#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 89 of 1
now expand the right side
and then the only way two complex numbers are equal to each other is if the real parts are equal and the imaginary parts are equal
so set the real parts equal to each other (this gives you the identity for cos(a+b))
and the set the imaginary parts equal to each other (this gives you the identity for sin(a+b))
lemme know if you have any trouble with that
a(x + iy) * b(x + iy)
(ab)(x² + 2ixy - y²)??
In this question, the last part " Prove that M moves along a circle"
Does this mean you have to prove M is concylic?
guys when you are working on egmo/any geometry book do you take time to rewrite the theorem on paper or you just use paper to do the problems?
pretty sure solvable even without knowing any lengths
first step easy find yellow angle
then this angle in terms of alpha
this other angle
and this last angle
ax was a single variable
you cant split it into a * x
ax is a single name
try again
yes, now do this
set real parts equal and imaginary parts equal
hi
Hi, can u help me understand a trig question?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Ok but like u could just be a student wanting help
Anyway, it'd be nice if u can
Should i post here or in #help
Nvm
I'm in #help-15 🙏🏼
Im not sure
axbx - ayby + i(axby + aybx)]
dont forget the other side of the equation
cis (a+b) = cis a * cis b
cos (a+b) + i sin(a+b) = axbx - ayby + i(axby + aybx)]
ty ill look into it
okay so I know there has to be a formula that lets you calculate the lengths of the sides of a trapezoid if you know the 4 angles and the length of the median
i mean if you know the angles you know the shape
and if you know the shape just knowing the median or any other length will give you exact dimensions
so what is the formula?
By median what do you mean
I mean yeah just split the whole thing into a square and triangles
Ok
Assume a trapezoid is two triangles and a square
Line AB is the shorter length
Line CD is the longer length
And they are joined by lines AC and BD
AB is parallel to CD
And each of the points have an angle
If we know all of the angles
Then
Hold on I’m thinking
Ok assume we know the length of AB
As x
You can do sin c to find the height
But
That’s assuming the diagonal of this triangle is 1
Uhhh
I’m thinking
Oh
I figured it out
Split the square into triangles
Four triangles
Not 2
the base of each triangle is x/2
Actually two triangle can work
No wait it can’t
Maybe
I’ll go with four
Four triangles
Line drawn from A to a point on line CD that’s directly under point B
And the same with point A
I’m going to draw this and find a result because this isn’t working
Ok so it’s not possible to use the length of AB to predict the rest of the trapezoid
Since it is just the distance between the triangles
And has no effect on the dimensions of the triangles
sorry i realized you need more than just the median
but what about having the legth of the median
and also the length of the line connecting the mid points of the two parallel sides?
along with the 4 angles
I did some stuff
Also you only need angle C and D plus either line AB or line CD
This is the formula that probably works
But that’s assuming you know AC
I’m going to work on if you know BD
Ok I searched up what a median is in a trapezoid
There’s another 3 formulas for me to make now
Oh wait if you do know the median
Nvm taht doesn’t work
The median is just simpler to use
But you still need one more length
Yeah that works
Oh, isnt isin(a+b) = i(axby + aybx)?
Then the other one should be cos(a + b) = axbx - ayby
Then this
Just substitute
Right?
yep!
sorry this has been so fragmented
hopefully you're still following
now that you know the derivations of the cos and sin addition formulas, make sure you review them
do this derivation front to back a couple times to make sure you really understand the idea
and then you'll never have to memorize these ever again
Thanks
@dense carbon sorry I meant knowing the median
and the other bimedian or basically the line that connects the midpoints of the parallel side (the median connects the non-parallel sides)
and of course the 4 angles
Then it'll be in terms of alpha not a constant
Welp I made a formula using only the median
The bi median is basically useless for me
but it requires knowing one of the sides along with the median right?
