#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
dive it?
You can start by combining like terms
Sum of angles=180°
And the sum of angles is 4.8z+5.6z+7.6z
So 4.8z+5.6z+7.6z=180
No
The 4.8 next to the z is multiplication not addistion
4.8z+5.6z+7.6z=180
z(4.8+5.6+7.6)=180
You can also factor out the z 
@upper karma
aohhh
THANK YOU SM
I BEEN SDOIN THIS FOR SO LONG
see this is how hard it was
and
ion even kno
thank yo uman
@gray pivot ur amazing
hey guys can i get some help for my sophmore geomotry please
Sure
hey y'all i joined just because of this HAHAHAHA 😭 pleaseeee i need help answering them
this is supposed to be our reviewer so like no need to worry for acad dishonesty i swear 🫡
Can y'all give me some tips as to where I can find corresponding angle practice problems to help me cram for the test that's due today?
are you in the US?
Sure am
you could try PMT but that uses UK exam boards
don't think the questions should be that different though
Alright ty! Is it free or?
yeah
could someone explain how i would go about solving this?
Midpoint/thales theorem
QRS is similar to MNP with ratio 1:2
The homothety centered at the centroid of MNP with factor -1/2 sends MNP to RSQ
the 25 and 22 are not needed to find x
but yeah using the perimeter of QRS is a great idea
then multiply by 2
whats even the question
NEVERMIND !!!
who said that lines were parallel
You could prove it
ah
But yea my bad i didnt check it the first time
I know the answer is D but I really don’t understand why
Whats the equation for an arcs end x and y (carthesian) if I have the arcs length, radius, linear and angular velocities?
what grade
how " a " is in R and then they said its in ]0 ; 1[
bruh
It’s an alpha sign in R
bro why they complicate all the thing with doing similar stuff
why they just not do belta
so ur question is so hard bye
chatgpt says the correct answear is " c " idk
Am I wrong to tilt this to the side and treat it like a parallelogram with a transversal line through it?
Plus the triangle ofc
yo can anyone help me w a problem irl. i got a box that’s too big in l, w, and height and i need it smaller to fit a motherboard. lmk if u can help
so i can send dimensions 😭🙏
begging that there’s someone goated at geometry in here
,rcw
,rcw
Pls help the theorem is "If two lines are intersected by a transversal and a pair of consecutive interior angles are supplementary, then the lines are parallel
😭
what do you want? a proof?
Yeah a two column proof pls explain
Like prove any two of the consecutive angles are supplementary 😭😭
Triangle RKT is isosceles
-> RKT = T
-> T = U ——(i)
If angle 1 = angle 2,
-> 180 - angle 1 = 180 - angle 2
-> R = C ——(ii)
Now, T + U + R + C = 360
From (i) and (ii),
2 (R + T) = 360
R + T = 180
So, RU and CT are parallel
Also, C + T = 180
So, RT and CU are parallel
Therefore, RUCT is a parallelogram
TYSM
Np
are coincident lines considered parallel
because two lines are parallel when their slopes are equal
are coincident lines obviously have equal slopes so they should be
but google and my textbook both disagree
easier than it looks
yes arcsin(x) + arcsin(y) + arcsin(z) = 3pi/2 is a very restrictive condition
Isn't it the axiom or sth?
Can someone recommend me any book about basic trigonometry?
||js 0||
Whats the equation for an arcs end x and y (carthesian) if I have the arcs length, radius, linear and angular velocities?
you can use this formula to find the angle in radians
ah but you need the centre of the circle
you need that information for the coordinates of the arc endpoints
or just like any coordinate in fact
What I have is arc length, angular and linear vel, starting coordinates
Doing this in a robotics system
yeah your starting coordinates
we need that
Trying to make location tracking for my robot using imu and encoders
The imu gives me angular velocity, linear velocity and all that
there are actually 4 possibilities
ah so you actually need your linear velocity to tell which direction the initial velocity is, so there are 2 cases/direction * 2 directions = 4 cases in total
you somehow need to find if your robot is going counterclockwise or clockwise
hopefully your angular velocity has a sign or something (it should be, cause velocity is a vector)
I can determine that by seeing if my ang vel is positive or negative
Positive is turning towards right negative is turning towards left
So I got that part covered
but one of the cases would be ending position = $(x_0, y_0) + r (\cos t, \sin t)$ where $t = \frac{l}{r}$
$(x_0, y_0)$ is the starting position
$r$ = radius, $t$ = angle, $l$ = arc length
south
change t with -t to change clockwise/anticlockwise
oh and then change t with (pi - t) radians to get the other circle, so flip left/right
Does o represent starting point and t angular velocity?
