#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 220 of 1
if you care a LOT about geometry, then make sure to pay attention a LOT, it's probably going to be like the only geometry math class you'll take throughout all of high school (well assuming your school doesn't offer any more geom courses)
Only geometry course but you will end up doing more geometry in your other courses so it’s important to pay good attention
I think it's a good idea to study as a whole as everything in life can be abstracted into a shape of some sort
Specifically circles and squares/triangles
...
What
I'm speaking probably from an artist background. Everything eventually starts as a shape.
You can literally construct a head with a circle and triangles
What
answer my question then whats a shape
as im going towards higher leveks of sciences
i realize theres nothing known as an explanation
its an infinite deal of nothing
and even after knowing everything we dont know anything
I rather eat ice cream and brownies. 😦 Just look up any tutorial of figure/portrait drawing. The usual start is a circle, lines, then you mark the nose from the mouth/chin with a triangle. The eyes another circle, and you can even do an upside down triangle for the pupil so you can line up the eyelids of the eye.
At least, this is how I do things when I'm proportioning my drawings
Not perfect, but circles, triangles, and rectangles. Looks like Cell or someone wearing a helmet due to the rigid nature, but you see the general construction.
If you were to go very strict, you could probably use the properties of geometry, specifically Triangles and Circles, to get exact measures/proportions
post
So, you can still see the shapes position and how it relates with more 'concrete' aspects of life
There are other mathematical properties attributed in art itself like the Golden Ratio which has Geometry foundations
u guys are gonna be my help for geometry thank god i joined this
i had a rlly bad time in algebra
i got a B in the second quarter and C's in the rest
Oof
@cinder portal Wouldn’t it be easy to review geometry later on?
Maybe an online course or something
Mmmmm maybe? I wouldnt recommend it tho, stick with your hs curriculum, and if you really love it, pursue it in undergrad
Given a 2D image A. The content of the image is the position and orientation of objects in the whole image. The style of the image is the color and smoothness of shapes in a small area. The problem is that the function f(image) is sensitive to the angles of style. How to create a fake image B such that it has both the content and style of A but the style is generalized/normalized with respect to angle
@small raptor thats pretty cool
Are rhombus's parallelograms?
Hmm my only response is I'm unsure of the official definition of a parallelogram. Given a parallelogram ABCD, is it required AB≠CD in order for it to be parallelogram?
Well is a square a parallelogram
For a quadrilateral to be parallelogram it's opposite sides mist be parallel .
no
I think a square is just a rhombus..? Which is a parallelogram?
yes
a square is a special rhombus, which is a special parallelogram
It would be annoying to say "parallelogram or rhombus or rectangle or square" when you are talking about all parallelograms
Yes, that’s the answer
You see this point?
That is the point if you rotated it at 0.4 radian
Do you agree? @summer plume
I do
Adjacent/Hypotenuse?
That is a definition of cos, but not the one I was asking for
What is cos of an angle in an unit circle
Depends on the degrees doesn't it? If it's 30, sqrt3/2. 45, sqrt2/2. 60, 1/2. 90, 0.
Well, that the cos of specific angles
I'm talking about general definition
The cos of an angle in an unit circle
See if you have notes on that
The only thing I could find in refrence to The Cos of an angle in an unit circle from my note and my book was the section talking about Circular Functions. Where it says Cos s = x and that later leads into specific angles and the connection of x^2 + y^2 = 1 to cos^2 s + sin^2 s = 1
If you're meaning to tell me that I take that function and plug things in, then why is it 0.9 and not just 9? Because the radians are spaced between two-tenths?
Um
The cos of an angle in an unit circle
You take a point, and rotate it for theta radian
Then the y value of the final point is the sin(theta)
The x value of the final point is cos(theta)
no, it's $i=I_{max}\sin(2\pi ft)$
EpicGuy4227:
Look at the bottom the cos of an angle is the bottom of the triangle like the x axis
You see how it’s at 9
That’s why it’s 9
So just look at the .4 mark and look at the x axis
by the looks of it
it's not 9
but .9
aka 0.9
but written in that nasty no-leading-zero format
no, it wouldn't make much sense to be 9 because it's a unit circle and so the thing is definitely less than 1
"fraction" and "less than 1" aren't synonyms!!!!!!!!
