#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 358 of 1
ahh ok I see
thank you
@silk patio Thats ingenious how do people find these solutions to these problems?
Is there any logic behind it?
Yeah but it involves projective geometry
@silk patio Do you know what is logic behind that solution? How did someone come up with that?
I was trying to find solution on my own and it was too hard
Unless you know projective geometry it’s gonna take too long to explain it in an intuitive way
And I’m lazy
Yeah it’s hard
Can sm plzzz help me with this
can you tell me what the problem is saying?
I’m supposed to find how much ice cream he lost
Whenever you lose something, the total amount you have is reduced. What mathematical operation describes reduction?
@upper karma
can someone help? very beginner trig question but I'm a freshman doing some extra credit trig courses
@upper karma23° isn't 27°
also based on my calculations, h should be over 1000
can someone helpme
how did they get this first step that its 90 degrees?
@dark sparrow
???????????
im confuse how they got that first step
i mean the second sentence
angle ACB = angle CDB = 90 degrees
but how do they know its 90 degrees?
The question says "Triangle ABC is a right triangle"
the diagram implies that triangleABC is right triangle with a right angle at C
it is also given that CD perp AB
so are comparing two triangles?
which by definition means that <CDB is 90°
oh okay, but how do we prove that the pythogorean thm works?
thats where i get confuse
consider corresponding sides of similar triangles
and set up a few equations
got it ty
If ∠ B and ∠ Q are acute angles such that sin B = sin Q, then prove that ∠ B = ∠ Q.
How do i solve this?
If B and Q are acute angles, then they are in between 0˚ and 90˚
or 0 radians and π/2 radians
In this range for B and Q values, sin B and sin Q never repeat values
If B could be any real number, then there are multiple inputs that yield the same output (the outputs repeat)
Given this, if you know the value of sin B, then you only have 1 possibility for B
The same applies with sin Q and Q
For a less trig proof, consider a triangle with b and q as angles
As a result:
if sin B = sin Q, then B must be equal to Q, since there are no other possibilities for B or Q
I like this
Sine law tells us that triangle is isosceles and then done
If COS-1=(3/6) cause the hypotenuse is the longest
The rectangle with max area is a square
Are you sure about that because i remember solving it and don't remember it being a square
I am not xD
It's a square if it's a 45 45 90 triangle but just noticed that's prob not true for other right triangles
The rectangle of max area has half the area of the triangle that's for sure
is -ln(x+x) = ln(x-x)?
need help
have you learned SOH CAH TOA?
can it be said, that if two arc segments intersect that you can check the line intersections of the radial vectors coming from each end of the arcs? such as like this terrible drawing:
this is after a radius check from both circles aswell
because im surprisingly not finding an easy way to check if two arcs intersect each other
not really, because the radii when extended will always intersect
no matter if the arcs intersect each other
depends on how much you like geometry I guess
I read it and it’s not worth
Unless you’re interested in constructive geometry
Most of what people call Euclidean geometry isn’t that style anymore
Just do simple Olympiad problems and work up
yea
Is a rectangle-trihadral angle a trihedral angle with a dihedral of 90° or a trihedral with a 90° angle on one of its faces
Different sources give different answers
What is the most appropiate
looks like a special case of stewarts theorem
It’s even easier than that
It’s Archimedes theorem or whatever. Make it into a parallelogram and do it that way
Consider vectors a b. c=b-a
2m=a+b
Then dot product with itself and add
So these are the answers for the questions on my homework
but I thought you can't simplify x^2 and x? Like they're two completely different things?
x^2 is the product of x and x
This is Apollonius’s Theorem
It and the angle bisector theorem are both special cases of Stewart
I don't quite understand
because wouldn't the difference be 0 because it would be split into 4 congruent pieces?
they're asking you to consider all the possible ways to cut up your wood into 4 congruent rectangular pieces
and all the possible dimensions that can result
here are a few examples of cutting patterns
@stuck dragon
what do you mean
yeah, and you can use 10/6 = 6/c to find c in the same fashion
for the 19th question , join the center of the circle to the point of contact of the tangent and then as you know that the tangent to a circle is perpendicular to the radius , you'll have a right triangle ,now just use pythagoras theorem to get x
tan-sec
sec-sec
or more generally power of a point
Intersecting Chords Theorem
product of the 2 segments on the chord is constant
so mk is 17 and x= 0?
nah i was just asking for help
;-;
@humble pulsar did i solve that right ?
