#precalculus
1 messages ยท Page 48 of 1
yYour an idiot ๐ค
precalc is everything under the sun
๐ตโ๐ซ
that time it treated e as a variable through and through
why it did it differently idk
,w D[Power[e,x],e]

Oh my fking god not again with this shit please ๐๐ป
As cloud said, if u look closely, e looks the same
Euler e looks a little slant
I think
But it's not so obvious
It's not math anymore
It's forensics now
Yeah, I know about the font change but no idea why in my case it interprets e as a variable and not Euler constant
I did it look
,w de^x/de
,w (d/de) (e^x)

I try to use Wolfram Language but to no avail
,w D[Power[e,x],e]
Must be a bug
,w D[a^x,a]
,w d/di i^x
,w D[i^x,i]
,w d/dฯ ฯ^x
,w dฯ^x/dฯ
Looks like it's true
And here pi doesn't even look different
i did NOT learn that in precalc
nu- what now?
Oh sh...
๐
๐
it doesn't have to be a right triangle
The fact this is considered intermediate math. I mean besides delta and optimization work, it's pretty normal if you know what you are doing.
yea ๐
Riemann hypothesis I solved it
vixra or it didn't happen
But your proof would be too big so u leave it for the reader of your msg to prove it?
too big for the margins of a discord message ๐
I will solve riemann hypothesis and for that whether it takes my whole life
I will prove riemann wrong
I will work hard in mathematics ๐ฟ
Gambate
A trigonometry of a non right angle triangle?
I wanna know how we can solve this
sine rule, cosine rule
ever heard of those before?
Yes
How do you solve math problems in the simplest way I always make it over complicated๐ญ?
there you go, that's what cloud was talking about
if tan is negative actually, that means that angle is obtuse (if it's in a triangle, so has to be less than 180 deg)
practice, also worked solutions for similar problems can help
there's no shame in a long solution as long as you give problems a good attempt and reflect back on what you can do to make it more efficient
It always happens with trigonometrical differentiations
oh like that's an odd one to overcomplicate
cause differentiation is just a set procedure
if you were overcomplicating say integration that would be much more understandable (and more challenging to improve upon)
you have an example or something?
Hi guys
I was wondering , why there is no voice channel here in this server ?
by the way , for people who love calculus , here u go :
show me the solution please
btw I don't know what do u mean by precalculus tbh , is is the primitive ?
Can u guys help me plot shaded sketch for qn2b and qn3
I have no idea what precalculus is either. Maybe it is something between algebra and calculus like trig function
Yeah pretty much
The exact curriculum really depends on the school you take precalc at
I am too lazy to write the rest
This is calc literally stop using this channel for ut
I just answered for the guy above.
don't respond to the guy who responded, respond to the guy who brought it up๐
i think you have to have a double integral
Wait what double integral? 
not like i just meant you have to find the antiderivative of sin(x)/cos^4(x) dx before you integrate it
am i tripping
hold on
i didnt know this channel existed
and i want to learn more pre calculus
i only know series and sequences ๐ฅฒ
u = x, dv = sin(x)/cos^4(x)
uv - int(vdu)
x int( sin(x)/cos^4(x) dx) - int( antiderivative of sin(x)/cos^4(x) dx)
Oh, yeah forgot about that. I am too lazy to u-sub sin(x)/cos(x)^4 
๐
Heyy can someone help with the first one? I can't visualize how it increases until (0,1) but it starts concaving down at (0,-2)?
someone explain what derivatives are. Isn't it the tangent point on a non-linear graph? When i put it in a graphing calculator, it comes up with a secant line intersecting 2 points.
did you graph the derivative function and the original function?
derivative functions give the slope of the line at each x point
so that wouldn't work
yeah, it graphed f'(x) = 2x + 6
f'(x) gives you the SLOPES of the line at each point
so like at x = 0, f(x) = 9 and f'(x) = 6
which means the function value at x=0 is 9, and the slope of the tangent line at that point is 6
it doesn't actually give you the graphical tangent line
it gives you the slope of the tangent lines at each point
if you wanted to graph the tangent line at a particular point, you'd have to use linearization
linear graphs have derivatives
non-linear graphs may or may not have derivatives
i dont think thats where the confusion is coming from but yeah thats true too
it's not, just adding to you
Ok thank you both
I am happy
Congratulations!
omedeto
Hello guys
Ello
I am hs student and we skipped limits and just went straight to derivatives and soon will deal with integrals. I understand derivatives and can solve basic limits, but not mastered it and cannot solve harder ones
Should i master solving limits or just move on and dont waste time?
Do you know directional limits?
Yes
Youโll prolly be fine then
First unit of my calc class is mostly focused on teaching limits
Like if you have free time Defo work on limits
But you donโt need to worry about it too much
But not always can solve it without pluggin in x value that is approximately equal to it
Can you give me an example of a problem that you donโt know how to solve?