How am I supposed to do this?
I tried expanding cos and sin but it ain't working
Cant get rid of the weird thetas and 4√2
And oh btw
You're supposed to find general solutions for the given equation
Hint: Let x = 5(theta)+2
You will see
Got it!
Thank you so much wolf!
A quadratic was formed
And that gave me the solution
👍
J’ai une question ?
J’arrive pas à trouver l’angle ω
J’ai
-> cos ω=−√5
->sinω= (√5)/2
Vu qu’il n’est pas dans la table trigo je rame un peu .. merci de votre réponses à l’avance

Voici ma forme algébrique
Du coup je me demande est ce que je réécris pas la forme algébrique sous la forme 1-(6/4)i je pense que c’est pas ça qui faut faire
J’ai un doute
c'est comme dire que $\frac{1+2}{3+4}=\frac 13 + \frac24$
emeric75:
multiplier par le conjugué du dénominateur ça marche plutôt bien
ça a l'air ok
équation cartésienne de quoi?
Mettre sous forme cartésienne la forme algébrique
J’ai fait ça concrètement
Mais il faut déterminer l’angle
ah j'étais en mode wtf
cartésien/algébrique c'est la même chose pour moi lel
ok ok....
Du coup faut déterminer l’angle
Pour avoir x= r cos (a) et y = r sin (a)
Sauf que √5 apparement n’as pas d’angle 🤔🤔
ok je revérifiais les modules et tout...
nan c'est juste ta division à la fin qui est foireuse
Et où v
$$\frac{-3}{5} = \frac{3\sqrt{5}}{5}\cos(\theta)$$ $$\frac{-3}{5}\frac{5}{3\sqrt{5}} = \frac{3\sqrt{5}}{5}\frac{5}{3\sqrt{5}}\cos(\theta)$$ $$\cos(\theta)=\frac{-1}{\sqrt 5}$$
emeric75:
jsp comment t'as fait, mais les fractions dans les fractions c'est pas trop ça j'ai l'impression
et pareil pour le sinus
Ah oui je suis debile ...
Bah je l’ai pas fait à la main je l’ai fait de tête
Merci

yo
@mild cargo
am i allowed to @he1pers?
help me out here ples
<@&286206848099549185>
Do you know euler's formula
oh
look at the channel
I just thought of that
Don't think Euler is relevant to this
you can use it
Yes, but using it you can get the result really easily
if you know it then do that
it's much easier than the alternative method
$\sin^2 x = \frac{1 - \cos 2x}{2}$
hegel:

hegel:
kay
ye 
do you know the sum of angles identity
$\sin(\alpha + \beta) = \sin \alpha \cos \beta + \cos \alpha \sin \beta$
hegel:
yes
so try plugging in x for alpha and 2x for beta
if u knew demoivre's theorem we could do more but you probably do not if this is an alg II class

yes i know
but the thing is that sin(2x) expands to 2 sin x cos x
and cos 2x expands to 1 - 2sin^2 x
if you follow this through you'll see : p
eulers formula plis 

ban em 
im actually in college but my credits didnt cary over so i gotta redo all the shit i sorta forgot
hegel:
RIP
again euler's theorem is the correct way to do this
but i dun think you know it
never learned that
anyway $\sin 2x = 2\sin x \cos x$
hegel:
so $\sin 2x \cos x = 2\sin x \cos x \cos x = 2\sin x \cos^2 x = 2\sin x(1 - \sin^2 x) = 2\sin x - 2\sin^3 x$
hegel:
u see where the sin^3 comes in now
and then for $\sin x \cos 2x = \sin x (1 - 2\sin^2 x) = \sin x - 2\sin^3 x$
hegel:
sorry this explanation is basically me throwing shit at the wall but im really tired and there's no good intuitive explanation for this property T . T
its just hard to follow
ye
friends
im having to calculate the rectangular coordinates when given polar coordinates. easy enough right?
but my question is, if R = 25 m/sec squared, do i use 5
uh
i know its probably obvious.. i think its a trick question
at 210 degrees. That's an important bit of information.
why
yes
ah ok
wasnt sure if it was a trick q
i guess the answer will remain in that unit then?
for vectors x and y
im super new to this shit lol.. still studying algebra 2 but this other class is having us do basic trig
yes
yw
:| @dire rampart
heck u
@dark sparrow whats the best way to convert a negative value to a degree if the degrees are going counter clockwise
??
