#precalculus
1 messages · Page 80 of 1
If zero
Oh right
Yes brotato chips
what county are you from? your asian right
It just wasn't written as c
perhaps are you Chinese
Why do you think I'm Chinese?
Yeah it was for explaination
idk initial guess
Alright, thanks
Beacuse asian means chinese right ?
I'm not full Chinese, just part
No, Asia is a continent
Not a country
I'm from Asia too bro
Are you Chinese?
No
I'm from "dond dell me what to do "
do you shake your head while explaining?
Yeah man it's an indian gene problem
woah
Are you Chinese?
is it true you guys hate pakistan?
Bro come in #chill
wait is political talk allowed
mb
Bro look honestly I'm not stupid i don't hate
Me hating or loving does not make a god damn difference
It's not a universal thing for a country
Seriously bro
You from the south?
i got a question whats the use of mathematical model and use of euler method and why is it even there what perpose does it serve in college they just teach i wanna know why and how did they make it
yes
Yo gng
How do you get the role “very cool people”?
you have to pay for Nitro and boost this server
or if you can get Nitro for free somehow
Ohhh thanks brotha
Oi @willow skiff @carmine orbit guys you interested in trying physics
no
Send if it aint tedious ill do it
Here
Do you have the solution
No
Send soln

Nah
You do it
Send me the solution when youre done
Ngl doesnt work
Only thing that works is catenary
And if im not wrong ts is from pathfinder
what goes for trying, Once i approximated arch of a cycloid by ellipse ( Lame curve to be specific ) lets see what goes with this
or you can apply the expansion for ln(1+x)
or you can also use LH rule if you wish
suppose you're given lim x to 0 [ln(1+x)]/x. if you first expand ln(1+x) you need not write the terms after x because their contribution to the sum becomes zero in the limit. so you're left with lim x to 0 x/x which is equal to 1 basically
suppose you're given ln(1+5x)/x lim x to 0 once again expand the series and you're left with lim x to 0 5x/x which equates to 5
Yeah, but this is apparently supposed to be done with PRE-calculus tools, which I don't think that series expansion is.
if you don't want to dwell in series expansion, you can always opt for l'hospital
Not pre-calculus either.
if you don't mind me asking, you're not indian right?
No. What does that have to do with anything, though?
here (in inda), we're mostly taught all of this before college/universities. our system is different from other countries so i am not really familiar with the terms calculus, pre-calculus etc.
series expansion and lh rule are the most recommended ways to solve a limit for our curriculum which is why i suggested those here
"Precalculus" is an American term whose precise boundaries I have no good understanding of. But the word only seems to make sense if it excludes things that you need to know about derivatives for.
Nah he is right they are taught series expansion before taylor or maclauren
With PRE calculus
Who is "they"?
they as in indian students i presume
But yeah it still doenst change the fact
another way you could approach this problem i guess is using 1^∞ form of limits
Like they are told to memories series expansion of various functions like sinx e^x
The stuff like functions continuity differentiability limits are considered pre calc
if i remember correctly this is how you solve it
yeah exactly
we were taught inverse trigonometric functions as pre-calculus too
since it pops up a lot in various questions
And stuff like derivatives integration aod etc are considered calculus
@hushed sphinx
So basically he isnt wrong either since expansion is done in calculus
this is stretching the bounds of 'pre-calculus' but you're right, you can do this without actually understanding calculus
just memorise that specific limit and worry about the derivation later in calculus
Fr
this is a nice derivation though without calculus
so by variable substitution, $\lim_{bx \to 0} \frac{\ln(1 + bx)}{bx} = 1$ also
and then it follows
im like 90% done with calculus so yeah
south
to be fair you're never really DONE with calculus but there's this exam im preparing for which actually focuses on some specific types of questions so referring to that, i've covered pretty much everything
I hate JEE culture so much, but if that's where your dreams are, then....
I suppose, if one has defined e as something like the limit of (1+1/n)^n.
