#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages ¡ Page 376 of 1
the width I just sent u would reduce to 4inches
so ur making a parallelogram now
with major distance of 4.5 and minor distance of 4
i mean the circle would eventually have to converge with the square
and continue straight
oh shit you might need a diffeq for this
wack
cause it has to be precise
help
exact?
yes exact
my teacher takes off marks if its not at the right measurement
yeah u help skibidy
@trim gust i found it
do u want me to explain the process or just give the exact number
@trim gust u still there?
yes I am sorry just finished skibidys thing
yes Im curious about the process
also @soft marten
lmk if u need any explanation of the proof
alright i can vc now so hop in math vc
kk coming
@trim gust howd u get c for 3x
If you want answet in cos and sin ,then change sec cosec in 1/cos , 1/sin then do calculation you will get your answer
proof of corresponding angles theorem anyone pls
Absolutely no idea
Anyone can help?
For 30 and 31
This is only level 3 but i already cant do it
There is like 5 levels
.
The two angles being pointed to is the two acute angles in an right triangle. Hopefully you know what their sum ought to be ...
What have you tried? And don't ask in multiple channels
We don't just solve stuff for you.
^
I can help you but Im not going to solve this for you and simply give you the answer.
Knowing that the top and bottom lines are parallel
What angle theorem can help you corrolate the angle 3x and angle x+2 ?
Does it have direction?
Outwards id imagine
If youâre scaling something either youâre expanding or compressing it
Depending on the scale factor itself
I mean not really
Outwards isn't a direction if outwards is different directions for multiple different sides
I'm stuck on this
"If youâre scaling something either youâre expanding or compressing it"
Yes but
A vector has a specific magnitude and a specific direction
A scalar just has a magnitude I think
Because think about it
If I am scaling a square by 2
The left side is going to the left more
And the right side is going to the right more
Why is this a valid explanation for the second part of this question?
The only way I could figure this out was by solving for the time it would take the boat and sub to reach the point where their paths crossed
similar sides are given so you can do either side1/side2 = area1/area2 or you can do side1/area1 = side2/area2
I got it thanks :)
please how do i do this
Actually drawing out the triangle would help considerably
draw the triangle and then apply the def of tangent
I feel like there's something silly I'm missing in here
there's probably some bash with trig and stewart's
are you sure you can't do it with some vector shit
yeah i reckon vectors is the best approach here
broadly what you want to do is
let AC = c; AB = b
express AE and AF in terms of b and c
then try to find how far G is along FE
Does anyone know what this is asking me to do?
Generally, be clever and find an argument tailored to each shape.
What I'm saying is I don't think there's a meaningfully common approach between the three parts.
(Other than perhaps draw the tilings, though that won't feel like much of a proof.
what is the altitude
i dont understand
I get the hypotenuse part but not the alittude
Does it have to be a proof?
Hmm, I suppose "show" does sound like a diagram of the tiling would suffice :-)
I believe a fundamental region is all the tiles in a plane tiling congruent to that single region
Yes.
what is altitude in geometric mean
An "altitude" in a triangle is a line through one of the corners that is perpendicular to the opposite side.
im stuck with this
So like, I'm still not sure what to do with the problems. I'm thinking of showing multiple n-gons in each shape, but do you think that would suffice?
so the altitude would be red line
Yes, and this divides the large triangle into two similar triangles.
oh ok ty
No, you shouldn't attempt to subdivide the given shape. You should show that multiple copies of them can be combined such that they tile the plane.
Hmm, I don't see the connection
Well I meant the whole tiling thing
The shapes you see in the problem are the tiles.
I'm tiling the fundamental region in a plane of them? Not tiling but combining multiple of them?
Like this?
Ngl drawing that was kinda satisfying
Yes!
And those hexagons can then be repeated to tile the entire plane.
So you're tiling the plane.
Not tiling the given shapes.
Ohh okay, I would wanna continue drawing em but that's a lot of work. Do you think explaining this whole idea would work?
Yeah. You can't avoid being a bit hand-wavy anyway because the figure in the problem doesn't rigorously state that the notches have the same shape and size anyway. :-)
Ah okay
@grave pond hi sorry about the ping but quick question about this shape. Am I combining them in the right way? I keep trying many combos but am not getting something that looks right
Yeah, pretty sure that is the intention.
For the third one you'll probably want graph paper :-)
What does it mean for a semi regular tiling has order 1 or order 2? Apparently in my textbook, these Kepler tilings are of order 1.
idk about vectors đŚ
alpha and beta are the roots of asinx+bcosx. you have to sub in both of those values and subtract the two equations to get a(cos(alpha)-cos(beta)) +b( sin(alpha)-sin(beta)) = 0
we then use the sin(a)-sin(b) and cos(a)-cos(b) formulas
we then get tan (alpha+beta/2)
then use the equations relating sin2x and cos2x to tanx
which... if u dont know... can be derived easily by dividing the standard formulas of sin2x and cos2x by cos^2x +sin^2x
does bisector line starts from one of vertex of polygon that splits it into equal area always passes through the centroid?
im getting both yes and no by googling
It will form a parabola right
Something like this we need to find y
But unable to
If I have a convex polygon, does a line starting at one of the vertices $v_i$ and passing through $\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^Nv_k$ halve the polygon's area?