It will take a second, i need to find it
No worries
This one
I tried cube difference first
Than l'hopitals
Both methods gave me the expression where x is present
What should i plug in instead of x?
1.999...?
Can it be solved without pluggin in something close to 2 from left side?
it diverges, because the degree of the numerator is larger than the denominator
3 > 2
You need to manipulate the function until itโs non-fractional
this is the same limit as $\lim_{u \to 0^-} \frac{(u + 2)^3 - 8}{(u + 2 - 2)^2}$, where $x = u + 2$
south
$\frac{x^3 - 8}{x^2 - 4x + 4}$
Closer
so you will have a u^3 / u^2 = u term in there
but then you will also have a (3 * 2^2 * u)/u^2 term in there, which diverges
if you work it out it's u + 6 + 12/u
(8 - 8 = 0 so it cancels out)
What is diverging?
English is not my first language, so might not know some terms
the opposite of converging
The creators of this problem simplified the fraction to (x^2 + 4x +4)/(x - 2) and said that x^2 + 4x + 4 approaches 12 and (x-2) approaches 0-, so 12/0- = -infinity
Photomath had the last step the same
@willow skiff What do you think of this solution?
oh that makes sense
yeah that approach was in the back of my mind, recognising that x^3 - 8 is a difference of two cubes and hence divisible by x - 2
But, can we just say that if x approaches 2 from the left side, then x - 2 = 0-? Is it allowed on exams?
It doesnt seem like analytical solution to me
yep
constant/0 is an undefined form
0/0 is different, like (x - 2)/(x - 2) if x approaches 2
here's a huge list
these are the ones that you need to simplify, such as by cancelling
constant/0 is one of them that you just know can't evaluate to any finite number
I wondered why 0/0 cannot be determined. Is my assumption correct, that the numerator is any number approaching 0 and so is the denominator, but this numbers are not equal, so the numerator can be even bigger then denominator and 0/0 might equal, for example +infinity?
yeah exactly, it's about how fast each term is approaching 0 (or not)
But somehow if they both approach for example 12, then the limit is 1
Right?
for example $\frac{x}{x}, \frac{x^2}{x} \cdots$
south
yes
0/0 cannot be determined itself, so you have to go back to the actual limit and reason out what the answer is like you did
In mathematics, the limit of a function is a fundamental concept in calculus and analysis concerning the behavior of that function near a particular input which may or may not be in the domain of the function.
Formal definitions, first devised in the early 19th century, are given below. Informally, a function f assigns an output f(x) to every in...
you should go and read this
But why?
if both limits exist, then you can apply the four operations normally
12/12 = 1, but 0/0 = inderminant
you'll find out in real analysis
Is it some university level math?
this is about sequences but same idea
Thanks
knowledge of the triangle inequality would definitely help
as well as modulus properties
the trick to make all these work for limits is if $f(x) \to L$ for instance, then set $a_1 = L + 1, a_2 = L + 1/2, \cdots, a_n = L + 1/n$
south
then you've converted a function to a sequence that converges to a limit point
if L + 1 doesn't exist in the range, then take L + 1/100, or L + 1/10000 or whatever, then do L + 1/20000, L + 1/30000
you get the idea
What all things are considered precalculus?
everything is precalculus
Like, everything?
Lol okay
necro ping, but i didnt learn anything about limits in my honors precalc class lol
the most we did was the difference quotient and we didnt even cover what it did
fr
in #precalculus you dont get precalc
you only get things that are beyond the scope of it
What age is precalculus?
Everything that is not precalc, except these things, the rest is precalc
The joy of x got kinda boring
RIP
I was ahead a year, so it was junior year of HS for me
Iโm taking calculus however I skipped precalc so Iโm catching up (mainly with trig). Do I need to learn how everything works, like why cos=adjacent/hypotenuse and stuff like that? I do want to learn the ideas behind these things but could I just get by knowing the different ideas
Do I need to learn how everything works, like why cos=adjacent/hypotenuse and stuff like that?
yes
i don't know exactly why cos = adjacent/hypotenuse and i'm doing fine... ๐
kinda thought its more or less defined that way ._.
