#precalculus
1 messages ยท Page 63 of 1
how solve ๐ญ . just part ii and iii,
I know how to do ii, its just the answers were different from what i got. thanks in advance for anyone who helps me
dont worry about the above question anymore, i got it
Stop bullying
thatโs not bullying. but like actually though what is that
(Iโm joking but u should learn how to draw it properly)
For part d which function on f(x) do i sub f(a)=90? Both or...
This is a poor question on multiple parts.
- It says the function is defined on all real numbers but g(4) is not defined
- g(x) is a function
check if either work. see what u find. Remember to check if it satisfies the domain restriction of the piece
Can't you assume that the sphere is instead a cube
and end up with the same ratios
since the linear dimension ratio would be the same either way
alright i tested and it seems to work

When it comes to graphs, I donโt understand really how to plot it when it comes to the piโs
is there anyway to solve systems easier?
๐ค its called a period not a cycle
also for tangent period is pi not 2pi
Systems of linear equations! Matrices
Row reduction is just solving simultaneously except you don't write x, y, z
But you could also find the inverse matrix of the coefficients of x, y, z and multiply both sides by the inverse matrix
if you have to show all your steps matrices become a pain
it takes so long
Matrices are a shortcut actually
The problem is that 3x3 takes a long time regardless of your method
Never mind 4x4 and 5x5
Also there's Cramer's rule, maybe you find that easier
i havent learned that ๐ญ
i learned gaussian that was about it
can u teach me how to do that?
Search on YT, org chem tutor
Eddie woo is best tutor of maths on yt imo
does this work wwith nonlinear systems?
can someone explain how this is an arithmetic sequence:
log base 3 of x, log base 3 of (x/3), log base 3 of (x/9), where x > 0.
Usually nonlinear systems can't be solved with matrices unless they can be transformed to a linear system.
can the second and third terms be written in a different way with log laws?
OHHH
log base 3 of x - log base 3 of 3, log base 3 of x - log base 3 of 9
??
yep, and then the log_3(9) can also be written as log_3(3^2)=2log_3(3)
oh that makes so much more sense now
After that rewriting I hope it looks a bit more clear why its arithmetic
yeah
awesome
tysm
Not in general
Specify a type of 'nice' non-linear systems and I might be able to tell you
x^2+y^2=9
log (10x)=6y
That's just one equation
Well all solutions are given by x = 3 cos t and y = 3 sin t
would recommend 3blue1brown and not org chem tutor since he doesnt explain why it works and just gives formulas to memorize
,w x^2 + y^2 = 9 and log_10 (10x) = 6y
yeah a lot of equations don't have an analytical solution
everything you have learned so far just happens to be one of the few types of solvable systems of equations
because you can substitute in y = x + constant and get a quadratic in x, and so on
you can only determine that there must be exactly two solutions (WA has plotted this wrong; there is one more intersection where x is positive and very close to 0)
given the shape of a circle and any logarithmic function
what did you do?
pls someone hurry
ive done d first part
which is -4.9
my problem is how to compare it to the graph
and how do i compare the tangentto the sope pls someone
slope
Wdym
Hi
I want someone to give me a Precal. equation that is considered simple for me to try and solve
I'm in Alg. 2 but I want a challenge
precalc is basically supposed to be algebra 2 but with a bit more 
a bit more
?
it's mostly a review of algebra but with a few new functions introduced - exponential, log, and trig
there aren't really new types of algebra equations for you to try that don't make use of the new kinds of functions
Precalc is a big waste of a year imo
Does f: Z -> R mean a function takes integer input and outputs real number?
especially if u donโt do like trigonometry with complex numbers or basic vectors/matrices
i agree
or even a semester
๐
i jus skipped it and its fine :l
yes. Though it could potentially only output rational numbers or integers, and still have codomain R
in the function f(x)={4x^2+x-5, x<4 | kx^2-6x+7, x>=4}, which value of k makes the function continuous?
not any question i need an answer for, it's just a practice problem
hint: see what value 4x^2 + x - 5 would have at the "change of definition point" x = 4
then find k to ensure the other expression takes that same value at that point
U did a masters in math?