criver
I am aware this is not the case if the line doesn't start from a vertex
on the other hand this seems to be true for triangles at least
Most definitely not for quadrilaterals in general
Imagine picking a point on a side of a triangle to be the 4th point
And move it slightly just so the new quadrilateral is convex
But since the âcentreâ has shifted towards the new point obviously the area condition will not hold anymore
That's not obvious to me
To be sure, the part about the center shifting is obvious, the part about the area condition being violated is not
Like um
Imagine the new vertex being moved by 0.01mm while the triangle was kilometres wide
Certainly that wouldnât compensate enough for the centre being shifted
(But this is by no means a proof)
So if a point D some distance below BC was constructed to form a new polygon ABCD with new centre Oâ, the condition would imply that area of BCD = twice the area of BTTâ
Which is not true, not just visually but also because as area of BCD approaches 0, area of BTTâ does not
Thank you for the sketch. I think I understood the argument. What is bothering me is whether O and O' really do not lie in the same line if D is chosen on the edge BC, or in your image whether BTT' really doesn't go to 0 as D approaches BC.
I should be able to construct a counterexample though
B =(-1, -1), C =(1,-1), A = (0, 2) -> c = (0,0), let D= (0,-1), the c_D = (0,-1/4)
Ok, that does it, this area really doesn't go to zero. Thank you.
It is true that the line through a vertex that divides the triangle into parts with equal areas always passes trough the centroid and vice versa. This line is the median
I don't think you will generally be understood if you call the line a "bisector". I initially understood that as "angle bisector", which is definitely not the same line as the median in general.
gotcha
i genuinely just dont understand how to do this
Hint: The values of AE and BC are not necessary to answer the question.
Hi, I was just wondering if it is possible to solve ${\tan x} = 2 - \surd{3}$ by hand?
LordEmrys
yeah, you just wont be able to get an approximate x value by hand
since arctan (2-sqrt(3)) is pi/12
you can do some stuff with compound angle identities
can someone help me with this
7+11 =18
its 1/9
generally you want to see how much the x value has changed from A to B (-18)
then how much the y value has changed (-2)
and slope = change in y á change in x
Prove that the length of median AM in triangle ABC is greater than (AB+AC-BC)/2
Rise over run. -3â>-5/7â>-11
Question: To show that three points A, B, C in R^2 are collinear, we find the vectors AB and AC and see if they are scalar multiples (since vectors are collinear if they are scalar multiples). But aren't A, B, and C ordered pairs, which are vectors? Is one of these statements wrong, or is there something I'm missing?
you find the vector b/w A and B
and the vector b/w A and C
(Sorry, what does b/w mean?)
between
Oh right thx
Yes, and I see why, but I don't have a good explanation for why we can't just check A=kB=k'C that doesn't rely on saying "Well, A, B, C are points, not vectors"
Is the best we can do to say that "Any vectors A, B, C are collinear if AB is a multiple of AC"?
cause points and vectors are synonymous pretty much in R^n spaces
if you know the vector equation of a line, then you're just finding the value of the parameter that reaches B and C on the line
person2709505
As opposed to the equation Ax+By+C=0
Actually, I think I get it- the first method is like translating A to the origin and seeing if (0,0), B, C are collinear. The second method makes the translation more explicit with the A term of the equation
I started off by constructing X on KV so that OX is perpendicular to KV and a Y on QR so that OY is perpendicular to QR. My professor then wants me to prove that it's a rectangle. Can someone help?
,rotate
I need help with this
@vagrant ore do you still need help with that?
@dark sparrow ya
have you found areas of circular segments before?
Nope
Yes I've done that
okay
are you able to find the area of this circular sector?
(all i want is a yes or a no, i don't want the value)
Yes
and are you able to find the area of this triangle?
No
why not?
I'm not sure what the height is
there is a formula for the area of a triangle which involves two sides and an angle between them
So would I cut the triangle in half?
Because I know the formula for finding the area of a triangle but I don't know the height or how to find it
there is not one formula for finding the area of a triangle.
the formula i was talking about here is $A = \frac{1}{2} a b \sin(\theta)$
Ann
no
Oh. Then what is it?
a and b are the sides which have the included angle in them.
Oh ok
This is essentially the same as 1/2bh.
For my question I only know 1 side how would I use this formula?
Well, there's something you could notice.
That's a circle.
I know you know that lol.
So, which sides are we talking about in the figure do you know that?
Let the centre be O, the other points on the circle be A and B.
Now tell me which sides are the ones you should put in the formula?
In terms of A B and O.
How do I find the other side?
Because if the center is o then let's say a = 27.8 then how would I get b?
Exactly, that's what I've been implying.
if you remember what a circle is, it should be obvious how long the other side is
.
I don't think you guys understand how dumb I am
See I thought that the diameter was the radius x 2
the diameter is equal to twice the radius, you're right about that
that's not the point
there are no diameters in your picture anyway
Is that because it's a circle..
Yes I know. That's what makes it hard to find the other side
No
so you don't know what a circle is.
so you don't know that a circle is defined as the set of all points at a fixed distance (the radius) from a fixed point (the center)?
Ya I know that
but this never occurred to you?
any point on a circle is by definition the exact same distance away from the center.
