#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 115 of 1
Hi
find z first (consider triangle PSB)
then the alternate segment theorem allows you to find x directly
then you should know what to do to find y
How?
get a list of circle theorems online and look through it
nvm I got it, thx
(a)
x = 35°, y = 70°, z = 55°.
(b)
In triangle OQB, OQ ⊥ AB (radius to tangent).
∠PQB = 55°, so ∠QOB = 70° (central angle).
∠PRB equals ∠PQB (alternate segment theorem), so lines RB and PQ are parallel by corresponding angles.
(ii)
[No inequality given, unable to solve.]
you meant OB ⊥ AB right?
please don't give full solutions
unless the person has shown their working
also the alternate segment theorem does not say that PRB is equal to PQB
ohhhhhhh i didnt consider that i got it G thanks
no worries!
yesssir thanks homie ily
thanks!
hi
PBS and sbr are triangles with one side substended by the diameter you can use this to solve the rest of the trinagle
I don't think so
yeah their reasoning for (b) is completely wrong
every line has an error
are the answers for the values of x y and z wrong too?
because i got the same answers
should be x = 35, y = 70, z = 35
yeah i got x as 35 with the alt segment theorem
how would we prove it?
the diagram already has a proof of the alternate segment theorem
given that PSB is a right angle, you can deduce that angle SPB = 90 - PBS = 90 - (90 - z) = z
but then by angles in the same segment, angle SPB = angle SRB = z
ahh
a
Yeah same
What's the question/
Just one pair of congruent triangles will do that.
which is?
Well, what do you think? We want to specifically prove that BE = CD, right?
What triangles contain those sides?
dbf cef
?
Do you disagree?
i dont disagree but i dont see how that would help me to an answer
I mean, there is only one visible triangle in the diagram that has BE as one of each sides.
If two pairs of triangles are congruent, that means each part of the triangles are congruent!
The point is, if we want to show that BE = CD, we should find two triangles that contain those two sides. That way, if we can prove the two triangles are congruent, it follows that these two sides are also congruent.
ye i think it was like cpctc or sum like that
i think the last part im suppose to be looking for is a side
but im not too sure which one
or the reason for it
since already got 2 angles
Did you see this?
Ignore the question for a moment, we just want to know what are the two triangles.
If you can figure out what the triangles are, the reasoning/statements should follow.
Neither of those two triangles has BE as a side.
Good! Well, AEB contains BE, but now we want another triangle that contains CD!
Any ideas?
acd
Good! Now if you want to be consistent, you should write it as ADC :)
Because AEB goes from A to E to B and ADC goes from A to D to C.
Now, are the triangles AEB and ADC congruent?
looks congruent
Sure but I don't think your teacher accepts the reasoning "it looks congruent" 😭
Is there a specific postulate used for proving congruency?
you mean like the sss sas all that?
Yes.
fianly 😭
i got the rest
thanks
i originally thought i would have to prove dbf and ecf are congruent first then say cpctc
Yeaaaaa the problem is that these two triangles don't contain BE or CD, as Troposphere mentioned awhile ago.
Usually the first step when doing a proof question is, you need to sort of look for ways that directly relate to the thing you are finding.
That's why I said you need to look for triangles that contain BE.
And in general, if you have a question asking you to prove something = something, a good start would be to find a triangle or shape that actually contains that thing.
👀 Hello, Im weak in geometry, i want to start from scratch but i don't know from where to start, can anybody help me to create a road map? my final Exam will be in Feb
could any one explain to me the geometric mean theorem and how to solve problems with it 🥹 i think i know how to find y but i'm not sure about x
I’d use Pythagorean theorem idk
If you know y u can find x
yeah i did but i have a quiz tmr and the teacher wants us to solve it using the geometric mean theoreom 💔
oof
lemme try to solve it
well i mean
geometric mean theorem is when you find the geometric mean of 5 and 12
so u solved that
I don’t think you can do anything else
ig
wait
yea
just do Pythagorean theorem
u used geometric mean theorem already
5^2 + sqrt of 60^2 =x^2 so x^2= 25 + 60
X = square root of 85
That’s it
yw lol
how do i find the circumcenter of a triangle on a graph? i know it has to do with midpoints and perpendicular bisectors of each side intersecting in the middle to find the center, but each time i try to do it without a graph i seem to get it wrong.
