#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 360 of 1
needs clarification
i mean it could be the wrong triangle sets
i think it was referring to pairs PXY'-PX'Y and PY'X-PYX'
that's speculation though
help please (ping when you answer)
Triangles have an order
You need to understand it yourself, we’re only here to give you a fraction of the solution.
And by the way as a step, sketch it and show your progress
im not sure if the double marks are right
im just not really sure how to prove how the internal angle bisector of BAC is perpendicular to AD
the way I'd do it is represent the points in the complex plane with $z(\theta) = ae^{i \theta}+b e^{i \theta}$ but I think then solving for the real numbers a,b would again boil down to linear algebra, but I think you really only need 2 points not counting the origin
Merosity
I guess that's pretty much exactly what you didn't want
well I said 2 points not counting the origin
still 3 points
oh typo, missed a negative sign $z(\theta) = ae^{i \theta}+b e^{-i \theta}$
Merosity
with 4 points maybe we can do something like draw a quadrilateral and some diagonals or something lol
that's the same as the exponential thing I wrote
if you expand the e^{ix}=cosx+isinx parts and recombine
a+b is the radius of the green circle, a-b is the radius of the blue circle
You can use equations of lines to find it
Wlog suppose you’re at the origin
Given the 4 points ABCD, consider the equation given by (AB)(CD) and the equation given by (BC)(DA)
The notation means find the lines and then multiply their equations
Then you know the ellipse is a linear combination of those lines
But you know it’s the linear combination with no linear terms as it’s centred at the origin
does anyone here have a geometry final exam study guide? my finals are tmr and my teachers forgot to add one
Can someone tutor me geometry?
If I'm given the formula, "r = 2" and I wanted to find all possible values of x when y is 0 or 1, how would I do that... you know since it's a circle?
the equation of the circle centered at origin is given by x^2+y^2=r^2
use this to find 'x' since you already know 'y' and 'r'
Alright, thank you!
Hi is anyone here good with chapter 3 (parallel and perpendicular lines) for geometry bc I have an upcoming test n I’m struggling
What do you want to know,@blissful bay
Like I have trouble finding angles and differentiating between interior, consecutive, and all those other angles
Like angles that are on the same side of the transversal
Like there’s a bunch of examples that I just can’t seem to understand
Yeah ik that but ty
What do you not understand about them?
like I can’t differentiate between them
So tell me about this picture.
Do you know what interior means?
It means the two angles are BOTH between the parallel lines. (It is like the parallel lines are protecting them)
A pair of exterior means neither angle is inside the parallel lines.
c, d, e, and f are all interior.
a, b, g, h are all exterior.
Alternate signifies two angles are on opposite sides of the transversal.
a, c, e, g are all on the same side.
b, d, f, and h are all on the same side as well.
Um, if you can’t read and understand the exam questions I dunno how you are gonna get an A.
That’s great for you but I am guessing noob is wanting to do well 😛
Take a calculus exam without knowing ‘ means derivative …
Fine without knowing what limit or lim means.
Nope. It is a definition silly.
Lol there are various definitions of a limit. 😛
Lim x —> infinity
The transversal is highlighted.
-a is congruent to d since they t vertical angles
-c is congruent to b because they are vertical angles
E is congruent to h because they r vertical
- g and h are consecutive angles because they add up 180
applying it to actual problems
,rotate
Like this one when I look @ it my mind goes blank
pls help me out in this -_-
IGCSE huh?
ya
thts why i dont like math
y = 52, because x = 128 and TPO = 90, then according to the 3rd teorem TQO=90.Then 360-128-90-90 (because it is a quadrilateral) you get y=52
thanks bro :)
x = 128, w = 26, y =52
ok
Or just be the ultimate mathematician and just hate geometry
screw tht gonna just drop math :D
but for now i gotta suffer
this channel shall be helpful for the long term
help
how would you guys solve this? :0
also the answer needs to be exact
like ik how one half, rad three over two, and rad two over two works
but wtf is this
note that sec(sin^-1(x)) = 1/cos(sin^-1(x)) = 1/sqrt(1-sin^2(sin^-1(x)) = 1/sqrt(1-x^2)
so there I've used sin^2+cos^2=1, but you could also derive it from using triangles
and that holds for any -1<=x<=1
np!
Imagine dropping something
Can't help but notice that if f(x) = arcsin(x), then d/dx f(x) = sec(f(x))
How?
