#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 109 of 1
a + b = 10
ab = -11d
c+d = 10a
cd = -11b
Integrate (a+b+c+d) dx when a,b,c,d ≠ 0 and are not equal also.
[No ai Allowed, just try]
Thanks guys
So now
Is it smth
1210x+c??
anyone?
X=40 y= 180 - 65 -40
X is the corresponding angle of 40 so x=40°... y+65°=180° so y=115....
The angle other than x y in the triangle formed be t
Then t and z are vertically opposite angles
So... x+y+t= x+y+z=180°
Z=25°
@neat pivot
Is this the answer?? Bcz i consider 65° wrt the line drawn from transversal
yooo i did the EXACT same thing lmao
tysm
except the wording
i kinda coord bashed rly hard
ahhh
i also thought x was 40 but i kept telling me it was 65 so i gave in tbh
Nahh ur right... It's property... Corresponding angles
Is that u in pfp??
yea
U look pretty
np
Which class question is this
Probably 6-7th
Frfr
sqrt
How to solve 2nd one?
use Cosine Rule to find c
the apply Sine Rule to find the others
Thx
np
I have a few conceptual doubts about conic sections:
- When we talk about conic sections — parabolas, ellipses, and hyperbolas — are they always formed from the same cone (just at different angles of intersection), or can they also come from different cones altogether? If two such curves come from the same cone, is there something common or shared between them that tells us they originate from that same cone? Or in coordinate geometry, does it not really matter whether they’re from the same or different cones?
- In problems like “find the locus of the midpoint of a chord of the parabola y^2 = 4x that passes through the focus” or “find the locus of the point of intersection of normals to the parabola,” we often get another parabola as the final locus. In such cases, is this new parabola geometrically related to the same cone as the original one, or is it just a mathematical curve in the coordinate plane with no direct connection to the original cone?
does someone have a formal proof that 3 planes cant enclose a volume, like i can imagine it but it feels wrong that they cant so a proof would help
I think you could look at Euler’s polyhedron formula
if the planes do enclose a volume, then that volume will be a polyhedron
yea so that gives edges = vertices + 1 all in all
max number of edges is nc2
nc2 > n+ 1 this has solutions
yea i skipped steps, do faces = 3
But yeah nc2 is number of edges
max number but hmm same thing,
Sure yeah
hmmm so that doesnt prove our initial hypothesis wrong
How can I find the cost of carpeting needed based on the room shown?
Well we know there’s up to 3 edges
A face has to be enclosed by at least 3 edges, so there’s up to 1 face
then we have <= 2 vertices
but then there’s only 1 possible edge, which means no faces at all
makes sense, thank you, took me back to the imagining but oh welll its geometry what did i expect
how does this happen I am cooked
use tan
u will do tan (37)= x/8
So you have the angle and you have the adjecent and you’re trying to solve for the opposite dos that make sense
do you know how to label each side of the triangle
do you know sin cos and tan ?
Yes
Yeah it’s not
Other way around
adjacent means next to
Yes
Cuz 5 is opposite of the angle and x is next to it
yes, why? the adjacent is the same side as the angle you are either looking for or already have
So like you just do tan of the angle is equal to opposite over adjacent
k you have to learn how to use this and maybe if you write a test you have to study p.t. to
k send the pic again
i can help
Bro remember soh cah toa
show your work
$$\tan(39) = \frac{5}{x}$$
ponkur
we'll see where you went wrong
dont type everything
untill 4.048 the most
do you know the pythagorium theorim ?
not suure
will you use a calc on the test ?
show how you got to here
k then untill the hundredth dont write everything and dont change
$$x = \frac{5}{\tan(39^\circ)} \approx \frac{5}{0.8098} \approx 6.17$$
ponkur
try it
tell us your anwser and we will help
greek srry it was accident
idk try it we wil help you
so how did you get to that answer
ye tell us how you got there in a paper on smthing
you cant just givbe an anwser lke that
mm
wdym
k you do
$$
\sin(70^\circ) = \frac{12}{x}
\quad \Rightarrow \quad
x = \frac{12}{\sin(70^\circ)}
\approx \frac{12}{0.9397}
\approx 12.77
$$
ponkur
sure
please show your working out so we can clearly see where you went wrong if you do
and point it out to you
write it in paper or latex send pic
can you give us a definition of what din cos and tan is ?
wich one is it ?
