#precalculus
1 messages · Page 79 of 1
Yeas you're right
I hadnt paid attention to the constant angular velocity that's why I used work energy theorem and missed this too
Basically one mistake accounted to both
Hmm yeah now using equations of motion angle of projection and time both will come , so we will get every information about the projectile
Then it's just basic kinematics and all
yeah
Hi! Does anyone know if it is possible to represent w = 6e^π/3 in form of x + yi WITHOUT using a calculator? It is from exam drill, and we won't be having calculators
yeah :( Do u know what is a way to represent it, with a complex part being 0i? (and without using a calculator)
ashy!
nope (sorry its in finnish, says "write the point... in a form...")
I see!! Thank you!
It's not a typo : (
Yeah man honestly i was thinking same too
hey everyone, i would love to understand more about second derivative, i met a lot of questions using it but i still dont know how it worked
thanks in advance!
the uses
if you have a function f(x), its first derivative tells its slope at any point and second derivative tell the rate of change of it's slope.
So like suppose you get f'(x)=0 at some x, that means either x is local maxima or local minima but we don't know which one is it so we can take second derivative f''(x).
If f''(x)>0 that means the slope is increasing that means the x we found is the local minima.
Hey guys, if you need help of precalc you should check out voluntors.org, its a website I made for students to tutor and get volunteer hours (or get tutoring)
Looks somewhat like y=-(2)^x
Pretty confusing, definitely not growth but not standard decay either
A function exhibits exponential decay only when its growth factor (base) is between 0 and 1.
So it's just a negative reflection of ig 2^x graph
It shows exponential change in magnitude
It doesn’t have the right range to be decaying
Yes
Yeppp
what have you tried?
you didn't answer my question
Oh ok i misunderstood
Look first i found meeting points of the circle and line
The circle passes through origin
So one point Is origin
Other is (0.5,-0.5)
Now the center of circle is 1+a/4 and 1-a/4
And the point 1+a/2 ,1-a/2 passes through the circle
So joining origin center and this point
We get a diameter
So from there I'm trying to do things
I tried putting a point on y axis
And got a as 3
Ok ill check for it
it has centre being the midpoint of ((1+a)/4, (1-a)/4); ((1+a)/2, (1-a)/2)
and half the radius of the original circle
here's a diagram
No I get that
.
I don't understand how you got this
the equation of the locus should be $\left(x-\frac{3\left(1+a\right)}{8}\right)^{2}+\left(y-\frac{3\left(1-a\right)}{8}\right)^{2}=\frac{1+a^{2}}{32}$
south
this is probably not the most efficient way but it works
I believe you've totally misunderstood the problem
have a look at this sample problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsAM9IWW6vo
Support the channel:
UPI link: 7906459421@okbizaxis
UPI Scan code: https://mathsmerizing.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UPI.jpeg
PayPal link: paypal.me/mathsmerizing
you can't make another chord passing through the green point that bisects x + y = 0
Yeah that's that's right you're right
Ok Wait hol on lemme see it
Ok I'm done
Yes I was going completely different
this question appeared on the 2023 JEE Mains, so everyone on YT is using the same method
I have a different method: write the circle equation into $(x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 = r^2$, where you need to find $h, k, r$ in terms of $a$
south
if you then take the midpoint and halve the radius, you should get this
then you just need to sub in y = -x and set the discriminant > 0
it's a lot of work yes but I think it's the most clear method
Hmm
I didn't use $xx_1 + yy_1 - h(x + x_1) - k(y + y_1) = 0$
south
(note that $x^2 + y^2 - 2hx - 2ky= 0$ is the equation of a circle which always passes through the origin)
south
Bro look one thing I wanna ask
Like we use this method
IF we use this method
Then how will we take a general point
On circle
Like theta and all typo shi gets in
you need this locus principle
yes
it's another circle that passes through the given point and has half the radius
from that you can deduce the location of the centre as being the midpoint
Ok
f"(x)>0 means the slope of derivative is increasing alright but why is it minimum value by that so?
