#precalculus
1 messages · Page 62 of 1
Okay lets start with the known identified sides
6.2 and 9.2
If you want to scale 6.2 to 9.2 what do you multiply by?
4.4?
Why?
Because we used 4.4 to scale 9.2 and 6.2 for y
Well okay lets try scaling 6.2 by 4.4.
Does that give us 9.2?
No
6.2+4.4 10.6
Well okay
Thats not what I mean by scale
6.2*4.4 27.28
I mean dialate yeah
Thats clearly not it
So 4.4 isnt the scaling factor
However what about 6.2*(9.2/6.2)
Are you putting this into a calculator?
Yes
You shouldnt
Infact you should be able to know what that is faster than any calculator
This is precalc so youve taken algebra right?
Yes
What is a/a for any variable a?
I give up
I don’t understand this shit
?
I’m sorry
I’m trying
I just don’t understand this
It doesnt seem like you are trying to me
oh
Im unsure what there is to give up on when I am answering questions
Dude
I dont understand anything about this problem
Thats why I am trying to explain it
You haven’t questioned my explanations yet
e^x is not a constant. It is an exponential function
you can solve this by taking a formula when you f(x)=e^x f'(x)=e^x x' so it that case e^x times 1 equals e^x thats why ots the same as the base function
im assuming u used chain rule there, but in order to use chain rule, you have used the derivative of e^x. :)
theres a method i did in school that used some goofing around with derivatives to find the derivatives of functions such as sin-1(x), e^x, etc
Why do you think its a constant?
For part b how do i know if the sum is correct when subbing n=60 into Σr and Σr^2 respectively and adding them, must the result be 3660? (60 x 61 =3660)
book doesnt have ms
clearly the sum is larger than 60 * 61
given that 60 * 61 is one of the terms and there are 59 other positive terms being added to this
so you would need to sub n = 60 into n(n + 1)/2 + n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6
yah i got 75640
also hi south
how's uni
,w n(n + 1)/2 + n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6 when n = 60
good
Do you still study math on the side. (You said you stopped majoring in math)
nah stopped studying it at uni
so i took a test for precalc 1 that let me skip it and i passed it but one of the questions i have never learned and i still dont understand it
Properties of logarithms are:
- log(a^b)=blog(a)
- log(ab)=log(a)+log(b) and log(a/b)=log(a)-log(b)
Using this ones you can solve the exercise
ok thank you!
ye r u talking about the big formula with the limit of x reahces 0
what do you study?
Can someone just give me a quick check on this?
For question 1?
Can u write down your answer
It's not very clear in the shade
Or that might just be my eye sight
f+g={(1,5),(2,8),(3,-3),(4,5)}
All I would need is your logic
I think my logic is wrong
My logic is I just took the x values that they have in common and added the corresponding y values
Do you see anything there obviously wrong?
f+g={(2,2),(5,1),(6,1)}.
So what'd you do there?
You can’t just add ( y )-values for matching ( x )-values. Instead, check if ( f(x) )’s output is in ( g )’s domain and follow the composition rule.
Zoty
Why would I use the composition rule when there's no composition? Or do I just not know the rule
I'm doing precalculus next year, and want to start getting ready. Are there any resources or topics I should look at?
sociology
You must be stupid
I study that too
Idk
you have it right
Alright thanks
f+g should have the same domain as that of f and g as much as possible; since they're different here, taking their intersection is the only thing that makes sense
can someone give a really really hard pre calc review/ practice for semester 1
i’m looking for reviews but they are all easy questions that wouldn’t be on the test
I can give you a fun, not too easy problem
but I don’t know a good challenging full review off the top of my head
Suppose $m$ and $b$ are real numbers such that the equations $x^2 + (mx + b)^2 = 1$ and $(x-3)^2 + (mx + b - 1)^2 = 1$ have repeated roots $x_1$ and $x_2$, respectively. Then how many distinct lines $y = mx + b$ exist?
