#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 350 of 1
Eo?
so*
no, the circumference is not 64.
How
200.96?
i hate to repeat myself.
the problem says to leave your answer in terms of pi.
so don't do any of this calculator or rounding bullshit.
yeah ik
you could have, and should have, said "The circumference is 64pi."
no, you were not.
yh its still 64?
…..
it's 64pi.
pi isn't a trendy symbol for you to stick next to numbers or ignore at will.
you seem to be under the impression that "64" and "64pi" are one and the same, when they aren't.
okay
and i would like for that not to be the case.
do you understand why you were not "still right" just because your answer was part of the actual answer [to my question]?
mhm
okay, so the circumference is 64pi. as we just established.
and now refer to this again.
what's (1/8) * 64pi?
great.
the concept of "if the person helping you is asking you about something, then maybe it's something relevant to the problem & hence worth finding / thinking about". was this foreign to you?
Hey, I'm helping my gf with her math since she hasn't done it In a couple years
I'm a bit confused on trig, the question asks for what x is equal to
Would I just write "x=9×(x-3)"
pythagorean theorem..
then solve the quadratic
hey, i was struggling with solving the missing variable for these types of problems, how would i solve this equation?
do you know of any useful circle theorems that we can use here? if not, try looking up in your notes.
@upper karma
hi and I do not, I can look though.
yeah no, i don't see any in the notes that I have
do you mean this? @upper karma
yes, precisely.
$$(A+B)\cdot B=(C+D)\cdot D$$
Al𝟛dium
couldn't find any better pic, and can't make a drawing rn so yeah, we'll have to stick to that.
okay
but yeah that's pretty much the theorem, are you able to apply it to our problem?
yes, I think I applied B : 9, D : 8, C : 10, A : x correct?
yes.
are you able to form an eqn and solve it from here?
yes, I am
thank you so much.
you're welcome.
is there a video for a proof of this? im curious how one would go about solving this
consider drawing out triangles PAD and PBC, you can maybe notice something that these triangles have in relationship with each other.
there's a youtube video if you are interested: ||https://youtu.be/wqGmSTPbojs||
Question 5 sounds like you need to find the total surface area of that cylinder, then subtract the area from the top and bottom parts from it.
Question 6 wants you to set up a proportion between the surface areas and values of the two cans. So you would need to calculate the surface area for the dimensions of the new can to get a solvable proportion.
no.
arc length≠arc measure, you probably meant to say arc measure. arc length is well known as rθ, where theta is the angle from the center in radians and r the radius.
I just have a quick question. Given a random triangle with one altitude perpendicular to one side how would you inscribe a right triangle with one of its vertex collinear to that altitude and the other vertices lying on the same point as the vertices on the circumscribed triangle? If possible I would like to know how to solve this through a problem and not with a construction method.
how about drawing a diagram
Oh so the horizontal side is 12cos60 and the vertical side is 12sin60 using basic trig definitions
Sin60 = 1/2 x root 3
Cos60 = 1/2
If you don’t remember how to get the exact values of sin, cos and tan 30 and 60, remember it’s the equilateral triangle with side length 2, with a bisecting line straight through the middle
@dreamy ridge u answering me bro?
Yea
Im not going to lie, can you explain it in geometry terms cause I dont understand sin and cos
please
No problem but Wdym by ‘geometry terms’ exactly
just explain it without cos and sin
So have you not met sin and cos x yet?
I don’t really know how to explain it without trig functions, because the reason the angle is given is so that can help find the sides using sin and cos
Otherwise there’d be no reason for the angle to be given
I think trig is built into the question
Does anyone else know if you can around this without using trig?
Sorry I couldn’t help you man
one question though so what would 12cos60 and 12sin 60 come up to?
12cos 60 will go to 6 as cos 60 =1/2
And 12sin60 = 6 root 3
As sin60 = (root 3) / 2
@jade badger Let's say you have a cube of sidelength 5, you work out the surface area. Then you triple the sidelengths to 15. Then work out the sidelength. What is ratio between the old and the new sidelength? Now it turns out this ratio is independent of the original sidelength. So it doesn't have to be 5. That's why they don't specify a specific sidelength.
Ah ok, the length of sides will be 3 times longer, so the combined area will be 3^2 times longer as the ratio is being applied in 2 dimensions if that makes sense
can i ask whats the formula for cos and sin
tank q
tank q
So what sin and cos actually means
Is just the ratio of sides of a right angles triangle
So have you heard the words hypotenuse, opposite and adjacent before?