Beacuse it lowkey means the graph will climb up from there
Yk increasing
The graph climbs
So imagine you climb from somewhere than your starting point is minimum point
That's why minimum
When f''(x) <0 , means graph falls , so same logic , it's local maxima
you should watch some animation video explaining how it works, it's very hard to understand if you can't imagine the slope and the graph in your mind
or i can send a video link if you want
i would love to
dis is tuff
check dm
<@&286206848099549185>, can smbdy help check if what im doing is right😭 the equation is y=3secx. also, how do i graph this im still confused graphing secants 😭😭😭🙏🏻
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
when it comes to graphing secant or cosecant it helps to draw the sine or cosine of the same function
graph 3cosx and place your asymptotes, then you should be able to sketch it out
(just for visual representation)
Draw a graph of cosx for ur reference to draw secx graph
But remember that it's 3 secx
So like u need to draw graph of 3 cosx for reference
How will u do that
Just remember that range of cosx is between -1 to 1 including 1 and -1
So for 3cosx it would be -3 to 3
As shown in above graph
Here
N for y=3secx
Draw y=x graph
Then the point of intersection for a given interval would denote the number of solutions
A
Yeah
<@&268886789983436800>
Can someone give me a brief explanation of exponential functions?
And like what can they represent?
Exponential functions "represent" the traditional y=f(x) functions only , we throw in some value of x in f(x) , we get some value on y
Like for example, y =2^x
Throw in some value of x
X=1 ,y=2(2^1)
X=2,y=4(2^2)
Like that
It's just with exponents in it , BUT make sure x is in the exponent , coz x^2 is not an exponential function
General form = a.b^x
Ohh ok, thank you!
Exponential functions always gives positive values, base can't be negative or zero or one
where can i find materials for pre calculus honors
Also wy istn lateX
remove the spaces between $ and equation
I feel so washed, but is $| v_{1} + v_{2} | = sqrt{|v_{1} |^{2} + |v_{2}| ^{2}}$ ?
Jakexz
wat happened to my sqrt 😕
| v + u |^2 = |v|^2 +|u|^2 + 2|v| |u| cos(x)
where x is the angle between the two vectors
you're missing this
so only if they're orthogobal?
no, that works with any two vectors
Ah I see
ya
so yeah cos(90) is 0
and yeah that would be correct
that's basically the statement of the pythagorean theorem
which applies only to right triangles
oh my
orthogonal means that multiple vectors make 90 degree angles with one another, and by multiple i mean more than two. like the x y z axes are orthogonal.
the right phrase to use here is "Only if they're perpendicular" then yes, it would look like this | v + u |^2 = |v|^2 +|u|^2
I also think that orthogonal means that a system of things are perpendicular on one another, not only with vectors
you can have just two vectors be orthogonal too
perpendicular is a geometrical term, orthogonal is more general, but in this case they are the same
nothing wrong with what he said
In "this" case they're the same ? Are there any cases where they aren't ?
yes, when you are not working with vectors that have a geometric interpretation
for example you can have polynomials that are orthogonal
but "perpendicular" would not really make sense in that context
Ah yes in that way ok
understood
(in arabic, orthogonal translates to (متعامدين مثني مثني) which suggests multiple objects)
ty for making the english meaning clear
Cuz I'm not active
L fionna, L.
