#precalculus
1 messages · Page 72 of 1
You've actually helped a lot
idk why you didn't get
anyways may we ask that cursed limit to Ann
?
that tetration limit
help in the help channels or forum
ok thx
no
its automatic, i understand dw

i had to leave the server for 3 months
What?
its like bot auto assigns roles at reaching certain msg per day in help channels i think
why
you lost all your msg count, sad
touch grass
but he got helpful role
between linear algebra and discrete 😂
then aah maybe bot stores msg count and doesn't reset it after leaving or he really helped a lot after joining
i finished the LA course but i still study a bit, and will take discrete
but rn im doin programmin :l
nah you need to leave for 3 months to get it
thats some crazy requirement
word
get the green role by touching the green thing for 3 months
yep
mods really wanted us to touch grass to get the role
you're very helpful when ur not on the server
Anyone ping me here when you've got an interesting limits or sum or prod
Can someone explain me this pls (supposedly this can be classified as precalculus), the only I know is that is something similar to a summatory
This denotes the cardinality of the union of ${0}, {1}, {2}, \cdots {10}$
Civil Service Pigeon
Tysm❤️
I still dont get precalc definitions
like what is d/dx, or dh/dy, ect
I get what they may mean through proxy, but I dont understand what they are trying to say
Is d/dx trig?
I mistyped
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and saving your progress—now: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-differentiation-1-new/ab-2-1/v/derivative-as-a-concept
Why we study differential calculus. Created by Sal Khan.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-derivative...
ty
also there is no such thing called precalculus definitions
I sent you the concept of derivatives
like
d/dx
I dont know what precalc is
I just assumed
We dont do precalculus where we live
And as there is no precalculus channel, well I assumed as I just started...
idk is derivative precalculus
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus @errant shard try this
Do we need to do "get ready for precalculus" before precalculus?
in KA
Derivatives are the central concept in calculus.
So it wouldn't make sense for them to be part of something sold as PREcalculus.
I see
Is this all the precalculus stuff? @hushed sphinx
I have no idea
We just do calculus
I have no idea, "precalculus" appears to be a chiefly American topic grouping that I have no first-hand experience with. I can just deduce from the name that it has to be different from calculus itself...
Precalc is actually just different subjects like trigo and stuff combined lol, if you good at that stuff you can just start calculus
Not a real thing imo
... what
idk is it L
can you write on paper what function you're referring to
yes
oh yeah that's an old fashioned notation for factorials
in modern notation this would be $\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{(n+2)!+(n+1)!}{(n+2)!-(n+1)!}$
Ann
I see
Will gamma function do the same thing as factorials when the input is positive integers?
Can I learn gamma function now?
how good are you at integration
idk at which level i am
hmm
I know basic integrals
<@&268886789983436800> scam
hm ok let's try this first: $\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{\dd{x}}{1+x^2}$
Ann
does this look like something you're able to calculate
,, [tanx]_{-\infty}^{\infty}?
Monkey•D•Luffy
arc
oh shit
yeah i mean you might wanna learn not to confuse tan with arctan for starters lol
Wow throwing shade
mmm sure!
no direct link to Gamma ftr i just wanted to gauge your level
Am I eligible?
??
lol
id say probably not yet? like don't take my words as gospel but i do think you might wanna spend time getting better at integration (and tbh also probably learning some real analysis)
i mean
eh
line in the sand ig but i don't necessarily expect him to spend 17 years with epsilon bashing
Thank you for your suggestion! but what is real analysis?
calculus concepts but rigorous
I recommend the bright side of mathematics
Good view into starter stuff...
Wow that's some exciting math
What is that?
Scam analysis?
<@&268886789983436800>
calculus concepts but not calculus?
im refusing to draw any line in the sand between calculus and analysis.