@glacial bridge
yeah
So sin (x) where x is an angle is just the ratio of the opposite over the adjacent
Cos(x) where x is an angle is just the ratio of the adjacent over the hypotenuse
And tan (x) = sin(x)/ cos(x)
Which is the opposite over adjacent
So how we could use this is
The fact that sin 60 ( for that question) is the opposite over 12 ( as 12 is the hypotenuse)
Multiplying both sides by 12, 12sin60 = opposite
Now 12sin60 is just a number in your calc
So just type that in
And you get a vertical length
Does that make a tiny bit of sense?
i understand so sin would find the opposite
which is the length
i mean vertical
So for the width ( horizontally), you’d use cos
Yep
What exactly did you type in your calc?
Ah ok
Is it in radians?
Should be in degrees
Basically there is another type of angle measuring unit called radians but that’s irrelevant right now
Just make sure your calc is in degrees otherwise the answer will be wrong
Yep
So the area is just those lengths multiplied together
And that’s it
Rest of the questions are identical, just think about the side you’re finding and whether it’s cos and sin and you should be all set
idk for the sin one the number suppose to be that big tho u think it should be rounded?
I would leave it in exact form
In terms of surds ngl
I never use decimals
I mean don’t round it then work out area
Work out area then round it
If you wanna still use decimals
But the Google calc doesn’t give you surds
It just gives you a decimal
In surd form, sin60 = (square root of 3)/2
So 12 sin60 = 6 root 3
So area = 36 root 3
Which is approx 62.4 to 3sf
@dreamy ridge u got a link to a surd form calculator
I only have a physical calculator
It’s worth buying one, it’ll make your life a lot easier
damn ion got one rn u saying i cant convert to surds online?
I’m not saying you can’t, I have no idea if you can bc I’ve never done that
But I’m looking rn and it doesn’t seem like you can
As I said, I think it’s worth buying one bc it’s really convenient, unless you’re not allowed them for exams and stuff bc otherwise I wouldn’t get too dependent on em
But you can’t do this stuff without a calc unless you’ve been taught exact values of sin, cos and tan
ig ill just do the pythagorem theorem
Yeah use phythagoras, so it’s 144- 36
Is the other side squared
108 = other side squared
Root 108 = other side squared
Split into surds and then you’ll see you still end up with 6 root 3 so it still works
Without trig
But you needed to use that one side using trig to get the other
yeah i did the 2nd one i think i got it right
i got 6 as the vertical and 4 root 5 as the horizontal
Arc length = the radius times the angle in radians
1 degree =$\frac{\pi}{180}$ radians
$
visual of Petter's ascendance
ok
<@&286206848099549185>
Hey guys I just wanted to know if you could tell me the formula for solving this.
I can't remember it for the life of me
Solving what?
To get BA
Then you’d use the cosine rule
So BA^2 = 27^2 +21^2 -2(27)(21)cos 33 deg
No problem, was that it?
Wdym by solving the whole triangle, as in getting all angles
And sides
I’ve never heard that before lol
Ah ok
Mainly looking how to get side c
So now we have BA
We can use either use the cosine rule
Or sine rule
To get CBA or CAB
the assignment is sine and cosine law
And the remaining angle will be 180- the others
So yeah it’s up to you, you could use the cosine rule rearranged to find one of the angles or you could use the sine rule
I prefer the cosine rule if I can, so for eg Cos CBA = (value for BA^2 +21^2 - 27^2)/ 2(Value for BA)(21)
So you can avoid the ambiguous case of the sine rule
Okay so I'm still very confused
How do I find angle A using sine or cosine on this?
Use the law of cosines
can someone read this
,,a^2 = b^2 + c^2 – (2bc)cos(A)
Lidoh
A is your known angle.
a is the side you want to find (which is not adjacent to angle A).
b and c are the two sides adjacent to the angle you are using.
If it helps, rename the triangle using this information.
You have a 90-degree angle and a 45-degree angle in that triangle. Find the last angle. You should notice something that will help you get the other leg of the triangle, and once you have two legs, you can solve for the hypotenuse using Pythagorean Theorem.
How do you calculate the arc length and the area of a sector?
I’m a little confused.
