#precalculus
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
yea
the exact answer is 100pi
oh ok
np
what grade are you in
for A i got 1054
then it is 1054.956
i think
not sure
oh
10400.168
try this
1053.757
1053.757 should work
yea
Anyone up?
ya
Ye
can someone help with this
do not give out answers.
aight
do you need help with a specific part of the question or did you just not understand it
the question
well, you choose one of the alternatives. supposedly only one of them is correct
it's both a reading comprehension/graph interpretation question
read on the definition of an "increasing", "decreasing" and "constant" function.
ok
with the exception of linear functions, any function can have parts where it increases, decreases or stays constant
(linear functions are either increasing, decreasing or constant).
b
lmao
how can i solve -27x^4 + 18x^3 -48x^2 +15x -18 = 0 for its complex solutions
is there a nice substitution i’m missing or
i figured as much but i don’t even know where to start
maybe just suppose two quadratics Ax^2 + Bx + C and Dx^2 + Ex + F and multiply them out and equate coefficients to set up a system
obv this would be the long way bc it’s not at all obvious how i could come up with a product of two quadratics, at least to me
for anyone wondering, brute force gave me (9x^2 -3x + 9)(-3x^2 + x -2)
lol u just look at the graph
seems about right, but there is an easier solution probably
first factor out the 3
of course, i took out a -3 to make the leading coefficients positive
-27x^4 + 18x^3 - 48x^2 + 15x - 18
-3 ( 9x^4 - 6x^3 + 16x^2 - 5x + 6)
9 = 1 x 9 or 3 x 3
Try
-3 (3x^2 + ax + b) (3x^2 + cx + d)
coefficient of x^3 = -6 -> 3a + 3c = -6
coefficient of x^2 = 16 -> 3b + 3d + ac = 16
coefficient of x = -5 -> ad + bc = -5
constant = 6 -> bd = 6
I am too lazy to solve these, but this is how you would do it by inspection in general. I don't think there's another way to do it.
that’s essentially what i did but i didn’t factor out a 3 and made it more difficult for myself
i then made guesses on B and D and subbed them back into everything and checked if i could find a solution
heres some cool precalc notes i took #5
What do you use for writing?
Nice thank you, but this is .5 mm?
yes
AGREED
wait for Real Analysis. lol
😂
hey can someone help me with this problem? I derived that cosx = 1/2 but I think I have to find a sin im not completely sure since I got half credit on the test
if done correctly you should get two solutions for cos
and use your unit circle to find sin value that give you the two angles
if it was cos (something) = [ ( 2 pi ) / 3 ] which is also 120 degrees
the sin value would just be [ ( root 3 ) / 2 ]
can you write it out? im ahving trouble following @grave yarrow
is showing the steps okay
sin (t) - sin (s) = 2 cos [ ( t + s) / 2 ] sin [ ( t - s ) / 2 ]
2 cos [ (2x) / 2 ] sin { [ ( 2 pi ) / 6 ] / 2 } = 1/2
2 cos (x) sin ( pi / 6 ) = 1/2
Trig Value : sin (pi / 6) = 1/2
2 cos (x) * 1/2 = 1/2
2 cancels : cos (x) = 1/2
Trig Value : cos (pi / 3) = 1/2 & cos [ (5 pi) / 3] = 1/2
if you're finding sin
use unit circle
how do you find the vertical asymtopes for tan functions?
Dividing by zero I guess
Tan x = sin x / cos x
so if i have y=cot(x/2) what would be the va?
wdym? do I find where sinx = 1/2?
um yes
bruh can some explain me limits and continuity and help me to my sums
iam dying out here
luv it!
quite curious why the tangent o f the functions aren't included in the diagram?
So I'm stuck on promblem one of this review guide I don't understand why cos would be negative
If we are using quadrant 4 of the unit circle .
I got this question answered by someone else they said I was right and it was supposed to be cos= positive 4/5
So the teacher probally messed up on the review guide.
what an advanced unit circle. should be my new pfp
holy what type of math is this 💀
Trig
How would you write f(x)=-4×2^(1-x) in f(x)=ab^x?
Basic trig
i see
exponent laws
such as: 2^(1-x) = 2^1 * 2^(-x)
and 2^(-x) = 1/2^x...
got the last one, confused on this
graph is inclusive with it
btw would the shift for the graph be shift to the left by pi/6 and factor by 2? or do i need to add on
<@&286206848099549185> boop
nvm again
When i calculate difference quotient online for ${x}^2+3x+5$, I get $h+2x+3$ along with a graph plot? How is the graph plotted ?
VECTORFIELDS
h = 0
∫(f + g) dx = ∫f dx + ∫g dx.
What have you tried?
So if I, for example, do ∫(3x^2 + 2x + 4)dx, I'm very confused about how this translates to being the area under a graph. Can someone explain?