ManifoldCuriosity
ok thank you
is repeated roots repeated zeroes
yeah
sorry how do you do it im kinda lost
this is what i have i was thinking you would find what m and b values can make zeroes and then use that but ik thats wrong bc there are infinitely many
A hint: try working on just one of the equations at first, think about what kind of equation/graph it is (think of m and b as constants) and see if you can find some requirements for m and b, so that it has a repeated root
once you find something and then get stuck, do the same with the other equation
for the record it's a lot of algebra, but you did ask for really really hard 
I don't think it's super hard, but rather tedious to do by hand
nah idk what its called i just did it
it looks like you correctly set the discriminant of the first equation to 0, but there's an error when you multiply out terms
you should get b^2 = m^2 + 1 from that part
I forget the details of how to solve it from there
but there's a cool geometric significance in the result
I think you have a sign error too
should be 4m^2 - 4b^2 + 4 = 0
but the algebra is a real mess from there
I haven't checked the rest you did, I've been struggling to do it again myself
I think it's possible to avoid all these calculations to just answer the question of how many lines there are, with some slick argument. But if you want to actually find those lines it's gross
here's the cool way to answer the question, without actually finding the lines:
||Make the substitution y = mx+b into the equations to get x^2 + y^2 = 1 and (x-3)^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1, a pair of unit circles.
The roots of the parabola x^2 + (mx + b)^2 = 1 are also x locations of where the line y = mx + b intersects the circle x^2 + y^2 = 1, and similarly for the other parabola and circle. (This takes some thinking to convince yourself of).
Therefore, the parabolas having double roots means the line y = mx + b intersects both circles in only 1 point each!
So the answer is there are 4 such lines - the 4 lines that are mutually tangent to the two circles.||
heard it from someone on discord
What did I do wrong for 8a? ( I tried solving the cubic equation but realized I'd get an imaginary solution)
you split the sum of r^2 - 1 into two sums incorrectly, the upper bound ended up being 1 instead of n
Ah I see. Thanks so much Transparent
how so?
Try the equation 3(x²-2.5x+1)
oh, well I guess blame the question for not specifying
1+2a+b=0 is a necessary condition, in that all quadratics satisfying this will have at least one root in (0, 1)
it is not a sufficient condition though, as there are other quadratics that also have this property
Yes
simplifing and factoring are the dumbest shit to ever grace my computer sceen when it comes to trig
lol
gyatt
EDIEEEEE WOOOOOOO
THE GOAAAAAATTTTTT
I HAVE FINALLY FOUND THE PERFECT PERSON TO TEACH ME MATH AND PHYSICS
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA GOOOOAAAAT I LOVE HIM SOOOO MUCHH AND I ONLY WATCHED 1 VIDEO
HE HAS EVERYTHING I HAVE EVER BEEN LOOKING FOR OMG
AHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I think am blessed by god
slide
Wdym?
Like whats the channel
What's the channel
W pfp
broo omg s2 of solo leveling is so peak. I hate having to wait every week for new episodes like ew
think ill switch to mangwa (or whatever its called)
yessir
The manga is really good
Broski just write Eddie woo math on YouTube
Switch on your brain
why so aggro lmao
Asked a simple question
No need to get so pressed
Thats a phrase my biology teacher used to say every day
But like if you already know his name is eddie woo, just search up his name bruh
I need help with No. 10(d), I've done it but got a wrong answer
Here is my working
I would actually be crying if they gave me a book like that
you want the area between the curves
so you would integrate x - (x^2 - 2x) dx from 0 to 3
where x - (x^2 - 2x) is the positive distance between the curves (which when integrating would give you positive area)
I believe you just integrated one curve (distance from the x-axis) instead rather than the positive distance between the two curves
uh what i do wrong here
Wait is this precalculus
I though it was calc
not really, its calculus yea
been telling my friends I am studying calculus
sometimes they do it in precalc tho 🤷♂️
Ahh lmao alright
-3 <= x <= 7 and 7 >=x can be condensed to x >= -3
i think you meant x <= -8 rather than x >= -8
i keep mixing up the x<=8 and x>=8 stuff
😂
sigh
x is positive when its les than or equal to -8 so x<= -8 yea 😔
jus gotta use brain a bit more or smthn fr fr
such helpful advice 
yuh
nice
is this right
that's where it is increasing...