scroll up, i misinformed someone like 2 hour ago ❤️
I woke up now and forgot what the integral of lnx is 🙏😭
Guys i suggest we focus on actually something informative than this bs going on
You should open a help channel if you want to get help quickly
Pls help
Yeah mate fax continue with your thing
I mean mam
I guess
xlnx -x
Jk
Yeah man +c
hi
Bruv I want to discuss it first with some people rather than just
Jumping on the solution
what approach are you thinking
Man graphically yeah we are getting pretty much every case here
I actually got p(p(x)) but it's not what the question asks
It asks about conditions
And about that my brain is like not able to think anything
c looks trivial but i cant assure both is negative
anyways ping me when you get the answer
If both roots negative then c automatically positive
true
Here is the answer what am I supposed to ping
i aint watching a 10 min vid🥀
Ok bro I'll tell ya
@carmine orbit yeah mate i deduced that actually this was not correct
It was c<0 and alternate roots
About d idk
I will still wait one more day to think and also if anyone else wants to yk
Try
Bro u can't discuss in exam
Theta the problem
I tried it yesterday
N i got it
But i liked the way the person explained his approach
So i sent the video
Ok bro
yeah but he is trying to exhaust his thought process even more
but how
I yk did some calculation and stuff but I can tell the observation part
Not some actually pretty much
Look man p(p(x))=0 basically means that we want an "X" on which p(x) comes out to be a "negative root" of p(x) only
Basically value of y which when plotted on x is negative root of equation
makes sense
Or just root not important to be negative the value of "X" that we put should basically be negative
Basically just a value of y on negative x which is root of y
When we take c<0 , we can actually surely get such a
Value of p(x)
On a negative X only
This is by some ugly ass inequalities
yeah i get it by intuition
Yeah
The thing is I do not have any idea about the D option
Or probably I need to think more
youll get it by maniuplating actual p(p(x))
Ok yeah you're right
Lemme try first
Nah mate nothing
I'm done
I can't think anymore
aight
y=x^2+bx+c
p(p(x)=y^2+by+c
for the p(p(x)) to have real solution y must have atleast one real solution
now look at the option D
assume c-(b^2/4) to be k
so it becomes k^2+bk+c
from this we can say k=y
c-(b^2/4)= y
so get get y^2+by+c<0 and b>0
y is the minimum value of p(x) by x=-b/2a a=1 we get y = c-b^2/4
hence we can conclude one root of p(x) is negative which implies p(p(x)) has atleast one neg root
yo
Hmm yeah ok
Ohh alr I see kk!
I respectfully do not understand your solution honestly
what was the point of saying ts
The point is that because I can't understand your solution, i cant find mistake in your solution, i can only provide you with solution, mistake you'll have to find yourself
Ok so you're using synthetic division method
Hold on just give me some seconds to learn ts and answer ya
Man you need to take the 4 common out of the quotient
That you've got
12x+20
Reduce it to simplest
3x+5
what's the answer?
l+b = 280
Area = l×b
You can use first derivative to find maxima
be so fr
-23 can be written as -25 + 2
So after that. it becomes.(12x^2 + 5x -25 + 2) / (4x-5)
Now. it becomes.
(12x^2 + 5x - 25) / (4x - 5) + 2 / (4x - 5)
now you divide (12x^2 + 5x - 25) / (4x - 5) and that should be the answer.
which comes out to be
3x + 5
Do Ya know what is first derivative?
no
Yeah man thats what I was thinking
i got an answer of 70 and 70 for this
You in 8th grade
is it correct?
what
what
yes
oh
alright so it does require you to take the derivative of the function
what is derivative
slope of a graph at any given point
ih
Oi listen here just put the total length of fence in perimeter of rectangle formula and do l=b
For rest of ma folks it's AM GM inequality
gng what
This
Is for ya
Mate
2(l+b) = 280
L+b =140
Do l=b
70 70
oh also
should the most area come from a circle?
because a circle has the largest area to perimeter ratio
just asking
Yeah
yeah but for a quadilateral the most area to perimeter ratio comes from a square.
so just putting l = b works
Yk the question is WHY?
Why this
Why from a square
oh
Yeah
just a random question. What will be cbrt of a negative number
a negative number
oh yeah
since (-a)³=-(a)³
yeah odd powers dont change the sign
what is a cbrt?
cube root
ok ty
oh
yo guys i need help to understand this, my teacher did not send the solution
thank you soo muchh, @trim shard & @fluid sorrel !!! 💗 i figured it out
Welcome 👍
My notes never looked this clean

Did u do it
Or u still want help
You see angles in a unit circle
Whole thing is 360 or 2pi
finding reference angle of a angle given is matter of finding which x axis part it is closest to
At the given position
Then subtracting that angle from this
And u get the reference angle
so its 315-360? or 360-315?