Can someone teach me how to make this all possible values of tan(x)
<@&286206848099549185>
how do you put C and P into a calculator
the green letters just turned all my equations into 0
All it means is creating infinite number of rectangles under the curve to find the exact area
you want answer in radians or degree? and whats the range?
I already got it but thanks
The questions was vague asf it didn’t give a range
lol
np
Hey there, can anyone help me out?
same^
Evaluate both and then add
🫡
heres some cool precalc notes i took #6
sexy ass notes
i can never take good notes during lectures
if i put more effort into making them look good i cant properly understand what theyre trying to convey
luckily my teacher posts the lesson notes after school so i can always check if i miss something
but most of the time the notes i write are while the lesson is happening
holy grail for correction tape btw
not to be weird or anything but are you are a girl because I doubt a guy could write notes that neat either way well done
is there any way to use the pattern that goes on with the entries to make taking the determinant computationally easier or do you still need to just brute force multiply everything out?
how do you find sin of an angle not on the unit circle? for example; sin(35)
$\sin(35) = \frac{\sin(35 \pi/180)}{\cos(35 \pi/180)}$
can u send image of that in non-text?
Alois
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
thx
np
i'm a guy
sin(ᵖⁱ⁄₄)cos(ᵖⁱ⁄₁₂) - cos(ᵖⁱ⁄₄)sin(ᵖⁱ⁄₁₂) ?
this is incorrect
Heya, so does anyone know how the answer for part c was found? I've spent like, an hour just trying to figure it out.
Nah
well, either i misunderstood you or you said that sin(35°) = sin(35°)/cos(35°)
wut?
Is this an acceptable answer for proving trig identities? If not, what should the answer look like? I don't need steps, I want to know what the solution SHOULD look like
the solution could look like anything
the point of the problem is to show that the equality holds, which it clearly does
Thank you
matir
How do I factor a cubic polynomial with a leading coefficient greater than 1, in less than 2 minutes? Assume grouping doesn't work.
cubic formula 😈
or just rrt
Hello, how would you approach this one. Not sure I fully understand the problem
kirchoff's circuit law
at any node, the total amount entering equals the total amount departing
Help
I need a real life example of the golden ratio
But it has to be something really unexpected since my class and other class can't have the same output
what the fuck
that's a really specific application
"application" as if anyone is ever going to use that
I'm pretty sure that Iphones use the golden ratio
Or is the Samsung tv
I don't know for sure
Maybe try something to do with the golden triangle. With side lengths 1 and the golden ratio, it has the angles 36° & 72°. Hope this helps
Does the manufacturing of Vietnamese flags count as a practical application?
(Many other national flags contain stars with the same golden proportions -- e.g. the ones of Ghana, North Korea, Cuba, and USA -- but the star on the Vietnamese one is particularly large relative to the flag itself, so it is easier to notice the proportions there).
I wouldn't see why not
does anyone know how to do #21
A good way to think of it is to find what values of tan (x) could equal √ 3. If that didn't help, then think of values for when sin(x)= √3/2 or when cos(x)=1/2 because tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x) and (√3/2)/(1/2) = √3
I gotcha
How did you get the answer attempts in the screenshot?
So first off, we can figure that line A being perpendicular to the ground means that the angle within the triangle must be 180 - angle a in this example
With x now known, we can find the value of what I'll call angle C through 180-A-B
Through this, we can use the law of sine to determine the value of line A with angle C, distance between A and B, and angle B like so
To answer the second question
(Those numbers 181 and 178 are completely off, but they're roughly in the ballpark of what you'd get if you ignore "NOTE: The picture is NOT drawn to scale", and just measure on the diagram.)
We use our answer to the first question, the distance of line A, to answer the distance between the satellite in the ground at your see in this example
We will draw a 90° from the satellite to the ground, erecting a 90° angle
With this right triangle, we will use the value of A to determine the value of x (seen as the distance between the satellite and the ground), and our good ol trig function cosine seen in this example
Then you'll have both of your answers
I hope this helped you
Crap, the value below x should be A sorry
It's always good to leave a gotcha for the asker to find, so they get a chance to exercise their own understanding ;-)
Sounds good, I don't usually teach on chat, so I appreciate the pointer
Tongue somewhat in cheek. But if you want advice, mine would be to try to engage more with the asker, probing what their understanding of the problem is and which parts of it can be salvaged instead of just dumping a clean-sheet roadmap to a solution on them. I appreciate that you're leaving out the actual numbers so you're not actually doing their homework for them. But it's a part of such exercises to give some experience with searching for a workable solution strategy, and just having a route that works handed to them reduces the learning value of that.
