#geometry-and-trigonometry

1 messages Β· Page 179 of 1

white harness
#

Yes (black).

upper karma
#

second if

#

no

#

ur first if is the red part

#

ur second the red

white harness
#

No.

upper karma
#

yes

#

actually, x < 0 && y >= 0 is bad (bot left)

#

the discontinuos lane should be changed with the continous

white harness
#

The rendering is reversed. Yes.

upper karma
#

yes

#

on y axe

#

YEAH

#

I DID

#

FFS

#

OMGGGGGGGGGGG

#

idk why 225.00002

#

uwu

white harness
#

Rounding mistake (don't panic, you are using float 32bits).

upper karma
#

asjkvgfasljdbvhsdobv

#

im

#

so

#

fckin

#

happy

#

tomorrow i will try to do on the correct order

#

but basically

#

is to reverse the sorted list (?)

#

yes XD

#

it is reversing XD

white harness
#

Reverse the rendering with (x, -y).

white harness
#

@upper karma .

upper karma
#

im resting :P

white harness
#

Don't forget (x, -y).

upper karma
#

ye ye

#

dont worry :P

#

tyvm PP

#

^^

hard gale
#

Dem DAT ordering (it's kinda logical in a computer tho, kek me)

outer ginkgo
elder vale
#

Whats graphing a boundary line mean again?

glossy dawn
#

pretty sure it means the > < >= <= thing

#

so y >= 3x + 2

#

you draw a thicc line on the line 3x +2

#

the line itself being the boundary

bright elbow
#

Is my formula correct?

#

Oh shoot mb wrong channel

wraith solstice
#

i was working with centri acceleration why are the angles equal?

keen aspen
#

Does the v represent velocity?

twin prawn
#

The angles are equal because the tangent velocity vector is always perpendicular to the position vector

wild hamlet
#

each arrow is rotated by 90 degrees so their adjoining angle would be the same

echo star
#

can anyone here help me with my homework?

upper karma
#

Considering it's a math server, probably

echo star
#

sooooo number 39.)

#

just confusing af

#

i asked a previous server and it doesnt make sense how the answer book says its 16

#

how did the book get 16

#

if its the answer key, it has to be correct right? unless its wrong.... then ive been scammed like 2 hours

#

of mai lyfe

#

<@&286206848099549185> i need Help~~

drowsy heron
#

@echo star The solution is correct. Let me explain.

echo star
#

ok

drowsy heron
#

From the picture, ABE = EBF

#

Therefore, ABF = ABE+ABF = ABF + ABF = 2 * ABE

#

But ABF =7b-24, and ABE=2b

#

So, (7b-24) = 2 * (2b)

#

Did you arrive at this equation?

#

@echo star

echo star
#

something like that

#

i think

drowsy heron
#

What is the value of b?

echo star
#

u and this other guy is helping

#

he said this is the equation

drowsy heron
#

I think that equation is incorrect.

#

Either that, or there’s a miscommunication.

echo star
#

ok so which equation should i be doing

drowsy heron
#

Why would we need a not-equals? Sounds more like a miscommunication than a mistake.

#

(7b-24) = 2 * (2b)

#

Note the β€œ2 *”

echo star
#

so is it 7b-24=4b?

drowsy heron
#

Yeah.

#

Do you understand how I got this equation?

echo star
#

not really :c

#

whered u get the (2b)

drowsy heron
#

From the question

#

ABE=2b

echo star
#

then whered u get 2*

drowsy heron
#

See what I wrote above.

#

From the picture, ABE = EBF
Therefore, ABF = ABE+ABF = ABF + ABF = 2 * ABE
But ABF =7b-24, and ABE=2b
So, (7b-24) = 2 * (2b)

#

Copied down here.

echo star
#

ok sooo

#

from 7b-24=4b where to go from there

#

b=-8 or 8?

drowsy heron
#

There’s a single solution for b.

echo star
#

hmmmm

#

im confusedd

drowsy heron
#

So... you’re saying the solutions to the equation are b=-8 and b=8, right?

echo star
#

one of them

drowsy heron
#

Well... have you figured out which?

echo star
#

-8? right

drowsy heron
#

Just try plugging the numbers in πŸ˜…

echo star
#

8

#

ok so 8

#

then wat

drowsy heron
#

Ok. Do you understand how I got the equations?

echo star
#

yeah i get it

drowsy heron
#

Oh wait.

#

I made a typo in my equation.

#

Sorry.

echo star
#

wat is it

drowsy heron
#

From the picture, ABE = EBF
Therefore, ABF = ABE+EBF = ABE + ABE = 2 * ABE
But ABF =7b-24, and ABE=2b
So, (7b-24) = 2 * (2b)

#

Edited the second line.

#

That must have been confusing πŸ˜…πŸ˜‘

rose reef
echo star
#

ok so then what thoooo

#

i got 8

drowsy heron
#

@echo star So, now we have the value of b. We want to to find EBF. But we know EBF=ABE. Do you know how to find ABE?

#

@rose reef I’d suggest asking in one of the question rooms πŸ˜… sorry.

#

@echo star Do you understand?

echo star
#

trynna comprehend hold up

rose reef
#

oky

echo star
#

u plug 8 into the b in 2b?

#

wait

#

16

#

=/

#

lol

#

ok

#

uhhh

#

thx man

drowsy heron
#

Yup.