I just need to know how to find the other side
any point on a circle is by definition the exact same distance away from the center.
and that distance is called the radius.
I know
i guess i need to say this even more explicitly
any line segment joining a point on a circle to its center has the same length
If the formula you said I should use is correct then just skip to telling me what I need to do to find the other side
I know it's not the same as the radius
27.8
look at the green side...
That side is unknown
is it not blindingly obvious that it joins a point on the circle to the center...
no it couldnt
It's not 27.8
Ok calm down
and this green line is equal to the radius!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ok got it sheesh
i mean like
you say you know that all points on a circle are by definition the same distance away from the center
but then you say that the green line could be anything
despite it being a line that joins the circle to its center
do you maybe have a mental disconnect between distance and length of a line segment
You know what. I'm going to find help somewhere else..
You're clearly not fit to teach
depending on how basic, anywhere in the pre-university category.
or you could post in a questions channel.
if you post in the wrong channel you'll get redirected anyway.
is that exactly what the question says, and nothing else?
"What is within 2 and 5?"
Yes
can you take a picture of the question in the book
and the answer key if you have it
Is between and within the same?
no, these aren't the same word
would have appreciated "no, i'm not able to take any pictures right now"...
You know what, thank you
Im gonna just ask the teacher
Unclick the checkmark in #get-advanced-access.
Can somebody help me with the intuition here? I feel like I can't remember why this makes sense. He solves the y function for x and somehow that represents the distance of the function from the y-axis?
(ignore the x=-2 line, that's for a further explanation)
I'm not sure what x represents here.
"distance from the y-axis" is what an x-coordinate is.
but isnt a coordinate a point
so how could a point also be a distance
helop
what r very important theorems to know
in general
Brahmaguptaâs formula, point to line distance formula, area of a triangle given vertices, Stewartâs Theorem, Ptolemyâs Theorem, Mass points, inradius and circumradius, Cevaâs Theorem, and Theorem of Menelaus.
acc just explain what these r
acc i can just search them up
does anyone know how to practice geometry problems
like a website or smth for that?
are you looking for competition-like problems?
yea
AoPS forum maybe
i've never heard of brahmagupta's formula
I think itâs the formula for cyclic quad area given all sides
huh, don't remember that one, but it seems plausible
have you heard of heron's formula?
yes, but i don't remember what it is
can someone help me with my trig work
please and thank you
you dont need to find the answers for me, i just need help writing down the formulas and i can punch it into my calculator lol
draw diagram now
angle of elevation is the angle between the horizontal line and the line of sight
you're gonna form an orthogonal triangle
core trigonometry đŠ
Functions that form graphs when put with angles idk im not smart
How do I calculate the volume of tetrahedron if the sum of all edges is 72cm?
Do you know the tetrahedron is regular? Otherwise I don't think you can.
it is
So you should be able to compute the common side length. Figure out the area of an equilateral triangle with the side length (which will be your base), then compute the height from that base, and plug into the formula for the volume of a generic pyramid.
Looks generally like a formula of the right shape, but I've not done the calculation myself.
Can anyone help me find the phase shift and period
You can probably look up resources that can explain this better than I can, but I can try:
Phase shift: The horizontal distance the graph is moved from the parent graph (with no phase shift). You can find this by figuring out how "offset" this is from the parent, and in what direction. Now you may not have a phase shift (sometimes phase shift = 0).
Period: The distance between two consecutive peaks = the distance between two consecutive troughs = twice the distance between a peak and the next trough
Does anybody know how to solve this?
TIL that we can't do modular arithmetic with real numbers or even rational numbers because, while addition and subtraction are well-defined, multiplication doesn't work: 2/3 is the same as â1/3 and 3/5 is the same as â2/5, but (2/3)â (3/5) doesn't end up being the same as (â1/3)â (â2/5).
But this raises another question: What kind of spaces are circles, cylinders or torus then? I can clearly do some geometry on them. On a circle, I can add and subtract (but not multiply) points (angles). On the surface of cylinders/torus/sphere, I can draw shapes like triangles and translate them around. But are operations like scaling a shape or rotating a shape on these surfaces not well-defined at all?
scaling is not well-defined yes
unless like, you consider it locally or something
and that only on flat surfaces like the torus or cylinder
A=A circlesector- A triangle
First find the area of the arc:
A=80/360 ĂĎĂ5²=50Ď/9
Then find the area of the triangle:
A=5Ă5Ăsin80/2=12.5sin 80
Subtract the area of the arc from the area of the triangle:
(50Ď/9)-(12.5sin 80)â5.1cm²
@torn meteor do not give out answers.
Can I solve for theta in this polygon given a,b,c?
yo, my friend and I are trying to find the length of the side of the octagon, on the following image:
the symbol that looks like an "empty set" is the diameter of the circle its pointing at
I'm really not sure what to do here
seems like the apothem of the octogon is 25, since Its the length 50 divided by 2
I'm really confused
Thus, 25¡2sin(2pi/16)
(Fixed a typo, sorry)
Cut the octagon in 16 little congruent triangles. Each of them is right-angled, and you have just computed that the long leg has length 25. The angle adjacent to that leg is such that 16 of them just fit together around the circle.
Ooooooooooh
Thanks, I think I got It
Wait, sorry to bother again, but woudn't I need tangent, instead of sine?