So like, I got -74 for the angle , because it had a negative x coordinate
But the angle was really 106 degrees
Know what I’m sayin?
Mm they're not the same angle, probably you didn't need to "convert" it but to find its supplementary: 106+74=180
Ahhh
@formal bolt in this class we are taking the angle from counter clockwise
Dunno if that matters
I’m pretty confused tho 🤔😂
The angle I was looking for was definitely 106 but my calculator told me -74
180-74 eh
Did you evaluate it through arctan ?
Yeah
That’s what my textbook said to do
But maybe the example problem didn’t involve a Resultant vector ending in the negative x plane
I’m thinking that’s why I got a weird answer
Positive counterclockwise angles is common
Also arctan has (conventionally) codomain ]-pi/2,pi/2[, if it is the inverse function of tan(x) restricted to ]-pi/2,pi/2[
But tan(x) is pi-periodic so you can add pi to your solution and still find an angle with the same tangent. You have to decide which one to choose from the situation
I can’t say I understand but thx for trying to explain hehe
I’m brand new to trig. Actually still doing the beginnings of algebra 2, but my other class has us doing some trig stuff
X is 10 degrees right?
Someone posted this on another Discord and asked for help
Was wondering if x is 10
he assumed it was 20 and it worked too
Wondering which is actually correct
If someone answers please ping me
#shitpost
I found the problem pretty interesting tho
the one posted by olnir is a bit different to LAA tho
welp I'm not good enough, anyone got hints for this one? (btw a geometry program gives us evidence for the value of x)
oh ye looking back
$f$ is the solution to the equation $\sin(e+f)=2\cos\left(f+\frac{a-e}2\right)\sin\left(\frac{a+e}2\right)$ isn't the actual general solution
EpicGuy4227:
EpicGuy4227:
then substituting the values from @queen hawk 's problem, guessing x=20, some manipulations later (using double angle formula for sin, cos(90-x)=sin(x)), I got that x=20 is indeed the solution.
we can also see that a,b,c,d,f determine the quadrangle, and that the solution to the generalized problem is the solution to sin(a+b+c)sin(f)sin(c+d)=sin(c)sin(a+b+f)sin(b+c+d)
I don't understand anything
well, you need to be familiar with the sine rule to get started. You'll also need to do a bit of algebra to follow along with me
kek
ye a geometry solution would be interesting, anyone got one for olnir's problem?
Would systems of equations help? Naming two different, maybe three different angles
Just an idea
Actually nop
Another idea i had was inscribing it in a circle. Dont havr pencil or paper around me
you'll find that only using the identities that only involve adding angles won't get you anywhere
Ah i figured as much
My last thought would probably be the ratio between 20/60 and 10/70
what do you mean?
this is a continued fraction, it "appears in itself"
hence the x=1/(2+x)
what language is that
Hindi written in English letters

Imagine Chinese language being written in English letters .
wo shi fa guo ren
dui bu qi, wo de zhong wen bu hao

tu parles chinois tuong ?! o.O
a tiny little bit
Illegal Google translate
Imagine french written with Chinese letters tho
Or just ping @upper karma because only he understand
its just slangs in a diff lang
@worthy root chinese language can be written in "english" language
hmm
Letters*
it's not really a slang lionel
i literally know these slangs
romanized characters
It's a bad word
Bhai means brother
han yu ping yin is basically what you're thinking of
it just includes the tones for each word
isnt chutiye a slang
hahahahahaha
@olive solar l y n c h e d
colo the fastest speedrun strat is just
wear muslim attire in public and say you eat beef
i'll stop i don't want to get obliterated by mods
But the words u said were quiet inappropriate.
idc
You are immature
lol
anyways, this isn't really #geometry-and-trigonometry
I used to say these words when I didn't knew what they meant. You are immature
#bot
Life Speedrun - lynch%

lol emeric
Rreee
Is there any possiblity to get hexagonal and squared 2d grid both on the same grid? (it's so diffuclt to form a proper question about that in english for me)
It would look bad, wouldn't it
I don't know, I try to imagine that
I think I might have misunderstood the question
You need a grid, and that grid should be both hexagonal and squared at the same time?