Nice spot! So arcsinx is the unique solution to the ODE dy/dx=sec(y), y(0)=0
I cannot think of a nice deep explanation why that’s the case though
I mean you could also think of it like f(x)=arcsinx => sin(f(x))=x => f’(x) cos(f(x))=1
Which is kinda cute
I would definitely be happier that way
any tips on how to find the solution set for x?
I agree, without information on the pairs of equal length sides i don't think you can get a unique set of solutions
Sounds good - makes sense to me 🙂
Appreciate that
Can anyone help me with this pls!! With proper explanation
you can plug in $a \sec \theta$ directly to the other formula where $(a \sec \theta)^2$ appears to get $(1-b \tan \theta)^2 = 5+b^2 \tan^2 \theta$
Merosity
then keep playing with it and hope you can cancel things out
How come
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
can someone confirm i did this correctly
I did it till here and almost got the answer
As I said before The answer is a^2b^2+4a^2=ab^2
But it got 9b^2 instead of ab^2 on the LHS
Can you please tell me where I’m going wrong … it would mean a lot
You made a mistake when subtracting the two equations here
You should get 6 - 2b tan theta = 0
Wait...
Nvm
R you sureee I don’t think it works like that
Tats what the answer key said and I’m confused
I think wht I’ve done is correct ryt??
And theta is also eliminated!!
Yeah pretty sure it's wrong
Ok then !!!
Thanks anyways
the answer key has a 9. It's not an a, it's a 9.
it's just poorly written.
also I'm not sure about the specifics, but that relation satisfies a^2 sec^2 = (1 - btan)^2 && a^2sec^2 = 5 + b^2tan^2. It does not necessarily satisfy asec = 1 - btan && second equation. Could anyone confirm this?
for example, if I had x = y and you squared it, you will get the relation |x| = |y|, which is wrong because that would mean x = -y is a solution.
find the number of solutions of cos(cos(x))=x/10
Is there a simple way to see this without plotting arccos(x/10)?
this topic is graphs but didnt know where to put it, so i thought here, anyway just a simple question: how come:
2x^2 (where x is -3) = 18 and (when x is 3) is also 18
i thought 2x-3^2 = -18?
(and they same goes for -2 and -1)
wdym? When x=-3, 2x^2=18
doesnt 2 x -3^2 = -18?
no 2×(-3)^2=2×(-3)×(-3)=18
oh so i put whatever x is in brackets
Yes
thanks
Oh ok thanks for confirming!
i dont know if this is where you put this but I need help on this
what can you say about UY and SY.
or XS and XT.
hm
3-ABCD square
DEC right triangle
it asks the value of x
6-ABC is a triangle
it asks the value of x
5-ABC is a triangle
it asks the value of x
i need help 😬
@low estuary are you still looking for help?
yess
okay, so let's look at our square at the top, are you able to maybe draw 2 new right triangles (by tracing new lines) considering we know that DE is 8 and CE is 2?
give it some minutes of attempts, these 2 triangles will help us solve for x
i tried to do the same thing too many times
but i am not good at geometry, i am trying to be, so i couldnt do it
it's okay.
so let's look at our point E, it's going to important, we can trace a horizontal line that meets E, so that it creates 2 new triangles
can you try drawing this triangles in your paper? so that i can see what you are doing
great but extend the horizontal onto the other side, so that it touches the right side
now you have those 2 upper triangles, CEZ (Z is just the intersection between that horizontal that we drew and the right side of the square) and DEX (X is just the intersection between that horizontal that we drew and the left side of the square)
can you see those 2 triangles?
yess
okay great, now if we label the side DX to be z, can you guess what CZ will be as well?
great. now for the whole side of ZX, the whole horizontal, if we know that ZX is 2sqrt(17) as you well figured out, and if we call maybe EX to be just y, can you guess what EZ will be?
2sqrt(17)-y
great job.
so now we have 2 right triangles, with 2 variables, z and y, can you try solving for them by creating a system of 2 eqns?
yeah no, i'd rather not to, seeking a solution won't help you as much as you yourself solving it with your intuition as we are doing right now.
so unless you want to wait if someone else "gives away the full solution", we can continue the problem
okay the equations were made correct, the issue is that you did $(a-b)²=a²-b²$ which isn't correct.