yeah you're good, but can you send us a photo of you doing the question lol
but the notes are fine
k do you want me to give you a problem ? solve it
and tell us the anwser
let me find one
send us a photo of your work
if ΕΓ=5CM and ΒΖ=6cm find the area of the 2 tgrianglesw and the square
solvbe the one i gave to you
if you solve it you are good
and i need ecxplanation to everything if you can do this you are fine
ik its basic but its good for a start
yes thts an easy example
i mean you're js skipping a few steps so
if you started yesterday that means yk everything abut finding areas and stuf
wait listen to me
you learned yester ay rite ?
right *
do you know anything about square rooots pythagorium and areas ?
if you dont know these you cant do trigonometry
the problem i gave to you has everyithng
yeah it's wrong also
yes
let me break down what you should do into steps
when you see a trigonometry question:
- label the sides of the triangles
- note the information you were given, and what you need to find
- based on the information given, you will select one of the formulae: sin, tan or cos
- you will sub in the values or lackthereof into the formula and solve for the unknown
let me do an example from the most recent question
tan
@true chasm
flipped my bad
if youre teacher say to you no calc and only gave you these
can you solve ?
and all the angles are 30 45 and 60
still is trigonometry thats the basics
like if thats the test that easy
he js needs to understand the fundamentals w these questions
and how'd you get that
do you see the photo i sent
can you show your work like that
okay
@pearl sable what grade are you ?
what are you doing now in maths
linear acceleration
convenient for nate
yes that's good
because now we can see exactly where you made a mistake
this line
is where the mistake arises
you see the fraction 10/x
you want to take
sin37 = 10/x
xsin37 = 10
x = 10/sin37
so basically what you did in the question
but you did it the wrong way around
it's always the denominator of the fraction that you do this with
any issues?
yes
yep
oh yes, your formula was wrong
see how you wrote
yeah, the algebra was correct
but the formula itself you miswrote
i never checked that that's mb
it's sinθ = opp/hyp
you wrote sinθ = hyp/opp
you see the issue?
yeah
accidently
let me show you something about fractions to help clarify
want me to do the question, but this time we don't mistype the wrong formula
yes
here you go
okay 👍
well here x represents the opposite
so we just subbed in x for the opposite
for sinθ = opp/hyp
sin37 = x/10
because
θ = 37
opp = x
hyp = 10
yes
nope
wrong
show me your work
ik what you did wrong
it's the fraction still
yep
there are two ways, only one is correct
yes
do this:
x/6 = 9
find x
you understand what i mean when i type x/6 right?
1/2 = one half
okay
i want you to give me a value for x
yes
now i want you to do this
correct, so x = ?
yes
how did you do it
9 x 6?
and do you know why that works?
it's the fundamental concept of this that you need to know for these trigonometry questions
so you're saying that if you have the x on top, multiplying the bottom number by the other side of the equation gives you a value for x?
okay great, can you hold off on the trigonometry question for a second and do this question
you're good you'll get the hang of it really quick if you know this
a = c ?
but a/b = c
nope
think back to what you did with my previous question
x/6 = 9
x = 9 x 6 right?
so now we have
a/b = c
you could interpret it that way
a doesn't equal x, but a is in the same position as x.
yes
what's the opposite of division?
this might help you visualise it
1/2 = 0.5 yes?
1 = 2/2
if you take the bottom number, 2 in this case, and multiply by 2, you get the top number on its own
so 2(1/2) = 1
2(0.5) = 1
1 = 1
or like you did with x/6
6(x/6) = 9(6)
x = 9 x 6
so it's 1 divided by two
if you want to get one, you multiply by two
1/2, i want 1
1/2 x 2
x/6, i want x
x/6 x 6
what could be one?
when i ask for the value for a, i am not looking for a number
i want you to write a = ?
it's not a number
x divided by 6, multiplied by 6 will give you x
yeah
my next question will tie directly into trigonometry i just need you to understand how to find a
if a divided by b equals c
a/b = c
then a = ?
if x divided by 6 = 9
x/6 = 9
then x = 9 x 6
x = 54
1/2 = 0.5
1 = 2 x 0.5
1 = 1
a = ?
it functions the exact same way
there doesn't need to be a number
i'll tell you
yes
correct answer
yes
that's for finding the angle, if you have two of the sides
can you do this
x = 5? no
oh excuse me x does equal 5, i wasn't expecting you to put it into the calculator
but can you write x = 10sin30
yeah
yeah so you understand
how that is the exact same thing as
yes, but i'm not too concerned about the answer
i want you to understand the theory
to then do a/b = c
a = ?
oh yeah
let me ask you this
if x/6 = 9
can i say that x = 9?