(x0, y0) are the starting coordinates
no, t is the angle and t = l/r
l and r you know
L yes r I'm not sure
ah right sorry
ah but linear velocity = radius * angular velocity
now you know the radius
$v = \omega r$
south
@obsidian harness Everything in radians right?
yeah
So the base algorithm is that end position is xo, yo+l +r(cos(t), sin(t)),
it's this
And if the arc is towards left we flip to -(pi-t)?
yeah, if you want to flip left/right
up/down is -t
There won't be down so we can take that factor out
So to flip left and right t = pi -t?
yes
K imma program that, do you know some python so u can verify?
nah sorry about that
I'm not really sure how I would solve this problem, i do know simple things about the triangle like the base angles are equal and how to model it, but I'm unsure how I would get the measures of the angles.
Set <A=x and express <B in terms of x
Then use the triangle angle sum property on triangle ADB
would anyone mind helping me out with some concepts i need to review for my geometry final (geometry of design). its basic stuff like arcs, circles, triangles, law of sin/cos, etc?
Let ABC be a triangle with AB<AC. Let M be the midpoint of BC and let the bisector of <BAC intersects BC at D. Circumcircle of ABC and circumcircle of ADM intersects the second time at E. Prove the triangle EBC is isosceles
where’s this from
when f(f(x)) = x?
Idk they didn't write the source
if you're talking about the meme i posted then i found it on reddit
Which field of math is this? 
Idk i just saw someones message in this channel saying this lmao
This one
is my answer correct
Yep, it's correct
Lmao I finally understand this as an algebra 2 student
Let the angle bisector meet (ABC) at L. Let the perpendicular bisector of BC meet (ABC) at E' not equal to L. You want to prove AE'MD is cyclic.
Nice
Im in the same part of the book lol
<E'MD=90 for obvious reason. Moreover, both E' and L are midpoints of arc BAC and BLC respectively. Then E'L is diameter of (ABC) which means <E'AL=<E'AD=90. This implies AE'MD is cylic so E'=E which implies E midpoint of arc BAC.
True 👍
XZP + angle Z = 180
angle Z = 180 - XZP
angle X + angle Y + angle Z = 180
angle X + angle Y + 180 - XZP = 180
angle X + angle Y = XZP
this is the proof for the
exterior angle = 2 opposite interior angles (in a triangle)
,w 180-(x+55) + 2x-20 + 30 = 180
,w 180 - 55 -45
is there something i should add?
im working on a presentation about ellipses in mathematics, with the focus on a circle
You can list how sine and cosine relate to it
Or polar coordinates
Or Euler's identity
area of ellipse
Circle $C$ has radius 10 cm. How many square centimeters are in the area of the largest possible inscribed triangle having one side as a diameter of circle $C$?
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
can I get some help
Can anyone explain this <@&286206848099549185>
Are you aware of the trigonometric functions and their definitions according to Perpendicular Base and Hypotenuse of a triangle ?
Hello
I need help with how I divide by -4 and then do the trig identities
Question 3.
Ok so for this find the second derivatives for both
Y1 is -4cos(2t) and Y2 is -4sint
Then set them equal to eachother
The negative 4’s cancel and now you have cos2t=sint
The only possible values for this are pi/3 and pi/4 and 5pi/3
Thank you!
Also I’m not sure how she did this
I’m not sure if it’s another trig identity?
hmm
QPR = 140 and PQR = 40
in supposedly triangle PQR, sum of angles should be 180
but QPR = 140 and PQR = 40 and those are 180 but thats not even including PRQ
bc theyre not parallel is js bc u can see theyre not parallel but i dont think thats rlly an ans
How do I start this?
Is it only me who doesn't like geo?
This trigonometry video tutorial explains how to solve right triangles using the Pythagorean theorem and SOHCAHTOA.
Trigonometry Final Exam Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAsbx4TEnL0
Trigonometry - Free Formula Sheet:
https://bit.ly/47diggI
Trigonometry - Basic Introduction:
ht...
The 2 semicircles on the legs have areas that sum to the are of the semicircle on the hypotenuse
Bc the area of a circle is proportional to the square of the radius
So it is just the Pythagorean theorem
hello
how would i solve question 6 when it asks for the perimeter of the quadrilateral
42?
thats what i put and my teacher marked it wrong on my quiz
Oh
it is 42
im guessing its safe to assume the circle is perfectly inside the quadrilateral
the main rule here is tangents from an external point are equal in length
Yes
someone please help with #4
maybe i’m just dumb but i can’t remember how to do this for the life of me
Umm just subtract
start by marking the angles on the diagram and ull figure out what to do next
I-
I think I’m missing something here
Because I did not get that
How is it not 62?
Bad handwriting, but how is it not this?
Also how is your writing so neat 😭😭
Oh
My main question was how 164 is the bottom angle
Bc 164 is acute and in the picture that angle looks like it should be obtuse so idk
It’s given rqp = 164 degrees
Ohh you are wondering if rqk + kqp = rqp
In the picture the line doesn’t look straight, therefore where you placed rqp should be >180
Apple Pencil 😎
Ah I see
My finger on a phone screen at 1:30am is not very good at writing neatly lol
U call that neat..