9th grade u sure cant help?
x=0, yes
how would i solve for mk then?
plug x=0 in...
Don't ask for help on tests.
my imagination got stuck on the last one so it was confusing
This is #chill -tier content. Don't meme in help channels.
@humble pulsar do you know how to solve these
Hey guys I got a question
what have you tried?
please ping after a minimum of 15min
and notice all of those three angles add up to 180
or those two unknown angles add up to 90
uh
and using this fact, u can get a linear equation
which u can solve to get x
now try to do it
ok
If AB and CD are parallel diamaters of 2 bases of a cylinder with height H and the point E splits AB into a ratio of 1:2.Find the volume of the cylinder if line through E and D makes a 45° angle with the base of the cylinder
I did it like this and hgot the wrong answer
It should be H^3*pi/3
But idk how to get that answer
I tried doing it a xouple of times and keept getting this
<@&286206848099549185>
ooohhh, thanks
np
Separate the shape into a right triangle and a rectangle. Find the areas of each, then add them together to get the total area of the shape.
What would the l and w be for the triangle
I mean b and h
Well, to make the rectangle, opposite sides need to be congruent. So, the rectangle should have a dimensions of 4.8 and 13.5.
That means the triangle’s base is 5.7 - 4.8.
And because the triangle shares a side with the rectangle, the height is 13.8.
Okay thank you, when I do the work can I show you to make sure it right?
@trim breach
Not quite. I think I might have confused you.
The rectangle’s area is correct, but the triangle is not.
Can you draw on paper how it’s supposed to look
Oh okay so what did I do wrong
Oh
What is it?
5.7 is that total segment. 4.8 of that makes up the rectangle.
So the expression to calculate the base of the triangle is:
,,5.7 - 4.8
Lidoh
Ah okay so is the square right?
Yes!
Thank you
at tanx = 1
in the example it said find b
then it just said c = 90 with no explaination.
is there any rule on this?
my guess is the rule is if line a and b pass through the centre in a straight line, then c will always be right angled?
Thales/inscribed angle theorem
@alpine wadi are there more than 1 possible value for 1?
or are we assuming -90<=sin-1(),cos-1()<=90
@acoustic jungle im not sure, thats all the teacher gave me
then it's probably between -90 degrees and 90 degrees.
you will need to know sin(a+b)=sinacosb + sinbcosa
for sin(arccos)) you'll need to draw out a triangle.
for example let theta = arccos(7/25)
the height of this triangle with sides 7 and 25 is sqrt(25^2-7^2) = 24
so sin(theta) = 24/25
and so sin(arccos(7/25))=24/25
do the same thing with the others.
angle c=90 degree so A+B+C=180 B=180-90-37 B=53 DEGREE
use arctanx - arctany = artan((x-y)/(1+xy)) 4 times
or change 4tan-1(1/5) to arctan(120/119) and apply tan to both sides
Thanks
Simplify

yeah i know but, how did you get angle c ?
From her eye, which stands 1.61 meters above the ground, Savannah measures the angle of elevation to the top of a prominent skyscraper to be 24^{\circ}
∘
. If she is standing at a horizontal distance of 340 meters from the base of the skyscraper, what is the height of the skyscraper? Round your answer to the nearest hundredth of a meter if necessary.
what could I do for this?
have you drawn a diagram?
not yet no
start by drawing one
what do i draw for it sorry for asking?
draw some lines/triangle/rectangle to represent the problem
ok so i drew a triangle
would there be a specific side I put down the 340 and 1.61?
in your diagram, there should be an indication of where the ground is
so my adjacent
no
first start by drawing the ground
and vertical lines to represent a human and a skyscraper
did that
Give 2 sphere S1 has radius of 4 S2 is 6 they share both center point of (4:0:0)
Give point A (-4:0:0) and line d tangent with S1 and intersect S2 at B and C
In what condition does the area of the triangle ABC is the largest
And how to calculate it
Hello
I'm in need of calculating a "Look at" rotation/vector between 2 points in space. It is 2d vector operation
So far I have this in pyhton:
import math
# X = ------ x
# Y = |||||| Y
vecA = [100, 0] # look right 90 deg
vecB = [0, 100] # look up 90 deg
eye = [0,0] # centre of world - ignoring for now lets assume were at 0 anyway
dot = vecA[0] * vecB[0] + vecA[1] * vecB[1]
det = vecA[0] * vecB[0] - vecA[1] * vecB[1]
print(math.atan2(det, dot)) ## should give me 90 deg? if its in deg...
