#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 368 of 1
ok interesting
cos(A)^2 + sin(A)^2 = 1
ahhh
you know sin(A), plug in and solve for cos(A)
you fellas are smart
you can make it = 1 using pythag?
am i correct in saying that
why would you do that tho ?
its not supposed to be cos(a)
its supposed to be sin(a+b)
Sin(A+B) = 20/65 + (CosA)(SinB)
this is where im at right now
you need cos(A) and sin(B)
you have sin(A) and cos(B)
that's what cos(A)^2 + sin(A)^2 = 1 is for
so do i only do a triangle to satisfy (CosA)(SinB)
you have sin(A), plug it in and you can solve for cos(A) for your formula
don't need to draw anything
Sin(20/65 + B) = 20/65 + (CosA)(SinB)
is this what you mean fella?
ohhh ye
don't mess with the left side
you can solve for it
from
cos(A)^2+sin(A)^2=1
we'll do it together
what's sin(A)
you tell me, it's a number you were given
cos(A)^2 + (5/13)^2 = 1
nice, keep going and rearrange it until you have cos(A)=...
cos(A)^2 = 0.86
im getting a pretty large fraction do you want me to stick with it
Technically not large but disgusting looking
it gets smaller soon
yeah, good, well technically could be + or - that when you square root
i got told you assume its a + as a mathematician
no
because when dealing with functions you cant get 2 different outputs
the sqrt symbol itself is +
so you assume its +
but when you square root something to solve it, you have two possibilities that it could have came from
I'll say it again, $\sqrt{x}$ is positive because we define it this way, that's true. But don't confuse this with saying every time you square root in the process of solving something that it's positive. When you're solving things, there are two possible ways to make 144/169 by squaring, you could have squared 12/13 or -12/13
Merosity
maybe it matters ¯_(ツ)_/¯
it definitely matters
when does it matter
you're gonna have more than one possible solution
any time you square root while solving a problem it matters
1 solution is more than enough
if you just see sqrt(144/169) written down by someone else, then it means +
lol no it's not
ofc it is
if I ask you where does the parabola x^2 - 1 hit the x-axis and you only give me one solution, it's wrong
I'm just the messenger
alright i think i understand how to solve these now but ive got much tougher questions coming up
they are pretty tough so
i might pop in again
20/65 + 12/13 * sinB
how do i solve for sinB
acc wait
ok nah i dont know
do the same thing we did to get cos(A)
except since you want to get sin(B), you have to plug in cos(B)
ye but that only works with cos(A)^2+sin(A)^2=1
hmm
so like this cos(b)^2+sin(b)^2 = 1
@wise pawn
sinb = 3/5
ad/ac=sin30=1/2 angle cad=60 cos60=ac/ab and use pythagoras theorem to find cb
Don't ping anyone randomly
If the polar distance of the star is 2°30’, what is its declination?
anyone know how to do this
pls im really stuck
u have to prove congruence using theorems like asa
Those who are now in calc, does anyone really remember the formulas for the trig stuff?
B
A=B
Y=X
D=R6
They can't be equal to length of outer triangle
?
No idea about that
😭
Oh yeah they are half of corresponding parallel sides
But still confirm it with helpers
im not sure if what i did is correct can someone help tysm!
the task: construct a Poincaré disk with two distinct hyperbolic triangles. The vertices need not all be distinct, and may not all lie on infinity.
well the marked points do not seem to be the vertices of any triangles
however you did draw a collection of lines that forms two triangles
so it looks like you did what you were asked for
can anyone help me with this? I don;t know how to do this
wait how about this
,rotate
which question are you confused in?
i got it now
?
can someoe please help me with this questin?
?
Do you know the relationship between any of those angles?
😢 😢
Do you know what a transversal is
Given: cot38∘=43andsin33∘=47. Find sin104∘.