if you just know the median and the other bimedian is what i am curious about
Ohhh
That’s what you meant
There probably is a way but I’m too lazy rn
@solid needle I know you already told me a simpler way to prove what I was trying to prove
But, I rechecked my previous lomg message and redid it again
cos(a-b):
cos(a-b) = e^[i(a-b)] + e^[-i(a-b)]/2
[e^(ia-ib) + e^(ib-ia)]/2
cos(a)cos(b):
[e^(ia) + e^(-ia)][e^(ib) + e^(-ib)]/4
[e^(ia + ib) + e^(ia - ib) + e^(-ia + ib) + e^(-ia - ib)]/4
{e^[i(a+b)] + e^[i(a-b)] + e^[-i(a - b)] + e^[-i(a+b)]}/4
e^(ix) = cos(x) + isin(x)
e^(ix) - cos(x) = isin(x)
e^(ix) - {[e^(ix) + e^(-ix)]/2} = isinx
[2e^(ix) - e^(ix) - e^(-ix)]/2 = isinx
e^(ix) - e^(-ix)/2 = isinx
-i[e^(ix) - e^(-ix)]/2 = sinx
sin(a)sin(b):
{-i[e^(ia) - e^(-ia)]/2}{-i[e^(ib) - e^(-ib)]/2}
-[e^(ia) - e^(-ia)][e^(ib) - e^(-ib)]/4
[e^(-ia)-e^(ia)][e^(ib) - e^(-ib)]/4
[e^(-ia+ib) - e^(-ia-ib) - e^(ia+ib) + e^(ia-ib)]/4
{e^[-i(a-b)] - e^[-i(a+b) - e^[i(a+b)] + e^[i(a-b)]}/4
cos(a)cos(b) + sin(a)sin(b):
{e^[i(a+b)] + e^[i(a-b)] + e^[-i(a - b)] + e^[-i(a+b)] + e^[-i(a-b)] - e^[-i(a+b)] - e^[i(a+b)] + e^[i(a-b)]}/4
{e^[i(a-b)] + e^[-i(a - b)] + e^[-i(a-b)] + e^[i(a-b)]}/4
{2e^[i(a-b)] + 2e^[-i(a-b)]}/4
{e^[i(a-b)] + e^[-i(a-b)]}/2
{e^[i(a-b)] + e^[-i(a-b)]}/2 = cos(a-b)```
I was just getting confused with a lot of signs
Is this right
that is a lot to check
unfortunately i dont have time to check
it is far easier to just substitute b= -b
cos(a+b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b
we know that cos x = cos -x and -sin x = sin -x
so
cos(a-b) = cos a cos -b - sin a sin -b
= cos a cos b + sin a sin b
done
but if you really really really want to check, i recommend shoving each line into wolfram alpha
every line is a true identity, so any line you paste into wolfram alpha should output "True" if its correct
Hmm alright, when I get home, Ill do
I did the same with sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + cos(a)sin(b)
sin(a) = [-i(e^(ia) - e^(-ia)]/2
sin(b) = [-i(e^(ib) - e^(-ib)]/2
cos(a) = [e^(ia) + e^(-ia)]/2
cos(b) = [e^(ib) + e^(-ib)]/2
sin(a)cos(b):
[-i[e^(ia) - e^(-ia)][e^(ib) + e^(-ib)]/4
[-ie^(ia) + ie^(-ia)][e^(ib) + e^(-ib)]/4
{-ie^[i(a+b)] - ie^[i(a-b)] + ie^[-i(a-b)] + ie[-i(a+b)]}/4
cos(a)sin(b):
Eh, just copy but flip the variables
{-ie^[i(a+b)] - ie^[-i(a-b)] + ie^[i(a-b)] + ie[-i(a+b)]}/4
Add:
{-ie^[i(a+b)] - ie^[i(a-b)] + ie^[-i(a-b)] + ie[-i(a+b)]}/4 + {-ie^[i(a+b)] - ie^[-i(a-b)] + ie^[i(a-b)] + ie[-i(a+b)]}/4
{-2ie^[i(a+b)] + 2ie^[-i(a+b)]}/4
-i{-ie^[i(a+b)] - e^[-i(a+b)]}/2
-i{e^[i(a+b)] - e^[-i(a+b)]}/2 = sin(a+b)```
im still in yr 10 and learnign like basic trig functions like tan theta = sin theta over cos theta is ther any other stuff i should be aware of or??
i'd say understand what sin cos and tan represent in the unit circle
and some identities
would be nice to already know some values too for some angles
thanks!!!
5sin2x - 11cosx = 11sinx -7
Gentlemen, can you tell me how such problems are solved?
What's the question
You just look out for identities you can match it to, to get your desired answer
I want to know what x is equal to
guys when using the cosinesentence and the degree is over 90 degrees do i need to do something to it or am i remembering wrong? can i just put -2abCos(120*) for example
no need to do anything to it
you will end up adding stuff because Cosine between 90 and 180 is negative and negative*negative in fact which makes sense because the angle is so large
thanks @worn scroll
From here i guess you’ll be able to solve further and find x
You’ll have to find the solutions from the two sinx+cosx equations separately**
thanks
wym
oh
well if i just know the lengths i'd probably find one angle
otherwise if i know coordinates you can either use vectors or matrices
sad
bro doesnt know
hold on gotta order some food
alr
i cant express in terms of just 1 variable right
do i need to use the cosine thing
Ryse
where is a and b 😭
i replaced them with 180 - c is that wrong
oh no clue idk if its right
cos c-180 is just -cosc
sin c - 180 is just uhh yeah - sin
$-cos^2 c - sin^2 c$ erm what the sigma
Ryse
Ryse
i did get a little confused there lol
trigonometry makes me wanna kms
Someone help me in private for a simple trig problem please
Ok
Ambiguous simple trigonometry porblem the teachers says I'm wrong how to counter argue
The problem is the following
The angle of elevation when 50 meters of rope have been released is 37 degrees, which is the height at which the kite is located.