Fair enough
I usually do most of if not all of what you've said when I teach in person of course, I'm just totally new to discord teaching if you may. I guess I just thought it would be different. Tbh, with heinsight, it did seem a bit hand holdy and rushed, but I should stick to what I usually do. Thanks for the pointers my guy, every little one counts 👍👍
That agrees with my calculator.
(And I did it in a different way than Bagel, viewing the 66 km as something times the difference of two (co)tangents).
(Also, insert expressions of tired outrage at the idea of demanding results with six significant digits, when the angle measurements only had three -- and the difference between those angles which, is what matters most, is only known to two significant digits).
(The right answer in both boxes would be "about 1400 km, give or take a hundred". But the autograder woudn't like that).
(Also of possible interest: a satellite at that altitude moves across the sky at a speed of at least 0.15° per second when it's near zenith, so one hopes the observers at those two tracking stations have accurate watches to synchronize their measurements by).
How would I find the answer to 5b?
seems hard
Hello guys I just wanted to find out how can I solve vector questions like these ?Im completely confused .
Yes sir i do know the formula
- operation we using right? I attempted this question 5 times and still got it wrong I dont know why
By adding ax ^2 and ay^2 and getting the sums square root right ?
thank you sir for the guidance ,take your time
no problem
vector v is what?
ExAllocatePool2
true
Thank you sir I will apply this to the question then come back to you should I have any difficulties !
I need help with this equation I don't understand any of it
Well your answers, right off the bat, fails to answer the question
Check the intervals
You're missing a couple of solutions
@tardy thicket
What I recommend is just isolating sin^2(x)
what you mean byyy isolating
Sin^2x
$$4\sin^2(x) - 2 = 0$$
$$\implies \sin^2(x) = \frac{1}{2}$$
$$\implies \sin(x) = \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$
You're missing the -1/2
Umbraleviathan
Im exempting from the precal midterm
im chilling this week
only midterms I have is economy, health science theory, photojournalism, and tennis
In the underline part
How did he get ln(1/25)
Curious
@opal tree
If your there or anyone
Logarithm rules
$a*ln(b) = ln(b^a)$
So $-2ln(5)$ becomes $ln(5^{-2})$
⛄ Is Toast Frosty? ⛄
$$-2\ln(5) = \ln(5^{-2})$$
Umbraleviathan
Yep lol
someone explain how
Let the length be 'l'
Then w= l-3
The use the formula for area of rectangle ie lxb
Ok lol
l^2-3l-335>=0
$l^2-3l-335>=0$
True
can anyone explain to me how to graph logarithmic
you got anyway to show us
in a different photo
change it into exponential form
then plug numbers into x and solve for y to get points
Can someone help me with this, its an optimization problem
draw the picture of what the problem is describing
Guys
I need 3 vertical stretching examples with solutions
To pass for my project in the morning
I also have like 8 more different 3 examples needed
But I need vertical stretching
Since I have no idea what that is
Im struggling with finding the period and building a function for this graph
You mean like to find what is the period pf the red wave?
The period is 2pi/frequency
Essentially, I'm asking you what 2pi divided by what will get you 60?
Don't ping random users for help.
Please, Will Someone Help Me?
Help
D?
Please help 😭
if F' is the derivative then it's at 0
So I have been trying to solve this and based on my understanding the answers are all wrong. I solved it first on the basis that they want the 2nd derivative but that's not one of the answers. Then I tried to find the derivate and replace the t with (2). That also is not in the answers. Am I being stupid or are the answers wrong?
can i see ur work?
Aight just a sec
Actually nevermind. I got it now. It's 8
How? @viscid thistle
Does anyone know vectors here?
The angle between a and b is 60 and a I have to calculate that cross product
I don't know if what I did is correct or not
Can someone explain to me why |x| isn’t differentiable at 0? Aren’t the one sided limits the same, and isn’t it defined at 0 to? Therefore, the function is continuous, but not differentiable at 0 apparently? Can someone explain to my why it isn’t differentiable mathematically if in fact it is continuous? I understand graphically that there can not be a tangent line on a vertex, however mathematically I don’t understand.
The slope from the left is -1, slope from right is +1
A derivative is found by basically inching closer and closer together to a point, but at x = 0 on y = |x|, there is no gradual change in slope, it goes straight from the slope being -1 to +1
I’ve got a question myself now;
would y = (-2)^x be considered an exponential function?
I know the variable is the exponent, but it isn’t an actual function due to the base being negative, right?
The base must be greater than 0 for it to be a exponential function.
what does one value of x mean
the absolute value of x?
cause the negative answer is -3/2
but they only want 1
there are two solutions to that quadratic,
they just want you to submit one of them
that's what they mean by "one"
😭
did x = 0 work?
sup, do you still need help?
these are all specifically approaching -1 from the right
ok alright thanks
(2x + 3)^2 - 6x - 9 = 0
(2x + 3)^2 = 6x + 9
(2x + 3)(2x + 3 ) = 3(2x+ 3)
D.B.S by 2x + 3
2x + 3 = 3
2x = 0
x = 0
good ol' division by zero
i was wondering what do u call this maths for advance study
calculus
how to solve this?
calculus with limits
how's trigonometry?