Find equation of any two perpendicular bisectors
Using slope intercept form
N solve 2 equations to get circumcentre
thanks
there's also another way where the equation of a circle is $x^2 + y^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0$
south
for each of your three (x, y) coordinates, sub them into this equation
you will get 3 simultaneous equations involving D, E, F
then by completing the square, you will find that the centre is (-D/2, -E/2)
Yepp considering the circumcentre of circumcircle
👍
Also it will be $(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2$
Jake
any ideas ?
the two quadrilaterals are similar to each other (both have two right angles; corresponding angles)
oh in fact the largest quadrilateral is also similar to the other two (it's not, I got the wrong orientation)
how to do it with triangles ?
we shouldn't use similar quadrilaterals
yeah what are similar quad
it's the same as any similar shape
the criterion we are using is that the 4 angles are the same in both quadrilaterals
why not?
cause we only got taught similar triangles
is this a textbook problem then?
or did you randomly find it on the internet
internet
the internet doesn't limit itself to the school curriculum
in fact that's the whole point of competition maths and so on
i mean my friend sent me it and said it's a good one
so i assumed it's based on knowledge we know
Probably it just isnt posible to get the value of x without more information
oh his friend trolled him
one sec I'll draw it out
this gives the answer away but
reflect the bigger quadrilateral from left-facing to right-facing
and then I just rotated the smaller quadrilateral counter-clockwise
@everyone recommend me a book that has a butt ton of problems for me to solve and practice for trigonometry
The horizontal line from the midpoint of the right side divides the slanted 10+4 line in half. So the green triangle is a 3:4:5 triangle.
how to find area of right angled triangle where one of sides is 31
Knowing one side length is not enough to find the area of the entire triangle.
I came until here and I am stuck here :p
turns out I was going the wrong way
(I think)
ik but teacher told me that its posible
this side is not hypothenes
Either you have additional information that you have not told us here, or the teacher is wrong.
So the side length of the square is 14·(4/5), and we get
x = 14·(4/5) - 4·(4/5) - 10·(3/5) = 2
the best part that he told me that i dont even need to use trigonometry
There must be information you have not told us about.
no
thats all information
A right triangle with sides 31, 2, sqrt(965) has area 31.
A right triangle with sides 31, 4, sqrt(977) has area 62.
These triangles both match the single bit of information you have; so it is not possible to find the area knowing just the length of one of the sides.
If you know the angle, you can find it
31 = Hypotenuse * sinx
Adjacent = Hypotenuse * cosx
(31 * Adjacent)/2 = Area
If you don't know anything other than "One side is 31" you can't find it
one angle is 90
thhats it
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
So this iis the triangle we know?
yes
You can't find it
you need other information
(i.e.) is this triangle inside of a rectangle
are there any other triangles we know
You can get it to have any area you want by setting the other leg to be (desired area)·2/31.
hey everyone, what is the best way to understand geometry? I'm trying to learn by textbook's
2 or 3 Dimentional understanding of objects/shapes
espacially triangles
I was think about triangles, has one post-it front of my desk saying "every kind of triangles"
thank you!!!!
you're welcome
you don't need to
ohh ok thanks
you're welcome
It would need to be at least 7 in order to satisfy the triangle equality.
Check your arithmetic that gave 40.622 again.
c^2 = 109-60*cos34
cos34 is approximately 0.8
(8/10)*60 = 48
109-48 = 61
61 is approximately c^2
c is approximately 8 (c < 8)
3-4-5 triangle
Does anybody have any good websites/sources i can use to study for my trig final? Cumulative. Im already doing everything my prof has up, but I want more.
angles for a 3-4-5 right triangle is (in degrees) 37-53-90
Approximately.
Khan
Really
Approxmately, yes
C ≈7.69
does anyone know any good resources that are free for trigonometry and in depth for self learning?
Which level?
bro I was just trying to make a joke 
i'm not even doing A level
Not a joke channel brota ... Use #chill
bro, is it that deep...

Use other channel
@spring lion You do 🤨
Bro you are literally in the channel
it's also a shitty joke
Okay I got access to pre uni
anybody know this?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
hmhm
if u try drawing it it helps
Σ
Use V=Bh
or are the edge lengths the edge of the diagonals?
The slant edges are 12 m too (otherwise there's too little information to find the requested angle).
(So it's really half of a regular octahedron, which if you squint the right way gives you the angle it asks for immediately without any calculation. But you're probably supposed to calculate).
You get an octahedron by taking two of these pyramids and gluing them together along the square sides.
yeah
The problem didn't ask for the volume, though.
What do they want us to do
"Find the angle between a slant edge and a base diagonal".
They want us to find the angle the diagonals that converge make
We should probably see how @ebon ice himself reacts to the drawing before going too far ahead.
Ok
I guess we can look at it from top down actually
it will be the midpoint of the square
Use $l=sqrt(h^2+(b/2)^$
Jake
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Is it the exterior angle? or the alternate interior near the converge?
We want the angle between the two green lines.
(The thin green line I've added is the "base diagonal").
But perhaps that was what you meant too?
Yeah, those two lines lie in a plane.