I don't think now is the best time for you to do real analysis
Where are you preparing for JEE?
try not to study for 12 hours a day challenge
I don't know about him but I am definitely not studying for more than 30 mins
@hoary iris how much do you study on a daily basis
I Just don't do unecessary stuff lol
Same i don't really study physics and chemistry
and study for both for my JEE and school as I am not in integrated one
Same here
it is like math (-1/12) while physics and chemistry (the probability of determining the position and momentum of an electron simultaneously)
lmao
The difference from math to physics and chemistry just discourages me
Are you in integrated or normal school? @uncut star
eventhough I waste time in math in others pov
π
Yeah you do you don't need to know what gamma functions are when you've barely started limits 
I do know some basic integrals lmao
Still, stuff like gamma isn't necessary at even jee adv level, do chem or smtg instead
I am in an integrated school
Unfortunately
12th grade?
no need

definitely complete integral calculus from cengage
Especially definite integration
trust
What do you mean by "no need" lmao? No need to study chem?
bro
No need of stuff like gamma
Ah
I am still recovering
Grind hard fr, even my chemistry was a bit weak before giving jee but definitely not as bad as it used to be before i tried to actually do it properly
How can i strong my physical chem
Physical chem is just grinding numericals imo
Organic is about doing ms chauhan
And inorganic i have no idea, i just studied from notes usually
Inorganic is memory based
It's not unfortune 
Is rate of change the same as the derivative?
it could be if you’re talking about rate of change locally at some point
But people could also refer to the average rate of change over some interval as that
take some differentiable function f, the first one is computing f’(p) to give you the derivative at some point p
the second one is fixing some a and b in f’s domain and taking (f(a) + f(b))/(a-b)
i.e. slope of the line going through the points a and b
if f is linear then these will give you the same thing because the derivative of f will be constant
what is the derivative of 8?
what do you think
I have no clue
look at the definition and give it a try
définition of what
the derivative
what’s that
how does f change at any point x
f(x)
We haven’t covered variables yet
ight I would look at that before looking at derivatives then
ok can you explain them really quick please
but the answer to your question is 0
because it just looks like a flat line going through y=8
so the rate of change is 0 bc it never changes
We just finished multiplication in my class it’s a class for kids with learning disabilities
Im going to uni next year so im tryna learn it cuz im going into a math major
to khanacademy you go lil bro
what’s a variable I don’t get it
Why is it not a number
it’s a letter
is it like Greek numerals like does x equal 10
deadass
Im so cooked guys
indeed you are
I think it’s to late to go for liberal arts
« Grass » is one of my triggers so lets stay respectful please
What is the use of homogenous functions?
what do you mean by homogenous functions?
I just wanna know what are it's uses and I don't has any other questions!
something like this
I meant that homogeneous can have different meanings according to the context you're working with
in context of JEE
You can tell me about the pure mathematical homogenous equations too
I wanna know about it!!!!
cud someone explain linear differntial eqn in a simple yet definition based
a linear differential equation is a differential equation which is linear
wut?
then f(x) is
a) continuous for all 1 <= x < 7 but not differentiable at x = 1
b) continuous for all -1 <= x < 7 but not differentiable at x = 1
c) neither continuous at [1,7) nor differentiable at x = 1
d) continuous and differentiable at x = 1
How can i solve this?
ive taken the left and right hand limit at x = 1 for which i got the result 3 and 6 so the function is not continuous as x = 1 which also implies its not differentiable at x = 1
should i evaluate the left and right hand limits for the intervals [-1,7) and [1,7) as well?
All these options seem suspicious.
f(x) is neither continuous and hence nor differentiable at x=1
However, it is differentiable at x belongs to (1,7)
wait mb i typed the option wrongly, its
c) neither continuous at [1,7) nor differentiable at x = 1
ok c then!
I have a ti84 plus ce and casio fx9860, however my school wants me to get the casio fx-cg50. Would that really make a difference idk? I use the casio 9860 for math cuz it gives exact values but the ti for physics and chem for easy storing and rentry of previous answers. The fx cg50 is 100-150 dollars depending where i go for purchase
Substitute x^2 + a^2 = k
where r u stuck
when i take tht = k , i get dx = dk/2x
then
when i substitute dx in the integral
can i cancel 2x and x in numerator?
