#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 314 of 1
so is it-3i+6i?
yes, that is correct
ok here is what i dont get. the answer will be -3i
so is the final answer is 3+3i or 3-3i?
Yes
yea idk which one is the right asnwer tho
which one do you think it is?
second one
and how come?
cuz the answer from -3i+6i is -3i
what's -3+6 ?
acutally its 3
the answer will be -3i
Is this what the answer book says or?
acutally its 3
correct so -3i+6i would be?
3+3i
yea
great, because I suck at explaining lol
It is trivial
everything is trivial apparently
It is trivial
... Again?
https://discordapp.com/channels/268882317391429632/326138757474680852/761604758384410664
just bumping this real quick since I dont want to get it lost in the chat
But the point B(2,0) does not lie on the circle then as you have mentioned
How so?
Could you take a look at the geogebra example I linked with it? That might convey better than my words
But the point B(2,0) does not lie on the circle then as you have mentioned
Apologies, radius is 2, not 4
the diameter is 4
(0,2) and (0,-2)
The eqn of the circle is x^2 + y^2 = 4
Using this and the distance formula, take any point (x,y) on the circle and solve them
having a problem, probably user error
i know that the tan(1.7) is 59.53 degrees
but when i plug that into a calc, it's giving me 5.318....
I think you mean arctan(1.7)
lol, ya
,w arctan (1.7)
There you have it
so, trying to help my son with his homework
his question is cot(theta) = 0.1051042353
err
fixed
i know to tan both sides
but when i do...
,w tan(0.1051042353)
cancel out the cot?
No
ah, supposed to be arccot?
well u can multiply both sides by tanx/0.105.... if that is what u mean
multiplying by tanx removes the cot
i'm afraid i don't know what you mean by tanx
clearly tan(theta)
i'm trying to find theta
yea so obviouslty inverse tanx after u rearrange
is that right?
take reciprocal of both sides
apply arctan, write general solution if needed
the output will depend whether the calculator is set in degrees or radians
arctan, or tan?
$\tan(\theta) = \frac{1}{\cot(\theta)}= \frac{1}{0.1051042353}$
ramonov:
is there another way, if i don't have arctan on my calc?
on your calc it'll use less desirable notation:
$$\tan^{-1}$$
ramonov:
usually accessed from shift or 2nd function of the tan key
degrees, i think
convert manually by multiplying by 180°/pi
and/or use a proper hand held sci-calculator
i'm confused. if
$\tan(\theta) = \frac{1}{\cot(\theta)}= \frac{1}{0.1051042353}$
then why isn't
$\tan^1(\theta) = {\cot(\theta)}= \f{0.1051042353}$
thnkr:
well that didn't come out well
cot is the multiplicative inverse of tan
not the function inverse (over a certain interval)
i'm guessing that there is a key difference between something being a multiplicative inverse and a function inverse?
trying to google an explanation of the difference
oh I think I see what youre actually asking now
which is a bit related I guess
$\tan^{-1}$ is suboptimal to represent the function inverse for $\tan$ since it can cause confusion
ramonov:
the use of the ^(-1) is an exception and shouldnt be interpreted as an actual power
$\tan^{-1}(x) \not\equiv \frac{1}{\tan(x)}$
ramonov:
i don't mean to take your time for granted, but trying to help my son. is there some way you can explain the difference between a multiplicative and inverse function, with some example as to why they are different?
so that i can try to explain it to him?
x is the multiplicative inverse of 1/x since x * 1/x = 1
and it's probably better to look up the formal definition of an inverse function than me explaining it here
ah, i think i got it
You may have been taught that notation like $\tan^{n}(x)$ is used to represent $(\tan(x))^n$ \
However there is an exception when $n=-1$. \
The use of $-1$ in that position is used to denote the function inverse.