This should give me... some value, but all I got is 0 :- (
yep
And they have given the TOTAL surface area as T
TOTAL surface area will be the curved surface area + the area of the top and bottom circles
so that would be 2pirh + 2pir^2 right?
exactly
we basically got the answer already
see the RHS of what they're asking us to prove
we already got 2pir^2
so then I go back to this formula
yup
then I find the height?
and write 2pirh in terms of v
ye
Then I put that formula in the SA formula roght?
then thats how u get the T ig
anytime
hmm no not really
kk
im trying to think 
nothing's coming up lol
I really think we need calculus for this
<@&286206848099549185> is it possible to find the minimum surface area here without differentiation?
Can anyone help me solve my math problem about trigonometric ?
Make The D and F to product
i'm stuck with that
i tried many times
many formulas
the question itself asks you to "convert into product"?
yes man
🤔 yeah im getting stuck too, ill get back to you if i find anything
okay sure thanks man
can someone help me?
yeah im not getting anywhere @granite forge
Angle A = 180 - 90 - 37 , Side b = 15cm/ Sin(37), Side a = Cot(37) x 15 @frail nebula
@tepid crow thanks for your time anyway
@frail nebula do you know law of sines & cosines?
the formula?
or you're already pass that level
im pretty sure i learned it but ive forgotten it
wdym
man i dont even know online messed me up
but idk if i answer your problems it would too high for you or not
like this
in your problems they asking about what formula will ur use
they will talk about law of sines & cosines
its the law of sins i think
i think i should give you an answer with that laws
this must help you
and sorry for not making sense😅
keep concentrate on study online
When drawing a normal line to PQ does the angle become θ/2 or does it stay θ?
<@&286206848099549185>
dont spam!
bro
also normal line throught where?
to R
through R?
jup
yes
just calculate 1/2 of PQ with the angle you know have
thats just a length
but its only half of what you need
yes
so take it by 2 in the end
yes
no need to mess about the angles
lol you just dont have the right intuition yet
nvm im dumb as fuck
yeah i meant i was dumb that i didnt see it cuz I saw it right away after you said it lmao
what class is that?
maths
maths 2 i guess
huh
we dont have it split up like that
integrals, matrices, differential equations, fourier expansion is one class here. its called maths 2
ohhh i saw it was german
jup
What did I do wrong? Idk how to proceed
im getting a imaginary term and idk if that's what supposed to happen
A(theta) and B(theta) is the area function
<@&286206848099549185>
@old fable what is the question
how do you find ab
you can either use AB = CD or prove that using the pythogorean theorem
find the lim as theta -> 0+ of A(theta)/B(theta)
A(theta) and B(theta) are the area functions
of what
what
couldn't you find the answer online
no
pretty sure that proof or smth is in every calculus intro
what proof
so 1/2pi r^2
nevermind then, it's not the proof I was thinking of.
ok
where did i make a mistake?
alright
I haven't taken calculus, but here's what I have. wlog the side lengths be 1
area of triangle is sinx/2. Area of semicircle is d^2pi/8. (d is diameter) d^2 = 1^2 + 1^2 -2cos(x) (cosine law). Substitute in, the area of semicircle is (1-cosx)/4 @old fable
you'll need to figure out the limit yourself
@old fable what did you get?
anyone able to help me with some questions on Interior and Exterior Triangle Angles
sure! what's the problem?
Use the inverse trigonometry complex cool method
Convert into arctan and then do arguments
$\arctan{\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)}+\arctan{\left(\frac{c}{d}\right)}=\arg{(b+ai)}+\arg{(d+ci)}=\arg{((b+ai)(d+ci))}$
September22nd
Use the addition formula. Then for the first part, draw a right triangle with sides 7, 24, and 25, and mark the angle theta where cos(theta) = 7/25, and find sin(theta). Repeat with the other angles and add everything up
0 I didn’t use you method
My first attempt I did Pythagorean theorem but that came out to complicated
But it was way easier
no im not quite sure how to do that
then you'll need to use that and do what mchen10 said after.
nice, I also got 0.