Can anybody recommend an in depth video tutorial on trigonometry on yt? Most ones I find are quite basic and cover simple examples.
can someone solve this
You actually don't need the 63 at all
Search up parallel line properties
Look at mine -_-
It’s neat
Terrible diagram, but I believe this is the answer, let me know if you have any questions!
Did it on paper to try to make it more readable, the highlighting of pink and yellow shows the angles used in the equation and the green is the Z, I hope this is better
how do I find all the solutions to arctan(-1)
do you mean all the solutions to tan(x) = -1?
arctan(-1) only has one result
as a trigonometric ratio or as a function ?
only -pi/4
I also thought -pi/4 is only solution, maybe I'm tripping
Like was related to an exercise is was trying to solve like the other day
Dunno, ignore me i am 100% tripping
,w (180-2x)2 = 7(2x)
it IS 20
can anyone help me w some trig pls 🙏
360°-71°?
canada
i'm taking IB though cuz the education system there is kinda mid
Lemme google really quick
Explain what you meant
i'm taking the IB program rather than the local education system there cuz it sucks
Idk what IB is
International Baccalaureate
Ookay...
Lemme google really quick
This thing is cool bruh
No one ever told me about these things
But why only 1 sub
?
I mean... if students could get access for all 6 subjects, it'd have helped ig
Angles and stuff
Count angles for example
I did write quite a few angles , by using the fact that the sum is 180, but didnt get anywhere
Any more specific tip
which are similar?
||TXA and TYC||
the slope is m 
mx+b= the output of a line (or y value)
m-slope
x-input
b-vertical shift
Wrong
wdym wrong :<
You forgor infinite slope
thats not a defined slope :<
lines of the form x = a
clownbait
undefined
but it doesnt matter. its a line still
indeed 
you got scammed bruv, provincial boards have decent education
kick back and get your 90%+ average
but no, your parents drank the IB kool-aid and now you have to suffer
good luck!
can anyone provide any good resources for knowing stuff,
Khan Academy and Paul's Math Notes (algebra section)
for textbooks Axler's Algebra and Trigonometry is pretty good
whats paul's math notes
there are a lot of other resources
a summary of lecture notes from a uni
like that's good if you want to understand one specific topic quickly or for review
doesn't have a ton of practice material
If a chord makes an angle with centre of circle find the angle made by same chord in minor segment
Angle =70 deg
Can anyone solve the above
bruh use your brain
yeah question is ambiguous
my friend who helped just said place down whatever you want on there
and i did
and it was quite simple
and i'm proud of myself
I'm a high school student preparing for jee, I'm struggling WITH geometry
To me, geometry feels like doing random things and finding stuff and just hope you get the answer. Feels like there's no methodical way to solve qs
Any advice?
In geometry, there is no clear recipe for solving this particular problem (not coordinates, complex numbers, barycentric, etc., but even there you need to be able to count correctly), but there is a certain base with which you can solve most problems from various tests and exams. Usually, the basic knowledge of the textbook is always enough for this, but if it does not work out at all, then you can turn to the counting method of solving problems.
Countjng method?
Count in coordinates for example.
Geometry is art of find the problem it's a problem solving skill with whom only those who are truly creative are gifted with we should appreciate it as an important part of the Mathematics.
Yeah, sometimes you need to use creativity for solving problems that you don’t see a “direct” way to solve it, like drawing auxiliary lines and segments. This is an beautiful and important part of Math
trivial by complex bash
GIVEN: QUADRILATERAL PEAR, PE is perpendicular to EA. PE is congruent to EA. PROVE QUADRILATERAL IS A SQUARE.
Basically if all you know is a quadrilateral has one pair of congruent perpendicular adjacent sides how tf do u prove it's a square
who knows similar books to zambak geometry or just geometry problem book with picture 7-9 grades?
If there are no other data it may not be a square.
SO THEN
IS THE SYMBOL A PARALLELOGRAM
can I show u it
no, not necessarily
The vertex R can be anywhere
so, it is already given that PEAR is a parallelogram
then there is no problem. It is obviously a square.