I don't have the hypothenuse
but I have both sides
Whoops yes, you're completely right. Always check the work of random people you meet on the internet before you believe it!
Oooh, all right, thanks!!! :))
A shortcut approach could be to write x/sqrt(2) + x + x/sqrt(2) = 50 (where each term corresponds to one of the sides of the octagon that is not perpendicular to the 50-mm diameter) and solve for x.
did anyone help you with this?
that should be just sqrt of the sum of 4^2 and 8^2
since 11-7 is 4 and 5-(-3) is 8
Question: Letâs say you have f(x)=1/8(x-2)^2. On a graph, this is expressed as a parabola. If you remove the square, the shape of the line changes into a regular diagonal. Why does the square completely change the direction of the line?
The reason I used such a seemingly random equation is because this was the problem that brought the question to mind and I apologize if this is has a really obvious answer, Iâve just never been told why that is, only that thatâs how it works.
is the slope 1/8 or is the (x-2)^2 in the denominator of the fraction?
(X-2)^2 isnât part of the denominator no
also its because of how negatives don't exist in even exponents
Shouldâve put a space there probably
and so the negative x value to y is the same as positive x value to y
the reason why absolute values dont work here because of how parabolas take on the curvature of an ln graph and absolute value takes the tendency of a linear graph since its a direct relationship
@inland estuary did you get it?
the curvature is also from the square itself
because now each y value from the x is squared too
making the rate of change non-linear
absolute values have no squares (unless the function itself has a square) and so they have a linear change in rate
so the answer is option 1
yeah
you just have to think about the Pythagorean theorem
since AB, distance between x-values, and distance between y-values make a right angle triangle
and you can find the distance between y-values and distance between x-values
and your "C" is AB
so just do $$sqrt(A^2+B^2)$$
Omega Warrior
sqrt didnt work right lol
yeah
but you get what i mean
yeah thanks alot
yeah np
That makes sense, thank you!
yeah np đ
$\sqrt{A^2 + B^2}$
Ann
if you're going to use latex then use the things latex provides you
Hey, please read this question and tell me where I am going wrong.
According to me this question is wrong because they are asking for the locus of a point which is fixed.
Explaination- A FIXED CIRCLE is given and A FIXED PARABOLA is given. Now, since both of them are fixed, their points of intersection would also be fixed. Since their points of intersection are fixed, the chord between the points of intersection will also be fixed. Since the chord is fixed, its mid-point will also be fixed.
NOW IF THE MID-POINT IS FIXED, how can they ask for it's locus?
Btw, the answer is x^2+y^2-2x-2y=0
i mean if you really are right and theres only one possible place for this midpoint then its locus consists of one point
thats not really an egregious error or anything
but also lets graph this
Now, since both of them are fixed, their points of intersection would also be fixed.
sure, the points of intersection of the parabola and the circle are fixed. so what?
we're not interested in those
we're interested in the intersections between the chord (or rather the straight line containing it, presumably) and the parabola.
@tiny stirrup
Am hello
just paste it
I mean... I haven't seen those angle pair names in a while, but it seems pretty self explanatory
I'm assuming interior means between the parallel lines and exterior means outside
yeah, but the chord will be at the point of interesection right?
??
something like this, except i didn't draw the chord (yet) but instead a segment on the line containing it
specifically, this is the segment intercepted by the chord
where did that black line come from?
what do the green lines represent? x=y and x=-y???
you know what, maybe I am misunderstanding the question, could you please explain it to me?
no, the green lines represent the lines y = mx and y = (-1/m)x, i.e. a pair of perpendicular lines through the origin
where m is unknown and variable
they illustrate the 'subtend a right angle at the origin' condition
okay, then how does the circle play any role in this?
to say it very roughly we have this green cross that can rotate freely about the origin. it intersects the parabola in two points (not cutting the origin)
these two points define a straight line
and we have to determine the mid-point of the line segment between those two points??
no
we are supposed to look at the chord that is cut out of the circle (that's where it comes in) by the straight line which contains this segment
chord that is cut out of the circle? are you talking about the chord of the circle or the chord of the parabola?
If it is the chord of circle, how can it cut out of the circle?
chord of parabola right?
and consider THAT line and the circle
okay, but i considered the common chord between the parabola and the circle.
how is that wrong?
it's wrong because it completely ignores what the question asks of you
when the question mentions, "the chord of a circle x^2+y^2=4", what does it mean by "chord"? A line segment? or a straight Line???
let me take a moment to let that sink into me!
no no, i get it
because i have no idea how the fuck to do any of this crap algebraically as youre expected to do
somewhat
wanna take a look at the solution?
T=S1 is the formula for equation of the chord where T is the tangent and S1 is the power of midpoint of the chord.
to summarise, the circle has infinite chords. some of those chords also happen to be the chords to this parabola. And out of those some chords, some happen to form right angle at the origin. And we just calculated the midpoint of those some chords? right???
yes it appears so
okay, thank you so much!

It depends on what difficulty it is
What grade ?
9th grade
I could be able to help you
Thanks
I don't know how to solve that but Sakata here can help you
Yes
So
Do you know any relation about the central angle subtended by an arc and an angle on the circumference on the circle?
No
for question two ?