Due to this source of confusion it is generally better to represent the inverse of trig functions using the \textbf{arc} prefix.
$$\arcsin, \arccos, \arctan$$
ramonov:
and then there's more stuff about them not being true inverses
hmmm. there's still room for confusion in that example
well, the way i'm trying to wrap my head around it is by replacing tan/cot with 2, 1/2
err
yes
however, i find that it still carries over to tan/arctan
because if i do tan(x) = n, and replace tan with 2
2x = n. and if arctan n = x, then it still works as a reciprocal somehow, because
(1/2)n = x
if $\tan(x) = \frac{a}{b}$ then $\cot(x) = \frac{b}{a}$
ramonov:
applying that to your question:
$$\tan(\theta) = \frac{1}{\cot(\theta)} = \frac{1}{0.1051042353}$$
ramonov:
does that step make sense so far?
ya
if they only want the principle solution where -pi/2 < theta < pi/2
then you can apply the arctan function to the tan(theta) and the fraction
$\arctan(\tan(\theta)) = \arctan\br{ \frac{1}{0.1051042353}}$
ramonov:
for -pi/2 < theta < pi/2 (in radians) or
-90° < theta < 90° (in degrees)
arctan(tan(theta)) = theta (from properties of the inverse function)
and the right side will be what the calculator gives you
ah, i think i got a good analogy
whereas 2^(-1) = 1/2
this is more like
(multiply)^(-1) = divide
pi
,rccw
Anybody got an idea for solving for r? I saw a similar video online with 3 squares but I wanted to give this a try
Its just something I came up with not homework or anything
what is sin60? r/h? @full hatch
That's referring to the small right triangle with the base = x and the hypotenuse = h
It may be easier to ignore my work tbh no guarantee its right 😂😂😅 im just messing around
What am I doing wrong 😀
you can just get an integer answer when you multiply 16sqrt(2) by itself
you dont need to distribute
you can just get an integer answer when you multiply 16sqrt(2) by itself
@west basin
Thanks but is it a coincidence that Area = 512 but that’s also what X squared equaled?
does anyone know the right channel for this question?
or if anyone could help me solve it
x^2 is literally the area of a square
x^2 is literally the area of a square
@west basin
So I didn’t have to do all that? I could’ve just stopped there and gotten my answer? 😭
no you still have to do it to get x in the first place
if you know properties of righr triangles its easy
My answer could’ve just been what x squared equals?
I dunno what those are 😔 lemmie search that up
Hm I know all of that, I didn’t know it had a name. It’s just all the basic facts related to pythag
well the helpful one is that in a 45 45 90 triangle the length of both legs will be equal to sqrt(2) * hypotenuse
so you can get 16sqrt(2) easily
and use the area of a square formula
@late dirge Are you supposed to define it in terms of Z?
Alright, one second let me get a drawing up
What part are you stuck on?
well the helpful one is that in a 45 45 90 triangle the length of both legs will be equal to sqrt(2) * hypotenuse
@west basin
Thank you, I will note that down for similar problems like this in the future
if you've done any work so far
so Ik both are isosceles triangles
and the angle that's uhh forgot the word "opposite?" of z is 180-z
anddd that's kinda it
@covert rune
I think I got it
Alright, so in the triangle with z in it we see two angles that should be equal to each other
We know that because it's an isosceles triangle, these angles would be equal to each other
And because we know the sum of angles in a triangle is 180, we know z + 2(a) = 180 where a is one of the unknown angles in the triangle with z in it
ah ok
When we subtract z from both sides, we get 2(a) = 180-z
Dividing by 2 gives us angle (a)
ohh and now we know the 2 angles on the right triangle
Right
So let's look at the left triangle now
We know angle PRS = 180-z because they are supplementary angles
We then find the two equal angles on the left triangle in the same way as the right
(180-z) + 2(b) = 180 where b = the unknown angle on the left
and then we simplify to get b
That's right
yoo it makes much more sense now
we know that the angle PSQ is a + b so we simply plug in our values to find it in terms of z.
Just worked it out and realised that the z terms cancel out, so be careful to not leave any Z terms in your final answer @late dirge
what are you trying to find?
just to confirm a = (180-z)/2 and b = 180 - 2z?
b = z/2
oh
That's why it's not working out
hold up let me see why I got that answer
OHhhh
I added 180 and 180 isntead of subracting
dw about silly mistakes like that, still early in the term so once you practice these types of questions you'll be able to minimize mistakes
👍 Good luck dude
thx
ah so the answer is 90 degrees
wait what
(180-z) + 2(b) = 180
shouldn't z be negative then
2(b) = -z
b = -z/2
@covert rune
sorry for asking so much
@Star_#1337 Okay so basically the reason that the area gave us the same number as x squared is because in a 45,45, 90 triangle the length of both legs will always be equal to sqrt(2) * hypotenuse
So you just solve for 16|2 with the help of the formula for finding the area of a square which is a^2, which is also the original area formula which is a = l(w) ?