..alr i got the answer
In which pattern does tan x goes?
iirc tanx maclaurin series is a bit cursed
i cant imagine a scenario where you have to know more than the first couple terms by memory
$\tan(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{|B_{2n}| 2^{2n}(2^{2n} - 1) x^{2n - 1}}{(2n)!}$
Transparent Elemental
where B_2n is 2n-th bernoulli number
I think 'a bit cursed' adequately describes that
Then it is no longer humane!
<@&268886789983436800>
This is what I tried but I don’t really know how do I find n from here
Like I can’t do the algebra part😭
<@&286206848099549185>
how do i even solve these high exponents😭
latex it down
and ill help you
idk latex if u want i can write it properly and send it
$$ \frac{\left(\frac{3\left(3^n-1\right)}{2}\right)}{\frac{1}{6}\left(1-\frac{1}{3^{2n}}\right)} $$
TPD
here i did it
What do you wanna do with this? @vagrant nymph
Find n for which thing thing =3^10
this was the og question i might have made some calc mistake i tend to make a lot of those
<@&268886789983436800>
what did he say
The message that got deleted
It is some scamming spammer!
lol
not tpd
Oh
Could someone please sidebar with me for fda/real zeros? I'm still pretty confused about some stuff
pardon?
hi
prove the following
a) The sum of a rational number r andban irrational number t is irrational
b) The product of a rational number r andban irrational number t is irrational
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What did you try so far?
man this equation seems unsolveable
X=3 btw...
Unsolvable indeed
immaculate equation
6x/10x=x/5
3/5=x/5
x=3
Y'all fast
3
This is the reason why big shots shouldn't come here lol
so hard
Hmm?
$\frac{x}{x-1}>0\cap (\mbb{R}/{1}$
Banned in different channel
Enterlessguy
There we go
That inequality + the fact that x has to be a real number thats not equal to 1
So in summary you have the set x/x-1>0 intersect R minus set of 1
Okay thankss these confuse me
There was some spam message
is ap precalc bc really that hard guys
im an incoming sophemore and im lowk scared
background info, i took honors alg 2, 1 semester i got a b+ and 2 semeter i got an a-
it's just AP precalc: you mixed it up with AP Calc BC
but it's not that hard
given your background
it's fairly new but yes
no more new than the digital SAT though
out of the loop indeed
from how you reacted you could also be Canadian or something
Indeed it is
I constantly look to places outside my school at this point
The math program is decent but the sciences
Hoo boy
My last bio teacher doesn't believe in dinosaurs
The one before that said 5G causes cancer
Idek anymore
But Precalc was fun <3
When I took Precalculus in the senior year of high school, we just called it an Honors class, but it had IB styled problems. IB was like my school's version of AP. It was uh, weird? And british?
Don't quote me on the british part.
it's not British at all
it's very international though
British would be IGCSE then A levels
I thought somebody told me it was at one point but I know the I stands for International so what you say checks out.
Truthfully I don't really remember, that was a long while agoZ
IB is french
did you know there's a European Baccalaureate
That’s how it was for me as well, it was Honors Precalc
I took it two years back
I think it may be “CHS” or whatever now
Truthfully? I am not sure if it was a knowledge gap (I got into math very late, I didn't really realize I was really into math until late high school) but I took non-honors math classes until Precalc Honors and I struggled with most things. I got a lot of certain topics but others I really didn't click with, and for some of my other friends who were more academically inclined they found it rough too, so maybe it was the teacher or teaching or how things were set up, but I got a C in that class. And I was happy. It was the first time I did get a C, though.
I later went on to breeze through Calc 1, very graciously mind you, with an A. I did really well in Calc 2 as well, so I guess Precalc did its job in prepping me.
No I’m the exact same way. I took honors Precalc my freshman year and finished with a C average, and then got an A overall in Calculus
Idk what it is
repetition legitimises (Neely)
But Precalc felt so much harder
if you see precalc for the first time it's going to be hard to do well
give students a second chance and they can do much bettert
That’s fair yeah
truthfully, half of calc is just precalculus content applied to new situations
Maybe they make it hard so they know you'll do well!
Like imagine if a giant, buff, muscular dude just clocked you in the jaw and then some really scrawny 10-year-old kid kicked your shin.