It's even easier if you don't split it into two triangles by the altitude. :-)
I think we can just use Pythag
and then just solve for all lengths
since sqrt(12 squared + 12 squared) = missing length that cuts through our square pyramid
and then just use sin/cos quotients to get the angles
which should lead us to 30/60 or 45/45 but I gotta go eat lunch at this point
The shortcut is to notice that the red and blue triangles here are congruent by SSS.
sure uh ill post it
i had to use google translate, the angle is v (not y). I need help with b)
The answer is -a/b, but why?
cause the angle after 270degrees drops to the quadrant iv wich x in positive and y negative so tan becomes negative
As I understand tan is y/x so normally it would be b/a
But why is it a/b? I also realize that the y is negative
But the flip I Dont follow
i think it has to do for the (a,b) look at the exercise at the circle i think you flip this
so tan(270+u)=-a/b
I think I get it now
does that work for any value of a,b ?
np
What?
triangle?
height * perimeter
is wire frame cube
essentially
imma draw it in ms paint rn
this is height times perimeter essentially but the inside is empty
so a cube but not filled in my material
<@&268886789983436800>
oh then just mult it by the number of lines of the polygon 4 * (19.6 in * 15 in)
And then I saw that person using Pythagorean theorem and sin,cos, tan
just resources for trig, that cover precalc as well, I am self learning so there isn't a level I can say.
how to solve
Ooh that one's fun!!! I'm gonna ask a bunch of leading questions to let you figure it out yourself.
no gng js give me the answer
So first, what are you looking for? What are some things that would prove it's a rhombus?
bruh
Nah I'm not giving you the answer you have to figure it out yourself. I'm just giving you guiding hints
Step by step
✨
Fine. To prove it's a rhombus the sides all need to be equal length. Idk if you've learned any other properties yet
Draw the diagram out and mark the congruent angles
What triangles are congruent? What angles are congruent?
What triangles are right triangles, etc.
So you see two congruent right triangles, correct? And you know that the overall shape is a parallelogram
Prove the right triangles are congruent
Do that by finding congruent angles and side lengths.
Then you know that TY is congruent to TW
And since opposite sides of parallelograms are congruent, TW is congruent to YX and YT is congruent to XW
So all 4 sides are congruent and it's a parallelogram
Do you need any help proving the two right triangles congruent?
You use ASA
With the base of the right triangles, the right angle, and the shared angle
So do you know how to solve the question now?
hi I have a probably easy problem that I can't be bothered to solve myself
what's the circumradius of an n-simplex with unit inradius
1/2 apothem times perimeter = Area
yesterday i taught myself trig with triangles, i am not in a trig class (i'm in advanced algebra)
should i move to unit circles next? after that i don't know what
sorry if that was a dumb question but i'm genuinely curious because this is my first time i'm learning a math topic for fun
yes, you should learn unit circle
Ok so the triangle is an isosceles triangle so use it's 2 angles congruent properly
oh right
Also use vertically opposite angles to find BCE
thats just 44 right
And find other angles of triangle by sum of angles= 180
Yepp
ohh
And sum of ABE and EBC angles is 180 as they r complementary angles
well how do i know that BCE goes onto the other side since EB is like at a weird angle
I can share some documents related to it
????
Whatt
thank you
broo idk how the 44 goes onto the other side
is it because it's a isoceles triangle?
No
no yea i know that but what am i supposed to do with the vertical angles
if it goes onto that side then how does it help me find the answer
Consider CEB and EBC both x as they r equal
N find them
is this because theyre isoceles
Use sum of angles of triangle is 180
68
Yess the triangle is isosceles as 2 sides r equal
oh so then
N if 2 angles r equal then sides r also equal
It's the other way around the property
Yepp
👍
side length
like they're equal to each other?
yeah, t=t, y=y
it's just telling you that the sides of the rectangle are equal
ok thanks
np 👍
i'm 15 dawg
I saw some the question is word problem
That they are a rectangle
But their length and width are the same
Hyperbolic geometry attack in Fist Of The North Star 2:
where is the hyperbolic
Look at the pink net that the evil guy shoots from his hand.
In the show it is called Anryu Tenha. Anryu Tenha is a technique of the North Star Lapis Lazuli martial art that distorts the physical space around the opponent, causing the opponent to become disoriented.
it seems to be non-eucludean but idk about hyperbolic specifically
I'm about to do that lesson soon too!
We have the same textbook.
Sorry wrong send
Could somebody help me with some trig study I’m doing for the act?
what should i study for my final for geometry
Old exam sets are very often the best advice.
Yes
hopefully when you were practicing through each topic, you only did all the odd-numbered questions or something
to refresh your memory, practice the questions you didn't do while you were learning that topic
start from the oldest topic and work your way forwards
once you have a decent grasp of all of the content, then you can go into practicing previous years' papers
otherwise those exam questions will seem like "class: 2 + 2 = 4; exam: if Johnny has an apple, what is the mass of the Sun?"