๐ it is though? i mean id say the taylor series defintion is more correct
i mean you could 'define' it in multiple ways but one of them would be adjacent/hypotenuse imo
like no cuz adjacent/hypotenuse is only for like the a right triangle and hence the angle are also bound to be in (0,pi/2)
the unit circle
or the taylor series
but you can rotate anywhere on the unit circle
or the complex number definition is more correct
and you can construct a "triangle" no matter the angle
but thats essentially forcing it, and anyways just say its the unit circle definition at that point
yeah
which is practically just adjacent/hypotenuse
๐
like you can explain it a little more but theres no big WHY
lmfao i aint winning this xD
thats just the way its defined
๐
pretty much yea
I gotta read proofs? 
yes
yeah
you should do pre calc
trig is not only about unit circles
have you heard of hyperbolic trig functions?
yeah, but thats not regular trig like cosine ._.
wdym regular
do you mean basic?
ugh
so irregular is hyperbolic ๐
ugh
bro
when someone says trigonometry
you're going to think of unit circle trigonometry
not hyperbolic trigonometry ๐
my internet is wack
it can..
yes
not in advanced classes
but yes in lower classes
ok...
and trig branches off of unit circles anyways it starts to go more into calculus to use
in algebraic trig in most problems only the identites are used
so yeah
trig is very vast
thats why its very fun
i don't disagree ๐
haha yes ๐
hyperbolic trig is the same as unit trig but imaginary
imaginary?
the entirety of math is imaginary what are you talking about ๐
math is just perspective
mhm
cos(ix) = cosh(x)
sin(ix) = i sinh(x)
oh right
no
objective truth
ugh
what are they teaching yโall in school
a problem can be viewed in so many different ways
True, I look at you differently now...
๐
Itโs literally like Itachiโs infinite tsukuyomi
like no body cares how many guys you took on in different ways
damn get some dignity
No?
Doesnโt mean itโs โjustโ perspective
You missed important aspects of math
Trig is about the exponential function duhh
It's always been a mystery to me why our highschool trigonometry included exp and logs. I thought trigonometry was also used as a general term for such topics. Now i understand that there's an actual connection between exp/logs and trig functions
i mean i kinda assumed they were taught as non-algebraic functions so kinda grouped into one category of learning...
Oh yea that makes sense
bro
i wasnt talking to you so dont judge please if you are going to say things that can hurt
its a math server ๐
this was a joke ๐ ๐
dumb question my mind is blanking, (-infinity,-2) U (-2,2) U (2,infinity) as a domain means all real numbers excluding -2 and 2, right?
because the union means the numbers can appear in any of these sets...i think
yup
you can also write it as R \ {-2,2}
ืจื-ืืช
Well log() does prepare one for the future in math. Like in cases where you figure out a difficult exponent.
True
yes
nvm im dumb
how can i graph this by hand?
sub theta = -pi/2, -pi/3, -pi/6, 0, pi/6, pi/3, pi/2 and join the dots together
btw I made this graph using the half angle sub
create a table with three diff lines theta, x, y, the find all the values of special right angles between -pi/2 amd pi/2, (prob just use pi/3) and graph the x and y
the handwriting is unreal HOWWWWWWW
:(
bro if we could use this on tests it would've been so nice
i didnt even know it was someones handrwiting i thought it was typed
oh also why is it 0.360 deg
its 0, 360 deg because 0 degrees and 360 degrees mean the same thing on a unit circle but not necassarily on graphs
oh ok i thought it was a decimal 0.360 lol
yeah lol its probably a comma
how can i find the point M on the curve r^2=sin2theta with the maximum x-coordinate and determine its angle where is in the range 0โคฮธ <2ฯ?
x = r cos theta = sqrt(sin 2 theta) cos theta
differentiate and set to 0
also note that a shift $\theta \mapsto theta - \pi$ doesn't change the equation, so $r = -\sqrt{\sin 2 \theta}$ and $r = \sqrt{\sin 2 \theta}$ are the exact same curve
south
Could you Tex it?
tex what?
$x = r \cos \theta = \sqrt{\sin 2 \theta} \cos \theta$
south
Ooh
In polar coordinate, ฮธ is symmetric with respect to the origin in the first and third quadrants and ฮธ is not defined in the second and fourth quadrants?
yes, that's correct for this function if you graph it out
I can't know this until graphing it?
o wait you can figure it out
yeah for sqrt(sin 2theta) to exist, sin 2 theta >= 0
so that excludes $\theta \in (\pi/2, \pi) \cup (3 \pi/2, 2\pi)$
south
and then sin(theta) = -sin(theta + pi) so that explains the symmetry
umm am i tripping or did you miss a negative sign
how can i calculate the arc length of r=asin^3(theta/3)? from 0 to 3pi
from where to where?
the formula is
arclength = integral of (sqrt(1+ (dy/dx)^2)) dx
just apply this
um do you know theta = arctan(y/x) and r = (sqrt(x^2+y^2))
oh nvm you can just use the formula for polars
you can never firgure it out with this formula, first you need to convert Polar to Cartesian Coordinates, then it'll be much of hassle, or else you can try, i failed this way
yea just use the formula for polars
this one
is saying "stricly positive " the same as "bigger than 0" (not eq to 0)?
how to find the total length of the curve y=$\int^x_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{cost}dt$
miyo
this surely is precalc
i mean they asked the question i just helped-
its just funny
thats an unsolvable integral
how #precalculus is literally just a calc channel
xD i mean we have #calculus
but some people dont have uni channels
its just calculus but disguised as pre uni
soo they dont see it
sorry i just remembered i learned that in hs so i asked in this channel
hello guys
i have to solve this logarithmic equation
5^(log x) = 50 - x^(log 5)
how do i solve it without sketching a graph
Convert everything except the 50 into e^ln form
e^(ln 5 * log x) = 50 - e^(ln x * log 5)
Write the log in ln form too
Or ln in log form
Your pick
Yea
Notice how the variable terms are equal
here is just ln 5
And that should be ln 10
In the denominator
For the second one
so 50 - 5 in RHS, right?