It was way easier than you method haha
We over thought it
what's your method then?
if the radius was 1, the area of the triangle was sin x/2. Using the cosine law, the area of the semicircle is (1-cosx)/4
PM was 10sin(θ/2)
PQ was 20sin(θ/2)
MR was 10cos(θ/2)
And that was just by looking at the triangle
So calculating the limit it was like π/2 • lim tan(θ/2) as θ ->0+
nice, that works too.
Yeah so no cosine law haha
If a triangle has a right angle, then a^2 + b^2 = c^2. If a^2 + b^2 = c^2, then the triangle has a right angle. In other words, a triangle has a right angle if and only if a^2+b^2=c^2.
Help?
try cubing the whole equation, and plugging in what you know
Ok thanks
Cosec θ 🤢
like this?
ΔToni=Toni-Toni_0
y_2=-9, y_1=-7
x_2=-6 x_1=1
and then, when you have the slope, m, you need to use the formula point-slope
ΔToni=Toni-Toni_0
then replace y_0 and x_0 with any of the two points given, (1,-7) or (-6,-9)
and there you have it, your function equation
Hope that this helped a bit
Anyone here?
no, clearly no one is here
people these days
k
I was agreeing with you
no reason to ping me
sorry ig pfft
@pallid plover is h the midpoint of the lines
I don't believe so, I'm pretty sure it's arbitrary?
what is the answer supposed to be in terms of.
im not exactly sure
what have you tried?
Nothing
well try somethin
what do you know that can relate the side of length 13, side x, and the angle 40 degrees?
if you don't know the basic trig equations you should probably watch a video on it
before attempting to solve problems using trig
Worked example evaluating sine and cosine using soh cah toa definition.
Practice this lesson yourself on KhanAcademy.org right now:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/trigonometry/basic-trigonometry/basic_trig_ratios/e/trigonometry_0.5?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=Trigonometry
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/mat...
why if i use theorem of marlen or euclides theorem gives me different results?
What are the rotational symmetries of the rational plane Q^2?
those would be the rotations by angles whose sine and cosine are both rational i suppose
@spring tusk exam?
nah jus homework
sin(60)/cos(60) = tan(60)= sqrt(3). Dunno if this is what they want tho.
2 rad 6/rad 3=? in simplest radical form?
radical
specify which radical
2
so sqrt()
consider the special properties of the type of triangle you are given
have you attempted any of them?
This one looks interesting to try, do you have any ideas?
POOP
wrong server?
Damn I thought you were talking about the rectum
that chamber at the end of the large intestines
Nope, I'm stuck
Given tan 2theta = 0.8234 solve for 0 degrees <= theta <= 720 degrees to the nearest degree (Hint: there are several angles that satisfy )
how would i solve this?
do i jus do the recipricle to find the answer?
<@&286206848099549185>
so the inverse of tan (and then dividing by 2) will give you 1 answer
but from 0 to 720, tan(2x), you'll get the same answer multiple times, so you need to think about the period of tan(2x)
(also reply to my messages so i get ping'd)
so do i just get the recipricle answer and subtract it by 720?
and devide by 2?
i think we should do a few steps before doing this question if that's alright
can you solve tan(x) = 1 for me, and how you get there?
tan^-1 1 =45
be careful with brackets but yes, that's right
what you're using here is "tan inverse" (sometimes called "arctan") - not to be confused with the "reciprocal", which means 1/tan (sometimes called "cot"). i know they use very similar notation but unfortunately it's something to keep in mind
now, 45 degrees is one correct answer. can you give me another answer that solves tan(x) = 1?
uh i cant think of one
root 2025?
here's a bit of a clue
225
yes exactly
now, tan is periodic by 180 degrees. that means that you if you add (or subtract) 180 to any degree, you get the same value of tan (notice that 45 + 180 = 225)
with that, can you give me another answer to tan(x) = 1?
405
perfect
now let's try tan(2x) = -1
can you give me a few answers for that?