yes but with the new thing
^-1
nah you can't, we've already figured out that x = 54
if you want to know why
if we let x = 9
then it becomes
9/6 = 9
1.5 = 9
which does not make sense
click 2nd function
i'll show you how to do it
yep
it is
send photo of your calculator
try pressing shift cos
see if it shows cos^-1
if it doesn't try alpha cos
the answer is 53, 9.999 is wrong
you know how to do the question?
is there any way to take the inversecosine of 6/10 without a calculator?
start by identifying the adj, hyp and opp i think
i wouldn't know
np
do the exact same thing as you did for every other question
and show me how far you get to
it?
no
i don't want an answer
i want a line from your work
yes but you realise if you get the answer wrong and you don't show any working out then it's the exact same as just plucking a number from your head in the eyes of the examiner
you need to show your though process behind the answer
go line by line
how you would do this, let the angle = x
send the lines
who said anything about a calculator
i don't want you to get an answer
i want you to show me what you do
im sorry to butt in, but do you think this would be ok? Im learning the samething coincidentally, and was wondering whether this would be correct? the image has my work
i didn't get 39.79
i rounded a lot, do you see any errors in my work?
your methodology is overly complicated, but it should work let me do it myself your way and see where you went wrong
yeah it was purely your rounding
it works otherwise
although inputting what you did would get 39.72, not 39.79
maybe my error in rounding or writing
probably
look bro you gotta go line by line
i just wrote hypotenuse = 25.612, instead of 26
so it was more precise
label the sides of the triangle
figure out which formula you can use with the sides you do have values for
then i want you to write out the equation
example: cosx = 20/25.612
nah
bro stop trying to skip to the answer you need to know how this shit works 😭
maybe grab a paper and pencil?
once you get one question down, the rest will be easier
exactly
i want you to know how it works so then you can do all of them
show me what you've done
i don't want a random number i want to see your work
we believe innyou nate!!!
let me know
honestly you're moving too fast, you shouldn't be finding the angle on your first day of trigonometry
but it is what it is and you're here now so
i would cry 🤑🤑💔💔💔
i don't want you to give me an answer i want you to show me what you've done
YAY
you know the theorem of pythagoras ?
js stick to what you've been doing this entire time
there's no need
broo pls just treat this question the exact same way you've treated every other one
no.
you won't get an answer
i just want you to show me your work
idgaf
? no
show MOREEE work
what did you type in the claculator
you can probably express that as an equation (?)
The work you shwoed shows how you got the hypotenuse
In order to see how you got to the answer
bro he has no idea what the theorem of pythagoras is let's stay away from that it's just piling more and more onto him 💔
the steps in between is what we need(?)
💔
@true chasm do the question like this
but this time you have two sides and let the angle = x
and i want you to get to a line akin to this
||Now you have hypotenuse 👅👅👅based on this image you know which trig function the angle x is, cos. Cos is the adjecent/hypotenuse and you have those values, now you can make a equation akin the the equation above! In the upper example, the angle is known, (37) and we are finding sin. Instead, we put the angle as x and we are finding the cosine ||
explanation(?) not very good
well yeah
it is tan
what's your point
ok bro let's restart
i don't get the confusion
you sent this image right?
these are the formulae if looking for an angle
you literally js sub in the values and you're done
yes we gave up on that you spent like 20 minutes and are still yet to show me any SHRED of rough work
I see how i overcomplicated it 🙏🏽🙏🏽now
broo idgaf you're going to get it wrong i want you to just show me what you did
it's okay ik you're js gonna tell me caculator
so we move on
let's just sub in values for a formula
- label the sides of the triangle
- find the right formula
- sub in the numbers
- input into a calculator
ok great
After this homework please come back and do pythagoras 😍😍
pythagoras my goat 🤤🤤🤤
see this is what i wanted
this is the incorrect line
so basically
you js split up the tanx into x and tan-1
move the tan-1 onto the other side of the equation
i'll call it tan-1, but js keep it in mind it's ^-1
and then
you put tan^-1(20/16) into your calculator
and you have the angle
done ✅
yes 51.34 😄
exactly bruh i told you ts like 10 months ago
it's right tho so idk what to tell you lol
whats the ans help
It doesnt tell u the correct answer?
thats wonderful
idk is it correct?
so close
what you need help w
i can't really see the sstreet lines
can we have the points a and b?
What is -800 100 and point B is 100 -400
I also think the answer is 450. I just don’t know how it is for a question five
i can't see line l
It’s the white line
it can't be
oh it's just any line
np
your midpoint ain't working for what i've plotted
green dot is the midpoint
if A = (-800,100) and B = (100,-400)
the distance of these points is this i think (?)