I don't understand what is going on in the line with "1^infty", though.
yeah that should just be removed altogether
or clarified as "1^infinity is undefined, so you need to recognise the specific limit"
Jee we get it man
Bahahahah me too so repetitive
not if you're not indian no
What
its not that im fond of it too but we gotta do what we gotta do man
ok yes
my bad
exactly...
ok so if this is pre calculus
is there a calculus channel?
#calculus ok yes lets go
Yeah I have the solution but I don't have it in a vid format and I don't want to see it now because Im not done with the question
And why are you also not trying it
guys i'm not wrong right 
my teacher HAD to have typed that in incorrectly or sum cuz i redid it and got the same thing
we will ignore the handwriting ok 😭 😭
,w equation of line (2,4306), (7,15071)
,calc 2153*12
Result:
25836
yeah probably a typo
Answer is 2000?? Or 0... What does that other part say. Is it abt ai
Answer should be zero
As f(x) has no integers in range
Cuz I'm getting arcos(~1.25), which is not defined
So kinda thinking that function is not defined in any real domain brisky
||2003||?
No
oh wait
final answer ||2001||
0
technically it sohuld be 2000 + 0 but then the question says to put 0 if no values exist
and since no values exist
answer is 0
The answer is not zero damnit
No
its arccos(1.78), but arccos is only valid in the interval [-1,1] right?
so how is the answer not 0\
yesh send once
That's domain
yes its the domian ,range is 0 to pi
No range is like the output no?
Yes but if the domian itself is not satisfied
Range is 0 to π
how can you get the output
they said the output, and the output is not -1 to 1
last resort, graph it
yeh typo
,w plot f(x)= arccos(√(arcsin(sec(ln((2x²+3x+10)/(x²-3x+2))))))
Yeah very well
funny graph
,w plot f(x)= arccos(√(arcsin(sec(log_e((2x²+3x+10)/(x²-3x+2))))))
,w plot f(x)= floor(Re(arccos(√(arcsin(sec(ln((2x²+3x+10)/(x²-3x+2)))))))) from -10 to 10
0's and 1's
Glass feels good today and decided to turn on his brain at the weeken for once
ohnoo
maybe it's the tea
i mean I'm not sure of the answer
composite functions' domain and range are my weakness
man can we really only say something when someone asks? 
i had to provide the context bro
guess what else no one asked
no I'm not gonna do it
Ok bro cul i wasnt serious anyway you guys are cul
What
i know it's very obvious with the emojis and "Js kidding" you're good
your mom
-# I'm not gonna drift further from the math topic cuz it becomes out of topic and mods gonna snipe us
You're right
What's the answer
Umm guys guys
Well I'm not getting the domain in any real interval
@hidden birch @fluid sorrel @median spear
Hmm
Hear me out
Bro I'm really really sorry I was checking wrong answer
what's the actual answer
Ayee
which yt channels are you referring to for such questions @frail lion
It's 0 guys
Random
I go on search
it's easy actually
Finna
always check the domain before going for range
Adds on they have Arrowes us to zero thing in question
If i remember correctly we had to minimize gpe right
so how do u solve it
That should give us cosh
Hold on 🌍
What's gpe?
Gravitational potential energy
What no I don't think so
Broo
Sec will give all real values except (-1,1)
But sin^-1 domain is [-1,1]
Hmmm I need to check as far as my memory goes it was something related to this
So when sec is 1 is only possible case
Bcz other real numbers arsinx won't accept
i mean i based on the graph wolfram gave as last resort
So arsin1 is π/2
I didn't check the graph

i thought sec's range is from 1 to infinity
What's happening here
No no
,w sec function range
Stupid wolfram
,w plot sec x
it's $(-\infty, -1] \cup [1,\infty)$
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
It's all real number except (-1,1)
Okkk
So
√π/2 is SMTH 1.25
That's not in domain of arcosx
So fx range is 0
sorry i forgot the open interval notation for a bit
Answer is 0
ok got it
i actually considered 0 but sam said no at first
after me having 2 mistakes
that's when i used wolfram graph
But at the end it's easy
so what's wrong with wolfram why it did me dirty by giving that graph
U can use normal logic
Idk
i did
I actually was trying to solve it that's why I thought what is this
but sam trolled
Dude chill
for some reason i still trust wolfram
I'm chill
Noooooo
Yeah bro chill leave me now
Trust ur concepts
you chill

I suppose the mistake with wolfram was that it was giving the real part of complex range
Which is not what we need here
Hello
ur username has typo
?