315, closest is 360-315
315 is quadrant IV right?
Yeah
270 is 3/4
in B can i convert it first into degree and convert it later to radian?
5pi/6 that’s 0.8 pi ish which means that after the 0.5 pi that is 90 and but it’s before pi
Which means second quadrant
Pi - 5pi/6
No angles in degrees are harder to
Work with
Rather just convert angle into radians
And do the calculations
I mean if angle is convinent to work with do it just straight but
Never try converting radians into degree to do it
See how I did it
Just need to check first number before pi
That’s all can tell position
0 is 0, 0.5 pi is 90, 1 pi is 180, 3/2 pi is 270, 2 pi is 360
Easy
oh
I think i understand it now
I'll send my answer later
the given is different
it's like i need to find the 6 circular function
Yeah find reference
Number
Then find the functions
I am aware of those problems
Trick is to see, sin x = y and x = cos x
so every point in the circle first is cos x and second is sin x
Remember after finding the reference angle it’s easier to find these functions and others BUT crucial detail is the sign of these changes and its same as x and y at that position
Try digesting this information
@bitter pier
So if the reference angle came in second quadrant
y is positive and x is negative
That means
sin x is positive
And cos x is negative
And other functions are just ratios of these
I hope it makes sense
I think main idea is to think sinx and cosx as just the points on the unit circle
I am curious about the solution
Read from here
Real quick
You are almost there
But missing crucial detail
The signs of cosx sinx are wrong hence every functions sign is wrong
You gotta fix them
This is quadrant two where
cosx is negative
Sinx is positive
OHH THAT
So by putting signs u basically went from cos45 to cos135, whole idea of doing reference angle is to be able to do big angles easily
Damn bro ok
so that u can compute known angles
So u complete the reference angles cos and sin then you put right
Sign for them
That’s how u get the original angle’s trig functions
I hope that makes sense
So someone can say compute
cos 120
You won’t do it directly lmao
Rather find reference to 120 it’s 60
Cos 60 is 1/2
But that’s not done yet
This is not cos 120
Yet
120 is in second quadrant
So it’s negative
cos 120 = -1/2
all of them are negative except sin and csc?

@soft plover nah I'm jus playin with ya
Some body has already provided it , the video solution
I guess sherdil
Hol on lemme get it for ya
Here
@viscid thistle i jus read allat stuff ya taught
hats off to ya bro I could never
okay thanks
oh that video I have watched it but I think it's in hindi
it's not clear too what the person is saying
Hmm you're not from India
Thats a problem
Did ya try the language change
Thing in yt
?
oh not yet
Ping me 😃
when replying someone
they get notification
thats ping
u can also do it with
@frail lion
using @ followed by the username
u can also turn off the ping when replying
Ok bro 👌
cool question i found if anyone wants to try!
$f(x)=x+1$
I'm not even kidding I have seen these kind of problem so many times already
it was fun the first time I saw it
Fionna The Unemployed
oh damn
sorry for disappointing you, someone will find the problem interesting really
Yeah but the $f(2x)-f(x)=x$ is overused
Fionna The Unemployed
ohh
So I spotted the funtion instantly
ahh oki
so unrelated but ur notes are so cute 😭
i’m glad i could help in any way
To tag someone by using @ symbol
We helped by explaining the 3secx graph
385??
correct!
It's jee mains pyq right?
HAAUSHSHAH
2025
ohh nicee lol
That's alot
Really??
you in 12th?