☠️
💀
like its decreasing over this interval right
yes
cuz the tangent lines would have negative slope if you drew them anywhere on that interval
I would be crying if I had to find the area by hand 😭
so whats that interval :l
with integration is not bad ;-;
Sometimes i sleep next to my beloved graphing calculator
.....
XD
...
._. no
._.
Smallest numbers always at the left when writing a range, something to remember
uhh wut? u can say 6>y>0 or 0<y<6 (altho they arent correct)
you just cant say 0 > y > 6 😭
yus
sigh
Well true, but who tf does that
tru 
i have a 1 in 6 chance of getting it right
I think you should maybe use greater or equal to sign
nah it was right
deltamath
@willow skiff Yo south is that you bro?
Remember me?
From IB server 🤣
Did you get your IB diploma?
what did i mess up
the curve "bounces" off the x axis if the multiplicity of a root is even
and crosses through if that multiplicity is odd
so your regions between x = -3 and 0, as well as between 4 and 6, are wrong
How can you solve for the degree of vertical asymptote algebrically?
someone pls help me
I know on a graph you can see if both ends hit the same direction
yeah a long time ago by now
uni's going well, how about you?
Thats nice to hear
For me I didn’t get my diploma, so am doing a retake
i totally agree
Yessirrr
my question is why they removed pi
where
cengage
they removed Pi, because f'(x) is 0 there. And you want strictly increasing and decreasing conditions
In my math class we are doing sinisodials specifically syr cxr tyx but for radians and I am having trouble finding the right quadrant to put my triangle
it takes 2pi radians to go all the way around a circle
so if you only go 4pi/3 rad around the circle, you went (4pi/3) divided by 2pi -> 1/3 around the circle (1/3 of the circumference)
if you only go x radians around the circle, you go x/2pi of the circumference around the circle
I tried getting the answer for number one again which is -2 and I think I got it
you got the answer right but for the wrong reason 
oh i screwed up
i should have said 2/3 of the circumference
(4pi/3) / 2pi = 2/3
mb ;-;
but anyway the triangle should be in the third quadrant, 4pi/3 rad around the circle
you have it 2pi/3 around the circle but i typod 1/3 so thats mb ;-;
sec(2pi/3) happens to equal sec(4pi/3) but 💀
my teacher says to find the quadrant, if I did'tn say, by finding the least common denom, but then I get even more confused because two of what I have transformed could fit the bill
huh?
so the way my teacher wants us to do this by taking the radian version of the circle, 0pi,pi/2,pi,3pi/2 and 2pi, finding the least common denom of what is given, ex sec 4pi/3 and then finding the quadrant and then doing the triangle stuff and then getting the answe
what do you mean the least common denominator?
between what two fractions?
okay so lets say i'm solving for sec 4pi/3, since the radian versions of the circle don;t match it I would use the lcd, whitch I think would be 3 and then convert all the radians into something that could match it then that would hopefully find the quadrant
🤔
i'm sorry for not being very good at exaplaning
why not just say
"how much of 2pi is 4pi/3"
x * 2pi = 4pi/3
the answer is 2/3
go 2/3 around the unit circle, construct a triangle and find the hypotenuse/adjacent ratio
naw all good XD
i mean do you fully understand the process you described?
if you simplify the fraction they give you (which i think is what you mean by lcd),
then "convert all the radians into something that could match it"
something you could match it -> degrees? or a fraction of the circle's circumference? or what does this refer to
Okay so last unit we did what we were just talking about but with degrees
Now we are doing it with radians
we also can’t convert or use a calculator
Hey can someone help me with a simple bearing problem?

This is a question for ap pre calc
Or multiple ig
I posted in 2 other channels cuz I didn’t know there was a pre calc channel mb
sorry in advance if this is not the right chat box
Is anyone looking for M1 (Cambridge) basic notes? Feel free to knock if interested.