ohh nvm I just understood it now, distributive property sorry for the ping
well the helpful one is that in a 45 45 90 triangle the length of both legs will be equal to sqrt(2) * hypotenuse
@west basin
Please @ me if u reply :
np
@hallow crystal Hi, it seems like you accidentally put (32)^2 instead of (sqrt32)^2
Otherwise your work seems to be fine
Wait my bad
didn't read the question properly for a second lol
@west basin Okay so basically the reason that the area gave us the same number as x squared is because in a 45,45, 90 triangle the length of both legs will always be equal to sqrt(2) * hypotenuse
So you just solve for 16|2 with the help of the formula for finding the area of a square which is a^2, which is also the original area formula which is a = l(w) ?
if i'm not bothering you, what program did you use to make this drawn?
haha no worries, but do my statements make sense? I tried to restate what @west basin and figured color coding would help
if i'm not bothering you, what program did you use to make this drawn?
@upper karma
Medibang!1!!1 and it isn’t a bother at all, ping me next time 💖
haha no worries, but do my statements make sense? I tried to restate what @west basin and figured color coding would help
@covert rune
Looks good
@covert rune
Thank youu
One little detail, though
In your explanation, you put the legs of a 45,45,90 triangle will be sqrt2(hyp) but it's the other way around
The hypotenuse of a 45,45,90 triangle will be sqrt2(leg)
well the helpful one is that in a 45 45 90 triangle the length of both legs will be equal to sqrt(2) * hypotenuse
@west basin
HAHA yea sleep deprivation from school got me tripping too
Oh which one’s correct? Urs or star’s(which is what I wrote)?
Cuz I’ve never heard of that property before rip
Let me fact check
Well if you plug in star's own, you get sqrt2(16) = the leg which is correct
My own was referring to a different equation, but it's also correct
Either one is fine for this problem
Ohh alright so I can just ignore urs since it doesn’t apply to my problem?
Ohh alright, so I’ll only write star’s down?
👍

They're basically the same equation, however, star's own is put in a different form
(multiplied both sides of my equation by sqrt2)
You can choose whichever one is easier to read at that point
@covert rune It’s true! :D
@covert rune by the way does this property have a title?
Should I just call it “property of 45-45-90 triangle”?
I have n clue what those are 
They're pretty simple
Do you learn about sin and cos in geometry honors
Which class are you in right now?
it's usually taught at class/grade 9
oo i think we’ll be introduced to it towards the end of the year
Basically, they're just the ratios of the leg of the triangle and the hypotenuse of the triangle
Because you need a calculator for sin and cos right? I remember him saying we’ll start utilizing calculators at the end of the year
In other words 1/sqrt(2)
Sin and cos can be simplified to fraction form like above
But only for special right triangles
(45-45-90 is a useful example)
You don't need to worry about them too much at this stage
The ones which are most commonly taught are 30-60-90 triangles and 45-45-90 triangles
Cuz I know 30-60-90 is also one
There are more, but you usually don't need to learn them
Oh so u don’t need to memorize them like how u have to memorize squares
You only memorize ratios for special triangles
Otherwise, you'd just use a calculator or leave it in an unsimplified form
Ohh those 6
I see
Alright well I’m gonna start homework now that I’m satisfied with my notes :’)
Thanks for the help again
No problem
For number 2, how do we know that Pat’s house isn’t diagonally in between Moore St and Joe’s House?
Why straight down?
Seems like the question is missing information. There are multiple possible values, but since they're asking for a single point we assume it's directly under Joe's house because it is the most simple answer
Seems like the question is missing information. There are multiple possible values, but since they're asking for a single point we assume it's directly under Joe's house because it is the most simple answer
@covert rune
So -7, -.5 is technically not the right answer?
Again, it's a very ambiguous question
-7,-5 Would be "technically correct" but because it seems as though they want you to find the midpoints we assume that it's -7, -1/2
-7,-5 Would be "technically correct" but because it seems as though they want you to find the midpoints we assume that it's -7, -1/2
@covert rune
Well I mean the -1/2 part is correct but technically x1 can be anywhere on the x axis right 😔
For Moore street, yes
x1 for the midpoint can technically be anything because Moore street is an infinite line along the x-axis, but we assume it is -7 because it's the simplest option.