I asked ai and got the addressed pictures as answer
Teacher says 50 meters should ve adjacent side
Vanellope von Schmugz
Real is what is
Should take both as what is
It's exactly what I did but the teacher said that I was wrong
Then how do I convince a teacher
Because she says the problem is wrong
My answer
It's all good I did the calculations with very accurate results
Why did they assume that the triangle with side of r, r, and 50√2 is a right triangle?
is there more context...?
just from the context here it doesn't seem like they would be able to assume that
is it not just given info for the problem?
I need to find the area of the shape. And the book said that to find the area above the rectangle I need to (¼ × area of circle with radius of r minus the right triangle with side of r and r)
I don't understand why the isoceles triangle in that problem is considered a right triangle
it just gave a picture and told you how to find the area and thats it?
They told you it's a right triangle
Yeah sadly
No context provided
so like there was no initial problem
It's told only in the answer sheet
what is rhis?
I assume the little symbol thing in that angle is indicating it's a right triangle
oh, so there is just a picture in the book and then an answer sheet that says that^?
did it even number this as a problem?
maybe the angle between r and r is 90
i ain never seen that symbolize right triangle but 🫠
dá de forçar a aparecer um triangulo reto ai não?
translate from portuguese
what language is that?
Yeah that what I confused about
Why did they suddenly assume that the isoceles is a right triangle
well, it was the only way i think
i would say they can't, unless they give information in allat text but i can't read it so 
fr
is this question solvavel?
The text only said the function of the window 
whats the anwser
thats a lot of text for just saying "the function of a window" 
the actual answer, or the answer they gave?
the actual answer is that the problem is not solveable since you don't know the curvature of that arc 👍
unless its drawn to scale in which case i guess you could do it analytically but :l
measure it LOL
talvez no enunciado esteja falando sobre
translate from portuguese
oh
what language is that?
oh never mind
indonisian
a few months ago
i had an exam
and on the exam had a question like
how much is $\sqrt3+\sqrt2$
Argand
and the options was
yes
did it say to estimate?
but the "anwser" they give was b
or ask which one is closest?
me either but then, what is that thing doing there? And there's no way to solve the problem without knowing that angle, so
💀
I feel scared because this question is in the previous year entrance examination in my country 
well
indonisia lore:
well
we can respond this
Why did they make such a unsolveable wuestion in the entrance exam 💀
if that exact question with no extra context was given that means it is almost certainly correct which would imply that the symbol in the corner does actually mean its a right triangle, like manifold was sayin
usando uma resposta que varia de acordo com a altura do "semi-circulo" da parte de cima da janela
i'm just sayin like it would be inaccurate for me to call it "not solvable" if its drawn to scale but like you would have to measure it 😂
porque o valor varia de acordo com a altura acima do lado da janela lá
in school? yea they wouldnt make you do that
in practice? sure :D
😂
well no not a ruler
you'd measure it with some other instruments i'm sure but 💀
assume the top side is 50√2 then use the non-intersecting segment formula (2/7.r²)
then the total area = L of the rectangle + 1/2 of the segment area
L total = 50√2.60 + 1/2.2/7.(50√2)²
L = 300√2 + 1/7.5000
L = 1138.5 cm²
How about this one? Is this correct?
just curious why u r pinging? does the classic area argument still work? I think it should
…
A = ab sin C = bc sin A = ac sin B
I was talking about the proof of the trig addition. I think that’s a bit more difficult to show but not so hard
?
I see
I mean in some sense u need to be able to consider the sin of an obtuse angle. otherwise it’s impossible
but yeah
look at the image I sent before
I think sin and cosine are basically useless in triangles (change my mind?). So I don’t see why u would be so fixated on that
what’s good about it in right triangles
or from the right triangle definition
exactly
better when the triangles are not corrupted by trig
yes
nah but actually like trig doesn’t rlly help u solve like nearly any geo problem that u can’t solve with other tactics
wdym?
there are many situations that require trig. Like knowing one side length and one angle of a right triangle (other than the right angle) and needing to know the other sides. You know, the most basic application of trig
60 30 triangles are also essential for trig
<@&268886789983436800>
That looks so beautiful yet so brain wrecking at the same time
i thought moderators were called on this
"How dare they draw this profanity and throw it in a public channel"
the Chinese characters add to its complexity
and the last thing that shouldn't be forgotten: the low quality of the image
it shows the immeasurable number of times it has been screenshot to be displayed and appreciated
i mean yea 1/2 ab sin in between
and i get the angle in between using cosine rule
maybe can link to sine law
Why sin theta=P/H
I can literally derive it [only if that's a legit question]
so you're basically asking "why is it that for a given angle in a right triangle, the ratio of the length of the side opposite of it to the length of the hypotenuse equals the ratio of the length of the side opposite of it to the length of the hypotenuse?"
maybe your real question is its reason for existence
can you do it here?
what if the oppiste is missing and adjacent is missing so i am forced to use sin
wdym? give me an example?