About 10^29 times the age of the shepherd, of course.
hello how does putting a one over a trigomentric sign like cos switch the adjacent and hypotenuse
cos = a/h
so $\frac{1}{\frac{a}{h}} = \frac{1}{\frac{a}{h}} \cdot \frac{h}{h}$
south
pls show your work
my work? all i was able to find was the locus of the centre of circle C3 by using conditons of orthogonality
right, what did you get for that?
its shortcut is to find the radical axis of both cirlcles , so js subtract both the circles' equation
man its so negligible
send it anyways
js why 
hmm i cant show my work on paper as i dont have my phone with me rn
is there some software to show calculations and stuff?
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/irsxk8baxl
okay hopefully you got something like this
multiple options,
latex if you know it
graph/type stuff up in desmos or geogebra
or draw in paint
using $2g_1 g_2 + 2f_1 f_2 = c_1 + c_2$
south
or a combination of the above
it was an exam question so i couldnt graph it, i was trying to find as many relations as possible. I did make a rough sketch but i got stuck when i tried to use chord of contact with given midpoint(assuming h,k for the locus) formula, T = S1 as i didnt have the centre of circle C3
What is the locus of the midpoint of the chord of contact of tangents drawn from points lying on the straight line 4x 5y 20 to the circle x2 + y2 9 a 20x2 + y2 36x + 45y 0 b 20x2 + y2 + 36x 45y 0 c 20x2
ty
What is the minimum value of sum of intercepts made by a variable tangent of ellipse with semi major axis a and semi minor axis b on the coordinate axes
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
!help
No Category:
help Shows this message
Type !help command for more info on a command.
You can also type !help category for more info on a category.
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
you should show your work if you want help
let's say the tangent passes through (p, q)
where (p, q) is on the ellipse
immediately there's an equation for this tangent (think back to the tangent equation for a circle)
actually there's likely no closed form for this
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3167873/minimum-value-of-length-of-tangent-of-the-ellipse-fracx2a2-fracy2b
it's probably intended to be this
Hey guys any suggestions on what questions to do for geometry which are good level for class 9th
Just do
1/2(x+15)=3x solve for x
How well we know that 3x is half of x+15 based on the tick marks
No, they're just similar (by a version of the SAS theorem for similarity).
Since angle BAC = angle DAE and AB:AD = 1:2 = AC:AE, triangles ABC and ADE are similar.
So in particular BC:DE = 1:2 too.
could someone help me with trig identities
I hate it!!
Well I love it but it’s a little confusing
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
How do you solve those type of equations tho?
any1 recommend some books for inmo im beginner in geo
do you have sl loney trigonometry?(its a book)
it's easier if you send a question from your book
the value of x is 3
well its pretty easy to solve these type of questions
basic proportionality, as the 3x side divides the traingle proportional we know its parallel to the third side therefore 2.3x = x+15, x=3, similarity not required
that proportionality comes from similarity
What’s this formula
does anyone have any tips and tricks to be able to quickly prove trig identities
u dont need toprove it while answering if u just write the theorem, thts wht he asked
@low ocean sorry bit late but i can't get how will this prove bisection? What do we use?
oh wait, triangle BAD ~ BEC, if so then BAD = BEC. Hencee AD parallel to EC
yup, also BAD=BEC
yeah
thank you a bunch once again, i prolly wouldnt figure this all out
np
Hello
excuse me how do I know whether to put the 2 in front of k"pi"
whether I do 2kPI or just kPI
and whether it has a second solution?
or just one
depends on what trig function you have
yeah thats kind of the question
how to I know which to use it on
or a rundown of there variables would help like why or why not put the 2k instead of just k
is this a good place to ask a question about area moment of inertia?
Area moment of inertia?
That's more physics, lol
Wait, haven't I talked to you before?
Yeah, weren't you the guy asking about integrals?
How about conservation of momentum
I learned that btw
Nice
That states that momentum cannot be created or destroyed
That was part of my teachers notes
But what’s the original
The original?
I mean, the statement is just that if there are no external forces on a system, then both linear and angular momentum is conserved.
Yea
So then the statement for energy is just that if there are no external forces on a system, then both linear and angular energy is conserved.
Well, yea
I mean
Yeah
Check this otu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWVZ6APXM4w
Higher: http://bit.ly/blockhigher
Same height: http://bit.ly/SameHeight
Lower: http://bit.ly/BlockLower
Special Thanks to:
Henry (MinutePhysics): http://www.youtube.com/minutephysics
Destin (Smarter Every Day): http://www.youtube.com/smartereveryday
Greg and Mitch (ASAP Science): http://youtube.com/asapscience
Elise Andrew (I F***ing Love Scien...
