll have to figure out sqrt(3i) in rectangular form first
its not that ugly since the angle of -1+sqrt(3)i is pretty nice
oh
i was calling the question ugly
so yeah the method is to use one of dans methods to get sqrt(3i) then you have sqrt(-1+whatever that is) which you'll have to use one of those methods again to find
,rotate
guys i need help on a simple problem https://i.gyazo.com/thumb/1200/5dc1f5a8c99ccd716f0878c452d725bf-png.jpg
@late gull do you know the sum angle formulas?
no i forget
anyone in here able to help me with a question
okay this algebra so far is correct
except, since it looks like you want the \textbf{general} solution, you'll need to write $$3x = \tan^{-1}(2) + k\pi, \quad k \in \bZ$$
I dont know how to find all the x's
Ann
I understand that
but there are multiple x's
yes, and?
does that somehow create a magical forcefield in front of you that's stopping you from dividing both sides by 3?
f(3+x)=(3+x)^2= 9+6x+x^2 f(3)=9 => the limit goes to 0 is (6x+x^2)/x
that is 0/0, we can apply l'hopital and we get lim 6+2x/1 which is 6
integration
integrating the second derivative will get you the first order derivative and you can find the constant as you have those conditions there
after you found the first derivative you integrate again, find the constant and thats ur f(x)
integration goes brr
np
I have something like this but i feel that tan7theta does not equal y/x because that would be tan theta
try multiplying both sides of that equation by r then converting to cartesian @echo condor
so rtanr=rtan7theta
i meant r=7theta
sorry for some reason i thought that was sin theta on the right there
youre kinda almost there youll have sqrt(x^2+y^2) on the left and u know theta is arctan(y/x)+kpi, cuz tan is periodic
yeah but tan7theta cant be y/x cause tantheta is y/x
Given (x-1) (x-3) ^2(x-k) <=0. Find sum of all values of k such that this inequality has exactly 20 integer solutions.
I am getting the answer as 2 but the answer given is 3 . Can someone please tell how to solve this
was this the original problem?
or this
which base is larger?
log(x)
if you graph it it's the opposite?
ln x will grow faster bc it takes quicker to get to 2.5ish than 10
?
ln(x) increase faster?
yeah
think about it like this
e^x grows slower than 10^x right?
since e is smaller than 10
Yes
logarithms are inversions of exponential functions
so you invert almost everything about the function
since first its that e^x is slower
and we invert it
its now that ln(x) grows quicker
Ok maybe I didn't understand over the interval (0,1)
wait
over (0,1) might be a different story then
i think the inversion rule really only applies for a positive y
but when its negative u itd change
ah
alright
well now we gotta think about it like this
okay
so we said that 10 is bigger than e right?
Yes
but remember than when we have a negative as the expoenent its a fraction
Yes
so taking reciprocals is the same
if 10 is bigger than e and we take the reciprocal
then 1/10 is smaller than 1/e
Ok
but overall 1/10 is farther from 10 than 1/e is from e
so 1/10 would have to grow faster to reach 10 at the same point as 1/e
so then log(x) grows quicker over that domain
but then for the (1, infty) part u just do the one i talked about earlier
so that should be all u need
I'd look at how the numbers are being added successively
Does anyone know the best book on Integral calculus?
42, 47, 52
why?
+3 +5 +3 pattern
Last iteration was the last +3
So you would continue from the top
that doesn't work for every term in the sequence
23, 26, 29
oh i get you
hmm ok bro my bad
Nah ur good
actually i thought there was a repetition of 5
wrong answer tho
i will try to focus on my thinking again
no pal actually i felt in confusion
even that was a basic.
Depends on which country and the topics you need
anywhere and on integration
Definite integral or indefinite,Are you clear with indefinite ?
both will be good!
is there any book like that?
not pretty good with indefinite
Joseph edwards integral calculus is a good book which you can try
sure, thanks!
A Treatise On The Integral Calculus With Applications, Examples And Problems
Joseph Edwards
this one?