I did
how much harder is what, getting a masters in math?
Yes how much harder is getting masters in math
Than doing calc 4
I think in masters u just do proofs so its probably 10/10 harder
uhh yeah I don't know how to quantify this but it's a lot harder, of course. You're comparing a single class that undergrads take, to a multiple year program where you have to pass a bunch of harder classes and take qual exams
calc 4 being differential equations?
probably multivariable calc
No line integrals surface integrals and volume integrals
oh
Sphirecal integrals
then whats calc 3?
And cylindreical
oh i guess they split it into actual multivariable and vector
Series sequence and alittle intergation
Also divergence and cinvergence
oh what
what's calc 2 then?
Idk i didnt take calc 2
๐
interesting
But calc 4 is the hardest math i took so idk how to compare
how much harder is passing high school than passing algebra
๐
Not much
I will say, not all classes of a masters program are necessarily harder than all undergrad classes
but it comes down a lot to what you personally find hard
i meant, thats kinda how your question sounds ๐ญ
except its not probably the same but :l
Oh but i was able to give u an answer
strange
Makes sense why did u do masters in math btw
For fun
Or
Does it open something
if someone is getting a degree for fun they must be omega rich and want to dedicate a LOT of time to it ๐
well, I wanted to get a PhD and become a mathematician, but that plan went seriously wrong. I'm lucky that I happened to complete the requirements for a masters while working toward that
๐
What went wrong
If u dont mind me asking
Also dont phd problems take around 14+ days to solve each
my self confidence went downhill and I developed a serious substance and gambling problem
That doesnt sound fun 
But gambling is just math shouldnt u win every casino u enter
most casinos games can't be beaten with math
I thought I had an edge in poker
I was sorely wrong
Every probability can be beaten with math
๐
no offense but you don't seem to know what you're talking about
fr ๐
Theres a story about a person who studied probability alot
And won big
Got banned from las vegas tho
it's possible to get an edge at counting cards in blackjack. That's pretty much it for casino floor games
without cheating
But yeah in casino they rig the probabilities so u cant really win
What about horse racing
U could win if u do alot of math ๐ญ
Dont gamble tho
bro is going to mathematically determine how fast one horse is going to run
Lmaooo
No u can determine other factors
The probability of each horse winning
I vaguely recall hearing a story about someone who actually did make a killing on horse races
Yes its the same dude who got banned from las vegas
but I wouldn't count on being able to replicate their results
He got a team
the odds are against you though lol
And started winning multiple horse race bets
Probably yeah gambling as a whole is bad
propaganda
๐
they just donโt want you to make money bro
Yep
Why would they lol
The point of gambling is to trick people into thinking they can win
nah
๐โโ๏ธ
thatโs the point of anti gambling sentiment, to trick people into thinking they canโt win
I teach and tutor math
14+ days lmao
Ooo tutoring gives alot of money
something like that
Yes proofs suck
Well
No we still need nerds to do them
So we can advance
you missed the joke
I did
it can take like 8 years to get a phd
not just two weeks
it depends on if you mean homework question or research question
yea lol
Research questions
Take
6-12months
Lol
U gotta read so many articles and etc etc
Overall only do phd if you absolutely love math otherwise the effort aint worth it D :
are you speaking from experience?
My fathers doing a phd so i check his work
Or like
He shows me what he does
in what
math?
I thought research was an action you do in any subject to get a degree, i didnt know you get a degree in research...