#

:)

echo star
#

@drowsy heron wait one more thing

#

with 41 how do u set it up

#

i just need that

#

nvm nvm

#

got it

desert quail
#

Can someone help me with analytic geometry?

keen aspen
#

Sure

cold plaza
#

if you have a circle in the xy plane of the 3 dimensional space. (including z axis)
and plot a height point projecting upward from the midpoint of all pairs of points in the circle. and the height is equal to the distance between the points on the circle.

how would the resultant shape/curve/surface look like?

torn goblet
#

it'll look like a worm hole

#

those boom tubes in justice league unlimited

cold plaza
#

shit I thought it was a cone

torn goblet
#

oh damn ur right

#

i'm gonna go revaluate my life

cold plaza
#

daaaamn im smart

#

im not 100% sure tho is if any PhDs wanna authoritatively answer, that'd be great

torn goblet
#

tbh i don't know, i just guessed what came to mind at the time.

#

loool

cold plaza
#

man i thought of a technique to show its a cone

torn goblet
#

wormholes are pretty

cold plaza
#

yeah. i wanna go inside one

cold plaza
#

here's a related problem... if you take a fixed point on a circle, and draw lines out to all other points on the circle... and then you connect all the midpoints of all lines... do you get a circle?

#

sometimes I wish I was good at art

white harness
#

Image please.

cold plaza
white harness
#

Yes, the result is a circle.

cold plaza
#

why

white harness
#

Homothety.

cold plaza
#

whoa thats advanced

#

could you please verify my question posted at like 40 min ago? the one with xyz

#

more like 48 min ago

white harness
#

It will have a volume.

cold plaza
#

but the volume of a cone?

white harness
#

Sorry, it can't have one.

cold plaza
#

so its just a surface then right. Its the surface of a cone right?

errant ether
#

I don't think it can be a cone. Consider the curve drawn out by taking the midpoints of a set of parallel chords down the circle. The midpoints form a straight line in the xy plane and I believe a semicircle in 3d space, which doesn't lie entirely on a cone. In fact I'd guess the surface is a hemisphere but I'm not really sure

cold plaza
#

hmm maybe come up with a function of the distance between the end points of the parallel chords... then we apply calculus to see if its changing linearly or not

#

that would help

#

for a unit circle centered in the origin (polar coordinates) the height of each parallel chord that's parallel to the y axis is 2 sin(theta)

#

so yeah... i guess this shows it cant be a cone? because the slant of the cone increases linearly right?

errant ether
#

yeah the gradient of a function describing a cone is linear

cold plaza
#

knew there was something wrong with my cone hypothesis

#

wait acutally

#

shouldn't I be finding the function in rectangular coordinates instead?

#

because varying theta isn't like, uh, smoothly going across the x axis

#

and what I want to analyse is how the height changes as I smoothly go across the x axis

#

fuck I have like boring math homework but this shit is just pulling me in

errant ether
#

I went about it by considering displacement from the diameter

#

A chord parallel to and at a displacement x from a diameter forms a right triangle with the radius from its end on the circle to the center of the circle, the line from its center to the center of the circle, and half its own length. Half its own length is also the length to its midpoint from its end, we'll call it h. Then h^2 + x^2 = r^2, where h = z is the height, so we have a circle in the xz plane (or semicircle over the bounds of x). Consider the set of all sets of parallel chords as the rotation of a set of parallel chords. A set of parallel chords draws out a semicircle and a rotation of semicircles forms a hemisphere.

#

Now this could be complete nonsense, not sure lol

#

where blue is some random chord and red is a diameter

cold plaza
#

yeah no im still processing the " hence we have a semicircle in the xz plane" part

#

my visualization skills are pathetic

errant ether
#

gotcha, it's difficult to wrap your head around this a lot of the time lol

#

assuming again of course I'm not making it more difficult by being nonsensical

cold plaza
#

yeah this is kinda what I was saying (about a function with rectangluar coordinates)

#

ok so correct me if I'm wrong

#

but x^2 + h^2 = r^2

#

dh/dx = - (x/h) = - (x/ sqrt(r^2 - x^2))

#

so since h changes non-linearly with respect to x

#

its not a cone

errant ether
#

yep

cold plaza
#

yeah I like your proof

#

makes sense to me

#

honestly I was inspired of asking all this due to a 3Blue1Brown video

#

O_O

errant ether
#

not a bad place to be inspired lol I should watch more of his vids myself

cold plaza
#

yeah I was searching for like some meaning/purpose behind all these advanced mathematical definitions and their implications.. I seem to have gotten it back now. MAYBE TOPOLOGY ISN'T A COMPLETE WASE OF TIME

#

just maybe

errant ether
#

lol

white harness
#

Assuming the radius is one.

#

$$
h = x\tan(\arccos(x))
$$.

charred spearBOT
unique tulip
#

Someone helppppop

#

😒

umbral snow
#

@unique tulip
What's the x and y intercept of 2x + 3y - 13 = 0?

crystal edge
#

Hello!
I have this and know it works

So I want to a point along a vector. I have (x0,y0) to (x1,y1)
Distance is SQRT( SQ(x0-x1)+SQ(y0-y1))
Basic Trig. 
So if I want to find a point distance Q along this line I get
Ratio = Q/d
Then I use that to find point using
xn = (1-ratio)x0 + x1*ratio
Same for y.

How does this work? I did take vector geometry so I should know, just need a refresher ie. Don't go too much in detail.

cunning mist
#

Hi, is there a way to know that a face of a polygon is pointing in the wrong direction? (inward a surface)

#

I have some polygons displaying correctly and some flipped

#

I need to matematically invert the flipped faces

white harness
#

Cross product.

cunning mist
#

how would I use the cross product?