Hey I have a ti inspire cx ii and I want to get the x value of cosx~ -0.451 but it doesnt give me x
arccosine (-0.451)
if you dont know arccosine means cos^-1
Thank yiu
Guyd
does anyone know how to do this
I genuinly have no idea
Our teacher literally didn't teach this
And I have a whole packet of this due at 8 am in the morning
both are a graph of quadratic over quadratic function
but how do I find the equation
The first one is $$f(x)=\frac{2x(x+1))}{(x+5)(x-3)}$$
TargetVN
The way is to determine the denominator
the graph has 2 vertical asymptote x=-5 and x=3 so the denominator has to be (x+5)(x-3)
but what about the hole
oh, so that explains the hole
How do I do 8
it's the same thing, determine the denominator through the vertical asymptote then determine the numerator through the roots of y=0, multiply both denominator and numerator by (x-1) so that the graph can have a hole there (or simply to make the function undefined at x=1), then calculate lim f(x) when x-> 1 and complete the function
i even regraphed it on desmos
the 9th one is standard linear over linear function, which can be determined through VA, HA and zero. it has a hole, though, so do the same thing like what you did in the previous questions
the 10th one is linear over quadratic function, 2 VA, 1 HA, 1 zero and 1 hole
yeah its x-3
what about the rest
10th one
honestly idk how it's false
the HA is automatically y=0
oh
which is kinda pointless here
for the 11-15 one, it's best to factor stuff out
$$f(x)=\frac{x(x-1)}{x(x-1)(x+1)}$$
TargetVN
now you can see more clearly: no x-int, 1 y-int, 2 holes, 1 HA, 1 VA, domain is shown right on the denominator, and range is R \ {0}. To solve f(x) <= 0, you can graph it, but it is apparent that the inequality is reduced to 1/(x+1)<=0, so x<-1
?
yeah that's a lot, but trust me, everything is already shown right after factoring
^
oof
the holes are the terms appear on both denominator and numerator
at those point, the limit exists but the function is undefined
(1,0)?
x and x-1 appear on both denominator and numerator so those are where hole exists
limit of f(x) when x -> 0 is 1
and limit of f(x) when x->1 is 1/2
?
or simply cancel out those terms and treat f(x) as 1/(x+1)
(easier to understand that way)
how did you get the x values
just remember how we created the hole in the previous questions
What would the y - int be
oh yeah
its none, because it's undefined at x=0 (you could also say there's a hole at (0;1))
What would the HA be
y=0
oh okay
you determine the HA by calculating lim f(x) when x -> inf and x-> -inf
both the limits are 0, so y=0 is an HA
what does inf mean
abbreviation for infinity
domain is R \ {0;1;-1} because the function is only undefined at x=0, x=1 and x=-1
i was about to tell a second way to represent it
though, the suggested answer is still wrong (the domain)
yep that
range is R \ {0} or a different way:
TargetVN
What about the limits?
its basically just telling you to make a limit statement
for example of the 13rd one:
actually to be more precise, i recommend including both positive and negative infinity
Nah, the other one was the one we use
the one with lim
TargetVN
this is more precise because there are situations where both limits will be different
which creates 2 HA instead of 1 HA as usual
basically "lim f(x) when x -> somewhere"
for example, the hole at (0;1) would be like
TargetVN
gl
tyty
@tawny creek
One last question
what about 8 and 10
you said you couldnt see an issue
with what I wrot
i regraph the same thing in desmos and it gives the exact graph
Oh okay
so idk what did i miss
np
Are you in the U.S.
im in Vietnam
ohh alr
for me it is 1:14am
so I was gonna say good night
but I guess it would be mroning
or pm
actually
good afternoon
1:14pm
alr cya 👋🏽
hello guys
i didnt know that secondary schools did calculus
wdym?
like this chanell is meant for secondary school students right?
im like mid way through secondary school and i havent come across it nor have i seen anyone else do it and year 10 and year 11 dont do it and i know cause i saw their curriculam
i mean this channel is called precalculus
if you want calculus and beyond you can go those channels
wdym pre calculas
pre calc and calc are the same thing
no
its just a class for stuff before calculus like trig and stuff i dont really know
could be practically anything ngl 💀
it's a bunch of algebra, exponential functions and logarithms, and trig
meant to prepare you for calculus next
does linear algebra done right provide a full overview of linear algebra
im doing linear algebra on khan academy and it keeps redirecting me to precalculus for parrelelogram rules and stuff
btw what are logarithms used for
learning linear algebra without knowing logarithms? 