How do I solve this
thanks! @dark sparrow
hint: sin(104) = sin(2 * 33 + 38)
let me tell you a fun abbreviation u might know
Some Old Hags: sin = opposite/hypotenuse
Cant Always Hide: cos=adjacent/hypotenuse
Their Old Age: tan= opposite/adjacent
these are the 3 trigonomic functions
think about the area of a parallelogram
try to express it in the form of $\sin(\frac{\alpha}{2})$ and $\sin(\frac{\beta}{2})$
LazyKnight
If I'm correct, 66 + 6x-6 = 180
and after finding what 6x-6 is
simply do answer of 6x-6 + -10y-4 = 180
and then after having the answer for -10y-4
do -10y-4 + -10z+4 = 180
$$\frac{x^2}{2}
Can someone help with this question please?
I've tried many approaches (like directly subbing in x into the equation and writing them all in terms of sin and cos)
I just need like a hint or a start
consider: sec^2(θ) - tan^2(θ) = 1
pls help me with this question
Guys does anyone know how to calculate solid angles?
can someone help with this question and how can i solve it please?
Is this from a test? If it is I am afraid we cant help if it isnt then for sure we can 😄
it is homework
not graded
thats why i want to know how to solve it
well first to determing bounderys you take 12-x^2 = x^2 -6 and solve that to get -3 and 3
so those are fine
then you basicly need to see what function is above the other
In this case one that has -x^2 will be above the one that have x^2 so area would be integral of (12-x^2)-(x^2-6) which is not equal to what you have
it is negative that
ro you can put apsolute value I think but thats not what you ahve there
thank you so much
mate you should put this in calculus section xD This is geometry mania here 😄
oh mb sorry
Again, does anyone know anything about calculating solid angle for a given three lines in space that interesects in 1 point? It would be of great help even a computer simulation since it is only for experimental purposes
Again, this is not place for this question xD My answer for only for surfaces not for volumes xD I dont remember the formulas for those I do mostly geometry and algebra very little calculus and even when I do this I need to refresh my memory a bit. And for rotation like this I think you cant use same logic
@shell raven if u know geometry
yea
i guess then you know why they are congruent
i can see that they are congruent
triangle ADE and EBC are congruents
no they are not
how to solv
intersection chords theorem / power of a point
ok
no
da fawk
how exactly are you applying the theorems i mentioned
doesn't angle DAE equal to angle EBC and angle ADB equal to angle ECB
doesn't angle DAE equal to angle EBC and angle ADB equal to angle ECB
yes
the triangles in question would be similar not congruent
do you know what these theorems state
intersection chords theorem / power of a point
and or are able to apply properties of similar triangles here
i have no idea
look up intersecting chords theorem
A times B = C times D?
what do A,B,C,D represent in that equation you've written
what will the equation look like
have you looked up
intersecting chords theorem
and if so can you post an ss of what you found
ok try applying that to your question
does A=9
lowercase a
no
please help me so i can go use the toilet after i finish
note that in the image you posted
a,b represent the segments of the same line (split at the point of the intersection)
yea i see
so if you're setting a to be 9,
what should your b be?
4?
yes
9 times 4 = 36
and then similarly what would the c and d be?
yes
so 36 = 4x square
yes
What’s the name of this shape?
trapezoid
How do I apply the area formula to it then?
What are the bases and what’s the height
do you know the left and right side are at right angles to the base?
Yes
well then you can split it up into a rectangle and triangle
or you can apply the general trapezoid forumla
What’s the height and what are the bases
consider this, your trapezoid is actually rotated 90 degrees
like the "height" is actually a horizontal line for you
since it's the left and right side that's parallel, instead of the top and bottom
yes
Thanks!
Can someone help me with a question pls
Thank u here is the paper ☝️
what exactly is the question you're having trouble with
3.3 and 3.4 pls
what part are you confused by, and what have you tried so far?