Al𝟛dium
remember that $(a-b)²=a²{\color{green}{-2ab}}+b²$
Al𝟛dium
so instead, you should have $\ \begin{cases}\overbrace{({\color{green}{68}}-{\color{blue}{y}})²}^{({\color{green}{a}}-{\color{blue}{b}})²={\color{green}{a}}²-2{\color{green}{a}}{\color{blue}{b}}+{\color{blue}{b}}²}+z²=2²\ y²+z²=8\end{cases}$
Al𝟛dium
now try redoing this system of eqns to solve for z and y.
ohhh
i just did all of them again
and i found out that x equals 10!!!
thank you so much
can you also take a look at other questions?
i'd be pleased if you do 
Sorry may I comment on problem 3?
You can drop the perpendicular to DC from E.
Call the length there h. Area = 0.5h(2rt(17)) = 0.5(2)(8). So we can find h.
Base of h to D is Pythagorean using h and 8. Call it r.
Then x is a Pythagorean with r and 2rt(17) - h.
Just wondering how others would address this question, I can't seem to find the "Correct" answer though I have about 5 different ones haha.
Thanks.
Show your attempt
I would draw vectors, break them into components, add up the components then find the magnitude and angle
complex numbers
There is a whole lot of crazy on this page. Be warned.
A had a whole nother page of crazy but I scribbled htem all out so that when i solve it, I don't think that those were the possible answers haha.
I actually haven't learned about vectors yet haha.
Oh 
That's something we get to this semester haha.
But in you saying that means i'm going to go look up vectors and figure out how to use them for this question. Which is helpful in and of itself.
Can you draw one single picture? Start with a starting point, then draw an arrow to indicate moving 20 paces south, then where that arrow ends, draw an arrow to indicate the next movement, etc.
Until you are done.
Then draw an arrow from the starting point to the tip of the final arrow.
The length of that arrow and its direction is what you are after.
Yeah, that's the conclusion I ended up coming to, but using my limited knowledge of trigonometry, sin, cos, tan, their inverses and trigonometric value. I wasn't able to conclude how I would solve for x or the degree as the result isn't a triangle, unless manipulated in some way.
Which I'm assuming means I can use vectors to solve it? Thanks again @livid moss
Yeah
If you don't formally know vectors, you would still basically do the same thing just except without calling it vectors
Here is a picture. I took each arrow and split it into a triangle with a vertical and a horizontal side
Then the vertical side of your final arrow, is just adding up or subtracting the lengths of the vertical sides of your other triangles.
So you go down 20 paces, then with the next arrow you go down ? paces, and then you go back up ?? paces
oh beautiful, i see it now.
Then you can do the same thing for the horizontal sides
I didn't split the first arrow into a triangle since it's just straight down so its effect is obvious
Thank you so much hahaha. I was so close to it earlier, I had the bottom right, right angle and instead of 2 of the left top portion, I had 1 that spanned the whole left side. But that doesn't work because the angles were different.
Glad I could help. Ask if you get stuck using this method.
Will do, thanks again! I was super nervous about asking the question as I have stewed on it for a very long time hahaha. Built it up, ya know?
Aww, don't be nervous to ask for help. But it's good to try first as much as you can. Sometimes you just can't do it unless you learn the method though.
Thanks again @livid moss I managed to get there in the end, it looks like something out of a scribble book but its correct haha.
@low estuary okay, are you still looking for help?
yes, for the 6th. the other one did i handle
Ok nerds I need help
How do I determine or how can I cut circle so that contact point always stays in center line?
I mean that it stays in center line when you rotate whole thing
hello, is anyone able to help me with this? thank you.
<@&286206848099549185>
wich one of those or in general
in general
So you probably learned congruence properties or whatever you call them like side angle side and stuff like that
yes
and you get every time a different set of given things
and you have to see if you can apply those
or if there is not enough information
do you understand or do I have to show the first one as an example?