Conservation of energy
Higher
Yeah I just haven't found any physics/engineering discords that are really active like this one, and no I've only ever asked one question in this discord before and it was in #multivariable-calculus about maple and partial derivatives
Same height
Ok
Oh, maybe I'm thinking of someone else then.
Well, I would probably ask about area moment of inertia in either #multivariable-calculus or #calculus
Definitely not here
okay thanks
What should I study to understand this better? The book isn't really helping me much. 😔
Like what specific lesson is this
are you having trouble with the algebraic equations you get?
or do you literally not know that $m(CD)$ is angle $COD$
It's geometry I'm not that good with
south
I know that too
questions A, B, C only use "sum of angles on a straight line is 180"
Okay thank you
no worries!
angle segment rules and circle theorums
hi
Books:
- Lemmas in Olympiad Geometry (Sam Korsky...);
- Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads (Evan Chen);
- Geometry revisited (Coxeter...).
Sources: - AOPS;
- Sharygin geometry olympiad (geometry.ru);
- IGO (Iranian Geometry Olympiad);
- GoGeometry.
ty
Bruh, I need help on this
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
By definition, what is perimeter? Use that to set up an equation (note they seem to give you lots of information about triangle DPH).
Ok
Can anyone help me solve for angle A? I am lost.... Both sides are symetrical. Don't know where to start.
You can find two sides of this right triangle and use trigonometry.
I'll give it a shot
Bro.... that made every so easy.... That was the only triangle I didn't try or even see. THANK YOU! I was going crazy 
solve this for me twin
i was using ai ngl and i dont think ts right
gotta be a different way to type ts
💀 u=16
do i js put 3 for the v 2nd part?
yea
ty man 😭
no
this mf gon know i used ai 😭
Wym it is 16
How
It's 8/cos(60)
16/8 = sin90/sin30
Shouldnt be be u sin60 and u cos 30
or this
My bad
V is 8√3 right?
this was right
and yes
Practice
So you can see patterns between questions easier
Yes before i messed up the angle i wrote 60 as 30 and 30 as 60
Ai must have done the same mistake
why are yall not teachers 😭
No where near qualified
yeah sure......
Real
Prolly both, depends on what level but teachers gotta have some sort of degree in maths before teaching it inni
Like one of my maths teacher got a masters and the other got a PhD in physics
oml bro get out of here
All you need is a degree that is somewhat mathematical and then get the teacher's stuff done
My former maths teacher has a degree in engineering, and she teaches up to higher maths. So you don't really need a PhD or Masters
Although you didn't say one was needed
Isnt this just tan(60) = 8/v ?
I mean
use calculactor?
As long as they can actually teach then it's ight
😂
Is chat gpt trippin?
yea sometimes it makes stuff up
Its the pro one too
Second time it messed up and I caught on today
bro forgor how to math
he's been through much, cut him slack
Physics pov
I suck at geometry as the fornules dont make any sense
is this possible to prove
i dotn think so
i think its AAS or ASA but im not sure where the side is suppose to be
might be this
not sure
It's not even true -- for example if MATH is a square, MT is sqrt(2) times the length of HT.
Wait a minute, the diagram doesn't show MT and HT intersecting at B like the text claims; they intersect at T!
Perhaps there's a typo in the statement to be proved too.
Probably the goal should have been |MH| = |TA|.
Huh
How do they intersect at T
T is the endpoint of each of them.
Yeah
But they do intersect at B
"MT bisects HA" so |HB|=|BA|.
B does not lie on HT.
With A
That must be what they meant, but it's not what they wrote.
Is it asking to you prove MB + BT ≅ HT?
mt congruent to ht
Yep but MT is MB + BT
I'm with you
Every time I try to create a form to solve my brains melt. Have you figured it out?
It's really seems to be wrong 😕
I think it is AAS and then just cpctc
You have vertical angle and alternate interior angles for sure
And since mt bisects ha, hb and ba is congruent sides
Could I get help with this? I genuinely cannot figure out where to go with this diagram
recall that kites have perpendicular diagonals
this should clue you into the ||pythagorean theorem||
oh my gosh i just realized this whole time ive been looking at it and havent seen the 10 😭
rip
if cosx+cos²x+cos³x=1, what is sin⁶x-4sin⁴x+8sin²x?
I would try finding sin^2 x first. Think about how you can do this from the given equation
did you resolve it?
.-.
i havent learn what is on the image thing yet
WHY IS THEREE APPROXIMATE SYMBOL BUT ONLY ONE LINE
gone D:
geometry crash
it means its the same as the top one
what grade are you in btw?
im on grad 7
you like math?
YA
alr
i did able to solve a 9th grade math
you want any help on somth?
no
alr
Will u use sin^2(x)+cos^2(x)=1
Can anyone help me
With ?