For example: I got 45/2 * pi for the arc length.
how did you get 45pi/2
for the arc length?
yes
pi * 2r
30 pi
multiply by 270/360
90 pi/4
simplify
45 pi /2
Did i do something wrong
for area you can apply a similar idea
For that I got 168.75 pi
because fraction form would not be productive
wdym would not be productive?
alright, so everything is good?
yes, where's the confusion?
help
Find the slope of the function you’re trying to build
Hunnydrips
And then build a linear function using the particularly well-known formula
Hunnydrips
And also, this is NOT geometry, please move to an appropriate channel
$y - y_1 = m(x - x_1)$
Ann
Could someone plz help me with the following question? "In circle O, diameter AOB is drawn and point C is located on the circle such that CA = 12 and CB = 16. What is the length of the radius of circle O?"
okay.
what have you tried so far?
Well ive tried drawing it out on paper and im still a bit confused
can i see the drawing?
Sure
that's good.
do you maybe notice any useful circle theorems that we can use here?
try looking through your notes to see if you notice one.
Well inscribed angles are half the of the arc, but idk if that’s very useful here. I don’t notice anymore in my notes
okay that's not the one i was looking for but it's good as well.
are you able to find the angle ACB, considering the theorem you just mentioned among with what the measure of the arc is?
give it an attempt.
Alright, not very good at trig but I’ll try. Give me a sec
this doesn't really contain trig, just consider the theorem you just stated and in order to find ACB, try to see if you notice what the corresponding arc's measure is.
well to find the angle of acb, i thought you need to use tan-1, cos-1, or sin-1
we can't use any of the trig ratios as we don't know if this is a right triangle.
unless you know it's a right triangle you can't use them.
consider what i said here instead. try to think on what the measure of that arc could be. give it some thoughts.
ok, so angle ACB inscribes the circle of 180 degrees i think because of the diameter so the angle ACB would be 90 degrees?
yes.
good job
Then we can use the Pythagoras therom from there giving you a radius of 10
yes. precisely, good job
Alright, thank you.
What does it mean if lines/rays are distinct ?
Google translate does not do it for me
I'm not native english
Most likely they want to indicate that the lines or rays do not coincide.
Could someone help me please
Just post your question
@upper karma You know the total length of AB (which you have 100% chance of hitting) and you know the lengths of CD and DE, so you can figure out how large a part they are of AB, and thereby the chance of hitting any of those two segments.
so 11+3 over all all the numbers combined?
Yes.
Correct
@upper karma Next time, post questions like these in one of the #questions channels. This is not geometry or trig...
ok my bad
No worries
hi, did i do this correctly?
i used law of sines
i dont know if i applied it correctly or not though
@mental loom wdym
show your work
and we can correct it
but yes, using sine law is the best for this case
106+30=136. 180-136 = 44, so B = 44
a/A = 24/30, which is 4/5,
b/B = 4/5 and 4/5 of 44 is 35.2 (that is rounded up), so b = 35.2
c/C = 4/5, and 4/5 of 106 is 84.8 (rounded up also) so c = 84.8
so
B = 44 degrees, b = 35.2, c = 84.8
👀
wtf
this solution is messy and unorganized
show it in full
with the trig ratios
i don't know what you mean by a/A

a is the side length and A is the angle measure
73° and 73°
You can do like (360°-(115°+31°+68°))/2 for GIJ angle
And the same for the GHJ
In the Law of Sines, you take the sine of the angle measures. I am not sure if that what you did, but your explanation makes it sound like you didn’t.
,,\frac{a}{sin(A)} = \frac{b}{sin(B)}
Lidoh
So we have the hypotenuse and we want to find the adjacent so it’s gonna involve cos
Cos 47 = x/33
So 33cos47=x
thank you so much bro
And for this
would i do 7x+21=(47/2)
?
2 angles in the major and minor of the arc are supplementary
so 7x+21+47=180
They assumed the RTP statement was true from the getgo
From the very start it's wrong
Unclear imo
ask your teacher for clarification then
See what I mean @bleak shell, the problem is the question itself
@narrow seal yes.
you can check using desmos
You're gonna have to translate that
ive tried
for it to be bigger than 0 either both of the parenthasis have to be bigger than 0 or both less than 0
and for each of them
i've got some funky and crazy numbers which im guessing their not cirrect
Idk what to do now
prolly
dayum
4th grade high school
wait what
do you know what class thast is in british system
i'm just completly lost in this math problem
my brain hurted agen
i have to go, but you can try with weirerstrass substitution on the second one if you are stuck.
tomorrow i will check it surely, if you still haven't got helped.