it showed two graphs, blue curves as real part and yellow part as imaginary part. but to be fair I can't be sure how to interpret it
What are the odds i and triaengle know each other
1 in trillions
It's the one

Girl has no work
pretty much unemployed

Damn
Okayy
Anyways the graph
And the results were very not simple
Tan of beta is approximately 1
For this
Ok I tried this by perimeter and got a transcendental equation
And radius of curvature is approximately 14.48…
The closest I could get
is there any way this can be solved on desmos, or js have to algebraically solve it?
you can try on Desmos, but there's an easy way without it
the condition for a slant asymptote is that the numerator has to be 1 degree more than the denominator
so that gives you x^k * x * x has 1 degree more than x^5
cause this is how the function behaves like a linear function, when you take the highest terms of the numerator and denominator
So you basically need only 1 ‘x’ on the numerator
So that means k+2+’1’ = 5
And thus k is 2?
we’re using the definition of the derivative to solve B, does anyone know how to solve? (calculus)
well, start by writing down the limit definition of a derivative
then plug in the function given
also plug in x=3
then just solve the limit?
Exact answers can be found bro
Tan beta 5/(3√3)
Radius of curvature 52/(3√3 )
0.97 and 10 approximately in decimals
Bro the degree above will be k+2 and it should be one more than denominator
K+2=6 ; k=4
is precal hard?
You're forgetting these multiplications @neat path
(k + 2) = 6 instead
Ah, you misinterpreted 1 more: 1 more goes on the right hand side
can someone remind me for limit notation, if it says x->2^-, does it mean approaching from the right or the left
i always mix it up
- is left, + is right
thank you 🙏

As I said earlier I used alternative method
So it’s just an approximation
No, we need numerator 1 more and so k+2=4
For example, 11 is 1 more than 10
So the 1 gets added to the right hand side
11 = 10 + 1
@willow skiff
Do you need any other extra training as a high schooler
I know most things you learn in grade 11
Bro wot
Ok
And a linear function gives a slant line
Yes generally
But what about answer bro the second one was a lil wrong
Yk one more thing
When ya divide these both polynomials by long division, the quotient you'll get will be your asymptote
bro I'm at uni

I think he is asking
I will look into that because it required transcendental equation to be solved
Ok
will you change your name toi fionna the employed once you get a job?
Hi everyone,
I'm about to start my first year as a business major and need to take MATH 108: Introductory Calculus with Business Applications. I've always struggled with math and am concerned about keeping up. I want to prepare myself and improve before classes begin.
What are the best strategies, resources, or study routines to build confidence and succeed in this course? Any advice or tips would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
considering it sounds like this course probably isnt very rigorous id advice simply brushing up on computation involving basic algebra (up to quadratics, rational expressions) and arithmetic (exponentiation rules, being confident at handling fractions), those are some major things that ppl can trip up on anyways
id also recommend getting comfortable with reading graphs and learning to see how a graph will look based on the function and vice versa
as for resources i think something like khan academy would be useful but its also an idea to find any worksheets or such that u can as volume is a p important factor in building these skills
i cant personally give any recommendations but #book-recommendations surely has relevant information
thomas calc or aops works fine
what is pre calc?
calc is short for calculator guys
what us precolc
ri gore?