Ohk firstly i sovled the gradient 3.1 which is 4 over 3.2 i got confused bcuz it says "Hence write down the Gradient of BC so I said negative 3 over 4. Now i'm confused on how to find X of (x; 20)
bczu I'm using Midpoint formula and it ain't working
so you know the gradient of BC right?
but you can also find it using the 2 points B and C, so try writing that formula down and equating it to -3/4
Do u mean like this
Ohk so must I put them in they prime form them solve X
prime form?
im not familiar with that
I mean like this
do you know how to solve for x there?
I don't know
try multiplying both sides by (x-12) and isolating x
<@&286206848099549185> can U pls help me 3.3 and 3.4 pls
yes
$(x-12) \times\frac{-3}{4} = 20-17$
Ninja
is this what you meant
Yeah that's wht i mean apologise for writing it bad @keen nova
np, that is right btw
ohk cool, now how do i multiply the fraction in too the bracket
use the distributive property
Wht is that pls
$a(b+c) = ab+ac$
Ninja
Ninja
Ohk so i must first divide by 3 first, then take my whole sum and divide is by 4. then when i divide by 4 I'll divide both sides by 4 @keen nova
this is impossible to read
Any helpers in chat please?
A rectangle, its diagonals intersect at M, the length of its diagonal is 6 cm, then the length of the median AM is .....................
(a) 1 cm
(b) 2 cm
(c) 3 cm
(d) 4 cm
for everyone else's benefit
idk what's up with the typesetting and the wording, and the apparent choice not to mention that the rectangle itself is (probably) named ABCD
but if you draw a diagram it should be pretty obvious
Pretty much 
Its not named nah
I tried to but still
Thats pretty much all the info written
Hopefully you have at least a conjecture as to what the answer is
have you made a drawing?
Did you get the answer yet?
Can I give you a hand?
Do you know how to rotate a point around the origin?
hey just so you know the triangle is actually right-angled as well as isosceles so just computing one side length gives the answer directly
This is on the right track, but the negatives are wrong
Originally it is in the second quadrant
Moving it clockwise 90 degrees would move it to the 1st quadrant
Where both the points would be positive
Now that you have these points, do you know the formula for the area of a triangle?
Those are both correct
Does that make sense?
Have you guys gone over the Pythagorean theorem?
It is
Have you drawn down the triangle yet?
eh, I’ll do it
So there is the triangle, and I drew two other sides with what we know from the points
The hypotenuse of each of those triangles on the right should equal each of the sides
Yes
But a 2:1 ratio
To make it easier to see
Do you have it from here?
P is the original point
When you move the original point
You add a ‘ to the end of it
And you say prime
So the points are p and p prime
P is the original
Yep
Not new
Just another point stemming off of it
Yeah
New works
Sorry
So, those are the points
Because we have the points
We can figure out the lengths of sides from them
As from the photo I sent
We know that point p prime is 4 to the right and two up, forming a right triangle
With this, if we do the Pythagorean theorem
And we find the hypotenuse of the line from the origin to (4,3) is 5
Meaning that side of the triangle is 5
And you can do that with the other side
And see that that one is 5
So you have a triangle with the height 5 and with the base of 5
Using this
Of the pink triangle?
Or the pencil colored
To get the area, you have to get the base and the height
It’s half a square
Because we know all the points of the triangle
Or rectangle
Square
I mean, this one is
But, to get the base and the heigh, those are just two of the lengths of the sides
Because we know that we have the point (4,3)
We know it’s 4 along the x axis, and 3 up the way axis
And if we make a triangle out of this, we know it’s a right triangle
With the other side being the line between the origin and p’, and it is also the hypotenuse
Do the Pythagorean theorem, with the sides 3 and 4
3^2+4^2=25
Square root of 25= five
Do that for both, and you have the base and the height
How do I simplify this expression by hand?
In previous questions, I used the identity of inverse functions that f(f^-1(x)) = x.. but I am not sure what to do now 😦
There is an identity for cos(2x) that will reduce it to the form cos(x)
Might be helpful
Yeah.. I thought of that but idk how we would use it in this case because the three different forms look messy after trying it out
👍
Looks right
Here is an interesting question. If we are given 3 points in space is there any geometric interpretation of point which coordinates are sum of absolute value of coordinates of 3 given points where you can posibly add minus somewhere in front of the result. Like (2,-2,-2) (-3,3,-3) and (-4,-4,4) and we get point lets say (-9,-9,-9)?