135,315,495 and so on
so tan of (those values) gives me -1
but i was very sneaky and asked for tan(2x) = -1
can you modify your answer? (also reply to my messages to ping me)
67.5,157.5,247.5
perfect 🙂 now you can try your original question
ok i think i got the answer for it
i got 379.73402064
i think you're slightly off by a few digits, just double check your calculation (also don't forget to give your answer to the nearest degree)
ok thanks a lot man
want me to check your final answers?
ya if u can
i double checked it n got the same answer
great, if you're happy 🙂
@hazy valve hi can u help me with this
Huh
i don't understand the question?
also in general you're better off asking in the Math Help category, and if no one responds in 15 mins, using the @helpers ping
yeah that makes sense but they should specify to avoid confusion
Like the same triangle, not the same type
I mean you could have the same type of triangle that being an equilateral but not congruent to the initial
So you could have been given a unit equilateral
hm you're probably not getting me
idk how to explain it verbally
What i'm asking is this
so lets say you've been given a 5 cm equilateral triangle
are you only allowed to use that
so we can't change the size of it
yeah but angles won't change
so take in this image for example
all interior angles are 60
apart from the exterior angles
yes i believe so
could someone help me with f
What's the question asking for?
İs there any proper method other than solving for annoying equations and substuting
what have you tried
Help me
someone did try and help, you ignored it
Where?
literally read after you posted the picture..
Idk who she's talking about i didn't know
I mean you also pinged helpers right away, so clearly you havent read the rules
clearly they were talking to you...
who else would they have been talking to?
it was very clearly directed at you, given it was 7 minutes after you posted, and the previous question was from an hour prior to yours
I didn't read the hours after the girl posted her question.
U should've say, " oh someone will help me, look up"
I didn't IGNORED it
That's different
then why didnt you respond to it
you also have yet to answer the question Ramonov asked you
What respond? Why would i respond if i think i am not the one ramonov talking to
Didn't i told u multiple times i didn't know ramonov is talking to me bobalicious kengenemers
regardless, now you know
Yeah i know now
now since you want a ping to make sure:
@earnest basin
what have you tried?
what is a bobalicious kengenemers
sorry about the confusion, i shouldve added detail and not sounded so vague but essentially i needed to determine an equation for F
did you still need help with the question?
yeah
are you familiar with the standard equation of a circle?
not really
the equation of a circle with centre $(h,k)$ and radius $r$ is:
$$(x-h)^2 + (y - k)^2 = r^2$$
ℝamonov
Beautiful😀
Can someone explain this
what part do you need help with?
All
alright so a line is composed of infinitely many points
but a few points are defined in the graph
what are 2 points that form a line where one of them is C
yes
yeah but they are pretty helpful
@wheat dome if you are suicidal then you should contact a suicide hotline and/or get a therapist, preferably both.
oh I'm not lol
I prob should have said that 😳
I've never been more happy to be fair
yea I guess
and too the calculator does make it much easier
Okay, I've been studying trig for about 2 years now and I still don't know what sine ACTUALLY means, when you say sin(30) what are we doing to that 30? why do we have trigonometry at all? I can't comprehend the sine function or the curves in my head, just what??
<@&286206848099549185>
it's the y value of the co-ordinate on the unit circle when the arm makes a 30 degree angle
I still don't quite understand, can you elaborate?
so is there a specific "expression" we have to follow? like f(x) = 4x+3 so sin(x)= ?
what are we doing to the x?
@humble pulsar
I mean, yeah there's taylor expansions for sine and cosine, but what I said is sufficient
a point (x,y) on the unit circle can be written as (cos(t),sin(t)) for the corresponding angle t
nono, why do we have sine, cosine or anything really? how was it invented and how was it defined as originally?
yeah, sorry
"sorry for pinging, let me ping you again"
yeahh, no pings, got it lol
Early study of triangles can be traced to the 2nd millennium BC, in Egyptian mathematics (Rhind Mathematical Papyrus) and Babylonian mathematics. Trigonometry was also prevalent in Kushite mathematics.
Systematic study of trigonometric functions began in Hellenistic mathematics, reaching India as part of Hellenistic astronomy. In Indian astronom...
modern math just stuck with sine cosine tangent secant cosecant and cotangent
I'm much more confused now, What is chord theta? How was it derived? Why did they use sine to define sine? I've had the same problem with other explanations, What are we doing to that 30 in sin(30)??