not that they’re logically required, just pretty strange
linear algebra done right is usually recommended for a second course in linear algebra. it contains all the necessary material, but a first-time student may find it difficult compared to more introductory-level textbooks like strang or anton
as for LADR, yes, it’s a full good book, but as mentioned above may be too difficult for you at this time
they’re the inverse of exponential functions. A lot of things have a logarithmic nature to them, for example our perception of pitch and loudness in sound
does it cover more material? or is it just the same material but deeper
cuz i havent gotten far but it seems to be just the same material deeper but idk if it does more :l
the main difference is a focus more on proofs than on calculations (although even a more calculation-based linear algebra text has more proofs than e.g. intro calculus)
so it won't really teach you how to do any calculations (it's assumed you know how to do those already), but it will show you how to prove the results that were handwaved in the calculation-based textbooks. and it will also go farther into some of the more conceptual material, but not cover any material of interest only to numerical linear algebra
yeah
ik what they are just not what theyre used for irl
wdym
most kids take calc 1 and 2 in 10th
i wouldn't say most but a lot yea
most people aren't particularly math people tho 
ah
can someone give me tips on graphing arccos and arcsin
lwk kinda lazy to actually learn it rn 😿
$\forall \phi \in \mathcal{D}, , \lim_{n \to \infty} \int f_n(x) \phi(x) dx = \int f(x) \phi(x) dx$
SELVATOR
me core
?
If I use 4 and 3 in 2πrh it gives 126
Can someone please explain why author chose 5 and 6 specifically
im in the uk so up to year 11 is secondary school and we dont do calc in secondary school we do it in college and sixthform
Ohh alr
In the U.S I guess it's diff
For us 9th starts hig school
in uk middle and high are the same school
This is plug and play tbh, look up properties of exponents and exponent notation to figure out how to apply those fractional exponents to their respective quantities
what is sixthform
1÷3 = 0.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333...
When we multiply it by 3
Equal = 0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999...
which means 1 - 0^+
4÷3 = 1.333333....

hello! does anyone have recommendations on where to go to learn precalc bc and calc bc?
is khan academy reliable? 😭
This doesn't sound correct. The average distance from a planet to the sun? Like there are 8 planets from the sun with all different distances, how can there be an average? Maybe I'm reading it wrong.
not the average of the set of distances of each planet
but the average distance for a planet (the distance varies since orbits are elliptical)
i assume thats what it means
yes, .9 repeating = 1
it surprises people because they're never told growing up that the same number can have different decimal forms, and it's not so obvious. But it's true
but the only way something like this can happen is with repeating 9s
(In our base 10 decimal system)
for another example, 0.49999... = 1/2
yes it's fine
anyone know anything about the general form of a transformed function
y = a*f(b(x-c)) + d
b is the horizontal shrink/stretch factor
to figure out the value for b its either 1/|b| or just |b|
so if im given say, f(-2x)
and asked to find b
is that 1/|2|
then apply the negative to indicate the reflection?
well, it's shrinking by 2 and also horizontally reflecting in that case
shrinking by 2 is like multiplying by 1/2 so maybe that's where your 1/|b| is from
it's a shrink if b > 1 and a stretch if 0 < b < 1
right, and if 0 > b then a reflection is applied
if im not mistaken
what if I was given 1/2f(1/2x) would that be a vertical shrink by a factor of 0.5 and a horizontal stretch by 2?
yup
okay wait I think I understand, to find "b" it's always going to be 1/|b| because 1/1/|2| = 2
so if I had a whole number, like 2 as my "b" then it would be 1/b which in this case is 1/2
just had an insane brain wave oh my god
then my next question, if I'm given a replacement, like y -> 4y can I set it up in an equation format? like 4y = f(x)
then that makes my "a" term = 1/4 so its gonna be 1/4f(x)?