Could you rephrase the question?
the work is not correct
the notation in the first two lines has mistakes and notation issues
and it is unclear how you were able to reach the conclusion in the final line
is this the proper place to ask for help in descriptive geometry?
in case the answer is no does anyone know where I can get help
Are these two expressions equivalent?
can anyone help me really fast ?
depends on if you have a question to ask
how do you solve for an angle normally?
what do you mean
Inheritanc-e ♦
?
help someone
do you still need help with this?
nope but i need help with this tho
and which part of this do you need help with?
do i understand correctly that the instruction "Make your own example of an if-then statement" is beyond your comprehension?
@velvet knot
yea
@velvet knot do you know what an if-then statement is?
yup
okay then why are you unable to make your own example of one?
can anyone help me with this? (find value of x angles
whts tan45
x=70 degree cuz alternate interior angles???
idk
1 i think
nope
help
do you still need help with this?
recall, what is a linear function?
idk
yes
ok, in simple terms linear function is a function whose degree is 0 or 1
its a pentagon, what would be the sum of its angles?
540 degrees
HELP
y=x
do not give out answers.
heh why ?
there's this thing called #❓how-to-get-help that you might want to have given a read when you first joined this server.
and if you haven't, now is a good time to read it.
Also don't be an ass
Don't go to a help channel and be an ass to people who need help
To find the answer you need you have to find an equation that when you input 0 for x you get 0 for y
Since the origin is at (0,0)
someone help me as soon as possible PLEASE <@&286206848099549185>
looks like a geometric inequality with disguised law of cosines
ill give it a try
,rotate
so let BP=b, AP=a, CP=c
let angle APB=60 and angle CPA =60
then by law of cosines, AB=sqrt(a^2+b^2-2ab*cos(60))
so AB =sqrt(a^2-ab+b^2)
similarly AC= sqrt(a^2-ac+c^2)
now use law of cosines on triangle BPC with angle P
BC=sqrt(b^2-2bc(cos(120))+c^2)
what does it mean when u write equality when a is on line bc?
because a isn't on line bc
BC=sqrtb^2+bc+c^2)
the only way to get BA+AC=BC is if the point A is on the line BC
lemme draw it
Can someone help with this question, I tried using the formula arctan(m) = theta (where m is the gradient and theta is the acute angle with x-axis)?
so AP is just the length of the angle bisector of triangle BPC
using a form of stewart's theorem we can get a relationship between a b and c in the equality case
where we get from the second to last step to the last step because the problem says a,b,c are positive reals
@true wave
so for this one do you see why it's arctan(2)-arctan(1/3)?
from there it's just simplifying it
arctan(2)-arctan(1/3)=x
tan( arctan(2)-arctan(1/3) ) = tan(x)
use tangent subtraction formula on left hand side
you get 1=tanx
so x=pi/4
Ohh yeah I got to the arctan(2) - arctan(1/3) part, I was just stuck from there
thanks!!
Is this polygon convex?
hey all !
so I've been studying maths on and off for a couple of years
and I'm trying to fully cover geometry and trigonometry
I've been using Khan Academy to help me but
I'm completely stuck on Congruence
specifically doing proofs
I'm trying to find something else that covers this stuff, but having a rough time
would someone be able to point me in the right direction ?
@tight tide do you have a specific question 
nope, self studying
ok well uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
use paul's online notes
for learning pre-calc
it covers trig if you want
¯_(ツ)_/¯
@past geyser ok is brilliant any better ?
Brilliant is really good but you need to pay
Help
what is zr supposed to be
Plz I need help
place the degree between G and C
What type of curve is this?