And don’t give me an example where u have to use a calculator to approximate the sides
I mean that’s just approximations of sides so not rlly useful
I think it’s just more useful in something like physics
When plotting a function for sine or cosine i have a question about the “phase shift” =C/B
is the phase shift always shifting on the x axis?
Oh ok
I mean if it’s a completely random triangle it isn’t so useful u won’t rlly get an exact answer anyways without trig ratios. if it’s a particular angle that’s nice there are things u can do
but u can find those with “pure geometry”
Nothing that was mentioned shows how trig is useful.
Random example but if I said like Γ(a) is the real root of x^3 + x^2 + a and I claimed it was very useful cause it could help me find the real roots of x^3 + x^2 + a, I don’t think anyone would start adapting my notation. In like Euclidean geometry I don’t think it’s so helpful
I think it basically never simplifies/helps solve a problem u can’t do otherwise
they’re useful for real world type applications when you actually want to know how long some sides are or what some angle is, to an approximation.
If you’re talking about more pure geometry kind of problems like proving theorems, then you may be right that they don’t come up very much.
yeah I mean in pure geometry they aren’t that helpful, especially compared to like similar triangles, Heron’s formula, etc etc
Goodmorning
is this supposed to be easy 😭
there’s a theorem that gets u the answer immediately. I’m assuming u don’t know it
construct segments so u can make use of the angles given
i asked ai and it said 70+40=100/2=55
is that correct?
yes but the answer isn’t important
^
no i dont know it
wdym? yes I said u don’t know the theorem but find the angle nevertheless given what I said. it’s a good thing to be able to do yourself
if you ever forget this theorem, especially on a test, u can quickly rederive + it helps u understand it better
do you know the circle angle thing? that central angle/2 thing?
Construct a line connecting the top two endpoints of the lines with the circle
By the angle in the centre principle, the base angles are 40/2 and 70/2
Then instead of doing 180 - (180 - x) you just have x, where x = 20 + 35 = 55
Well I mean you posted a lot about the theorem already
Once they understand it they can now look at my message
Uhhhh
It's a property ain't it?
2arctan x = arc sin (2x/1+x^2)
Idt there's a pi there
Besides when u put a negative value in arc of sin and tan it'll just put the negative outside
But for arc cos (-x)= pi-arc cos(x)
As cos is an even function but sin and tan are odd so they aren't affected by the negative value
there is for x > 1
okay, $\sin u = \frac{2 \tan(u/2)}{1 + \tan^2 (u/2)}$
now sub in $u = 2 \arctan x$ and you get $\sin(2 \arctan x) = \frac{2x}{1 + x^2}$, because $\tan(\arctan x) = x$
south
now, you have to be careful with arcsin(sin u), because that is definitely not u
same for arccos(cos x) and arctan(tan x)
(in fact, the period of arcsin(sin x) and arccos(cos x) is 2pi, and for arctan(tan x) it's pi; why?)
the range of u will be form 2 arctan 1 to 2 arctan infinity
pi/2 to pi
for these values of u, you have arcsin(sin u) = pi - u
because pi - u will be in [-pi/2, pi/2], where [-pi/2, pi/2] is the domain of arcsin
that completes the expanation, given what we defined u to be
about to take my test, someone bless me please
red is wrong green is right
how does this make sense
ah, the triangle with the 30 and 60 is a right-angled triangle
you know this because the angles on a straight line add up to 180 degrees
so 90 + x = 180, x = 90
so equalateral triangles are 60 60 60 and right triangfes are 30 60 90?
yes, well the right triangle made in a equilateral triangle is 30-60-90
okay so you've divided the hexagon into 6 equal parts
so angles around a point = 360 deg
each central angle must be 360/6 = 60
then you break one of the 6 triangles into 2 equal halves
so 60 breaks into 30 and 30
the blue triangle is equilateral so the base angles are 60
but you could also do 180 - 90 - 30 = 60 too
there's also a 45-45-90 right triangle which is very common
and a lot of other right triangles with random angles
so an isoleces
im so cooked
it's actually just area = 1/2 * n * s * a
n is the number of sides
so
1/2 x apothem x permiter
yep
number of sides * the side length of each triangle
that gives the perimeter
in fact it's just 1/2 bh = 1/2 * s * a
and then you multiply this by n, cause you have n triangles in total
oh yeah this is easy
oh yeah
yeah the apothem is a fancy Greek name for the height
the side length is the base
that's how
Guys why is the bgtan (-V3) = -π/3 and not the supplement π-π/3
I know its about the range of the bgtan but like is 2π/3 inside the interval -π/2,π/2?