yeah. In general solve for y and see how the numbers around f(x) end up
yo guys
I have ran into a slight conundrum
actually wait this is precalc not calc
wait where is the calc
so ssixth form is like college so year 12 and year 13 but its part of a secondary school years 7 to 11. so same premises same teachers same head teacher and so on.
there are also other sixth forms that are not part of a secondary school
sixth forms can be for adults too
Organic chemistry tutor is fire tbh
yeah
if you want a book try Princeton Review
also there's a huge skill differeence between AP precalc and AP Calc BC
YUHH ive been going through the uh new calculus video playlist rn 😭 💀
oop-
OKII thank you
yeah he's a W
FR
How?
at theta=0, what is the displacement from the ray it creates to the x-axis?
Wdym?
you understand that the ray they call P starts at the positive x-axis and rotates around counter-clockwise right?
Why counter clockwise
I did it clockwise
Oh wait
Mb
Yeh ur right
So like how do I interpreters graph works
What do the graphs mean
for every theta, there is a ray P that has a distance y from the x-axis and a distance x from the y-axis
so these graphs are what the y-values are per theta
is this makin sense or naw
what would be 1?
Y and X
Ohhhh
i mean the radius is 1...
Wait it’s always 1 right?
for this circle the radius is always 1 yes
based on the possible answers
Got u
yea
I think
what about when theta is pi/2 ?
Wait how
I guessed
Isn’t theta the right angle plus the extra part in the second part of the circle
when theta is really small, y is really small
(and when theta is 0, y is 0 and x is 1)
R u taking tangent of it?
Oh is theta that tiny red angle?
its a variable angle
you can make it however big you want, and it will have a corresponding y-value and x-value
it can be
So how is y=0
y=0 when theta=0
Is that a common rule?
when theta = 125 degrees, y is something different
are you familiar with sine and cosine?
Yes
y = sin(theta) for a unit circle, and x = cos(theta)
Yes
for theta starting at the positive x-axis
wdym
I think I get what u mean
Like the unit circle
Cis and sin values
When theta is 0
Cos and sin is 0
when theta is 0, y= sin(theta) = sin(0) = 0
but also when theta=0, x = cos(theta) = cos(0) = 1
x is the horizontal length and y is the vertical length here
Why is cos x 0=1
i mean can see that when theta is 0, the horizontal distance is 1... from the picture...
and the vertical distance is 0 :l
its like an infinitely small triangle but the height of the triangle is 0 so XD
I seee I though the p line is what we was talking about
ahh nono yea thats the radius and its always length 1
do you know what y is when theta=90 degrees?
1
yeah
so we know when theta=0, y=0 -> (theta,y) = (0,0)
and when theta = 90 deg = pi/2 radians, y =1 -> (theta, y) = (pi/2, 1)
right?
Yes
does any y-theta graph look like it has both of those points
Has points (0,1)
or better yet, does one look like a sine wave :P
(0,0) and (pi/2,1)
it’s a coordinate
mhm
Gotta
Ok soooA has it
What would I write for explaining
Why the other graphs are wron
g
?
yea
uhh
you could say when theta is pi/2, y is 1 and none of the graphs besides A has this attribute? or something idk
Ohhh ok tysm
Wait
Sorry
Why did we choose pi/2
Out of the other points
pi/2 radians is 90 degrees, kind of an arbitrary choice but easy to work with
I kind of specifically picked it because i could see the other graphs didn't have it 
But graph d has it?
at pi/2, y is 0 for graph d
@winter comet help
Hello
you can just plot y = cos(x) on Desmos to find out the shape of the graph
go back to your notes to find out what cos(theta) represents on the unit circle
is it x or is it y
im just reading through a textbook, but shouldn't this be equal to 80? because it didn't take the absolute value of -13
Can i express the range as an inequality?
you can't because the domain is not continuous
so the range of the function would just be individual y-values in a set
Ah so if it was continuous it wouldn't have a restriction?