Like yes the latter did hurt, but the pain was lessened in a way because you were worried about your face not your shin.
Weird analogy maybe.
Or maybe I'm weird.
Calculus felt like the cool older brother to precalc
You met precalc went to his house and just were astounded by the coolness
Yeah I remember in Precalc we talked a lot about domain and ranges of certain functions and the graphs of functions you don't see all the time like exponential functions and functions with radicals. You learn about those briefly in algebra 2 and then never really touch upon them again. Stuff like asymptotes, etc.
It's also where I learned the unit circle for the first time. That was something I was really happy I picked up early. I took it to heart, later in college my classmates were spending time trying to memorize it, I already had it all down.
Ah, also wear I graphed sine and cosine and tangent functions and learned how to for the first time.
Good times.
yeah there's great benefits to doing precalc
in short all of this filler, alg 1 and alg 2 can be fast-tracked if someone has the ability
really what we need to be testing is precalc for those students
to see what they don't understand and do understand, out of everything they've studied so far
Thank u
to have a more complete answer you could do start by determining the domain of the function ,then check if -x is in this domain.
Wdym find if "-x" is in the domain? x is a variable.
what is an even function
f(x)=f(-x)
oh
Hm?
for example for (3) it would be:
$f(x) = 1/x^2$
the domain of the function (where the function is defined) is: $D_f = \left{x\in\mathbb R/ x^2 \neq 0 \right} = \left{x\in\mathbb R/ x \neq 0 \right}$= $\mathbb R^{*}$.
Koka
let $x \in D_f$.
$x \in D_f$ $\iff$ $x \in \mathbb R^{}$ $\iff$ $(x < 0 $ or $ x > 0)$ $\iff$ $(- x > 0 $ or $ -x < 0)$ $\iff$ $(- x > 0 $ or $ -x < 0)$ $\iff$ $-x \in \mathbb R^{}$ $\iff$ $-x \in D_f$.
Koka
and then you do $f(-x) = 1/(-x)^2 = 1/x^2= f(x)$.
Koka
let me think
it's been a long time since i did those kind of exercices
maybe for a function defined by pieces..
x is still a variable so wouldn't the pieces of the function just adjust accordingly?
like for x > 0 f(x) = something and x < 0 f(x) = another thing
Like if f=1 for x<0 and f=2x for x>0,
when we put -x,
We get f=1 for x>0 and f= 2x for x<0
Yeah that's why I can't really see the point of $D_f$
Executor (ask on server b4 DM)
but to do those kind of manipulation you should determine first where the function exists
hence the use of Df
do you know how to code?
A bit, why?
Actually i want to learn how to code but i don't know where to start
i think it will be very useful to learn
I see
imo you shouldn't start with something high level like python
By high level here I mean user friendly and more compile time
Like all the concepts can be learned well
But when you move to something like cpp or assembly the syntax requirements will trouble you
Maybe you should start with something like Arduino.
arduino
Hm, not the compiler, but if you want to see the hardware you'd need to buy that
thanks
Arduino mostly has applications with hardware, so if you don't want to buy that I'd suggest cpp.
That was my first language.
cpp , i will keep it in mind
Yeah cool, it stands for c++, look it up 
Does any1 here in teach uhm math like one on one
$50 for 5 hours doesnt have to be the same say
Fr
Min hourly wage for tutoring is double that, hun
But you can ask in the help channels for free!
this is straight up calculus dude
also the integral is missing a +c
and the integral is in terms of which variable? that's also missing
Btw , does rational integration hard ?
yes, unless you integrate in the complex numbers
if you integrate in the complex numbers you can decompose any polynomial denominator into its linear factors
so PFD
Can someone check no.3 answer?
ask in the help channels or ask in #calculus
not here
It*
is what you sent before calculus? no
it's straight up calculus
anything in the us precalc curriculum goes here, examples include: trigonometry, logarithmic and exponential functions, function sketching, etc.
Thanks, I'm new to cal (I'm a high schooler)
J wein
can u help me with geometry
im going into 8th grade
and i dont know shit
but yes your work is correct for no. 3
nice work!