IM GONNA CRY
I WASTED ONE HOUR
SCREAMING OVER THIS
2 HOURS
JUST TO FIND OUT
but thx for telling me
:3
Take it easy. That's life. It's always like that.
yo
bro
the note is saying that it is a quadrilateral
not necessarily that it is a parallelogram
Should I try my hand at seeing if I can explain this myself
Actually I'll probably f it up
Yeah I just realized I'm wrong not typing it
hi amogh
PEAR with 2 consecutive sides PE and AE are equal so PEAR is a rhombus and with PE is perpedencular to EA so angle PEA is 90 degrees so PEAR is a square
can nsomeone look at my proof w me
this question
ans is 1
i got 1
and 0
ad i figured out what i did wrong in 0
pleasueeeeee
im not sure how many messages i need to send in here daily to get my role
but im trying 2 for now
some one teach me ts please
hey guys can someone explain sometjing to me
i need to find value of
m<1,2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11
angle 5 is equal to 9 and 7
angle 4 is equal to 11 and 2
For the angle 10, you must apply the theorem of the sum of the internal angles of a triangle
i remember you getting somewhere last time, use product to sum on the denominator on wherr you left off
m<1 = 180 - m<4
m<8 = 180 - m<5
m<6 = m<8
m<3 = m<1
m<7 = m<5
m<2 = m<4
So now you have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
m<9 + m<10 + m<11 = 180
And the triangle in the middle has to have angles summing to 180
m<10 = 180 - m<5 - m<4
You can also find 10 using the parallel lines, so
m<9 = m<5
m<11 = m<4
m<10 = 180 - m<9 - m<11
This gives the same answer
I believe this is all accurate, feel free to correct me if I made a mistake
The answers (I suggest trying to work them out first but if you can't do it then the answers are listed here in ascending order):
||m<1 = 150||
||m<2 = 30||
||m<3 = 150||
||m<4 = 30||
||m<5 = 50||
||m<6 = 130||
||m<7 = 50||
||m<8 = 13||
||m<9 = 50||
||m<10 = 100||
||m<11 = 30||
hey could you please help me
i need someone to help me with these triangle proofs asap
i need to get this is to pass this semester and its due tomorrow at 8am
Not sure about this but I can try to help
one sec i have help rn
Can you send me it anyways? I’d like to try to figure out what it is for later on
Thanks
Yey eye y eI EMR SLEPT SO MY HELP CHANNEL GOT CLOSED LMAO
Hi, I'm studying 'Trigonometric Identities,' but honestly, I'm not understanding anything. Could someone help me with that?
What exactly interests you?
There are plenty of trig identities. If you don't understand how they work, you should watch proof of them or visualisation
Hi, is the radius of the small circle = 3.58?
Oh, it might be 2,965
I did a mistake
js 3
perhaps u rounded smth up before final ans?
okay so we can tell the diameter of the larger circle is 24 so the radius is 12
consider the right angled triangle, the vertical line is 12-r
the horizontal line is 27-12-r
the hypotenuse is 12+r
,w (12-r)^2 + (27-12-r)^2 = (12+r)^2
Can we discuss P VS NP
not here
So where
At the discussion channel they are always cracking jokes, I obseved you guys are a bit more serious
You in particular
this is still the wrong channel
I mean #math-discussion then
if you're serious
So I see it that way
how did he turn the equation on the left into the equation on the right i don't get it
i hate trignometry soo bad
it is mostly just memorizing a lot of identities
cot^2 is a quotient identity that turns into cos^2/sin^2
which gives you the opportunity to divide out cos^2
1/sin^2 is a reciprocal identity that equals to csc^2
then there is a pythagorean identity of 1 + cot^2 = csc^2
which can be changed to be cot^2 = csc^2 -1
which can be substituted
I couldn't see that i could divide out cos^2 ,which confused me a ton, thank you soo much
$e^{i\pi} = cos(\pi) + i sin(\pi)$
= -1 :>
Pi, a future fluent jp speaker
fixdth :D
tangents are drawn to circle x^2+y^2=8 at the points where the line x+2y=4 intersects the circle. Find the point of intersection of tangents
what have you tried
i tried out assuming the points of tangents to he (alpha,beta)then substituted in the eqn for xalpha+ y beta =8 the solution says a1/a2 =b1/b2 =c1/c2 for the equations xalpha+ybeta=8 and x+2y=4
you can just do x = 4 - 2y and sub into x^2 + y^2 = 8
then use the perpendicular lines to the radius through those points
ye ik but can u explain what method they used?
can you send the sol?
i just wrote it above
um......... send the picture pls
they used a1/a2=b1/b2=c1/c2 for the lines xalpha+ybeta =8 and x+2y=4
i don't have the image
wait
let me find
oh yeah shortcut method, can't explain it tho
why
they're the same somehow, idk
no they both represent the same eqn of the tangent
Smth like that ig
two equation represnts the same lines so making them identical
but how are they identical
x+2y=4 is the eqn of the line
and xalpha+ybeta=8 is the eqn of the tangent from a,b
ah, consider the point (4 - 2t, t) on the line
then we must have x * x + y * y = 8
replace and get x (4 - 2t) + y t = 8
hmmm
yeah (2, 4) is always a point on this line
since we could have two different values of t, for the two tangent points of the circle
these two tangent lines must always intersect at this point
two non-parallel lines only intersect once
very very clever
and that means the working above is completely nonsensical
which one
yea
but its made by a famous author
vikas gupta
do u think he'll make such errors
u must know vikas gupta right
for unique solution a1/a2≠b1/b2?