Yes
use this
Ok thx
mb oops
Ok thx guys
Np thanks again
iâll keep that in mind next time :>
nppp
In a triangle PQR angle P is 90°. PS is altitude. From S are drawn SA and SB respectively perpendicular to PQ and PR. C is an arbitrary point on line segment AB. The line perpendicular to SC meets PQ at L and PR at M.\
Prove that circumcircle of triangle PLM passes through S.\
If $C_1$ is another arbitrary point of line segment AB and the line perpendicular to $SC_1$ ,meets PQ at $L_1$ and PR at $M_1$. Prove that $\frac{LL_1}{MM_1}$ is a constant.
Sakata Yaksha
can someone help me with this
u know the standard eq. of a circle?
assume that h and k are 0 btw... tho it isnt mentioned in the questions.. the options make it obvious
so the answer is option 1
Ur getting the idea... but ur not exactly right
Remember, the standard eq. Of a circle at the centre is x^2+y^2=r^2
Read the question one more time.. youll get it
so it is option 3
Whats your resoning behind that?
so the Diameter of a circle = d = 2r = 10 units
so the radius of a circle is 5 units
K.. youre right till here.. you made one tiny mistake after this. Read the standard eq of the circle again
x²+y²=r²
'r²'
oh i got so the answer is 25
thanks
Can you solve this?
sin-šx+tan-šx=45
I was solving it and found out there can be 4 answers.
I got x to be -1
But now I'm stuck
After some angle chasing you can prove that angle CLA=b which implies that SCAL is cyclic => angle SLC=a => MPLS is cyclic
Im sorry emanuel, but i havent leant inv trig yet.. so i cant help you
But you know how to solve cubic equations right?
Well I have some formulae to solve it but it will give a quartic equation. I got x=-1 but the rest is still unknown.
Hnn, can we write tan-1x as sin-1x/cos-1x?
Z
No
But sin-šx=tan-š(x/â1-x²)
Idk what to do with that... tho if you coukd make the equation from a sum to a product... it would probs be easier
Nvm.. i guess that wont work
Just use the formula to convert inverse sine to inverse tangent.
Then use this: tan-ša+tan-šb=tan-š(a+b/1-ab)
Oh theres a formula like that huh
One sec
Im not gettin anythin
Im kinda tired rn, its 12 00 here. Mabye ill try again tmrw
Tho im curious... how did u get -1 as a solution?
Surface area is
[ 4\pi\cdot r^2 ]
So
[ 4\pi\cdot r^2 = \frac{8788}{3}\pi \implies 4r^2=\frac{8788}{3}\implies r=\frac{13\sqrt{39}}{3} ]
And volume is
[ \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 ]
So you just need to plug in the $r$ you found into $\frac{4}{3}r^3$
Thanks @quartz bough
YOU ALL ARE A FR MATH WIZARDS

yall gotta talk to someone who actually knows math, like someone with honorable or a mod
You're enough buddy
What gradw are you all on?
10th
or I
the one who taught Euler everything he knew
wrong screenshot
I need help finding the area of the Pentagon. I found the area of the circle is 50.24 and now I'm stuck
try splitting the pentagon into a few triangles
I'm not sure how to do that. Like by splitting the numbers too
draw lines from the centre to each vertex
Ok so I have 5 triangles so how do I find the area of one of them
I want to know what numbers to use because I know how to find the area of a triangle
if you know how to find the area of a triangle, you should be able to find the areas of those triangles
So tommorow I have an exam which include geometry ( Triangles, Quadrilateral and circles ), is there anyway I can finish all of this in 1 day? Cuz I know nothing
There is like 106 theory or smth
đ¤
What 106 theory 
Whatever English not my first language
đ
Is there any single chance ?
AAAAAAA
Looks like I won't waste time on it then
if its just basic 2d geometry then it should be doable
but you should've already building up that knowledge throughout the semester
Also this is the wrong way to view exams in general
If you totally give up this time
Next time youâll still face the same dilemma
Of not being able to catch up
Unless youâre deciding to drop the entire subject 
the first step uses the identity cos2x = cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)
does that sound familiar?
not really, not familiar with that identity
oh err
it's quite important
I mean, I haven't taken a trig heavy class in years, I am in calc 2 and we only run into the double angle identity maybe like a few times in the whole class?
important for trig stuff anyway
A lot of it is just other identities, to be honest
I get that it's a double angle
after reading about it more
But I don't understand how to factor it still
cosx =cosx^2x-sin^2x?
factoring 2cos^2x - cosx - 1 =0
let cosx = u
that gives 2u^2 - u -1 =0
which is just a simple quadratic that shouldn't be too difficuly
how did you get rid of the sin?
from here, sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x)
\begin{align*}
\cos(x) &= \cos^2(x) - \sin^2(x) \
&= \cos^2(x) - (1 - \cos^2(x)) \
&= 2\cos^2(x) - 1
\end{align*}
twiceshy
cos(2x) at the start
they're solving an equation
Perhaps if they wrote out the first line as the equation it would be better
How do I solve this one?