@narrow plinth
In integral calculus, the Weierstrass substitution or tangent half-angle substitution is a method for evaluating integrals, which converts a rational function of trigonometric functions of
x
{\displaystyle x}
into an ordinary rational function of
t
{\displaystyle ...
I mean we're supposed to do this without calculus
That is trigonometry/precalc
Learning about how trig functions work and why/how they are used
I use trig quite a bit on my high school robotics team
anyone wanna help me with my hw
<@&286206848099549185> does anyone wanna help me with my hw
is this the discord crashing gif
ig this is where reduced motion comes in handy
weirerstrass substitution is used in calculus but it's essentially a simple trigonometry substitution.
there's no calculus involved in it.
Ok where do i do that substitution
you can consider using it on both cos(2x) and sin(x), will eventually lead to an inequality with abs signs.
this is just one way to do it of course
i just woke up please, no
hi guys, I am having a brain fart rn and can’t solve this, all I found is that EB is sqrt of 80 and that’s it 🤷♂️, any help is appreciated
oh ye lol like triangle ADC is similar to BCE?
yeah thx, miss-typed
No sweat
Try to find line-segment DE using that
The three triangles are similar, that’s another thing to look at
hmmm like what?
What do you mean?
What do you need brother
If you have side-length EB
Then you can use the proportionality between the triangles and find AE
nah nah I am good, thx for the little push, triangle similarity is ez just totally forgot about it
It’s fine, happens
what
i was just telling you that thats what the class is
-1+2cos(2x+pi/3)+5sin2x
I have to write this in form of p+qcos(r(x-s))
i tried simplifying but i couldnt get that form
you can write sin as cos with phase shift transformations
is it normal that with an initial velocity of 15m/s^2 to get two component vectors that don't add to 15?
additive squares? excuse my ignorance
beautiful thank you v much
@twilit warren , if you can be so kind to help with this last equation. How would I go about solving for t? just a nudge in the right direction I should be able to get it. I just don't ever remember solving for a variable that appears twice like this.
oh this is quadratic equation
at^2 + bt = 0
ah. thank you I'll look up the quadratic solving method.
aditya
oh man this is a wake up call i need to refresh my precal much more.
and you already have a and b as coefficients, im just too lazy to rewrite that
also you could solve by graphing if you want an estimation and are allowed that method
algebraic only unfortunately
yeah that makes sense
oh lol btw here's an alternative
you have an equation of the form
$at^2 + bt = 0$
aditya
aditya
thank you, i appreciate the extra explanation
np!
Would it solve to approx. 1.97?
yep, good job @exotic heron
thanks to you!
could i get some help on this please? i've tried going about this several ways and still can't get it
what even are these curves?
looks like a sine wrapped around a circle
@wise pawn thanks man.
@upper karma well, this is locus of an electron around a nucleus. So, ya , sine waves wrapped around a circle
so just use polar coordinates with radius being a sine in terms of the angle
That debroccoli guy was wrong tho
It'll form an ellipse my man. e²=(1-b²/a²). Just try that. Here a = semi major axis and b= semi minor.
I am a school student why?
No no. I'm indian.😁
Heyyy. Delhi ncr. I'm a dropper.
Boards cancelled 😋
Yeah. Lucky u. Don't slack off tho. Stay at it.
@sonic trail what do you mean by dropper? Could you pls explain the term...
@sonic trail yeah yeah thats for sure...other mummy's slipper is waiting
Hehehe. Yeah! The real motivation behind studying. That chappal😆
@sonic trail yeah I'll also take a drop....now I'm preparing for getting a scholarship in FIITJEE
@sonic trail yeah 😅
Ohh yeah! Do those aptitude type ques. You can score well using that. And try going thru prev years papers + a little bit of 11nth ncert
I was in fitjee too
Hauz khas delhi.
Where are u?