Right answer wrong reasoning ig
update: i found out that the soln was correct
it was the formula for chord of contact of a point with respect to a circle eqns
So the method used was correct
bruh
Do yk about the chord of contact?
Nvm
Nah
can u express sin^2 using the double angle identity or does it not work when sin is squared?
here’s one proof
here. it isn’t too hard to extend this so that it works for all angles
I’ll let u figure it out!
you can try with the definition of dot product of vectors and derive it
I will also avoid spoiling the answer
but try rearranging the identity
$\cos^2 x = \frac{1 + \cos 2x}{2}$, see what you get
south
Why was i never taught that the slope of a line is the tangent of the angle the line makes with a horizontal?
Not completely related but have you ever seen this cool graphic with all the trig functions, plus some ones that are no longer used (versin, exsec, etc.)? it's pretty neat
Yes I love that
I wasn't shown that in school either
I had to learn it on my own
It's very pretty
I've never ever seen versin or exsec or excsc before!
I drew this the other day
chord of a contact of tangents drawn from a point on the circle x^2+y^2=a^2 to the circle x^2+y^2=b^2 touches the circle x^2+y^2=c^2(a,b,c>0) prove that a,b,c are in a gp
I solved this by similarity but need to solve via concepts of circles
Just draw the chord of contact from acostheta, a sintheta to x^2+y^2=b^2
Then set the distance of the line from (0,0) =c
Any have a good playlist or a nice textbook in affine and Euclidean geometry
I need it so much
why acostheta and asintheta
Parameteric point of x^2+y^2=a^2
aw hell naw, i cant prove nothing
ok I can show u. but it’s good for u to figure out (as both a good exercise, and so it’s memorable)
Why the discriminant of of the substituted equation is = 0?
there's only one point of intersection which would correspond to a double root of the quadratic equation
What supposed double root(x¹ = x²) have to do to 1 intersection?
I still can't understand 
can you clarify what is the substituted equation?
y (of the tangent line) = y (of the parabola)
2x - 1 = x²
0 = x² -2x + 1
So i can create new parabole with the new equation that the roots will be same?
the new parabola will have its roots at the x-coordinate of the intersections of the original parabola and line
a quadratic with discriminant 0 has only one root, which corresponds to only one intersection between the line and parabola
Does "Sin n(theta) = 2sin (n x theta/2) x cos (n x theta/2)" exist as a formula ? . Refference -> Sin 2(theta) = 2sin(theta)xcos(theta)
you can substite u = ntheta and yes it'd work
can be anything basically as long as u split it in half
Okay! So the thing that I am interested in is, whether it would be the same as sin 3theta which is a triple angle identity. ref -> sin3theta = 3sintheta - 4sin^3theta.
since sin 3 theta according to this would be Sin 3theta = 2 sin(3theta/2)cos(3theta/2).
Are they equal mathematically?
no it doesnt work like that
the multiple angle formula for sine is a little more complicated than that
$\sin^n \theta = \frac{1}{2^n} \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} (-1)^k \cos((n-2k)\theta)$
ashy!
i wonder how they derived that 
ask daddy euler
it does
sin(3 * 17) = 2 sin(3 * 17/2) cos(3 * 17/2)
this is what u get for not reading closely
(me not reading it at all)

soent all that time typing ts for nothing
de Moivre’s, probably
what are all th trandformations which take circles/lines to circles/lines?
inversions + homothety + rotation + reflection is all ig?
(translation is a special case of rotation)
Hello. I’m taking calc 2 next semester and I’m worried about trig and algebra. Does anyone have any resources where I can practice/learn in order to succeed? I’m super overwhelmed with all the resources available and I’m not sure where to start
trig is not a big deal you just need to remember the classic values and the identities
Is the smaller cone congruence to the larger cone?
nope
So for example if the height of larger cone is H and the height of the smaller cone inside of the larger cone is h, I can't use comparison like H/h = 1/2 right?
And for this why is it x¹ + x² > 0 or the x¹ . x² > 0? Is it because of the discriminant is > 0?
thats similarity not congruency
can u translate the ques?
discriminant > 0 doesn’t necessarily mean x1 + x2 > 0
im guessing its smth to do with the graph on the right
Ahhhh yes, that is what I mean, is the smaller and the larger cone is similiar?
Yes, so I need to evaluate whether the condition in (1) to (4) is determining the parabola on the right side
I can't evaluate wether the (3) and (4) statement is right
Sum of roots and product of roots
how is this pre university
Just get to #calculus lmao
isnt this the pi equation where an indian godess reveal to ramanujan in his dream?
its like half of his equation are from his dreams
How did it get the > 0 in -b/a & c/a?