<@&286206848099549185>
Can someone help me to proof PX/XQ = - PY/YQ with menelaus theorm
my lecture need another answer and using another triangle (not using triangle PQC)
<@&286206848099549185> need a help ASAP :((((
Excuse me, sorry for interuption :"
Anyone can help me?
Shortest distance with the constraint that it has to touch some lines along the journey, these problems usually have you use reflections to deal with the constraints and the fact that shortest distance between two points is a line
Lemme try it
,rotate
This takes care of part a and b
For part C note that P is closer to line S than it is to line T
Let a= perperdicular distance from P to line S, b=vertical distance between P and R, and c=perpendicular distance from R to line T
,rotate
The path from P to R'''' is the same as the shortest path from P to R that touches line t first, then line s, then point P
And notice there's more vertical distance between P and R'''' than there is between P and R''
So for part C the shortest path going from P to R touching line s and then t is shorter than the shortest path going from P to R touching line t and then line s
help? I don’t get 9x or 6x
what do you mean by "don't get"?
Thank you so much, helped me a lot
Help
@lone sandal do you still need help with this?
Can I help them
no
Wait nvm school ending
can someone help me pls
@vast rover start by listing your knowns. We know x (side AB) and we know theta. Then list what we need to know (BC). We need to find something that uses our knowns and can be solved for our unknown. Since it's a triangle (particularly a right triangle) perhaps a trig function may be helpful. You know of any that may be of particular use here?
Can someone explain each one with the answer please
ok
$tan\theta=\dfrac{x}{BC}$
$\ tan39^{\circ}=\dfrac{7.9}{BC}$
$\ BC=\dfrac{7.9}{tan39^{\circ}}$
thatsouris
.
you should read up more on the trig ratios
khan academy provides great learning resources for them
Has anybody here ever read 'Euclid elements' and how did it feel after making it through chapter 1?
does anyone think they could give me sentences explaining how E and F are solved pls
Wow where did you get this questions?
my teacher assigned
All they are asking is if those conditions can form 1 (unique) triangle, the triangle is impossible (no triangle) or there are more than 1 triangles that satisfy that statement.
Do you get it from there?
i know how to solve it i just need someone to write me sentences because i am having trouble for E and F just explaining how to solve them
To form a triangle from three side lengths, the sum of any two side lengths must be greater than the third.
Let us call the above prop 22. This means that if you want to form a triangle from lengths A, B, C then
A + B > C
A + C > B
B + C > A
And if your lengths do not satisfy these then forming a triangle is impossible. That is it will form 0 triangles and if it does satisfy this then it will form a unique, 1 triangle.
You can check f to see if 7 + 8 > 12 and so on and you know what this implies.
It is F
ok should i write this all down ?
did u read it?
yes
i just need a few or 1 sentence for E and F explaining how they are solved because i cannot seem to put the correct words together to make a sentence that makes sense
because everything i write is not making total sense so i need help
ok
give me a few seconds i have to pull the page back up
if you do 7+8 is equal to 15 and 15 is larger than 12cm and that leads it to being a unique triangle
i just dont feel this is right
or i am not using the proper wording
i meant 7=8
btw
7+8
U are not checking one condition, three actually
It will form a unique triangle
i mentioned that in the last bit
From the picture u are given an option
Right?
So which do you think?
unique
i know the answers i just need sentences explaining how you find the answers
i just cant seem to put the right words together and make a sentence that sounds correct and is correct
@violet horizon
Like a proof?
Give me a sec
ok
Let ABC be a 🔼 such that AB = 7, BC = 8, AC = 12 and let DEF be another 🔼 such that DE = 7, EF = 8, DF = 12 (try to sketch the 🔼 to see the idea).
Now we see that the assuming that the lines AB, BC and CA are unique ( Have you heard of two different or unequal straight lines joining the same points?), we have that AB is the same as DE, BC as EF and AC as DF, it follows that 🔼ABC = 🔼DEF as they coincide and 🔼 ABC is unique.
Generally any triangle constructed from three give side lengths is unique.