@meager holly
ohh okay, can you give an example please?
sure so I'll show you how 4 goes and you try the rest
okay thank you
VincentBH
yes
yes
VincentBH
ohh okay
and you keep doing this
okay but im confused on the part of the theorem and postulate part
wait where are you confused
i understand the AAS part but im confused on what postulate and theorem to use
it says i have to write a theorem or postulate
are you confused by what the difference is between theorem and postulate?
no, im confused on what theorem or postulate i am supposed to use like vertical angle theorem or like segment addition postulate
1 sec
okay
basically you have to write any theorem or postulate you use
you only used AAS here, so that's what you gotta write down
oh okay
if you use smth else than you gotta say what you use
np gl with the others
okay thank you
how am i going to explain these two parts are congruent
theres no point there
ik that but idk how im going to show ABC and ABD are isosceles
theres no name for the point in the middle
Assume a name for the point yourself
that isnt allowed
Why not?
so far in the entire book every proof was done without assuming a points name on ur own
and they never taught that
$c = \frac{2}{\frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b}}$
$\frac{c}{a} + \frac{c}{b}$ = 2$
$\frac{c}{a} - 1 = 1 - \frac{c}{b}$
$\frac{c-a}{a} = \frac{b-c}{b}$
Y it no work
they never told me it was allowed so im going to assume its not allowed
if i do assume its allowed
thats a gamble
Imma just get a pen and paper and send. 😂 Well basically you can manipulate (c-a)/a = (b-c)/b to c = 2ab/a+b
Yup
Afaik, it is just another way of defining Harmonic Mean of 2 quantities
Oh. I see. You're confused over how they achieve that expression and not about why that's HM.
They used the property of similar triangles that the ratio of corresponding sides of similar triangles is proportional in this diagram
Yes I am writing it out, one moment please.
what edits should i make or am i fine
.
bruh
ok
im doing the indirect proof righ
right
they want me to do it like this
ok
would this work then
this is a direct proof btw
oh ok
i think i have to put that in
bc i cant think of any other reason
Sorry to keep you waiting, multiple ratios here are tripping me too. 🤦
hope this helps @upper karma
Most likely there's something easier which I am unable to see right now
this isn't geometry btw, it's closer to #probability-statistics
though it's pretty basic (compared to other topics in probability)
yeah so this is just applying the definition of expected value @opaque crater
how do I write the equation of the line BC to include the y-coordinate of the point C? I got the slope
You mean like point-slope form?
nvm I had it all wrong
is this correct
yup
yes
explain this somebody?
cos x = sqrt(1- sin^2 x)
sin x = sqrt(1- cos^2 x)
For 27 Just Apply Pythagoras Theorem
sin R = TS/RS
Find TS using Pythagoras Theorem
or u can find cos R using b&c and using sinx = sqrt(1- cos^2 x) convert it to sin
Can I get proofs that SAS, SSS, ASA and AAS are congruent triangles.
And SSA is not.
KhanAcademy proofs is not very good for that.
(ASS is not sufficient I think for congruence I believe anyway?)
Arc Length = 2 x pi x r (theta/360)
Theta is the angle Subtended by Arc of Arc Length
theta= l/r
Does anyone know like how to start this off? I don’t want the answer but I’m just confused as to how I would solve it
- outside angles theorem (for circle)
- properties of tangents + angle sums
Thank you!!
inside angles theorem (circle)
@fringe basin ask here
How do I rigidly transform the 1st figure into the 2nd one?
Or the 2nd one into the 1st one?
Ehhh anyone?
do you mean change the positions of vertices so they coincide?
if yes, then the first triangle should be positioned as def, the points d, e and f being positioned anticlockwise
What have you tried?
Wdym?
Have you attempted the problem / what ideas do you have
Feels less helpful just giving the answer
we don't give out answers here anyway
@upper karma are you here to learn or did you just want someone to do this for you?
I have the concept of doing and plus I already did that answer so no
And I can't find a pencil
yeah thought so, sweet
Hello
hi
yes
and i dont really got anyone to teach me
so what degrees do u have if u have a flat line
180
so see that 105 if u take that flat line how to u find the angle conected to it
uhm
d to c?
what is the missing angle
that flat line
ye
okay
dfc
missing
oh i think i get it
d to c is 180
f d c is 39
and f c d is 39
so dfc is missing?
ohhhhhhhh
so the mid angle is what you subtract from the straaight angle to separate the triangle
since is it a flat line
and u know 1 angle and u know that a flat line is 180
u substract that angle u know from 180
why 114-180?
because the 2 angles that we found out than we minus to find the j angle
isnt it 180 -114 because 180 is the sum of the angles of a triangle
yep
ok
the answer for this one would be 80 right?
because if 14 outer = 50 than the other side 14 is 50 as well, and the total angle is 180 so 180-100 = 80
@mystic coral
yep
ok ty
yo momma
so far, the I found the angles 47 and 90. Also, for b, the value I believe is 50. How would I determine the river width? Would I need to determine each side's length first?