Where the > 0 comes from 
I only know x¹ + x² = -b/a & x¹ . x² = c/a

Both roots are >0
From the graph
if u mean about a shape having more than one pair of opposite sides being parallel, there is not uniform agreement if it should be called a trapezoid. it seems this source would call such a shape a trapezoid
(a square is one obvious example - but yeah sources disagree if a square is a trapezoid for the above reason)
yeah i know there’s disagreement
i want to know what this source thinks
at least one pair of opposite sides are parallel, i would think
is it phrased ambiguously?
slightly. but a shape with two pairs of opposite sides being parallel does have "two opposite sides [which] are parallel"
personally once I came to terms with accepting that squares were rectangles as a kid, seeing this I feel totally fine accepting that rectangles are trapezoids.
hmm fair enough, i thought so too
maybe as just a reassuring thing, if the length of the bases are b and B respectively and it has height h, the area of a trapezoid is h*(b+B)/2 which when b=B makes bh. So the area of a trapezoid formula really does give you the area of a rectangle as a special case
i need 100% confirmation cuz i need to use whatever definition is here on my exam
lol
depends, what exam
yeah that’s fair enough
i don't see any exam that wouldn't bother clearing the ambiguity caring about it
no the handbook already provides this definition
which is unclear
but yeah so they won’t repeat the definition
😭😭
which handbook
i think the mainstream definition is the inclusive one
some random exam
which is
yep fair enough, thanks
i’m fine with all that but i need to know whatever this definition deciphers to cuz this is all that matters 
you might want to ask your teacher real quick before or after class starts, "Hey prof! Is the definition of trapezoid is exclusive of rectangles?" if they say yes or no is what really matters since they're grading it! 🤣
too late for that 😭also it’s a bit of a standardized exam
i mean i dont see any question on a school exam asking this, and moreover its disputed
whatever u guys interpret that thing means
boards eh
is probably how it’s supposed to be interpreted
it’s not disputed bc they just provided that
this sounds like the inclusive definition of a trapezoid
then take it at face value
also squares and rectangles fit under the definition of isosceles trapezoid, so it definitely makes sense
Guys can you give me a geometry question
Prove that the shortest line segment that can be drawn from a point to given line is Perpendicular to the given line.
intercept form of a plane
we define the intercept form for a plane as x/j + y/k + z/l = 1, where the coefficients of j,k, and l are to be determined.
you know ax + by + cz + d = 0 is the general form of a plane
and then proceed from there
that's for a line
u can see a bunch of derivations there
||just Pythagorean theorem||
Prove Feuerbach’s theorem: that the nine-point circle is tangent to the three excircles of a triangle as well as its incircle
There are two triangles ABE and ECD with a common escribed circle- W, which touches the lines CE and BE at points B1 and C1, respectively. Let I and J be the centers of the inscribed circles ABE and ECD, respectively. It is known that the lines IC1 and JB1 intersect at a point S lying on W . Prove that the circumscribed circle of triangle AED touches W
Can i use coordenetes
There is a different ways to solve this, you can try
Would someone like to help me with this? It’s proving with trig identities. I get to the part with cos/1-sin but I’m having a brain fart on how you can multiply it by 1+sin/1+sin. Wouldn’t you have to multiply it by 1-sin/1-sin? This may be a stupid question but bear with me
I get to the part with cos/1-sin • 1/1 *
no, u have to multiply and divide by (1-sinx) to convert the denominator to (a+b)(a-b) form- which gives u a^2-b^2..... So u get 1-sin^2x which is equal to cos^2x
Sorry, I’m still not getting it. Would doing that not end up with this?
Wait no I see what’s wrong with that
u can't multiply different factors in the numerator and denominator
it has to be the same such that it reduces to 1
and multiplying with (1-sinx) will give (1-sinx)^2
Yes I realized that after I sent it
Correct me if I’m wrong but you use 1+sinx just so you can get to the (a+b) (a-b) form right? I see that’s what you were saying now
yes
Ok thanks for the help
so that it becomes cos^2x eventually
Honest opinion. Do u think im cooked in calc 2 next semester if I had that question
This is apart of a refresher I’m making before I start classes again
I mean depends on what's the syllabus-
but basic trigonometry just requires a bit of patience and practice- not that big a deal
Alright thanks
js use yt
hi guys! does anyone know any sources to learn olympiad geometry from scratch?
i mean i do know like id say 60% of the theorems and stuff but my mind goes blank the second i see a geometry question
My teacher gave me like 100 math problems over break lol
i fucking love algebra and calc
but i dont really like geometry
cant draw for shit
its just not me
i like trig tho
its like the best parts of geometry
combined with all of algebra
to create a beautiful combinatio
fr
graphing is shit
you have to be precise
but thats all my teacher gives me for extra credit
also
my teacher quit mid school year
so now we have an asian teacher as a replacement
like 5 kids got detention cuz mfs were making the stereotypes
i feel genuinely bad for her
she already getting hate
she aint even teaching
idk how she teaches
she talked to us
she is going to be faster than her
but i keep up
yt
filled with great problems with great solutions by great teachers
Highly recommend Evan Chen
Specifically, EGMO book
any channel recs?
thanks!
my special interest was angle problems
but mainly in turkish
and azeri
Found it
Since two white triangles on the left are similar then (s-sqrt(b^2-s^2))/a=s/b.