I'm taking it second semester in high school and just got done with college algebra.
depends on the person
Precalculus, it seems
Understand your geometry and ratios and it's a cakewalk
Just subtract 2Pi until you can't anymore
Coterminal angles always have a difference of 2πn, where n is an integer
this has nothing to do with numbers being odd
the limit arctan(n) as n approaches positive infinity is pi/2
the inverse of an odd function is odd. But here it just asks what value of t satisfies the equality tan(t) = 1.
that's all an inverse function is:
\begin{align}
tan(t) = 1 \
tan^{-1}[ tan(t) ] = tan^{-1}( 1 ) \
tan^{-1}[ tan(t) ] = tan^{-1}( 1 ) \
t = tan^{-1}(1) \
\end{align}
oh
roland202
oh you weren't asking that i'm drunk
well, f(t) = tan(t) is an odd function. So for it to have an inverse, you restrict the domain to the vertical asymptotes to the right, and left of the origin
$(\text{cotan} 12^\circ+\text{cotan}33^\circ)\cdot{h}$
bruh
BuboBlakistoni
here
yes
then just sin cos stuff
but since anhles arent same the base isnt gonna j be 50-50
how
take the left triangle
and the right triangle
find the base of those
then add the two bases
how do i find the base tho 😅
do you know trig
wait wouldnt that turn into tan(12)=h/x
Kirra
thats cool lmao
wdym by x
the first base?
yes
then same for the second base
how do i differentiate #5 from first principles?
I got a final tmr right. Could someone show me how I would graph y=cscx
Did I do c. and d. Right?
in the blue did I do this step correctly
also here the question “simplify as much as possible. Use special products whenever possible”
Thanks 👍🏻
@tardy thicket in the numerator, if you square a sqrt, the sqrt cancels out and in the denominator you have two t√(1 + t) so you can simplify that too
Can someone help me understand how the author simplified the expression as shown?
Ah, ok
anyone pls tell me how do i get started with calculus
and what all should i know for it
i am in grade 9
pls respond
calculus follows directly after learning functions.
you need to be proficient in dealing with polynomial, trigonometric, rational, logarithmic, exponential, and absolute value functions.
this includes concepts like domain and range, asymptotes, max/min, roots, etc. you should be familiar with the fundamental theorem of algebra and the remainder theorem.
do this:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus
(skip matrices, vectors, conic sections, and complex numbers. you usually pick it up later)
The Precalculus course covers complex numbers; composite functions; trigonometric functions; vectors; matrices; conic sections; and probability and combinatorics. It also has two optional units on series and limits and continuity. Khan Academy's Precalculus course is built to deliver a comprehensive, illuminating, engaging, and Common Core align...
thanks
i don't know where to start with this problem
i would start with
x = a + 1/a, y = b + 1/b, z = c + 1/c
so f(x,y,z) = 0 and abc = 1
I need trig help.
Anyone know how to solve this? I created an equation that’s close, but something is just slightly off. I would appreciate any help
your min has to be at dec 21st and max at jun 21st, did you apply a phase shift?
(assuming northern hemisphere, otherwise its the other way around)
why is it pi/182 and not 2pi/365?
the 3.7 magnitude is find and the 12 vertical shift is also correct
(idk why you chose a -3.7 it just overcomplicates things)
"cos" is also okay it works just the same as "sin" so i wouldnt change that
Now you have $D(t)=3.7\cos\left(b\cdot t-\text{Phase Shift}\right)+12$
Fang
do you know how to solve for phase shift @frozen plume ?
yes
I know cos - cos sin -sin are all the same I was just trying to line it up with the graph
At t=1
"phase" instead of horizontal is usually how you refer to it with trig functions because it corresponds to an angular shift in the function
or at least thats how i think about it
I did pi/182 cuz it’s half of 364, Jan 1st is t=1 so 365-1 = 364 2pi/364=pi/182
Ok thanks
for the B coefficient of t in the function you should go by 2pi/period
dont go by the indexing of days that will just get confusing
well the period would be 1 year? Right?