Vanellope von Schmugz
Yes
Which means 2pi/3 should be the answer
Right
Bec the range of bgtan is ]-π/2,π/2[
HEY GUYS QUICK QUESTIONS DO I ALSO CALCULATE PI OR LEAVE IT THE PI LIKE ITS A UNIT
2pi/3 is not in there
So 2pi/3 should be the answer
it's not in there so it isn't the answer
What abt [-1/2,1/2] meaning everything between those two numbers and those two numbers right
?!
yes
Thus ]-1/2,1/2[ means everything but these numbers
open means those edge values are excluded
no
it'd mean values between -1/2 and 1/2
but not including -1/2 and 1/2
No?
no
Hold on
The bgtan isnt even defined outside that interval
That’s impossible
Thats why there’s two asymptotes
Okay mb
!!!
Okay thanks!!!!
This was kinda embarrassing
Im supposed to know this
you would point out that this is relying on trig ratios for obtuse angles
If abe and cde are congruent, then ac bisects bd and it's a parallelogram. Why don't we know that ad is parallel bc?
is there like a *yet implied somewhere here due to context?
because you totally can show they are parallel, but it requires more steps
using CPCTC, you can get enough info to show that triangles ADE and CBE are congruent
and then you can get that angles ADE and CBE are also congruent, which proves AD || BC
Uhh, the original question was something like, which to triangles, when congruent show that abcd is a parallelogram
Need help on this one <@&286206848099549185>
ABD and CDB
for the second one
arctanx + arctan1/x
arctanx = y
for y >=0
x = tany
arctanx + arctan1/x
y + arctan(-tan(y - pi/2)) = pi/2
for y < 0
y + arctan(-tan(y + pi/2)) = -pi/2
is this looking right
yep!
here are two more ways of understanding this
method 1:
arctan a + arctan b = arctan( (a+b)/(1-ab) )
this is easy to derive from the tan sum formula
the denom 1-ab is zero, and the only way you can take the tan of an angle to get no run is if the angle is +/- pi/2
method 2:
think of the tan function as a function that converts an angle direction into a slope direction, so the arctan function converts slope to angle
imagine a line with slope x and a line with slope 1/x
if you can visualize this, you should also be able to visualize why they are complementary (in terms of their ref angles)

Conatuct a Rhombus PQRS such that PQ = 60 mm and diagonals PR=9 mm.Measure and write Down the Size of Qp̂S.
Construct*
<@&286206848099549185>
@lime crown
did bro just ping the fucking bot role
Yes
yes i am
8
help me out here i forgot the 15 minutes command can you do that rq
yeahhh !
@west knoll what do u want
The area of the triangle
Or the perimeter
The question is not well given
It's pretty easy
Ill let u in on a hint
Conatuct a Rhombus PQRS such that PQ = 60 mm and diagonals PR=9 mm.Measure and write Down the Size of Qp̂S.
Construct*
it hust it
its just it
Ok
Then
Both the diagonals are equal
Should be enough for u to solve the question?
Or do u need more
The diagonals are always equal whether in a parallelogram or in a rhombus
Sorry for the bad handwriting man
Should be simple enough
@west knoll is your problem resolved?
I pinged you because of your about me
what are identities?
i don’t understand them
and i’m in last year of high school
identities are simply statements that are always true
for example:
x+1-1 = x
that one is kinda silly, but examples like
x^2 - y^2 = (x+y)(x-y)
would be more useful
but nonetheless they are all considered identities
identity in math refers to "itself". saying something is equal to itself is obviously true, but not so obvious when they look very different, like in the example i just gave
so we value those identities to be more useful because it allows us to substitute those expressions freely
does that help?
yes thanks you!
not sure whats going on here
it says its a regular pentagon
so 360/5 = 72 degrees internal angle
and A is at 5,2 so it has a lenght of sqrt(29)
how to draw these polar curves without suffering
Sqrt21
Sqrt(5^2-2^2)
Sqrt(25-4)
Sqrt(21)
wait hold on
Wish I could help but I can't even remember 😭
isnt it sqrt(5^2 + 2^2) = sqrt 25+4 = sqrt29
that book giving me diff answers for that question so im skipping it 😭
its alr ill eventually find a way 😭
Wdym different answers
Do you mean finding the points?
i mean actually sketching it by hand
Oh 😭
so when i use cosine rule to get OB using 72 degrees i get like 6.3 something
Plot the points and draw it I don't think it matters if it looks rough
book is saying its 8.3
Let me try it
alr
Is OB the angle??
OB is the length from O to B
Where did you get 72° from
regular pentagon
Just dividing by five?