So on a test anything would be right?
It wouldn't be the intended answer, so they would likely mark it as incorrect
Smh...
Because there are multiple possible answers the way to go is usually the simplest answer in ambiguous questions like these
Is there no technical term for it? Isn’t it called all real numbers domain
You can express the possible area in which pat's house can be stationed at as an inequality. They seem to be asking for a point though
Smhhh
Thank you again uwu
I’ll keep in mind to always look for the simplest route when it comes to problems like these
Because I immediately drew a diagonal line
Instead of a straight one
By the way did your teacher make this problem?
Cuz diagonal felt more natural at the moment
By the way did your teacher make this problem?
@covert rune
Yea that screenshot is from the google meet lol
I just emailed him about this problem cuz I’m a lil petty and wanted to make sure I was t missing any information 😀
You can probably ask them about it then, if you get to know your teacher's "test-writing habit" you can get a better idea of what they expect of you
👍
^^^!!!! Yes
gonna go to sleep but the first 4 pages only have 2 mistakes, in question 2 (9,-5) needs a different x value and (19,58) needs a different y value
remember to plug your values when you’re done to verify your answer easily
hey peeps can anyone explain how to get "cos 30" without calculator? teacher said we have to be able to get certain sin,cos without using calculator.
draw your unit circle
30° is π/6 so draw a line with an angle of π/6 (one third of the perpendicular)
And you find sqrt(3)/2
Well with this method you have to remember the value sqrt(3)/2, but you don't need to remember the angle
You have only 5 values to remember : cos(0), cos(π/6) cos(π/4), cos(π/3) and cos(π/2). For the values of sin in this quadrant, you just go in the other direction (cos(0)=sin(π/2), cos(π/6)=sin(π/3), cos(π/4)...
And for the other values, it is all very easy (cosx=cos(-x), sin(x)=sin(π-x),... . And with the addition formulas you can get cos(π/12) for example
that implies you know the radians equivalent already
you can derive it it from drawing an equilateral triangle,
splitting it down the middle and apply pythagoras
I find the radians equivalent more intuitive
But you can have the same method with 30°
i assumed the question was about deriving instead of memorising and reading off a table
It is far too long to prove the values each time you want to use them
if for some reason you "forget", its good to know how to get them
If you remember the 5 values I sent above, with a unit circle you can find which one corresponds to each standard value
Well indeed. But try to remember them xD it will be very useful
cayteg:
by point i mean circle btw sorry
A bit difficult exercise for me guys
$AD$ is the diameter of $\zeta$
cayteg:
@charred jolt The equation of a tangent line to the graph $f(x)$ at the point $a$ is given by $f'(a)(x-a) + f(a)$. First, calculate the derivative of $f(x)$, by the chain rule this is $2\left(-\dfrac{1}{1-(x^2-2x)^2}\times (2x-2)\right)$. Evaluating this at $x = \dfrac{1}{2}$ we obtain $\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{\dfrac{7}{16}}} = \dfrac{8}{\sqrt7}$, what's left is evaluating $f\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)$ which in this case is $2\arccos\left(-\dfrac{3}{4}\right)$. Putting it together we obtain $y = \dfrac{8}{\sqrt7}x - \dfrac{4}{\sqrt7} + 2\arccos\left(-\dfrac{3}{4}\right)$. I may have evaluated something wrong so be sure to check the answer yourself. Also this is more of a calculus question than anything since it involves derivatives, you should prob keep it at the calculus channel
cayteg:
in question 2 (9,-5) needs a different x value
Ohh I forgot the multiply -5 by 2
@covert rune what am I doing wrong
@hallow crystal for your X coordinate on problem 2,you set it up correctly, but you multiplied the -5 by 2.
It should've remained -5 + X = -4
Thus getting X = 1
It should've remained -5 + X = -4
@cedar sparrow
But I thought you were supposed to multiply to both sides?
Why else would the (2) be next to the -5+x
OHHHHH
Oop lol, does that mean you got it?
Yea cuz the denominator is only on the left side gotcha
Yee! So it cancels it out.
yes haha very helpful thank you, but u should finish ur explanation 😏
I was just gonna say imagine multiplying a sum and then dividing that new sum by 2. You'll get the original sum. They cancel out.