"why did we use sine to define sine"
this floor is made of floor
and idk im not a historian
Sin(x) can be defined in a lot of ways. The most common one is the one defined for right angled triangles where sin(x) = opposite side / hypotenuse.
This can be used in the real world to find angles given sides or sides given angles.
can someone help 🥲
all of them are asking the degrees dont care about the lang
<@&286206848099549185>
can someone help me with a proof
i got stuck
i need to prove
d => e
this is what ive tried so far
if someone can please help
im not sure if im on the right path
I was trying to show in $\mathbb{H}$ -Poincaré half-plane model- that hypercycles defined for a given line $l$ and a given $a$ in $\mathbb{R}$ as $$H(l)={z \in \mathbb{H} : d_{\mathbb{H}}(z,l)=a } $$
are not lines.
To prove something I tryed to argue that given that $Mob(\mathbb{H})$ acts transitvely on the lines of $\mathbb{H}$ I can find the hypercycles of the imaginary axis and via the $\gamma \in Mob(\mathbb{H})$ that maps my line in the imaginary axis i can state $$H(l)=\gamma^{-1}(H(\gamma(l))$$
Where I'm using the fact that a Möbius transformations preserves distances. At this point I defined [already here i have doubts] $d_{\mathbb{H}}(z,l)$ for a given $z \in \mathbb{H}$ and a line $l$ as the inf of the distances $d_{\mathbb{H}}(z,w)$ with $w \in l$.
Given this and the general assumption $z=a+bi$ and $w=ki$ i'm left with trying to calculate the inf of $$arccosh(1+\frac{|a+(b-k)i|^{2}}{2bk})$$.
Is any of this correct? There is any "distance from a given point to a given line" standard formula in hyperbolic geometry? Thanks for any help and hint.
Stephen
hi
we get, 180-(96+x)=180-(96-x+56) implies x=28 and angle BAC=96-x=68°
btw can you share the question booklet with me?
oohh
danke sehr schön
ofc but its in turkish
nvm can you share? they look awesome
i think i got the pdf. thanks
nice 👍👍👍
the yellow ones are easy, blue ones are medium and pink ones are the hardest ones
okayy
yeah i took geometry
Geometry
I converted -cos2pi/7 to +cos5pi/7 and then we get all 3 in the n*pi/7 where n is odd..but iam stuck there
Ok sure I'll get back with u
club the 1/7 and 3/7 terms
Yea I'll do it
find the sector bounded by an arc whose measure is 2/3 pi radians and whose diameter is 4 ft to the nearest whole number
area of sector*
and 4 ft is meant to be the diameter of the circle that the arc is taken from, right?
yeah
okay, so what is troubling you?
it seems that @naive storm chose not to respond to me even two and a half hours later
who, me? or them?
where's D?
do you find the 2D equivalent of this bizarre too?
that the two tangents to a circle from the same point have the same length?
Can sm help with thiss
do you know how to find the sum of all interior angles of a polygon?
No sorry
(hint: it depends only on the number of sides)
Yeahhh... I don’t know what that means
So do you mind helping me solve it?
to find the sum of all interior angles in a polygon, you don't need to know its exact shape, only how many sides it has
and the sum of all interior angles in a polygon with n sides is 180*(n-2) degrees.
It has 10 sides
So what do I do
What’s the formula
Would is be (180) 10-2?
@dark sparrow
Since it has 10 sides
me: [literally gives you the formula]
you: what's the formula???
no. be careful about your placement of parentheses
I got this is this right?
Thank lmao
I tried expanding and stuff but nothing seems to help
do you have to prove the sin identity given that the cot identity is true?
or the other way around xD
both
Both ig
this looks like it may be very painful to do unless there's some kind of trick for it
hm. i have an idea.
but i'll need some time to write it out in full
all i've managed to do is to reduce the right half of the iff to $$(\cot(\theta) - \cot(A))(\cot(\theta) - \cot(B))(\cot(\theta) - \cot(C)) = \frac{1}{\sin(A)\sin(B)\sin(C)}$$
Ann
dunno how helpful that is
i know how to prove iff-statements, thank you very much
man the typesetting on that site is just painful
what are you trying to accomplish?