Calc is short for calculus goofy goober
nah its calculator
Calc-ulus
x -> -2^- means that we want to figure out the behavior of the function as the x value moves towards -2, from the right. what's the behavior of the function near -2?
See the graph
As x tends to -2^-
That is js behind -2, check the value of graph
(it tends to ♾️)
Infinity as -2^- is a number just on the left side of -2... So see the graph from the left side of-2.. as x tends to-2 y tends to infinity.
lol
Dude use #chill
Hopefully this is the right channel since idk I don't do math en English but
How do you calculate a linear function when you know two points like f(-1)=4 and f(2)=-5
I mean I tried to take some guesses but there's gotta be a way to calculate it right?
Do you know the general form of a linear function (also known as line)?
It is y = ...
y=mx+b
y=kx+b
y=mx+c
y=kx+c
pick one
nah general form is clearly ax+by+c=0
Indeed
But let's start with the explicit, I guess
Hopefully it should be a little easier, in my opinion
yes
It's continuous at x=0 so we can apply lim x to 0 and simplify to just get the terms of n?
U did it in 18s 🗿
probably knew answer before hand
He just has a good gaming chair
Bro i left it in 18 s
I knew i couldn't move this mountain
So i left it
Or i should say could try other questions
Did u try what i told
Like tried it
Bcz that's the only reason they said continuous at x=0
Send me if u get answer 
Ok bro 👌
Yeah man very comfy 100 percent suggested
it looks like i can sit on that for hours
I am getting f0 as 4lambda
The only problem is how to find lambda
Can someone help me w 1 and 2
The increacing intervals would be the upper right, and the decreasing would be the bottom left (for question 1) and the increasing for question 2 would be the middle part, and the decreasing woud be the extremities (I think)
Guys I struggle with limits and always make mistakes
What should I do to get better?
How come? Most of the time it’s just direct substituting or if it’s graphed it’s mostly eyeballing
...
Idk what limits you have but it’s def not just replacing or substituting
I have to use tons of trigonometric identity and I musnt make a single mistake to not ruin everything
Not these?
No 😂 I saw those, those are so es
Ez
I have to sleep tho it’s late for me ill tell u more later
Alright cuz I’m curious why you considered those limits to be hard😭
Does anyone know how to solve this??? I have typed my work above
Solve this bro
..
compute the limit as x -> 0 from the left and from the right
from the left, (x+1) < 1 and nearby, this means (x+1)^n -> 0 as n -> infinity
so the limit is just the lambda sine thing / x, as x -> 0 which i think you found to be 4 lambda
from the right, (x + 1) > 1, so (x+1)^n dominates, and the limit becomes
(1 - cos(1 - tan(pi/4 - x)))/x^2 as x -> 0
that comes out to 2
to be continuous, we need the left and right limits equal, so 4 lambda = 2 -> lambda = 1/2
then f(0) + 2 lambda = 2 + 2 * 1/2 = 3
the sine / x thing is easy to find the limit of, the trig composition thing is a lot more annoying, but you can use taylor expansions to simplify
tan(pi/4 - x) centered at pi/4 is about 1 - 2x, so then we have (1 - cos(1 - (1 - 2x)))/x^2
= (1 - cos(2x))/x^2
and thats a lot easier to find the limit for
Of i was just not sure abt the right side
Got it now
Thanks
I really need help, I skipped algebra 2 so I could take pre calc and I’m strongly regretting it, I spend three hours outside of school a week with tutors for me just to keep failing test and for my tutors to just tell me my math skills are weak and I’m probably not going to get a good grade in the class. I don’t know what to do I can’t switch out, I’m working on maybe something for my test anxiety, but I’m willing to put in the work to get the grade I want. I just don’t know how to do it and I would love some guidance!
Do you know exactly what you’re struggling with?