Yeppp
Jan 🗿
Yepp
scared af
likee youu🤭hihi thankuusmm
guess thats my last call for help since precal will be over next semester 😓 (THANK GOD)
time for calc after that?
or are you graduating by then already
im still in 11th grade:3 next week semester break then 2nd sem
goodluck queenie, its basically smooth sailing afterwards
precalc was harder on me than calculus
Not being rude but plz use #chill
ughhrhrh i hope so. i almost died earlier from my midterms exam hshshah I only understand the unit circle and forgot how to convert the 10°5"4' blabla to radians and degree😭
sorry😮💨
Okii
10°5"4' is downright archaic
it was useful for sailors and astronomers centuries ago
arcminutes and arcseconds are just a totally unnecessary part of trig these days though
yeahhh but my prof still included itg
IKR why is it still taught
any decent scientific calculator can convert between dms and decimal degrees
yeah exactly
oh wait if you were allowed a scientific calc on your test, that's kind of on you
we are not allowed any calculators on any tests 😭
(referring to this)
just try to remember the conversion between degrees and minutes and seconds is the same conversion as between hours and minutes and seconds
wait is the degree related to the angle the minute hand of a clock moves in a given time?
like 12 hours is 180 degrees? thus 1 hour is 180/12=15 degrees?
1 revolution = 360 degrees = 1 hour for the minute hand = 12 hours for the hour hand
but the point was more that:
1 hour= 60 minutes
1 minute = 60 seconds
1 hour = 60 * 60 seconds = 3600 seconds
1 degree = 60 arcminutes,
1 arcminute = 60 arcseconds
1 degree = 60 * 60 arcseconds = 3600 arcseconds
these are exactly the same formulas
chad
easiest way to remember these is
how close to time system this is
1 mins has 60 seconds , 60 mins has 3600 seconds
thats how i remembered it
💀 🙏🏻
never forgot it
but yeah if i see the use of arc seconds in my questions i go nuts
Bro how did you get this explanation please
Anyone anyone can explain who's solved this
f(x) = x/2 + f(x/2)
Take an arbitrary r
then f(r) = r/2 + f(r/2) = r/2 + r/4 + f(r/4) = r/2 + r/4 + r/8 + f(r/8) = …
if we take the limit of the right, the f(r/2^n) term limits to f(0) =1 (because f is continuous) and the r/2 + r/4 + … limits to r, so f(r) = r + 1, for any real number r. Then f(x) = x+1
Yeah ok I understand
But how did it strike you
What thing does one "see" in such questions so that these things strike
Like probably seeing limit tending infinite or something?
I started by plugging in numbers for x to understand what the functional equation was saying
so like when x = 1, f(2) - f(1) = 1
when x = 2, f(4) - f(2) = 2
this was getting more sparse which wasn’t helpful, but then I thought of going in the reverse direction, so that the points get closer together instead. since f is continuous, points being close together should tell us something about the behavior of f at certain points
that’s why I rewrote the function equation in the reverse direction, from x to x/2, and as I wrote out terms and repeated the expansion, I saw that the non-function terms formed a geometric series, and the functional term’s argument got closer and closer to 0, at which point we know what the behavior of f should be
that was my process
I didn’t realize the terms would form a series until after I started writing a few iterations, it’s not like I magically saw that strategy immediately
Yeah I understand that that's why I asked for the striking point
Ok mate thanks
@viscid thistle am i still missing something?
im struggling with negative angles
like
how do i illustrate it
in the example i need to illustrate both angle and reference
since positive angles form from clockwise rotation, negative angles will form if you go in the counter clock wise rotation
if you need to find the ref angle for a negative angles, you need to find its positive coterminal
smallest positive coterminal at that* then you can find ur ref angle depending on what quadrant ur terminal lies in
C. right?
G(x) is x basically
correct!
it was easy dude
Js try putting x/2 in place of x
You will get a GP
Put the limit and you will get G(x)
yep
Guys I solved this using the special case of an equilateral triangle coz it didn't mention what sorta triangle
Can there be a general method too ?
That's the only way as long as I know
Did u get the correct answer??