@fringe raft
Thereās another book titled integral calculus for beginners you can look into that if youāve not enough practice
ok bro thanks!
Hey
Not sure is this fits here but
Is good understanding of algebra I and some basic trig enough for precalc then calc?
probably.
Okay thanks
You can use the rational roots theorem to get the roots originally
i know nothing about that
But since they give you solutions, you could just plug in to see which ones are solutions
neither did this course said anything about it.
yeah i was thinking the same but then what's the point of this exercise?
I'm surprised that you would get this question without having done RRT
That's the usual way for solving cubics
Use RRT to find one rational root, then do long division to get the quadratic factor, then find the solutions of the quadratic
Yes, that's right
The rational roots theorem just tells you which numbers to try at the start
is an advanced concept?
No
Google to see it in action
Basically it tells you something about all rational roots of a polynomial
ok
So that it limits the numbers you have to check to those that satisfy the condition
For all rational roots p/q, p divides the constant term and q divides the leading coefficient
So you can just write out the factors of the constant term and leading coeff, and then divide them one by one and test all those numbers.
All other rational numbers won't be roots so you don't have to try them
looking at the wiki atm.
it's an intro course to calculus on coursera
it had a lot of good reviews
so i decided to try it
If you don't eliminate any numbers to test, there are infinitely many to try. With RRT, you limit yourself to a finite number of numbers to test
What's the course?
this one*
i really want to get to week 3 with good base understanding.
I will audit it now to check the content lol
I'm sure it's fine
Just learn the RRT to help yourself
Two integers are relatively prime if their gcd is 1
It means they don't share any factors except 1 and -1 which are always common factors of any 2 numbers.
No
okay so the leading coefficient in my case is not 1.
so i need to find factors of p and q that are relatively prime?
and that's all the numbers i should be plugging to find the root?
oh wow that worked like a charm lmao
amazing stuff.
thank you.
it works for all degrees of polynomials?
Yep
All degrees
Ofc there can still be irrational roots (or complex roots), but this will give you all rational roots
Could I check my answer I got for a question here, or should I go to the questions section?
(because the question section is pretty packed)
just #7, had to find the value of K

i know i'm several hours late because sleep
but the problem statement is incomplete. you want to find the value of k under what conditions?
its ok, i got a friend to help me out lol
Im so scared to take pre calculus next year
It's not too bad don't worry
whats the notation for x is the element of all real numbers such that x cannot equal (more than one number)
i know for one number it would be
{XER|x=/=(whatever number)}
ya but i mean when there is more than one number that x cannot equal
like lets say x cant be a or b
how do you write that
moshill1
x cant be a or b, and a and b arent the same
ie x cant be 2 distinct values, but can be everything else in R
okay so what if it was like x cannot equal 1 and 2
you dont need to say 1 and 2 arent the same right
it would just be {xer|x=/=1,2}?
okok
yes
hey!
im in desperate need
of help with this question
this is a no calculator
question
for the record
moshill1
yeah
i got that far
but how do i find the values for those logs?
thats what im stuck on
3=6/2
i see
and you know what log 6 and log 2 are
moshill1
where did you get 1.3?
oopd
o mean
sorry i was looking at the wrong one
so log7^3 is 0.45
and log 7^8 is
1.4?
?
$\log_7{4}\approx 0.7$
moshill1
right?
reading
moshill1
but by log laws, $0.5\log_7{4}=\log_7(4^{0.5})$
moshill1
yes
moshill1
so you need log_7(8)
but 8 = 2^3
so multiply both sides by 3
$\log_7{8}\approx 1.05$
moshill1
same logic of multiplying both sides by 0.5
cause I can use log laws to get 2^3 inside the log
$\log_7{2}\approx 0.35\implies 3\log_7{2}\approx 1.05$
moshill1
i see
ok that makes sense
so how does this help us find the orginial values we need to find
we found log_7(8) correct
$\log_7{3}=\log_7\left(\frac{6}{2}\right)=\log_7{6}-\log_7{2}\approx .9-.35$
moshill1
you already have log_7(8)
sorry bro this shit
is like
a forigen language
to me
its just this one problem on my entire damn worksheet
do you think you could write this all down on a piece of paper so i can see your work?