Not exactly l guess just algebra in general which has like transferred over into my pre calc causing me to not do good
practice fundamentals
Since you skipped algebra 2 you kinda skipped the “other part” of algebra
precalc is basically just a review of both algebra classes so you should practice fundamentals msybe go over a textbook
What textbook would you recommend? Or online resources? What are exactly are the fundamentals?
i guess a textbook i would recommend would be Stewart’s precalc. It covers fundamentals in the 1st unit. If you do all the problems you might be set.
For online resources maybe khan academy and prof leonard’s college algebra. If you want lectures that covers the book prof william would be good too.
other textbooks could suffice, i do heavily recommend using khan academy though because it’s pretty good for lower mathematics
Its about the limsup
If log 3+7=x+log3+1, then do I cancel everything out as usual, and then do the same with the logarithms if they are both the same? (x = 6 then right?)
Yeah
log 3 is still a value after you calculate it
So it works out the same as any other number/term
So it is the same as a variable if I am canceling things out then right?
yes
$u + 7 = x + u + 1$: subtract $u$ on both sides, $7 = x + 1$
south
$\log 3 + 7 = x + \log 3 + 1$: subtract $\log 3$ on both sides, $7 = x + 1$
south
Id have to agree with leona here
Stewart precalc is good
It’s also available in many languages if you need it to be translated
Guys I was somewhere out so i wasnt active for some time 😅
But yeah no problemo see this
By guys i mean my only friend @fluid sorrel
Options????
Broo
Btw that limits question
Did u check the answer
A dude replied when I reposted with my work
We just had to check f0+ and f0- when n tends to infinity how it affects (x+1)^n
Hold on
J-i
-i-j
I+j
I-j
Cap cap cap cap
Include cap in all
I aint typin all those caps
Brow what
Are you saying
Answer is given right there bro
Nah mate try again
I + j is far asf bro
Like far asf
Any one else wanna try can try too
I mean who's stopping you guys
I-J is what I am getting by solving
If no then 🗿 dead
Ok ok tell me how i-j
You're taking centrifugal force right ?
Opposing that is friction?
I suppose you did this
Ahhhh 😃
Ok so r vector is perpendicular to v
And it makes 45^° with + axis
So it's roughly proportional to i+j
But it's perpendicular to v
And by figure and data we can say that v is 90° ahead of r
So it's proportional to -i+j
Which we can see from figure
And friction is in the opposite direction of v
So -(-i+j)
i-j
Man what how
First i forgot the fact that v is ahead by 90° and it's obvious by figure that it's going to be -i+j
Friction will oppose v or force?
What more what less?
Opposes both doesn't it ?
Confusion
Yeppp
No answer is not
This
Matter of fact it is given but
It's conceptually wrong
No
Then
Which book is it
No bro I did the worng answer
I mean I knew how the paper setter had
Thought
Centrifugal
And did d
Yk how is it i-j??
Asking
Centrifugal radially outward thats what I thought
But problem is that
Some friction will oppose velocity too
This is who I discussed ts with
And we reached here
Bro
In static state
fs acts in direction of Fc
It's given in book
To prevent this outward sliding, the static friction force fs must push the particle back inward, towards the center, thereby opposing the tendency to slide out.
This
Yes this defines the d option I agree cro
This is the centrifugal force concept man what
Exactly what I said
Which book tho
Module
So now I understand how we were supposed to get this approach
If u remember the core concept of banking of road
There we used this concept in derivation of formulas
Yeah
how does synthetic division work?