Good point
๐
Yeah idk even if he told me on whay id forget the next day
lol what
masters thesis?
how do you not know what general field itโs in?
or is there phd thesis too
Phd thesis
the heck ๐
bro what
I never asked ๐ญ ๐ญ
@jovial hare
U will be able to teach in uni with a phd
But
Thats 5 + 5 + 8
18 years
Could be 3 for undergrad
bro i have no idea what youโre even saying
Im talking about twaching in universities
The requirment
oh heavenly mathcord, since you solve all my problems
please tell me where did i misplace my eraser 
BAHAHAHAHAHHA
Get a tablet and write digitally
Best upgrade ever
i doth not mean what i wrote ๐
i cant speak regular english let alone old english
no seriously tho where did my good eraser go
ur right
lets use the logarithm function to determine where my eraser went
logarithm base eraser
๐ญ
Im bored
I thought id find easier homeworks when i joined
All i see is stuff i dont ever want to see in class
I FOUND IT
Hiii
i found your alt bro
@ebon tangle
Yes
What are you implying
nothing
๐
Are you bullying me again
love this guy

AIDS
Thank you. Yes itโs me
,av adodo6737
goes so hard
Ikr
Leave the kid alone wtf ๐ญ
Well
we donโt really know
๐ญ
he took calc 4
i stopped being a kid when i was 7 
damn bruh
what major u?
Worth it tho imma need my money up
Electrical engineering
barnacle boy
For a uni with 1.2k engineers
Having only 16 electrical engineers
Is weird
what about LA/ode?
Diffrential equations?
I took that as well
But
That isnt hard
Well none of the courses are u just need to study daily
๐
Occasionally observe how care free buisness majors are
when do i need to check my solutions when im solving trig equations?
your question is too general 
like sometimes when i solve trig equations some of my solutions dont work or result in like an undefined answer
but usually most of my solutions work
you'd want to check your solutions when you do a step that changes the domain/possible solutions
would squaring both sides lead to changing the domain
i say "domain" loosely but yeah it changes the possible values of the squared result (it doesn't change the possible values that go into it though)
like for example,
if you have an equation y = -x
and you square both sides, then you have y^2 = x^2
(x,y) = (1,1) satisfies the second equation but not the first equation, so you could see that squaring both sides of the equation would not have the exact same (x,y) points (it has more in this case)
as an example
so first you'd want to solve for sin(4x) obv ri
my answer key said this but im confused on how it would be pi- and 2pi+ cause i thought the arcsin value would be in the fourth quadrant
and also i dont get why it would still be +2pi n
so you have sin(4x) = -2/3
you know that if sin(u) = -2/3
one value is u = arcsin(-2/3)
since arcsin(x) has range of [-pi/2, pi/2], you know it has to be in the fourth quadrant yes
so you know that the values that satisfies sin(u) = -2/3 would be u = arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi*n for any integer n (since arcsin(-2/3) is a solution, and adding/subtracting factors of 2pi just brings you around the circle to the same place)
but you also have the identity sin(u) = -sin(pi-u), so sin(arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi n) = -sin( pi - [arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi n]),
so another solution to sin(u) = -2/3 is -(pi - [arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi n]) which simplifies to -pi + arcsin(2/3) + 2pi n = pi - arcsin(2/3) + 2pi n
so since u = 4x, x = u/4, so you get
x = (arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi n)/4, (pi - arcsin(2/3) + 2pi n)/4 for all integers n
probably too much idk how to explain, is there something about this that is confusing xD
o shoot that makes hella sense actually
oh kewl
yea i see where i went wrong in my thinking
also cause im blind and i didnt realize it was ()/4
and btw, for each cycle, sin(x) = sin(pi - x) are the only two things you can put into sine and get the same thing...
idk how to say that better ๐
you can see it picturing the unit circle
oh ๐
yea i usually picture unit circle
it were in quadrant one then it would be pi-u right
like the arcsin value
quadrant 3...
no like if i had a different arcsin value like arcsin(1/3) then the other answer is still pi-arcsin(1/3) right
u=arcsin(-2/3) is in quadrant 4, pi - u = pi - arcsin(-2/3) = pi + arcsin(2/3) is in quadrant 3
yes
and quadrant 3 and 4 are the only quadrants that have angle that satisfies sin(u) = -2/3 so yea
@winter comet wait one more thing
for cos and tan
is it also pi- or is it different
o
cuz cos(pi - u) = cos(u)
wait but u is negative in the previous problem so it would turn to pi+u no?