Should be 540° that's the problem
,rccw
first ever actual polar curve thats not a circle done by hand lets goooo
now i gotta do this 10 more times 😭
Good job 🙏
Practice makes perfect
the thing is
i hate drawing as well 😭
i was so bad at it they barred me from taking it as a subject 💀
(art)
Wow 😭😭😭
Usually what I would do for the ones on the right is just do it in one go
Loop loop loop loop
can every polygon with number points of form 2^2^n +1 be drawn with a straight edge or does it hold for the primes only
Does anyone have the PDF file to the "Geometry and it's Applications" textbook? Any edition is fine, lol
If someone wants to try
$\forall x \in [-1;1] \medskip$
$\sqrt{1-x}=2x^2-1-2x\sqrt{1-x^2}$ find every solution
nayuzz
you can put x=cos(t) and then it is factorized into simple factors.
so, there are 3 real roots: -√3/2 and ±√(10+ 2√5)/4
hello
@verbal quail did you ask the teacher
Hello
i need help finding x on this question
i thought about "cos(30)15" but that doesnt work
write out the trig ratio in full, and do it carefully!
don't try to immediately guess at the answer.
i mean thats what i would usually do when a question like this pops up
hold on
well ofc you have to think about soh cah toa
and seeing where everything is placed i think its cosine
well indeed it is
now write out the actual ratio
there's a detail that i want to see you get right, or correct you if you don't
thats adjacent over hypotenuse right?
yes, but again
yes yes i know
15 is cos(30) times x
Now find the implications of that to reverse engineer the value of X
It’s because x is the hypotenuse and 15 is adjacent to 30
Cos = adjacent/ hypotenuse
Or which way was it I forgot
$\cos{\theta} = \frac{A}{H}$
Ryse
$\sin{\theta} = \frac{O}{H}$
Ryse
$\tan{\theta} = \frac{O}{A}$
Ryse
you have an angle and the side adjacent to the angle
and you want to find the hypothenuse
so we have theta, A and we need to find H
which one of these have an angle, A, and H?
Did you get it?
how do i find the angle thats on the red
180-106
a triangle is 180 degrees ik that
i bet all my money he's 12
who me?
yh
im just bad at math
17
Geometry was at 14 for me
dang
math diffed lol
you're american right ?
nope
which country ?
Math can be hard
Aussie
Esp when u don’t have good teachers
my maths knowledge is really incomplete
wtf is your school systèm
i've down calculus before but i could barely understand some aspects of functions
done*
in my it were 11-12
American
i still don't understan the logic behind why its 180-106 though
180 degrees is a straight line
understandable
Technically it’s supposed to be
Alg 1
Geometry
Alg 2
Precalc
meaning
yk what's a 360 ?
circle
did you played call of duty ?
The 106 lays on the straight line so the other angle must be supplementary, meaning it adds up to 180
oh
But I took accelerated math in middle school so it was
6th and half of 7th
7th and pre algebra
Algebra 1
All in middle school and then
Geometry
Alg 2
Took precalc over the summer
Ap calc + took the ap precalc exam
And then first semester I took calc 2 and now I’m in calc 3
i don't even know what's the garde
tell with the ages
6th is 11-12yo
7th 12-13
8th 13-14
Geometry was 14-15
Alg 2 15-16
Precalc at 16
Calc 1 16-17
Calc 2 17
And I’m still 17 taking Calc 3
goofy school system
I made it worse
wdym
Precalc over the summer, otherwise I’d be in ap calc rn
pretty much the same here
what tf is precalc
i don't live in the same country sis
All the math between algebra 2 and calculus
ohhh
i see
we did the same at 15
in france we did it all at the same time
Ah
dang
Oui oui baguette
oui oui baguette très bon
Ye
Like rn? 8:11pm
That’s time in the us for ya
kinda weird
24 hr is military time
That’s what we call it
ok
fr you're on the other side of the sea
so weird to think that it's 20h in your country
Mhm
what's your opinion on france ?
t'aime*
what're u trying to say ?
I like
j'aime
Yeah
je t'aime mean i like u 💀🙏🏼
I know I said that
^
do you learn french at school ?
Last year, I’ve lost most of it from lack of practice
like what did you learned ?
Just a bit. French 1, there’s 4 years total, 2 required
wdym 2 required
Liek to get into a good college
so you did the 4 years by choice ?
No, I did one year, I was trying to help u understand my level. There’s up to 4 years
oh ok
so you begin learning french
Yeah but I didn’t get to finish cause of my schedule
so which language did you learned at school ?
Spanish now
how many years ?
2 semesters im in my second
in america you count in semesters ?
for us that's trimestre yk
HS ?
High school
it depends on the university. most american universities use a semester system but some use a trimester system (although it's usually called a "quarter system" because of the existence of a summer session)
Mhm
k ty
so they count summer either ?
most people don't take classes during the summer quarter, but it still exists which is why they're called quarters despite most people taking classes for 3 of them
I took a summer class
I took precalc over the summer
so you sacrifice like 1 weak ?
like you were doing math the whole week ?
Two months?
you sacrified 2 months ??
That’s how long the class was
dang
I’d do my work in big chunks
bro 😭
what was it ?