Ok brother....thanks for taking out some time to talk to me 😊😊
I'm fro west bengak
Bengal*
Oiii. Khoob bhalo
Ba bye
x=-8
fr? how
This one no
Google “sum of exterior angles”
I come here to learn Pre AP Geometry
Cuz my teacher doesnt teach
I know a bit but i need to pass the class
Hello guys , I am in 9th grade and I recently learned about trigonometry in the right-angle triangle , about reduction to the first dial and the Theorems of sinus and cosinus and I didn't understand a thing , could you guys give me some help please ? ( I'm sorry if my grammar is a bit rusty )
Im in 9th too
nice
special right triangles?
yes
the special right triangles make it easier to calculate the side of lengths of a triangle if you have the angles for them
i see
so for a 45 45 90 if you are given X you can get the hypotenuse by just substituting
if it was 3 then the side with angle 90 would be 3sqrt2
for 30 60 90 if given X you can plug it in and get the side lengths of angle 90 and 60
hope that helps
yes , thank you
What are you trying to solve? The angle?
I think the adjacent angle of that is 75deg
180-105=75 (supplementary angle)
@worn marsh
@full briar I got the answer for the first
But not the second
Here’s the question
Uh for the second one the rhombus right? The second angle should be 105 and third angle is 75
Np
Just note third angle I use supplementary angle and the second one I think it has to do with the property of the shape (rhombus)
Alright thanks
Hello can someone help me with the answers of my geometry hw
@upper karma do you still need help
If $BC = DC, \angle ACB = \angle ACD$ and $AC$ is common, then triangle $ABC$ is congruent to triangle $ADC$
omeganebula
looking for some kind of explanation on how to go from degrees to radians in pi form
google offers the formula degree * pi/180
to get rads
but how do i know for example that -60 = 2pi/3
they arent
$-60^{\circ}$ is co-terminal with $\frac{5\pi}{3}$
moshill1
yes their tans are the same, but they arent the same angle clearly
$\tan{x}=-\sqrt{3}\implies x=\frac{2\pi}{3}+n\pi , n\in\mathbb{Z}$
moshill1
when n=1 you get 5pi/3 and when n=-1 you get -pi/3
can you explain this calculation
Sure, so ik arctan(-sqrt(3)) = 2pi/3, and ik tan is pi-periodic, so any integer multiple of pi added to 2pi/3 will also be a solution
cause it is..?
I mean you could use double angle with tan(pi/3) to determine it's -sqrt(3)
how do i know that
unit circle
i mean, how do i conjure these numbers
Unit circle, the graph, just learning trig
i have (-sqrt3)(pi)/180
idk why you have that but sure
allegedly thats how radians are calculated
-sqrt(3) isnt radians
right right
ok well that just throws me a step back again
arctan on the calculator just gives me -60
do i use that to get to pi?
$-60^{\circ}\cdot\frac{\pi}{180^{\circ}}=\frac{-\pi}{3}$
moshill1
um and from this to 2pi /5 pi?
tangent is pi periodic, so any integer multiple of pi added onto a solution will also be a solution
so in this case we're solving $\tan{x}=-\sqrt{3}$ and we know $x=\frac{-\pi}{3}$ is a solution, so $x=\frac{-\pi}{3}+n\pi , n\in\mathbb{Z}$ are all solutions
moshill1
so its just convention to use positive values?
Depends on how the principle angle is defined, could be [0,2pi) or (-pi,pi]
and is a calculator the only way to calculate the arctan?
is it a particularly horrible calculation?
I mean if you want to buy the old trig table book, go ahead and use that 
Cause you dont need a calculator to do basic operations with. . .
tan is considered a basic operation?
No
but its just y/x
ok what's tan(37 deg)?
is there no equivalent for arctan?
I mean there's the taylor expansion, but that's calculus. Just use the calculator
alright
so the full route
to solve this kind of question
is tan theta = b/a
use a calculator to get the degrees out of that
then multiply by pi/180
what do you do if theres parameters/variables or something such
or just put your calculator into radian mode. . .
this is not as trivially obvious as you might believe
besides the obvious correlation here i dont really know what radian mode is or how to use it
or how to enable it for that matter
and its only by complete chance that i have a scientific calculator nearby ;p
found a nice chart for the 0 30 45 60 90 degree values
realistically these are the only ones we will encounter in questions
fingers crossed
Is it accurate to say that a radian is the arc length created by a central angle on the unit circle?
A radian is an angle which produces an arc length of 1 on the unit circle
The latter is a great definition
When we say that the sine function relates an angle to the y component on the unit circle, is the angle in degrees or radians ?
It doesn't matter
But if we're talking about the function, it is almost always radians
However, it still makes perfect sense to ask the sine of 270 degrees, for example
Alright. Hmm, if it doesn't matter, why is it that when I put sin(pi) in my calculator (calc. is in degrees) - I get 0.05. And when I put sin(90) (calc. in degrees) - I get 1.