hmm wait i musta gone wrong smwhere
ok i fixed it
wait so is my teachers answer key wrong
i mean i accidentally had pi + u, because double negative, but it shoulda actually been -pi - u, which if you add 2pi becomes pi - u
wait are you sure its -sin(u)
i tried opening sin(pi-u) and it just turned to sinu
๐ญ
u = arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi n
pi - u = pi - [arcsin(-2/3) + 2pi n]
are solutions
to sin(u) = -2/3
alr yea that makes sense
cos(x) = cos(pi - x) = cos(x - pi)
o shoot cause its an even function
alr alr
for tan would i just turn it into sin/cos
wait but wouldnt that just turn to sin(x-pi)/cos(x-pi) and sin(x-pi) is negative but cos(x-pi) is positive
which is equal to -tanx
ive gotta be hard tripping rn
wait but tan(x-pi) makes sense cause pi is a period
da fuq
wait @winter comet x-pi is -cos
cos(x-pi) = cos(pi-x) = cos(x)
tangent...
i was tryna graph on desmos just now and its not helping
wait but if you have an angle of x in quadrant one, and then take pi and subtract x, thats in quadrant 2
and then cos is negative
I think desmos is tripping, or im ultra mega giga tripping
yeah you're right
๐
mahn my brain
it makes sense now ๐ญ
yea i got hella confused too
cuz of me fr 
@modern lagoon Iโll help when u need
Come back to calculus chat bro

bro im in geometry/alg 2
Sowwy
come back
cool, how did you get in there
I forgor
did you like jump into it or

Now or uh
(ping)
A rabid rat will bite u
failed
here
AWA
owchie
im getting 3+4(-2^x) but its wrong and I dont know what im doing wrong lol
try writing $3 - 4(2^x)$
south
Hi guys for question 12 I'm getting a=3 ( when both completing the square and differentiating). But my textbook says a=11
Is my textbook wrong or is it me ;-;
Yeah i think its
3
Ah alright thx Inco!
what does one-to-one mean
does it mean something like the inverse of the function?
one-to-one means injective
so in the example,
\[ f(x)=x^2-6x+20 \]
and
\[ f(y)=3\pm\sqrt{y-11} \]
0_ื
ok so for that quadratic function to be injective, the domain must start from the vertex to either side of the parabola
yes, and other domains work (subsets of that one), like finite segments on one side that avoid the vertex
you could even have some segments from both sides of the vertex, as long as they have no y values in common on the parabola
i see
so what's the answer here, 3 or 11?
,w plot y=xยฒ-6x+20, from 3 to infinity
imma do it in desmos
the answer to what question?
btw if you enter your equation to desmos with {3 <= x} after it, it'll only graph it on that domain
the question in number 12
yeah because $y \ge 11$
south
your textbook messed up
Thanks south!
how to solve 2^x = x^2 using algebra ?
unfortunately there's not really a way
we define a special function to solve equations with exponentials and polynomials
it's pretty nasty
there's another real value of x that is not 2 nor 4
Range of the function y = 2^(x^2+2x-1)-2^(x^2+2x+1) with Domain of [-2, 1]
Explain all the details to understand, anyone can help ?
Hello, any resource for dominating the factorization? I've seen many methods of factorization in my last class but some of those results are a bit large and unnecessary, I want to learn one fast method that helps me in any problem
x method
and intuition
its the easiest and fastest imo
if you cant factor tho then youre just gonna have to use the quadratic equation or completing the square if you can
wdym โdominatingโ the factorization? And what r u looking to factorize
thereโs a lot more than just quadratics
Is the reason why I got the range for number 1 wrong because I didnโt apply the transformations to it?
orthogonal vectors have a dot product of 0
Yea but dumb question how is that 0
Wait
Im actually a dumbass
Whats the dot product?
I genuinely stupid
Nah ur good
Anyone know how to get domain of trig function ๐ญ
sine and cosine: all real numbers. Other ones: anywhere their denominator doesn't equal 0
Maybe all the algebra of baldor?