No no
It should be
e* lnx * ln5/ln10
Since the base is 10
So yea
but ln x cancel each other
?
I mean, ln x * (ln 5 / ln x)
Thats not ln5/lnx though its ln5/ln10
They wrote it wrongly ๐ญ
Yeah
Yea check the original eqn
.
Nd i just realised i shoulda have them use log instead of ln
But its alright
So what is rhs, did i make a mistake?
Its this.
Yea
Yeah you are right
Hmm
e^(ln 5 * (ln x / ln 10)) = 50 - e^(ln x * (ln 5 / ln 10))
What should be done next?
Notice the e^something terms are equal
So bring them to one side
Then ln the shit out of it
yeah, so if i bring them to one side, it will be e^((ln 5 / ln 10) * ln x) = 25?
Yea
okay then, just use ln on both sides
Yea
Thank you
Photomath didnt manage to solve it
But how did you understand how to solve it so quickly?
I mean, converting bases and logs using lns
Thats like the general rule of the thumb, make sure the base is same for all the variable exponents and logs
And x^log(smthn) terms are ugly
So yea
Understandable
And, do you consider solving logarithmic and exponential inequalities an important part of precalculus?
I hate these types of inequalities, i more into equations
um im not from the US so i dont really know what is considered important there
Neither am i
isnt precalc like a majorly US term-
But, the thing is, i dont know what is the crucial point in math when i should switch to calculus
anyways i didnt see any use for that until like as much of calc 2 ive covered ๐
tho just know the basics
you can switch if you know basic definitions of everything and can deal with trig and exponentials rather easily
inequalities arent really used as far as i know but they are prolly needed for higher courses so idk about that
Okay, thanks
I am just trying to learn math beyond the scope of my math course in school
And there is no something kind of math roadmap, so
I am currently trying to get better at solving log equations and move to calculus, but i am already quite familiar with it apart from integrals
๐ man been there i just kinda did whatever i felt like- so yea i have knowledge gaps but ehz for the important stuff it is almost always covered in something else you try to do so yea
So you just did whatever you like and didnt care much about possible gaps that didnt affect your overall math skills?
yea i wouldnt reccommend it tho ๐-
costheta = cos(-theta) because cos = x, and if theta is negative, x is still on the same position in the unit circle, which is why costheta = cos(-theta)?
and then similarly, sin(-theta) = -sintheta, because sin = y, -theta would mean a -y?
i'm not sure if i'm understanding correctly
cos = x?
yeah, the points on the unit circle are (x,y) = (costheta, sintheta)
๐ญ say that-
We learned that in algebra 2
and yes
Yes bc in the unit circle, sin(-theta) would be sin(theta) flipped over x axis
You can tell from this visual
i dipped from the end of the year last year when we were doing trig and now i'm playing catch up cause my calc teacher gave us limits with trig functions
so why isn't it -sin(-theta)?
i understand why -sin but if the angle is negative why isn't it put there?
man im so confused bruh
well now you have a double negative so it cancels out
what should i do first after doing caculus - differential equations or multivaribale calculus
Multivar
hii
both are fine, I actually enjoyed differential equations, cause of how applicable it is
multivar is also useful but moreso in a physics or engineering context
with multivar you'll be starting from unfamiliar territory and working your way deeper
with DEs it's not quite the case, cause somewhere you should have seen equations which are separable or linear first-order (y' + p(x) y = q(x))
multivar if you're choosing which do do first, diffeq if you're choosing which to do at all
cos theta = log theta base sin theta
Btw in the US, does Calc Honors have sequences, polar coordinates, conic sections, and vectors?
Idk what to try studying beforehand (yeah I know I can check khan)
Any 1 know how to do this
literally just state between which x values f(x) is decreasing
negative slope
its confusing to me like writing it in this format
You've an fucking onlyfans brother?
yes i make bread
loaf
Support: https://www.patreon.com/ProfessorLeonard
Cool Mathy Merch: https://professor-leonard.myshopify.com
How to determine intervals of Increasing and Decreasing from a graph.
this video explains it p well
'when is the graph of x going down'
that's literally the question
i got the wrong answer to this
the answer is option b but i don't understand why 4 is excluded
Open circle -> not included
okay i got it. My whole confusion arose because i forgot that the brackets were only meant for the end points and didn't explain the inclusion or exclusion of the rest of the elements in that interval.