Uhh ok
So trigonometry involves right angled triangles and canculation of various things based on that
Geometry is just , all the shapes in general n calculations related to that
Theres a exercise i have to understand for exam tmrw
Its cooking me
Can u help me its not a very big one
I can but i am only in high school , so i gotta know the level of difficulty
Im in highschool too
Last garde
So u gotta tell me /show me the q first
Can u go dms
Aight!
INSIDE/ON a unit circle:
Sin is the absolute value of the vertical line the goes from a point on the x axis to a point on the circle's perimeter directly above.
Cos is sin but flipped 90°
Tan is sin/cos
In radians, pi is half a circle. 1/n of the circle's perimeter is 2pi/n in radians.
That's all i know about trig from 3b1b currently. Can anyone correct me?
yes and I got 6
sin is the value of vertical line that goes either above or below. It can be positive when above and negative when below.
It's better to understand cos as the value of horizontal line that goes from the vertical line's base to the origin. Cos is sin but flipped is also correct.
1/n of a "unit" circle's perimeter is 2pi/n in radians. Unit circle means the circle whose radius is 1. If radius isn't 1, then 1/n of circle's perimeter is 2pi/n × radius in radians.
they are like very different but id say that geometry helps you understand trigonometry well
yes
Can someone help me with rotating shapes?
I'm doing high school geometry on Khan academy right now
And I have no idea what to do
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
Oh
Okay my bad
Let me ask
Basically questions like this. It could be 180°, 270° etc etc.
I did watch the explanation video but I'm still confused
is this 90 degrees clockwise or anticlockwise?
I don't know actually
I assume they mean counterclockwise but this is bad wording
yes that's the convention
anyways, here's the idea
Hmmm
you swap the x and y coordinates
so (x, y) = (-2, 1) would become (1, -2)....
except you have to check the quadrant, so that's why it's (-1, -2)
Oh
180 is the easiest one: (x, y) goes to (-x, -y)
180 is the same as -180
no worries! have a try
90 degrees
So
(x, y)->(y, x) but it's first quadrant so
X is positive y is negative?
Is that it?
🧐
(-y, x)?
I'll try!
Damn I failed but that's ok I'll try again.
Ohhhh okay I realized why I got it wrong
In the last point I made a small mistake
Ok ok
I got it right!!
😭 THANKSSSSS
I did a 4/4 god bless you bro 😭
:0
Geometry dash???
Hi, I'm currently in upper high school and we're doing algebraic trigonometry.
I understand most stuff, except demonstrations or comprovations.
They give me an expression like this and I need to simplify it and express it in similar ways until I find that both sides are equal (1=1)
I also wonder that ^ I have no clue how to do these systematically
I suppose besides just applying complex exponential definition, and hoping algebra takes care of the rest
if you're just trying to prove the left = the right try using the cosine sum and difference identities to expand the left hand side and then recognize the difference of squares
i can write it out in a sec
Like sure, you can show how to solve a particular example
But that doesn't give me a method
so first of you want to take it apart so:
(cos(a)+cos(b))(cos(a)-cos(b))=cos²(b)-sin²(a)
that would be in other words:
(cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b))=cos²(b)-sin²(a)
and that would again be:
((1-sin²(a))(1-sin²(b))-sin²(a)sin²(b))
and that is
1-sin²(b)-sin²(a)+sin²(a)sin²(b)-sin²(a)sin²(b)
and that is:
1-sin²(b)-sin²(a)
and that is
cos²(b)-sin²(a)
cos²(b)-sin²(a)
-# I hate my life
-# if there is an issue my explanation is that I am in 9th grade
most of these in my experience are using other identities or occassionally its easier to use the unit circle or a triangle to prove them
I think trig might just be the first non-trivial piece of mathematics taught in schools? Like that's the image I'm getting at least
its definitely the first one that most people get stuck on
maybe square roots. But somehow schools bypass those being an absolute pain in the quack
i never really had to prove identities aside from a math competition when i was a senior in high school but trig as a whole is pretty easy to get stuck on. combining all the algebra in with the geometry makes it easy to trip up on
It would feel more direct to me to start by applying the product identity to the product of cosines on the left.
That separates the a's and b's immediately.
I think trig is just more algebra? But it's dealing with special functions, so it gets tricky
I will try to do that the next time
exactly
that's where the problem is
I learn about specific examples but nothing that puts it together
I finished school ~6 years ago, but I still have no clue
There's not supposed to be a "method" as such other than trying things to see if they work (and having enough experience to be able to tell quickly what is likely to work for an expression that looks like such-and-such).
and I end up resolving for a specific set of values rather than equate two expressions
LOL
Like really? I know there are some situations in mathematics that really do require unique insight, but trig of all things?