Yeah
That's a bit wierd coz otherwise they should've mentioned it
Which book is it
Bcz even in jee pyqs like old ones if they don't mention taking equilateral triangle works
I guess this would be a property to equilateral triangle
Black book
😅 did u check the alternative solution else where
Matter of fact it's a question in Inverse trigo
Can u send ur work bro
Ayee
Yeah man i am confused too
Wym "cash"
If u search the solution plz tag me
this can be done by trigonometry too
Yeah man sure I can
He did it alr
I did it by trigo only
Okkk
Isn't the 1st bracket incorrect
Not very vigorous trigo but some basic observation and sin 30 cos 30 values
What is js I
there is this property II1= 4RsinA/2 and I2I3 = 4RcosA/2
so add both
after squaring
Damn bro what property is this where is this taught
Oh I read the half part
For any triangle ?
And what's A
It was in my module
Thought I1 , 2,3 are also in centres
Bro where is this property
yeah
Damm
Ahh 😯
even i didnt remember, had to open the module and search
.
A is the angle
nah ofc not
Naryana
Damn bro narayna cookin some crazy shi
Its rare to find proof in modules
nah one of the worst modules i have ever seen
You've seen a lot of modules?
they literally have solutions form different chapter, in one of the Sequence and series question, they gave hint that use L'Hopitals rule💀
only naryana ones
eod i use cengage and salas for mathematics
Ok leave I'm just playin this is bs
?
ohhh
What's salas
ohh
um idk im mostly doing unreleated stuff
we have 1 week off so yeah
Ok bro your choice
learning new things mostly
They should add a calc section too for pre university
I mean for the pre university section on the server, there should be a calculus channel too
like people do have a good amount of calculus pre uniersity
Oh
Honestly mate it doesn't make a difference i guess
a little bit of real analysis if elipson-delta definition is emphasised
Yeah mate i totally understand and agree with ya
Bro in lowkey think we should stick to
Jee only
Rest is your choice obviously i can suggest only
Any tips on how to start studying Quantitative Reasoning from now? I need it as a course for Business Major for next semester..
Guys anyone got any idea what I'm doing wrong ?
Your handwriting for starters
This's the proof for that II1 and I2I3 formulas
@frail lion
Hmm ok
And for the main course?
Yeah I had't even seen that formula in my life
That was teh first time
It has a reason for being forgotten, that is the proof way too long ig
That's why we must memories it
Yk actually the formula is pretty specific that's why it's probably not that much important
Like we barely deal with excircles i presume
I looked it up and I found absolutely nothing
Not even that formula
Looked what up the question?
Yeah you wouldn't have probably coz it includes incenter too
Not only excenters if that's the name
The property is valid for x belonging to [-1,1]
Yepp excentres and nine points center
Broski i guess the property is always true
That arcsinx and arccosx property
It's an inverse function 😭
So range becomes domain
The principal domain thing yeah
I agree bruv
Im assuming these things are already in principal domain coz if not then how will we bring them in the P.D?
?
Yeah mate the proof tells it
I mean mam
Ok leave
?
I think
The inner value satisfies the domain
So we can do it
But i think the answer is 0
Bcz what u have done seems right
If we take mod as both negative and once 1 positive
Than we get 0 solution
Bcz 6^√3 is not in domain
Of cosx
I only get this using calculator
Still no result
I'm getting
I am getting cosx = 6^+-√3 and 6^+-√2
Yeah I am too
So
Yeah man pretty wierd thing
How can they be this far
Probably some printing error theyve done in the question
Yepp
Taylor-McLaurin expansion of log(1 + t), where t → 0
Or alternatively L'Hospital -- though it's essentially the same actual computations it leads to.
Or (yet a third way to justify the same computation) define f(x) = log(1+5x)-log(1+alpha·x) and recognize the fraction as the one that appears in the definition of f'(0), so differentiate the function symbolically and solve for alpha afterwards.
All of theses seem to depend essentially on calculus, and I'm not sure how much hope there is of approaching the problem with PRE-calculus tools.
simplify the limit when x not equal to zero and equate it with 10
Yes, but how do you have in mind to simplify log(1+5x) and its neighbor term? Without calculus?