Why would you need that?
just for a game idea
I'm just curious is it possible
it's nicer
I'm looking for other solutions
We can deform a hexagonal shape, but squares must be the squares
I killed the conversation ;_;

;3;
Can the squares be diagonal?
For example, I just made this:
into this:
So the hexagonal grid is oriented from left to right, but the square grid is turned 90 degrees or so
The squares can be 1/4 of the size to make it seem denser
This is another option, if you want the squares aligned: Edit - Should have made the squares another color lol
could anyone help me with understanding how they got the lengths of the line segments? i.e. how they got to AF = s - b
Call the line segments from |AF| to |EA| counterclockwise d,e,f,g,h,i.
d+e+f=g+h+i=f+g+h=d+e+i=d+i+h=e+f+g=s.
Remember b was h+i and s=d+i+h. this means d = s - b.
Hi, so I'm working on a word problem where I use a pleasure wheel (Like a Ferris Wheel, but made out of wood and turned by hand) to answer the questions below. One of them asks, "The path that each passenger takes is circular. Give the equation for the path using x and y - coordinates." Now, I thought it would be the equation y = A * cos(Bx + C) +D, but later I'm asked, "Determine an equation containing trigonometric functions that models the path taken by a rider." Making me think I had it the other way around. How do I answer the first question? If anybody could help......
a^2
Is there a way to calculate the area of a polygon given it's 4 points?
The solutions I have found online have the limitation where if the polygon is not simple, it is incalculable and values at 0
which is what I'm trying to solve for because the ultimate goal is to see if the lines are collinear
If I use anything with slope involved, it's very easy to get errors because of Nan numbers
could ya'll help me approach this?
im trying to find a possible solution with law of cosines but im kinda lost
Well can you find any extra information about the diagram
i know that AD+BC=280
I made an equation with law of cosines and simplified it a ton but it has three variables in it that i cant substitute for anything
ok so let x = AD and y = BC
$\begin{cases} x + y = 280 \ x^2 + 180^2 - 360x \cos(\alpha) = y^2 + 180^2 - 360y \cos(\alpha) \end{cases}$
Ann:
are those the equations you made @potent mango
yeah I just made AD = a and BC = B
ok doesn't matter
watch what happens when you attempt to rearrange the second equation for cos(α)
$x^2 - 360x \cos(\alpha) = y^2 - 360y \cos(\alpha) \ x^2 - y^2 = 360(x-y)\cos(\alpha) \ \cos(\alpha) = \frac{x^2 - y^2}{360(x-y)} = \frac{x+y}{360} = , ?$
Ann:
woah dang i simplified the x^2-y^2 wrong i see that now
bruh so its just 280/360
7/9
😃

,rotate -90
$x^2 + y^2 - 6x + 8y + 24 = 0$ defines a circle in $\bbR^2$
Ann:
from that, you can deduce the possible range of values for $\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$
Ann:
and from that, the possible range of values for $f(\sqrt{x^2 + y^2})$, where $$f(t) = \frac85(2 \cos^2(t) - 3 \sin(t))$$
Ann:
Ive tried that
Maybe its my inability to complete the solution from here on but
This wasnt exactly working..
Well i got at that stage of factoring it
But then i didnt know what to do
Sin can vary from (-1 to1)
So to maximise the stuff under the bracket
It should be one of the extremes
But i dont think thats right
Ann you BIG bren
6
How can I prove this
Should I prove that x+y=w+z=180 first .
Then use the axiom
sure
Ok
like, look at the picture
360
there you go
I got a feel
How to do it thank you
I told I got a feel about how to do it
Sorry my English is bad
hello! I'm minutes new here and idk if this is the right discord or channel to ask for help about some measurements 😅
go ahead
alright 😅
I'm spending my vacation time creating some papercraft figures.
right now I had this whim to put a nose to a flat square face. you will get it with the image.
so my issue is that if I put this piece it should look in a side view as a right triangle, but the paper piece has to be folded to fit in that triangle gap i made for the face.