How do I convert ax^2+bx+c to the quadratic formula?
complete the square
Nah
any ideas?
completing the square means to manipulate the equation such that part of it becomes a square of a binomial
,,(a\pm b)^2=a^2\pm2ab+b^2
0_ื
Parentheses for (ax^2+bx)
why?
Thatโs the way to complete the square
adding parenthesis doesnโt do anything in itself, but ok. so try to complete the square
yall
im taking geometry and algebra II rightg now is precalc rly hard
im gonna be taking it as a sophomore
not rlly I donโt think so
precalc kinda seems like a waste of a year imo
im taking ap stats and precalc concurrently then calc ab then calc bc
I thought u said u r doing geometry and alg ii
No i meant next year
this year
geometry and algebra II
next year pre calc and ap stats
what year r u
Junior
what math
ap calc bc
yeah
how??
what does that mean
i kmeant bro
My school offers it
what did u take freshman year
geometry
you don't really need precalc. . .
where i live
and you def dont need ab for bc
its a prerequisite
ap calc is rlly not that hard like the ap makes things very easy im being honest. thatโs not to say of course that some things in calc arenโt hard of course but the ap is easy
algebra
algebra II right
calc bc repeats the concepts in calc ab
yeah
in some places
cuz he doesnt have more prequisites ๐
i feel like many places don't require it
๐
it is for him apparently
DOES IT SAY THAT
i think some schools do
WHAT KIND OF SCHOOLS YLALO BE GOING TO BROP
did you actually read for sure that ab is prereq to bc?
bro the first semester of bc is just ab
calc bc is basically what it would look like for you to take calc 1 and 2 in college
I donโt think ap calc bc does like hard integration at all
AP calculus ab Prerequisite pre-calculus it says
yea
ab is one whole year of calc 1
๐
and calc ab for bc
it isn't usually but ig it is at your school :l
i mean you get more math experience lol
uhh idk about that
minus all of the proofs/intuition for things
you get more differentiation experience
calc 1 and 2 in college doesnt have proofs or intuition either
if you want proofs concerning calculus topics, take analysis later on
so after calc ab and bc wgat ckases r thgere
like for math in college?
yea
multivariable, diff eq, linear algebra, discrete...
bruh. calc 1 and 2 are rlly something a middle schooler could do then if thatโs the case
i guess real analysis in there too
yeah these are the last four "easy" math classes
after bc yeah
nah analysis and algebra are their own things
i was tryna list things that only have prereq of calc 2
i see
not generally true
cuz contour integrals are line integrals lol
but a smarter kid could i guess
RA has calc 3 as a prereq
they could but they usually don't lol
or well
oh
its not called real analysis in college usually
i wouldnt know its not offered here XD
lol fair enough
just memorize the basic integration rules, the derivative rules, etc
ahh
so calc is like meh not rigoruos, analysis is like pretty rigorous and then real analysis is like ultra gigachad rigorous?
๐
analysis is very rigorous
RA isnt necessarily more rigorous
it just looks at more stuff
ahh
like measure theory
idk what those are
is says on colllege board website calc ab is equi`valent to a first semester college calc course in differential and integral calc and that calc bc is equivalent to a firts semeseter college calc course and subsequent single variable calc course
oh
why is analysis not just calc
i remember reading abt it somewhere ๐
yes exactly
for analysis of some sort
which is why ab is not a prereq
ab is a slower version of bc
that covers half as much
yeah ive never heard
what year are u
heres what a.i. said it was, used for limits ๐
11
i see
oh
i think they used cluster points to define a limit of a sequence maybe? or something idk
its what it seems like to me but idk what im talking about 
Vicious aren't you a math major-
The more questions I ask the more questions I shall have.
no, where'd you get that idea from 
You know so much-
Meths
Maths*
And you have the undergraduate role ๐ญ
thats cuz the math i study is considered undergraduate math by this server ๐
and they said take the role of what you studyin or whatever
Omg this pic is so crispy
anyway uh
Fr
when i saw this it reminded me of this vid โ ๏ธ
CHECK THE PINNED COMMENT. I made a pretty serious mistake in this video, but then I also think Gege made this mistake. So I think the video is still alright and I'll leave it up.