Yea i don’t think this is right but thanks
i got my answers, they line up with the coordinates you gave for A and B
Q4
m = (-5)/9
|AB| = 943.4m (rounded)
Q5
perpendicular of -5/9 is 9/5, m = 9/5
5y = 9x + 2400
So it is 450?
Buy I don’t know how to shoe the work
That’s what my teacher wants the most
wym by 450
i can show you the work
i can run you through it
wrong img
No but we did it with no graph
480
lemme do it rq
wait nah send me the question again i'm lost
@true chasm
Wait, so can you work out the problems like, what formulas did you use?
step 1: calculate slop of AB
A = (-800, 100)
x1 y1
B = (100, -400)
x2 y2
m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m = (-400 - 100)/(100 + 800)
m = -500/900
m = -5/9
step 2: find the distance between a and b
|AB| = sqrt (x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2
|AB| = sqrt (800)^2 + (-500)^2
|AB| = 943.4
step 3:
find the perpendicular slope (inverse fraction), 9/5
test to prove that they are perpendicular
-5/9 x 9/5 = -1, correct they are perpendicular
step 4:
find the midpoint of AB
((x1 + x2)/2 , (y1+y2)/2)
( -350, -150)
step 5:
find the equation of the line
(-350, -150) m = 9/5
x1 y1
y - y1 = 9/5(x - x1)
y -(-150) = 9/5(x - (350))
y + 150 = 9/5(x + 350)
5y + 750 = 9(x + 350)
5y + 750 = 9x + 3150
5y = 9x +2400
( y-intercept = 2400/5 = 480 )
Answers:
Q4
m = (-5)/9
|AB| = 943.4m (rounded)
Q5
perpendicular of -5/9 is 9/5, m = 9/5
5y = 9x + 2400
what's the question gang
so label the sides
adj and hyp
cosA = adj/hyp
cos x = 10/14
x = cos^-1(10/14)
it's simple
Wher did u get 9/5 the slope of AB is -1/2
slope of AB is -5/9
i showed you my working
come on you know how to do it
yes
fire
can i go to sleep 🥺
Cos^-1 5/7
Does anyone know how to solve this? Prove the ABC triangle (lhs=rhs)
,rccw
Ehh
Sine rule, Cosine rule, Area formula A=abc/4R and heron fomulas
Or just use A+B+C=180 and do a bunch of algebra
i used a+b+c=180 on lhs but im not sure on what to do on rhs.
Maybe move the 2 to the other side to then divide by -2, but after that its gonna be -cosAcosBcosC, not sure what to do after that
I don't like algebra
Doing all of that seems boring, I think you'll find a way it's just hard to see
,w expand (a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a+c-b)(c+b-a)(a^2+b^2+c^2)/4
Eh that doesn't seem easier
You can Google this (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4011258/proving-sin2a-sin2b-sin2c-2-cos-a-cos-b-cos-c-2?noredirect=1). If you don’t want to look at the full thing, the tldr is ||double angle|| then ||sum to product||
ig I have this question in my tb
start taking it from rhs
and prove it
gradually you will come till LHS and you find that LHS=rhs
and taking from RHS is easiest all the time
Tried from rhs but its not possible
This is from lhs but i got stuck
Ignore the A+B+C
what well
Huh
thats what im saying
Upper one or lower?
wdym?
Prove is it?
yeah prove
The top one is the question?
Gimme 5 min
Hm just change sin^2A to cos2A
Use the formula
Cos2A = 1 - 2sin^2A
If you still can’t do it i would solve it
solve it if you dont mind, my trig midterm is tmrw 🥲
If anyone else solves it id be grateful 🥹
Solution is right here
Sry bro i had a lecture
Do you still need it?
@thorn pier
Alr gimme some min
@thorn pier
Let me know if there is any step you don’t understand
i love u bro 🥹 tysm
In which standard are you studing rn?
Wdym?
Also how does cos(A+B) become cos(C)?
-cosc
A+B+C= π so A+B=π-C .... Cos (A+B)= cos (π-C) ...... We know cos(π-O) is -cosO
O is theta
Ahh ok
Class
12th
imo its not that hard but the teacher gives us ridiculous questions
There is a geometry problem that, in my opinion, pretty hard to solve by synthetic methods, this solution is the only thing i came up with help, so mb someone can solve it in a shorter and simpler way possible ?
!nopdf
Please post images (such as PNGs or JPGs) of the question rather than other filetypes such as PDFs which have to be downloaded. Non-image downloads can potentially contain viruses or other security risks.