I was like not in real class so I’d just do it when I felt like it
like you goes there when you want ?
No it was online
why are amercians that weird fr
wdym weird 
idk y'all are just weird
like you take am and pm, online school, weird school system
how is that weird 
kinda weird to say like 10pm
22h is way more easier
🤔
nah not even
its just because you're used to it
i don't see a reason for doing one or the other, as long as you know what day it is and what time of the day
both systems got that so yea
nah i use both
i use way more the 20h
then like i was sayin its because you're more used to it
stop yapping pls
i'm rly tired fr

(3am in my country)
3h
👍🏼
yoyoyoy
what's bro saying
bro can't read anything longer than seven letters
fr
my eyes isn't eyesing
fr
we "flip" to a new cycle from 12 o'clock to 1 o'clock
because we are no longer adding one, we are "resetting" the hour value
but for some reason
we "flip" from am to pm (or vice-versa) between 11 and 12
why?
if you treated 12 o'clock as 0 o'clock, now the flip is from 11 to 0
and this lines up and makes perfect sense
did you know that military times does the same thing ?
you begin the day at the beginning of the cycle, 0 o'clock
yeah and this is why military/24h clock is just superior
because it does this
and you also remove the ambiguity of am/pm
because no one ever is going to confuse 3 o'clock with 15 o'clock
but there have been, and there will always be, some people who get confused between 3 am and 3 pm in some contexts
@trail tendon he's way smarter that me to explain why military time's better
nothing the us does makes any sense whatsoever
even our date format is inferior to the EU's
and actually the rest of the world
we use mm/dd/yyyy instead of dd/mm/yyyy
fr and why even do you use miles ?
we organize everything else in order of magnitude and division of units
either from smallest to largest or vice versa
for instance
hh:mm:ss
why would we ever do hh:ss:mm
but that's precisely what you're doing when you do mm/dd/yyyy
and no one ever questions this insanity
maybe because mm/dd is seen as a single entity
fr that's kinda dmb
that's the historical reason
but then when you try to normalize date formats
it gets all messed up
you should never allow yyyy/dd/mm nor should you allow mm/dd/yyyy
but im not going to just pick on the US, i can also pick on the entire human civilization too
we should always count starting from 0, and we should use tau instead of pi
those are probably too late to change because it requires the entire planet to cooperate to a new standard, unfortunately
formally, none of these things prevent you from doing proper and correct math in any capacity
but unfortunately humans are biological fleshbags and not perfect computational machines and so design is an important factor
so we don't make mistakes like mislaunching a rocket because we forgot to convert units and killing people
./rant
thats cuz they don't know the system
how do i know if 0 o'clock is mid-day or mid-night?
obviously its mid-night but if i didn't know that i would get confused
same thing with am pm. how do i know if 12 am is mid-day or mid-night?
its obviously mid-night but if i didnt know that i would get confused
lol
now yes there are two things to remember instead of one which makes it slightly worse i guess
we should also never teach the english language then
if they don't know what the word "sub" means
they might get confused when i say that i want to eat a sub
thinking i want to eat a submarine
ignorance is not an excuse
at one point you didn't know what am/pm meant either, but you learned those dumb rules anyways
what does this have to do with anything?
is am/pm really English tho? isn't it latin?
you didn't know what 0 o'clock meant either...
until you learned it
you're saying you don't know until you learn it and thats true for anything
that would argue that it makes no difference which one you use
you have to learn it anyway
don't think so i learned latin for 4years and never heard abt that
no it is inferior, for the reasons i mentioned
because humans operate under design
not as perfect calculators
i could replace hours 1-12 with the zodiac
that's also the same system right?
hell let's use the chinese zodiac because it's also the same
120 minutes after mouse is tiger
is that just as good of a system?
we could have 🤷♂️ but we aren't boutta change it now lol
why?
unless you make it overly-complicated it doesn't matter much lol
what is mouse o'clock?
i thought am and pm stands for ante meridiem and post meridiem maybe those sound familiar to you
i just told you, it's ordered by the chinese zodiac
i don't know the chinese zodiac cuz thats not a standard way to tell time 💀
not that it couldn't have been, it just isn't
why can't you just honestly say that assigning arbitrary names to memorize for the numbers 1-12 is dumb
yh you're probably right
now that we've already done it yes it would be dumb to change it
in the first place though i don't see why it would be dumb :l
actually nvm it would be dumb because how would you express time in between lol
it should be numerical yea
mb
ok so you see the point of design
and that's my point
you don't even have to change anything because hello the entire world uses the 24h clock pretty much
it already exists as a standard, and it's better
i don't think either design is better
but i could agree that if the entire rest of the world uses 24h system then we should too 💀
i love
any ideas how to find CAE?
Is A the center of the circle?
j
How do you describe transformations?
Like, saying that one figure slides, flips, reflects to another?