i found c = 46.63 and a = 68.37
anyone there? i could really use your help. this is the only problem I have left.
is the river's width the actual question? is that what it's meant to be?
or the distance from A to B
the width of the river
the first sentence makes me think otherwise
I already solved for each distance between each point: C - A = 50, C - B = 68.37, and A - B = 46.63
how would the river's width affect any of the numbers given or calculated?
i mean sure if it exceeded them
but within the margins
I asssume it wouldn't, but I just want to know how wide the river is, I thought I would need to find the angles and sides first though.
it's not like you're given any info about the river
you'd need to know at least one more side of the river
you mean like in between A - B?
well the either the width itself, or the line segment of the hypotenuse that crosses the river
there's other grammar mistakes in the problem which is why i think it was miswritten
is there anything I could at least to get the one side of the river?
Can someone explain this to me please?
hey does anyone know how to solve this ? if so could u show how u solved it so i could understand ?
Do you know what a full rotation is in radians?
wdym turn into?
both sides of your initial equation were differentiated to get that result
both sides of your initial equation were differentiated to get that result
(using something like power rule)
look up differentiation (using power rule)
yes
<@&286206848099549185>
what theorem/property is this
well you can start by noting that the diameter of both spheres = 18cm
since if you put a line through the middle of the rectangle and cut it in half, it'll be the diameter of the circle
I am confident that this is the answer-
34.83 sq cm
Somebody correct me if I am wrong
Oh so it basically splits it in half so the radius is 4.5
Thank you!
Yea what he said
I think the rest is fairly simple?
Yupp thank you! I think u are correct, I got 34.77cm^2
perfect
Yeah I just had to do it on paper
Yep, I only went to 3.14 so you are right
thank u guys so much!
Np
my pleasure
is there a name for it? I just know they are parallel cause my teacher said so 😎
I think there is a theorem
I am going through his steps to see what he proved so far
I think that it’s either angle side angle or just transitive property
cuz the given has AE is congruent to AD
And then the statements are that the angles are similar. Which is why they are parallel
All A D C angles are congruent is basically what he said so far
with some additional angles
And since we can picture
well
Assuming that they are parallel
We can usesegment DC as a transversal I suppose
Well didnt they prove that both triangles are congruent
and we know that D and C are congruent
Cuz it’s an isosceles triangle
So if they proved that they are the same due to sas you can say that they r parallel through substitution/transitive property
^
You may be right
I am gonna check something though
aight bc I’m not 100% sure
For this what formula would I have to use?
Hm
Lets see
We know every segment length
My guess would be to make a lot of triangles
I am not that far into geometry tbh
no worries!
5x5x8.4
I appreciate your help
I think I may have got it
sec
so we got 2 triangles that are congruent there
each are about 23
hmmm
and then thats 4 triangles
so
92 for all triangles
then 100
and another 100
then a 30
85
Alright my best guess is
about 407
I honestly just messed around with sides and found the areas of them
I dont know the formula if there is one
but the again I am not far into geometry so dont take my answer as yours
very well may be wrong
Yeah same I’m mixing them up. But I think that what u have is close
Yea I know its probably close to the answer if not the answer, but I moved some things around that I don't know if I was allowed to
Bc it’s a worksheet with answers attached n I just cant seem to get the answer
Do you know the answer?
What is it
Right that’s what I’m thinking
for one part of it
that was
lemme check
nvm it was 102
well I can look at a formula
ill brb
add up the area of both trapezoids and the 4 rectangles
Thank u
Not sure but I’ll try again
can a rhombus be a rectangle
Depends on your definition of rhombus
But id say yes
Yes, I'm pretty sure it can.
For 14 which formula am I supposed to use bc I just don’t know what or how to start
try to see if you can decompose that shape into simpler shapes for which you know surface area formulas
D
Google formula for volume of a sphere
if you morph a triangle ionto a circle, at what point does it go from 180 degrees to 360... and why does it seem like 360 degrees if i imagine walking on a triangle path and using a compass?>
sounds like you're conflating interior and exterior angles
if i walk on the inside opf a circle its 360 right?
but your right, i would turn 180-60 degrees
for qual triangle
equal
if you're morphing a triangle into a circle, then I'm imagining you're blowing it up like a balloon or something
the angles are going to get larger as you do that
but those angles are not going to turn into the 360 degrees of rotation in a circle though, the 360 degrees is measured from standing at the center and rotating around
not the same as an angle measured from a vertex of a triangle
a circle doesn't even have any vertices to measure this way
im thinking of walking on a line
as you walk around a path and measure your change in angle, you'll get 360 for both yeah
thank you
yeah you're welcome
Hii! I need help..