:p
Ohh naisu :DD
I was just gonna say imagine multiplying a sum and then dividing that new sum by 2. You'll get the original sum. They cancel out.
@cedar sparrow
Fixed it and added some notes
gonna go to sleep but the first 4 pages only have 2 mistakes, in question 2 (9,-5) needs a different x value and (19,58) needs a different y value
@covert rune
Is my homework right
Plug in your values using the formula to find out
Plug in your values using the formula to find out
@covert rune
Wait I can do that? :0 I thought my only way to check my work was graphing
how do I rotate 90 degrees clockwise not about the origin?
doesntr work for arbitrary points
when rotating $(a,b)$ around $(x,y)$ by 90 degrees, $(-(b-y) + x, (a-x) + y)$
how do I rotate 90 degrees clockwise not about the origin?
@brisk holly translate the point so that it is around the point, rotate it, than translate it back.
^^^^^^ what Star said.
Star_:
sorry forgot that part
and how about counterclockwise?
Star_:
it works perfectly, thanks so much @west basin
np
@west basin could you tell me how to check my work with the midpoint formula 🥺
wheres the work to check
kinda a lot to read but are you trying to prove that the two endpoints have a midpoint of (5, -8)?
show that when you use the midpoint formula on T and your value S that it gives (5,-8)
if i read correctly
kinda a lot to read but are you trying to prove that the two endpoints have a midpoint of (5, -8)?
@west basin
Yea, I already have my answer but I wanna check my work
I know with the endpoint formula I can just plug in but with the midpoint formula I thought my only way was to graph
well it gives you the midpoint
you just need to prove that it is actually the midpoint between the given point and your point
show that when you use the midpoint formula on T and your value S that it gives (5,-8)
@west basin
Oh I know how to check my work for the second half cuz I had to find the endpoint formula for that, but I’m talking about the first half questions where I had to find the midpoint
im confused
you need to prove the midpoint is the midpoint using the midpoint formula?
Plug in your values using the formula to find out
@covert rune
;-;
you need to prove the midpoint is the midpoint using the midpoint formula?
@west basin
I just wanna make sure my answer is right by checking my work
Tavior said I could do that by plugging in the values into the midpoint formula
to find the midpoints use the midpoint formula
thats literally it
if you can do some simple math then your answers should be right

Plug in your values using the formula to find out
Then what did u mean by this user @covert rune 😭
@hallow crystal Plug in your values of x and y in the midpoint and endpoint formulae
For example on the first one, (9 + (-5))/2 = -2
We see that this works out to be 2=-2 which is false
Therefore the x value for that problem needs to be changed
For example on the first one, (9 + (-5))/2 = -2
@covert rune
What question is that? I don’t see it on my hw
@night basin
Can you come up with two functions that, given a y-value, tells the distance to the two points?
well i did take it all the way through and ended up with with + or - square route of 23.625
but after checking my work again with pythagorean theorem it didn’t really add up
Well, it should satisfy that equation you wrote above
,calc sqrt(23.625^2 + 255) - 3*sqrt(23.625^2 + 4)
Result:
-42.612894132462
Hmm yeah that's a little off
I imagine you went forward by first squaring both sides. Did you square the 3 as well? @night basin
yes
y² + 255 = 9(y² + 4)
yeah i just wrote that exact thing down and was gonna take a photo
y² + 255 = 9y² + 36
219 = 8y²
y = ±√[219/8]
yoooooo
i fked up lol
nah hold up that 255 i wrote is wrong
it’s supposed to be 15x15 which is 225
Oops yeah that won't help
I didn't check 15² haha
,calc sqrt(23.625^2 + 225) - 3*sqrt(23.625^2 + 4)
Result:
-43.143865041432
that’s why i think my fallacy lies in the setup
Even if your setup is wrong, your solution to it should satisfy your setup
I think u gotta consider +- too if its all the points
But your setup looks good
obviously but we start at y=0 for both points
so the - would just be -y not anything weird
y² + 225 = 9(y² + 4)
y² + 225 = 9y² + 36
189 = 8y²
y = ±√[189/8]
can we simplify y
189 is divisible by 9
find the largest square i suppose
8 can be simplified into 2sqrt(2)
3sqrt(21) I suppose for the numerator
the decimal always comes back to 4.860556
but plugging it in is weird ash and like doesn’t work 💀
What?