Find the area of the circle and the area of the triangle, then reason to find the type of proportion between them you want
So like if it was if it falls in the triangle, you'd do (area of triangle)/(area of full circle)
That's NOT the proportion you want but idk how else to explain that without an example
How do I solve this one?
first draw this on a piece of paper and then add the lengths you already know
hey, does anybody know the steps from left to right? I tried rewriting the cosine part as sine and end up with sin(pi*(x-2)/x)/sin(pi/x)
I... really don't like here that x->(infinity)
Although I'm not a mathematician or planning to go for math major, I could suggest changing that x->infinity to x->0, right....?
Sorry, x->0+ to be precise
thanks
this would go in #calculus
and it is in the form sin(0)/cos(pi/2) which you can use l'h on, so i would think that is what they did
what have you tried?
I am stuck on this question
where are you stuck
idk what to do
start by trying to find the measure angle CFE
How would I go about solving this?
,rccw
I got the answer (I think)
Is angle of elevation/depression always 90 degrees?
The angles of depression of two boats from the top of a cliff are 31° and 23° respectively. If the two boats are 150 m apart, find the height of the cliff above sea level, correct to the nearest m.
I have done something wrong I can feel it
@dusky surge where you at bro
ty
oh, sorry and thank you
Previous question maybe???
I want learn Euclidean syntheitic geometry any book you recommend
write it down on paper and fill in as many angles as you can
we're not here to do your homework, we're here to help you understand and guide you into the right direction
first figure out the ratio of the polygons' sizes
No there was supposed to be a second triangle
But there wasnât
I was thinking maybe the second triangle was on a previous question
Subtract the make a fraction
I need help with a Geometry mapping issue
The goal is to create a hexagon from equilateral triangles generated in from the center in a clockwise motion
I have a functional loop that represents the current 'ring' and the current 'edge' being created
code:
int i = 0;
int r = 0;
Vector3 p = Vector3.zero;
for (int ring = 0; ring < gridSize; ring++)
{
for (int edge = 0; edge <= ring * 6; edge++)
{
Verts.Add(new Vector3(
p.x + 0.2f * (float)Math.Cos(ring * 60 * Math.PI / 180f),
p.y + 0.2f * (float)Math.Sin(ring * 60 * Math.PI / 180f),
p.z + 0));
p = Verts[Verts.Count - 1];
if (i >= 2)
{
int shift = ((ring - 1) * 6) + edge;
if (shift % 2 == 0)
{
Tris.Add(i);
Tris.Add(i - shift );
Tris.Add(i - 1);
}
if (shift % 2 != 0)
{
Tris.Add(i);
Tris.Add(i - shift );
Tris.Add(i - shift - 1);
}
i++;
}
r += ring * 6;
} }
I fear my calculations and assumptions are wrong
R at the bottom is an accumulator so it should yield in order 0,6,18,36,60...
Youâre probably better off asking in the Unity discord or some other h programming discord @grizzled lichen
can someone help me with this
I'm pretty sure mFGH = 90 because it goes to points F and H which is a semi-circle. So 180/2=90
âŚuuhh
how do you do this?
if the diameter is 16.4. The radius is 8.2. And since it's a right 45-degree triangle, both sides are 8.2. Meaning the answer is 8sqrt2
Oh Iâm sorry. Iâm not sure then
I realized my mistake. I calculated the length of JM, not the arc.
does anyone know the formula for this
tyyy
Prove that the diagonal of the 3D parelelogram ( not a native english speaker ) ABCDA1B1C1D1 cuts through the center of the triangle BDA1
In Unity you should probably be using Mathf instead of Math, and there's also a Deg2Rad and Rad2Deg (just a little easier)
can someone help me with
what is the slope of y = mx + b?
if you know that, then you can rewrite the equation in that form and you're done
so the answer 2/3
correct
thanks
Can anyone help me on this question?
For a quadrangle ABCD inscribed in a circle O, two diagonal lines are perpendicular to each other. Define E as the point where the two diagonal lines meet, and F as the foot of a perpendicular line to line AB drawn from C. The radius of the circumcircles of triangle AEF and BCF are 1 and 2 each. Find the area of Circle O.
a)Ď
b)3Ď
c)4Ď
d)5Ď
e)7Ď
(Angle ABC is not 90°.)
Yes, this question did not give any drawings or whatsoever.....
then draw it urself, it would make it a lot easier yk
Yeah, I've tried several times before asking this here.
- How do I use the radius of circumcircle of triangle AEF?
- You could draw a circumcircle of quadrangle ECBF- how do you use this advantage though
Or, does this question lack information?
<@&286206848099549185>
pls try not to ping helpers unless you're in a help channel.
Edit:Nobody solved this. Fine, I did it myself. Here's the solution:
||law of sine saves the day.||
Could someone help explain what the construction of these two are?
ruler and compass constructions of ab and a/b
I have a more etymological question. Does anyone know why the barycenter of a triangle got that name?
from Ancient Greek βιĎĎĎ (barĂşs) 'heavy', and ÎşÎνĎĎον (kĂŠntron) 'center') (Wikipedia)
you can just search anything online these days, you don't have to ask
i tried that but this is not what i am searching. i am trying to find the connection between the weight which in greek is βιĎÎżĎ Î˛ÎąĎĎ ÎşÎľÎ˝ĎĎÎż barycenter and the intercept point of the three medians of a triangle
because it is the center of mass
What exactly do you mean
if you take a triangle and want to balance it on exactly one point the barycenter is that point at which it is balanced
like this (from here https://math.stackexchange.com/a/3454865)
Thank you very much
a) At the local ice rink, popcorn is sold in a square-based pyramid-shaped container with side lengths of 15 cm and a height of 21 cm. Calculate how much popcorn this container will hold.