By saying "it doesn't matter" I mean that both choices are possible
For calculators there are usually the degrees and radians modes you are free to switch
Right, I just did, and in radians mode I get that sin(pi) is 0. Why isn't it 1 like sin(90) in degrees mode?
Oh, it's because 90 degrees is pi/2, not pi, right ?
It is
Alright, gotcha 🙂 Thanks
You're welcome
do functions count as coordinate geometry?
like finding domain and range of a graph
is it possible to find the domain and range with given values like this?
I am pretty interested in math and failry good at it but with the whole pandemic we have been going very fast with new chapters and I just can't focus. Do any of you know good resources to learn about sinuses and cosinuses?
yes, cause you can determine the radius
thanks
@muted finch sines and cosines*, you could try khan academy? they usually do a pretty good job of being thorough
Thanks. One more thing. Do any of you know any videos on yt that will help restore my will to learn math?
Yo can anyone help me with this
is there a way to drop off my past exam somewhere, so people can tell me what i did wrong?
Someone here would help you so long as it is a past exam like you said.
what line represents the lower edge of the front view?
does anyone have tips on memorizing theorems and postulates for proofs? or can someone list out the main ones
There are 2 ways to remember geometric proofs, one is to practice them and learn them, the other way is to understand all the proofs, and try reproducing them on ur own, (make ur own variant)
Well I think it's a tedious task especially the second way ... making your own variant 🙏...I mean if you are preparing for some exam then definitely you should follow the first way.. PRACTICE..And if you are fascinated by mathematics then you can go further to do some research on it🙏🙏..
Making your own variant means that u understand the proofs, like u need not remember what triangles were congruent, what lines were parallel, what was cyclic, you try to learn the pattern and recognise things on your own
Evening, I would like to share my solution video on a geometry problem. Thanks.
https://bit.ly/3uk8ftE
which is better
intuitive goemetry or algorithm geometry
as a person learning goemetry right now i would like to know
Help on tests/quizzes isn't allowed
What don't you get about that task?
It's just definitions you have to learn.
half the distance between the highest point and the lowest point.
I don't understand how I'd use this ratio to solve for Figure A, for the other problems I'd usually have an "X", but without one I got thrown completely off the hook
@shrewd kettle your unknown is the perimeter of A
you could find every single side of A if you want
or you could do the smart thing and realize that the perimeter of A is just the scale factor (7/2) times the perimeter of B
Can anyone help me with my finals for geometry
I would honestly really appreciate it
Oh that's smart-
Thanks, I'll be sure to apply that
@storm tree is this a test/quiz/exam thats going on right now
not only do i personally not feel like helping someone cheat on a final, it's also kinda against the rules of the server
I apologize
we're not graduating for you
i could help a bit, but im becuase i genuienly think this will help by concept. for(1b) to sketch the circle find the point at (4,-3) make a line 5 unite from it and start circling.
- they left
- don't help them cheat
inverse trigonometry sure is a thing
as a bonus, this is the right channel to ask questions about it
Yep its bonus
$y = \sqrt{2}$? or $y = \sqrt{x}$?
Ann
anyway this is the kind of thing that can be solved using calculus, specifically the integral for arc length
yes
this will belong in #calculus tho
but in your particular case you will have $\int_a^b \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{4x}} \dd{x}$
Ann
ryane
let's move to calculus
Is this a contest problem?
Here I am visiting again
so there's this really weird problem
and im ataully stumped
can anyone help me?
ok I guess ill ping?
<@&286206848099549185> can you take a look at this problem?
It really has me stumped
is the area of the shaded area of the circle the lateral area of the cone?
that's my current understanding of the problem
yah
ok just simply speaking: if we are to calculate the area of the shaded region, it should be area of the circle times the ratio of the shaded region
so
$\pi(56)^2 * \frac{225}{360}$
birschlatte35
@night vigil
alright
so
hmm
yah that could work
oh yah that works
thats such a good formula!
haha im not usually that active
lol
so really only like half the helpers are
i mean if you really want a helper's attention
you should go ask on one of those questions #s channel
oh
Hello everyone!
What would be a good book to start off with to revisit the basics of trigonometry and geometry?