Sup?
there's also a technique called the reverse chain rule that helps you integrate f(kx) where k is constant, without doing the substitution
if you just want to check your answer, not the process next time
,w integrate sin(3x) cos(3x)
Thanks bro
np!
can't you let u = sin(3x)
so that du = 3 * cos(3x) dx
dx = 1/[3 * cos(3x)] du
also just a good tip whenever you see integrals like this with linear trigonometric functions
you can assume it's u-substitution
d/dx sin(x) = cos(x)
d/dx cos(x) = -sin(x)
d/dx sec(x) = sec(x) * tan(x)
but if it's like degree 2 and above you have to find a way to get an identity
can someone teach me calculus
Don't you feel like it's too much to ask? 😅
Your textbook can.
i dont understand it
Change textbook
i cant
Or tell us why you don't understand it
You could probably have some prerequisites missing
well
what prerequisites do you need to understand it?
as far as i understand
calculus is about finding the area of a curvy graph
Precalculus, prealgebra, trigonometry
i know trignometry
idk what prealgebra is
idk what precalculus is
maybe ive done it before
Pre-algebra is a primary branch of algebra designed to prepare students for a standard high school algebraic course.
In mathematics education, precalculus is a course, or a set of courses, that includes algebra and trigonometry at a level that is designed to prepare students for the study of calculus, thus the name precalculus. Schools often distinguish between algebra and trigonometry as two separate parts of the coursework.
95% of pre-algebra is done
Awesome
Make sure to know how to deal with fractions very well
Both with numbers and letters
pre-algebra is introductory algebra
copious amounts of algebra and trigonometry
oof
calculus 2 and 3 is trigonometry-heavy
you have to learn stuff like conversion to polar form, polar coordinates, evaluating using radians, how to integrate or differentiate trigonometric functions, etc, etc
just for clarification integration is what you specified about "area under a curvy line"
it finds it
while derivatives find the rate of change at some point of a curvy line
No
That’s just one minor niche you can use it for
Hey dude I am new here
Welcome! 
Hi guys, I’m taking Ap pre calculus next year, can any of you guys give me tips on how to pre study it so I can get ahead?
trigonometric identities, unit circle, trigonometric equations and de moivre's theorem
also equations of circle, ellipse, hyperbola and parabola
make sure you also have good algebra skill and basic trigonometry knowledge as prerequisite
Guys how do you find the interval of a trig function
Is it something set in stone
or is something you have to find?
if so how
t his
also you have to learn your trigonometric identities
remember tanx = sinx/cosx
if cosx = 0, then tanx will be undefined
and cotx = cosx/sinx
if sinx = 0, then cotx will be undefined
Okay so I just have to memorize them
sinx is -pi/2 to pi/2 right?
on unit circle?
or am I being sumb
Both sin and cos have all the real numbers as domain.
"Interval"? Your solution is just all the values of x for which cos(5x)=0
So just find the general solution
And see which of the options fit it
How do you tell if the value represents the max or min?
would I just have to graph it and check that way?
You could graph the sine function to figure it out yeah
sin has a min at 3pi/2 and a max at pi/2
so if I'm not able to graph it it's always safe to assume that when it's 3pi/2 it's talking baout minimum value
and if it's pi/2 it's max?
sir
You could learn that off for sin if you want to 
sine has its max and min at arcsin(1) and arcsin(-1)
find the general solutions to those arctrigs
and then make sure the inside value of the sine matches to those values
aka if its sin(ax+b) the ax+b inside has to be equal to the x value for sin's minimum
sin and cos can be analytically continued to the entire complex plane
The complex inverse trig functions attain complex values on non principle branches
And by maximum modulus principle they are technically unbounded ;)
Did I solve this right?
you're wrong right at the 1st step
We don’t use the identities do we
I couldn’t subtract the cos(x)?
the identity you used is wrong also
my suggestion here is convert sin^2(x) to cos^2(x)
and solve it like a quadratic
Basically you find the slope of the lines and make it pass through your desired points somehow
For example, in 1) the slope of 2x-5y+10=0 is 2/5, so the slope of the line perpendicular to it is -5/2.
it says find the "equation" what that does mean? should i only find the slope and thats it or it means somethin
It means to find a line
Since a line can be defined using an equation
For example the line y=mx+b has slope m, here we need to find b so that the line passes through the point given
- the line we need to find has slope -5/2 so there's y=-5x/2+b
Since it passes through (1,-2), just sub x=1 and y=-2 and solve for b
ohhh i kinda get it now.. but il take my time to comprehend it more
thank you
also should i also do the same for the rest?