so like one side = 15.76784703122148
noooo 🙏🙏🙏😂😂😂
I WAS RIGHT THE WHOLE TIME
appreciate it y’all helped me come to my senses
https://gyazo.com/5fe58385a0d1a60729c505aaa0d0794c
@covert rune
Ohh, i get what u mean, I used the endpoint formula to check my work for the midpoint :)
For second one did they mean “find the missing y coordinate” instead? 😀
yeah
need help? @hallow crystal
need help? @hallow crystal
@snow hornet
These past days I’ve been catching up on old notes so I probably will in a few hours or maybe even minutes haha
This server is so helpful I’m glad I joined cuz it’s free 🥺🥺
for that problem, just work backward using that same equation
Yep!
👍
for that problem, just work backward using that same equation
@snow hornet
Am I supposed to foil next
Ohh I have to square 10 as well ??

But it doesn’t say that in the distance formula
ofc not but its easier that way, dont need to but it helps understand that
Ah to cancel the radical out
u want the total sum inside of the square root
Yea saves time
to be equal to outside
@snow hornet
Wait so I DONT foil?
https://youtu.be/J0m28OW-tH8
This person foiled
ALGEBRA MADE EASY A different way to see distance formula questions is to be given distance and then find an x or y value of a point.
https://youtu.be/XiArEBYMkQk
But this person didn’t 
www.STEADFASTtutoring.com | If you know where one point is -- let's say (4,8) -- and you know one only coordinate of another point -- (-50, ?) -- and you know the distance between the points -- 200 -- here's how to use the distance formula to figure out that missing coordinate!
i dont think u need to use foil
i dont think u need to use foil
@snow hornet
Yea cause
foil is used when ur multiplying two binomials, right?
I guess foiling is only for expanding expressions that’s why
ye
Or am I supposed to foil in certain cases?
u only foil when its like
foil is used when ur multiplying two binomials, right?
@snow hornet
yerp, it’s mostly a polynomials thing
you can foil to decompose a polynomial
(2x+2)(x-5)
Yea like to simplify and expand
(2x+2)(x-5)
@snow hornet
Yea but technically (y-3)^2 = (y-3)(y-3) so i was like
Lol this whole problem just had me like that
Oh I missed ur point
im confused by the problem
U meant to say u only foil when it can’t be squared
its already foiled
thats supposed to be equal to 64 already
Oh my bad I didn’t show u the first image
(y-3)^2 is already in simplest terms
and ye
:0
I thought to find y I’d need to foil it whoops
and then do a lil algebra
and thats how u get x or y
or whatever u were lookin for
But this is the original problem
ye
thats not needed
Welp my first instinct upon seeing it was to foil 😔
should be 11
u see square root 36+(y-3)^2
foil is for breaking down polynomials man
Sn but yea I understand it now lmao
i thought it was -5 @west basin
10^2 = 100
10=sqrt (-6)^2 + (y-3)^2
100-32 = 64
its 36
36 i meant
no
thats what i meant
hes lookin for y or x
he
yes y is 11

I’ve fooled the online ppl once again
they are looking for y
huehuehue
y is 11
oh wait
Lmaoo np
dont confuse foil
Wait so I square both sides... and then I square root both sides again?
we dont want to put them back together
you just perform simple operations til you get your answer
Yea it’d be no point in that
i think you got confused because you didnt put = 10
if you saw the 10 maybe you would of thought to square both sides etc
Hmm perheps
i mean yeah it does because thats how you solve the problem
Wait y-3 is still supposed to be squared right?
then u would get 100=(4-10)^2+(y-3)^2

Lemmie just tell em it’s already in simplest terms
like factors
$64=(y-3)^2$
Star_:
$8=(y-3)$
Star_:
8=y-3
Oh they just said they misread the question lmao
idk why this is so complicated you can do it in your head
👍
idk why this is so complicated you can do it in your head
@west basin
I’m kinda new to it so I wanted to get used to it 😔 plus these are old notes I’m trying to review bc I bombed the quiz whomp whomp


I’ll probably have to move on to the new notes cuz there’s another quiz on Monday ugh
yeah feel free to ask any more questions you have
Thank youu this server has been real helpful
along with cum laude tutoring after school 
@west basin @snow hornet are my notes right so far y’all 
alrighty tyt uwu
the length of each INDIVIDUAL leg will be sqrt(2)*hypotenuse
not the sum
maybe i wasnt clear before
the length of each INDIVIDUAL leg will be sqrt(2)*hypotenuse
@west basin
:0
But I proved what I wrote correct

its 1:1:Sqrt2 ye?
you proved it yes the directly contradicted it below
its 1:1:Sqrt2 ye?