#

the blue part is facing inward

white harness
#

Let A, B, C be your points. Then $$\overrightarrow{AB}\wedge\overrightarrow{AC}$$ is a vector.

charred spearBOT
white harness
#

OpenGL ?

cunning mist
#

Unity, but the problem is that my mesh is converted from step (catia) to polygon using open cascade~

#

I can't fix it manually

white harness
#

Is it only the blue part ?

cunning mist
#

this problem occurs sometimes only

#

the blue part is only an example

white harness
#

You can choose a point inside the object. Compute the cross product then compute the dot product if the sign is positive then change points otherwise leave it unchanged.

cunning mist
#

a point inside the object? like the center of the bounding box?

white harness
#

Yes.

cunning mist
#

would that work for a non convex mesh?

white harness
#

No.

#

The best solution is to generate the right mesh.

cunning mist
#

yes

#

that's the problem hehe

#

I could also convert a non convex mesh to a sequence of convex meshes

#

and then do what you suggested before

white harness
#

Another way to fix it is to have one good vector toward the outside and then by recursion check the neighbours. But the non-convexity problem remains.

cunning mist
#

thanks anyway

white harness
#

You are welcome.

cunning mist
#

do you have any idea how physX checks for collisions of non convex meshes?

white harness
#

No idea.

cunning mist
#

that could do the trick hehe

wild hamlet
#

That moment when the teacher says abs(sin(x))<=1 for all x

#

:)

#

you woulda thout srub

zenith cobalt
wild hamlet
#

would that 6.828 be 4+2sqrt(2)?

zenith cobalt
#

the quadratic equals -4+2sqrt(2) and -4-2sqrt(2). I'm kinda just wondering how the single x = -1.172 translates to the y of both intersections, and the -6.828 equals nothing πŸ€”

unique tulip
#

@umbral snow y intercept = to when x is O so put that in and then x intercept = to when y is o so put that in, and then u get x and y intercept, the question is tricky n idk how to do it. Isosceles triangle has to have 2 sides that r the same

#

Thank you πŸ‘πŸ’š @Mr. L#3864

lone sundial
#

Hi

echo star
#

can i get help with number 3

#

im so confused

#

i get the terms and all but im confused

#

the squares means angle (the computer made it like that idk why) and on number 3, the angle is FGC, its cut off

#

Adjacent- 2 angles that share the same vertex

#

Complementary- equal to 90 degrees

#

Plz helppppp

#

ok nvm

#

got it

errant ether
#

It's March on March 2nd but it's not st patrick's, is the statement true or false there?

#

why?

#

to be clear I'm asking about the statement "If it is March, it is St. Patrick's Day."

#

not the statement I made

amber raven
#

That's false

upper karma
#

quick basic geometry question: arent all postulates/axioms considered to have a 100% truth value?

tribal wind
#

ye

upper karma
#

"If it is March, it is St. Patrick's Day." Truth Value: False | Statement Type: Converse

#

oops

amber raven
#

@upper karma if it's an axiom you have chosen to work with

#

And also does not lead to contradictions which the other axioms you have chosen to work with

upper karma
#

"If it is March, it is St. Patrick's Day." Truth Value: True | Statement Type: Converse
If it is St. Patrick's Day, "It is March" Truth Value: True | Statement Type: Conditional
If it is not St. Patricks Day, it is not March" Truth Value: True | statement type: Inverse
If it is not March, then it is not St. Patricks Day" Truth Value: True | statement type: Contrapositive

#

wouldnt it be this @upper karma

#

?

#

but make sure it is true for all

#

becuz if conditional is true than converse must be too

#

oh yea my bad

#

im a little stumped on that too

#

i understand your logic but the converse statement is a bit tedious

#

it should be false for all i think

#

but then the contrapositive is true tho...hmmmmm

#

yea that conditional is weird

#

well if contrapositive is true, then the conditional statement must also be true

#

yes, same goes with converse and inverse

#

you cannot have 1 or 3 true statements

#

you can only have 0, 2 or 4

#

np

upper karma
#

Is topology ever discussed here

amber raven
#

Ue

#

Yes

upper karma
#

Hm

silver wolf
#

Im looking for help on how to do angles like vertical congruent supplementary and complementary

#

<@&286206848099549185>

amber raven
#

@silver wolf vertical angles idk.
Congruent angles are a pair of angles that can be moved or rotated on to each other so that they cover the exact same space. Congruent means the same. Congruent angles are equal. The only difference between two congruent angles is where they are located and oriented in the plane.

Summplementary angles add up to 180

Complimentary angles add up to 90

What I mean by add up is but the sides of the angles together to you will get a new angle formed by the opposite of sides

upper karma
#

Hello. How do I do this?

pulsar merlin
#

Oh sorry use similar triangles

#

@upper karma

#

Triangles are given in pairs

upper karma
#

similar triangles?

pulsar merlin
#

Prove triangle are similar AAA test in first one

#

He needs to state by which test the triangles are similar before solving them

mild cargo
#

Similar triangles have equal correspondong angles and equal ratio of corresponding sides

#

But you can't use it until you show they are similar

upper karma
#

Sorry but what is the 1st step?

#

my brain is overloaded

pulsar merlin
#

Prove these are similar triangles

upper karma
#

how do i prove it??

twin prawn
#

I can assure you most people on here would Google if they could

pulsar merlin
#

I can teach him how to apply test of similarity, but if he doesn't know the test, how can I proceed ?

upper karma
#

I gave up

#

My maths teacher teaches 3 topics a day in an hour. How am i supposed to catch up?

elfin mica
#

does anyone know how to find the volume of a truncated sqaure pyramid using similar triangles?

elfin mica
#

<@&286206848099549185>

wild hamlet
#

truncated square pyramid...