So yeah, a bit of a sillier video this time. I had with the idea to try to explain the Epsilon-Delta definition of a limit using Gojo's infinity, and this is what I ca...
yo from these topics, what should i focus on the most for calculus ???
all of them 
but especially the first 4
or 5
radical expressions are somewhat less commonly needed
ok thanks ๐
so in my first ( and only) calculus class my teacher told us that we shouldnt treat (d/dx) as a fraction but as a function. So how is this allowed
Is not rigorous but a convenience. Here you should integrate respect x on both sides of df/dx=g so int df/dx dx is just f(x) by Fundamental theorem of calculus
technically d/dx is not a fraction, but it behaves like one through the rigorous proofs mathematicians have come up with
you actualy have dx/dy = 1/(dy/dx) and so on
dy/dx * dx/dt = dy/dt, well these are applications of the chain rule
Hi here with question 6 the Inductive step is it necessary for me to factor out what I got?
Or can I just leave it the way it is.
excuse me what website is that?
you showed that your result equals the expected result (from induction), even though you didn't explicitly write the correlation...
like i would try to make it even more obvious but the logic is there so. . .
I mean you could just for the sake of making the point clear, but the induction here is pretty much done (although if you're writing it as a proof you'd need to show things better)
Aleks
,rccw
what is the value of the function at x = 2? what is the value of the limit as x approaches 2?
2, approaches from diff values
Dne
so if the limit does not exist, what does that say about whether the function is continuous?
Discontinutyt at 2
yes, it is discontinuous
Whole thing right? Except intersection?
wdym by "whole thing except intersection"?
Wait nvm on that
I was buggin
What abiut this numma 67
,rccw
Yea I am just confused how to get a and b here I know how to do for ex 63
you are trying to find a and b to make it continuous?
Yes
so think about where it might be discontinuous
Ok
Hey Im bored of highschool grade 9.
Polynomials and Exponents.
Because you need algebra and trignometry.
can someone check if i got the right answer?
answers i got:
T_A_ = 4217.8269 lbs
T_B_ = 2108.9117 lbs
thank you
how much do i really need to know about rations fractions and percentages to be ready for calculus?
these have always been my weakness
How would I go about finding the maximum and minimum value of something like
7sinA + 24cosA
Divide by 25 (then remember to multiply by 25) first
Now can you find a theta such that cos theta = 7/25 and sin theta = 24/25?
Oh I see thanks Viper! ( I'll just expand the expected result.
)
AYO ANYONE UP I NEED HELP
yeah?
guys i need to compute the 3 ans for the cube root of -27i
So I thought that I would try to use the method of polar form In order to compute this cubic root
But I'm having a small problem
When I try to compute the theta
I'm using the formula theta = arctan(y/x)
hence it gives arctan(0)
this gives the theta as 0
but after looking at this solution the theta should be -pi/2 in order to give the correct answer
wait i should have specified my q
i need 3 different ans
of the cube root
otherwise yea i would have done 3i directly XD
@halcyon yew
because the period of tan(x) is pi radians
how pi/2
3e^(ipi/6), 3e^(3ipi/6), and 3e^(5ipi/6)
your answer will only be correct to the nearest multiple of pi
because i = e^(ipi/2)
just use your brain, the argument of real number * -i is 3pi/2
This is all of the working I have done till now
and -27/0 is not 0
it's undefined
welp yea you are right
undefined means either pi/2 or 3pi/2
no worries
now give me my rep even though that doesn't exist on this server
yea this server doesnt have rep iirc
how did you get.
(3ipi/6), and (5ipi/6)
because
uhh because I did something wrong
i = e^(ipi/2) = e^(ipi/2 + 2ipi) = e^(ipi/2 + 4ipi)
so it should be
5/6 and 9/6
implicit differentiation
you've differentiated the expression with respect to x, which involves treating y as a function of x
ohh tyy
Hello guys
Could someone help me find the derivative of (x-1)/xยฒ
Pls explain too
Idk why I'm not able to do it
๐๐๐
just split the fraction and it should be easier
,iamnot dy
Removed the studying! role from you.