.
You might be interested in this
Take cos of both sides using the identity for cos(a + b)
Also cos sin x, draw a right triangle for tjis
,w 2 arccos(1/4) + arcsin(7/8)
I don't understand sir :(
The question is wrong
In ax² - bx + c = 0, what does a and -a have to do with the open up and open down of a parabola. Ik if a > 0 then it is open up and vice versa, but why??
for bigger x values, the ax^2 term is much bigger than (-bx+c), so the ax^2 makes the big changes. Also, we know that x^2 is positive, so the sign of a determines the sign of ax^2
So if a>0, then the biggest term is a big positive number so the parabola opens up. If a<0, the biggest term is a big negative number so the parabola opens down.
not the best explanation but idk how to explain it better 💀
Dw I understand it, it's like ax^2 is the president and (-bx+c) is the citizen right
frr 😂
if you're close to the vertex then (-bx+c) and ax^2 are closer, but once u stray far enough away from the vertex ax^2 just completely overweighs (-bx+c)
just made up a new word overweighs 
unless thats a word
idk
dominates is what u r looking for
but this looks like the wrong channel for that

math be like
its an actual term yeah thats used
We have discussed:
- Angles
- Angle Pairs
- Measurements on Pairs of Angles
- Parallel Lines Cut by Transversal
- Problem Solving Involving Parallel Lines Cut by Transversal
- Angle Bisector & Line Segment Bisector
We have discussed:
- Parts of a Circle
- Circle & Its Arc
- Intercepted Arc
- Inscribed Angle
- Angles Formed by Tangent & Secant Lines
- Secant-Tangent
- Angles Formed by 2 Secants inside the Circle
- Theorem on Intersecting Segment of Chords
- Segments of Secants Power Theorem
- Tangent-Secant Power Theorem
- Arc Length
- Sector & Segment of ...
Alright ty
can someone help me
Are they rectangular ?
Yes
Does anyone know how to solve this one
Turn the two triangles into right triangles with side length 2 as hypotenuse, then use the fact that regular hexagon has each angle 120º to determine that the triangles are all 30-60-90, this means that the leg of the triangle that is tangent to the square is equal to √3. Then, since the total height of the hexagon is 2√3, take 4-2√3 as the height of the shaded region and multiply by the width, 2.
I had that in a past paper a while ago lol
iirc you use the interior angles of a hexagon to construct a triangle so that you can find the height of a line to the middle of the hexagon, then because you know that the squares have side length two you can work out the area of the overlap
Triangle $ABC$ is a right triangle. If the measure of angle $PAB$ is $x^\circ$ and the measure of angle $ACB$ is expressed in the form $(Mx+N)^\circ$ with $M=1$, what is the value of $M+N$?
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
=1
try using the fact that the sum of the internal angles of a triangle is 180deg
then try finding N by seeing if any unknowns can get cancelled
since you know M = 1, you would reach the answer M + N, whatever it may be
Do you have the answer
?
I can work it out but it might be best to let the one who questioned figure it out themselves
I'm just posing one approach he/she can take.
180 = x + bac
bac = 180 - x
180 = bac + 90 + bca
180 = (180 - x) + 90 + bca
acb = bca = Mx+N
180 = (180-x) + 90 + Mx+N
90 = 180 - x + Mx+N
-90 = -x + (Mx + N)
"acb = Mx + N with M = 1"
-90 = -x + x + N
N = -90
M + N = ?
1 - 90 = -89
Yes i got it right W
good job 💪
Have you got any good other question
I got a ton
Give other one
but hopefully they are not too easy
its 15 degrees
elaborate
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
helloo, how should I start learning trigonometry? Like, from where? Learning trigonometric functions maybe?
what in the world
can someone please teach me
I managed
$Happy:\left(\sum_{i=1}^9i\right)^2$
Aestusy
(20+25)^2=2025😋
occasus
what kind of identities are you looking for?
i mean it can be rewritten as $(\tan x + \cot x)^2$
世界最強の暗殺者、豹のように迅速の勾陳一
well BEFG is a square and BCE is an equilateral triangle
ye ye my bad
you are right
if one of the sides of the equilateral is equal to one of the sides of the square then BC=BG
yes
and how would you find GCE?
GCE = 60-15 = 45
exactly
I appreciate the help, really
Yo hey guys
Cab u tell me the relation bw sec and tan and secant and tangent in a circle?