@hot cove
ok this sentence is much better than mine do you mind if i use it?
@violet horizon
as well with E would you mind helping me with that
No problem
ok
do u mind helping me with E as well you made this very clear on what i was to do with F
Not exactly sure of what a non included angle means
here hold on i will get you a definition
A triangle drawn under the condition of two sides and a non-included angle is often thought of as a condition that does not determine a unique triangle.
i believe this is a non included angle
does this help a little
@violet horizon
Then you already have a sentence
that is the definition of non included angle
How many sides are we given in E?
A triangle with 8cm and 9cm side lengths and a non-included 70∘ angle will form
thats the question
Since it does not determine a unique triangle that means that it will determine more than 1 (Note that the definition above implies that at least one triangle is possible)
ok thank you that is what i should write down?
You are sure of the definition you wrote. right?
yes
Write it
Does anyone know any book that has some formulas on solid angles for tetraheedron?
Still seeking?
Yes, i found ways to calculate but still would be good to have book to read when i neeed some properties
Guys here is a curious question. Does inversion exsist in 3D? If yes does anyone can direct me to some book or article where I can see how it works?
- "Measurement" by Paul Lockhart
- "Euclid's Element of Geometry" by Euclid(300 BCE)
Book (Chapter) 13 of [2] above speaks precisely about the platonic solids: cubes, tetrahedron, octahedron, icosahedron and the dodecahedron but to understand it you might need results from previous chapters. [1] can be used as a modern alternative, since [2] is just facts and proofs.
What do you mean by inversion?
Thanks for this
And by inversion I mean inversion as hmm what is it called in english xDD Like central symetry, translation, homotethy or whatever it is called there is also "inversion" as transformation over a circle in plane. Can that be done in 3D
It surely can be done, although I don't understand the idea behind those geometry done using algebraic structures as groups
hi
i am struggling SO HARD with verifying & simplifying trigonometric expressions using identities
does anyone have any tips/helpful vids? i literally cannot comprehend it
Are there times you think something is valid but it isn’t? Or that you aren’t sure whether something is valid?
@lofty stream
yup
literally 90% of the time
i find it extremely difficult because there are no rules set when it comes to simplifying or verifying you just gotta apply the identities and do whatever
and my brain goes empty cuz idk what to do other than applying those identities
That may have to do with improperly learning things like variables, symbols, and functions in your past
yeah that’s true
whenever i ask my teacher for help he goes “just memorise the identities & you’ll know how to solve”
yet i still do not know how to solve ???
He didn’t think of what I said for some reason
Hmmm ok let me ask this
Have you read or heard the phrase “there exists a number x” or “for all numbers x”?
“True or false: For all real numbers x, x^2 >= 0”
yeah no
Yep that’s the heart of identities
And solving equations
You’re told the letter x represents a variable number
But you weren’t told the letter x literally means a number
yeah
A pronoun for a number, one might say
like honestly
i’ve completely forgotten how to factor, how to do distributive multiplication, how to cancel out like terms, like all basic algebra which i’m supposed to know
and it’s like really holding me back
So all those algebra things you mentioned are rules precisely because they’re rules of “generalized arithmetic”
Distributive property, let’s take a look
3(6+5) = 3*6 + 3*5
This familiar? Is it obvious?
yes
And it’s still true if I replace all instances of 3 with any number
Or all instances of 6 with any number
Or all instances of 5 with any number
So I can express that by using letters with each one representing a number
a(b+c) = ab + ac
for all real numbers a, b, and c
I think you typoed
Both distributing and not distributing are valid
You’re meant to try both and explore both options
Solving a problem is not a linear process
So for distributing
Do you notice an a(b+c) pattern
If so you can replace it with ab + ac
There’s also replacing every weird function like sec x with its definition
In fact, always do that tbh
that i know
ok example
cotx (cotx + tanx) = csc^2x
distribute first step?