Right now have the measures of the gap and how it would look in the side view, yet I still don't know how to get the other faces of this pyramid.
What do you mean getting the other faces of the pyramid?
well the nose would look like a pyramid.... right?
I imagine if you created a 3D object to insert, yeah, a pyramid. Alternatively, just fold a square/rect into two triangles to insert.
Although, that wouldn't resolve the bottom nose. 🤔
In any case, if you can measure the cutout of the nose, you have then the base, and sides.
As for construction... 🤷
Probably requires a long rectangle that can form into the pyramid face and a bottom piece to fold into a square
which part do you mean by "cutout of the nose"? (sorry, still not as knowledgeful of the English language as I would like to)
... the area of the square that is cut out for the nose insert
👌
Hey @obsidian oxide , the section of the circular garden is just an 80 degree slice of the whole circle. You can see from the diagram that your circle has a radius of 13 feet. You can use the formula for the area of a circle with a radius of 13 feet to find the total area of the garden. Then, realize that your "slice" of the garden is only 80 degrees. Since we divide a circle into 360 degrees, that means that your slice will cover 80/360, or 2/9 of the circle, which means that the area of the slice you are looking for will be 2/9 of the area of the entire circular garden.
thanks
no problem
Just asking if geometry of class 9 and 10 is used in class 11 @upper karma
Anyways how can I do it
I mean there is less information right ?
Any good construction that I can make
Leave I got this
Done
@dark sparrow ann isgeometry used in precalc and calculus .
yes
Ok thank
So should I learn all the chapters of geometry
Or sone specific
Some*
@dark sparrow
if you try to cherry-pick, you'll inevitably miss something crucial
and it'll come back and bite you in the ass later
Ok
Lol
Geometry is easy will do it in 10days
I thought the same when starting algebra but algebra took 3 months
Let's see wish me luck . That I found it easy
I have learnt a little geometry in my class 10
So I think I will make it
😎
the rabbit hole is deep.
I hope so
I have done it in class 10 Ok for passing the exam but not intensively
Let's see
,w graph y=e^x
,w graph y=x
,w graph y=e^x and graph y=x
label the opposite, adjacent, and hypotenuse sides of the triangle
use that to determine which trig ratio is appropriate to use here
Im just too dumb...
😂
welp I labelled these
just forgot this formula...
aint it..
Tan(31°42' = a/58
so that would equal... 35.8 right?
Hmmm
I got something else
Your equation seems right tho
How are you plugging it into the calculator
@night wing
58tan(31°42')
Aight yea you're right, my bad
My phone calculator has the radians button visible when I'm in degrees so I got confused
So bearings are just more specific directions
You have NESW
Your starting direction
Then you put your amount of degrees
Then you put direction you want to turn that amount of degrees into
So if I was facing pure north and wanted to look 45° to the west
I'd do N45°W
Does that make sense?
Now typically your starting direction is always North or South and your ending direction is always East or West
Yea sure 1 sec
[N/S] [number of degrees you want to turn] [E/W]
u dont need a calc for this right?
lol I have like one last but dont wanna overload u
Hold on
It would be
N35°W is that right?
west | left, east | right
to b?
Yea
East
Sweet
So now we gotta establish our amount of degrees east we need to turn
How many degrees so you think we need to turn
Sweeeeeet
So your first answer is N135°E
That's exactly right
Now do the same thought process but let's start at South
ok
and this is for A?
Because A in the corner is that just saying it is the same as B? or is it 90 degrees?
A is the origin
can you simplify sqrt(1+1/t^2)?
Lionel:
cant i multiply and divide by t^2?
Yes
so if i do that ill get
$(t^2(1+1/t^2)/t^2)$
Lionel:
wont i
Yes
now the above expression is just
$(t^2+t^2/t^2)$
Lionel:
the numerator thus becomes (t^2+1)
dosent it?
as t^2 and t^2 get cancelled out
agree?