#

im guessing the volume of the full pyramid minus the volume of the cut off pyramid

quiet bolt
#

I have a very important question

keen aspen
#

ya'

upper karma
#

Wait wait

#

Where is topology

#

😦

plain wigeon
upper karma
#

πŸ‘

little osprey
#

In the acute triangle ABC, D is on AB, E is on AC, and the points F and G are on BC (F is closer to B).
If : DB = DF = DE = AE = EC = CG = FG
Find the angles of ABC.

little osprey
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Looks like I'm oofed.

solid orchid
#

I'm no math expert, but you should be able to conclude that if DF and DB are equal in length, the angle of B and F needs to be the same right?

little osprey
#

Which angle of F.

solid orchid
#

the left

little osprey
#

Yes.

solid orchid
#

AC = 2a
BC = 2a + ?
AB = a + ?
might be useful to solve for the unknown

#

you might be able to with the Pythagorean theorem

little osprey
#

Uhh

#

I'm trying to find angles.

#

And no.

solid orchid
#

if you know the lengths of the three sides, shouldn't you be able to determine the angles?

little osprey
#

Pythagorean Theorem is not possible.

#

Yeah if it's equilateral.

#

Which it maybe.

little osprey
#

There is no way to get BF.

#

Ok, I'll be back later on.

solid orchid
#

is DE parallel to BC?

shadow anvil
#

Maybe

#

You can't assume it is though

solid orchid
#

DF should be parallel to EC though right

shadow anvil
#

no

solid orchid
#

or actually maybe not

little osprey
#

Ok, I'm back.

#

@solid orchid DF is parrallel to EG

solid orchid
#

is that even possible?

little osprey
#

Use similar triangles

#

afc and egc are similar

#

then you can prove parallel lines by corresponding angles being the same.

#

You understand what I did?

solid orchid
#

doesn't that just mean AF is parallel to EG

#

I don't have any expertise in geometry, mind you

little osprey
#

Oh yes.

#

My apologies.

#

Not DF

#

My mind isn't at it's best state.

#

I'm not an expert either.

#

But I do what I can.

solid orchid
#

does geogebra allow unknown lengths or something? Seems like a computer aided tool would be perfect for problems like this

little osprey
#

hm....

#

I don't know.

solid orchid
#

I should probably make one if there are none already

#

seems like it would be super handy

little osprey
#

But I mean.

#

I kinda want to solve it.

#

With proof and everything.

#

Eh.

solid orchid
#

the computer would give a reason lol

little osprey
#

Geogebra doesn't give reasoning?

solid orchid
#

but yea, solving by hand can be more satisfying

#

but when you're stuck, computer aid can be nice

#

it can help expand knowledge as well

little osprey
#

true.

solid orchid
#

not sure if that's possible by the definition given

#

where F and B are on the same location

#

which would make the triangle equilateral

#

I'm pretty sure it follows the same rules you gave

chilly notch
waxen gorge
#

So

#

we have two quarter circles

chilly notch
#

yeah

waxen gorge
#

Or radius 10

#

of

chilly notch
#

area of those are 25pi each

waxen gorge
#

yes

chilly notch
#

i got that and that but i'm stuck from therer

#

*there

waxen gorge
#

lemme think

#

Well we know the height from the bottom to the top intersection is 5sqrt3

chilly notch
#

erm...

#

hold on

waxen gorge
#

@chilly notch what class r u taking

chilly notch
#

year 9

waxen gorge
#

Like is this only with geometry or can u use calculus

chilly notch
#

this is only with geometry

#

i have one of those teachers who doesn't like using advanced methods for simple questions

waxen gorge
#

I feel like there's a super easy way to do it but I'm dumb

chilly notch
#

same

#

argh

#

i'm sure nobody else in my class will get it though

#

only that one guy who is a genius

#

and took a-levels when he was 5

waxen gorge
#

What are a-levels

upper karma
#

t!wiki a-levels

loud cedarBOT
waxen gorge
#

R u a British pleb

#

European

#

Idk

chilly notch
#

yes i'm a british pleb

waxen gorge
#

owo

chilly notch
#

well boys, my time is up

#

*and girls

waxen gorge
#

The diagonal is 10

#

It's 30,60,90

chilly notch
#

how do you know though

clear haven
#

it was equilateral

#

then he split it in half

#

so 306099

#

306090*

#

thus 10 for hypotenuse

#

idk how that helps tho but ye

waxen gorge
#

He put a ? Next to the diagonal

#

So

clear haven
#

o ok

waxen gorge
#

@chilly notch did u make that or find it online

#

<@&286206848099549185> ?

tribal wind
#

36

waxen gorge
#

@tribal wind how owo

tribal wind
#

idk any geometry

#

just use formula for circle

#

like sqrt(100-x^2)

clear haven
waxen gorge
#

ya but how does that prove all the sides are 6 like

tribal wind
#

like one of those circle curves has the equation y=sqrt(100-x^2)