is it just me or does it look like 3.9 is not included instead of 4 ._.
Lol
I need help on this one because I don't understand it
what did you even say-
I need help on my homework because I can't really understaned it
what you sent makes no sense whatsoever- so yea that might be the reason you dont get it
I know icos and sin but I'm unfamiliar with the capital sigma
what do you mean?
the image you sent means nothing
then how do I make it something?
lol it's not a real profile, or otherwise mods would get onto you
I think an OF joke is in bad taste
cause there are people who could be 13 in here
you know all the Kris Tyson drama and now there's Jack Doherty's 'girlfriends' who are advertising OF to literal preteens and kids in their TikToks
not a good time to make this joke
Is that the complete question?
do u think iโm 20 or smth
๐ญ๐
a 6 year old can make an inappropriate joke and its still inappropriate ._.
Buddy 13 year old are not babies
it does not matter
if it is against server rules, it is against server rules
depends on the 13 year old... ๐
Is that floor(icos(20)+sin(20))?
aw hell na
id probably get like 1 or 2 wrong
and then itd level down ๐ฆ
also it takes 6900000 howers to complete
fr
makes you master the whole lineup when you only want to master one specific thing
lock in
is this doable in like 4 hours a day for 3 days if i know all the algebra :
- Solving and Graphing Equations and inequalities
A. Linear
B. Quadratic*
C. Exponential
D. Logarithmic - Operations with Expressions and Factoring
A. Polynomials
B. Rational Expressions
C. Long/Synthetic Division and Rational Root Theorem - Operations with Radicals and Laws of Exponents
A. Rationalizing Denominators
B. Operations with Complex Numbers - Functions, their Properties, and their Graphs
A. 12 Basic Functions
B. Operations with Functions
C. Compositions and Inverses
D. Transformations
E. Rational Functions
F. Even versus Odd Functions
G. Asymptotes - Solving Systems of Equations
- Trigonometry
A. 6 Trigonometric Functions and their Graphs
B. Unit Circle, including Coterminal Angles
C. Degrees versus Radians
D. Pythagorean Identities and Simplifying Trigonometric Expressions
E. Law of Sines and Law of Cosines
No
Depends how in depth you go
what do you mean by 'know all the algebra?'
the fuck i didnโt break any server rules ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
I did not say whether or not you did
okay so why ru bringin it up
I simply said that the argument that 13 year olds are not babies is not a particularly strong one
and should not be used to justify what is allowed on the server
okay so what does something being allowed in the server have to do with me saying 13yr olds arenโt babies
๐ญ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
I agree with south when he says this though
I think an OF joke is in bad taste cause there are people who could be 13 in here
i didnโt make any onlyfans jokes in the server
whatโs being in my profile โ me saying smth
because this message is, to me, implying that it's okay to make these kinds of jokes because of your age
#precalculus message
I agree, and I am not saying that you did
I do still sort of think that it's not a particularly funny joke to include in your profile, but I will not tell you what to do
Most of it probably, but trig nah
pretty much
I did it in like 2 weeks for 30 minutes a day
guys is it possible to learn all of the listed topics in the picture before 2024 ends?
yeah
You got this bro
that seems a lot as i have adhd i can get carried away by other things easily :((
I'm still on domains and ranges which had been taught in senior secondary (high school)
yes you can.... ๐
most certainly
you can do it even quicker than that, in fact
Thatโs like where it starts to get kinda interesting so probably yes
W study plan. Although I'm not sure, you would have to be doing only a few questions each subject if you were going for 4 hours. I think this is doable, just make sure you spend more time on topics you arent as familiar with and less time on the topics you are more familiar with.
yeah man, just hunker down and learn it. W you for taking the initiative to learn this
does anyone know what the "this example is for" is referring to here
shouldnt the x is greater than or equal to be y ๐ญ
Same
that's confusing
$x > 0$ and $x \le 0$ just means $x$ is all real numbers
south
How do I memorize the unit circle? Any tricks tips?
Wdym by memorise the unit circle
Help
Are these just other ways of defining trig functions or are they a completely different thing?
um depends if they are in ur syllabus
They aren't
i mean if ur rlly keen on learning them why not ig but if its like not needed right now then u shouldnt have to worry about it ur better off focusing ur learning on stuff thats actually relevant rn yk
Iโve noticed a lot of word problems in general are geometrical if they go beyond simple algebra.