yeah now you would be able to use an inequality
yeah so like there's a difference between range and codomain
at high school level there's no need to introduce the idea of a codomain, cause the domain is implicitly assumed to be R
unless there's info that says otherwise in the question
no worries!
i wish they had ''codomain'' at the high school level
😔
@willow skiff Can u explain codomain a tiny bit and its use? I don’t get it exactly
There's no absolute value they just used square brackets to distinguish from the other brackets
pfft lmao, completely overlooked that i will make sure i use my glasses next time thanks
properly speaking, a function contains three parts: the domain, the codomain, and a relation between the domain and the codomain
in high school or below you omit the first two
but if you've seen $f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ for example, you know that codomain = domain = R
south
we also could have $f: \mathbb Z \to \mathbb Z$
south
in other words, we define the set of the function's possible outputs in the function definition
that set is the codomain
Yeah. Is there anything like important about the codomain? I understand there are differences between the range and the codomain clearly but still
no
oh? so whats the point of specifying the codomain? why not just say f(x) is a function defined on the reals ...
what you said means that the domain is the reals
the codomain could be anything, as long as the range is a subset of the codomain
yep
when we are defining functions formally, we always have to specify the domain and codomain as part of the definition of the function
and it's much easier to say "this outputs real numbers" than try to figure out the range
it's useful to have the concept of a function being "onto" or not. Without codomains, every function is onto its image set (aka range), and the concept disappears
how does one express 3^2^4^5 as a single power?
do you mean ((3^2)^4)^5 or 3^(2^(4^5))?
if you came across it and it looked like this:
$$3^{2^{4^5}}$$
ManifoldCuriosity
then you work your way from the top down
a largish sort of number
writing it as a single power isn't very practical because 4^5 = 1024 and 2^1024 is kind of large. That's the number that's the single power you'd put on 3
2^1024 has 309 digits
try using summations
and stirling's approximation
i've seen this exact question before
so i know the answer is e^x
some persistent ahh mf
fr
how would i solve this? I originally squared both sides but i realized that ruled out the possibility for a negative solution
and i cant think of another way to solve problems like it without squaring both sides
some guy that was spamming a scammy-looking link over and over
yeah
i mean like
he'd get banned and then another would repost
💀
did it like 3 times lol
know the tangent half angle
is that another trig identity
yes bruh
mb my teacher only got us to the sin sq cos sq = 1 identity so far
Hey I've been having difficulty trying to deduce the solution to these answers
It's hard for me to find a specific video
Or I just didn't understand the video
Can someone please tell me how these answers are derived or show me video that can guide me
Can someone explain question 1 if possible
For trig identities, you typically only want to work on one side at a time
$\sin^2(x) + \cos^2(x) = 1$?
hockeydude85
thats like the most basic possible identity. hopefully u will still get there
$\frac{1-\cos x}{\sin x} = \tan \frac{x}{2}$
impract1cal
any1 know how to solve this only using pythag identities?
would greatly appreciate it 🙏 (please ping if u manage to solve it)
$\frac{2\tan x}{1-\tan^2 x} = \frac{2 \tan x}{2-\sec^2x}$
impract1cal
😭
quiz tmr and teacher was absent today for me
where does ''the 2 in (k+2) come from ;-;
When you sum k(k+1)/2 + (k+1)
The numerator turns into k(k+1)+2(k+1) if you factor (k+1)(k+2)
Is this correctish
No. That sigma symbol is drawn too poorly
<@&268886789983436800>
Guys i got a 65/100 on my vectors and law of sines/cosines quiz 
what topics does this question cover and also does anyone know where i can find more practice questions like these
its ok i also did bad on my recent test
luckily my teacher is super nice tho so i can do reassessments
i cant.my friend got a 27/100 tho LOL
what did u get
oop
77.5%
uhh idk abt me tho 😭 bc everyone else in the class did so much better
maybe ur tests are way harder
how much is a A in ur class
for us a A is 87 percent and he rounds up lol
so 77 is really fckiong good
he gives us the hardest shit
makes sense
no lucky
oof
what topic u doing rn?