It's pretty much the same, find the points the line needs to pass through as well as the slope (depends on paralel or perpendicular)
@regal oar ayo
ok so when it comes to fractions in general
you can cancel things out on the num and denom if they're factors of each
yoo
namely, $\frac{a \cdot b}{a \cdot c} = \frac{b}{c}$
Ann
this is the core idea of any kind of fraction cancellation
and it remains in effect no matter what
yea
ok right
I udnerstand that part
notice that if the numerator was instead something like
ab + d
then it would no longer be in the form of a * something
and so cancellation would be impossible
* means multiplication as always
is this task incorrect?(Find the maximum point of the function y=-(x²+400)/x)
because it's limit when x->-0 is +inf
имеется в виду локальный максимум
там не написано что локальный и не написано про промежутки
про глобальный речь не идет
обычно в заданиях егэ всегда пишут какой промежуток чтобы не было вопросов
локальный максимум у этой функции вроде бы один
так и есть
но в условии не указано что нужен локальный и на каком он должен быть промежутке
мне кажется что файл с этим заданием содержит не все данные
и в оригинале условия были другими
локальный максимум -- точка, в которой первая производная 0, а вторая -- отрицательна
это я знаю
но математика точная наука, и когда не говорят что нужна точка локального максимума на промежутке, а говорят найти просто точку максимума у функции которая не ограничена сверху то явно что-то не так
Hey @willow bear @dusk magnet, for moderation purposes we request that all extended non-English conversations be moved to DMs
k
I apologize for the inconvenience
Multi post?
didnt know where i was supposed to post mb
already found it tho
Alr you can delete it if it's solved
Apologising to whom for what??
Apologizing to Ann and Uo for shooing them out to DMs.
for the record, uo did not DM me
to those that are out of school and training and job interviews and normal places to encounter an actual test
what is the hardest test/quiz you find yourself given in your normal life
using test/quiz loosely, obviously

How would you find the exact answer of this without a calc
Or is it already simplified enough to be considered exact?
,rccw
that's as simplified as it's going to get
Okay ty 🙏
How do I tell what function it is exactly? I can only find the x-intercepts being x=-3, x=1, and x=5.
That's interesting
It's a rational function assuming ing the part before x = 0 goes to positive infinity
I've been staring at this for 20 minutes and im so lost
Furthermore, the numerator must be at least of degree 3 + 1 = 4, cause the denominator is linear (only one vertical asymptote)
x=-3 being asymtote right?
No, that's the root
My best guess based on the graph is x = -2
impossible, without futher information (if u want to be pedantic)
pick a random function and pray
ok
At least use the roots tho
It's possible but you have to keep trying functions of this form until it matches
You must have (x - 1)^2 (x + 3) (x - 5) in the numerator cause of the roots
But 1) you don't know the vertical asymptote and 2) you don't know the vertical stretch
Maybe vertical stretch isn't a problem here, the graph passes through (2,-5)
Ah cool
Yeah there are plenty of integer points
i figured it out
That one looks the most exact
its f(x)=(x+3)(x-1)^2(x-5)/(x+1)
That looks correct
Is this correct?
Move 4 to the other side first before taking log
Yeah...
Then 1/(4+e^2x)=11/50
Is there still a 1 left over…
After we cross out..