And it's not like you are given a week on a problem in a test
Unfortunately school tends to spend so much effort on teaching methods that it's easy for students to leave with the impression that mathematics is about knowing all the cookbook methods and identifying which one to use for which problem.
this is the problem with math classes
-# I have no experience in that section (I just did the expression with sin cos tan the first time but I know the base of trigonometry and the technical aspect wich is why I could even do that)
-# still took me forever
the problem is what he says: they don't give you a week to slowly think about it, they give you an hour and with pressure
so often the solution ends up being teaching cookbooks
But anyway, I made this document kind of explaining it to myself (it's automatically translated to English), but I think there are more identities that I must know?
If you have time, would you please look it up?
This one doesn't take a week to try a few different things. An hour should be more than sufficient unless you squander all of it by panicking about not having a cookbook method to follow.
Like four function algebra over rationals is a cookbook pretty much. There are certainly some questions you can ask, which don't have cookbook answers, but those are also quite recognizable.
In my experience there are about way too many identities to remember
Yeah, it's useful to have a table of them to consult.
Something like 200
(And I'll stick my neck out and say that school systems that expect students to remember all the standard identities are Doing It Wrong).
Obviously infinitely many, but like you get what I mean
well, not all the 200 but knowing some 10 or 20 helps
specially the 5-8 most important ones
if it's teached well, of course
The stuff I know is like cos^2 + sin^2 = 1, e^(ix) = cos(x) + i sin(x), tan = sin/cos
I knew more in school tho
Yeah, agreed. Anything beyond that it seems to be a better use of one's time to look up as needed rather than deliberately memorize.
(If looking it up frequently means you end up remembering some of them, then fine, that's a bonus).
Still, I am really surpriside there isn't an algorithm for trig identities
I mean there are clear algorithms for integration and combinatorial identities
It bothers me greatly
I have a feeling it exists, and I just don't know it.
Algorithms for integration? Huh?
this is something I experienced while learning programming as a hobby! You end up memorizing things, when you continuously look them up and use them. Not as a deliberate exercise!!
Well, there are commonly taught "methods", which are practical by hand. But beyond that there is Risch's algorithm
Obviously methods of integration aren't algorithms, but they are at least somewhat systematic
Yes, Risch's algorithm exists but runs to hundreds of pages.
If that's the limit for what you'll accept, than undoubtedly one could concoct something for bringing trigonometric expressions to a standard form that works within such generous bounds. But for the kind of identities that show up in "prove this" exercises, it's unlikely to be an improvement over trying things by hand -- especially since the point of those exercises is not to find the answer but to train willingness to try different things and see what works.
Dalton is in the chat? Oh wow that's such a pleasure to meet the founder of the modern Atom model...
even if there was a "method/algorithm" id have to imagine due to the natural of transcendental functions that it would be so complicated it would be far easier to just recognize the patterns from the handful of identities you know off the top of your head or from ur reference to a formula sheet
Yes, but it really does bother me that there apparently isn't, when there are methods for integration and combinatorial identities
it is to find the answer tho
It even says that in the problem statement
(usually)
That's what the problem statement says, but it is not the purpose of assigning the exercise.
I'm confused by this. -0.23 can't be an answer because it's referring to time, so which part of the equation do I look at?
"After she starts measuring" must mean that we're looking for the smallest positive t that gives D(t)=50.
So -0.23 is not a correct answer even though D(-0.23) is indeed 50.
Hmmm...
Let me think...
Okay, so sin(pi) = 0, so maybe t = 0.77?
Someone correct me on that if I'm wrong.
Nevermind, that's right. Thank you so much, @grave pond !
Bro I thought this would help with my geometry bit I swear I'm seeing matrix codes rn
Can no 11? Idk 11 means
How u know?
I don't I just think it's 7 cause like 8 is too high and d/e are the same
Oh sorry d 0.5
GEOMEYRY DASHH
B)7. Just a hinge based on observations
guys is there any VC channels for geometry?
there are no public VC channels in this server.
ppl can you explain me why the area of this triangle is always the same while the little square is less or equal than the big one? without limits pls i'm asked for euclidean geometry
O lies on a line through B that is parallel to AC, so taking AC as the base always gives the triangle the same height.
High of lamp its 1.5m (6 floor from lamp-4.5 shadow)
So, lamp <1m (asume) and 0.5m huonge. I don't know how next step
<@&268886789983436800>
hello, i have an ICGSE exam in 2 days and im kinda cooked. Some topics are easy but others are a bit harder for me. Dose anyone know if i could get some help
just ask #❓how-to-get-help
Does this look correct? I'm usually worse at graphing cos(x) than sin(x).
,w 3cos(2x+6pi)+4, x=pi/2
Oh... so it has to equal 1 in the green area.
I tried moving the maximum point, and it seems to equal 1 at pi/2.
Wait... it doesn't...
Yeah, I may need to take this to one of the help channels.