Whoa is that an equation to solve or an identity?
equation to solve 😃
Don’t be afraid to distribute
i have to verify that the left side is equal to the right
You just contradicted yourself…
noooo how
ok wait i’m sorry LMFAO
its
verify that cotx (cotx + tanx) = csc^2x is an identity
There’s 2 things to try at the outset
Try them both, don’t freeze
Just because the official solution gives one way doesn’t mean another way isn’t valid
okay okay thank you
try reducing what you are trying to verify into sines and cosines
I think i know how to do the first one
the vertex is (-b/2a, P(-b/2a))
you know the latter equals 8
Ik nothing lmao -
Okay Ik that
plug in and see what that yields
another thing you know is that b must be negative
because -b/2a = 8 & the func has a min so a>0
you can also plug in 2(a² + 5a + 2) in for b
if I would say that function like f(x) = x * sin x is not a periodic function but instead has a periodically behaving element, would that be accurate?
what's a "periodically behaving element"
sin x
no, that's not what i am asking
i'm asking you to give a definition of "<function> has a periodically-behaving element"
umm let's see 😄 a function that, across its period, produces a pattern of values that is repeated identically across subsequent periods
english is not my native language so pardon any weird terminology
yeah, but wouldn't multiplication with x cause that function to uhh... lose its periodicity?
yes exactly
x sin(x) is not periodic
you have not clarified what you meant by "has a periodically behaving element"
hmm the more I think about my initial question, the more nonsensical it starts to sound even to me
Hey, I did this exercise a while back, and solved it
but I wondered, is there any actual reason why this is true for a hyperbola? Does $2\sqrt2|x-y|$ have any sort of physical meaning here? It seems like there must be some more satsifying reason why the inequality holds.
tim_e
<@&268886789983436800> can you please help me with this?
please don't ping mods for help with math problems
ohh ook sorry
who should i ping?
These will help you 🙂
Is anybody really good with hyperbolas?
I’m sure plenty of us can help you 🙂 what is your question?
Also thank you for the kind words
Study
Hey I have an Algebra II/Trig honors quiz tomorrow and was seeing if anyone could give me some advice/pointers
do some practice quizes (under test conditions) to help identify your knowledge gaps
where can i find exercises like this
How to solve 7 b
Please help me with this i've been struggling to find the answer
Is someone good with applications of trig derivatives?
I request assistance with Law of consine, particularly the arccos aspect of it
what's your issue with arccos
,rotate
Hi can someone help with this question..
Tbh I got the answer which is that it is -8/5, but I used a dodgy method (I used the Sum-to-product formulae and used the fact that sin(x-y) = -4/5 and rewrote tan(x)cot(y) = 3 as 2sin(x)cos(y) / 2 cos(x)sin(y) = 3. After that using sum to product formula for sine, I algebraically manipulated to get sin(x+y). It would be great if someone can quickly go through this (I'm not sure if there was anything in this case that I am not allowed to do)
Thanks!
if theres 47 liters per m^2 water in a 1m^3 volume cube is the height of water 4.7 cm?
Witchcraft
agreed
which is square root of 4225
65
which is 65
here
<@&286206848099549185>
Uh which grade is this
9th?
And what is it called I'll look it up see if I remeber
9th but im in math 2
congruent figures
stuff like that
oh kk
Have you gotten the answer to your question?
pls someone help
yes
its 35
i just dont know why
im trying to figure out why its 35
but idk
How did you get 35
Ok
Do you know that the sum of angles in a quadrilateral is 360 degrees?
Look again
Is this not the question
its just asking for the value of x
LMNP congruent to QRST is just the given information
so ye
?