You should also prob ask it in #book-recommendations
how do i find the volume when there's like thickness?
the answer to #3 was 180 if thats helpful in solving it
my initial ideas:
splitting the vase into like 4 parallelogram solids
the top 3 solids are the same and the one on the bottom isn't because there is thickness on the bottom
first 3 solids:
since the thickness is 1.5 on the sides, i subtracted 6-1.5 and 3-1.5 to get 4.5 and 1.5, and that's to get rid of the thickness. and then i did 4.5x1.5x2.5 to get the volume which is 16.875, and the 3 solids are the same so 16.875 x 3 = 50.625
bottom solid:
the sides and the bottom are 1.5 thickness
6-1.5=4.5 3-1.5=1.5 2.5-1.5-1
4.5x1.5x1 = 6.75
volume: 50.625 + 6.75 = 57.375
but on the answer key its 95, so i'm not sure how they got that so pls help if u know how to do it
@sand root Is it (c) you are stuck on, and what have you tried?
Note that the scribbled right angles on your questionnaire are not necessarily such.
Also, you are to prove that |AB| = |BC| (not that |CD| = |BC| which the markings on those segments suggest).
how could i prove they are the same
Well, one way is to prove that the triangles ABO and ACE are similar. You then know that |AE| = 2|AO|, and from similarity |AC| = 2|AB|, from which |BC| = |AB| follows.
trianlgfe abo?
If you draw a line from B to O you will get a triangle from the three points ABO.
|AE| is twice the length of |AO| (diameter vs radius)
I think from the original description they want you to show that the triangles ADE and ACE are similar, but I found it easier with ABO.
The scale factor, 2 in this case, can only be applied if the triangles are similar.
but couldnt we just have skipped to ae = ao^2
Not squared...
x 2
Here's what I did: https://www.geogebra.org/geometry/sppt2pce
ahh ic ty
im kinda confused, how would you solve for this?
I know W is 70
and its asking for a quadratic equation based on the "solve for all values" part
why would you even need a quadratic equation for this
applying properties of radii and isosceles triangles to form a linear equation is enough
all the lines coming from W are radius
ah cool
yeah I just did 2x+70=180
and I have no idea how to do this, maybe splitting the triangle up? but I don't know if YX = WX
Angle BAO = angle CBD
It looks like you can find the diagonal of that square and split the larger triangle that way by adding the radius and diagonal to form a leg. Then you could use Pythagorean Theorem since you would have two sides.
there is no need to use trig
Someone told me too
Angle BCD = 1/2*angleO = 90
So angle BCD = angle ABO
And 2 similar angles is enough to say 2 triangles are similar
Oh sorry nvm Lidoh was answering another problem
What’s the proof though
uhhh
im struggling to understand how my teacher got this
like...why would finding the square root of 960 and 375 here to get the scale factor and volume ratio not work?
but yet it works here?:
anyone?
is anyone free in here to answer a question?
@fast pulsar
6e^i(pi/12)
=6cos(pi/12)+6sin(pi/12)i
= (This is where my calculator gives me the wrong values from my hw)
cos = 5.9999 sin=.02741 (not rounded yet)
Answer is
=5.796+1.553i
My question is maybe it is a setting problem in my ti-84 calculator but I don't know what is wrong
The problem is moving from complex to rectangular form
radian vs degree mode?
degrees
I believe I figured it out
I set my mode to real numbers instead of a+bi
stupid of me
I have gotten the right answer
on my calculator thank you for checking in @dark sparrow
Euler's formula is completely false when in degrees. You MUST be in radians for it to be true
$e^{i90}\neq \cos(90)+i\sin(90)$
dackid (jump king +)
tytyty
Can someone help me
16 and 12
Iam just confused on how to solve the formul
Formula
Use soh cah toa
What your teacher did was simplify the ratio between the surface areas of the triangular prisms by dividing the numerator and denominator by 15. You can see that taking the square root of the simplified ratio gives a scale factor, and that scale factor is cubed to get the volume ratio.
how to calculate Fp
separate out F_BR and F_CR into their x and y components
hi, can someone explain where this 1/10 came from?