#

and for a square you want the height y to equal the width 2|x-1/2|

timber hinge
#

Its pretty obvious from that its 36

#

But hardly an elegant method

waxen gorge
#

like

tribal wind
#

ur face is elegant

timber hinge
#

❀

clear haven
#

oh i see but how is that legit ya

#

proof

waxen gorge
#

I would just maximize it but this is just geometry

#

;-;

tribal wind
#

gl finding the secret hidden line and the rotation

timber hinge
#

You can prove those points lie on it exactly if you wanna be pedantic but like they do lmao

clear haven
#

yeah

timber hinge
waxen gorge
#

Lol

clear haven
#

nice proof lol

timber hinge
#

ikr

#

defo didn't steal it

clear haven
#

mhm

timber hinge
#

❀

tribal wind
#

another proof is that since you could draw a right triangle there, it has to be 3-4-5

clear haven
#

πŸ–€

tribal wind
#

and it looks too big to have side length 8

timber hinge
#

Or you can use a ruler QED

waxen gorge
#

why r the numbers so nice ;-;

timber hinge
#

They pretty much always are in these type of problems

#

No calcs and stuff

tribal wind
#

oh I found the right geometry way to do it

timber hinge
#

Its more about the method than the actual rote calculations

tribal wind
#

use the right triangle at the corner of the green square

clear haven
#

there are a lot of triangles that can be made my fren

#

which one

tribal wind
#

corner of green, corner of 10x10

clear haven
#

im being dumb but i legit wanna know uwu ty

#

yes

#

aight

waxen gorge
#

I'm still confused I cri

tribal wind
#

so for every geometry problem you have to find the hidden line

clear haven
#

OH SHIT

tribal wind
#

we did it

clear haven
#

THATS IT

#

YEAH ITS HALF

#

er wait

#

wht

tribal wind
#

fight me

clear haven
#

yeah i was thinking that line but what do we do

#

angle ?

waxen gorge
#

wat about the line

tribal wind
#

make a bunch of variables and solve the same equation you get from using the circle equation xd

#

red line is 10, bottom side is (10-x)/2

#

height is x

waxen gorge
#

But how do u find the part of the line not on the square knowing the lines length is 10

#

Oh

clear haven
#

wut y is bottom (10-x)/2

#

doesnt that just give you the white bit?

tribal wind
#

oh

clear haven
#

shouldnt we add x to that to make it include the green part?

tribal wind
#

10-(10-x)/2

clear haven
#

???

torn linden
high pelican
#

"D bisects angle BDF"

torn linden
#

I know

#

I need help starting the proof

high pelican
#

what does it mean for DH to bisect BDF

torn linden
#

the angle is cut in half

high pelican
#

or, in other words...

torn linden
#

Ummm...

#

Angle is half? Idk

high pelican
#

"bisects" means that two things are equal

torn linden
#

Oh

#

So it would be something like:

#

Given:

#

Angle 1 = Angle 2

#

DH bisects angle BDF

#

Therefore BDH = FDH

#

is that right?

#

do I need more? Am I missing something?

high pelican
#

yeah

#

it could be that the problem is messed up

torn linden
#

I feel like there's more lol

high pelican
#

and they wanted DBH = DFH

torn linden
#

Oh sorry

high pelican
#

that would be the more natural problem to ask

torn linden
#

Maybe I have to use one of the postulates or something

high pelican
#

given what is printed, it really is a one step proof

torn linden
#

Oh ok

#

I got 2 more questions lol

#

How would I start?

#

I really struggle with starting

high pelican
#

so, what tools do you have for proving triangles congruent?

torn linden
#

Ok so I got a bunch of postulates and theorems I can use

#

Side-Side-Side Postulate

#

Side-Angle-Side Postulate

#

Angle-Side-Angle Postulate

#

Angle-Angle-Side Theorem

#

I can use those

high pelican
#

okay

#

which things can you say are equal in the diagram?

torn linden
#

Um

#

Ok well we know that a side and an angle are congruent on both triangles

high pelican
#

which ones?

torn linden
#

And that CM is equal to DM

#

sooo...

#

is it Angle-Angle-Side Theorem?

high pelican
#

so you have CM = DM, and angle M = angle B

#

what information have you not used yet?

torn linden
#

M is midpoint of AB

high pelican
#

yes

torn linden
#

uh..

high pelican
#

that tells you that two things are equal

torn linden
#

Which two?

high pelican
#

If M is in the middle of AB, then...

torn linden
#

Then AM and MB are equal

high pelican
#

exactly

torn linden
#

Ooooh

#

ok

#

Lemme get this

#

Wow thanks @high pelican you are great lol

#

Or I just have bad logik

high pelican
#

no problem πŸ˜„

torn linden
#

I got one more one sec thi

#

tho

#

Ok last one

#

So the question here is:

#

Can you prove the pairs of triangles are congruent? Justify your answer. If there is not enough information, list what else you would need to know in order to prove they are congruent.

high pelican
#

so, it looks like we have two sides that we know are equal, and one angle

torn linden
#

right

high pelican
#

has there been any discussion about SSA?

torn linden
#

No...

high pelican
#

hmm

#

well, side-side-angle is missing from your list of theorems

high pelican
#

right

torn linden
#

Yeah we talked about how SSA isn't a thing in class

high pelican
#

okay

#

did they go over an example of when it does not work?

torn linden
#

Also how ASS isn't a thing either

#

um no

high pelican
#

hmm

torn linden
#

Wait

#

I think I may have something

high pelican
#

so that picture makes it look like those two triangles are congruent

#

can you maybe redraw the picture so that the angles and sides are still the same, but the triangles are clearly not congruent?

torn linden
#

Wait one second

high pelican
#

okay

torn linden
#

Ok so we did this in class

#

Maybe this will help?