Sorry pal, can you provide a pic
Someone posted this problem on this forum, without a source, I tried to solve it, but nothing worked, later I returned to it several times over the year and tried to solve it, but it didn’t work, then I turned to the forum and one person gave me these lemmas, I proved them, but I couldn’t complete the solution, then he helped me and in the end I got this, so far this is the most difficult and longest problem for me, I think it’s from some Chinese Olympiad, judging by the resulting solution, so I believe that a more natural solution can be found.
ehhhh, I feel like I'm gonna waste serveral hours of my life solving it
Sorry
I can't help u
It's okay, I would never have solved it myself because I'm not a good geometer and I don't study modern methods of solving problems, so let someone who wants to figure it out try to solve it.
Guys who created trigo
welcome to the history of maths
the answer is usually some culture / civilisation for something as old as trigo
It's a Greek word ig
I think aaryabhatta gave the foundation
Aryabhatta gave SIN also
I think
the law of cosines is in Euclid's Elements
but you're right, Aryabhata and other Indian mathematicians made significant progress in trigonometry
Wait let me share my book page
Idea of sin was of Aryabhatta
correct
but I mean if you can trust Wikipedia,
The first trigonometric table was apparently compiled by Hipparchus of Nicaea (180 – 125 BC), who is now consequently known as "the father of trigonometry."[17] Hipparchus was the first to tabulate the corresponding values of arc and chord for a series of angles.
It's debate on who started
Because it developed over time
that's my whole point
In Greek tri means 3 gono means sides and metry is to measure or work on
I guess the word comes from greek
it's a bit silly cause Greek influenced European languages
so there are plenty of other mathematical developments that were not known to the West for a long time
Yep
m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are two points on the line
angles actually not sides
I was talking abt maths u sent science
He cover everything
Math Physic, Chem, Bio
he covers everything
hes mah pookie
Can u tell name i don't click to random links
ehh
This video tutorial provides a basic intro into trigonometry. It explains how to evaluate trigonometric functions like sin, cos, and tan using soh cah toa and right triangle trigonometry. It explains how to use reference angles and coterminal angles to evaluate trig functions such as sec, csc, and cot.
Trigonometry - Free Formula Sheet: ...
Thanks
Difference of y upon difference of x
Okkkk... But Indian scientist Aryabhatta is also considered to be a Pioneer of trigonometry
Nahh
It was the argument going above
I just stated the meaning of trigonometry word
Where it came from
But i wasn't sure
I mentioned that
I've never asked myself why's it actually JG
the Jorganic Ghemistry tutor?
Do you guys have any lectures/books etc on stuff for conic geometry
Especially regarding the properties of parabolas, hyperbolas and ellipses
Also question
How do you find the length of a common chord between two circles without going through the whole find eqn of chord by radical axes, find where it intersects the circles and then find its length
U can simplify find PDFs of notes on Google
Best is youtube
Ig I'll just have to go through questions on my own
Yea
start from basics
cuz properties are vast
u may feel low solving heavy questiona
properties are too much to mug up
I'll have to speedrun that shit 🤧
İm kind of bad at trigonometry any ideas on how i should go about learning it ?
Learn circles and triangles and how they relate
Learn identities and try to prove them
np!
aaaaahhhhhhhhhh
In the future, please show what you’ve done so far when asking for help - it gives us more context of where to help you (and saves our time from explaining things unnecessarily). \ \
Let the line $x=k$ intersect $BC$ at $E$ and $AB$ at $F$. Then, $\triangle BEF$ is a right triangle with an area that is half of $\triangle ABC$. What I’d do is start by finding the coordinates of $F$ (in terms of $k$).
Civil Service Pigeon
Further hint: ||A = bh/2 on both BEF and ABC||
wait in ur solution are there similar triangles included
cuz i was doing that before i asked and i got a number greater than zero
BD = 3 - (-5) = 8
Area(ABC) = ½×8×2 = 8
Area(ECB) = 8/2 = 4
½×(k+5)×h = 4
h(k+5) = 8
h = 8/(k+5)
ECB ~ ADB
h/2 = (k+5)/8
(8/(k+5))/2 = (k+5)/8
4/(k+5) = (k+5)/8
(k+5)² = 32
k²+10k+25 = 32
k²+10k-7 = 0
k = (-10±sqrt(128))/2
k = (-10±8sqrt(2))/2
k = -5±4sqrt(2)
k < 0 (since to the left of the origin)
thus k = -5-4sqrt(2)
is it your solution?
Is this the problem you need to solve?