@sleek dome
Rewrite the fraction as multiplication.
E.g., (1/x^2) = x^(-2)
Oh shit
It was that easy
Omfg
How did I not see that
I'm so fucking sorry guys
Sorry
๐๐๐
Thanks tho
Guys I'm so dumb
I might kms
How did I not see that
Bye
๐๐๐
Anyway, this is my solution to @sleek dome's problem.
I thank you for opening my eyes
Idk how my brain decided to commit suicide
Does anyone know why B is wrong? (Also ik that the derivative of option A is wrong but its still 1>0 in the correct ver)
,rotate
youโve just said it was undefined
I mean if 2nd deriv equals to 0 or undefined wouldnt it mean it has no local extrema?
Like the answer key says only C is correct but im just asking about what makes B wrong? Because from what i know if second deriv has a positive or negative number as a result then it has a local extrema
it means the second derivative test is inconclusive
sure but division by zero isnโt defined and thus since the second derivative doesnโt exist itโs not a positive or negative number
Hey does anyone offer one on one tutoring? Iโm doing pre calculus as a pre requisite for an engineering program and struggle with most of the concepts
Iโm doing it online with Khan Academy and through my university
I think soliciting and advertising paid tutoring is against the rules here
dawg
nobody said paid...
For question 9a can the range be worked out like this?
x>-3
x+3>0
(x+3)^3-1>-1
qp(x)>-1
Does qp mean multuply them
no, it means composition
it's short for q(p(x))
yeah that tracks
Oh
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
uh wait actually
where did you get that integral? looks quite ugly and potentially not even doable in an elementary fashion LMAO
ayyy ann is back
that i am indeed
my classmate once asked me๐
your classmate wanted you to suffer
๐
i tried hard,but couldn't find the solution ๐ฆ
yeah i dont think thats your fault then
i threw it into WA and it tried to give me some kind of infinite series thats not even a power series in anything
which you know is a bad sign โ ๏ธ
๐
,w integrate lnx/cosx
bro,can u solve it?
yeah,
ah alright thx so much Ann
viper where is ur pfp from it looks familiar...
one piece
yes way :>
โ ๏ธ
๐
i got some catching up to do
lol
wouldn't expect it to be recognized ๐
skypiea
you know what let me stop questioning
js trust frfr
naw
hopefully one piece can run for another 1k episodes its too short
fr
i wish bro 
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
Sigma bot
Does the word "derivative" ring you any bell?
nopee, our teacher ain't even mention that
so there is other formulas to solve this equation?
Yes, the derivative
Can someone check if this is correct?
Interval of convex: ]1, postive infinity[
Interval of concave: ]negative infinity, 1[
i think you have them exactly backwards
ie you have the words "concave" and "convex" switched around
g would be a piecewise function
$g(x) = \begin{cases} 4x+12 & -5 \leq x \leq 0 \ -\tfrac12 x + 12 & 0 < x \leq 14\end{cases}$
ann.in.a.teacup
oh thanks @willow bear
I dont know but my book says its like this wait lrt me show you;
Are the intervals that i sent correct tho
thats... odd actually
Is it possible to memorize the Unit circle
yes , it is possible
I had to remember and memorize it when I was in high school because my teacher didnโt allow us to use the unit circle diagram as reference during tests
From my experience, understanding the graph of the unit circle as a whole (ex: which angles have both positive x and y points? Which angles have both negative x and y points?, etc.) and knowing how the values look like (ex: the angles and how they are placed in the graph ) made the memorization way less complicated than it looks
For example: when you know what 45 degrees look like and you also know that itโs in the 1st quadrant of the graph, then it will also come to mind that its x and y values are both positive
possible? yes. worth it? not really, imo.
I'm watching this, I dont understand how y = e^x looks and is described like it is at this timestamp: https://youtu.be/JrWJnwCMlP0?list=PL0o_zxa4K1BU5sTWZ2YxFhpXwsnMfMke7&t=735
Cant e and x be anything? if e is 0 and x is -1, it would be 0, but apparently not...