the equation on the 3rd line
the right side has x/10
the derivative of that is x'/10
yeah i asked another question there
its been quiet
this question is kinda related to trig so i thought id ask here instead lol
oops i mean't I asked in #precalculus not #calculus
Does anyone know how I'd go about learning the volumes and surface area formulas for 3d shapes? there are so many of them and I have a test tomorrow in which we aren't provided a key for them 😭
which shapes are you struggling with
im not the best at geometry but I found it pretty intuitive to determine the volume and surface area formulas by thinking about the dimensions logically
like for a cylinder, the surface area is just the area of the top and bottom circles
and the circumfrence of the base of the circle multiplied by the height
so the area of a circle is pir^2, and since you have two of those, you multiply it by 2 to get 2pir^2
and for the side of the cylinder you basically just want the circumference of the circle multiplied by the height of the cylinder
so you have 2pirh
and then you just add them up
so you have 2pirh + 2pir^2
and for the volume, you are basically just looking for the area of the base of the circle multiplied by the height of the cylinder
so you have pir^2*h
don't know if this helps but it's how I think about things
I found all sides of the 2 right triangles but how do I use it to find F_P
Does anyone know if radiants are actually useful compared to deegres? I know you have a formula that you can use with radiants, but are they good for anything other than that?
the word "radians" has no t in it
anyway, using radians as a unit can often make calculations simpler for things involving rotation
and there are also reasons why radians are more natural but they require calculus to fully explain
made a circle using lua in unity and shapes, using sin and cos
Radians give vastly cleaner numbers to work with when dealing with Trig Functions
I'm not sure how to use them to draw circles
that's actually pretty impressive
oo thank you
I would think that by the Pythagorean theorem
Sorry blanked out there xD
no problem, it happens 🙂
Do you know the relationship between the scale factor and the surface area?
Not quite. It gives you the surface area of the shape.
would I do 4^2
It wants to know what happens to the surface area when the dimensions are multiplied by 4.
it increases
Yes. Now we need to know what the surface area is after we multiply the dimensions by 4.
51/2 x 4
Why did you divide by two?
2 to 1
1:4 x 4/4
No need to multiply.
so u divide by 4
1/4 is the scale factor.
0.0625
The relationship between scale factor and surface area is this:
If. x:y is the scale factor x^2:y^2 is the ratio of the surface areas.
i got 0.0625
Yes, or you could also write is as (1/16).
ok thx
So we can set up a proportion with this.
Since we know that the surface area of one shape is 51. But we need to get the SA of the new shape.
its 816
thx
hey
does anyone have any idea on how to solve this type of question?
i was thinking to do costheta = sqrt3/2
but im not sure
yes, that's the 1st step
Yeah since it's an exact value
yes
thanks
Can someone help me
Lol i posted the picture it’s just taking a long time
I have to prove this
1+ sec^2 x (sin^2 x) = sec^2x
multiply both sides by cos^2x
Nvm I got it
Can anyone tell me meaning of this .
Find two transformations (registers) to align the vector op with the unit vector j of the positive axis of y, where o is the center of the coordinate system and p is a given 3D point. Then implement them by applying them on different primates.
No cheating.
hey
i started off with the blue rectangle
then i multiplied 500 * (800/500) to get the height of the green box (312.5)
500/312.5 = (800/500)
the hypotenuse if the red square is 800 + 312.5
let's look at the point with the black line above the blue box (length 500) and the line to the right of the blue square (length 800)
that line is 312.5 in length
what is this point called?
wait those squares aren't equal are they
no they are
sqrt(800 / 312.5) = (800/500) = (500 / 312.5) = (312.5 / 195.3125) = (195.3125 / 122.070313) = ...
evening, quick question, sin(pi - a - b) = sin(a+b) right? when using the identity sin(a-b) = sin(a)cos(b)-cos(a)sin(b)
if i rearange sin(pi-a-b) = sin(pi-(a+b)) i can use sin(a-b) = sin(a)cos(b)-cos(a)sin(b) to make it sin(pi-(a+b)) = sin(pi)cos(a+b) - cos(pi)sin(a+b) giving me a result of sin(a+b)
the unit circle
can you define sin and cos for us?
it's better if i send an image, kind of hard explaining it with only words
but basically, when you make a circle of radius r=1 , the tip of the radius "lands" on the coordinates x = cos(a) and y=sin(a)
where our a is the angle made from the positive x axis with the hypotenuse
the unit circle is pinned
how is a measured?
this angle a is also the "semi circumference" the hypotenuse line makes with the positive
before calculus was discovered, with measuring tools
they calculated the area with different methods
so a can be anywhere from 0 to pi / 4?
slicing the circle like a cake
putting very small squares and rectangles inside it
yeah that's a good proof, good job you're right
thanks for the help