X=k drop a perpendicular to the base and consider distance k from point b or drop another perpendicular from A to BC and consider a trapezium
Apply the given coordinate to find k
Find area of triangle
Find equation of line AB
Put x equals k
Find y coordinate in terms of k
Now find the area of the new triangle and equate it to half of the area of the triangle ABC
To find k, note that the total area of triangle ABC is ½(base)(height)=½(5+3)(2)=8, and the line x=k cuts the base from x=-5 to x=3, creating two smaller triangles that share the same height-to-base ratio since the top vertex is at (3,2). The area from x=-5 to x=k is proportional to (k+5)² because area scales with the square of the horizontal distance when the vertex is not centered. Setting half the total area equal gives (k+5)²/(3+5)²=½ → (k+5)²/64=½ → (k+5)²=32 → k+5=√32 → k=-5+4√2 ≈ 0.66.
Holy sh1t i js spent 10 minutes on that
🤣
Yes
Really? And what problem do you need help with?
Mnh...
and the resolution of this problem?
I mean, I'm looking for a more optimal and suitable solution for this, maybe using some kind of plane transformation or projective approach. I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area, but I could understand the proposed solution, even if it's a simple coordinate count.
lemma 1: Let E,F be the other intouch points, let D' be the reflection of D over EF then A,D',Q colinear
Lemma 2: Let M be the midpoint of minor arc BC, let I' be the reflection of I over BC, then A'I'M colinear
Now let G be the midpoint of DD', foot from A to EF. Project D,D',G,inf onto (ABC) thru A
U get (AD int (ABC),Q,AG int (ABC),M)=-1
Project this through D onto (ABC)
Let N be midpoint of arc BAC , then easy angle chase/well known that ND and AG meet on (ABC)
Now project this bundle thru D onto (ABC).
U get (A,AQ int (ABC)=X, N,sharky)=-1
but now if we project (I,I',D,inf) onto (ABC) from M we get (A,A',sharky,N)=-1
Thus from (1) and (2) we have AQ int(ABC)=A'||
Thank you, that’s what I meant, i will analyse and ask you if smth is missing for me
okay first of all...
Are you sure these are your solutions?
Yes, this guy helped me to solve this and provide the picture, i wrote about it above
Ehh well, Master Kerem Karam is a friend of my own teacher
The solutions there are from Master Kerem Karaman.
Ok, that sounds interesting, he’s really good and experienced in geometry
Without him I would never solve this problem
Okay, but I don't see the part where you sent any of your own resolutions.
only the solutions of kerem karam
Do you guys have book recommendations for Algebra and Trigonometry ?
I wrote my resolutions in post with problem, but none of them are actually were applied in the solution, In fact, the solution is completely his,
But I didn't expect anyone to be particularly interested, so I wrote it for simplicity's sake
Okay, but you just told me that the solutions are yours...
.
Yes and I'm not making excuses. I fully acknowledge the authorship of this solution with respect for the person, and I haven't shared it anywhere other than this channel. I decided to write it this way for simplicity, so I don't have to explain the entire situation again.
So you're telling me that you decided to say that the solutions were yours (and you didn't attach any of your own solutions) just to avoid explaining who the real author was....?
I want you to understand that this is not the first time that solutions have been "stolen" from Master Kerem Karam.
Actually, I didn't originally claim his solution, but I said that he helped me solve the problem completely, and I wouldn't have solved it without him. However, when you asked me a second time, I thought that since the person hadn't seen the original post, I would simply tell them that it was my solution without implying any copyright verification.
Well, that's a bit malicious, to be honest... I guess if I ask Master Kerem Karam if that's true, there shouldn't be any problems...
You could, i can share our chat in reddit if u need
And I reiterate, this isn't the first time that Master Keren Karam's solutions have been intentionally stolen, which is why I'm taking protective measures...
Okay, fine, I won't go into that further, just always be careful to give the respective credits to the authors of those problems.
🫡
Ok, still thank you for your solution
By the way, do you know where i can get better in geometry, you said that Master Kerem Karam was your teacher’s friend and actually you know geometry on a high level, so, I am really interested where to study like this or at least some sources if you don’t mind to answer
My teacher and Master Kerem Karam have many years of experience in that type of geometry, so it is with patience my friend
Coz I don’t really have teacher or tutor to experience geometry
I don't consider myself to be at such a high level in geometry either, that solution is partially mine, since a friend and I did it a while ago
I didn't have one at the time either, I met my teacher by chance and he agreed to teach me.
@obsidian hornet A good way to start is by studying the Clark Kimberlin Triangle Encyclopedia.
👍
Ok, thank you, it would be nice if i’ll meet someone like your teacher one day
And above all, practice. The lemmas used are little known. With practice, you will encounter situations like this and from there the lemmas arise. You can learn through practice.