This precalculus introduction / basic overview video review lesson tutorial explains how to graph parent functions with transformations and how to write the domain and range using interval notation.
Functions - Free Formula Sheet: https://bit.ly/3Ai8NZv
Domain and Range - Free Formula Sheet:
https://bit.ly/4eheN2W
Functions - Video ...
e is a constant
it is around 2.7
just like pi 3.14
whenever you are raising to the power of something a positive number it can never get negative
e^-100 for example would just be rewritten as 1/e^100
which is a very small number close to 0
but not quite
if you go very very far back you can say that the lim as x approaches -inf is 0
whereas if exponent gets bigger it gets big wayy faster
bigger the exponent way bigger the number gets
okay, so e is a known constant with a set value like PI? then it makes sense why it doesnt yield a negative number that way.
but could you explain why a negative exponent cant yield a negative result? ofc. i understand that ex. 2^3 is 2 * 2 * 2, but how would this be written with 2^-3?
the negative in the exponent makes it a fraction
cause it cant be -2 * -2 * -2 ofc
but why? i get its a rule, but could you explain the rule?
if you were to do it normally it would yield to 1/2
using quotient rule btw
or whatever it is called
what did you get 2^2 from?
yeah, but what does this have to do with a negative exponent?
ah then we get a negative exp
okay, let me think for a sec
yea thats that
ok lemme think if i really understand this
let bro cook
yeah i see, if you follow the quotinent rule and have this:
x^-3
Then to get that, you can use any 2 numbers which would yield that ex:
x^(3-6)
you could rewrite that to this using the rule:
(2^3) / (2^6)
which would yield the same result as x^-3
I now see how it works.
But now i just gotta wrap my head around it more and figure out why this is, if you get why i mean. Like, why is the rule like it is... how did someone figure it out
embarassing how i dont know this stuff but work with 3d rendering and use vector/matrix math every week lol
trying to learn calculus, but i have so much stuff to learn before lol
not at all embarassing
people assume true some of the fundamental stuff
yet when someone asks to explain it they are perplexed
like the delta epsilon definition of limit i doubt everyone understood it properly and just memorized instead of comprehending the logic behind it
could you explain the quotinent rule a bit more? like how i could understand it? all examples when i google seems to explain it using derivatives which i dont know
are you talking about the exponent thing or derivative?
the one you posted
in the end it's basically a simplification
you could write it out entirely 2^5 and 2^2
simplify top and bottom and you get the "answer"
happens because the number on the exponent represents how many 2s there are
so whenever you simplify the number goes down
hm, english isnt my first language, what do you mean by simplifieng the top and bottom?
you mean that the -3 exponent is a simplification?
(2*2)/2 for example
you can cancel out one two on top and one on the bottom
(2)/1
(this was (2^2)/(2^1)
we removed 1 two on top and one on the bottom
(2^1)/(2^0)
the exponent represents how many 2s there are
ive always had a problem understanding how that works. i guess i just have to start thinking of division as ratios instead of just an expression?
hmmm think about let's say 1/2
it's the same thing as saying 2/4
or 4/8
yeah exactly
or 8/16
it makes much more sense than just looking at the numbers themselves
we generally want a simplified answer
so hmm lemme think not too sure how to explain it
hm could you explain this? isnt x/2^0 undefined?
2^0 is equal to 1
oh
okay
i guess we'll have to go down that rabbit hole too? XD
think about 2/2
i have a bunch of courses on khans academy i plan to go through, but it just feels like idk where to begin to learn the stuff for the next course
ah, you got 2^1-1 using the quotinent law?
what did you get 2^-1 from?
just a random example to make it 0
in the product we sum the exponents
2^(1-1)
very similar to quotient
and with the quotinent law we subtract?
okay, i see how you get 2^0 then.
yes
let's use another example
2^2 * 2^5
expanding it
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2
we have 7 2s
so 2^7
the exponent tells how many 2s we have
at the end we have 7 2s