vectors and matrices
i am starting partial fractgions
thast the test i got a 65 on
oh💀 i hope i do good
idk what that is yet
hard shit
oh no
anyways i gotta study tho but also if u can find any practice problems liek this id aprpeciate it
LMAO thats the hardest type of problem
do u know how to do it?
not really
my teacher always pulls out the problems we've never seen before to test our "application"
😔
when your teacher doesnt talk about it and puts it on the test its pretty fucking hard
fr
like im not that intellligent im jsut good at memorizing
so true
what topics is it on
trigonometric identities in precalc
that should give you a basic idea
i dont think i got to that unit yet 🙁 idk what im doing is just reviewing a ton of review problems online cuz it will help me get more experience
and i think urs might be more memorization? so maybe make a quizlet and then review that too
sory cant be of much help
ima be honest trig identities are a lot of intuition unless you wanna have like 15 steps
so a lot of practice
idk if you can do that in the time you have tho 😭
sorry was doing my laundry
omfg thats all it feels like
yea you kinda need to just feel whats right
and go with your gut
ig its just pattern recognition
if you dont somehow decide to go down the right path by luck or have like vision into the future, it feels like ur done lmao
usually most methods can lead you to the right answer
it's just that some are a bit more tedious
like sure you could convert everything to sin and cos but knowing some identities and tips&tricks help save time and effort
memorization is a small part compared to what feels mostly like logical thinking
this will work fine it's just more steps
i guess its like the most reliable method
thats how i did it lol
ye
how would you do it hub?
intuition 😭
ah
like honestly whenever i see a problem
so im cooked
my first thought is like
okay whats the least amount of brain power i can use to condense this all
so like if its easy enough just multiple fractions to get the same denominator and then use identities
i think what really fcks me is just mid test, ill get tunnel visioned
converting to sin and cos is my last resort
just convert it all to sin cos
it'll 100% lead you to the right answer
it's just annoying
can you give me a really annoying one to solve by just converting to sin and cos?
so i can practice?
cuz i feel like my issue with doing that route is then my algebra is a whole cluster fuck of random stuff
and i have no idea how to solve it all
when i do basic algebra i turn my brain off and write bigger
cause im pretty confident in my ability to do alg 1
so as long as i dont go blind i can just do it
alright one sec
brackets are just parenthesis
oh ok
but sometimes it's hard to tell when you have too many parenthesis
so brackets make it easier to see
wait idk if youre doing verifying trig identities
if you are heres another problem
@scarlet wyvern my teacher is a bitch so he will say verify if possible to throw us off
yo thats actual torture lmao
i know 😭
our teacher doesnt give us problems that cant be verified
lucky
i turned everything into sin and cos like you said 🥲
it's just hard to follow
idk what leads to what
i just see a big circled 1
you're just trying to prove they're equal
also when you verify you typically only change one side of the equation
oh
ah, my teacher doesnt really make us do any verify problems
its good practice
ig so
the most we’ll have to verify is if an answer is an actual answer (like in those weird ass algebra 2 units where some answers were fake)
i kept forgetting to do that
oh this ones a bitch 😭
yea ima be honest i got tunnel visioned
can you give me just the first step?
like just the first one?
cuz i have genuinely no idea how to solve it
turn 1 to cos^2/cos^2
for the first fraction
i did that
but at least i know im on the right track
my algebras shit, am i allowed to do this?
yea
u need to have an argument for sin not just sin
But yes of course multiplication works like that …
i have no clue where youre at
the thing circled
this question
yea i just have no clue what you did to get there
you did this step wrong
well technically before that step
from here to the next step
tip for fractions like these:
(a/b)/(c/d) is just (a/b) x (d/c)
you cant write that cause thats not correct
but if you omit that step then yea its right
ykim i was just visualizing keep change flip
if its just aid then put it as sidework not an arrow cause that indicates it's a step
the “2cos^2 - 1” is pissing me tf off cuz i cant factor it for shit 😭
can you give me a tip to go from here?
yea uh
you did too much
idk where you went wrong but something went wrong
😭
i need to goto sleep so ill just send my solution
ok
damn youre smart