Practice makes perfect
🫡
Additionally, Have you tried using the method of moving points to solve problems?
The translation method is useful for certain cases, although I prefer to solve using strokes and lemmas.
Also if you learn about special triangles and special complementary triangles, they can be a good tool.
You can also find some geometric olympics tricks, especially from Russian, Turkish or Chinese publishers.
Yes, thats true, but to make sure that you understood me in the right way i meant such like this methods: let we have ABC triangle, I - incenter, there is a well-known fact for point F on the picture is that FG = FH + FJ, but its a trashy thing to solve it using bisector properties and etc. Instead lets set up a linear function f = ax+by+c and using lemma thats if f(a) = f(b) = const => f(c) = const for any c on AB line, omitting details, thats enough to check this for two any special cases and we can choose D and E points instaed F and for them this is obvious so the problem is done, is this called translation methods?
I know what you're talking about, but as I said, I'm more of a geometrician. For example, what you mentioned isn't difficult to solve geometrically... it's just a generalization of Viviani's theorem; it can be demonstrated with areas...
okay, i understand
And those translation methods aren't always going to work for higher-level problems; that would be pushing it too far...
As I told you, if you want to learn about it, in Clark Kimberly's encyclopedia they are detailed, including the translation methods.
Sure, thanks
has anyone tried representing the net of a cube this way before? it's pretty simple but i don't think i've seen this done
4-0-1-5-4
| | | | |
6-2-3-7-6
i was trying to write out a representation and realized you can make it into a tiling or a sort of loop
when tiled as a grid of squares, each vertex has one duplicate connection since otherwise you'd need to make connections bend or cross
i also then tried doing it differently and got the graph in image 4 which is functionally the same
That seems to be a cube without top and bottom sides.
effectively yeah
but those faces are implied since it's cyclical
no clue if this is useful at all anyway but i figured it would be best to show it anyway
im sure theres some graph theory to this but i haven't really studied graph theory much so idk
It's not what I would understand a "net" to be -- e.g. Wikipedia's definition specifies "an arrangement of non-overlapping edge-joined polygons in the plane that can be folded (along edges) to become the faces of the polyhedron", so if some of the faces are missing, we don't have a net.
for the tiling yeah
since you can't have 'curvature' or whatever it'd be called if it's a plane
<@&268886789983436800>
Dude wrong channel
?? how
its geometry
its meant for simple geometry, not geometry on steroids
like sine law and stuff
Coordinate lines making my head hurt🥀
hi
hi
can u help?
ok
your answer is 0.525, but is 001 if its approximated
hi
what have you tried?
That's not what I meant
You are given one side and 2 angles and you are required to get another side. How do you do this?
Calculator allowed??
Just do sin 55/8=sin 43/C
Just remember that the side opposite to angle A is a
N B is b
C is c
So i used sinA/a = sinC/c
Pretty easy
So AC T BE means that they intersect at a 90 degree angle, same with AC T CG
So using that info then CG is parralel with BE
And if BE and CG are parralel then AF crosses through both at the same angle
Just plug in the data in the sine rule formula, you will get it
Exclude the B part cuz we don't have data for B
Easy,
BE and CD are parallel
FA is transverse
So by property of corresponding angles angles BEA and CDA are equal
And angle CDA And FDG are equal by vertically opposite angles
Use transitivity, hence proved
Prove the triangles ADE & ACD similar.... Angle ACB equals ADC by similarly.... ADC and FDG are equal by vertically opposite angles... That means FDG equals BEA
show also Fig. 15.4
i forgot the standard equation for ellipse
,,\frac{(x-h)^2}a+\frac{(y-k)^2}b=1
i forgot the squares
glass
Perhaps fig 15.4 is the classical proof that a cut-off cone is an ellipse.
Fionna The Unemployed
you may ask if I'm okay, I'm not please send help 
i think the sols of mine have some flaws, ehh whatever
ahh I did the mapping wrong
, ehh I'm too lazy to keep latexing
nvm I think the mapping is right
can someone help meh
yeh, but for these problem why not open a help channel #❓how-to-get-help
helpers will explain things more detail here
Take lhs
Or rhs
Convert tan into sin /cos
Cross multiply
But I think SMTH is crazy abt this question.... It's equality doesn't exist
divide both numer and denom in lhs by cos(x) we have the rhs=-lhs that's truthly weird I agree
it's not true
Something's wrong abt the question
<@&268886789983436800>
can someone help me?