The 50 😭
Oh god
I see it now
This
alr
if we have the equation
r = 6
and it has to be graphed on a polar graph
would I plot a singular point or have to plot a circle?
well r=6 means you’re graphing everything 6 units away from the origin
so a full circle
Does this look right
that should be a circle
cos graphs in polar are circles with a diameter of the coefficient, in this case 3, and the left most point is on the origin
I tried but if I need the edges to touch 1.5
I don't think making a circle would work on this graph
yeah the radius is 3/2 because the diameter is 3
because then I'd hhave to change the diamters
yeh so this is probably the best I can get it
unless I'm missing somethingz?
no it should definitely be a circle
why not
yeah the radius is 3/2 so that’s done
like I said
yeah and it is on the graph
I don’t really get what you’re confused about
Do you think you could js draw it somewhere
I don't get what's wrong about it
yeah
Woah
That’s so cool 😭
well not actually a valid proof because I would need to show more rigorously that the angle there is 2theta
kinda just hand waved that
chatgpt gave a better proof anyway
Can someone please check my graphs and what I wrote for point of intersections at poles?
I figured out the problem with my r = 3cos(theta)
It’s now a circle
Are the values of theta for which the polar graph of 3cos(theta) 0<=theta<=2pi or just pi
I have to find those for the shapes formed by the graphs here
I just don't know how to find said intervals
you mean just plug it in
and find it like that?
wait
Oh my god I'm an idiot 😭
I literally drew out the graphs for the equations
which have the innterval I need 😭
You explained it good (I watched the limits vid)
But the audio was a bit difficult to understan
but yeah it was pretty good js the audio 🔥
hi guys are there any linear algebra sources you could recommend? anything to help self-study before university hits
didn't notice these chats thanks
I learned sigma and product operator today and got too excited 😭😭
I'm not sure what I'm seeing but I'm not lovin' it
Yes I love those. Learn how to drag sigma a bit better 🙏
This is pleasing to the eyes. Anyway, what were you studying then? I mean the topic you're going through
Good luck solving that
You gonna be hella lucky if the answer is even finite 
yes you did
How to find the least value of n for (sqrt(3)+i)^n to become real and purely imaginary without trying every n values from 1 to some number which gives the answer?
The real and purely imaginary are separate questions
Well least is 0 for it to be R
Sorry n should be positive mb
Interesting question...
I would set it equal to a+0i and try to use binomial formula
Perhaps we can also use the fact that (a+b)^n>=a^n+b^n
Not sure if that will help though
What will a be?
Any real number
How to find n in this way btw?
not sure... but
Find the argument of sqrt3 + i then multiply by n
It's based on De Moivres
Sorry I am not taught what is argument and de moivres @willow skiff
I am only taught the arithmetic of complex numbers
Argument is angle between z and the origin
With some properties of it
Come back when you know it
I see
It's clearly designed for someone who knows
If you don’t know the geometric interpretation of the complex multiplication, then it would seem your only cance is to try every n until you find the first purely-imaginary power.
But you won't need to try very far!
But not for us
I see
I will give it a try after I have done the graphical thing
Thank you for your information!
The graphical thing?
um what do you mean by geometrical representation of multiplication of complex numbers? @hushed sphinx
I only know that multiplying a number by 'i' rotates the number by 90 degrees in the argand plane
That's one example. Basically every complex number has a magnitude (absolute value) and an angle, which is the argument of the number.
Multiplying some complex numbers will multiply the magnitudes together while adding the angles up
For example, i has a magnitude of 1 and a 90° angle, while 1+i has a magnitude of √2 and a 45° angle.
Their product is -1+i, which has a magnitude of √2 and a 135° angle.
whooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
can we represent argument of some complex number z as Arg(z)?
Yeah I think that's correct
Can we say z=cos(arg(z))+i sin(arg(z))?
Mhm
But
That's only if |z|=1
Otherwise the general formula is z=|z|(CiS)
(CiS) is a shorthand way of writing cos(argz)+isin(argz) btw
is r=|z|?
Yeah
This is the polar form of complex numbers
we can find the arg of some number z if we represent them in polar form. right?
You'll also learn the euler form eventually
it is e^(i arg(z)). right?