Thanks for pointing that out, though!
I seek to sharpen my trigonometry skills but lack any practice problems.Any know of a way to generate practice problems?
103 trigonometry problems
thanks
i've never personally used this book but from what i know they are pretty hard, but solving them will definitely increase your understanding
titu andrescu it might be cooked 💀
oh i remember being stuck in the sinusoidal graph part for a month
at (x=0) the value of function would be 3sin 2pi/3
you could also find the value of x for which the sin function becomes zero and shift the graph to that x
horizontally
thats x = -2
so shift the whole graph to the left by 2 units
also to account for the -3, shift the whole down by 3 units
Is there an ez way to memorise the cosines and sines plz i need this🥀💔😭
well there is the "trigonometric hand" thing
this what you're looking for? @versed dragon
Ye ty
Do people need this 😭
Just remember sin values and all done
i mean different ppl remember things in different ways
having it laid out visually helps some
Yes it works for some people
it's sin(x)/cos(x), so when cos(x) is 0 you are dividing by 0
So it's certainly not a real number, but if you imagine you could "wrap" the graph around, and then it's actually connected
(where it would be projective infinity)
Actually some of the textbooks use infinity while some use not defined so which is correct and can both be same ??
I think textbooks saying infinity are more thinking about it in terms of limits
depends on the exact wording/context
that's missing a few words/numbers
Means??
Tan is infinity or undefined
makes no sense
ok, then that's undefined
Is it different (infinity and undefined)
yes
Does anyone have recommendations on resources for trig? I'll be doing calc 1 soon and haven't been in school for years. Doing college algebra next semester so I would like to freshen up on trig during the break!
What if i spread my fingers too much
then it wouldnt be 90 degrees
jk
very smart
Given triangle XYZ in the first quarter of the plane, G is the centroid, X_1, Y_1, Z_1 are the midpoints of YZ,ZX,XY.
Prove 2(OX_1+OY_1+OZ_1)-(OX+OY+OZ)≥3(√5-1)/√2 . OG
Equality occurs when XYZ is an isosceles right triangle
It's actually undefined
As it's sin90/cos90= 1/0 which is a weird mathematical operation so its not defined like no actual value
But as rhl and LHL or asymptotes tend to - and + infinity
It's actually associated with infinity
I think that's not correct. Let X=(1;0), Y=(0;1), Z=(2;0). Then LHS<RHS.
Well it's my geometric interpretation of an inequality, maybe I did that incorrectly
Oh I see what i did wrong
X(a,b), Y(b,c), Z(c,a)
how do i get better at solving trigonometry identities questions, it takes me forever to make LHS = RHS, and that also by trying 50 different things
Kind of just practice
Just try to get everything in terms of one kind of trig function. So if you have a bunch of sines, cosines, or tangents, try to rewrite all in terms of say sine, or maybe all in terms of cosine, depending on which is easier
Do you have any examples you'd want to go over?
i will try this, thank you
i will let you know if i get stuck on any problem 
most of them involve
conjugates / pythagrean identity
or compound angle
start with the side that looks uglier/more complex
anyone can help me with pre calc 12 trignometry?
how do i remeber all those special angles in trig
there's this thing that someone else asked for just yday
that gets you the specials in quadrant 1
@dense current dunno if you saw this but theres a mnemonic for you if you want
One thing that I noticed is that special angles are exactly angles that are of the form rational number times half-pi, where the ratinal number has denominator at most 3
I think that denominator determines the algebraic nature of the cosine and sine values
Which is bizzare
Can someone double check my work?
lol what does those 0123 mean?
didn't i write it in the image
euler's number?
square root
oh i get it now, wait thats actually genius
did you invent that?
i have a question tho, for 45 degrees, and if you do root 2 over 2, but isnt it 1 over root 2?
Ann
bruh rly
yes
$\frac{\sqrt{a}}{a}$ and $\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}$ are equal
Ann
I'm struggling with these kinds of questions
Every time I look at an explanation it solves it in a way I don't comprehend
Figured I'd ask it here!!
There are probably several ways through a problem like that, and it's a matter of trying different things until you find something that gets you to an equation you know you can solve.
A base fact that is surely going to be relevant is to know that when you divide a right triangle in two that wall, all the three triangles you end up having (ABC, DAC, DBA) end up being similar. So I'd look for a way to exploit that similarlity.
After several minutes of trying out combinations, I landed at the proportionality 8:x = (12.2+x):8 (by similarity of ABC with DAC) which looks like it would produce at worst a quadratic equation when I multiply across ... and I know I can solve quadratics.
Okay
yeah because 8 is the hypo of the small one and x+12.2 is the hypo of the big one
Wait let me see
Similarly, x is the smallest side on the smaller one and 8 is the smallest side on the big triangle
No, 8/(12.2+x)=x/8