How do I start Bc I have no idea how to start this in a 2 column proof
First of all, you learn that D=E
And you learn that ABC = ACB
So: EBC = DCB (E=D)
DBC = DCB (ABC = ACB)
DBC = DBC
$\angle ABC \cong \angle ACB, and \angle BDC \cong \angle BEC$, because angles with the same measure are congruent
mchen10
you can use the third angles theorem to determine that $\angle EBC \cong \angle DCB$, and because the angles are congruent, then their measures are equal
mchen10
Can someone pls help out ....I tried squaring the original eqn and writing and using multiple angle formulae but ain’t working
I did this too but to no avail...Could u be a bit more specific
Cooler Euler
@silver fog
Cooler Euler
Hello,
is that someone would have the proof of Simpson's formulas with the complexes
...what formulas?
this is pre uni
not after uni
Tous formulas cos(p)+cos(q)=2cos(p+q)/2*cos(p-q/2
I think we should use Euler's formula
Yes this is Simpsons formula
first time i've heard it called that
in any case, their proofs rely on the angle sum/difference formulas, which can be proved in the complex case without much trouble
But i would like to solve it with the complex
what do you mean
you want to spend hours and hours painstakingly verifying cos(p) + cos(q) = 2 cos( (p+q)/2 ) cos( (p-q)/2 ) with careful manipulation of complex exponentials?
I m in upper sixth and not in a university. It s a little bite complicated for me but i found the solution.
$\cos(x+y) = \cos(x)\cos(y) - \sin(x)\sin(y)$ is not uni-level
Ann
Simpson formula IS uni level
no it's not i have it in my textbook too
upper sixth student as well
and i thought simpson's formula is for integration?
Why is it called Simpson formula
I'm pretty sure greeks knew it
This may be an algebra problem. Let me know if anyone can help. Translating y=2^x right 3 units and up 5.
simpson's rule for approximating the definite integrals?
No, sum to product formulas in trig
translating a function to the right by n units is the same as subtracting n from x first, then applying the function. translating up is just adding to the function
Hey guys I kinda need help I’m stuck on trying to figure out what delta math is trying to tell me
In France, we learn this formula in the first year of university called "classe préparatoire". With my professor we proove it with the complex.
does any one know if there is an easy way to test whether a point is interior to an arc as in facing the arc from the inside vs from the outside like this:
note that blue point could easily be outside of the radius too on the other side of the circle
so radius check won't cut it
You can check the concavity of the arc around that point
You could draw a line between the point and the arc so that the line has a 90° with the arc
not sure i understand
can you draw what you mean
@maiden pathi tried convexity test but it doesn't work for me
the way i tested it might be flawed tho but i created a polygon of 4 points but the problem is the polygon is complex with intersecting edges so it makes it very tricky
Can you show it?
@rotund garnet
i was hoping to get a nice quadrilateral then use cross products to test convexity
but since the edges some times intersect it didn't work as i hoped
maybe i need to use a different set of 4 points
Why you don't you a straight line?
what do you mean
P -> Arc so that the dot product is 0
im not seeing why derivatives help me here though i can't visual it
When you got a straight line from the x-axis through the arc and the point, what could length of O -> A and O -> P say?
oh you mean check the directions of P-O and ArcP - O ?
The direction ist the same because it's 90° to the arc
well my original thought was to check the direction to the radial vector like this
so if the two lines point the same way i must on the underside of the curve
but it didnt work
I don't understand why you don't you only a straight line and the angle
as you see here the dot is negative but im still on the outside of the curve
because i don't know what you mean by that
can you draw what you mean ?
but you've got 2 arcs going on there im confused by what is going on there
That's the sign for a 90°
yeh but your curve is multiple arcs
And?
im just trying to check this nothing more
im not seeing how your diagram solves that
for convexity
nevermind i think i got it
ryam
hi
i joined this place because i found a proof that i want to share but i am bad at proofs but i discovered this myself
so it starts with these triangles, and the angle between these two triangles (assuming that they are right triangles) is supposed to be 45
idk how to prove it formally, but i made i diagram proving it is 45
or use the cosine law because the middle triangle is a sqrt5 sqrt10 sqrt5 triangle
cos(theta) = 1/sqrt2 => theta = 45
i never heard of a sqrt5 sqrt10 sqrt5 triangle in geometry idk how
i discovered it on accident while working on a ball
Yes. The side lengths are from the pythogorean's theorem.