Yes
now after seeing the fraction it is now $(t^2+1)/t^2$
Lionel:
isnt it?
Yes
Lionel:
Yes
Yes
now suppose we have something like
$a+a/c$
Lionel:
Yes
isnt the expression same like $a(1+1/c)$
Lionel:
agreed?
sure?
Yes
np mann
it was comparatively easy to what you were solving tjo
A lot
you became braindesd or what
Yea
lol np man
Actually when i think about it now
I feel like a stupid i got stuck
It was so obvious
lol
Reee bro @restive wren your name reminded of my school bully 
Yup
Yeah it's a ninth grade ncert
Any hint legends
?
Taime has come to poong hulpers
U got ans?
Take angle PQR as 2x and PSR as 2y
That's what I did
U got it
I forgot the exterior angle theorem
Yea
Happens bro....
@restive wren can you change your name it really makes me angry
Bro its my name... and i cant change it
Lol
Maybe we cam be friend
?
I'm gonna post this in math help
half angle identies
You can keep it here @somber nest
please avoid posting the same thing in multiple channels
okay one moment
what's the general solution for tan(theta) = 0?
0
what are other solutions?
solutions as in references angles or?? not sure what you mean
theta has infinitely many solutions,
eg tan (pi) is also 0
you first need to find an expression that covers all the solutions of tan(theta) = 0
ie. -pi, 0 , pi, 2pi, 3pi ... etc
the choices show can provide some hints,
kpi OR 2kpi where K is an integer
one of those would be the correct choice, the other skips solutions
are you still struggling?
err, I need steps on where to begin
I can't just go straight to conclusion, I don't understand this
so to solve for ALL x in the question, you need to find ALL solutions to tan(theta) = 0
so solve for all quadrants?
Zerpo, how far are you on Trigonometry?
its like
tan(0) = 0
tan(pi) = 0
tan(2pi) = 0
...
in general
tan(n * pi) = 0 where n is the subset of all integers
your solution has to solve for EVERY case
my Professor uses reference angles to solve problems usually
but in the specific question you gave it asks you to solve for the general case
do you see how "tan(n * pi) = 0 where n is the subset of all integers" gives you all the solutions?
to solve for x, we set 3x + pi/6 = 0? subtract pi/6, divide both sides by 3
no
x = -pi/18
that only gives 1 solution
to find all solutions of x, equate it to all solutions of theta listed above
Zerpo do you understand what we're saying regarding there being multiple solutions
if it's in quadrant 2, pi - reference angle. if it's in quadrant 3, pi + reference angle. if it's in quadrant 4, 2pi - reference angle
like this
???
sort of, but you also have to consider that the angle could be beyond just the 4 quadrants
more than 2pi
eg tan ( 9001 pi) = 0
it's asking for just tan though, why we need 4 solutions. we need 4 solutions in a question like this https://gyazo.com/9b8d8e6a7eed288fe1f93c9940816e4e
when range is [0,2pi] we find 4 solutions
that is bounded between 0 and 2pi
the question you posted is for all real numbers
(which is infinitely many)
the choices only have positive or negative pi/18
the question says: " on all real numbers"
I'm hella confused
this means x can be anything
x can be -235823989234
wait is this a different problem
the first stage is understanding the general solution of tan(theta) = 0
the next step is pretty simple
for instance u got the solution x = pi/18
but I could put in x = pi/9 and that also works
so x can be something other than just pi/18
actually pi/9 doesnt work but you get what i mean
can you do this on a whiteboard
everyone have different techiques
drawing won't really help
I just don't understand you guys
have you learned the unit circle yet?
reference angle here would be 0
but you are also going around the unit circle infinitely many times
tan is positive in quadrant 1 and 3
you might want to understand the unit circle first
its kind of hard to visualize angles larger than 90 degrees without triangles
*with triangles
i.e
tan(101 pi), tan(504 pi), tan( any integer * pi) all equal 0
and would result in different x values when you equate it to (3x + pi/6)
Is anyone here familiar with directed angles?
the same applies to tan(x) = 0
x = 0 + 2kpi OR x = pi + 2kpi
and to solve for tan(3x + pi/6) you just substitute the x above with 3x + pi/6
(which simplifies to just kpi)
yep
Okay
So basically a quadrilateral ABXY is cyclic iff $\measuredangle XAY = \measuredangle XBY$
Big10:
(Where \measuredangle stands for directed angle)
But I'm not sure how to prove the $\measuredangle XAY = \measuredangle XBY \implies$ ABXY is cyclic
Big10:
Or rather that $\angle XAY + \angle XBY = 180^\circ$ or $\angle XAY = \angle XBY$
Big10:
Directed angle just means positive for counterclockwise between holding XA still and rotating AY and negative for clockwise direction.