#

I can type it out...

high pelican
#

nah

torn linden
#

Ok

high pelican
#

so here's the thing

torn linden
#

Ok

high pelican
#

we have the length of AD fixed, but not the angle DAC

#

so imagine AD as a swinging rod that we can move back and forth

torn linden
#

Ok

high pelican
#

if we swing AD clockwise, we will eventually reach a point where we touch the bottom line again

torn linden
#

Ok

#

Right

#

We will have covered a portion of the entire shape by then

high pelican
#

so we would still have those two sides and two angles equal, but now the two triangles are clearly not equal

#

because one is obtuse and one is acute

torn linden
#

Ok

high pelican
#

so to answer this question, it would help to draw a picture showing the two possibilities for AD

torn linden
#

How would I explain it then?

#

Oh another thing

#

The Image is not to scale

#

Or accurate

#

It's just there for help

high pelican
#

so if you have two different placements for D, that gives you two noncongruent possibilities for the lower left triangle, and only one of those is congruent to the upper right triangle

#

so we can't say that they are congruent

torn linden
#

Remember the question is

#

Can you prove the pairs of triangles are congruent? Justify your answer. If there is not enough information, list what else you would need to know in order to prove they are congruent.

high pelican
#

right, and the answer is no

torn linden
#

So we can't say they are congruent

#

What would we need to prove that they are congruent

high pelican
#

there are a lot of things

torn linden
#

Such as?

high pelican
#

another equality of sides, another equality of angles

torn linden
#

Right

#

That's what I put for the other questions

high pelican
#

or even just them both being acute

torn linden
#

Again not to scale lol

#

But ok

#

No, because we don't have enough information. To prove they are congruent, we would need to know if angle D and angle B are congruent

#

Or if DC and AB are congruent or not

#

Would that be correct?

high pelican
#

looks good, although I would also include a diagram showing how you can make more than one triangle with the same SSA

torn linden
#

Ok

#

Thank you!

#

Is there a way to tell someone to rank you up?

high pelican
#

I don't really know the procedures πŸ˜„

normal vault
#

i found the elements

upper karma
#

Non Euclidean geom3 also here?

twin prawn
tiny grail
#

some help pls

tiny grail
#

any hints anyone ? <@&286206848099549185>

halcyon sierra
#

is this amc

upper karma
#

this question is gross

tiny grail
#

No lol it’s from a tst

rustic cairn
upper karma
#

any 2 points are collinear

upper karma
#

yeah

upper karma
tiny grail
#

assuming caf and bae are collinear

#

just use adjacent angles on st line add up to 180ΒΊc

upper karma
#

My first answer is <CAD and <EAD are adjacent because they share line AD.

tiny grail
#

convince urself that CAB is 65ΒΊ

#

then DAE is 180-65-70

#

@upper karma

upper karma
#

?

#

@tiny grail

tiny grail
#

sorry i didn't really understand the question

upper karma
#

Oh, well I kind of understand it but not well, its asking to make three conclusions, that you know to be true about the figure from looking at it, then support your conclusions with postulates or definitions.

#

<@&286206848099549185>

tiny grail
#

i think it simply means that if two angles share a common line, then they are next to each other, ie adjacent

upper karma
#

Well, everything not bold was my answer to the bolded question.

eager burrow
#

hi

#

Did the helper come to

#

anyone here

#

I just need someone point me in a direction

fair wigeon
#

Ok I'll help lol

eager burrow
fair wigeon
#

What's the question?

eager burrow
#

Im doing question 1

#

and i got to a point and i dont know what im doing anymore

fair wigeon
#

Can you like crop the picture

#

I can't see shit

eager burrow
#

open in orginal

#

in like a browser

#

and you should be able to zoom it

#

when you click it, in the bottom left corner

fair wigeon
#

Ok

#

Yeah

#

So

#

Question #1

eager burrow
#

c^2 -2c +1 +d^2= c^2 + 2ac + a^2 +d^2 -2db + b^2

#

i got up untill that

fair wigeon
#

You use the distance formula to set both those distances equal to each other

eager burrow
#

and im stuck

#

yea

#

i got theyre

fair wigeon
#

That's all it wants I guess

eager burrow
#

For (1) and (2) remember that if a point lies on the Unit Circle it must satisfy x
2 + y
2 = 1. Also, simplify the result as
much as possible.