Its not aljebra@lapis sphinx
this seems calculus by looking at it
its ordinary differential equations
odes
the odes part of odes and pdes
If ( f ) is a function that satisfies ( x^2 \cdot f'(x) = 8 \cdot f(x) ) and ( f(2) = 1 ), then its Taylor polynomial of order 2 at ( x = 2 ) is ( P(x) = )
\begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*)]
\item ( 1 + 2(x - 2) + (x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 2(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 4(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 4(x - 2) + 4(x - 2)^2 )
\end{enumerate}
เถเถเถ
help please
If ( f ) is a function that satisfies ( x^2 \cdot f'(x) = 8 \cdot f(x) ) and ( f(2) = 1 ), then its Taylor polynomial of order 2 at ( x = 2 ) is ( P(x) = )
\begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*)]
\item ( 1 + 2(x - 2) + (x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 2(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 4(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 4(x - 2) + 4(x - 2)^2 )
\end{enumerate}
Aaditya
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
If ( f ) is a function that satisfies ( x^2 \cdot f'(x) = 8 \cdot f(x) ) and ( f(2) = 1 ), then its Taylor polynomial of order 2 at ( x = 2 ) is ( P(x) = )
\begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*)]
\item ( 1 + 2(x - 2) + (x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 2(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 4(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 )
\item ( 1 + 4(x - 2) + 4(x - 2)^2 )
\end{enumerate}
เถเถเถ
help please
Is this okay notation? Domain: $\mathbb{R} \backslash { 0 }$. Can anyone else confirm that this means ||all real numbers except 0||?
Primordial
What kind of formula could I apply for this question?
- Let $f: \left[ 13, \frac{125}{2} \right] \to \mathbb{R}$ be defined by $f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{2x - 25}}{x}$. Determine the absolute extrema of $f$ and indicate at which points of the interval $\left[ 13, \frac{125}{2} \right]$ they are reached.
เถเถเถ
help please
khan academy
okay
youll have to create an account
can u send a link
so Is easier
click courses
okay
and then go to your desired one
bruh
go to khan academt .org
there will be a button called courses at the top
you might need to sign up or smth
there will be a button called courses
just click that
get in
will be a list of courses
when you click the courses button
just choose the one tou want
is the answer to this around 18.248?
why wouldn't they allow you to use law of cosines
just use it to check
anyways
you can use arctan I think
not arctan
uh
I forgot
its the same as polar coordinates
or rotating vectors
,calc sqrt((9 sin(pi/3))^2 + (9 cos(pi/3) + 12)^2)
Result:
18.248287590895
yes
oh wait
just find the unit vector
cos(120), sin(120)
then match the magnitude
then distance
yes
Itโs some physics math test to check our math skills for this year
true in physics they want your ability to resolve vectors horizontally and vertically
hello fellow pre-calc
users
whatever
uhh, perchance does anyone know where I can get practice problems for circles, parabolas, and ellipses?
word problems
Level?
Uh isnt high school 4 years
oh dam i didn't know google has these practice problems
No not like google itself but therell be some site
People, i need help, i am doing this exercise from Khan Academy, Probability using combinations
the task is, find the probability of flipping exactly 3 heads from 8 coin flips
talking about combinations i think i understand them in case with unique items, lets say we have 8 people (ABCDEFGH) and we have to choose only 3, so how many unique groups of 3 people can we choose having 8 people
8! = 40320, which is number of all possible arrangements of 8 people . since we dont need a group of 8, we need a group of 3, we divide 8! by 5!, so we cut 5x4x3x2x1
now we have 336, which is a number of all possible arrangements of 8 people in a group of 3, e.g. ABC, BCA, CAB, DHG etc. Since order is not important and 3 distinct items can create 3! = 6 possible arrangements, we divide 336 by 3! and get 56 distinct groups of 3 different people. ABC, ABD...etc CBA e.g. is not included, cause we collapsed all arrangements of 3 with same items. This is more or less clear
With coins .... is not the same, but in terms of formula it is same its 8!/3!x5! then divided by 256
if we have a coin and flip it 8 times we have 2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2 = 256 possible outcomes, TTTH HHTT, or HHHT THTH etc, 256 unique outcomes
in formula 8!/3!x5!, 8! is all arrangements of positions of flips, if we name positions as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and this part is confusing to me,
8!/5! is 8x7x6 which is 336, which is all possible arrangements of any 3 flips, from possible 8,,,?
then we divide by 3! and get 56, which is amount of 3 heads...how?
,calc (4/5)^-1
Result:
1.25
Explanation?
$(\frac{4}{5})^{-1} = \frac{5}{4}$
Closer
Perfect
So it changes the position
,calc 64^(1/3)
Result:
4
,calc (25/16)^(-(3/2))
Result:
0.512
,calc sqrt(27)
Result:
5.1961524227066
,calc 3*sqrt(27)
Result:
15.58845726812
just asking on behalf of someone else, are you able to post an image in this channel?