(Or how to simplify log((1+5x)/(1+ax)) if you prefer to rewrite it like that first).
limx->0log(1+5x)/x=5 + logx->0log(1-ax)/x=-a which equals 5-a
nah there is no need to do that
Where do you get those limits from?
limx->0 log(1+x)/x =1 similarly limx->0(1+ax)x=a
What?
Bro i guess put the limit of above function to 0 and equate to the lower
It will be 5-a i think
So a = -5
some knowledge of physics and calculus is needed to do that problem
This's more physic I think
The tangent is just basic calculus eh
Why don't you ask in Physic discord
Yeah mate understandable
Tbh the Physic discord server is quite inactive, at least compare to this Math one
So you might still have to wait
This
Somebody had shared this
I mean
What's his name i don't
Yeah sherdil
Hes preparing for jee
But yeah some only
Ok
Ok thnks
the language for the video can't be changed
I have actually attempted to solve it myself
the only thing I struggle is to find option D
that if you sub in x=c-(b²/4) you get negative
I do by casework
I have difficulty finding the condition when there are exactly 2 roots
Here is the d option solution
Ok unfortunate i guess
how did they directly conclude this?
yea I also noticed that c-(b²/4) is the y-coordinate of the vertex of P(x)
@frail lion
Yeah yeah I'm here
Man theres this thing I'm not able to explain it to ya
Wait hold on lemme think more to how to explain it
Here this
Read this once
C- b^2/4 is minimum value of p(x)
And p(p(x)) has y as its variable
Oi @soft plover
wait I may misunderstood sth
"P(P(x))=P(y)=0 has at least one negative root" does it mean at least one of y1 or y2 is negative or at least one of x1, x2, x3, or x4 is negative?
Atleast one root is negative
X1 x2 x3 x4 not important it has 4 roots
It's not important it has 4 roots
Depends on b and c
But atleast one negative value of x exists on which p(p(x)) is zero
I have read it but still couldn't understand
Indonesia
I am having difficulties relating P(x) to P(P(x))
if I were to solve it I would probably expand P(P(x))
I am trying to visualize graphically
We need A little knowledge of hyperbolic trig here
btw are the conditions A and D in the form of OR or AND?
i.e. must fulfill all of them or just at least one of them?
cuz for example P(x)=(x+2)(x-4)=x²-2x-8 have opposite roots and -b/2=1 and c-(b²/4)=-9 but P(-9)=91 >= 0 and b=-2 < 0
and P(P(x)) has 2 negative roots
What's the actual question @soft plover
this one @median spear
Bro can u show ur work
Also tell me what's the tension of P given in solution
No
It's completely based on rope tension
maybe for your approach
D is a condition bro
It is asked "on this condition is one root negative"
This is how the question is asked
Bro I did not do any work I have no idea how to proceed
Hold on
Idk bro
Tell your answer
I mean the answer is A and D
but are those 3 conditions all must be fulfilled for P(P(x))=0 to have at least one negative root or only fulfilling any one of them is enough?
Can u share the question in book
I am not sure
Is it from hcv?
Any one enough
I actually have got it from somewhere I don't have the book
ah okay
I think I found my own method using visualization
not sure if it's valid tho
K then share it
it's kinda hard to explain but the idea is to visualize in 3D
like this
it's easy to see that if P(x) has opposite roots then so is P(P(x))
so option A is an answer
I think the tension force will be only bcz of the centre of mass
Bcz its not an ideal string
I am still thinking
then if b>0 then the x-coordinate of the vertex -b/2 is negative which makes P(x) will have at least one negative root and so is P(P(x))
I can yap about why I hate Math for 2 hours straight if you love to
Ah, me too
That's why I'm looking for someone to oppose me😭🤚🏻
Make me love math, I swear I'll try💔
Jokes, aside. I need help with math combined physics
Math is bad enough, now with Physics
me but for talking abt it not now cuz I am kinda busy
Sure, I'll add you
I'm preoccupied too so np
ah okay
Yeah... It's for school, I'm a fast learner, but I prefer having fun with it rather than working on it, that's why I need🥹
Ok bruv
Hmm yeah
It'd be nice to live not hating it too
I would love to yapping about how much I hate Math
Yeah ok mate I like yapping about maths too
I think option D the condition where P(c-(b²/4))<0 is redundant
Woman, I think I can yap enough to myself about that. But I'd love to yap about adventure time too
Wym redundant
Adventure Timeeeeee
btw what's your timezone
@soft plover bro wym redundant
I need help, in terms of relating basic functions to the motion of a car. This is for pre-calculus. I've been lost with kinematics for hours.