#

thats in fine print

#

i think i have to solve the entire thing

#

but i dont understand how to do it

fair wigeon
#

Huh

#

Ok so

#

Just that expression you got

#

Can be simplified further

#

Like, you can cross out the c^2

#

On both sides

#

Try and simplify it and see what happens

#

@eager burrow

eager burrow
#

hmm

#

what is the x^2 + y^2 = 1

#

i have to satisfy that

fair wigeon
#

That's the rule that radii are equal

#

That's more relevant for #2

eager burrow
#

soo

#

a^2 + b^2 + 2ac -2db -2c +1 = 0

#

Now im here

fair wigeon
#

Okay

#

So now

eager burrow
#

but this has 4 different variables

fair wigeon
#

Move the d and the C to other side

eager burrow
#

i divided them out

#

ohh

#

wait

#

im confsued

#

which d and c

#

-2c

fair wigeon
#

And then the left side becomes (a+b)^2+2ac

eager burrow
#

and -2db

fair wigeon
#

That's an annoying problem

#

Ok so

eager burrow
#

im confused

#

lol

fair wigeon
#

the last 2 terms of the left side

eager burrow
#

-2db and -2c

fair wigeon
#

-2db-2c

#

Yea

eager burrow
#

yea

#

move those to other side

fair wigeon
#

Move those over

eager burrow
#

so the one side equals those

#

ok

#

leave the plus 1 on the side with the a and b

fair wigeon
#

then you're left with (a+b)^2-2ac-1

#

On the left side

eager burrow
#

yea

#

woops minus your right

fair wigeon
#

Since radii are equal

#

(a+b)^2=1

eager burrow
#

the a+b turns to 1

#

ok

#

i understand

#

soo much more now

fair wigeon
#

-2ac-2=2db-2c+1

eager burrow
#

so its 2ac = 2db +2c

#

how did you get -2ac

fair wigeon
#

It stays

#

It was there before

#

I gtg lol sorry

eager burrow
#

ohh nooo

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

I still need help

#

anyonee out there

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

i waited the 15 minutes

#

geez

#

anyone

steady sleet
#

it's probably late for most people thonker

upper karma
#

It's not late for me but I'm too lazy to help

elfin mica
#

damn

twin prawn
#

You're right about the last part, but that's not the same statement you proposed at the beginning

#

Of course linear pair implies supplementary angles, but NOT linear pair doesn't necessarily imply NOT supplementary

#

Think of two diagonally opposite angles in a square

#

They don't form a linear pair yet their angles add up to 180 degrees, making them supplementary

#

@upper karma

loud tiger
#

Yo can i ask a simple geometry question

#

its really stupid but here idk

#

i know how to answer it

#

but the illustration messed me up

#

So do i answer it like i would using hl congruence theorem

#

or answer it with "outside of the box" stuff

tiny grail
#

@loud tiger realise that th common radii are equal length. They share a hypotenuse and a certain corresponding angle is a right angle

#

Then by RHS they are congruenr

#

This congruence means their corresponding angles are the same

loud tiger
#

oh makes sense. Thanks

#

uh yo one last thing

#

uh

#

how do i solve this

opal blaze
#

If a line is tangent to a circle you know that the angle between radius and line segment is always 90 degrees. Then you can use angle sum of triangle to find the last angle XYO @loud tiger

loud tiger
#

uh. I still dont get it

opal blaze
#

What do you not understand?

loud tiger
#

sorry but can you just tell me what i should do

#

And i'll try to understand what you said

opal blaze
#

YXO is 90 degrees. Because the line segment is tangent to the circle. Therefore can we say that 58 + 90 + XYO = 180

#

Then you just solve for XYO

#

Lol

loud tiger
#

OHHHHHHHHHHHHH

#

OKAY DAMN

#

I can do the rest now thanks a lot ily

opal blaze
#

NpVsos

eager burrow
#

hey

#

anyone can help with a graphing cotangent function

keen aspen
#

Sure

#

If you work better with tangent, just flip the tangent function about the x acis and move it over pi/2

eager burrow
#

hey

#

i got stuck on another problem while i was waiting lol

hard gale
#

go for it

tiny grail
#

=pup barycentric coordinates

charred spearBOT
tiny grail
#

=pup legendre’s symbol

charred spearBOT
gritty flare
#

If we have equlateral triangle with side k and then we draw circle around it, what is circles radius.

hard gale
#

think before saying something that misses a step

#

By Pythagoras, heights (which happen to be the perpendicular bisectors also) in equilateral triangles are sqrt(3)*k/2

#

Then indeed those heights/perp bisectors intersect at their 2/3rds

#

So the center of the circumcircle is 2/3 * sqrt(3)*k/2 units away from each point

#

ie the radius of the circumcircle is k/sqrt(3)

tiny grail
#

Just do sin rule lol

upper karma
#

I got 0.097, is that right? @astral hornet

#

so if i round that, it's 0.10

astral hornet
#

the question asks for the angle measure right?

upper karma
#

yeah

astral hornet
#

if sides are given: use inverse tangent to find angle. if angle is given, use tangent to find side ratios. .097 means you used just tangent

upper karma
#

kk thanks, i might call you on help later tho xd

astral hornet
#

ok

#

going from step 2 to 4, RS + ST was substituted into RT. since 2RS = RS + ST, and 2RS = RS + RS, ST must = RS in order to = RS + RS. since both RS and ST share S and are equal, S will be their midpoints, when R S T are collinear

upper karma
#

@astral hornet I have an angle of elevation that the top is 53 degrees and it's 50 feet

#

How would I plug that in a calculator

#

I remember it that elevation is not inverse

#

but this sin cos and tan got me confused

astral hornet
#

@upper karma draw the triangle first, and fill in what you know; this may help

upper karma
#

So it's a

#

opp/adj

#

so it's tan

#

tan53 degrees

astral hornet
#

@upper karma since tan(ΞΈ) = opp/adj, and you know adj = 50, let x = opp

#

then isolate x

upper karma
#

adj is 50

#

i don't have a calculator to plug this into so this will be slightly difficult

#

I got 30

#

@astral hornet for opposite

astral hornet
#

tan53 = x/50; x = 50tan53

#

solve for x and that's ur opp

upper karma
#

the heck did you get 35

astral hornet
#

53

upper karma
#

imma need a bot for this

astral hornet
#

@upper karma tan 53 = 1.3...

#

1.3*50=

upper karma
#

65

astral hornet
#

thats ur opp

upper karma
#

yeah im having trouble without like

#

having one of those calculators

astral hornet
#

what calc do you have?