its juts so confusing tracking all of this
im sorry man
it's basically how can you make numbers out of 6 4 and 11 given multiplication and division
yeah
ill try it again
thank you for your help
i have the answer
but
im still figuring out
how she got it
(my teacher)
yeah no worries
im gonna try it again
ill lyk if i need help, thank you man
hmm so i went and did the entire thing @sick steppe
my final answer was -0.35
i got log7(3) is 0.7
log7(2) is 0.35
how did you get that?
yes
ok so
from there
i did log7(2) + log 7(3) = 1.05
i know the value of log 7^2 is 0.35
2*3 isnt 8
yeah, so you'd get 3log_7(2)=1.05, which is back where we started
$\log_7{3}=\log_7{6}-\log_7{2}$ as I previously said
moshill1
and you know both log 6 and log 2
cause 6/2=3
i see
and log laws
so $\log_7{3}\approx 0.55$
moshill1
yes
,w calculate log_7(3/8)
i just get confused witth log rules
thank you
yo
@sick steppe
could you go through this one with me as well
im sorry
yes
cbrt(8)=2, but yes
so log 2 is 0.3
yes
yes
ok yes that worked
,w calculate log_9(4)
thank you
@sick steppe hey so
i thought i had this one
but i was clsoe
i don't know where my mistake is so im just gonna tell you what i did
first thing i did was find log(3)
i got 0.55
after that i noticed 2^5 is 32
so i went to find log(2)
i got 0.35 for log(2)
i then multipled that by 5
and got 1.75
and from there did 1.75 - 0.55
and got 1.2
but the answer is 1.1
@sick steppe you have any idea where i went wrong?
,w calculate log_8(2)
,w calculate log_8(11)
,w calculate log_8(3)
,w calculate log_8(2)
Is this a place I can find someone to help me understand concepts I am trying to learn in my course?
It's more like you can ask for homework help.
Determine which quadrant the terminal side would lie given the following information: sin(theta) = -21/29; cot(theta) < 0
^ can someone help with this?
Would appreciate
@plain turtle What have you thought so far?
i mean...
1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... is a divergent series
that's the issue
you're subtracting infinity from infinity
and even the alternating harmonic series, ie what you start with, isn't absolutely convergent, so extra care needs to be taken in manipulating those
@vale basin
I found the answer already but still thanks š
my class is actually calculus, not precalculus but i feel like this is a pretty basic concept and #calculus is busy lol so..
i did a FORTY rectangle approximation and its not close enough to the answer, in the calculator it calculated 7021.7143 for me
is there a better algebraic way to solve this instead of rectangle approximation? i didnt really pay enough attention in class and my finals tomorrow š¬
Wew Lads Tbh
well another issue there
we're not allowed to use calculators, we have to do everything in excel
ill figure out how to put it in excel ig
But integrating it is so easy
ive prob opened the textbook twice the whole semester tbh i just figured stuff out on trial and error
ik its stupid but
im lazy and its been working
$\int x^n \dd{x} = \frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}$
visual of Petter's ascendance
If u have a coefficient before the exponent u just multiply the answer by it since it isn't affected by x
@stone vortex so u should just integrate it
assuming n!=-1
jolimath
Try 0, 90, 180, 270 to start ...
<@&286206848099549185> this problem was never answered
fā tells us about the concavity of the curve if itās >0 then itās concave and if itās <0 itās convex. The derivative tells about the slope at a particular point
wait which one is concave up and concave down
What
For concave up fā >0
Think of it looking at a cup from the top Concave up looks like a cup
the question is, say there are 5 break out rooms, 4 people per break out rooms, and you have 9 friends. whats the probability of getting into a break out room with one or more of your friends.