In the attached figure, CH is the height of the equilateral triangle ABC, BP is to PC as 1 is to 2 and Q is the intersection of the lines AP and CH. The value of area of triangle AHQ / area of triangle ABC is
can anyone help??
what 2d shape will the crosssection of the solid look like through the plane of the diameter?
1:6 according to me, tho i simply didn't apply formula but the fact that nature loves symmetry, so i divided the whole triangle into 6 smaller triangles of equal area, now we know that area of an equilateral triangle is root3/4 a^2, where a is the side of the triangle and now as i said that i divided triangle ABC into 6 equal parts then the area of triangle AHQ world be 1/6th of the triangle ABC
i mean i just applied logic here
🥲
umm use the formula for frustum?!
,w 20 + 2sqrt(32^2-30^2)
,calc sqrt(32^2-30^2)
Result:
11.13552872566
how does one find the centre of a hole?
context?
I work with low cost machine vision systems. manufacturers want to detect drilled holes in plane wings
the problem is how do you approximate the centre of a hole to a high precision.
is the hole known to be circular?
thats the problem, the hole is never circular in practice, it is an ellipse mostly and always has outliers
yes
why not take the arithmetic mean of the green points then
this gives a centre that is prone to outliers
can you show an example with a lot of outliers
ya
this hole is at an angle, and the lighting is not optimal which confuses the camera
im think this, consider the contour of the hole,
if we draw a line between every point
then draw a perpendicular line towards the middle,
sounds kinda overcomplicated
if you can draw a line separating the big contour from the two small ones, you can just ignore points belonging to the two small ones
no no, these are not part of the contour of the hole
this is considered a different contour
in practice, I discard these, the focus is on the ellipse/circle in the middle
so why not take just the hole contour
if you discard them already
taking the mean should work fine
I'll try this way thanks
Thankss!! I did the same
ah no all cool XD
Heyyy
What would you call an area enclosed by 2 concentric arcs?
Found it, it's called an Annulus Sector
if you guys have a better name for it, lemme know
Alright
So for question 1)
@untold cosmos I'd like to know that you're still here btw
ye
im here
There are two ways you can do this.
you can use the Pythagorean theorem
or the distance formula.
Which one would you like me to use?
I think that the distance formula would be better.
ok
Since that's more applicable..
alright!
Would you be fine if i screenshare?
You don't ahve to talk.
ok
You can just join teh voicechat.
👍
ummmm
bruh we have like 2 vc
join this server
real quick
they have a lot of voice channels
@untold cosmos
UGH IM TERRIBLY SORRY!
MY DISCORD CRASHED
Join again @untold cosmos
(the vc)
Hello?
@untold cosmos
Are you there?
its ok
have you drawn it?
Its A?
No.
how is it not?
I can help!
first find the co-ordinates of the 3 initial points
then reflect them in the given line by swapping their x and y values
and then dilate them as given be leaving A' the same and finding the midpoint of P' and A' for P'' and the midpoint of L' and A' for L''
do you get why those are the steps?
its abit blurry so idk what the coordinates are 
for L i got (2,4) for A I got (-7,-1) and P i got (-4,7)
idk what to do after
tho
@quick cedar
i think P is (-3, 7)
so then what you do is to flip the points in the line x=y, we swap around the x and y values of every point
so L' (4,2) A' (-1, -7) and P' (7, -3)
ooo why do we switch the coordinates for geo
well if you think about flipping a point in the line x=y
youre drawing a line from that point to the line and then extending it by that same length
the two points need to be symmetric in the line
and as such (a, b) flipped in x=y is (b, a)
ooo
yeah that makes sense
i forgot how to do dilate by a scale factor so now coordinate geo is biting me in the ass
oh thats all good
well if you imagine something dilating by a factor of it
2
its getting twice as big, however point A' doesnt move
ah so the prime shape will still be within the original?
in some way yes. We are basically taking the triangle and making the sides twice as long
keeping the angles the same, and the position of A' the same
so we know that the midpoints of the sides of the new triangle will be the old triangle
ah so does only L' and P' change
yes!