@snow hornet
For the first page?
she wrote hypotenuse multiplied by sqrt2?
you proved it yes the directly contradicted it below
@west basin
huh
there u go
what does n stand for
^
n is length
oh it’s just the variable
yeah
so what i was sayin was like 1:1: sqrt(2) bcuz 1 multiply by sqrt 2 is still sqrt2
oop brb
I don’t get this property 
whats confusing about it
@snow hornet
Like I thought I proved my statement right
But the statement is wrong
what is wrong about what
what statement are you looking at
It’s not L1 + L2 = |2(Hypoténuse)
It’s L1 = |2(Hypotenuse) and L2 = ~2(Hypotenuse) correct?
Then how was I able to prove it right
Or am I tripping and didn’t prove it right lol
^
and the product of them would have no relation ot the sum
16|2 is the length of both legs
32 is the hypotenuse
2(16|2) = 32|2 no?
No
not sqrt(2), radical 2
That’s what the property says
if you really wanna explore this
I didn’t sqrt anything 
if you really wanna explore this
@west basin
actually no I don’t think I do!! 😁😁
Sn lmao
LMAO
R u familiar with like
$x = \frac{32}{\sqrt{2}}$
But I should probably understand it today
Star_:
Oh whats it called
squints
I cant remember what its called rip
$45⁰={sqrt{2}/2}$
KO7S:
$x = \frac{32}{\sqrt{2}}$
@west basin
is x the length?
like how n is the length in the previous image u sent
$45⁰={sqrt{2}/2}$
@snow hornet
Never seen that before 😀
Is that supposed to be a degree
F
anything you type will be put in latex
if you enter a message using dollar signs like that
yeah
@west basin
So these two are the same thing?
the top is the general case
No
the bottom is for your problem
F
The top is just the basic understanding
Ohh the bottom one only applies to triangles is that why
the bottom is the answer to each side on your problem
No
I’m assuming the top one can be applied to other things?
They both apply to triangles
The bottom is the problem tho
The top is basic general info for 45-45-90
the hypotenuse is the product of sqrt(2) and any non-hypotenuse side
therefore the hypotenuse/sqrt(2) will be one of the legs
^
this only applies for triangles with 45-45-90 angle measurements
the hypotenuse is the product of sqrt(2) and any non-hypotenuse side
@west basin
Oh wait is sqrt(2) the same thing as radical 2 aka |2 ? 🤡
yes
Yea.
i dont use |2 tho
because | is also for divides
when you talk about divisors in higher levle math
Yea I just wish there was a radical on my keyboard rip
Star_:
if you learn latex formatting it will make it easier for you
$(32)\sqrt{2}$
MapoTofu:
TeXit 
TeX is extremely popular in math and science
Ohh :00
im a uni math student and i use it a lot

Ight but
I’m gonna fix what I wrote in purple here
you cant just add a sqrt(2) out of nowhere
@west basin
Hold on what did u mean by this
Do I have to put it in parenthesis and multiply?
no
32 is already there
thats the hypotenuse
which means 32 is the product of radical 2 and some number x
Yea paranthesis aren’t needed so wym by that
$32 = \sqrt{2} * x$
Star_:
like you cant just add sqrt(2) to 32 because by definition 32 is already a product of sqrt(2) and another number x where x is the length of a leg
But I thought the property stayed that ?
Meaning I’d have to multiply $n/sqrt2$ in order to get n
you are just restating what i stated
MapoTofu:
yes it does it states the hypotenuse is the product of n and sqrt(2)
@west basin
Wait the : doesn’t mean = ? 😭
32 is the product of n and sqrt(2)
@west basin
Ohh omg that’s the hypotenuse length cuz $(16\sqrt{2})sqrt{2}$ = the hypotenuse ??