yes 1 year is 365 days
why are you still estimating with desmos 😭
use 3.7cos(bt-C)+12
you already have b
This is the goofiest problem ever
I swear I’m not this dumb btw I got an 100 on my graphing trig functions test yesterday
How would I solve for phase shift
I was using 355 days as the minimum to make it a -cos function
And then using the distance from 355 to 365, so +10 as the phase shift
info you have:
values from 8.3 to 15.7 --> (15.7-8.3)/2=3.7 amplitude, (15.7+8.3)/2=12 vertical shift
period of 365 --> B=2pi/365
min at 355, max at 172
we are using positive cosine so a phase shift correlates to shifting the peak (max at 172) --> 172=C/B where D(t)=3.7cos(Bt-C)+12
172=C/(2pi/365) --> C=344pi/365
--> D(t)=3.7cos((2pi/365)*t-344pi/365)+12
when it all comes together
YO YOU GOT IT
you could have used -cos if you did the phase shift with respect to the minimum
WITHIN .5
or sin if you shifted it to halfway between the two solstices
(the 0.5 error comes in because of the day indexing)
Wdym indexing
like each day is numbered
Oh yeah
sorry i use indexing in cs a lot lol
not math
Thank you for the help I really appreciate it
make sure this process makes sense
it is much better and more time efficient than graphically guessing
I just gotta look at how you got the c value
Nah for sure
We were only supposed to graph certain priblems
I was using a graphing calc to check my graph
https://www.varsitytutors.com/precalculus-help/find-the-phase-shift-of-a-sine-or-cosine-function
this has a simple explanation for an example problem
Yo I’m actually so slow
We did the phase shift thing in class
J just realized there has to be two sets of parenthesis
sometimes you have to get stuck on a problem to realize how useful some things are
fully reasonable
Like I was putting everything into one equation but if I wrote it down with the period outside another parenthesis it would’ve worked
Okay s like if i know the function is increasing from -7 to -5 and then at -1 to 7, Would I write it as f(x) is increasing on the interval "[-7,-5]U[-1,7]" or "(-7,-5)U(-1,7)"
I'm leaning towards the second option but like grr it's a simple writing mistake that will cost me a bunch
is it defined on -7, -5, -1 and 7?
if the exercise specifies to determine strict inequality f'(x) < (>) 0 then you use strict brackets
otherwise it doesn't matter as long as your intervals contain no common point
Wait yeah I got it alr
This part here
Thankksss
in this case, i would assume that your professor/teacher is looking for "f(x) is increasing on the interval [-7,-5)U(-1,5)U(5,7]" because when f'(x)=0 (at those excluded points), then it is not increasing
where "[]" is inclusive and "()" is exclusive
i would argue that it does matter separately from the common point issue
can someone help me?

I basically missed a unit for composition of functions etc and we have a test today, I am willing to pay if someone can help me out@
Yeah alr I figured that out tyyy for confirming ❤️ ❤️ ❤️
we do not offer cheating on tests or exams
A function is not increasing at a single point -- that's a property the function can have over an interval. This can be satisfied even if the derivative is 0 at some points in the interval. The standard example is x³, which is increasing on all of R even though its derivative is 0 at x=0. And @grave valve's function is shaped essentially like the bend of x³ near x=5. It is increasing on all of [-1, 7].
That seems poorly defined to me… i would expect x^3 to be non-decreasing on all of R but not strictly increasing on all of R i would expect (-infty, 0)u(0,infty) as a union of open intervals… do you have somewhere i could read about that more? I understand a function is not increasing at a point but points can be excluded from intervals, no?
The defintion of "f is strictly increasing on D" is that f(a) < f(b) whenever a,b in D with a<b.
So if you want to claim that x³ is not strictly increasing on R, you need to be able to show a pair of a and b such that a < b, yet not a³ < b³. Can you do that?
Ah ok i see
That does make a lot of sense
How did they determine those were the zeroes and poles
They skipped a step where they factored the numerator and denominator
well factor they did
really just guessing one nice factor is enough to factor the cubic on the top - and the bottom has s as an obvious one and another lucky guess will get you your factorization
don't cross post
How can I find 19 and 23 algebraically without having to look at its graph?
This, doesn't make sense to me, I was simply tipping in numbers into my calculator and looking at the graph. Otherwise, I wouldn't just left the answer as 7 & 11
(pi/6)·12 = 2pi, so the period of the function is 12.
Adding 12 to each of 7 and 11 gives 19 and 23.
(The actual period of lunar tides is about 12h25m, not 12h, but the model in the exercise seems to ignore that).
Ooh okay, I get what you mean, know that I recall, I have done a similar problem like this, where I had to keep adding 2pi, to get all the solutions in a 0 to *#*pi interval. Thank you troposphere!
Uhh π-π/6= 5 π/6 right?
Why are we applying the LAPTU rule when there is no 1x^2 polynomial function in this question?
Friends, can you look at this question and help?
Bro this is #precalculus 
Oh whoops! I'll correct that negative to a positive sign, thank you!
Hey can we say the for every differentiable function f(x), f’(x) is continuous?