Y'all got me feeling like I need to see some Khan academy 😭
sec is just the inverse of tan im pretty sure
Isnt that cot?
well, yeah. my bad
huh
Howd u do it?
Lemme see
Nope
guys can you recommend me a good book about Trigonometry geometry?
Lemme see
https://artofproblemsolving.com/store/book/intro-geometry maybe this but idr if ive used it or not so take my advice with a graain of salt
BINGO!!
thank you
yayy
ofc
Howd ya do ot
you set the equation equal to 0
and factor out x
then you can assume 1 is a root
and go from there
it costs 65$ (
Do you have free version of this book?
Yea
ok yw
dont think they have a geometry one unfortunately
personally geometry was like, my least favorite
so i never cared
uh ill try
Ok
Show that you can split any convex quadrilaterals into any finite amount of pieces and rearrange them to form a rectangle.
I see that parabola is opening up infinitly, does that mean the green line would intercept the parabola at one point?
no
the parabola grows much faster and the green line grows much slower
I didn't quiet understand what is this means 
as you go farther along the positive x-axis, the distance between the parabola and the line gets greater
and it continues to do that forever
since the distance between them grows, they will never intersect
it would have to shrink for them to intersect
if the distance between them was decreasing like this, you know they would intersect
as long as they continue on their implied path lol
I suppose you could also try solving y=x^2 and y=x-1 and check the discriminant
as a way to prove that they dont intersect?
yeah that could be a good way
I see, make sense
, but i was thinking that a parabola is going to open up widening, so it still doesn't have the chance to intercept the line in x positive? Even when the line goes to a place further away from the parabola, while parabola is widening?
well if the two graph intercept
there must be a point where one x satisify both equation
the x does not exist
it could, but it doesnt seem like it will based on the trajectory that you drew
hence they dont intercept
What discriminant have to do with the interception? I think I also still didn't quite understand this one 
So x1 = x2, and y1 = y2? I seee
yes, there is no such x that can result in same y
Why??
because its path is no longer pointing towards the line (right) but rather up more
and for the discriminant, it is essentially saying that y = x^2 = x-1 can be rearrage into x^2 -x + 1, this equation does not have real roots by checking discriminant
the arrow that implies the path is only going to turn in the left direction basically
What is the topic of this lesson?
quadratic equation
Could you also show me why that line will be going to the left direction? 
i cant draw very well but the more you 'zoom out' it will keep going up 💀
Is it because the increase in y value will be greater than x value in higher number that causes the parabola to have steeper graph? For example in x² - 2x - 5, when x = 1.000 and when x = 1.001 have bigger difference in the y value
Im trying to process this one 
essentially yea
the difference between y=x^2 and y=x-1 increases as x increases
I see I see
Nah its ||8||
or alternatively x^2 - (x - 1) is (x -1/2)^2 + 3/4 so always positive
Could someone please help me understand the differences and utilization of degrees and radians? I’m really struggling to understand. Thanks in advance for any help!
1 full turn = 360 degrees = 2π radians
degrees have easier arithmetic but radians have a nice arc length formula and become extremely important in calculus
hmm ok
what is the sum of the total angles of this triangle?
the sum of all angles in ANY triangle should always be 180 degrees
interior angles but yeah
The medians $AD$, $BE$, and $CF$ of triangle $ABC$ intersect at the centroid $G$. The line through $G$ that is parallel to $BC$ intersects $AB$ and $AC$ at $M$ and $N$, respectively. If the area of triangle $ABC$ is $810$, then find the area of triangle $AMN$.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
What is the value of y?
I think 65° because we know that the angle OQR is 25°. Moreover, we also know that POQ is a isosceles triangle because OP = OQ. So, the angle OQR is the same as QPO (25°). We can see that the angle POQ = 180 - 50 = 130°. It's also a central angle with the same arc than the angle y. We know that a central angle is 2 times an inscribed angle of a same arc. We have : y = 130/2 = 65°.
Yeah it's probably that thanks
yeah definitely
do you notice anything about the triangles ABC and the folded triangle?
similarity
exactly! what do you know about the "ratios" of the triangles ABC and CDE? (CDE in the end is just the folded part)
well you got some help on the other channel
but basically in similar triangles a side of a triangle is, let's say "scaled up a factor k" in the other similar triangle
same thing with the area, but it is scaled a factor k^2
makes sense, since we are talking about an area which would be base * height
and in the similar triangle it would be (base * k) * (height*k) which would be the same thing as (base * height) * k^2
so it's just the area of the first triangle * k^2
note the k is the same as the k for the sides
@azure helm
so if you know that CDE = 16/100 ABC
you can try to find the scale factor
and then since you have k^2
you just want k because we want to find a side
so square root of that
and then you just multiply it by the side of the first triangle
I don't get it
whenever u have similar triangles