MapoTofu:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
lets just restart ok
im going to go over how to find the area
with you
step by step
again
ignore all your writing
I know how to find the area but I’m confused about what the 45-45-90 property is actually stating
alrighty yea let’s restart
ignore all your writing
@west basin
hold on
if we know the hypotenuse is equal to $\sqrt{2} * n$ and 32 is the hypotenuse, then $32 = \sqrt{2} * n$
Star_:
therefore, $\frac{32}{\sqrt{2}} = n$
Star_:
since the area of a triangle is $n^2$ where n is a side length
Star_:
if we know the hypotenuse is equal to $\sqrt{2} * n$ and 32 is the hypotenuse, then $32 = \sqrt{2} * n$
@west basin
and n is the length of each leg correct? Which would be the same since it’s a right triangle?
Actually no, since it’s a 45-45-90 triangle
Star_:
$\frac{32^2}{2} = n^2$
Star_:
square both sides for the area
Yes, area = x^2
$512 = n^2$
Star_:
Yes only one
im using n^2 because it defines the area of a square
Because they are the same length
of how i solved it using the property
So basically there’s just three ways of writing the property?
hypotenuse is equal to $\sqrt{2} * n$
$32 = \sqrt{2} * n$
MapoTofu:
$\frac{32}{\sqrt{2}} = n$
MapoTofu:
MapoTofu:

legit the hypotenuse is equal to sqrt(2)n
if the hypotenuse is already a number
then that number is equal to sqrt(2)n
i cant explain it any simpler
huh
no i dont think its confusing
the hypotenuse is the product of sqrt(2) and a leg length x
when its a number its already in this form
you just divide by sqrt(2) to get the leg length
like i cant explain it simpler
when its a number its already in this form
@west basin
Is 16|2 a number
yeah of course
yes
well yes and no
its actually incorrect for x
but it just so happens it yields a correct area
lol
i didnt even notice that
i was looking at the bottom left
that is area
So it IS a coincidence?
yeah basically
its actually incorrect for x
@west basin
So my answer is wrong?
😧
What did I do wrong
Did I make a mistake in finding the area? The work in purple
actually it does work itself out
i think the problem is the difference in representation
between how i did it
i think if you just stick to your Pythagoras youll be good
kinda sus that the LHS is a scalar while the RHS is a vector
are you sure the arrow's meant to be there
k
$mg \sin(\theta) = F_a \sin(\varphi) \cos(\theta) - F_a \cos(\varphi)\sin(\theta) \ (mg + F_a \cos(\varphi)) \sin(\theta) = F_a \sin(\varphi) \cos(\theta)$
Ann:
hmm
$\tan(\theta) = \frac{F_a\sin(\varphi)}{mg + F_a\cos(\varphi)}$
Ann:
Let me check my identies
This is a nice expression of θ
Usually when I have to find θ with the help of the tangent, I find squares and roots everywhere 
thanks @dark sparrow I understand what you did now
I feel like I am on the wrong bath
because will this is way too hard for a physics problem
ehh
not really
this is for the physics homework
which usually the math is super easy
understanding how to set up the problem is usually the biggest obstacle
also my angle is like 75deg
they are almost never that high
@signal hornet this is a very usual way to find an angle when there are several angles in the system
Oh maybe
Hi, I need some help to determine if these affirmations (or similar ones) are true or false.
hello, do you guys memorise basic identities for trigonometry??
$\trig$
RokettoJanpu:
😮
some identities are worth memorizing
it feels like im memorizing them without knowing why haha
you memorize so you don’t get caught on algebra as much
Hello
Nice
Not sure if I’m in the right group for it, but I’m thinking: could the Po Shen Loh’s method of solving quadratics be related somehow to the normal distribution?
4x+40 = 6x+10
show work
x=15 would be correct
angle sum on a line is: ?
how do I get angle sum?
wdym
thats what y is right:?
they have degrees
...
I dont know
pretty sure you applied this to the previous question you did
where I did 4x+40 = 6x+10?
0
180
so every thing has a 180 on the bottom of it?
wdym
like you want me to find that degree
i want you to apply that,
to set up an equation and then solve for y since you already know x
so 180 to x=15
no
2y*15
no
consider the line AD or CE
and consider the (small) angles on said line
the sum of those angles would = what?
wdym by both
like they all equal 180
the lines intersecting
It's a substraction not a multiplication, my apologies