Q1 is QRST
ok
Q2 is LMNP
alr
So Q1 is congruent to Q2
yep
Now both q1 and q2 have 4 sides and a rule is that the sum of angles in both will be 360 degrees
how
they both have 3 side
s
look
1 2 3
so shouldn't the sum be 180?
cause its a triangle sum
but when i solved it by using corresponding congruent parts
i did
$5x+3x+x+45=180$
Fire FTW
so therefore
LN and QS are not straight lines. Check again
Fire FTW
they are congruent figures
its already been stated
QRST is just a slightly turned triangle of LMNP
Fire FTW
so like
thats not gonna work but thats the only way i could think of it
cause its 180
Why do u think it is 35
i honestly don't know
If u got 15
Let us keep all the math aside, is the figure a triangle or a quadrilateral and I need just one answer
triangle, sir
Now if it is a triangle, why would it have four distinct points
because they just added
a 4th point
in the middle
for some reason idk why man
maybe you are right i guess
but i thought like it has 3 sides in total
so like
yea
oh waittt
you are right lmao
im so stupid
srry man
ty
i got it now
why its 35
i just did
$5x + 3x + x + 45 = 360$
ok thx
Fire FTW
@violet horizon ty
Happy to help
👍
yes
Thank you
can someone help me prove this equation
mhhh
hello can someone explain the last part to this please, I got two values x = -1 and x= -9, but the solutions say that I need to reject x = -9 since the domain is only from [-3,3]
where do they get domain restriction from?
(Also if you need the solutions just ping and I can send too)
I think it has to do with the domain restriction at the very beginning
From which you can show x is restricted to [-3,3]
hey @upper merlin i am unable to find the answer of that ques.....
i got the inradius of ABC as r=d-89 where r is radius and d is altitude , now i am unable to proceed
wait we can use similarity in that question and use their inradius to find the ratio between the sides of the triangle ABD and ACD
I didn't notice this at that time
cuz inradius would be proportional to the sides of the right angled triangle
ok
yes the ratio of AC:BA = 56:33
then what to do?
you can find BD in terms of d and subsequently AB too
after that it's trivial to find d
ok i'll try
hello, if i was trying to find the longest line u could fit in a regular pentagon would it be like this?
You could fit a longer curvy line
I mean a straight line
yes
ok thanks 🙂
does a + b > c work on a right triangle to determine if 3 lengths work
Assuming c is the longest side, yes
no assumption is needed
i got all the sides in the form for altitude d but unable to calculate it
i one of the steps d cancels on both the sides of the equation
use that inradius formula in any of the triangles
ok plz wait for 2 min
i got the d as 77 plz confirm
I got something else
154
yes the ans is 154 only
you got the complete solution now right?
the funny part is that the square of the inradius of the big triangle is the sum of the square of the inradius of the smaller ones
I am curious if this is the case for all right angle triangles
it actually is 
Can someone help me solve this? Idk what “a” is, it says the solution is -7/24 but idk where that came from.
Idk what a is
you can solve for it
by knowing that P lies on the unit circle
thus (4a)^2 + (3a-1)^2 = 1
Oh you’re right! I completely overlooked the fact that that would be radius
i find it from tanjant rate for tranform the equation to one variable but we have to know value of log3^2. can u find it from another way that we dont have to use logarithmic scale
they ask length of DB
and c corner is on the top of this triangle
I believe I have Figured out the Trisectrix, and, as proof, I have constructed a Regular Enneagon using only Compass & Straightedge equivalent methods.
and are we supposed to instantly understand every detail of your construction from this big unlabeled mess of circles?
I may need help with laying out the directions, But I promise that I can walk people through how to do it. just give me a moment.
we have pretty good proofs that this is impossible, so your construction probably has a mistake somewhre
those red segments look like they form a regular pentagram. is that the case?
yeah. I tried with a regular pentagon, seeing as it's an already exisiting example of three equal angles, but the positioning was wrong, so i used the length between the intersection of a circle centered on the corner of the angle and the angle itself to construct a regular pentagram with Euclid's method of finding the Golden ratio with the given length.
so, you started with a line segment (black) and made an equilateral triangle with it as one of its sides (orange)
then you made a circle centered at the apex of said triangle with radius equal to the triangle's side length
do i follow you correctly thus far?
just answer yes or no. do not try to explain anything further.
more or less