Is BE the diameter of the circle?
not mentioned in the question
i dont know actually, question only gives out the diagram and the value of some angles
Wish you'd shared this sooner anyway
So
Using the given info
We know
IBD+DBE+EBJ=180
So we have DBE=58
Now they have given DHC as 68
Which means
Angle DBC will also be 68
Hence DBE+EBC=68
58+EBC=68
hence ebc is 10
And now u have eac
yeah assume A is the centre, that's correct
Yep it has to be the centre
I bet it's the centre so yeah
Cause be is not the diameter fs
woahh i totally missed that one
ive obtained EBC, but didnt know that u can use the "angle at center is twice the angle at circumference" theorem
why it has to be centre?
thanks for this insight btw! appreacite it
super important
it's the question's fault that it didn't say
it's degree measure theorem
you can't do the question otherwise
can someone help me with chemistry??
In geometry, an inscribed angle is the angle formed in the interior of a circle when two chords intersect on the circle. It can also be defined as the angle subtended at a point on the circle by two given points on the circle.
Equivalently, an inscribed angle is defined by two chords of the circle sharing an endpoint.
The inscribed angle theorem...
Ahh I see, thanks
intuitively in a quadrilateral the sum of opposite angles is 180
so yeah you can prove that with this the problem is the proof of the other one
On question 4 im supposed to use identities to simplfiy but the result i got looks more complex lol does this still count as “simplification” bc i removed the degree of 2?
Ywww 😁
Are all values of sin or cos of (π/n) expressible by radicals?
Some people are saying pi/11 isnt, but i don't understand why
wolfram gives this for cos and it appparently (according to desmos, chatgpt and copilot) gives a complex number which the real part is cos(pi/11). but when i evaluate it myself i am getting -1?
for sin it gives one which i know gives a complex solution.
if you mean radicals of only positive real values then no it is not always possible, and the proof is quite advanced and deep if you want to be rigorous, afaik
the reason youre getting weirdness here is due to how complex numbers work
basically, if you take the principal solution of 1^(1/n), you get cos(pi/n) + i sin(pi/n)
so if you do it this way, its almost a tautology
if you know a bit about complex numbers, specifically how rectangular and polar form work, then you can look up either euler's formula or roots of unity
ohk
where cani find such proof?
maybe start here: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAngles.html
The angles mpi/n (with m,n integers) for which the trigonometric functions may be expressed in terms of finite root extraction of real numbers are limited to values of m which are precisely those which produce constructible polygons. Analytic expressions for trigonometric functions with arguments of this form can be obtained using the Wolfram La...
but i wouldn't know anything more than that without spending a significant amount of time digging through it
good luck
can someone pls send a parallelogram
i think it's a similarity problem but dont know where to start
Does anyone have the PDF or book about complex number on solving geogemetry problem
hey can someone help me with this problem? i was absent that day
,rccw
This video tutorial provides a basic intro into trigonometry. It explains how to evaluate trigonometric functions like sin, cos, and tan using soh cah toa and right triangle trigonometry. It explains how to use reference angles and coterminal angles to evaluate trig functions such as sec, csc, and cot.
Trigonometry - Free Formula Sheet: ...
look through this playlist
Given a circle (O) with diameter AD. Choose point B on the semicircle (B is different from A and D). On arc BD, take point C (C is different from B and D). The two chords AC and BD intersect at point E. Draw segment EF perpendicular to AD (F ∈ AD).
a) Prove that quadrilateral ABEF is cyclic.
b) Prove that AE . AC = AF . AD
c) Prove that E is the incenter of triangle BFC.
can someone help me solve c and provide me a detailed and thorough explanation
hello can anyone give me the basic lessons of geometry and trigonometry
we dont do that kind of thing on this server, but there are plenty of free resources online and you are free to ask as many specific questions on this server as you want
c is annoyingly tricky so far
just checking, you already know how to do a and b? and you know the basic properties of the incenter right?
okay shortie princess
okay, thank you what free online resources can you recommend for geometry and trigonometry?
Khan academy
khan academy is just the goat
okay thank you
Oh so 4 would be (cosx)(cosx+sinx)
i did that sh way complicated the first time 😭
anyone can help?
angle should be equal and length should have the same ratio since they are congruent triangles.
i have no idea what cevins is
my progress so far
Heyyy, does anyone have the PDF for this textbook??
Ohh okay. i dont know the theorem about cevians.
Can you give guide me?
Ohh I see. learn something new today hehe
Am I on the right track? Still clueless how to find length DX (point to to base BC)
no worries
I have a question

How do you derive the formula for the surface area of a frustum
conical or pyramidal?
well actually no the idea is the same in either case
a frustum is a pyramid with a smaller pyramid chopped off the top
use that to figure out both pyramids' lateral surface areas and subtract them to get the lateral surface area of the frustum
and then add the areas of both bases
..