using the law of sines:
sinx/8 = sin43/7 (notice the angle is always opposite the side)
sinx = (8sin43)/7
x =arcsin(8sin43/7)
Yep I think so
sin(x)/32 = sin(84)/34
sin(x) = 32*sin(84)/34
so ~0.99
around 0.99
wait oops mb i forgot to arcsin
natebate lol
so im just in grade 9 but i thought that Sine, Cosine and Tangent were only for right triangles
nope
huh
theyre for all triangles
ok 👍
ok
they start off trig with right triangles because it clearly represnts
uhhhh
the stuff
also nate its around 58.82
ty
so they still kind of work with the other ones but it's easier and nicer to see with right triangles
yeah
it said it was wrong
wth
wait lemme check
so you have arcsin(34*sin(84)/32)
uh
oh shoot
flip the 32 and 34
arcsin is sin^-1 right
yup
I saw some of the math work for the grd 11s on the whiteboards in my math class and saw some stuff that basically said a fraction to the -1st is just switching the numerator and denominator. Is this correct?
broe what
why is my calculaator tweaking
it said 58.82
but when i used google calculator it says
69.39
69
i think i need a new one
yup
heres a more generalized way to define it
did you type it out the same?
yeah
ok dumb question but i had to ask
(x/y)^n where n < 0 = y^n/x^n
ok
i think i made sense of that
so if (3/4)^-1 is 4^-1/3^-1
oh wait im stupid
= y^-n/x^-n
mb
so for example if u had (2/3)^-3
it would be 27/8
so (3/4)^-1 is 4^1/3^1
yeah
so its just the reciprical
yup
cool thank you so much
complete the square
start from (x^2 - 2x) + (y^2 - 4y) = 0, and then you get the equation of a circle
which translates into finding the rightmost point of the circle
XD
tuah
Bro i told u the solution to a similar problem like this yesterday
..
It's an equation of circle
Find its centre, radius
Then just add x coordinates of centre with radii
Is calculator allowed
Yeah u need it for arcsin
im year 1 where can i find trigonometric questions specifically differentiations and inverse questions that i can try to solve
U want a book?
I can tell u smth of higher level
I'll be glad to take a book aswell
Black book
I don't know if it's available where u stay
If u want online sources which r paid specifically for math
Download cengage app
Try their questions
Depending on ur level decide
Someone pls help with 11th and 12th
Send the complete question
What do we have to find
Show me the main question
Use sine rule
Using law of sines, c/sinC = b/sinB so you can find the other two angles and find the last one using law of cosines
Yepp
@worldly zephyr
It's a similar kind of question
Just use the cosine rule in the last
Cos A= b^2+c^2-a^2/2bc
njah i goty it and went to sleep
Thank you 😊
👍
answer is 1+√5. well treat it like quadratic equations of y and use quadratic formula.
then use the fact that discriminate must be greater than or equal to 0 and then it's over
Using eye
?
It depends on the scenario
In coordinate we have some ways like dot product, product of tangent m1•m2=-1
In Euclidean it is quite a lot
Pythagoreans, 90° angle
Prove that it's square, a rectangle,.....
I mean it's depend on question and situation.
if it's follow the condition of parallel line then line is parallel.
you can also use vectors if you can. I mean dot product ab cos(theta)
bro.. this book is kinda bad tbh
i have solved the questions
many are not correct tbh
It's the best
Show the questions
I am so dumb at geometry and my tutor always rages at me about that...
I have struggled with it but @rotund drum helped me with it
can someone help me out?
whenever you have 2 sides and know the angle between them, you can use the cosine rule to find the 3rd side
you are given the rule in the question, you just have to plug a,b and the angle C, and square root to find c
Dude you have the formula and values so just plug in the data
pls help 🙁
This geometry or trigonometry?
trig
Oh nvm
im cooked
Is calculator allowed?
If yes, dude use the cosine rule given below the question
Where LHS is to be calculated
And cosC is 73°
yea
im unsure of the way its supposed to be in order
What can I do to make my scale drawing?
Well like since you took the scale as 1cm = 3.45 ft , shouldn't the white board be like 6.96 * 1.16 (cm)
This as well
Hmm, I don't think there's a slick way to do that other than just bashing it -- more algebra than it's geometry, really.
The graph gives you this information:
- f(0) = 0
- f(2) = -3
- the y-coordinate of the vertex is 1.
- b > 0
- a < 0
The first three gives you three equations in the three unknowns a,b,c that you can solve. (It is simplest to start by eliminating c before you start writing down the other ones).
You'll end up solving a quadratic, and one of the inequalities will help disambiguate which of its roots you need.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
jajajaja
I think the problem becomes much easier once you understand bearings