#

in the meanwhile, you can just type ur sin cos tan stuff in search engine and a calc should show up

upper karma
#

I don't know what they're called

#

but I don't have my own

#

TI-84?

astral hornet
#

you can download wabbit as ti84 emu

covert idol
#

== tan(53) * 50

charred spearBOT
#

50Γ—tan(53) = -21.5579098359782

upper karma
#

oh my next question is writing tan60 in fraction

#

that's easy

covert idol
#

Ah thats probably in radians

upper karma
#

root 3 over 2

astral hornet
#

30 60 90 sp tri

upper karma
#

Why do simple radicals exist

#

smh, so complicated

astral hornet
#

right isosceles

#

thus 45 45 90 sp rt

upper karma
#

45 45 90 triangle

#

ok im actually stuck @astral hornet

#

i thought i knew the rule, but i don't

#

I know like the angles are 45 and 45

#

I remember you have to divide by 2

#

but im so lost

astral hornet
#

given a triangle with legs x, x^2+x^2=sqrt(2x^2)=xsqrt2 via pythag. therefor the ratio is x : x : xsqrt2

#

substitute what you know into the ratio

upper karma
#

x = 5 sqrt 2

astral hornet
#

@upper karma x is legs

#

and you dont know the lengh yet

#

you do know the hyp is 5, 5 = xsqrt2

#

in 5 = xsqrt2, isolate x

upper karma
#

oh i am so

#

so so so

#

lost.

astral hornet
#

5 = xsqrt2, x = 5/sqrt2; rationalize it

upper karma
#

ohhhhhhh

#

shit

#

this is making me look bad

#

i have like 20 more questions to go but these look relatively easy

#

I basically had 2/4.47

#

nevermind

#

Wait how do I write cos16 into terms of sine?

astral hornet
#

cos(ΞΈ) = sin (90-ΞΈ)

upper karma
#

how do you know this

astral hornet
#

they're complementary functions

upper karma
#

thanks for ya help bro @astral hornet

#

i needed help on this review

#

I missed 2 days of class, πŸ‘

astral hornet
#

cos(ΞΈ) = sin (90-ΞΈ) means cos of a number = sine of 90 minus that number btw

#

and np

late robin
#

Hi

#

Can anyone help me with this question

#

Thank you @upper karma

#

At first I thought it 45 since ACB is 90

winged arch
#

Hello guys can anyone help me with this question

#

in triangle ABC, B-M-C and BM = MC =6, if A-D-B and <BDM = < ACB AD=14 Find DB Edited :wrong problem I am stupid

#

This is how my prof drew it and how he solved it

#

I don't understand how he did this problem

winged arch
#

<@&286206848099549185>

little osprey
#

How would you draw it.

winged arch
#

my prof drew it on the top left of this picture

#

wait

#

wrong picture

#

my bad

#

Yes this is his drawing

slim gorge
#

anyone know spiral symmetry (complex numbers)?

#

wait nvm, i got it

tiny grail
#

@slim gorge yes

#

Look at miquelbpoint and spiral centres

#

And complete quadrilaterals

slim gorge
#

nah, i was just stupid :P

upper karma
heavy crag
#

I need some vectors help if anyone is able to

#

It is fairly simple, but it's been a long while since I've done it

hard gale
#

post your thing so that someone can help

heavy crag
#

I got part a) as: r = (3i + 5j +2k) + t (i + j + k)

#

But I can't recall how to do part b)

heavy crag
#

nvm I got it

wild mirage
#

Moved this question over to this channel, as it seem more suited for it, I'm just curious if I could use cosine law with this question, as it doesn't give enough information for the law for SSS and SAS

hard gale
#

the two rafters have equal lengths, that's what you're forgetting I believe

wild mirage
#

As you can get all the angles and just the one side

#

But what I find strange is the rafters are the unknowns

#

cutting out SAS and SSS

#

or am I just being blind

hard gale
#

yeah, just solve for them

wild mirage
#

How would I tho, as I don't have the information for the two requirements for the law

#

the main that the question is confusing me about

#

c^2 = 15.6^2 + b^2 - 2(15.6)(b)cos52

#

just can't wrap me around it

hard gale
#

the fact that you know the rafters are equal shortcuts that SAS/SSS yup

#

the 2 rafters meet at an 52Β°

#

ie c is 15.6 here

#

and a=b

wild mirage
#

So the question can't be solved with cosine but with sine law?

#

is that the point of the question lol

#

because the next one asks me to solve it using sine law

#

I'm sorry if I'm being really blunt about this

hard gale
wild mirage
#

wait

#

if a = b

#

that would shorten the equation

#

a^2 = 15.6^2 - 2(15.6)cos52

#

something like that right?

hard gale
wild mirage
#

man

#

this question is getting to me

hard gale
#

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab*cos(52)

#

(ie cosine rule)

#

now since a=b,

#

2a^2 - 2a^2*cos(52) = 15.6^2

dire lily
#

AC:BC=4:3, hc=24, ACB=90Β° <- any idea how to solve this triangle?

wild mirage
#

so I have to find the value of 2a^2

#

then / to get a/b

#

interesting

hard gale
#

well a=b

#

why would you divide after?

wild mirage
#

As I'm getting the value of both a + b together

hard gale
#

ahhh lel yea

wild mirage
#

would make sense to me to divide

hard gale
#

i thought you said "i solve for a"

#

:/

wild mirage
#

all good

#

thanks for pushing me on the right path goow

hard gale
#

🍻

wild mirage
#

So goow, i just wanna confirm I have it all good
15.6^2 = 2x^2 - 2x^2cos52
x^2 = 15.6^2 / (2- 2cos52)
x^2 = 15.6^2 / cos52 = 395.26
rad395.26
x = 19.88