Hello
How do i know whether i am ready to move to Calculus? I have already have a good grasp of what limits are, i can find functions extrema, solve basic optimization problems, but i dont know whether i have covered all essential precalculus topics. So are there any kind of precalculus roadmaps or something so that i can know what i missed and should master
read through this and see how many of these misconceptions/errors you are making
also there are a list of common calculus errors which should be useful
thanks a lot, but are there a list of topics that are usually covered in precalculus course?
i mean, these are common mistakes
no, it varies too much to say
like maybe you can go back and study matrices, the four operations and solving 2x2 equations using matrices
or you could study conic sections, focus and directrix of an ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola and their equations
but I hardly think that would be necessary for calculus
those are just bonus topics that don't really fit anywhere and that's why they're taught at this level
Higher Ed instructors: Sign in to access your products and courses, or access full eBooks and resources.
for example there is a list of topics here
but who can say that list or any other list is authoritative
thank you
no worries!
By the way, if i can solve exponential equations / inequalities, logarithmic equations/inequalities, trig euations, can i move to calculus? Are these the harderst topics in precalculus?
there is harder but I'd say you have all the fundamentals, you're ready for calculus bud
just make sure you didn't rush over those topics and that you studied them well
taking in a lot of different examples and learning from those problem-solving techniques, so that yourself can do them well
quality > quantity
no idea
they figured it out dw
no need to explain, i think i got it...)
hello im looking for help on pre calc ]
i am very confused
would these be my inflection pointsw
Trying to work out a similar problem but mine is in meters. Can I ask why my professor put -1/2 in front of (32)t^2?
Like would I need to do -1/2(9.8)t^2 for my problem in meters?
As for the why is there a -1/2 in front of (32)t^2, you will surely know the equation of motion is s = ut + 1/2(a)(t^2), thus the 1/2 and there is a minus because the velocity is in upward direction and and the acceleration due to gravity and displacement are in downwards direction. Also because the problem in the picture gives us the quantities in feet, we use g = 32 ft/s^2, but in meters it converts to g = 9.8 m/s^2 or for simplification g = 10 m/s^2
Middle is correct. Do you know what inflection points are?
wild
2nd derivative = 0
means d/dx (f'(x)) = 0, 2nd derivative is the derivative of the first derivative
so that's when the derivative = gradient of the graph isn't changing
or when a tangent line fits the graph really well, cause the gradient of a straight line doesn't change
2nd derivative zero <== point of inflection
but not necessarily the other way round
We need a pinned reference for conics equations
Really? How isn't it an if and only if
Oh wait
If the 2nd derivative is zero it can be a minimum, maximum or a point of inflection
Try x^4 for example
at x=0
Right yeah you could have x^2 at x = 0
yeah
Yeah the test is inconclusive got it
u need to do higher derivative tests
or just check points on either side
If the third derivative was non zero then it would be a point of inflection
If the third derivative was zero as well as the second
Then itโs a min or max
An intuitive explanation for this is like
A point of inflection is where the second derivative changes sign
If the third derivative is zero at this point then the second derivative is not changing
itโs a stationary point in the second derivative
So it cannot change sign at this point
can someone explain how to slove this
$2 = \sqrt{m - 4} \implies 4 = m - 4$
south
square both sides
thankyou
npnp
you know what would happen if we had $-2 = \sqrt{m - 4}$ instead?
we would still get $4 = m - 4$ actually
south
so after squaring both sides and solving
ALWAYS sub your value back into the original equation
to check it
cause -2 is not sqrt(8 - 4)
but 2 is sqrt(8 - 4)
unique candidate that fails
can you please explain your answer?
Do you know about: $a^{-1} = \frac{1}{a}$
Closer
how do i go about learning calclulus?
watch lectures, read a book, do exercises, repeat
find a copy of Stewart's Calculus if you have no idea
I mean Khan Academy is decent for calc I
What are minimum points? it's just popped up in a question and I haven't learned about it yet
points where the function is at a minimum
pretty self-explanatory
for example, you can find the minimum point of the quadratic y = ax^2 + bx + c without calculus, if a > 0 ofc
sub in x = -b/(2a)
but for other types of functions you need calculus
Oh damm, I thought it would be something crazy lol
lol
So it's just (kinda) error bounds?
how is that related to error bounds?
Idk my brain just drew a line
(Good point)
So like how would I do this (i)
is that A level maths
,rotate
you should learn the sum rule, constant multiple rule, and power rule for calculus first
then come back to this question
Level 2, so GCSE further maths
ah that makes more sense
This is also calculus
for minimum point or minima dy/dx = 0, and second derivative is positive at the point where the first derivative is 0.
dy/dx gives you the slope of the tangent at a certain point(the point provided), hence the tangent and the normal form a 90 degree angle the products of their slopes will be equal to -1[(m1)(m2) = -1], from here you find the slope of the normal line, to form the actual normal line, just put the given point in the original equation for an (x,y) satisfying the given equation. You now have the slope and a point satisfying the normal line, use the slope point form, which is --> (y-y1) = m(x-x1), to find the equation of the normal line.