You can say it, but it wouldn't be true. :-)
The standard counterexample is $$ f(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{when }x=0 \ x^2\sin(1/x) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$
Troposphere
(and this is not in any reasonable sense PREcalculus ...)
Ohh okay..I was confused why this happens though cuz I thought if a function is differentiable then the f’(x) should be continuous…
Should I ask this in calculus Chanel?
That would be a better place for follow-up discussion, yes.
Kk
What have you tried?
do not give out answers
csc(B) is 1/sin(B)
sin(B) is b/c
Is precalc much harder than algebra 2?
May I know how to find the derivative of f(z) = Im z?
Not sure how to just get the imaginary part, but i know the form is x+iy
this function is not differentiable @sturdy grotto
Yea, I just found out using Cauchy Riemann
Anyway, thanks
I have to prove with the epsilon-delta-criteria that the function $f(x)=\frac{1}{x^2-x-2}$ is continuous in the interval (0,1). This is how far I got $\ f(x)-f(\hat{x})=\frac{1}{x^2-x-2}-\frac{1}{\hat{x}^2-\hat{x}-2}=\frac{\hat{x}^2-\hat{x}-x^2+x}{(x^2-x-2)(\hat{x}^2-\hat{x}-2)}$ But what do i do now?
Plazzi
1+1
= 3
The area of the region is equal to 6 square units correct
But in terms of integrals (that is how we define area for integrals), it can be negative
Area under the x-axis is negative, and area above the x-axis is positive.*
*In the context of integrals
This may also be better fit for #calculus
no what 1 + 1? bruh here is my work to prove it is 2
ohh ok
thanks
i understand why now
good
bro precal is easy
first you have to determine if 11pi/9 is within the domain of the inner function (tan). after that, you evaluate tan(11pi/9), then figure out if that value is within the range of tan^-1 (which is all real numbers)
heres some cool precalc notes i took #7
I'm looking at transposing formulas right now. I don't know how to start or where. I'm tempted to grab a ruler but I doubt that's what my teacher intended. 🤣
use the information it provides
By the looks of it W should = 2a, 1.5a or somewhere in between. But the question says nothing about estimating, so I don't want to go with that.
each window is h meters high and w meters wide
the question does not ask you to represent h or w in terms of a and b or vice versa
I'm still a little bit lost. I'll just write some stuff down and see where my train of thought goes. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction.
ok
wow very cool and organized. I see a little frog there too hehehe
and very good hand writting
heh yeah thank you so much
whattt
can anyone help me with a question, its on equations of tangents and normals
someone probably can, just ask 🙂
i dont know if this belongs in the pre calculus section
wait nevermind ignore that, i sent the wrong question
aaa
i*sqrt(6*4) and i*sqrt(4*6) are the same, what’s the issue?
sqrt(6*4) and sqrt(6)*sqrt(2) are not the same, to point out one problem
is it possible for someone to rate precalculus by blitzer textbook? is it gonna give a strong foundation on all the topics before calculus? i wanna know since its 1400 pages long and i don't wanna dedicate my time to something bad
I wouldn't trust a math book that features this many pictures
but there's only so few things to learn in the precalculus, you're not going to find a book that has vastly different content
Jesus christ where would you need so many trig identities
Pretty Neat Notes unlike mine.
Half angle formula other variations
Hell
Not wrong lol
Fuck "pre calculus"
I've gone up till calculus 3 and never needed this shit lol
bruh, pre-calc is so easy
17.89
"Pre calculus" isn't necessary if you already have a strong mathematical background before learning calculus
Learning all these things seems like overkill considering it's unlikely if we'll ever use them
Instead you should learn about complex numbers, vectors, and matrices
Something like that would be more useful
That sounds a lot like "it isn't necessary to learn such-and-such if you already know it".
Jagteshwar(JPS838898)
you know you can throw these into WA and check for yourself, right...?
but also this looks a little suspicious
also bad tex, somehow. what's with that eight
,w sin(4x) = |cos(x)| (4 sin(x) - 8 sin^3(x) )
Huh
I replaced cos with the sqroot
So instead of abs value it should just be cos a in graph
Then should work I think
Yeah seems to work
cos(x) ≠ sqrt(1-sin^2(x)) generally
Hmm I’ll def verify with Desmos next time
Is that because of the 4 quadrants and the functions type (even/odd)?
shouldnt it be sign(x) sqrt(1 - sin(x)^2)
Like how cos is always positive but sin is negative from pi to two pi
Wdym?
Doesn’t work
Eh
@torn sluice isn't sec inverse cos?
@torn sluice arcsec(x) = arccos(1/x)
Like the significance of $\int_a^b Cdx$?
Umbraleviathan
yes
so it's just b - a ?