b) After a hockey game at the local arena, a tired player gets a drink from the water cooler. The water cups provided have a conical shape with a diameter of 11 cm and a height of 12cm. How much water will fit into this cup?
c) A basketball has a diameter of 24.8 cm. How much air does it take to fill this basketball?
d) During the holiday season, a company packages their chocolates in a box shaped like a pyramid. The base of the box is a square with side lengths of 10 cm. The pyramid is 12 cm high. Calculate the amount of packaging needed for this pyramid-shaped box.
e) A new popsicle on the market has the shape of a cone with a radius of 1.5 cm and a height of 15 cm. Calculate the surface area of this popsicle so that the company will know at least how much packaging may be necessary.
f) A chocolate in the shape of a sphere is packaged by wrapping it in colored foil. If the chocolate has a radius of 1.8 cm, calculate the amount of foil needed to package the candy. Draw a diagram.
@fossil pier I think, you second step is not necessary.
yeah I just noticed that but ty
bc the angle dB and angle ae are un the given already
and marked
so that's how I knew
could u check this one
@sinful gyro
how?
Hello people I'm looking for a coordinate geometry course for computer vision underpinnings of mathematical and physical-based prerequisites are coordinate geometry, linear algebra
So, would someone mind helping me to recommend to take one..
How come the 2nd question got an answer of 77mm. Can someone mind interpretin it?
It sounds pretty strange that an answer in millimeters can be produced for a question with only unitless numbers in it.
It makes some numeric sense that (400:600:1200) = (24:36:72), but how the 72 suddenly becomes millimeters is a mystery.
I think it is somewhat conventional for "focal length" for digital cameras to mean the focal length of an imagined lens that would give the same field of view with a 24Ă36 mm image sensor (that is, the standard frame size on chemical film). However, that doesn't help us here -- we still don't know the resolution the image coordinates are given in. (They can't be pixels; that would be ridiculously low resolution; they also can't be millimeters on the usually imagined 24Ă36 mm sensor because that would place the image point far outside the sensor; the origin of the coordinate system is in the center of the sensor).
The numbers represent the surface areas?
You can set the surface areas of each different face to be p, q, r
Then obtain 3 linear equations in p,q,r
to clarify: we want the surface area of one block given the surface areas of each of those composite blocks, yes?
@upper karma
okay
let p be the area of the top/bottom face, q be the area of the front/back face and r be the area of the left/right face
then we have 2p+4q+4r = 72, 4p+2q+4r = 102 and 4p+4q+2r = 96
Add all the equations to get a value for 10(p+q+r).
The side lengths also work out nicely.
wow you are smart
dont know much but i think the brackets around x-3 in the second problem refer to absolute value
so if x=-3 then [x-3] would be 6
those are not brackets those are absolute value bars
also best not to divulge any info when OP is choosing not to say anything beyond posting the questions
oh yeah that too
Guys i need help with this one
So i basically need to find radius R, radius r, angle v, and the area of the dark grey area
a) radius R.
b) radius r, as in Figure 5.
c) angle v, as in Figure 5.
d) the area og the "dark grey area", (Figue 5)
could you translate this please
The picture shows a vent hood on the roof of an HTX-Building engineering workshop. The upper part of the vent hood is designed as two frusto bumps. The one truncated cone with target is shown in Figure 4. The truncated cone is made of a thin plate and the unfolded truncated cone is shown as a "Grey" area in Figure 5.
At the calculations, the plate thickness is disregarded.
a) Determine radius R.
b) Determine radius r, which is shown in figure 5.
c) Determine the angle v, shown in figure 5.
d) Detmine the area of the "gray" area.
Hope you understand my translation...
uh
does anyone know how to do dilations
i need help learning how to do this shit bro
my geometry teacher can't teach to save his life
if anyone knows how to explain it simply unlike some grown ass men with feather dusters as a mustace
please ping me
sin (90 deg + x deg)= sin 90 deg + sin x deg = sin x deg?
oop
$\sin(\alpha+\beta) = \sin(\alpha)\cos(\beta)+\cos(\alpha)\sin(\beta)$
Brontochad (Shuri for honorable)
guys, how can i proof that 1/h²=1/b²+1/c²
One way: Multiply through by h², and then 1=sin²+cos².
Another way (at least superficially): The area of the large triangle is ah/2 = bc/2. Multiply the LHS of the equation by a²h² and the RHS by b²c². This yields a²=b²+c².
why would you have doubt in all your 10 answers?
we're not here to do your homework
I don't need the answer, but how do i go about working this out, obvs a is 86 because its parrellel but not im stuck lol
@runic zinc they're not gonna help you brođ
i done asked twice now
what part do you not understand
use triangles. Sum of angles add to 180.
literally everything brah
that's why i've been asking somebody if they can simplify it for me cause my geometry teacher can't do that
dilation is essentially
you have a centre of dilation and a scale factor
lets say your shape is called A
for each corner of your shape A, take the line between that corner and the centre of dilation
multiply the length of that line by the scale factor, and that will give you the new point after the transformation
do that for each point and you will have the transformed shape
hint: for two parallel lines you can draw a line between the two which meets both at 90°
You could try opening the cos(A+B) using the identity cos(A+B)=cosAcosB-sinAsinB
Haven't done trigo identities in forever so nothing else comes to mind really
I did that and got $\frac{(1 - \cos A)(1 + \cos B) + \sin A \sin B}{(1 + \cos A)(1 - \cos B) + \sin A \sin B}$
LazyKnight
it seems like the right way to do
but there's probably some identity I don't know about ):
nvm finally got it lol
Solve.
is that a command? 