i got ~83% and i just want to know if its correct or wrong
so ~83% would be wrong
P(room with one or more of your friends)=1-P(room with none of your friends)
each room has 4 people
20 people in the class
10 non-friends, you, and 9 friends
so lets say you're in some room, there will be 3 other people
19 choose 3 total ways to choose 3 other people to form the room
10 choose 3 ways to choose 3 non-friends so that you end up in a room with none of your friends
P(room with none of your friends) =(10C3)/(19C3)
P(room with one or more of your friends)= 1-(10C3)/(19C3)
If n is -1, the integral doesn't follow reverse power rule
Hey guys, Im a highschool student, and i current am struggling at vector geometry. I was wondering had some recommendations on where i could go to get harder geometry vector geometry?
if you are struggling then shouldn't you actually learn the basics ? 
i have lern't the basic....i just need to ensure that by doing harder questions i can ensure that i am prepared for everything in the exam
That doesn't sound like an effective learning strategy.
Try working out your basics first.
If it's a school exam, work through the contents covered in your class through the prescribed textbook.
Khan Academy could be a useful supplement.
I was confused bc I thought u were saying n factorial
n!=1
Yeah
!= means not equal
yes
oh yea i get it now thank you
$\int \frac{2ax+b}{ax^2+bx+c}\dd{x} = \ln{|ax^2+bx+c|} + C$
.itsjustnai
Is this correct?
I assume it is because I've seen it used in a couple of problems, but can someone show me how they got it?
nvm i figured it out
In vectors, How can directions be in degrees
cause angles can be measured in degrees
so degrees replaces left and right
right?
cartesian vectors can be defined by a distance and a rotation
so you rotate however much to look at the destination, then extend there
for example if you want the vector [1,1], you rotate 45 degrees CCW from the pos x axis, then extend to be sqrt(2) away
relearn what irrationals mean
and how to find one between 2 numbers
full context of that ?
@pseudo furnace how familiar are you with angle sum, angle difference, and double-angle identities?
Not very
Itās a new unit
This isnāt even for a grade tho, I just donāt want my teacher to think Iām an idiot lol
@willow bear
hrm
okay. let's see.
since i'd like to know exactly where your knowledge gap lies, here's a simpler question:
cos(t) = 0.6 and t is in quadrant 4; find the value of sin(t)
would you be able to do this one?
Unfortunately no
mkay
okay, are you at least familiar with the pythagorean identity?
i.e. sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
Ya
okay
why don't you try applying it to this question i posted then
you'll need to learn how to do it in order to tackle the more complicated ones you've posted above.
...welp
Sry:(
i mean, ok, you can look up the relevant trig identities on your own time since i gave you their names
in this message
Just multiply two arbitrary, length 1 complex numbers.
Real parts a, c are cosine and then b, d are sine.
Ditto for the expression after multiplying.
(a + bi)(c + di) = (ac - bd) + (ad + bc)i
-->
x = (ac - bd)
cos(r + t) = cos(r)cos(t) - sin(r)sin(t)
&
yi = (ad + bc)i
sin(r + t) = cos(r)sin(t) + sin(r)cos(t)
i doubt that they're familiar with complex numbers at this point
Eh fair enough.
yeah no i am not sure where the 43 comes from
someone else should be able to help
Is a continuous and decreasing/increasing function f always a bijective function?
I think it has to be strictly monotonic and then only it can be a bijection
Can someone confirm?
@shut shuttle don't really need continuous. just strictly monotone is sufficient
Okay thanks
@shut shuttle when you say a bijection, what are you using as the codomain?
It's definitely injective
But it depends on what your codomain is whether it is subjective
For example, $f: \bR \to \bR, f(x) = e^x$ is strictly increasing but not bijective because the codomain $\bR$ does not equal the range. If you instead made it $\bR \to (0, \infty)$ then it would be bijective.
Lunasong the Supergay
Looks good
no way to isolate x tho?
... Can you isolate x in 2x = x + 1?
Here 2 is just replaced with ln(6) but you do the same thing
I don't know what the codomain is, I just know that the range is R and f is a continuous and decreasing function. Can I deduce that f is a bijective function?
You know that the range is R?
$f: \bR \to \bR$
And by range do you mean image
Schrƶdinger's cat