No
_ _
The integral can be described as the area between a curve and the x axis
no i mean, what's the exact value then
of this expression
ok
@hazy hollow do you still need help with this?
So i want to confirm this but i think i have derived the formula to obtain sin (nx) purely in terms of the powers of sin x and i obtained this
Thats is according to desmos equal to sin nx
And then i tried same for cos nx
And got this
And same according to desmos this is true
But just want to know if others get same answer
As there isant any convinient way i could plug into wolfram
show your calculation
Yes
okay. was the a = 16.583 value written by you?
,calc sqrt(18^2 - 7^2)
Result:
16.583123951777
okay yeah checks out
do you know the SOH-CAH-TOA mnemonic?
and have you been introduced to inverse trigonometric functions?
Yes
When finding the derivative to this, why should I not use the Quotient rule and instead only take the derivative of them separetly?
Like this
this is not a derivative
this is calculating the limit of f(x) as x->1
here they used l'hopital's rule and l'hopital theorem has very specific formulation
yeah when you say "quotient rule" do you mean the quotient rule for derivatives or the property of quotients of limits? there seems to be some info missing that makes your question highly confusing
if you mean you want to find the limit and why not use the limit of quotient property, it's because it gives you an indeterminate form 0/0 so you are stuck, l'hospital's rule (see above) allows you to get out of this and involves taking the derivative of both numerator and denominator, but has preconditions and can't be applied blindly (in this case it is validly applied)
thank you so much guys, I misunderstood l'hospitals rule, I thought you took derivative but I see that is not how the rule works
I did the calculations in my head after finding a few of the cos nx formuas and the step where we find the RE([e^inx), i did some of the work on different n's and then found the pattern
simplification
differentiate h(t)
for rate of change in height
what is pre calculus
a name given in america to various things like trig, exponential functions, and sometimes combinatorics, all packaged into one class to be rushed in a year or so
i thought calculus was just differentiation and integration 😅
yes... and?
that doesn't contradict what i said
i described the typical contents of a precalculus class.
where do we use calculus in combinatorics
It's the other way around -- "precalculus" is a collection of topics that will later be used for calculus, not something that uses caclculus.
oh
yes
You confused $-f(x)$ with $f(-x)$ \ \ $-f(x)$ means you multiply $f(x)$ by $-1$, it should be nothing more than distributive property to do this.
Civil Service Pigeon
Why do you have to multiply it by -1
I got -3
This time
Is this correct?
@raw hill
$-f(x)=-\boxed{1}f(x)$
Civil Service Pigeon
You found $f(-1)$, your answer shouldn't be a constant.
Civil Service Pigeon
arre yar, civil service exam me calculus hai? arre bhai, ye kiya hogya?
hello! i'm reviewing some calculus, and i'd like to clarify the chain rule
i'm insecure in how do i recognize the various functions. each function would be an "operation"?
the power is considered a function?
x^2 the square is the function?
any operation is considered a function until i get the pure x by itself basically?
for any input x the function f(x)=x does nothing and returns the same input
it is
you can
let me try
all these "rules" are true in trivial cases as well as in more complicated ones
because they're proved in general form for any functions
well, differentiable obviously
idk, I need to look into your work
i was trying to apply the chain rule to 2x
let $f(t) = t, g(x) = 2x, h(x) = f(g(x))$, then $h'(x) = f'(g(x)) \cdot g'(x)$, but since $f'(t) = 1$ for any input $t$ you get $f'(g(x)) = 1$ and since $g'(x) = 2 \to h'(x) = 1 \cdot 2 = 2 = g'(x)$
Transparent_Elemental
would'nt it be the same as f(x) = 2g(x) where g(x)=x ??
yes
ok this makes sense
cool
thank you i think i've got it
so "function" is just any operation on the variable
no operation is still an operation
formally a function is something that takes an input and produces some output with the constraint that no input has multiple outputs
other details are irrelevant on how the transformation of the input to output happens
thank you
Yes
precalc
I've just finished vector calculus, moving onto undergrad linear algebra, and we've never used these identities lmao
it probably depends on the common cores taught
when is cos(x) 0?
Honestly tho memorising random obscure identities is a really inefficient way of learning maths and doesn't improve your actual mathematical ability
I honestly think "precalculus" is a scam lol, each subject/area of maths should be learnt properly and not solely for the purpose of calculus
Sum-to-product isn’t “obscure” tho!?
is there any good way to learn relation and functions, i mean for indian guys from yt?
what do you mean exactly
hey hello!