So if XAY = XBY that means that in the quadrilaterall ABXY you've got two opposite angles that are in the opposite direction but have the same angle.
So not only is it cyclic - its also a parrallelogram
What?
I'm talking about directed angles mod 180°
Still applies homie
Dude
No
That's wrong
@upper karma
Kk
Look
When <)XAY=<)XBY then we have that <XAY = <XBY+n*180
Then either n is 0 or 1
So suppose n is 0 then <XAY = <XBY
Now suppose that <XAY = <XBY + 180
Then those points lie opposite
Nah homie
Cuz then
<XAY = -<XBY
Cuz thats how directed angles work
What?
Well <XAY = 180-<XBY
Saaame shitskiees
What do you even mean
Do you know how directed angles work?
Yeah fam, just work on it intuitively
<XAY+ 180 = 180-<XAY, so if <XAY = <XBY+180 = 180-<XBY = <XBY - clearly a contradiction imho
How do you even get the first line?
@upper karma
Think
Intuitively
From the heart
The first line is already wrong
@upper karma
How man?
Because that implies that <)XAY=-<)XAY
And that isn't always true
And you're mixing up directed angles with normal ones
Naaah
Didn't I already answer this?
I did Sin x/1, but that wasn't the answer they were looking for
Yea sin x should be right
Namington:
poorly phrased, in any case
after proving congruency in (i), which angles in the 2 triangles are equal?
Well what do you want to learn for? @upper karma
Like, for which contest
You have already finished other intro/intermediate series books?
Because in that case AoPS Vol 1 would be kind of a waste imo
Well enough for what?
From what I've heard it's like AMC 10 geo
Don't think there is much difference
There is some geo stuff in AoPS Vol 2 but way more in Vol 1
I guess for the basics ¯_(ツ)_/¯
@upper karma you can learn from ncert if you want and practice problems from aops v1
aops v1 is availabe on the internet
Google it
yes
Serach on google ncert class 9 and clas 10 do the geometry
Ncert is always a good book and is referred by evryone here in INDIA
well\
intutive undesrtanding is important too
And reading aops v1 dont get him, that intututive feeking of concepts
feeling*
I know man
But before solving some problem of high level its always reassonable to solve some basic and mid level
He is knew too the geomtry
new*
aops v1 is very basic
But the theory ?
For example lets say he is studying congruence . AOps v1 will strictly define whats congruence but when he will be asked to solve some real world problems on Conguence he will donnt know how to use the rules he studied
That why intutive feel of concept is very important
EULER TBH aops will be good decision
INTRO TO GEO
I am doing ncert and aops v1
It depends on the person
yea
You needs to start seeing some basic example like this
Anyways using the peoperty of the exterior angle can help you solve the problem
Also use the fact that angles of triangle sum too 180deg
and i have given you enough hint
yEA
THATS what i like about aops wording is awlays clear
the inro book will give you the capacity tooo do so
@eager pendant I better recommend you to read the preface of the aops v1
Its clearly written its for student who have a basic knowledge of the subject and they want to develop problem solving skills
hi jazza
Hi jasi
hi
i have invented a way to calculate coordinates of point of intersectino of 2 lines without using parametric equation
now i am attemping to do it on a plane but am having a hard time
using similar method
What's the method you use for two lines
i have illustrated it here
please take a peak
yes
there are 3 cases
slope are opposite
slopes are equal
Yea I'm very confused
let me break it down
Well if the slope are equal they can either intersect 0 times or a infinite amount of times
If it's a linear line that is
Gotcha
can u go back to the drawing board
And are we talking linear equations?
Ok