Hope this helps
Might be a silly question, how can we determine the monotonicity of cos(sinx) ?
on which interval?
just tell on any one there is period of pi
no pi
Yeah, isn't it clear
the period is pi
it repeats after pi
[0, pi/2] or [pi/2, pi] these are the intervals are in which function is increasing or decrasing(strictly)
yeah exactly
periodicity is something completely different
I know that, i just meant that is the period of function is of pi, then we can split it based of points for which first derivative is 0
you can prove that in general, if g(x) is decreasing and f(x) is increasing, g(f(x)) must also be decreasing
Oh, I have definitely read that somewhere
$x_1 < x_2 \implies f(x_1) < f(x_2)$
$g(f(x_1)) > g(f(x_2))$, sub $ f(x_1) < f(x_2)$ in
south
must have slipped my mind
cause the definition of a decreasing function is if a < b, then g(a) > g(b)
cool nw
can someone explain the formula for sigma notation? also idk if itโs considered pre calc or algebraโฆ?
sigma notation is just a way of denoting a sum. for a simple example:
,, \sum_{\underbrace{n = 1}_{\text{start}}}^{\overbrace{3}^{\text{end}}} n^2 + 2n + 3 = (1^2 + 2\cdot1 + 3) +(2^2 + 2\cdot2 + 3) + (3^2 + 2\cdot3 + 3)
cloud
so we are starting with the variable n being 1, then adding up the formula for every value of n until we hit the ending value of 3
can you tell me what application(or whatever) is this
Desmos
Is the derivative of a non-odd, non-even function also a non-odd, non-even function, or is it an odd/even function?
or it can vary, any cases is possible?
Can someone explain how you get x>1 from 2x-2รทx^2>0
$2x - \frac{2}{x^2} > 0 \iff x > \frac{1}{x^2} \iff x^3 > 1$
Transparent Elemental
Ok, ty
y is there none in pre-university
this is pre university calculus
here?
yeppp
ohh kk
for qs like this whats the difference between
minimum and maximum
ohh is it like
whats the standard equation of circle of this general equation
if it x^3 then theres 3 stationary points
complete the square
minimum meanโs cannot be lesser than the given, maximum means cannot exceed or more than the give
watr
whats my teacher doing here
looks like theyโre creating a sign graph for fโ(x) to ascertain the nature of stationary points
is there a different way to do it
or is that the only way
i would say itโs one of the easier ones
i dont like it ๐ข
feel free to find your own preferred way
whats the next eaisest way
find the 2nd derivative
sub in x = -2/3 and x = 2/3
thats easier
note that if f''(x) = 0 the test is inconclusive
(consider f(x) = x^2, x^3, -x^2)
cool
$n! = \prod_{i=1}^{n}i$ for $n > 0$
Is this correct?
KingDanger
<@&286206848099549185>
better say n>1
Yeah because 0! Is also 1
And a sum from 1 to 1 is just not nice looking
$n! = \prod_{i=1}^{n}i$ for $n > 1$
KingDanger
it is not a concrete definition I say
due to this fact
Can this be definition for factorials?
It works for all positive integers though
Then what is the concrete definition?
actually idkโ ๏ธ
$n! = 1 * 2 * 3 * ... * (n-2) * (n-1) * n$ or $\prod_{i=1}^{n}$ for $n > 1$
TLauncherGD
some people say Pi function, but IDK if it is the right place to state it
for n >= 0
The first one is unnecessarily expanded
@tall folio ?
yeah
It's correct
can't have 0
In mathematics, an empty product, or nullary product or vacuous product, is the result of multiplying no factors. It is by convention equal to the multiplicative identity (assuming there is an identity for the multiplication operation in question), just as the empty sumโthe result of adding no numbersโis by convention zero, or the additive ident...
But 0! =1
what?
I saw what you deleted
yeah this statement is false
It is, in fact, true
Let me ask you a simple question
ok
What is $\prod_{i=1}^{0}i$
Catgod
it is dumb notation nothing else
Substitute 0 in (n+1)! = (n+1)(n!)
It's still valid
thus the product notation for factorial works with 0
here, they stated that P_0 =1, separately
you can't include it in the product
A product that has no term has the value of 1
a product over an empty set, rigorously
okay I'm not smart enough but lemme ask someone else
Then don't incorrectly correct someone
wait a min
$\sum_{i=1}^{0}i$ is 0 by the way
Catgod

@hasty lily you're super fast! ๐๐
Yeah
Is this correct explanation?
It's hand wavy but it sorts of work
depends on how your book defines factorial