huh
ok so if you think about it, P'' is twice as long as P'
but since the line hasnt moved, only gotten longer that means that if you find the midpoint of P'' and A'' it must be the old point of P, P'
ooo
knowing this, we want to find P'' so that MP''A'' is P'
and that L" so that ML"A"
yeah
(x1 + x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2
idk how it applies
to da question
because imagine a string from point a to b and its 2cm long. If you double its length and put one end on a then the middle of the string will be on point b, because now the string is 4cm long, so 2cm is the middle, and 2cm from a is where b is
so the same works for dilation
oooo
cant we just divide each cordinate by 2
or nah
no because A is not the origin
so you want to find the coordinates that make the midpoint of P" and A" = P'
and the same goes for L"
its a bit complex because instead of finding the midpoint of two points, you need to find the point which as a midpoint at a point we know already
wait let me send u the answer key fro the mock exam question im doing
ok lets just go from here. Do you get why we have these points here
ye because erm we had to shift
yep so want to find the point L" so that the midpoint of it with (-1, -7) is (4, 2)
try and find it
yeh tahts what im confused ab it
so uh 1.5,-2.5?
no you worked out the midpoint of A' and L'

we want the point so that M of L" and A" is L'
im a bit lost
ok so we have point (-1, -7) and point (4, 2) and we want to find the point such that the middle of our unknown point and (-1, -7) is (4, 2)
yep
yep
huhhh
well yeah but 9 is the x value, and -7 is the y value
alrrr
obviously the line is on a plane but in essence this is what we want
we have the points A and L and we want to find the point that has midpoint with A, at L
because we essentually stuck a pin in A, and pulled the line to be twice its lengt
huh 
ok so to dilate a line with factor 2 is to make it twice as long
yesh
and the question said we make it twice as long from vertex A meaning that point A does not move
so we double the length, extending the end of the line
notice that if we double the length of the line, the halfway point of the new line is the end of the old line
btw whats the distinction between '' and '
I kinda understand what u mean now oWO
im glad 🙂
AHH WAIT CAN U EXPLAIN WHY A ISNT CHANGED AGAIN
IM A BIT SLOW WITH GEO
SINCE I JUST STARTED TODAY HJKDEHED
its all good!
we are dilating the triangle at vertex A
so we are making the triangle bigger but where? it could be anywhere
so we double the triangle's side legnths, and keep point A where it is thats what it means to dilate from vertex A
OO THANK U
hey i need help
imagine you have a triangle ABC and you know all of its corner's coordinates and you also know X
you need to find the coordinates of F and G
given the distance between them. for example 5
any idea?
@grizzled oriole X is a vector?
if so then G would be the origin
F would be the unit of that vector * 5
Use Pythagorean Theorem to solve the triangle, then express sin(θ) as the ratio between the sides.
X isnt a vector its a point
and XG as a vector isn't perpendicular to BC
ok uh um

don't think you can do that
unless ab||fg at the minimum can be done
and/or like before if x vector
how do you get a^2 + b^2 = c^2 from this?
You mean how equality arises?
i got it
i had considered it only in terms of rhs and a^2 + b^2 = c^2 for some reason
disregarding the lhs
thanks
How is Triangle DAE Isosceles?
ABDE is a square.
So?
this is not true
DE=AE*
yeah sorry
Consider using the Law of Cosines for the top one, and Law of Sines for the bottom.
also @untold cosmos , your question isn't really appropriate for this channel. Your question is a probability/stats question and as such, should be in a probability/stats channel.
can someone tutor me geometry and algebra 2?
Is not this congruent by SSS?
you have posted a low-res picture, but it looks like GH and IJ are marked parallel
so it is not known whether or not they're congruent
@grizzled galleon because the reflection of (1,0) through the lines is ((1-m^2)/(1+m^2), 2m/(1+m^2) and the reflection of (0,1) is (2m/1+m^2, (m^2-1),1+m^2)
You reflect the basis vectors
So reflect (1,0) and that gives you the first column, and reflect (0,1) and that gives you the second column
@grizzled galleon u know about householder matrix?