I found 3, I just don't know how to explain it
It's an option bro it's asked if this condition exists then is there a negative root
I thought you're in Western really
around that
What you mean deriving equations of motions by integral and all ?
Linear functions, Quadratic functions, Constant functions. The real life application of those to a car in motion
Lol why?
Cuz Asian usually watch anime, not cartoon and the chance of you being Australian is kinda small
Honestly I don't understand what are you trying to imply here
A car can move in like , 3 ways
No offence btw
So, basically. I have to explain how I can apply basic functions to the motion of a car. In real life and the functions I've found related to that are those three
oh nvm
yea I thought about it wrongly it's not redundant
so basically you just need to think of the properties of P(x)=0 which makes it have at least one negative root cuz then it will automatically map the same properties to P(P(x))=0
None taken
I'm not easily offended, so I can work with the latter
I've been watching cartoons since I was a child, that's why my English has been better than my native tongue
Yes I mean what else could've caused tension
Ok
Yeah you got it brotato chip
I understand the basic functions, I understood the physics, but separately. I don't get how they're connected entirely
Ok so what do you mean when you say you understood the physics seperately
Motion, Speed, Distance, Time, Displacement, Position. I know how that works...
Great , now connecting all those stuff together is physics
And stuff are connected together by what ? Maths and different functions
Exactly that's what I said just now
The subject in question that I'm working on is pre-calculus
The basic functions I told you about. From pre-cal
.
yea I am just having difficulties relating them 2 and I finally figured it out by visualizing
I guess Fionna must have a better advice coz
I have just entered 11th grade
I'm in 11th grade too, mate

Can you help? Lol
That's why I am saying you must have a bettee advice
You must've been through this already
Im deadass stupid, don't look at me
In the name of calculus i just know about functions , a bit aod and inverse trigo
Ehh, the program is different between countries
Nah you proved that shit that long ass property bro
And also school
So you can't help?
just pure luck 
It depends on the material
In detail
This is supposed to be just basic functions... I know functions. What the heck is this..
I mean yeah I can most obvious ly
Try asking something
How do the three given functions apply to a motion of a car?
How does it work?
How do these three apply to a car
Yeah
Ok look
- Constantfunctions : help in constant speed
2.linear speed: fuel use at constant rate i guess
3.quadratic ': most obviously accelerating or curved path
Visually why?
Graph
The graphs
Mhmm
Yeah constant function horizontal line
Linear must be straight line
Quadratic is parabola
lmao
What bro why
Obviously....
Now, how does that connect to it?
it's just that its common knowledge lol
Ok ok I'll tell that too
Like take constant function, y=c
Now the output which comes out does not change
Like v(t) = something
Then that is not going to change
Now take linear function
It's like y=mx+c typo
There's a constant rate change
Like for example if my car ccelerates uniformly , then distance increases linearly with time , not a constant quantity
Like d(t) = v(t) + d
Something like that
Basically rate of change constant and uniform
That's the difference between the two
And the quadratic functions have acceleration in them
Ok enough
For example the equation s=ut+1/2at^2
so in linear function the distance traveled is directly proportional to time?
like you said
y=mx+c
but
idk what for c
like im thinking y will be the distance, m will be speed and x will be time, so what is the c?
oh
It's inital distance
ARE YOU ABOUT TO BE HELPFUL?