and since all triangles are "upright", you can tell that there is a right angle there by calculating the slopes (-2, 1/2) and seeing that they are negative reciprocals of each other. knowing that it is a right triangle and isosceles, you can now tell that that angle must be 45
yes, that works as well.
hey which application do you use to edit these figures?
i use gravit designer, its an in browser based vector graphics editor free to use
okay nice
its not for graphing equations though, you cant really make things like parabolas and waves
Do you still need help with that?
I might have an idea of maybe how to do this, it involves trigonometry though, if that’s fine with you
all of them?
gimme a sec
for 33, angle XBC has an angle of 102 degrees i think
that is because of the angle properties in parallel lines and stuff, this is only possible to solve because it is an isosceles trapezoid
since the trapezoid is isosceles, the base angles are congruent, so the left lower angle has a measure of 78 degrees. BC is parallel to AD, and by the same side interior angle theorem, the angle is supplementary to angle A.
sadly yea
idk how to do 34, i think you do 57 - 21 then add 57 but im not sure
anyone here good at proofs? i really need 2 proofs done by tomorrow
we won't do your homework for you here
never said i need you to do my hw but ok
have you tried asking the question...?
sure did sound like you wanted someone to do those proofs for you
if that wasnt the case then you gotta word your questions better
anyone know how to do this
hiii i might can
for 34 use similarities between KLAB and KLMJ
since 2*LA = LM
and 2*KB = KJ
so it should be smooth sailing from here; diff between KL and AB are half as KL and MJ
that's the only one i can do, others seem jibberish
#❓how-to-get-help for the rest
that is correct
lol i just realized mchen10 did 34
DAGNABIT
i love geometry
me too
i rlly love it more than anyone else
oh is that so
and wait a sec i rlly love kar98 and scope x6 too
sorry your hints are beyond comprehension
have you ever TRIED cod ww2?
it's the best interpetration
Ohh he asked a question lol
I thought he just said "I need help" and posted nothing
alot i think
2*57=JM+21. It's a theorem
you can prove it with similar triangles and area.
lol everyone got 34
you seem qualified to do the exercises part
we already did 33 34
name all kar98k zooms then
i mean it depends
on what game u r playing with kar98
not the game
ok lemma see
i meant the alltime hit Real-Life 2 Alyx
bruh cheating
"ok lemma see" do you have a list of scopes from the 20th century lol
i meant "ok lemma think"\
ah yes the all-new innovative mind-seeker
where you can see minds

bruh dude
nothin, just sussin u out
btw it is correct, there are x4 x6 and x8
ok now can we move to #chill
For exercise 1. Use congruent triangles. 2x+20=5x-4. y^2+26 =90 because that is a right angle and AC is double of AF
for exercise 2. Use congruent triangles again
for exercise 3, it seems like trig bash to me.
you mean if a light ray lands exactly on a corner?
it gets scattered.
i suppose so
though a single ray would just bounce off randomly
i think you're overthinking it
in the real world, no corner is perfectly sharp. if you zoom in far enough you'll find rough spots, especially at corners like what you've depicted
¯_(ツ)_/¯
go ahead ridicule me
Maybe some sort of quantum shenanigans
how do you define a tangent
i mean i only know that "tangents are curve that touch a curve at exactly one point"
idk anything else
so you can make this curve yes?
x axis
it's undefined at a sharp point
isnt x axis the tangent line??
the proof is that from the left, the limit is -x but from the right, the limit is x]
thus we have two different tangents which can't happen
no it wont?
a line passing through (0,0) not x axis intersects the parabola at two points
isnt that circular reasoning? cuz you define the derivative at the point to be the slope
well my point is that it's non-differentiable at x = 0
is this true? if you zoom in it intersects twice
so the tangent doesn't exist
but it's kinda circular reasoning ig becuz tangents come before calculus
i mean slopes are primitive than differentiation
you need calculus to rigorously define tangents
except when the gradient is constant, such as for a straight line
okay