if $a$ is a vector then reflection matrix along the hyperplane normal to $a$ is given by $$H_a = I -2\frac{aa^t}{a^ta}$
Ryuzaki
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
u just put (-m, 1) in place of a
Hey
I'm trying to create an object on a cricle with x distance from centre... actually I want to make 8 objects, each 45 deg away from each other, but I'm working on a function to do it... I'm very bad at it... can any1 help ? >
function >
for inx in range(0, 8):
light = rt.CoronaLight()
light.width = 2
light.height = 2
x = math.cos(inx) * 10
y = math.sin(inx) * 10
light.pos = rt.Point3(x, y, 50)
current result :
I also need to rotate them to face centre but thats another problem o.o
uu maybe inx is angle o.o
Multiply inx by pi/4
yeh was just test-printing it 😄
What library are you using?
oh, rt is 3ds max python stuff
ok, what about next problem, make each object face the centre o.o hmmm
That depends what way they are facing naturally
If they’re facing up, rotate by pi-inx I think
Or something like that
mmm, I think thats easier as I just use auler angles, so each angle is inx *(360/itemCount)
so I think thats ok, but I broke my 1st test now 😄
this >
inx = (math.pi/4) * (inx * 45)
why is math/pi/4?
math.pi/4
hmm
So an eighth is pi/4
so math.cos/sin wants radians ?
something like this
count = 8
degCount = 360/count
...
inx = math.radians(inx*degCount)```
count = 8
degCount = 360 / count
for inx in range(0, count):
light = rt.CoronaLight()
light.width = 2
light.height = 2
i = math.degrees(inx * degCount)
x = math.cos(i) * 10
y = math.sin(i) * 10
light.pos = rt.Point3(x, y, 50)
I broke something 😄
def makeCoronaLight():
count = 8
degCount = 360/count
for inx in range(0,count):
light = rt.CoronaLight()
light.width = 2
light.height = 2
light.rotation = rt.eulerAngles(90,inx*degCount,0)
i = math.degrees(inx*degCount)
x=math.cos(i) * 10
y=math.sin(i) * 10
light.pos = rt.Point3(x,y,50)
you have max?
or python/pyside2?
nah its big app
hours to install
do you have pyside2?
I can make gui app example easily
I have the libraries I just want to know what the imports look like
yeh im making it now
if u dont have max I have to build one using pyside
all good 2 mins
I have it
from PySide2.QtCore import *
from PySide2.QtGui import *
from PySide2.QtWidgets import *
import sys
import math
app = QApplication()
w = QWidget()
count = 8
degCount = 360 / count
for inx in range(0, count):
light = QLabel(str(inx),w)
light.setFixedWidth(10)
light.setFixedHeight(10)
i = math.degrees(inx * degCount)
x = math.cos(i) * 100+100
y = math.sin(i) * 100+100
light.move(x, y)
w.show()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
just resize the widget
woa hes jumping all over the place o.o
eee
I needed radians! 😄
taadaa 😄
danke!
dis amazing o.o
do you know wavy curve method of solving this kind of inequalities?
help?
Looks like (m\angle WTL=m\angle QTR), as they're opposite, such that (2\cdot(2x-1)=3x+7\Rightarrow 4x-2=3x+7\Rightarrow x=9). Then, (m\angle PTQ= m\angle LTS=5\cdot9+6=51^{\circ}).
SubGui
Does anyone know of a good source of trigonometric proof questions which start at around UK A level level and work their way up to stuff you would see in olympiads?
SL Loney perhaps
thanks, this looks good!
How did he do this?
there is a very thin gap spanning the diagonal in the 5×13 rectangle, and its area is precisely the missing unit
it's a parallelogram whose sides have slopes 5/2 and 8/3, which are deliberately made to look very close together
oh fr
just go ahead and ask ur question
been just ooking for some help si i can deal with trigonometry tho ..........
i just
well first when it comes to complex numbers
and write them under the trigonometrical forme .........
and when it comes to integrate well
things like arcsin and arccos
i quit face that a lot so ........
and m 13 btw
m james ..........
oh darn I don't really know for the complex number one, haven't really delved into it unfortunately
but wdym by integration arcsin and arccos? that should probably go in #calculus if you are talking about purely integrating those two trig functions
discord looks quit complicated tbh , it was just the fact that many people use it thta's why i , quit thought i can give it a try and well see how can i get some help
well there are some nice youtube videos that may be help navigating all of this, so that may be of help
how about equations that contain trigonometry functions tho
i really got serious troubles with that ........
like serious ones ........
means i can find out how to work it on youtube then
huh