What do i do next
X-3=0
X=3 ok right
1 -1 2 ok right
Bring down 1 multiply by 3
Ok right
3×2 6 ok right
So now what bro your question is over
1×x + 2
X+2
Is quotient
howd u get x+2 as the quotient
You've got 1 and 2 in last
Not multiply the 1 by the degree you would get after subtractingthe upper max degree by lower max degree
Which Is , in this case , x
So 1×x
And then multiply 2 by one less degree , which is x^0 , which is 1
So 2×1
This is your quotient
X+2
the remainder is 8 tho
It's nothing bro
It has no specific integer value because it'll change as x changes
Why ? Coz the degree after Subtracting is zero which is some constant
Which is changing as x changes
So its nothing
Damn bro cul
Send the question
thats the questions. use synthetic division to solve that expression
it’s faster than normal polynomial division in some cases, i do get where you’re coming from though because it’s a big time-waster
If synthetic division is taught first and only that is taught , then one can't do anything he'll have to learn it but it's of no profit to learn it after proper long division
Like i did
We translate the central force vector to the origin
That gives us i-k
J
I-j
Got it
It's fs
Acting in direction of Fc
Probably not since at is taken to be 0 acc to options
We're actually not given this information
Ok see assume there is some a tangential
Centrifugal radially outward
Tangential force direction of tangent
Angle between both is 90 degrees
but we don't know the mass and allat to use the tangential acceleration
Of force hence friction
Now if youre assuming that there is no tangential acceleration which the invigilator thought we would assume gives option d
That's why I did d but
I am just saying that actually assuming this is not conceptually sound
derivatives are precalc right?
need to ask a derivative question
why can we use derivatives to find the biggest area of a shape / volume
Because you can use derivatives to find the maximum of a function and so if you have a function that represents area or volume you can find the maximum of it.
i figured out the question i was abt to ask you as i was writing it, my bad if you were waiting for me to type it
No worries
Wym physics cup solution
Oh ok bro
As distinct from the mathematics mug, or the chemistry chalice.
You can also solve it by Wavy Curve Method
Why did you put Denominator equals to zero ? @ivory fractal
So i could find the value of the root
Denominator doesn't equal zero
If then the function will be not defined
In that question, what do you have to find the value of x or just synthetic division to find quotient and remainder ?
@ivory fractal
yeah its just the synthetic division
I solved it, I got x+2 as a quotient and 8 as a remainder, is that the correct answer?
yes
😭
the fuck is calc
what i got was
?
It's correct
Oh ok thx
Np
Calculus deals with some type of continuous change
Like rates of change ,area under curves
acshually calc is short for calculator STOP giving out DISinformation 🙄
what is this diddyblud doing on the calculator
Brainrot ahh
How do you learn solving logarithmic equations and exponential. My brain is wired to find one way/formula to solve all of the same types of questions, but these vary so much it’s hard.
Do feel free to share your doubts
Questions will help you understand concepts in better way
Because all of pre calc up to this has been pretty like
Do these steps, and i’ve mastered it all
But this one has stumped me
Since im learning polynomial division/synthetic division, thats how i’d verify for part a?
Yeah
If you don’t know factor theorem then that’s how they probably want it
remainder theorem or factor theorem
i’ve learnt them too
but im unsure
what to use
factor theorem is finding the zeros right?
Factor theorem says that if b is a root of a polynomial p, then p(b)=0
note that b being a root is equivalent to (x-b) being a factor of p(x)
is that the same as f(c) (x-c)
f(x)=(x-c)g(x) for some polynomial g if c is a root of f if that’s what you’re asking
oh yes that
.

Fionna The Unemployed
Here you go
Bro from where have ya given me this question
This is not some unsolvable question typo right ?
I mean I have a sussy feeling
It's solvavle
Do you want the answer?
You're Indian right? you should have everything it's needed to solve this problem
If you don't like optimization type problems I can give you smth else
What
I do have a pen and a paper
And a gaming chair

very nice problem
It's not for me, anything that require doing a bunch of calculations and algebra precisely is not nice

Yes I suck at algebra I know
i like it both cuz algebra but also cuz it reminds me of like a weaker moving sofa problem
At first glance people think it is
This would waste a good amount of your time
Wait hol up
I cracked it
Man im fucking genius
- Something???
Yeah or no
3.7
Precisely
.
3.7
Man hell yeah
So your headache accounted to your grammatical error?