I have dy/dx = 1/cos(y) and i know sin(y) = x
i need to get back the x on the right side
my tought was sin^2(y) + cos^2(y) = 1
are you taking the derivative of arcsin(x)?
then you know y ∈ [-π/2, +π/2] and therefore you can say unambiguously that cos(y) = +sqrt(1-sin^2(y))
yes, my resoning was: oh it's equal to 1, so i can substitute it on top of 1/cos(y)
sin^2(y) + cos^2(y)/cos(y)
and simplifying i would get only sin^2(y)
congratulations, you've made your own life more complicated.
no you wouldn't
$\frac{\sin^2(y)+\cos^2(y)}{\cos(y)} \neq \sin^2(y)$
aoh yea
Ann
yes yes ok found the mistake lol
i was simplifying the cos as if it were a multiplication XD
ok
thank you 🙂
cry about it
cry about it
i really don't care what you say so just stop wasting your breath
LOL
I can't yet
But I wanna learn about vectors and matrices and polar equations and mathematical induction
you could have made your point without the use of "gay" as an insult.
please don't call me bro.
I think he's just mad that he never took precalc
literally have a she/her role
still get "bro"d on a daily fucking basis
if you want to yap about the american education system being bad then go to #discussion or better yet #chill
and
..You're the only one who has said that
you're kind of a loser ngl
harassing people over what math they're taking
get a life bozo
Im wasting my time with you
so are the two of you done arguing
mhm
someone pinged me but then deleted their message.
reported that idiot
you are an mod/admin, why not check the change-logs
you can see their deleted comment
i am in fact not a mod nor an admin.
could this code be rewritten in sigma notation
as i increases by 1, the swing distance decreases by 20%, and I am finding what the total swing distance amounts to as i approaches infinity (it is approaching 25)
it's just a geometric series
might as well optimize the code by doing math instead of doing for loops 
I don't want to code at all, trying to get a solution with pure maths
How would it be written in geometric series
oh that's sigma notation
i haven't taken a calculus class so I am still learning stuff
geometric series should be part of the high school program
because it's so simple to prove and use
my school never went past geometry and trig
geometric series was taught in algebra, but not summation notation
whatever, summation notation is nothing more than a notation
the results are independent of notation
i have the solution, just need to use summation notation
ah ok
What are these symbols?
subset and belongs to
Proper subset to be exact
I dont know the meaning of it can yall explain plz
have you done any set theory before?
Nope
set theory deals with sets, which is what mathematicians call collections of objects. a set is defined entirely by what objects belong (or don't belong) to it.
the symbol ∈ denotes this "belonging to" relationship: namely, when we write something like "x ∈ A", we say that the object x (whatever it may be) belongs to the set A.
the concept of "subset" is a bit trickier to explain, because it requires understanding what a set is. but it is a relation between sets, rather than between objects and sets as ∈ is.
we say that A is a subset of B (and write A ⊂ B) if everything that belongs to A also belongs to B.
you might want to pick up a discrete math textbook (or similar) to read more about set theory -- the one you are reading right now probably assumes the reader is familiar with these basic set-theoretic notions, so you'll struggle a lot without that.
In the book it stated "c ∈ [0,2]" so that mean c is between interval 0 and 2.
discrete math? I never learn that in school
Thanks for your response.
Epsilon
and I forgot what the U is
The epsilon means: belongs with
Even though the $\in$ symbol is historically derived from the Greek letter epsilon ($\epsilon$ or $\varepsilon$), in contemporary notation (at least since the mid-20th century) they are considered different symbols and it is wrong to write $\epsilon$ when you mean $\in$ or vice versa.
Troposphere
the same people who call \in "epsilon" would probably also call \emptyset "phi" and not think it ridiculous
lmaooo
hello
hello
are you good at calculus?
A line is its own tangent.
for the tangent of a curve though, the derivative
to calculate the derivative you can refer to the limit definition
There is no such term tangent to line, tangent itself is a line, we always say tangent to curve or surface
empty set isn't phi? my life has been a lie 
yes it has
No, I am in 10th grade.
whats the answer to the blank
need help
$sec(\theta) = \frac{1}{cos(\theta)}$
toto but mumble rap
look for $cos(\theta) = 0$
toto but mumble rap
because the vertical asymptotes occur at 1/0
the first step is to raise both sides of the equation by the log's base (2)
Price
Ann
ohh
so the limit at 6 would be 5?
Or would it be undefined
it has a solid point as well as an undefined point
no
5 is the value of the function at 6.
the limit of the function at 6 is 0, because that's the point you approach when you evaluate f at points that are close but not equal to 6.
then the limit would be 2 at x=4?
though it approaches, without reaching
does anybody recommend Advanced mathematics? (Textbook by John Saxon, and is pre calc)
The amplitude is the height of the wave
Hey precalculus people
I'm curious, how challenging is precalculus to you compared to algebra?
Like is this an easier or harder experience for you
That will also very much depend on what curriculum
so thos one would be 2 right?
think of precalculus as algebra 2 on steroids
is this aloud? Null factor law, except with not a 0?
no