The polar form is just a representation like the normal z=x+iy, in the polar form if you factor out the common multiple, that will just be your 'r'
Mhm
I have a doubt regarding r=|z|
is it really true?
can you give me an example on this?
axe cutter
@noble lava
Wdym?
r is just a representation for |z|
Yeah
and the magnitude of z denotes the distance of z from 0
and thats the same as the hypot
hence r=mag(z)
yes it is but........
but?
what does this mean?
Is cis(argz) the unit thing?
Enterlessguy
$z=re^{i\theta}$
Enterlessguy
$\abs{z}=\abs{re^{i\theta}}$
Enterlessguy
ye bro but is cos(arg z)+ i sin(arg z) the unit thing of that number?
$\forall z \in \mbb{C}: r\ge 0$ hence $\abs{z}=r\abs{e^{i\theta}}$
Enterlessguy
yes because thats r=1
That's the angle part, the magnitude is the r
How to represent z=1+i as in this form btw?

What part's not clear?
How to find arg z?
$\arg(z)=\arctan{\frac{b}{a}}$
Enterlessguy
(but)
What are b and a here?
you need to make adjustments based on the quadrant of z
z=a+bi.
but here since both of your a and b are positive
you can just use this formula
The range of arctan is (-90°,90°) iirc
yes
The argument's range is [0°,360°)
-# i was wrong oops
so for some quadrants,
you need to consider starting from 180 degrees
thats what I mean
negative pi to positive pi
(]
yeah I don't really remember things correctly so I'm not sure
Conventional principal argument is defined that way 
yes
but why not 0 to 2pi?
Because everyone sure loves seeing other people suffer 🥰

lessguy and cutterr
whyyyy nottt?
they're gone without telling it 😭
It's just how it's defined
its just nicer to define it the other way
so when you don't slightly move under the positive reals
you immediately don't jump to 2pi
From this I conclude that I'm not nice. □
for quadrant 1 arg(z) is just theta
for quad 2 arg(z) is theta +pi
etc...

How the formula came??
Quadrants 1 and 4 are quite easy to see
math 
its trigonometry...
I think you can derive it yourself...
I want to know the math behind it!
For 2 and 3 you just throw in a pi and pray it works
just pay attention to the domain restriction on tangent
whooaaa yeah
I still don't get it sowwy
everyone
draw a triangle...
to z
where a is the adjacent side to theta
and b is the opposite
you have that tan(theta) = opp/adj =b/a
hence theta= arctan(b/a)
pretty simple...
Hmm
I think you can understand this better visually...
For 2 and 3 try reflecting z over the y axis and find the supplementary angle of the argument of the new point
Explanation: trust me bro
notice that for the 3rd quadrant
we have -pi rotation already?
so the argument is theta-pi
Thank you so much!!
also to write z in its polar form
you just need to calculate arg(z) and |z|
and then plug it into $|z|e^{i\arg(z)}$
Enterlessguy
(|z|) is r
euler form*
that's usually called polar form at least in my experience
really?
you could define it that way but we always just used e^(i theta)
In Italy we call it exponential form lol
Amd this one trigonometric form
And z = a + ib algebraic form
There are so many names 🙈
In France it's the same. But we also can call |z|e^(iarg(z)) the exponential form.
By the way if you like the exponential form, you can solve : $$\arg(z)\equiv\arg(z^2+i)\ [2\pi]$$
gottawakup
In India(especially in tamil nadu) too
what do I right for the limit as x approaches infinity for the sin, cos and tan functions?
i know it has no limit because y never reaches a certain point but I just wrote
lim x -> inf, y = NL
and at the top wrote NL = no limit
Is tehre a formal way to write this
they way i've seen it written is $\lim_{x \to \infty} \sin x$ does not exist'' or $\lim_{x \to \infty} \sin x$ DNE'' but how you write it isn't super important
cloud
okay, thanks 🙏
How would you find the interval of a piecewise function
Like how do I find it for this graph
(I’m talking about increasing/decreasing interval)
Increasing = positive slope
Decreasing = negative slope
Yeah but for piecewise functions what would that look like
Because this one has 3 functions
So 3 diff intervals right
It works the same for analytic functions