\solve
i meant 'are you commanding me to solve it' but thanks lol
i know 
wait
that's not a command is it 
not sure, we could try it though đ edit: nope, lol
well there's always wolfram
30 deg, trickyy
Bing-
-bong?
The law of Sines, does it have to follow the order of a = b = c? Or can it be a = c?
equality is transitive
a = b = c implies that a = c yeah
110 + 15/60 is what?
Ah, my bad. 110.25
Yes.
@upper karma pls dont just give answers
@upper karma pls dont just ask for answers, show what u tried
tysm
I just want to know if im right
u posted no work of ur own
Can someone help me with this
if a+b+c=Ď Then prove that Cot(a)+ cot(b)+ cot(c)=cot(a)cot(b)cot(c)
So I'm looking to include something in my plugin that causes two particles to go around in a spiral trailing behind a projectile in Minecraft, I can get a circle to spiral around easily enough horizontally, but I'm not too sure how to make it follow and change based on the yaw/pitch of the projectile (can't really set the velocity of a particle more than once, so it actually keeps spawning more in). Any ideas?
If you draw a line parallel to the downward-sloping one, through the intersection where 36° is marked, you can move all the angle measures to that intersection.
I mean, just move the indications of angle sizes down to that intersection.
Or, perhaps slightly easier to argue, do it this way:
yo
a=48
a+2a+36=180
yup
someone already typed me it in dms
i was just too blind and didn't see it
oh ok
thank you for your effort tho
feels good knowing that i am not stupid but only half stupid and half blind 
c and d
So for this problem Iâm solving for angle B. I used both law of cosine and sines to solve for B and they gave me similar answers. I put in the answer from law of cosine and it says my answer is wrong and counted my answer from law of sines correct. So my question is: is there a specific formula to use to find an angle?
Are you sure it's not just rounding error?
It looks like your law-of-cosines calculation is using intermediate results with a fairly low number of significant digits.
I'm assuming that the "it" that declared the results wrong and correct is an auto-grading system that doesn't see your actual work.
Iâve checked my answer 3 times for law of cosine, I keep getting the same answer. So I assume that it just went for law of sines
Do you also keep rouding your intermediate results to the same number of digits?
For example the value for a you write as 12.20 is more precisely 12.198074809815519.
The problem asked me to round my answer to the nearest hundredths, so I just rounded to the nearest hundredths for anything answer I get
Your intermediate values are not "answers". They're intermediates.
Ah okay
One of your lines even seems to mix 12.19 with 12.20.
Yes, I messed up there but I fixed it earlier. I still got the same answer after that
The -335.24 was suppose to be -335.84. I still got 10.54 (rounded) as my answer
I agree that 12.20²+14²-3² is 335.84. However, with the better approximation of a above, the value of a²+14²-3³ is closer to 335.7930290659.
You see that several hundredths of error have already crept in.
The number you write as 341.6 should be closer to 341.5460946748.
Let me check my work again
These rounding errors make the input to the final arrcosine slightly different from what it ought to have been. The value is already pretty close to 1, which magnifies the effect errors in the input has. As a result of that error, the arccos gives you 10.53664° whereas with better approximations you would have gotten 10.53111°.
So I shouldnât round my intermediates and only round my final answer?
Right. If possible keep them in computer/calculator memory, and if you have to write them down, write several more digits of them than you want your final result to have.
When I try on my computer I get the same answer for the law-of-sines and law-of-cosines calculutions, up to the ~16 digits of precision my calculator program outputs.
Though if I round a to 12.2 like you do, the arcsine only gives 10.52943°.
The arcsine only gives 10.52943° if you only round a to 12.2?
Yeah,
; asin(sin(48*deg)*3/12.2)/deg
~10.52942884319477848251
whereas
; asin(sin(48*deg)*3/a)/deg
~10.53110964429801571849
A point (2,3) is translated by (2,1) and scaled by (5,5). Find the new coordinates of the point.
The Ans : 20,20
Its 2D transformation related to computer vision
Can someone plz interprett how come the ans 20,20
can anyone please help me understand this?
After the translation the point is at (4,4).
I need major help on a math question
so uhh
is this one
Ive mirrored over the shape
to get
but now I need to elaborate on why the line hits point z
and why cant it go out of the semicircle
like this
I suspect its something to do with the right angle
and im trying to see what would happen if I extended the line out of the semicircle
but still kept angle BDC at 90 degrees
plz help
oh also
Thank you for trying to solve but I did this way after adding those (2,3)+(2,1) in column and multiplying (scaled up) with (5,5)
Sol:(20,20)
I need to know why line DZ cant be inside the semicircle aswell