Yeh likely
I can't even think of anything
It's algebra
$\sqrt{5x^2+14x+9}-\sqrt{x^2-x-20}=5\sqrt{x+1}$
Fionna The Unemployed
I also have this
wdym
Like they don't require brain
Like see this
Take the second term in lhs to rhs
Square both side
Then jus solve solve
Yes you can, but these problem have time limit of only 10-20 min
And that's gonna be a quartic
20 min too much
Yeah ik
Give it a shot
Okie dokie vroski
What I want to say is, there's a way to solve this in only 3min
But you could try what you said
Wait fuck i fcked up in front of da homies
This is nothing triaengle
This's one of algebra problem types in Math Olympiad 
Forget it and don't tell subway
Alright
I mean it isn't like I would have tried something different
Ok so
So that's okay to not solve it 
a problem in BMO1 prep
Otherwise you'll form a perspective
Ok wait Fionna hold on
Hmmm so I will assume hard
If you do induction proof it's not that hard
Yes
Is this correct
Tell answer
could be
Uh I will have to count the powers of 2
This yo answer ?
It ain't numerical
Have you guys seen this, if so Im gonna delete it
I haven't
Sure take a good look and then I'll delete it
imma save this one for Astreae to try
Whos astreae
Ok broski
I find such problems luck based for some reason
It depends on what i try
And it feels like i just stumbled upon it
Well that seems to be the case with pretty much all of maths
Have any of you learnt 3D coordinate ?
I haven't but sam probably has
I have a 3D coordinate problem if any of you want to try
Send once
Do you guy learn the sphere equation?
Sphere equilibrium is crazy
It's math 
Fionna The Unemployed

Wait yeah
Then idk I'm doing 12th calculus now a days
I have 11 th too to manage
And 12th maths too
So it will take me time to reach
You're from 11th?
Yeah
India
Yeah
Yeah
Cool same bro
I only show those questions above to Indian
Racism
Cuz no one in there mind willing to do it and have enough knowledge to do 
Sure sure whatever 
Nah actually man only some people here in India are actually intelligent
Or have atleast basic civic sense
But yeah out of topic
To reach 3d co ordinate
,ti
The current time for fionna_fx is 11:50 PM (+08) on Mon, 03/11/2025.
The racism is insane
Gah damn ok
This is a family of spheres I think
I have never studied actual 3d geometry, but this closely resembles normal geometric problem atleast in its core logic,so I am gonna extrapolate from that
The point (E) and vector direction should give us the equation of the tangent in terms of s,we know that the sphere is at all moments passing through point M,so we need to find the equation of the family of spheres from these two things,the eq of the constantly moving tangent and the fixed point we already know(M)
than we would probably get the coordinates of the center(I) in terms of s,and we need to find a way to eliminate s using the fact that R is a known quantity perhaps? idk really
for the cone thing,we are already given the radius is constant,so essentially we need to form an equation between the height and radius of the cone with the radius of sphere,which comes out to be
R square= r square+h square.
after this we would probably need to eliminate h or r from the equation 1/3πr square h by putting the value from the equation we found, and than use some calculus or something to find the maximum volume
also btw I might be wrong about the family of spheres thing,i thought because we have a family of circles technically there should be a family of spheres,which is just a best guess
😭holy yap bro no one is reading that
too white
I REALLY regret going to the replied message
My eyes ahh
whats the biggest tip you guys can give me for ap pre cal?
<@&268886789983436800>
No bro I aim gonna read
Man my reaction was same
Touch up on your algebra and trigonometry
what books or lectures can you recommend for me
Also watch professor Leonard on youtube.
Idk how to differentiate them and it’s my last attempt
I am actually struggling with matching graphs so bad
yo thats my goat 😋
so uhh did you read it
need help on solving x^3 - 3x less than our equal to sqrt(3)
What exactly did you do? or like do you have any basic idea about what you have to do or do you have no idea at all?
im not even supposed to be here but curiousity got to the best of me, yeah this shit cooks my brain as soon as i look at it
can ayone help me understand the dx in integral🥺
Yeah I read it


